2023-05-042022/23:SfU16 · p.11SfUMigration & social insurance

Housing Allowance

Calculation of income used to determine housing allowance

What's at stake: The decision affects how accurately the housing allowance matches households' actual finances and thus the risk of debt among families with children who are paid too much or too little allowance. It particularly concerns households whose income changes quickly.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

The question is whether the income used to calculate housing allowance should be based on current historical income data from employer tax filings, or whether the ongoing inquiry work should be awaited before the rules are changed.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The committee notes that a proposal to base the income used for housing allowance on current income data from employer tax filings is already being prepared within the Government Offices following a government inquiry, and therefore sees no reason for parliament to issue a formal statement on the matter now; the motions are rejected.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 21 (S)

S wants the income used to calculate housing allowance and the income used to determine maintenance support to generally be based on current historical income from employer tax filings, in line with the inquiry's proposal, and points in particular to the need to be able to adjust the allowance quickly at a time of rising interest rates and steep rent increases.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 21 by S.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
VNoAbstain 0/0/20/4departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed
Sown reservationNoNo 0/93/0/14follows the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
MPNoYes 14/0/1/3departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
CNoAbstain 0/0/21/3departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
LNoYes 13/0/0/3departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed
KDNoYes 16/0/0/3departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
MNoYes 59/0/0/9departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
SDNoAbstain 0/0/63/9departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed

Broke with the party line

MPLeila Ali Elmi (MP, Göteborgs kommun)Abstain — party line: Yes

MPs whose vote differs from their party's majority position in this division. Marked with a dark ring in the chamber view.

Committee proposal

The Riksdag rejects the motions 2022/23:857 by Martina Johansson et al. (C) proposals 10-14, 2022/23:881 by Martina Johansson et al. (C) proposal 25, 2022/23:1152 by Mona Olin et al. (SD) proposals 16 and 17, 2022/23:1227 by Isabell Mixter et al. (V) proposals 4 and 5, 2022/23:1673 by Annie Lööf et al. (C) proposal 95, 2022/23:2055 by Anders Ygeman et al. (S) proposal 8 and 2022/23:2217 by Jennie Nilsson et al. (S) proposal 11.

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2022/23:857 av Martina Johansson m.fl. (C) yrkandena 10-14, 2022/23:881 av Martina Johansson m.fl. (C) yrkande 25, 2022/23:1152 av Mona Olin m.fl. (SD) yrkandena 16 och 17, 2022/23:1227 av Isabell Mixter m.fl. (V) yrkandena 4 och 5, 2022/23:1673 av Annie Lööf m.fl. (C) yrkande 95, 2022/23:2055 av Anders Ygeman m.fl. (S) yrkande 8 och 2022/23:2217 av Jennie Nilsson m.fl. (S) yrkande 11.

Riksdag decision: The Riksdag said no to approximately 80 proposals in motions from the general motion period 2022. The proposals concern, for example, parental insurance, child allowance, maintenance support and housing allowance.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietNoAbstaindeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan does not address the income calculation for housing allowance, but the closest commitment is that the security systems should function and rest on trust in citizens with effective administration, and that needs should be decisive.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan does not address the income calculation for housing allowance, but the closest commitment is that the security systems should function and rest on trust in citizens with effective administration, and that needs should be decisive. Using current income information from employer declarations as a basis makes the benefit more accurate when rents and interest rates rise, which follows from these principles. The position is thus derived, not explicit.

Original (Swedish)

Planen behandlar inte bostadsbidragets inkomstberäkning, men det närmast liggande åtagandet är att trygghetssystemen ska fungera och vila på tillit till medborgarna med effektiv administration, och att behoven ska vara avgörande. Att lägga aktuella inkomstuppgifter från arbetsgivardeklarationer till grund gör bidraget mer träffsäkert när hyror och räntor stiger, vilket följer av dessa principer. Ställningstagandet är alltså härlett, inte uttryckligt.

  • trust-based efficient administrationdecisive»Ett generellt välfärdssystem baserat på tillit till medborgarna ger en effektiv administration« (party programme ↗)“A general welfare system based on trust in citizens provides efficient administration”
  • functioning security systems»Tryggheten i ett samhälle hänger ihop med hur våra trygghetssystem fungerar« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The security in a society is connected to how our security systems function”
  • needs determine distribution»Behoven, inte betalningsförmågan ska vara avgörande« (party programme ↗)“Needs, not ability to pay should be decisive”
  • rising housing costs»hyresgäster krävs på allt högre hyror« (2022 manifesto ↗)“tenants are charged ever-higher rents”

Worldstate weighed in: Inflation 10.6 percent annually — Rents and living costs are rising rapidly, which makes current income information more urgent for the benefit to be sufficient.; Policy rate 3.5 percent — Rising housing costs reinforce the need for the benefit to be quickly adjusted according to actual income.

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

SSocialdemokraternaNoNofollows the plannot addressed

The election manifesto promises targeted and smart support to those hardest hit by price increases, and allowing the housing allowance to be based on current income information is exactly such accurate support without driving inflation.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The election manifesto promises targeted and smart support to those hardest hit by price increases, and allowing the housing allowance to be based on current income information is exactly such accurate support without driving inflation. The party programme sees housing as a social right and requires good economic protection when income disappears, which speaks for the allowance to quickly follow actual income. The plan is silent on the technical construction, but the counter-proposal's demand is in line with the commitment to strengthen families with children's economy.

Original (Swedish)

Valmanifestet utlovar riktade och smarta stöd till dem som drabbas hårdast av prisökningarna, och att låta bostadsbidraget bygga på aktuella inkomstuppgifter är just ett sådant träffsäkert stöd utan att inflationen drivs på. Partiprogrammet ser bostaden som en social rättighet och kräver ett gott ekonomiskt skydd när inkomsten faller bort, vilket talar för att bidraget snabbt ska kunna följa faktisk inkomst. Planen är tyst om den tekniska konstruktionen, men motförslagets krav ligger i linje med åtagandet att stärka barnfamiljers ekonomi.

  • targeted support against price increasesdecisive»Med riktade och smarta stöd kan vi stötta människor utan att driva på inflationen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“With targeted and smart support we can support people without driving inflation.”
  • housing as a social right»ser bostaden som en social rättighet« (party programme ↗)“sees housing as a social right”
  • security when income is lost»Ett gott ekonomiskt skydd när den egna förvärvsinkomsten faller bort är grundläggande« (party programme ↗)“Good economic protection when one's own earned income disappears is fundamental”
  • strengthened economy for families with children»Vi är beredda att stärka ekonomin för Sveriges barnfamiljer.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We are prepared to strengthen the economy for Sweden's families with children.”

Worldstate weighed in: Inflation 10.6 per cent in annual rate — Brings into focus the plan's commitment to targeted support to households hardest hit by price increases.; Interest rate 3.5 per cent and rising housing costs — Makes accuracy and quick adjustment of housing allowance an acute issue for the plan's housing-social commitment.

MPMiljöpartietNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan wants to raise housing allowances for families with children and sees housing allowances and maintenance support as needs-based assistance to reach those with fewest resources.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan wants to raise housing allowances for families with children and sees housing allowances and maintenance support as needs-based assistance to reach those with fewest resources. Using current income information from employer declarations as a basis makes support more precise and reduces the risk that people bounce between authorities when they need society's support. With double-digit inflation and sharply rising housing costs, quick adjustment is particularly important, which supports the counter-proposal's requirement.

Original (Swedish)

Planen vill höja bostadsbidraget för barnfamiljer och ser bostadsbidrag och underhållsstöd som behovsinriktade stöd som ska nå dem med minst resurser. Att lägga aktuella inkomstuppgifter från arbetsgivardeklarationer till grund gör stödet mer träffsäkert och minskar risken att människor bollas mellan myndigheter när de behöver samhällets stöd. Med tvåsiffrig inflation och kraftigt stigande boendekostnader väger snabb justering särskilt tungt, vilket talar för motförslagets krav.

  • raised housing allowancesdecisive»höja bostadsbidraget för barnfamiljer och bostadstillägget för pensionärer« (2022 manifesto ↗)“raise housing allowances for families with children and housing supplements for pensioners”
  • needs-based housing assistance»barnbidrag och föräldraförsäkring och behovsinriktade stöd som bostadsbidrag och underhållsstöd« (party programme ↗)“child allowances and parental insurance and needs-based assistance such as housing allowances and maintenance support”
  • precise authority coordination»se till att människor inte bollas mellan myndigheter när de behöver samhällets stöd« (2022 manifesto ↗)“ensure that people are not bounced between authorities when they need society's support”
  • redistribution to low-income earners»De med minst resurser ska få mer samhällsservice, lägre skatt och mer stöd i omställningen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Those with the fewest resources shall get more public services, lower taxes and more support in the transition.”

Worldstate weighed in: Inflation 10.6 percent — Erodes households' margins and makes current income information more important for precise allowances; Interest rate 3.5 percent and rising housing costs — Increases need for housing allowances to quickly adjust right now

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

CCenterpartietNoAbstaindeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan's crucial commitment is efforts that mitigate the worst effects of inflation for those with tight margins, and an income-based support built on current employer declarations is precisely such a targeted measure when interest rates and rents rise quickly.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan's crucial commitment is efforts that mitigate the worst effects of inflation for those with tight margins, and an income-based support built on current employer declarations is precisely such a targeted measure when interest rates and rents rise quickly. The plan also wants basic security to be so comprehensive that no one falls through the safety nets and that processing times in authority operations are shortened, which argues for current income figures rather than lagging calculations. The plan does not mention the construction of housing benefit, so the support is derived.

Original (Swedish)

Planens avgörande åtagande är insatser som mildrar inflationens värsta effekter för dem med små marginaler, och en bidragsgrundande inkomst byggd på aktuella arbetsgivardeklarationer är precis en sådan träffsäker åtgärd när räntor och hyror stiger snabbt. Planen vill dessutom att grundtryggheten ska vara så heltäckande att ingen faller igenom skyddsnäten och att ledtiderna i myndighetsutövningen kortas, vilket talar för aktuella inkomstuppgifter framför eftersläpande beräkningar. Planen nämner inte bostadsbidragets konstruktion, så stödet är härlett.

  • mitigate inflation's effectsdecisive»För att möta detta krävs insatser som mildrar inflationens värsta effekter för dem med små marginaler.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“To address this requires efforts that mitigate the worst effects of inflation for those with tight margins.”
  • comprehensive basic security»Den grundläggande tryggheten måste vara så heltäckande att ingen tillåts falla igenom skyddsnäten« (party programme ↗)“Basic security must be so comprehensive that no one is allowed to fall through the safety nets”
  • shorter processing times»Ledtiderna för handläggning och myndighetsutövning i domstolar och myndigheter måste kortas och tillgången till ombud förbättras.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Processing times for handling and authority operations in courts and authorities must be shortened and access to counsel improved.”
  • ease households' housing costs»Därför vill vi se över amorteringskravet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Therefore, we want to review the amortization requirement.”

Worldstate weighed in: Inflation 10.6 percent per year — Makes the plan's commitment to efforts for households with tight margins directly applicable and time-critical; Interest rate 3.5 percent — Rapidly rising housing costs increase the value of having support based on current income

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

LLiberalernaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan does not address how the housing benefit's benefit-determining income shall be calculated.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan does not address how the housing benefit's benefit-determining income shall be calculated. The closest applicable principle is that benefits shall be designed so that marginal effects are reduced and that households with low income and high housing costs shall receive well-targeted support, which speaks for using current income figures. In the current situation with high inflation and rapidly rising housing costs, this weighs more heavily, so the counter-proposal's requirement is supported.

Original (Swedish)

Planen behandlar inte hur bostadsbidragets bidragsgrundande inkomst ska beräknas. Närmast liggande princip är att stöden ska utformas så att marginaleffekterna sänks och att hushåll med låg inkomst och hög boendekostnad ska få träffsäkert stöd, vilket talar för att aktuella inkomstuppgifter används. I nuvarande läge med hög inflation och snabbt stigande boendekostnader väger detta tyngre, varför motförslagets krav stöds.

  • reduced marginal effectsdecisive»utformas så att marginaleffekterna sänks och fler klarar sig utan behovsprövade bidrag« (party programme ↗)“are designed so that marginal effects are reduced and more manage without means-tested benefits”
  • strengthened housing benefit»höjda bostadsbidrag och bostadstillägg« (party programme ↗)“increased housing benefits and housing supplements”
  • support for high housing costs»Pensionärer med hög boendekostnad och låg pension ska få ett särskilt ekonomiskt stöd« (party programme ↗)“Pensioners with high housing costs and low pensions shall receive special financial support”

Worldstate weighed in: Inflation 10.6 per cent and policy rate 3.0 per cent — Households' housing costs change rapidly, which makes current income figures decisive for the benefit to be correct; Rising interest rates and significant rent increases — Increases the need for the benefit to be adjusted quickly, which strengthens the counter-proposal's requirement

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

KDKristdemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan states that low-income families with children, pensioners and students must be given the opportunity for good housing standards and that redistribution measures shall be aimed at those with the greatest need.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan states that low-income families with children, pensioners and students must be given the opportunity for good housing standards and that redistribution measures shall be aimed at those with the greatest need. A housing benefit calculated on current historical income hits the need more fairly and makes the system more reasonable for the citizen, which the plan requires of benefit and social insurance systems. With high inflation and rapidly rising housing costs, real-time targeting becomes crucial for the commitment to hold.

Original (Swedish)

Planen slår fast att lågavlönade barnfamiljer, pensionärer och studerande ska ges möjlighet till en god bostadsstandard och att fördelningspolitiska åtgärder ska riktas till dem som har störst behov. Ett bostadsbidrag som beräknas på aktuella historiska inkomster träffar behovet mer rättvisande och gör systemet rimligare för medborgaren, vilket planen kräver av bidrags- och socialförsäkringssystemen. Med hög inflation och snabbt stigande boendekostnader blir träffsäkerheten i realtid avgörande för att åtagandet ska hålla.

  • housing standards for low-income earnersdecisive»Lågavlönade barnfamiljer, pensionärer och studerande måste ges möjligheter till en god bostadsstandard.« (party programme ↗)“Low-income families with children, pensioners and students must be given opportunities for good housing standards.”
  • support aimed at greatest need»En social marknadsekonomi kräver fördelningspolitiska åtgärder som riktas till den som har störst behov« (party programme ↗)“A social market economy requires redistribution measures that are aimed at those who have the greatest need”
  • reasonable and well-targeted benefits»Skatte-, bidrags- och socialförsäkringssystemen ska sammantaget ta hänsyn till familjesituationen« (party programme ↗)“Tax, benefit and social insurance systems must together take account of family situation”

Worldstate weighed in: Inflation 10.6 per cent — Benefit's purchasing power is rapidly eroded, which requires up-to-date income information; Policy rate 3.5 per cent and rising housing costs — Households with housing benefit face sharply increased costs during the benefit year

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MModeraternaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The election manifesto wants to take control over payments so that tax money is used for what it is intended for, halve benefit fraud and establish a benefit fraud unit at the Social Insurance Agency.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The election manifesto wants to take control over payments so that tax money is used for what it is intended for, halve benefit fraud and establish a benefit fraud unit at the Social Insurance Agency. Placing housing benefit's income base on current information from employer declarations is precisely a way to make payments correct and reduce incorrect amounts and demands for repayment. The plan does not mention housing benefit, but the demand aligns with its control ambition.

Original (Swedish)

Valmanifestet vill ta kontroll över utbetalningarna så att skattepengarna används till det de är avsedda för, halvera bidragsbrotten och inrätta en bidragsbrottsenhet på Försäkringskassan. Att lägga bostadsbidragets bidragsgrundande inkomst på aktuella uppgifter från arbetsgivardeklarationer är just ett sätt att göra utbetalningarna korrekta och minska felaktiga belopp och återkrav. Planen nämner inte bostadsbidraget, men kravet ligger i linje med dess kontrollambition.

  • correctly paid benefitsdecisive»Moderaterna tänker ta kontroll över folkbokföringen för att stoppa bidragsbrotten och se till att de skattepengar du betalar in används till det de är avsedda för.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Moderates intend to take control of the population register to stop benefit fraud and ensure that the tax money you pay in is used for what it is intended for.”
  • halved benefit fraud»I ett första steg är målet att halvera bidragsbrotten under nästa mandatperiod.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“In a first step, the goal is to halve benefit fraud during the next term.”
  • stricter control of payments»Inrätta en bidragsbrottsenhet på Försäkringskassan« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Establish a benefit fraud unit at the Social Insurance Agency”
  • respect for tax money»Offentligt slöseri i alla former ska bekämpas.« (party programme ↗)“Public waste in all forms shall be combated.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

SDSverigedemokraternaNoAbstaindeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan wants to make it harder to exploit Swedish welfare and counteract both cheating and systems that encourage cheating; placing benefit-determining income on current information from employer declarations specifically reduces incorrect payments and recoveries.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan wants to make it harder to exploit Swedish welfare and counteract both cheating and systems that encourage cheating; placing benefit-determining income on current information from employer declarations specifically reduces incorrect payments and recoveries. The plan also wants to curb soaring housing costs so more people can afford a home, which speaks for the benefit being adjusted quickly. The requirement for quality in investigations and shorter processing times in social insurance points in the same direction. The committee's reasons for awaiting ongoing preparation do not address the plan.

Original (Swedish)

Planen vill göra det svårare att exploatera den svenska välfärden och motverka både fusk och system som lockar till fusk; att lägga bidragsgrundande inkomst på aktuella uppgifter från arbetsgivardeklarationer minskar just felaktiga utbetalningar och återkrav. Planen vill också bromsa de skenande boendekostnaderna så att fler har råd till ett hem, vilket talar för att bidraget snabbt kan justeras. Kravet på kvalitet i utredningar och kortare handläggningstider i socialförsäkringen pekar samma väg. Utskottets skäl att avvakta pågående beredning berör planen inte.

  • stop welfare exploitationdecisive»Göra det svårare att exploatera den svenska välfärden« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Make it harder to exploit Swedish welfare”
  • counter cheating-driving systems»Både fusk och sådana system som tenderar att locka till fusk och korruption ska motverkas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Both cheating and such systems that tend to encourage cheating and corruption shall be counteracted.”
  • dampened housing costs»Åtgärder behöver också vidtas för att bromsa de skenande boendekostnaderna så att fler har råd till ett hem.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Measures also need to be taken to curb the soaring housing costs so more people can afford a home.”
  • legally certain processing»Verka för stärkt kvalitet på utredningar och förkortade handläggningstider« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Work for strengthened quality of investigations and shortened processing times”

Worldstate weighed in: Inflation 10.6 percent and policy rate 3.5 percent — Rapidly rising housing and interest costs make lagging income information more noticeable and strengthen reasons to act now

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament