2025-12-172025/26:NU1 · p.1NUBusiness & energy
Objectives for the area of Foreign trade, export and investment promotion
Goal for foreign trade, export and investment promotion
What's at stake: The outcome affects how Sweden's trade policy balances free trade and WTO rules against demands on environment, climate and working conditions, which matters to exporting companies and trading partners in other countries alike.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the parliament's target for trade policy should remain unchanged – free, sustainable and rule-based trade – or be changed to explicitly include fair trade.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee rejects the motion and wants to keep the current trade policy target – free, sustainable and rule-based trade – because it provides good conditions for a strong economy, increased welfare and stronger competitiveness.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 1 (S)
S wants to change the target to explicitly include fair trade, taking into account environment, climate, social security and decent working conditions, in order to strengthen the legitimacy of trade and counter the unfair distribution of globalization's gains.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 1 by S.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have held
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: CCenterpartiet
Ja 180–95Ja 160–115
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Abstain 5/0/13/4 | differs | confidence: high | explicit |
| S | No | No 0/93/0/13 | match | confidence: high | explicit |
| MP | No | Abstain 2/0/14/2 | differs | confidence: high | explicit |
| C | No | Yes 20/1/0/3 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| L | Yes | Yes 13/0/0/3 | match | confidence: medium | derived |
| KD | No | Yes 17/0/0/2 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| M | Yes | Yes 59/0/0/9 | match | confidence: medium | derived |
| SD | Yes | Yes 63/0/0/9 | match | confidence: medium | not addressed |
Broke with the party line
| VHanna Gunnarsson (V, Skåne läns södra) | Yes — party line: Abstain |
| VHåkan Svenneling (V, Värmlands län) | Yes — party line: Abstain |
| VIda Gabrielsson (V, Stockholms kommun) | Yes — party line: Abstain |
| VIlona Szatmári Waldau (V, Uppsala län) | Yes — party line: Abstain |
| VIsabell Mixter (V, Västernorrlands län) | Yes — party line: Abstain |
| MPAnnika Hirvonen (MP, Stockholms län) | Yes — party line: Abstain |
| MPJanine Alm Ericson (MP, Västra Götalands läns västra) | Yes — party line: Abstain |
| CHelena Lindahl (C, Västerbottens län) | No — party line: Yes |
MPs whose vote differs from their party's majority position in this division. Marked with a dark ring in the chamber view.
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motion 2025/26:3593 by Fredrik Olovsson et al. (S) item 23.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motion 2025/26:3593 av Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S) yrkande 23.
Riksdag decision: In total, approximately 9 billion Swedish kronor from the state budget for 2026 goes to the expenditure area for Business and industry. The Riksdag approved the government's proposal in the 2026 budget proposition on how the funds within the expenditure area should be allocated. Thereby, the Riksdag rejected alternative budget proposals in motions. The most funds, just over 3.4 billion Swedish kronor, go to the Agency for Innovation Systems: Research and Development. Just under 813 million Swedish kronor go to the institutes' strategic competence resources and just under 620 million Swedish kronor go to business development. Funds are also to go to 26 additional areas. The Riksdag also approved the government's proposal on financial authorizations. The Riksdag decides on the state budget in two steps. First, the frameworks for the 27 expenditure areas in the budget are decided. The Riksdag decided this on 26 November 2025. Subsequently, the Riksdag determines in a second step how the funds are to be allocated within each expenditure area. This decision concerns step two in the decision-making process.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to change the parliamentary goal for trade policy to include free, sustainable, and just trade that considers environment, climate, social conditions, and workers' rights. (S) — Reservation 1
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The party programme states that Sweden should work for fair trade conditions and opposes trade agreements that restrict the scope for democratic decisions.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme states that Sweden should work for fair trade conditions and opposes trade agreements that restrict the scope for democratic decisions. That the goal for foreign trade explicitly must include environment, climate, social security and decent working conditions is the same demand expressed as a goal formulation. The election manifesto emphasizes that global inequality must be significantly reduced.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet slår fast att Sverige ska verka för rättvisa handelsvillkor och vänder sig mot handelsavtal som inskränker utrymmet för demokratiska beslut. Att målet för utrikeshandeln uttryckligen ska omfatta miljö, klimat, social trygghet och anständiga arbetsvillkor är samma krav uttryckt som målformulering. Valplattformen understryker att den globala ojämlikheten kraftigt måste minskas.
- fair trade conditionsdecisive»solidariskt bistånd och rättvisa handelsvillkor.« (party programme ↗)“solidary aid and fair trade conditions.”
- trade agreements subordinated to democracy»mot handelsavtal som inskränker utrymmet för« (party programme ↗)“against trade agreements that restrict the scope for”
- reduced global inequality»I en rättvis värld måste den globala ojämlikheten kraftigt minskas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“In a just world, global inequality must be significantly reduced.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan explicitly stands for open, free and fair trade and requires that trade agreements be guided by social dialogue, human rights and environment.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan explicitly stands for open, free and fair trade and requires that trade agreements be guided by social dialogue, human rights and environment. That the goal for foreign trade explicitly encompasses fair trade with regard to environment and working conditions is thus the plan's own line. Free trade is simultaneously valued, which the counter-proposal does not shake.
Original (Swedish)
Planen står uttryckligen för en öppen, fri och rättvis handel och kräver att handelsavtal ska vägledas av social dialog, mänskliga rättigheter och miljö. Att målet för utrikeshandeln uttryckligen omfattar rättvis handel med hänsyn till miljö och arbetsvillkor är därmed planens egen linje. Frihandeln värnas samtidigt, vilket motförslaget inte rubbar.
- free and fair tradedecisive»Vi står upp för en öppen, fri och rättvis handel.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We stand up for open, free and fair trade.”
- value-guided trade agreements»EU behöver sluta fler handelsavtal där också våra värderingar om social dialog, mänskliga rättigheter och miljö är vägledande.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The EU needs to conclude more trade agreements where also our values on social dialogue, human rights and environment are guiding.”
- valued free trade»Insatser för att främja svensk export, värna frihandeln och motverka protektionism.« (party programme ↗)“Efforts to promote Swedish exports, value free trade and counter protectionism.”
- fair global distribution»strävar efter en rättvis fördelning av resurser.« (party programme ↗)“strives for a fair distribution of resources.”
The plan explicitly states that the objective is to promote fair trade and that Sweden's and the EU's trade policy shall be a tool for poverty alleviation, human rights and global climate policy.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan explicitly states that the objective is to promote fair trade and that Sweden's and the EU's trade policy shall be a tool for poverty alleviation, human rights and global climate policy. The counter-proposal wants to write in precisely fair trade with regard to environment, climate and working conditions in the objective. This coincides with the plan's commitment.
Original (Swedish)
Planen anger uttryckligen att målsättningen är att främja rättvis handel och att Sveriges och EU:s handelspolitik ska vara ett verktyg för fattigdomsbekämpning, mänskliga rättigheter och global klimatpolitik. Motförslaget vill skriva in just rättvis handel med hänsyn till miljö, klimat och arbetsvillkor i målet. Det sammanfaller med planens åtagande.
- fair trade as objectivedecisive»Vår målsättning är att främja rättvis handel och ge länder i det globala syd större ekonomiskt självbestämmande, inklusive kontroll över sina egna naturresurser.« (party programme ↗)“Our objective is to promote fair trade and give countries in the global south greater economic self-determination, including control over their own natural resources.”
- trade policy with social objectives»Sveriges och EU:s handelspolitik ska vara ett verktyg för fattigdomsbekämpning, främjande av mänskliga rättigheter, fredliga samarbeten, demokratisering och global klimatpolitik.« (party programme ↗)“Sweden's and the EU's trade policy shall be a tool for poverty alleviation, promotion of human rights, peaceful cooperation, democratization and global climate policy.”
- trade must not prevent environmental protection»Handelsavtal ska inte förhindra länder att skärpa skyddet för människor, miljö och djur.« (party programme ↗)“Trade agreements must not prevent countries from sharpening protection for people, environment and animals.”
- climate conditions in trade»införa klimattullar på varor från länder utanför EU« (2022 manifesto ↗)“introduce climate tariffs on goods from countries outside the EU”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The election manifesto is explicit: free trade should be valued and more markets opened, while at the same time stricter requirements for working conditions, environment and climate should be placed in trade agreements.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto is explicit: free trade should be valued and more markets opened, while at the same time stricter requirements for working conditions, environment and climate should be placed in trade agreements. That is in substance the same thing as the counter-proposal wants to write into the goal for foreign trade. The party programme confirms that ethical and environmental perspectives must be taken into account within free trade.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet är uttryckligt: frihandeln ska värnas och fler marknader öppnas, samtidigt som hårdare krav på arbetsvillkor, miljö och klimat ska ställas i handelsavtal. Det är i sak samma sak som motförslaget vill skriva in i målet för utrikeshandeln. Partiprogrammet bekräftar att hänsyn måste tas till etiska och miljömässiga perspektiv inom den fria handeln.
- requirements for working conditions and environment in trade agreementsdecisive»Sverige klarar sig inte utan frihandel. Öppna upp fler marknader för svenska varor och tjänster. Ställ hårdare krav på arbetsvillkor, miljö och klimat i handelsavtal.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden cannot manage without free trade. Open up more markets for Swedish goods and services. Set stricter requirements for working conditions, environment and climate in trade agreements.”
- ethical and environmental consideration in trade»Hänsyn måste tas till etiska och miljömässiga perspektiv.« (party programme ↗)“Ethical and environmental perspectives must be taken into account.”
- trade policy as climate tool»Vi ska använda handelspolitiken för att kapa fossila subventioner runtom i världen och pressa stora utsläppare som Kina att stänga ner sina kolkraftverk.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We should use trade policy to cut fossil subsidies around the world and pressure large emitters like China to close down their coal power plants.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan's trade policy commitment is unambiguously pro-free trade: Sweden shall be a strong voice for free trade and the EU shall completely abolish tariffs and other trade barriers.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's trade policy commitment is unambiguously pro-free trade: Sweden shall be a strong voice for free trade and the EU shall completely abolish tariffs and other trade barriers. Writing in conditions about fair trade in the goal opens for trade-restricting requirements and is not in line with that commitment. The plan's values-driven foreign policy motivates requirements for democracy and rights, but the plan chooses free trade as the means.
Original (Swedish)
Planens handelspolitiska åtagande är entydigt frihandelsvänligt: Sverige ska vara en stark röst för frihandel och EU ska helt avskaffa tullar och andra handelshinder. Att skriva in villkor om rättvis handel i målet öppnar för handelsbegränsande krav och ligger inte i linje med det åtagandet. Planens värderingsstyrda utrikespolitik motiverar krav på demokrati och rättigheter, men planen väljer frihandeln som medlet.
- free trade without trade barriersdecisive»Sverige ska vara en stark röst för frihandel, i första hand genom globala avtal men annars genom regionala överenskommelser. EU ska helt avskaffa tullar och andra handelshinder mot omvärlden.« (party programme ↗)“Sweden shall be a strong voice for free trade, primarily through global agreements but otherwise through regional agreements. The EU shall completely abolish tariffs and other trade barriers against the rest of the world.”
- more free trade agreements»Vi ska stärka EU som frihandelsunion med en fördjupad inre marknad, värna den fria rörligheten i Europa och verka för fler frihandelsavtal med omvärlden.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We shall strengthen the EU as a free trade union with a deepened internal market, protect free movement in Europe and work for more free trade agreements with the rest of the world.”
- efficiency of free trade»Frihandel leder till effektivare hushållning med resurser och snabbare teknikspridning.« (party programme ↗)“Free trade leads to more efficient management of resources and faster technology transfer.”
- values-driven foreign policy»Vi kallar det för vad det är: en ny värderingsstyrd utrikespolitik.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We call it what it is: a new values-driven foreign policy.”
The plan states that the EU has a responsibility to contribute to fair global rules that give all countries the possibility of sustainable development, and that freer world trade with fairer rules is required to reduce inequality.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan states that the EU has a responsibility to contribute to fair global rules that give all countries the possibility of sustainable development, and that freer world trade with fairer rules is required to reduce inequality. It also requires that global ethical codes for business are strengthened and that international trade and finance bodies set high demands for human rights. A goal that explicitly encompasses fair trade is therefore in line with the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att EU har ett ansvar att bidra till rättvisa globala spelregler som ger alla länder möjlighet till hållbar utveckling, och att en friare världshandel med rättvisare spelregler krävs för att minska klyftorna. Den kräver också att globala etiska koder för näringslivet förstärks och att internationella handels- och finansorgan ställer höga krav på mänskliga rättigheter. Ett mål som uttryckligen omfattar rättvis handel ligger därför i linje med planen.
- fair global rulesdecisive»EU har ett ansvar att bidra till rättvisa globala spelregler som kan ge alla länder« (party programme ↗)“the EU has a responsibility to contribute to fair global rules that can give all countries”
- freer trade with fairer rules»rättvisare spelregler är en förutsättning för att klyftorna ska kunna minska.« (party programme ↗)“fairer rules are a precondition for inequality to be able to decrease.”
- human rights demands in international bodies»höga krav på respekt för mänskliga rättigheter i sin verksamhet.« (party programme ↗)“high demands for respect for human rights in its operations.”
- ethical codes for business»Därför är det viktigt att förstärka de globala etiska« (party programme ↗)“Therefore it is important to strengthen the global ethical”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan wants the EU to focus on free trade and a deepened internal market and wants growth to be set first, not for the trade goal to be filled out with further political conditions.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants the EU to focus on free trade and a deepened internal market and wants growth to be set first, not for the trade goal to be filled out with further political conditions. The party programme warns against politics reduced to expensive symbol politics. Writing fair trade with demands on environment, social security and working conditions into the goal therefore lies outside what the plan commits to.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill att EU fokuserar på fri handel och en fördjupad inre marknad och att tillväxt sätts främst, inte att handelsmålet fylls på med ytterligare politiska villkor. Partiprogrammet varnar för politik som reduceras till dyrbar symbolpolitik. Att skriva in rättvis handel med krav på miljö, social trygghet och arbetsvillkor i målet ligger därför utanför vad planen åtar sig.
- free trade as EU coredecisive»EU:s fokus ska ligga på att lösa problem som Sverige inte kan hantera ensamt, till exempel handel, klimat, migration och säkerhet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The EU's focus should be on solving problems that Sweden cannot handle alone, for example trade, climate, migration and security.”
- deepened internal market»Fördjupa den inre marknaden, inte minst för tjänster och digitala produkter« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Deepen the internal market, not least for services and digital products”
- growth as priority»Arrangera ett EU-toppmöte om tillväxt under det svenska EU-ordförandeskapet i syfte att sätta i gång ett arbete med att få på plats en ny tillväxtstrategi för EU« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Arrange an EU summit on growth during Sweden's EU presidency with the aim of launching work to put in place a new growth strategy for the EU”
- no symbol politics»Klimatpolitiken får aldrig reduceras till dyrbar symbolpolitik eller snäv klimatnationalism.« (party programme ↗)“Climate policy must never be reduced to expensive symbol politics or narrow climate nationalism.”
The plan's trade policy commitment is to protect Swedish interests and strengthen Sweden's position in trade, and that evidence and Swedish competitiveness shall guide the implementation of climate targets rather than the desire to go first and furthest.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's trade policy commitment is to protect Swedish interests and strengthen Sweden's position in trade, and that evidence and Swedish competitiveness shall guide the implementation of climate targets rather than the desire to go first and furthest. The counter-proposal's requirement that the target explicitly should include fair trade with environmental, climate and labor condition requirements adds precisely the type of conditions the plan wants to avoid. The plan wants instead to stop symbolic politics that harms business.
Original (Swedish)
Planens handelspolitiska åtagande är att värna svenska intressen och stärka Sveriges ställning i handeln, och att evidens och svensk konkurrenskraft ska styra klimatmålens genomförande snarare än viljan att gå först och längst. Motförslagets krav på att målet uttryckligen ska omfatta rättvis handel med miljö-, klimat- och arbetsvillkorskrav lägger till just den typ av villkor planen vill undvika. Planen vill i stället stoppa symbolpolitik som drabbar näringslivet.
- Swedish interests in tradedecisive»Värna svenska intressen i frihandelsavtal« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Protect Swedish interests in free trade agreements”
- competitiveness guides climate targets»Evidens, resultat och svensk konkurrenskraft ska styra genomförandet av klimatmål i högre utsträckning än politikers vilja att gå först och längst.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Evidence, results and Swedish competitiveness shall guide the implementation of climate targets to a greater extent than politicians' desire to go first and furthest.”
- no to symbolic politics»Stoppa symbolpolitik som går ut över möjligheten att bedriva industri och näring« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Stop symbolic politics that harms the ability to conduct industry and business”
- strengthened trade position»Förbättra Sveriges ställning på den internationella marknaden och i handel« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Improve Sweden's position on the international market and in trade”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2025/26:NU1)
- Committee report full text (HD01NU1)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2025/26:3177 — Utgiftsområde 24 Näringsliv av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2025/26:3593 — Utgiftsområde 24 Näringsliv av Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:3736 — Utgiftsområde 24 Näringsliv? av Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2025/26:3782 — Utgiftsområde 24 Näringsliv av Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP)
- Proposition 2025/26:1 — Budgetpropositionen för 2026
Source: The Swedish Parliament