2025-06-102024/25:AU7 · p.6AULabour market
Labour disputes
Limits on the right to secondary (sympathy) industrial action
What's at stake: The issue concerns how much protection outside businesses — such as subcontractors and small firms — should have against the spillover effects of major labour-market conflicts, versus unions' ability to exert pressure through solidarity action. It touches on the balance of power between employers and unions on the Swedish labour market.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether unions' right to take sympathy action against companies not themselves party to a dispute should be limited by law, or whether the constitutionally protected right to industrial action should remain largely unchanged and continue to be a matter for labour-market parties.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee establishes that labour-market parties' right to take industrial action, including sympathy action, is fundamental to the Swedish labour-market model and a constitutionally protected right, even though it can have wide-ranging effects on outside parties too. The committee does not share the motioners' view that this right should be limited: the model has proven durable with comparatively few lost working days, the conflict rules were already revised in 2019 following an agreement between the parties, and it should, as far as possible, be up to the parties themselves — not the state — to decide when industrial action is warranted. The committee therefore sees no grounds to change the current arrangement.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 6 (C)
The Centre Party believes the Swedish labour-market model is fundamentally a strength, but that small businesses and subcontractors not party to a dispute — exemplified by the conflict between IF Metall and Tesla — should not be unreasonably hit by sympathy action from unrelated unions. The government should therefore propose that sympathy action such as blockades and strikes may only target the company where the original conflict is taking place, that those who take sympathy action must bear responsibility for minimizing harm to uninvolved companies, and that industrial action should not be usable to force companies that already have equivalent terms into a collective agreement.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 6 by C.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have held
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: LLiberalerna
Ja 278–17Ja 264–31
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | Yes | Yes 21/0/0/3 | match | confidence: high | explicit |
| S | Yes | Yes 93/0/0/13 | match | confidence: high | explicit |
| MP | Yes | Yes 14/0/0/4 | match | confidence: medium | derived |
| C | No | No 0/17/0/7 | match | confidence: medium | derived |
| L | No | Yes 14/0/0/2 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| KD | No | Yes 15/0/0/4 | differs | confidence: low | derived |
| M | No | Yes 60/0/0/8 | differs | confidence: low | not addressed |
| SD | Yes | Yes 60/0/0/12 | match | confidence: medium | derived |
Committee proposal
Parliament rejects the motions 2024/25:2004 by John E Weinerhall (M), 2024/25:2545 by Boriana Åberg (M) and 2024/25:2948 by Jonny Cato et al. (C) demands 10-12.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2024/25:2004 av John E Weinerhall (M), 2024/25:2545 av Boriana Åberg (M) och 2024/25:2948 av Jonny Cato m.fl. (C) yrkandena 10-12.
Riksdag decision: Parliament rejected approximately 70 proposals in motions from the general motion period 2024 concerning labour law and working time. The proposals address, for example, fixed-term employment, employment rate, seniority rules, right to leave and split shifts. Parliament refers inter alia to current provisions and to the parties' responsibility, that is to say trade unions and employer organizations, for regulating conditions in the labour market.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to limit sympathy actions so that they only target the company where the original conflict takes place. (C) — Reservation 6
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan wants to change labour dispute law in the direction of strengthening wage-earners' positions, not restricting them.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to change labour dispute law in the direction of strengthening wage-earners' positions, not restricting them. The counter-proposal instead requires that sympathy actions are restricted and that labour actions may not be used to drive forward collective agreements. It goes directly against the election manifesto's promise to defend the right to bargain and strong labour law and the requirement that all employees shall be protected by strong collective agreements.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill förändra konflikträtten i riktning mot att stärka löntagarnas positioner, inte begränsa dem. Motförslaget kräver tvärtom att sympatiåtgärder inskränks och att stridsåtgärder inte får användas för att driva fram kollektivavtal. Det går rakt emot valmanifestets löfte att försvara förhandlingsrätten och en stark arbetsrättslagstiftning och kravet att alla anställda ska skyddas av starka kollektivavtal.
- strengthened labour dispute lawdecisive»Vi vill förändra konflikträtten och annan lagstiftning för att« (party programme ↗)“We want to change labour dispute law and other legislation in order to”
- defended right to bargain»Vänsterpartiet kommer att fortsätta försvara förhandlingsrätten och en stark arbetsrättslagstiftning.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Left Party will continue to defend the right to bargain and strong labour law.”
- collective agreements for all employees»anställda i Sverige ska skyddas av starka kollektivavtal.« (party programme ↗)“employees in Sweden shall be protected by strong collective agreements.”
- politics shall not weaken one party»Men för att förhandlingarna ska vara rättvisa behöver politiken respektera den svenska modellen, där politiker inte hotar den ena parten med försämringar om den inte ger med sig.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“But for negotiations to be fair the politics needs to respect the Swedish model, where politicians do not threaten one party with worsening if it does not give in.”
The party programme explicitly lists the right of trade unions to take strike and sympathetic action among the goals to be defended.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme explicitly lists the right of trade unions to take strike and sympathetic action among the goals to be defended. The counter-proposal wants to restrict precisely sympathetic action and prohibit strike action to enforce collective agreements, which goes directly against that commitment. The plan instead wants to strengthen trade unions' position and make collective agreements the norm.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet listar uttryckligen rätten för fackliga organisationer att vidta strids- och sympatiåtgärder bland de mål som ska försvaras. Motförslaget vill begränsa just sympatiåtgärderna och förbjuda stridsåtgärder för att driva igenom kollektivavtal, vilket går rakt emot det åtagandet. Planen vill i stället stärka fackförbundens ställning och göra kollektivavtal till norm.
- right to sympathetic actiondecisive»Rätt för fackliga organisationer att vidta strids- och sympatiåtgärder.« (party programme ↗)“Right for trade unions to take strike and sympathetic action.”
- collective agreements as norm»Kollektivavtal som norm, försvar av den svenska modellen.« (party programme ↗)“Collective agreements as the norm, defence of the Swedish model.”
- stronger trade unions»Starkare ställning för fackförbunden för ökat löntagarinflytande.« (party programme ↗)“Stronger position for trade unions for increased worker influence.”
- right to collective organisation»Föreningsfrihet och rätt att organisera sig fackligt.« (party programme ↗)“Freedom of association and right to organise collectively.”
The plan protects the Swedish model where the parties themselves negotiate what should apply and wants to encourage union organisation and protect well-functioning labour law.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan protects the Swedish model where the parties themselves negotiate what should apply and wants to encourage union organisation and protect well-functioning labour law. To limit sympathy measures and the right to demand collective agreements through legislation would restrict exactly the party autonomy and union tools the plan protects. The counter-proposal's requirement is therefore rejected.
Original (Swedish)
Planen värnar den svenska modellen där parterna själva förhandlar fram vad som ska gälla och vill uppmuntra facklig organisering och värna en fungerande arbetsrätt. Att lagstiftningsvägen begränsa sympatiåtgärder och rätten att kräva kollektivavtal skulle inskränka just den partsautonomi och de fackliga verktyg planen slår vakt om. Motförslagets krav avvisas därför.
- party autonomy and collective agreementsdecisive»Vi värnar den svenska modellen där arbetsmarknadens parter gemensamt förhandlar fram vad som ska gälla på arbetsmarknaden genom kollektivavtal.« (party programme ↗)“We protect the Swedish model where labour market parties jointly negotiate what should apply on the labour market through collective agreements.”
- encouraged union organisation»Modellen bygger på att en hög andel av arbetstagarna är fackföreningsanslutna, och den fackliga organiseringen bör uppmuntras.« (party programme ↗)“The model is based on a high proportion of employees being union members, and union organisation should be encouraged.”
- protected labour law»Vi vill värna en fungerande arbetsrätt och ge arbetstagare inflytande över både arbetets innehåll och arbetstiden.« (party programme ↗)“We want to protect well-functioning labour law and give employees influence over both the content of work and working time.”
The election manifesto makes Centerpartiet the advocate for small businesses and the party programme requires clear and predictable rules in the economy as well as good conditions for self-employed and small businesses.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto makes Centerpartiet the advocate for small businesses and the party programme requires clear and predictable rules in the economy as well as good conditions for self-employed and small businesses. The counter-proposal's requirement that punitive measures should not hit uninvolved sub-contractors protects precisely those companies. The plan does not address the conflict rules directly, so the stance is derived.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet gör Centerpartiet till småföretagens företrädare och partiprogrammet kräver givna och förutsägbara spelregler i ekonomin samt goda villkor för egenföretagare och små företag. Motförslagets krav på att sympatiåtgärder inte ska slå mot oinblandade underleverantörer skyddar just de företagen. Planen behandlar inte konfliktreglerna direkt, varför ställningstagandet är härlett.
- advocate for small businessesdecisive»Därför kommer Centerpartiet alltid att vara småföretagens bästa vän i svensk politik.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Therefore, Centerpartiet will always be the best friend of small businesses in Swedish politics.”
- predictable rules»Ekonomin ska ha givna och förutsägbara spelregler« (party programme ↗)“The economy shall have clear and predictable rules”
- good conditions for small businesses»Goda villkor för entreprenörer, egenföretagare och små företag är därför avgörande för att skapa nya jobb.« (party programme ↗)“Good conditions for entrepreneurs, self-employed and small businesses are therefore crucial for creating new jobs.”
- simpler rules for companies»Rensa upp i regelträsket för entreprenörer, stora som små.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Clear up the regulatory maze for entrepreneurs, large and small.”
The plan explicitly requires a rule about reasonable proportion between the purpose of a industrial action and the means used, which is precisely the limitation the counter-proposal seeks when uninvolved parties are hit.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan explicitly requires a rule about reasonable proportion between the purpose of a industrial action and the means used, which is precisely the limitation the counter-proposal seeks when uninvolved parties are hit. It simultaneously values union freedom and collective agreements, so the requirement applies to proportionality and not to the right to strike as such. The plan's consistent concern for small businesses' conditions and fair competition points in the same direction.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver uttryckligen en regel om rimlig proportion mellan syftet med en stridsåtgärd och de medel som används, vilket är precis den begränsning motförslaget efterfrågar när oinblandade drabbas. Den värnar samtidigt den fackliga friheten och kollektivavtalen, så kravet gäller proportionalitet och inte konflikträtten som sådan. Planens genomgående omsorg om små företags villkor och konkurrens på lika villkor pekar åt samma håll.
- proportionality in industrial actiondecisive»behövs en regel om att det ska finnas en rimlig proportion mellan syftet och de använda« (party programme ↗)“there needs to be a rule that there be a reasonable proportion between the purpose and the means used”
- protected union freedom»Den fackliga friheten och möjligheten till kollektivavtal är en viktig del av förenings- och« (party programme ↗)“Union freedom and the possibility of collective agreements are an important part of freedom of association and”
- protect small businesses' conditions»Regelbördan för små företag ska minska« (party programme ↗)“The regulatory burden on small businesses shall decrease”
- fair competition»slå vakt om äganderätt, konkurrens på lika villkor, rättssäkerhet« (party programme ↗)“safeguard property rights, fair competition, legal certainty”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan wants labor law to give small businesses the opportunity to grow strong and makes fairness into a balance between all parties' interests, which speaks for uninvolved subcontractors not to bear the damage from a conflict they cannot influence.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants labor law to give small businesses the opportunity to grow strong and makes fairness into a balance between all parties' interests, which speaks for uninvolved subcontractors not to bear the damage from a conflict they cannot influence. At the same time, the plan establishes that strong and independent trade unions are indispensable and that the design shall be done by the parties themselves, which speaks against legal regulation. The basis is therefore weak and the position uncertain.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill att arbetsrätten ger små företag möjlighet att växa sig starka och gör rättvisa till en balans mellan alla parters intressen, vilket talar för att oinblandade underleverantörer inte ska bära skadan av en konflikt de inte kan påverka. Samtidigt slår planen fast att starka och oberoende fackföreningar är oundgängliga och att utformningen ska göras av parterna själva, vilket talar emot lagreglering. Underlaget är därför svagt och ställningstagandet osäkert.
- balance in labor lawdecisive»anställningsskydd för arbetstagaren, samtidigt som arbetsgivaren ska ha goda möjligheter att leda och för« (party programme ↗)“employment protection for the employee, while the employer shall have good opportunities to lead and for”
- value entrepreneurship»FLER FöRETAG« (2022 manifesto ↗)“MORE COMPANIES”
- strong trade unions»Starka och partipolitiskt oberoende fackföreningar« (party programme ↗)“Strong and politically independent trade unions”
- the parties' self-determination»Utformningen ska göras av arbetsmarknadens parter.« (party programme ↗)“The design shall be done by the labor market parties.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan does not address conflict law or solidarity measures.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan does not address conflict law or solidarity measures. The closest principle is that conditions for starting and growing should be good and that entrepreneurs have the same security as others, which speaks to uninvolved businesses not being affected by a conflict they cannot influence. Since the plan is silent on the substantive issue, the conclusion is uncertain and derived from general business policy commitments.
Original (Swedish)
Planen behandlar inte konflikträtten eller sympatiåtgärder. Närmast liggande princip är att villkoren för att starta och växa ska vara goda och att företagare har rätt till samma trygghet som andra, vilket talar för att oinblandade företag inte ska drabbas av en konflikt de inte kan påverka. Eftersom planen är tyst i sakfrågan är slutsatsen osäker och härledd ur allmänna näringspolitiska åtaganden.
- good conditions for businessdecisive»Villkoren för att starta, växa och expandera behöver vara goda« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Conditions for starting, growing and expanding need to be good”
- free business sector»Moderaterna vill bygga ett land där ett fritt näringsliv skapar ett välstånd som kommer alla till del.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Moderate Party wants to build a country where a free business sector creates prosperity that benefits all.”
- market economy and contractual freedom»Grunden för Sveriges välstånd är en marknadsekonomi baserad« (party programme ↗)“The basis for Sweden's prosperity is a market economy based”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan commits to defending the Swedish model and protecting Swedish employees' security and position in the labour market.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan commits to defending the Swedish model and protecting Swedish employees' security and position in the labour market. Limiting sympathy measures and the right to demand collective agreements by legislation disturbs the balance between the parties that the plan is built on. The plan emphasizes that stability is created by a well-balanced compromise between the parties, not by state intervention in conflict law.
Original (Swedish)
Planen åtar sig att försvara den svenska modellen och att värna svenska löntagares trygghet och ställning på arbetsmarknaden. Att lagstiftningsvägen begränsa sympatiåtgärder och rätten att kräva kollektivavtal rubbar den balans mellan parterna som planen bygger på. Planen betonar att stabiliteten skapas av en väl avvägd kompromiss mellan parterna, inte av statliga ingrepp i konflikträtten.
- defence of the Swedish modeldecisive»Försvara den svenska modellen« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Defend the Swedish model”
- employees' position protected»Svenska löntagares trygghet och ställning ska värnas på arbetsmarknaden« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Swedish employees' security and position shall be protected in the labour market”
- balance between the parties»Stabilitet förutsätter en god balans mellan arbetsmarknadens parter.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Stability requires a good balance between the parties in the labour market.”
- party autonomy»Sverigedemokraterna försvarar grunderna i den svenska modellen, där arbetsmarknadens parter genom förhandlingar gör upp om lönenivåer och andra centrala villkor.« (party programme ↗)“Sweden Democrats defend the foundations of the Swedish model, where the labour market parties through negotiations agree on wage levels and other central conditions.”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2024/25:AU7)
- Committee report full text (HC01AU7)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2024/25:1400 — En trygg familjepolitik med barnets bästa i fokus av Daniel Persson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1412 — Jämställdhet och diskriminering av Michael Rubbestad m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1469 — Bättre villkor för småföretagare av Tobias Andersson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1488 — Ett starkare integritetsskydd i ett föränderligt arbetsliv av Aida Birinxhiku (S)
- Motion 2024/25:1521 — Hyvling av arbetstid av Gunilla Carlsson och Dzenan Cisija (båda S)
- Motion 2024/25:1580 — En arbetsmarknad som skapar ekonomisk självständighet för kvinnor av Karin Sundin (S)
- Motion 2024/25:1926 — En starkare ekonomisk familjepolitik av Isabell Mixter m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2024/25:196 — En arbetsrätt för starka och trygga löntagare av Ciczie Weidby m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2024/25:2004 — Politisk strejk av John E Weinerhall (M)
- Motion 2024/25:2184 — Införande av heltid som norm på svensk arbetsmarknad av Zara Leghissa m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2024/25:2193 — Bättre villkor och arbetsmiljö även inom gig-ekonomin av Mattias Jonsson och Gunilla Carlsson (båda S)
- Motion 2024/25:2386 — Arbetsmarknad och arbetsliv av Magnus Persson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:2479 — Handling mot ofrivillig deltid av Sanna Backeskog m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2024/25:2545 — Garantera företagens avtalsfrihet av Boriana Åberg (M)
- Motion 2024/25:2624 — Föräldrars rätt till ersättning även under skoltid under vissa omständigheter av Märta Stenevi m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2024/25:2764 — Möjliggörande av dygnspass inom svensk blåljusverksamhet av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2024/25:2948 — Arbetsmarknad av Jonny Cato m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2024/25:3070 — Utgiftsområde 14 Arbetsmarknad och arbetsliv av Ardalan Shekarabi m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2024/25:3136 — Utgiftsområde 24 Näringsliv av Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2024/25:42 — Enskilda löntagares och arbetsgivares rätt att väcka talan i Arbetsdomstolen av Nima Gholam Ali Pour (SD)
Source: The Swedish Parliament