2025-02-262024/25:JuU21 · p.1JuUJustice

Government's bill

Continuing and expanding secret data interception against serious crime

What's at stake: The decision affects authorities' ability to combat serious crime such as drug trafficking, online sexual abuse of children and serious cyber intrusion, while also touching on the privacy of people whose devices could become subject to covert surveillance, in some cases even inside their own home.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

The question is whether the temporary law on secret data interception should continue to apply and be expanded to also help determine who may be suspected of a crime, or whether the proposal should be rejected in these respects.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The committee backs the government's proposal that the temporary law on secret data interception should continue to apply and that the possibility of using secret data interception to determine who may reasonably be suspected of a crime should be expanded, along with aligning the rules on surplus information with the code of judicial procedure, arguing that the evolving digital nature of crime and the use of encryption and anonymous services make the measures necessary and proportionate.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 1 (V)

The reservation (V) wants to reject the proposal to expand the use of secret data interception to determine who may be suspected of a crime, arguing that the measure - which includes letting authorities hack into phones and computers and activate their cameras, even inside someone's home - poses too great a risk of privacy intrusion against an indeterminate group of people; the reservation also wants to limit prosecutors' freedom to decide on the use of surplus information.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: adopting the government's legislative proposal and rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 1 by V.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
Vown reservationNoNo 0/19/0/5follows the planconfidence: highderived
SYesYes 92/0/0/14follows the planconfidence: highexplicit
MPNoYes 15/0/0/3departs from the planconfidence: highderived
CNoYes 20/1/0/3departs from the planconfidence: highderived
LYesYes 12/0/0/4follows the planconfidence: highexplicit
KDYesYes 15/0/0/4follows the planconfidence: mediumderived
MYesYes 60/0/0/8follows the planconfidence: mediumderived
SDYesYes 63/0/0/9follows the planconfidence: highderived

Broke with the party line

CMartin Ådahl (C, Stockholms kommun)No — party line: Yes

MPs whose vote differs from their party's majority position in this division. Marked with a dark ring in the chamber view.

Committee proposal

The Parliament adopts the Government's proposal for 1. law on amendment to the law (2000:562) on international legal assistance in criminal matters, 2. law on both continued validity of the law (2020:62) on secret data interception, and amendment to the same law, 3. law on amendment to the law (2020:62) on secret data interception, 4. law on amendment to the law (2024:326) on secret coercive measures for the purpose of implementing custodial penalties, 5. law on amendment to the law (2024:332) on amendment to the law (2024:326) on secret coercive measures for the purpose of implementing custodial penalties. Thereby the Parliament approves proposition 2024/25:51 points 1-5 and rejects motion 2024/25:3271 by Gudrun Nordborg et al. (V) claims 4 and 5.

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen antar regeringens förslag till 1. lag om ändring i lagen (2000:562) om internationell rättslig hjälp i brottmål, 2. lag om dels fortsatt giltighet av lagen (2020:62) om hemlig dataavläsning, dels ändring i samma lag, 3. lag om ändring i lagen (2020:62) om hemlig dataavläsning, 4. lag om ändring i lagen (2024:326) om hemliga tvångsmedel i syfte att verkställa frihetsberövande påföljder, 5. lag om ändring i lagen (2024:332) om ändring i lagen (2024:326) om hemliga tvångsmedel i syfte att verkställa frihetsberövande påföljder. Därmed bifaller riksdagen proposition 2024/25:51 punkterna 1-5 och avslår motion 2024/25:3271 av Gudrun Nordborg m.fl. (V) yrkandena 4 och 5.

Riksdag decision: The Parliament said yes to the Government's proposal that secret data interception against serious crimes shall remain permitted. The proposal means that certain rules are clarified and in certain cases the possibility to use secret data interception is expanded. The proposal means among other things: The law shall apply without time limitation. Secret data interception shall be permitted in more cases for the purpose of investigating who can reasonably be suspected of a crime. The rules for which types of information may be collected shall be clarified. The rules for the formulation of an authorization for secret data interception shall be clarified. Surplus information that has emerged through secret data interception shall be permitted to be used for other purposes. Legal security for the individual shall be strengthened. Among other things through improved opportunities for insight and supervision. Current legislation ends on 31 March 2025. The law amendments are proposed to come into force on 1 April 2025. The Parliament also said no to several motions, of which one proposal in a motion that was submitted during the general motion period 2024.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietNoNofollows the planderived

The plan establishes that all people have the right to protection of their personal integrity, that the constitution shall protect freedoms and rights and that crime prevention shall be legally secure.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan establishes that all people have the right to protection of their personal integrity, that the constitution shall protect freedoms and rights and that crime prevention shall be legally secure. Expanding covert data collection to map who can be suspected — with camera activation in residences — affects an undefined group and conflicts with the presumption of innocence. To reject the expansion and limit the use of surplus information follows from the plan's rule-of-law perspective.

Original (Swedish)

Planen slår fast att alla människor har rätt till skydd av sin personliga integritet, att grundlagarna ska värna fri- och rättigheter och att brottsbekämpning ska vara rättssäker. Att utöka hemlig dataavläsning till att kartlägga vem som kan misstänkas — med kameraaktivering i bostäder — träffar en obestämd krets och står i konflikt med presumtionen om oskuld. Att avvisa utvidgningen och begränsa användningen av överskottsinformation följer av planens rättsstatssyn.

  • protection of personal integritydecisive»har rätt till skydd av sin personliga integritet.« (party programme ↗)“have the right to protection of their personal integrity.”
  • the presumption of innocence»anses oskyldiga tills motsatsen är bevisad är grundläggande i det.« (party programme ↗)“are presumed innocent until the contrary is proven is fundamental in it.”
  • constitutionally protected rights»Grundlagarna ska värna demokratin och människors fri- och« (party programme ↗)“The constitution shall protect democracy and people's freedom and”
  • legally secure crime prevention»kunna agera samlat, effektivt och rättssäkert för att förhindra brott« (party programme ↗)“be able to act collectively, effectively and legally securely to prevent crime”
SSocialdemokraternaYesYesfollows the planexplicit

The plan explicitly states that police need more tools, such as better opportunities for wiretapping, and that the fight against crime shall be uncompromising; intelligence capacity shall be developed.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan explicitly states that police need more tools, such as better opportunities for wiretapping, and that the fight against crime shall be uncompromising; intelligence capacity shall be developed. Opposing expanded secret data monitoring to investigate who may be suspected of crime goes against that commitment. Privacy protection is a limit in the plan, but does not outweigh here.

Original (Swedish)

Planen säger uttryckligen att polisen behöver fler verktyg, som bättre möjligheter till avlyssning, och att kampen mot kriminaliteten ska vara kompromisslös; underrättelseförmågan ska utvecklas. Att motsätta sig utökad hemlig dataavläsning för att utreda vem som kan misstänkas för brott går emot det åtagandet. Integritetsskyddet är en gräns i planen, men väger här inte över.

  • more tools for policedecisive»Polisen behöver också fler verktyg, som bättre möjligheter till avlyssning och husrannsakan.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Police also need more tools, such as better opportunities for wiretapping and house searches.”
  • uncompromising crime-fighting»Kampen mot kriminaliteten ska vara kompromisslös.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The fight against crime shall be uncompromising.”
  • developed intelligence capacity»Vi vill fortsätta internationella samarbeten och utveckla cyberförsvaret och underrättelseförmågan.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to continue international cooperation and develop cyber defence and intelligence capacity.”
  • personal privacy as limit»Det är samhällets absoluta skyldighet att skydda friheten och den personliga integriteten« (party programme ↗)“It is society's absolute duty to protect freedom and personal privacy”
MPMiljöpartietNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The plan opposes all laws that constitute disproportionate intrusions on privacy and requires that policy protects people's ability to protect their privacy as surveillance capabilities increase.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan opposes all laws that constitute disproportionate intrusions on privacy and requires that policy protects people's ability to protect their privacy as surveillance capabilities increase. Crime prevention is important but must not come at the expense of human rights. To oppose extended secret data access against an indefinite group of persons and to limit the use of excess information therefore aligns with the plan.

Original (Swedish)

Planen motsätter sig alla lagar som innebär oproportionerliga ingrepp i integriteten och kräver att politiken slår vakt om människors möjlighet att värna sin integritet när övervakningsmöjligheterna ökar. Brottsbekämpning är viktig men får inte ske på bekostnad av mänskliga rättigheter. Att motsätta sig utökad hemlig dataavläsning mot en obestämd krets personer och att begränsa användningen av överskottsinformation ligger därför i linje med planen.

  • no disproportionate privacy intrusionsdecisive»alla lagar som innebär oproportionerliga ingrepp i« (party programme ↗)“all laws that constitute disproportionate intrusions on”
  • rights before crime prevention»viktigt men ska inte ske på bekostnad av mänskliga« (party programme ↗)“important but shall not be at the expense of human”
  • protect privacy against surveillance»kräver att politiken slår vakt om människors« (party programme ↗)“requires that policy protects people's”
  • right to privacy and private life»Vi vill värna människors rätt till integritet och« (party programme ↗)“We want to protect people's right to privacy and”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

CCenterpartietNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The election manifesto explicitly rejects preventive surveillance and other far-reaching coercive measures and establishes that the rule of law and the individual's rights against the state must be defended.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The election manifesto explicitly rejects preventive surveillance and other far-reaching coercive measures and establishes that the rule of law and the individual's rights against the state must be defended. Expanding secret data reading to investigate who may be suspected of a crime, with the ability to activate a camera in someone's home, is precisely such an intrusion against an indeterminate group. The party programme's proportionality requirement means that the plan supports the objection, even though secret data reading is not mentioned as such.

Original (Swedish)

Valmanifestet säger uttryckligen nej till preventiv avlyssning och andra långtgående tvångsmedel och slår fast att rättsstaten och individens rättigheter gentemot staten måste försvaras. Att utöka hemlig dataavläsning till att utreda vem som kan misstänkas för brott, med möjlighet att aktivera kameran i någons bostad, är precis ett sådant ingrepp mot en obestämd krets. Partiprogrammets proportionalitetskrav gör att planen stöder invändningen, även om hemlig dataavläsning inte nämns i sig.

  • no to preventive surveillancedecisive»Rättsstaten och individens rättigheter gentemot staten måste försvaras. Vi säger därför nej till visitationszoner, kollektiv bestraffning, omvänd bevisbörda, anonyma vittnen, preventiv avlyssning och inskränkningar av religionsfriheten.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The rule of law and the individual's rights against the state must be defended. We therefore reject stop-and-search zones, collective punishment, reversed burden of proof, anonymous witnesses, preventive surveillance, and restrictions on religious freedom.”
  • proportionality requirementweak support»All lagstiftning bör prövas mot dess påverkan på människors personliga integritet. Det måste finnas en proportionalitet mellan lagstiftningens inskränkning av medborgarnas integritet och lagarnas syfte.« (party programme ↗)“All legislation should be tested against its impact on people's personal integrity. There must be proportionality between the legislation's restriction of citizens' integrity and the laws' purpose.”
  • integrity as a cornerstone»Respekten för den enskildes personliga integritet är en grundsten i varje demokrati.« (party programme ↗)“Respect for the individual's personal integrity is a cornerstone of every democracy.”
  • protection in the digital sphere»Vi bejakar ett digitalt samhälle med ett starkt skydd för yttrande- och informationsfrihet« (party programme ↗)“We embrace a digital society with strong protection for freedom of speech and information”

flags: citat_svagt

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

LLiberalernaYesYesfollows the planexplicit

The election manifesto explicitly requires that wiretapping and other secret coercive measures may be used when suspecting more crimes than today and, following court decision, against organised gang members even without concrete suspicion of crime.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The election manifesto explicitly requires that wiretapping and other secret coercive measures may be used when suspecting more crimes than today and, following court decision, against organised gang members even without concrete suspicion of crime. The counter-proposal's requirement that secret data reading not be expanded to investigating who can be suspected runs directly counter to this commitment. The plan's requirement that breaches of integrity are only justified when the opposing interest weighs manifestly heavier qualifies matters, but the clarification of serious crimes is in the plan precisely such an interest.

Original (Swedish)

Valmanifestet kräver uttryckligen att avlyssning och andra hemliga tvångsmedel ska kunna användas vid misstanke om fler brott än i dag och, efter domstolsbeslut, mot organiserade gängmedlemmar även utan konkret brottsmisstanke. Motförslagets krav att inte utöka hemlig dataavläsning till att utreda vem som kan misstänkas går rakt emot detta åtagande. Planens krav att integritetsintrång bara är berättigade när det motstående intresset väger uppenbart tyngre kvalificerar, men uppklaringen av grov brottslighet är i planen just ett sådant intresse.

  • coercive measures without concrete suspiciondecisive»Avlyssning och andra hemliga tvångsmedel ska kunna användas både vid misstanke om fler brott än i dag och efter domstolsbeslut mot organiserade gängmedlemmar även utan konkret brottsmisstanke.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Wiretapping and other secret coercive measures may be used both when suspecting more crimes than today and following court decision against organised gang members even without concrete suspicion of crime.”
  • more tools for the police»Ge polisen fler verktyg och vapen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Give the police more tools and weapons.”
  • more efficient crime investigation»Rättsväsendets förmåga och effektivitet behöver förbättras så att« (party programme ↗)“The capacity and efficiency of the justice system needs to be improved so that”
  • proportionality requirement»negativt är endast berättigade om ett motstående intresse väger uppenbart tyngre och åtgärden är« (party programme ↗)“negative is only justified if an opposing interest weighs manifestly heavier and the measure is”
KDKristdemokraternaYesYesfollows the planderived

The party programme requires that Sweden can meet attacks from international crime and terrorism and that all crimes are effectively investigated, and the election manifesto wants a total review of secrecy rules so that crimes can be cleared up.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The party programme requires that Sweden can meet attacks from international crime and terrorism and that all crimes are effectively investigated, and the election manifesto wants a total review of secrecy rules so that crimes can be cleared up. Expanded secret data interception to investigate who can be suspected is such a tool against encrypted and digital crime. The plan's requirement for great caution with personal integrity sets limits for application, but does not support the counter-proposal's requirement to reject the expansion.

Original (Swedish)

Partiprogrammet kräver att Sverige kan möta angrepp från internationell kriminalitet och terrorism och att alla brott effektivt beivras, och valmanifestet vill se en total översyn av sekretessreglerna för att kunna klara upp brott. Utökad hemlig dataavläsning för att utreda vem som kan misstänkas är ett sådant verktyg mot krypterad och digital brottslighet. Planens krav på stor försiktighet med den personliga integriteten sätter gränser för tillämpningen, men bär inte motförslagets krav på att avslå utökningen.

  • meet terrorism and crimedecisive»möta angrepp från internationell kriminalitet, terrorism« (party programme ↗)“meet attacks from international crime, terrorism”
  • all crimes shall be investigated»Alla brott ska effektivt och utan undantag beivras« (party programme ↗)“All crimes shall be effectively and without exception investigated”
  • tools to clear up crimes»Total översyn av sekretessreglerna, så att myndigheter kan dela uppgifter mellan sig för att förebygga och klara upp brott.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Total review of secrecy rules, so that agencies can share information with each other to prevent and clear up crimes.”
  • caution with personal data»försiktighet och respekt för den personliga integriteten« (party programme ↗)“caution and respect for personal integrity”
MModeraternaYesYesfollows the planderived

The plan wants to strengthen the justice system so more crimes are solved and adapt legislation to gang criminality, citing that only one of four gang murders was solved.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan wants to strengthen the justice system so more crimes are solved and adapt legislation to gang criminality, citing that only one of four gang murders was solved. To restrict secret data access and the use of excess information goes in the opposite direction when crime is digital and encrypted. The plan's demand that integrity be safeguarded speaks for legally secure frameworks, not for restricting the tool.

Original (Swedish)

Planen vill rusta upp rättsväsendet så att fler brott klaras upp och anpassa lagstiftningen efter gängbrottsligheten, med hänvisning till att bara ett av fyra gängmord klarades upp. Att begränsa hemlig dataavläsning och användningen av överskottsinformation drar i motsatt riktning när brottsligheten är digital och krypterad. Planens krav på att integriteten värnas talar för rättssäkra ramar, inte för att verktyget stryps.

  • more crimes should be solveddecisive»Vi ska rusta upp rättsväsendet för att utreda och klara upp fler brott« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We shall strengthen the justice system to investigate and solve more crimes”
  • legislation adapted against gangs»Gängen är Sveriges inhemska terrorister – och lagstiftningen måste anpassas därefter så att fler ställs till svars och försvinner från gatan.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Gangs are Sweden's domestic terrorists – and legislation must be adapted accordingly so that more are brought to justice and disappear from the streets.”
  • low solve rate must be broken»Under 2020 klarades endast 1 av 4 av alla gängmord upp.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“In 2020, only 1 of 4 of all gang murders were solved.”
  • integrity safeguarded»Den personliga integriteten ska värnas« (party programme ↗)“Personal integrity shall be safeguarded”
SDSverigedemokraternaYesYesfollows the planderived

The plan requires that the justice system gets more effective tools against gang crime and explicitly mentions information gathering, surveillance and wiretapping as means, and that procedural obstacles are removed.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan requires that the justice system gets more effective tools against gang crime and explicitly mentions information gathering, surveillance and wiretapping as means, and that procedural obstacles are removed. It states that few measures are too far-reaching against gangs. The counter-proposal's demand to limit secret data access on privacy grounds therefore conflicts with the plan.

Original (Swedish)

Planen kräver att rättsväsendet får mer effektiva verktyg mot gängbrott och nämner uttryckligen informationsinhämtning, spaning och avlyssning som medel, samt att processuella hinder undanröjs. Den slår fast att få åtgärder är för långtgående mot gängen. Motförslagets krav på att begränsa hemlig dataavläsning av integritetsskäl strider därför mot planen.

  • wiretapping and surveillancedecisive»Åtgärder ska vidtas för att bättre kunna kartlägga gängaktiva genom t.ex. underrättelsearbete och informationsinhämtning, spaning, kameraövervakning och avlyssning.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Measures shall be taken to better map gang-active individuals through e.g. intelligence work and information gathering, surveillance, camera surveillance and wiretapping.”
  • effective tools against gang crime»Framförallt behöver rättsväsendet få mer effektiva verktyg för att bekämpa gängbrott.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Above all, the justice system needs more effective tools to combat gang crime.”
  • remove obstacles to prosecution»Processuella hinder för att möjliggöra en ökad lagföring måste också undanröjas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Procedural obstacles to enable increased prosecution must also be removed.”
  • uncompromising against gangs»Sverigedemokraterna anser att få politiska åtgärder är för långtgående när det kommer till att pressa tillbaka både de kriminella gängen och den kultur som gör att de får fäste.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden Democrats believe that few political measures are too far-reaching when it comes to pressing back both the criminal gangs and the culture that causes them to gain a foothold.”

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament