2025-05-222024/25:MJU19 · p.1MJUEnvironment & agriculture
Comprehensive measures
Ecosystem-based fisheries management and the mandate of the marine and water authority
What's at stake: This determines how quickly ecosystem-based fisheries management is introduced, affecting the recovery of fish stocks — such as Baltic cod — and whether public funds keep subsidizing a fishing fleet with overcapacity.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
Whether current EU-level work and existing agency mandates are enough to protect marine ecosystems, or whether the marine and water authority's instruction should be tightened and Sweden should push to remove harmful subsidies that contribute to overfishing.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee shares the view that the ecosystem approach should be strengthened through better research and welcomes the Commission's call on member states along with the special group supporting implementation; it points to the government's already ongoing work within the EU, Baltfish, and Scheveningen and to the mandates already given to the marine and water authority, and therefore considers the motions already addressed.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 2 (MP)
The reservation wants the ecosystems themselves to set the limits on fishing and wants the marine and water authority's instruction changed so that an ecosystem approach and coordinated EU environmental responsibility are made explicit, along with Sweden actively working within the EU and WTO to remove harmful subsidies that create fleet overcapacity and contribute to overfishing, such as of cod in the Baltic Sea.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 2 by MP.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have held
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: LLiberalerna
Ja 256–14Ja 245–25
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Yes 18/0/0/6 | differs | confidence: high | derived |
| S | No | Yes 89/0/0/17 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| MP | No | No 0/14/0/4 | match | confidence: high | explicit |
| C | No | Abstain 0/0/21/3 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| L | No | Yes 11/0/0/5 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: medium | explicit |
| KD | No | Yes 15/0/0/4 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| M | No | Yes 58/0/0/10 | differs | confidence: low | not addressed |
| SD | No | Yes 63/0/0/9 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2024/25:986 by Louise Eklund (L) request 2, 2024/25:987 by Malin Danielsson et al. (L) request 5, 2024/25:2486 by Stina Larsson et al. (C) request 11.2, 2024/25:2954 by Muharrem Demirok et al. (C) request 44.2 and 2024/25:3037 by Daniel Helldén et al. (MP) requests 66.1, 72 and 89.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2024/25:986 av Louise Eklund (L) yrkande 2, 2024/25:987 av Malin Danielsson m.fl. (L) yrkande 5, 2024/25:2486 av Stina Larsson m.fl. (C) yrkande 11.2, 2024/25:2954 av Muharrem Demirok m.fl. (C) yrkande 44.2 och 2024/25:3037 av Daniel Helldén m.fl. (MP) yrkandena 66.1, 72 och 89.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag rejected approximately 100 proposals on fisheries policy from motions during the general motion period of 2024. The Riksdag primarily refers to work already underway in the issues the proposals address. The proposals concern, among other things, sustainable fish stocks, measures to protect the Swedish fishing industry, control and sanctions.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants an ecosystem-based marine management to be introduced and integrated with sustainable management of fish resources. (MP) — Reservation 2
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan requires conscious and comprehensive work for rich ecosystems and ambitious environmental goals that are followed up with sharp legislation, and states that constant overexploitation of nature's resources depletes biodiversity.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires conscious and comprehensive work for rich ecosystems and ambitious environmental goals that are followed up with sharp legislation, and states that constant overexploitation of nature's resources depletes biodiversity. That ecosystems set the limits for fishing, that the authority's instruction is clarified and that harmful subsidies that create overcapacity are driven out follows from that.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver ett medvetet och heltäckande arbete för rika ekosystem och ambitiösa miljömål som följs upp med skarp lagstiftning, och konstaterar att ett ständigt överutnyttjande av naturens resurser utarmar den biologiska mångfalden. Att ekosystemen sätter gränserna för fisket, att myndighetens instruktion förtydligas och att skadliga subventioner som ger överkapacitet drivs bort följer av det.
- rich ecosystemsdecisive»skapa goda villkor för rika ekosystem, bland annat genom att återställa« (party programme ↗)“create good conditions for rich ecosystems, among other things by restoring”
- ambitious environmental goals»miljömål som följs upp med skarp lagstiftning och praktiskt arbete.« (party programme ↗)“environmental goals that are followed up with sharp legislation and practical work.”
- overexploitation depletes nature»Ett ständigt överutnyttjande av naturens resurser leder till kraftig utarmning av den biologiska mångfalden och växthusgasutsläpp.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Constant overexploitation of nature's resources leads to severe depletion of biodiversity and greenhouse gas emissions.”
- protect biodiversity»Vi måste lösa klimatkrisen och skydda den biologiska mångfalden« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We must solve the climate crisis and protect biodiversity”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The party programme establishes that natural resources and ecosystems are exploited beyond the limit of long-term sustainability and requires that biological diversity is protected and that fisheries policy is reformed with environmental considerations as the starting point.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme establishes that natural resources and ecosystems are exploited beyond the limit of long-term sustainability and requires that biological diversity is protected and that fisheries policy is reformed with environmental considerations as the starting point. Letting ecosystems set the limits and phasing out subsidies that create overcapacity follows directly from this. The election manifesto warns of species extinction. The plan therefore supports the counter-proposal's requirement.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet konstaterar att naturtillgångar och ekosystem utnyttjas över gränsen för det långsiktigt hållbara och kräver att den biologiska mångfalden skyddas samt att fiskeripolitiken läggs om med miljöhänsyn som utgångspunkt. Att låta ekosystemen sätta gränserna och driva bort subventioner som ger överkapacitet följer direkt av detta. Valmanifestet varnar för artdöden. Planen stöder därför motförslagets krav.
- ecosystems within sustainable limitsdecisive»naturtillgångar och ekosystem utnyttjas i dag över gränsen för det långsiktigt hållbara, och« (party programme ↗)“natural resources and ecosystems are today exploited beyond the limit of long-term sustainability, and”
- protect biological diversity»biologiska mångfalden måste skyddas.« (party programme ↗)“biological diversity must be protected.”
- reformed fisheries policy»också en omläggning av jordbruks- och fiskeripolitiken. Konsumentperspektivet, inte« (party programme ↗)“also a reform of agricultural and fisheries policy. The consumer perspective, not”
- halt species extinction»Samtidigt accelererar artdöden och den biologiska mångfalden hotas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“At the same time species extinction is accelerating and biological diversity is threatened.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto demands verbatim that the ecosystems in the oceans set the limits for how much fish can be caught and that ecosystem-based marine management is introduced.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto demands verbatim that the ecosystems in the oceans set the limits for how much fish can be caught and that ecosystem-based marine management is introduced. The party programme wants Sweden to be driving for fishing that does not extract more than regrowth, and the manifesto wants to phase out harmful subsidies. The counter-proposal's requirement is thus the plan's own line.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet kräver ordagrant att ekosystemen i haven ska sätta gränserna för hur mycket fisk som får fångas och att en ekosystembaserad havsförvaltning införs. Partiprogrammet vill att Sverige är pådrivande för ett fiske som inte tar ut mer än återväxten, och manifestet vill fasa ut skadliga subventioner. Motförslagets krav är därmed planens egen linje.
- ecosystems set the limitsdecisive»låt ekosystemen i haven sätta gränserna för hur mycket fisk som får fångas, inför en ekosystembaserad havsförvaltning och gå över till skonsamma fiskemetoder.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“let the ecosystems in the oceans set the limits for how much fish can be caught, introduce ecosystem-based marine management and switch to sustainable fishing methods.”
- driving against overfishing»Sverige ska vara pådrivande inom EU och globala organisationer för ett ansvarsfullt fiske som återuppbygger utfiskade bestånd och inte tar ut mer än återväxten.« (party programme ↗)“Sweden shall be leading within the EU and global organisations for responsible fishing that rebuilds depleted stocks and does not extract more than regrowth.”
- eliminate harmful subsidies»fasa ut fossila subventioner.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“phase out harmful subsidies.”
- protected marine areas»skydda minst 30 procent av världens hav.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“protect at least 30 per cent of the world's oceans.”
The election manifesto requires that Sweden's lakes, watercourses and seas be saved and that harmful bottom trawling be prevented from destroying the marine environment, and the party programme that biodiversity be protected so that ecosystems can survive.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto requires that Sweden's lakes, watercourses and seas be saved and that harmful bottom trawling be prevented from destroying the marine environment, and the party programme that biodiversity be protected so that ecosystems can survive. Allowing ecosystems to set the limits for fishing follows from this. The plan also explicitly wants to use trade policy to cut harmful subsidies internationally.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet kräver att Sveriges sjöar, vattendrag och hav räddas och att skadlig bottentrålning inte får förstöra havsmiljön, och partiprogrammet att biologisk mångfald skyddas för att ekosystemen ska fortleva. Att låta ekosystemen sätta gränserna för fisket följer av detta. Planen vill dessutom uttryckligen använda handelspolitiken för att kapa skadliga subventioner internationellt.
- stop harmful fishingdecisive»Skadlig bottentrålning ska inte få förstöra för varken havsmiljön, den småskaliga fiskenäringen eller sportfisket.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Harmful bottom trawling shall not be allowed to damage the marine environment, small-scale fishing or sport fishing.”
- ecosystems set the limits»Att skydda den biologiska mångfalden är nödvändigt för att ekosystemen ska kunna fortleva.« (party programme ↗)“Protecting biodiversity is necessary for ecosystems to survive.”
- save the marine environment»Rädda Sveriges sjöar, vattendrag och hav.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Save Sweden's lakes, watercourses and seas.”
- away with harmful subsidies»Vi ska använda handelspolitiken för att kapa fossila subventioner runtom i världen och pressa stora utsläppare som Kina att stänga ner sina kolkraftverk.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We will use trade policy to cut fossil subsidies around the world and pressure major emitters like China to shut down their coal power plants.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan requires that fishing is conducted in a long-term sustainable manner and is kept within scientific assessments of what the stocks can sustain, that industrial fishing is limited and that seas are protected through agreements between coastal states.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that fishing is conducted in a long-term sustainable manner and is kept within scientific assessments of what the stocks can sustain, that industrial fishing is limited and that seas are protected through agreements between coastal states. It also wants to phase out market-distorting support. Letting ecosystems set the boundaries and eliminating subsidies that create overcapacity therefore aligns with the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att fisket bedrivs långsiktigt hållbart och hålls inom vetenskapliga bedömningar av vad bestånden tål, att industrifisket begränsas och att haven skyddas genom avtal mellan kuststaterna. Den vill också fasa ut marknadsstörande stöd. Att låta ekosystemen sätta gränserna och driva bort subventioner som ger överkapacitet ligger därför i linje med planen.
- fishing within scientific limitsdecisive»Fisket måste bedrivas på ett långsiktigt hållbart sätt och hålla sig inom ramen för vetenskapliga« (party programme ↗)“Fishing must be conducted in a long-term sustainable manner and stay within the framework of scientific”
- limited industrial fishing»Kampen mot övergödningen ska fortsätta, industrifisket ska begränsas och de mest värdefulla havsområdena skyddas som marina reservat.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The fight against eutrophication shall continue, industrial fishing shall be limited and the most valuable maritime areas shall be protected as marine reserves.”
- eliminate market-distorting support»EU:s jordbrukspolitik behöver reformeras i grunden. Samtliga direktstöd och marknadsstörande« (party programme ↗)“The EU's agricultural policy needs fundamental reform. All direct supports and market-distorting”
- sea protection through agreements»Sverige omges av hav som behöver skyddas genom avtal mellan alla kuststater.« (party programme ↗)“Sweden is surrounded by seas that need to be protected through agreements between all coastal states.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan establishes that excessively large fish catches benefit no one but only cause the supply to dwindle and the industry to die out, and that fishing shall be conducted according to the stewardship principle.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that excessively large fish catches benefit no one but only cause the supply to dwindle and the industry to die out, and that fishing shall be conducted according to the stewardship principle. Allowing ecosystems to set the limits and opposing subsidies that create overcapacity follows directly from this. The plan also rejects direct business subsidies as a principle.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att ett alltför omfattande fiskeuttag gynnar ingen utan bara får tillgången att sina och näringen att dö ut, och att fisket ska bedrivas enligt förvaltarskapsprincipen. Att låta ekosystemen sätta gränserna och motverka subventioner som skapar överkapacitet följer direkt av detta. Planen avvisar dessutom direkta företagssubventioner som princip.
- counter overfishingdecisive»Ett alltför omfattande fiskeuttag gynnar ingen utan resulterar endast i att tillgången sinar och att näringen på lång sikt dör ut.« (party programme ↗)“Excessively large fish catches benefit no one but only result in the supply dwindling and the industry dying out in the long term.”
- stewardship in fishing»Fisket ska i likhet med allt annat nyttjande av naturresurser ske med hänsyn till förvaltarskapsprincipen.« (party programme ↗)“Fishing shall, like all other use of natural resources, be conducted with regard to the stewardship principle.”
- biological diversity and ecosystems»Att slå vakt om den biologiska mångfalden är viktigt av många skäl. Mångfalden är en förutsättning för ekosystemens långsiktiga produktionsförmåga.« (party programme ↗)“Protecting biological diversity is important for many reasons. Diversity is a prerequisite for the long-term productive capacity of ecosystems.”
- no to harmful subsidies»Direkta företagssubventioner avvisas.« (party programme ↗)“Direct business subsidies are rejected.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan wants to take strong action for the marine and aquatic environment and stem the decline in herring and sprat stocks by moving the trawling boundary, and the party programme points to overfishing as a threat to a living marine environment.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to take strong action for the marine and aquatic environment and stem the decline in herring and sprat stocks by moving the trawling boundary, and the party programme points to overfishing as a threat to a living marine environment. The counter-proposal's demand for a clearer ecosystem approach and that subsidies creating overcapacity are eliminated go in the same direction. The plan's principle that humans are the starting point for environmental policy qualifies, however, how far this can be taken.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill vidta kraftfulla åtgärder för havs- och vattenmiljön och stävja minskningen av sill- och strömmingsbestånden genom att flytta ut trålgränsen, och partiprogrammet pekar ut utfiskning som ett hot mot en levande havsmiljö. Motförslagets krav på en tydligare ekosystemansats och på att subventioner som ger överkapacitet drivs bort går i samma riktning. Planens princip att människan är miljöpolitikens utgångspunkt kvalificerar dock hur långt detta kan drivas.
- stop overfishing in the Baltic Seadecisive»Stävja minskningen av sill-/strömmingsbestånden i Östersjön genom att flytta gränsen för trålfiske från fyra till tolv nautiska mil« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Stem the decline in herring/sprat stocks in the Baltic Sea by moving the trawling boundary from four to twelve nautical miles”
- strong action for the marine environment»Moderaterna vill vidta kraftfulla åtgärder för att förbättra havs- och vattenmiljön.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Moderate Party wants to take strong action to improve the marine and aquatic environment.”
- overfishing threatens the marine environment»utfiskning slår mot en levande havsmiljö« (party programme ↗)“overfishing threatens a living marine environment”
- humans as the starting point»Människan måste vara miljöpolitikens utgångspunkt.« (party programme ↗)“Humans must be the starting point of environmental policy.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto states that the sea and water environment must be prioritized more clearly over overly intensive fishing and wants to increase the pace of work to restore the Baltic Sea's marine environment.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto states that the sea and water environment must be prioritized more clearly over overly intensive fishing and wants to increase the pace of work to restore the Baltic Sea's marine environment. The plan also emphasizes that international cooperation between Baltic Sea countries is required. The counter-proposal's demands that ecosystems set the limits for fishing and that harmful subsidies are eliminated are in line with this.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet slår fast att havs- och vattenmiljön måste prioriteras tydligare framför ett alltför intensivt fiske och vill öka takten i arbetet med att återställa Östersjöns havsmiljö. Planen framhåller också att internationell samverkan mellan östersjöländerna krävs. Motförslagets krav på att ekosystemen sätter gränserna för fisket och att skadliga subventioner drivs bort ligger i linje med detta.
- environment before intensive fishingdecisive»Vår havs- och vattenmiljö måste prioriteras tydligare framför ett allt för intensivt fiske och omfattande vindkraftsutbyggnad.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Our sea and water environment must be prioritized more clearly over overly intensive fishing and extensive wind power expansion.”
- restored marine environment»Öka takten i arbetet med att återställa havsmiljön i Östersjön« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Increase the pace of work to restore the marine environment in the Baltic Sea”
- serious situation in the Baltic Sea»Situationen vad gäller övergödning och gifter i Östersjön är allvarligt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The situation regarding eutrophication and toxins in the Baltic Sea is serious.”
- international cooperation»Mer fokus måste i detta sammanhang satsas på internationell samverkan mellan östersjöländerna då Sverige inte ensamt kan bidra till att lösa situationen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“More focus must in this context be placed on international cooperation between Baltic Sea countries since Sweden alone cannot contribute to solving the situation.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2024/25:MJU19)
- Committee report full text (HC01MJU19)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2024/25:1019 — Rädda sillen, trålfiskeförbud för Östersjön och klimatet av Kerstin Lundgren (C)
- Motion 2024/25:1025 — Det småskaliga kustnära fisket efter Norrlandskusten av Anders W Jonsson (C)
- Motion 2024/25:1033 — Undervattensjakt i Sverige - lärdomar från våra nordiska grannländer av Magnus Berntsson (KD)
- Motion 2024/25:1039 — Utveckling av selektiva redskap för yrkesfisket av Roland Utbult (KD)
- Motion 2024/25:1303 — Flodkräftans bevarande av Runar Filper (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1369 — Svenskt fiske och vattenbruk av Martin Kinnunen m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1395 — Jordbruk - ökad konkurrenskraft utan förlust av biologisk mångfald av Martin Kinnunen m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1676 — Bevarande av ålfisket som ett kulturarv av Ludvig Ceimertz m.fl. (M)
- Motion 2024/25:1778 — Förbud mot storskaligt fiske och bottentrålning av Carl Nordblom (M)
- Motion 2024/25:1828 — Fiske som en del av besöksnäringen av Jennie Wernäng och Marléne Lund Kopparklint (båda M)
- Motion 2024/25:1928 — Hållbart och rättvist fiske av Andrea Andersson Tay m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2024/25:2038 — Det industriella trålfisket i Östersjön av Kjell Jansson m.fl. (M)
- Motion 2024/25:2050 — Levande fiske i Skåne av Ann-Charlotte Hammar Johnsson m.fl. (M)
- Motion 2024/25:2061 — Kvotfiske av blåfenad tonfisk i Bohuslän av Ann-Sofie Alm (M)
- Motion 2024/25:2320 — Hållbart fiske för konsumtion av Sanne Lennström m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2024/25:2364 — Rädda strömmingen i Östersjön av Jesper Skalberg Karlsson m.fl. (M)
- Motion 2024/25:2486 — Vatten, hav och fiske av Stina Larsson m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2024/25:2803 — Bottennära fiske av Sten Bergheden (M)
- Motion 2024/25:2954 — En folkrörelse för klimatet av Muharrem Demirok m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2024/25:2978 — Satsningar på Stockholms skärgård av Markus Wiechel m.fl. (SD)
Source: The Swedish Parliament