2025-05-072024/25:KU16 · p.28KUConstitution
The monetary unit
Constitutional protection for Sweden's currency against joining the EU currency union
What's at stake: Constitutional protection for the currency would mean that switching to the euro requires a heavier decision-making process than today, unlike the current arrangement where a simple parliamentary majority is enough. The question therefore concerns how easy or difficult it should be for Sweden to join the currency union in the future.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the government should prepare an amendment to the Instrument of Government regulating Sweden's currency, so that Swedish entry into the EU's currency union can no longer be decided by a simple majority in parliament, or whether the committee should reject such an initiative.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee rejects the motion calling for constitutional regulation of the currency. The full reasoning for this point is missing from the available material.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 25 (SD)
The reservation (SD) calls for the government to prepare an amendment to the Instrument of Government regulating the currency, to prevent a simple parliamentary majority from being able to decide that Sweden joins the currency union. The reasoning is that such an important question should not be decided by a simple majority without stronger constitutional protection.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 25 by SD.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Yes 21/0/0/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: high | not addressed |
| S | Yes | Yes 93/0/0/13 | follows the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| MP | No | Yes 16/0/0/2 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| C | Yes | Yes 21/0/0/3 | follows the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| L | Yes | Yes 14/0/0/2 | follows the plan | confidence: high | explicit |
| KD | No | Yes 17/0/0/2 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| M | Yes | Yes 60/0/0/8 | follows the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| SD | No | No 0/63/0/9 | follows the plan | confidence: high | explicit |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects motion 2024/25:1375 by Matheus Enholm et al. (SD) motion 7.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motion 2024/25:1375 av Matheus Enholm m.fl. (SD) yrkande 7.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag rejected approximately 90 proposals in motions on constitutional matters. The motions were submitted during the ordinary motion period 2024 and concern, among other things, the form of government and the head of state's mandate, increased transparency in the Royal Household and Palace Estate's finances, and EU cooperation. Some proposals concern measures to revitalize democracy. Other motions raise questions about political communication, party financing, lobbyists and cooling-off rules for ministers and senior civil servants. Further topics addressed in the motion proposals concern constitutional regulation regarding national minorities, Swedish citizenship and public service. The Riksdag refers to previous positions on these matters.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants the Government Act to be amended to clarify that a new monarch shall be chosen if Sweden lacks an heir to the throne. (SD) — Reservation 25
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan establishes that Sweden must continue to stand free from the EMU currency union and is principally critical of EU structures that lie outside citizens' control.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that Sweden must continue to stand free from the EMU currency union and is principally critical of EU structures that lie outside citizens' control. Constitutionally regulating the unit of currency so that a simple Riksdag majority cannot bring Sweden into a currency union secures precisely that stance. The plan also sees the constitution as democracy's safeguard and builds international cooperation on national self-determination.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att Sverige fortsatt måste stå fritt från valutaunionen EMU och är principiellt kritisk till EU-strukturer som ligger utanför medborgarnas kontroll. Att grundlagsreglera penningenheten så att en enkel riksdagsmajoritet inte kan föra in Sverige i en valutaunion säkrar just den ståndpunkten. Planen ser också grundlagarna som demokratins värn och bygger internationellt samarbete på nationellt självbestämmande.
- Sweden outside EMUdecisive»måste Sverige fortsatt stå fritt från valutaunionen EMU.« (party programme ↗)“Sweden must continue to stand free from the EMU currency union.”
- criticism of the EU's undemocratic structure»Vi är däremot kritiska till EU:s odemokratiska struktur« (party programme ↗)“We are, however, critical of the EU's undemocratic structure”
- the constitution as democracy's safeguard»Grundlagarna ska värna demokratin och människors fri- och« (party programme ↗)“The constitution shall protect democracy and people's freedom and”
- national self-determination»nationella självbestämmanderätten som grund.« (party programme ↗)“national self-determination as the foundation.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The documents say nothing about constitutionally regulating the monetary unit.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The documents say nothing about constitutionally regulating the monetary unit. The closest principle is the party programme's requirement that political power shall increase in relation to the law and that representative democracy is the most effective decision-making system, and that each power shift is determined by the member states themselves. On this basis the plan speaks weakly against locking the question in the constitution.
Original (Swedish)
Dokumenten säger ingenting om att grundlagsreglera penningenheten. Närmast liggande princip är partiprogrammets krav att politikens makt ska öka i förhållande till juridiken och att den representativa demokratin är det mest effektiva beslutssystemet, samt att varje maktförskjutning bestäms av medlemsstaterna själva. Utifrån den talar planen svagt emot att låsa frågan i grundlag.
- politics over lawdecisive»öka både i förhållande till den ekonomiska makten och i förhållande till juridiken.« (party programme ↗)“increase both in relation to economic power and in relation to the law.”
- representative democracy»Den representativa demokratin är det mest effektiva demokratiska beslutssystemet. Men« (party programme ↗)“Representative democracy is the most effective democratic decision-making system. But”
- member states decide»Det är emellertid viktigt att varje sådan maktförskjutning bestäms av« (party programme ↗)“It is, however, important that each such power shift is determined by”
The plan asserts that Sweden shall remain outside EMU and not introduce the euro, and describes the common currency as an ill-conceived prestige project.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan asserts that Sweden shall remain outside EMU and not introduce the euro, and describes the common currency as an ill-conceived prestige project. It also wants to protect the Constitution from rapid changes and that referendums are held on important matters. That the currency unit be constitutionally regulated so that a simple majority cannot decide on membership in a monetary union thus aligns with the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att Sverige ska stå fritt från EMU och inte införa euron, och beskriver den gemensamma valutan som ett ogenomtänkt prestigeprojekt. Den vill dessutom skydda grundlagen mot snabba förändringar och att folkomröstningar hålls i viktiga frågor. Att grundlagsreglera penningenheten så att en enkel majoritet inte kan besluta om medlemskap i en valutaunion ligger därför i linje med planen.
- Sweden outside EMUdecisive»EMU och inte införa euron.« (party programme ↗)“EMU and not introduce the euro.”
- Constitution against rapid decisions»skydda Sveriges grundlag mot snabba förändringar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“protect Sweden's Constitution from rapid changes.”
- criticism of the monetary union»det ogenomtänkta prestigeprojektet med en« (party programme ↗)“the ill-conceived prestige project with a”
- referendums on important matters»Om en viss andel medborgare efterfrågar det ska folkomröstningar hållas i viktiga« (party programme ↗)“If a certain proportion of citizens request it, referendums shall be held on important”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The documents say nothing about the monetary unit or currency union.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The documents say nothing about the monetary unit or currency union. The closest applicable principle is the party's fundamental view of the EU as a peace project that should be reformed and deepened where cooperation is needed, which argues against locking in an obstacle to continued integration in the basic law. The party's desire to make the basic law harder to change concerns the protection of democratic institutions, not the currency issue.
Original (Swedish)
Dokumenten säger ingenting om penningenheten eller om valutaunionen. Den närmast liggande principen är partiets grundsyn på EU som ett fredsprojekt som bör reformeras och fördjupas där samarbete behövs, vilket talar emot att i grundlag låsa fast ett hinder mot fortsatt integration. Att partiet vill göra grundlagen svårare att ändra rör skyddet av demokratiska institutioner, inte valutafrågan.
- the value of EU cooperationdecisive»EU har bidragit till att krigens Europa blivit ett fredens och stabilitetens Europa.« (party programme ↗)“The EU has contributed to making Europe's wars become an Europe of peace and stability.”
- reform, not lock in, EU cooperation»Men i en tid av allvarliga utmaningar finns ett tydligt behov av att reformera EU.« (party programme ↗)“But in a time of serious challenges there is a clear need to reform the EU.”
- the basic law protects institutions»Vi vill göra det svårare att ändra grundlagen, skydda oppositionens ställning i riksdagen och stärka domstolarnas oberoende.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to make it harder to change the basic law, protect the opposition's position in the Riksdag and strengthen the independence of the courts.”
The party programme explicitly establishes that Sweden shall introduce the euro as currency and that it is in Sweden's interest for the monetary union to be deepened.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme explicitly establishes that Sweden shall introduce the euro as currency and that it is in Sweden's interest for the monetary union to be deepened. The counter-proposal wants to constitutionally regulate the monetary unit precisely to make entry into a currency union harder, which directly counteracts this commitment. The plan's line is moreover that Sweden shall participate fully in European cooperation and be part of the EU's core.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet slår uttryckligen fast att Sverige ska införa euron som valuta och att det ligger i Sveriges intresse att den monetära unionen fördjupas. Motförslaget vill grundlagsreglera penningenheten just för att försvåra ett inträde i en valutaunion, vilket direkt motverkar detta åtagande. Planens linje är dessutom att Sverige ska delta fullt ut i Europasamarbetet och vara en del av EU:s kärna.
- introduce the eurodecisive»Sverige ska införa euron som valuta.« (party programme ↗)“Sweden shall introduce the euro as currency.”
- euro deepens integration»Genom en gemensam valuta fördjupas den integration som ytterst syftar till att omöjliggöra konflikter mellan Europas länder.« (party programme ↗)“Through a common currency, the integration is deepened which ultimately aims to make conflicts between Europe's nations impossible.”
- full participation in EU»Som liberaler vill vi att Sverige ska delta fullt ut i Europasamarbetet och sträva efter att vara en del av EU:s kärna.« (party programme ↗)“As liberals, we want Sweden to participate fully in European cooperation and strive to be part of the EU's core.”
- stable monetary union»Det ligger i Sveriges intresse att den monetära unionen stabiliseras genom gemensamma regelverk och fördjupat ekonomiskt samarbete.« (party programme ↗)“It is in Sweden's interest for the monetary union to be stabilized through common rules and deeper economic cooperation.”
The plan establishes that a common currency requires increased supranationality and that all member states shall approve transfer of expanded decision-making power to the EU, and that treaty amendments shall be decided with unanimity.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that a common currency requires increased supranationality and that all member states shall approve transfer of expanded decision-making power to the EU, and that treaty amendments shall be decided with unanimity. Stronger protection in the Constitution for the currency unit responds to this high threshold for transfer of power, and the plan wants referenda to be usable in such matters. The Constitution's role as a solid foundation for all public decisions also supports regulation.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att en gemensam valuta förutsätter ökad överstatlighet och att alla medlemsstater ska godkänna överföring av utökad beslutsrätt till EU, samt att fördragsändringar ska beslutas med enhällighet. Ett starkare skydd i regeringsformen för penningenheten svarar mot denna höga tröskel för överlåtelse av makt, och planen vill att folkomröstningar ska kunna användas i sådana frågor. Grundlagens roll som fast grund för alla offentliga beslut stödjer också en reglering.
- high threshold for transfer of powerdecisive»godkänna överföring av utökad beslutsrätt till EU.« (party programme ↗)“approve transfer of expanded decision-making power to the EU.”
- unanimity in treaty amendments»i fördragen ska beslutas med enhällighet.« (party programme ↗)“in the treaties shall be decided with unanimity.”
- referendum in major issues»Folkomröstningar ska kunna användas både på nationell och lokal nivå.« (party programme ↗)“Referenda shall be usable both at national and local level.”
- the Constitution as solid foundation»Grundlagen ska vara den fasta grunden för alla« (party programme ↗)“The Constitution shall be the solid foundation for all”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan calls the Moderate Party the Europe Party in Swedish politics and makes EU cooperation the core of Sweden's economic and political engagement.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan calls the Moderate Party the Europe Party in Swedish politics and makes EU cooperation the core of Sweden's economic and political engagement. A constitutional barrier on the monetary unit would lock Sweden outside of deepened economic integration and thereby go against that line. The plan's view of the constitution is moreover that it should provide a clear catalogue of rights and freedoms, not regulate currency policy.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kallar Moderaterna Europapartiet i svensk politik och gör EU-samarbetet till kärnan i Sveriges ekonomiska och politiska engagemang. Att grundlagsspärra penningenheten skulle låsa fast Sverige utanför en fördjupad ekonomisk integration och därmed gå emot den linjen. Planens syn på grundlagen är dessutom att den ska ge en tydlig katalog av fri- och rättigheter, inte reglera valutapolitiken.
- the Europe Partydecisive»Moderaterna är Europapartiet i svensk politik, och vi är redo att axla uppgiften att leda det svenska EU-ordförandeskapet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Moderate Party is the Europe Party in Swedish politics, and we are ready to take on the task of leading the Swedish EU presidency.”
- EU as the core»EU-samarbetet är kärnan i Sveriges ekonomiska och politiska internationella engagemang« (party programme ↗)“EU cooperation is the core of Sweden's economic and political international engagement”
- the constitution protects rights and freedoms»Vår svenska grundlag ska ha en tydlig katalog av fri- och rättigheter.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Our Swedish constitution should have a clear catalogue of rights and freedoms.”
- deepened internal market»Fördjupa den inre marknaden, inte minst för tjänster och digitala produkter« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Deepen the internal market, not least for services and digital products”
The plan explicitly requires that the crown's position is secured through a Swedish exemption from participation in the EU's currency union and sees major advantages in preserving an independent national currency.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan explicitly requires that the crown's position is secured through a Swedish exemption from participation in the EU's currency union and sees major advantages in preserving an independent national currency. A constitutional protection preventing a simple majority from taking Sweden into a currency union is precisely the protection the plan seeks. The plan also generally wants to stop transfers of power to the EU.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver uttryckligen att kronans ställning säkras genom ett svenskt undantag från deltagande i EU:s valutaunion och ser stora fördelar med att bevara en självständig nationell valuta. Ett grundlagsskydd som hindrar att en enkel majoritet för in Sverige i en valutaunion är precis det skydd planen efterfrågar. Planen vill dessutom generellt stoppa maktöverföringar till EU.
- crown secured against currency uniondecisive»Säkra kronans ställning genom ett svenskt undantag från deltagande i EU:s valutaunion« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Secure the crown's position through a Swedish exemption from participation in the EU's currency union”
- legal exemption required»Även kronans ställning måste säkras genom ett svenskt juridiskt undantag från deltagande i valutasamarbetet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The crown's position must also be secured through a Swedish legal exemption from participation in currency cooperation.”
- own national currency»Sverigedemokraterna ser stora ekonomiska och politiska fördelar med att bevara vårt lands självständiga, nationella valuta.« (party programme ↗)“Sweden Democrats see major economic and political advantages in maintaining our country's independent, national currency.”
- stop transfers of power to the EU»Stoppa maktöverföringar och EU-skatter« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Stop transfers of power and EU taxes”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2024/25:KU16)
- Committee report full text (HC01KU16)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2023/24:474 — Grundlag av Matheus Enholm m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:105 — Om krav på enbart svenskt medborgarskap för statsråd och riksdagsledamöter av Rashid Farivar (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1193 — Avskaffande av anonyma partibidrag av Niels Paarup-Petersen (C)
- Motion 2024/25:1295 — Skydda även svensk kultur i regeringsformen av Staffan Eklöf (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1345 — Det svenska språkets bevarande av Runar Filper m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1374 — Granskning av Matheus Enholm m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1375 — Grundlag av Matheus Enholm m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1376 — Konservativ politik för samtid och framtid av Matheus Enholm m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1377 — Några valfrågor av Matheus Enholm m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1380 — En behövlig myndighetsöversyn av Matheus Enholm m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1481 — En riksrevision för kommunerna av Malin Danielsson och Cecilia Rönn (båda L)
- Motion 2024/25:150 — Ökad transparens i partifinansieringen av Ola Möller (S)
- Motion 2024/25:1774 — Stärkt kulturpolitik - stärkt demokrati av Mats Berglund m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2024/25:1784 — Ett modernt statsskick av Niels Paarup-Petersen m.fl. (C, S, L, MP, V)
- Motion 2024/25:1922 — En funktionsrättspolitik för trygghet och delaktighet av Nadja Awad m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2024/25:1934 — Konstitutionella frågor av Jessica Wetterling m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2024/25:1935 — Åtgärder för de nationella minoriteterna och minoritetsspråken av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2024/25:1984 — Värnande av demokratin av Ann-Sofie Alm (M)
- Motion 2024/25:222 — Införande av sanktioner för överträdelse i lagen om restriktioner vid statsråds och statssekreterares övergång till annan än statlig verksamhet av Josef Fransson (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:223 — Nationellt organiserad kommun- och regionrevision av Josef Fransson (SD)
Source: The Swedish Parliament