2023-04-192022/23:JuU13 · p.19JuUJustice
Ownership forms for the Prison and Probation Service's facilities
Ownership models for prison and remand facilities
What's at stake: The prison and probation service leases most of its facilities from the state-owned company Specialfastigheter AB under long-term contracts, which proponents say limits the agency's ability to quickly adapt its operations to, for example, changing capacity needs. The issue concerns the agency's long-term flexibility to expand and adapt its facilities.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question was whether ownership of the prison and probation service's facilities should be reviewed so the agency itself could own and control its buildings, or whether the current arrangement of leasing them should remain.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The Committee rejects the motion and sees no reason to change the current arrangement for the prison and probation service's facilities, referring in this context to the ongoing work to increase the number of places within the existing structure.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 15 (SD)
The Sweden Democrats argue that the long-term leases with Specialfastigheter AB limit the prison and probation service's ability to adapt its operations, and believe that — as in several other countries — it should be examined whether the agency should itself own and control its facilities.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 15 by SD.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Yes 21/0/0/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| S | No | Yes 93/0/0/14 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| MP | No | Yes 16/0/0/2 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| C | No | Yes 21/0/0/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| L | Yes | Yes 14/0/0/2 | follows the plan | confidence: low | derived |
| KD | No | Yes 17/0/0/2 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | derived |
| M | Yes | Yes 59/0/0/9 | follows the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| SD | No | No 1/63/0/9 | follows the plan | confidence: low | derived |
Broke with the party line
| SDAlexander Christiansson (SD, Västra Götalands läns västra) | Yes — party line: No |
MPs whose vote differs from their party's majority position in this division. Marked with a dark ring in the chamber view.
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects motion 2022/23:955 by Richard Jomshof et al. (SD) demand 1.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motion 2022/23:955 av Richard Jomshof m.fl. (SD) yrkande 1.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag rejected approximately 40 proposals in motions from the general motion period of 2022. Partly by referring to ongoing investigations. The proposals concern, for example, recidivism prevention work, the Prison and Probation Service's capacity, and conditional release.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to expand drug dog operations within the correctional service to increase narcotics control. (SD) — Reservation 15
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan demands that public essential services and infrastructure that have been privatized be taken back into public ownership, and the party programme establishes that public ownership shall be strong in key sectors such as infrastructure and housing production.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan demands that public essential services and infrastructure that have been privatized be taken back into public ownership, and the party programme establishes that public ownership shall be strong in key sectors such as infrastructure and housing production. That a public agency owns its own premises rather than being bound by long rental contracts with an external property owner aligns with this. The plan does not mention the Correctional Service's premises, so the position is derived from the ownership principle.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att samhällsviktig verksamhet och infrastruktur som privatiserats tas tillbaka i gemensam ägo, och partiprogrammet slår fast att samhällsägandet ska vara starkt i nyckelsektorer som infrastruktur och bostadsproduktion. Att en myndighet själv äger sina lokaler i stället för att vara bunden av långa hyreskontrakt med en extern fastighetsägare ligger i linje med detta. Planen nämner inte Kriminalvårdens lokaler, så ställningstagandet är härlett ur ägandeprincipen.
- reclaim privatized infrastructuredecisive»Det är hög tid att agera och ta tillbaka den samhällsviktiga verksamhet och infrastruktur som har privatiserats.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It is high time to act and take back the public essential services and infrastructure that have been privatized.”
- strong public ownership in key sectors»är att samhällsägandet är starkt inom ekonomins nyckelsektorer:« (party programme ↗)“is that public ownership is strong within the economy's key sectors:”
- increase collective ownership»De gemensamt ägda företagens andel av ekonomin« (party programme ↗)“The share of collectively-owned companies in the economy”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan says nothing about ownership forms for the Prison and Probation Service's premises.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan says nothing about ownership forms for the Prison and Probation Service's premises. The closest principle is that democracy has priority over the market and that socially important facilities shall not be handed over to private ownership interests. Investigating state ownership instead of long rental contracts with external property owners is in line with that principle, but the position is entirely derived.
Original (Swedish)
Planen säger ingenting om ägandeformer för Kriminalvårdens lokaler. Närmast liggande princip är att demokratin har företräde före marknaden och att samhällsviktiga anläggningar inte ska överlåtas till privata ägarintressen. Att utreda ett statligt ägande i stället för långa hyreskontrakt med extern fastighetsägare ligger i linje med den principen, men ställningstagandet är helt härlett.
- democracy's prioritydecisive»Demokratin har därför företräde före marknaden.« (party programme ↗)“Democracy therefore has priority over the market.”
- no sell-off of socially important facilities»Inga akutsjukhus ska säljas ut.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“No acute hospitals shall be sold off.”
- limits to market logic»Vissa områden kommer dock aldrig att lämpa sig för marknadslogiken.« (party programme ↗)“Certain areas will, however, never be suitable for market logic.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan says nothing about ownership forms for authority premises.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan says nothing about ownership forms for authority premises. The closest guiding principle is that in certain cases there may be reasons for the state to own and operate activities, combined with the goal of humane criminal care that can adapt activities according to need. Based on this, there is no obstacle to investigating own ownership, but the basis is weak.
Original (Swedish)
Planen säger inget om ägandeformer för myndigheters lokaler. Närmast liggande princip är att det i vissa fall kan finnas skäl för staten att äga och driva verksamhet, kombinerat med målet om en human kriminalvård som kan anpassa verksamheten efter behov. Utifrån detta finns inget hinder mot att utreda ett eget ägande, men underlaget är svagt.
- public ownership can be justifieddecisive»eller en kommun att äga och driva affärsverksamheter.« (party programme ↗)“or a municipality to own and operate commercial activities.”
- humane criminal care»human och ha som mål att den som dömts inte ska« (party programme ↗)“humane and aim that the convicted shall not”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan says nothing about ownership structures for government agencies' premises.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan says nothing about ownership structures for government agencies' premises. The closest applicable principle is that private ownership gives self-determination and long-term thinking, and that tax funds should be used sparingly and the state perform its tasks as efficiently as possible. Based on this, the plan argues for trying an arrangement where the Prison and Probation Service owns its own premises.
Original (Swedish)
Planen säger ingenting om ägandeformer för statliga myndigheters lokaler. Närmast liggande princip är att eget ägande ger självbestämmande och långsiktighet, och att skattemedel ska användas sparsamt och staten sköta sina uppgifter så effektivt som möjligt. Utifrån detta talar planen för att pröva en ordning där Kriminalvården själv äger sina lokaler.
- ownership gives long-term thinkingdecisive»Det ger dem större självbestämmande och utrymme att tänka långsiktigt.« (party programme ↗)“It gives them greater self-determination and room to think long-term.”
- economical with tax funds»Politiken ska hushålla med skattebetalarnas pengar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Policy shall be economical with taxpayers' money.”
- efficient state administration»Centerpartiets uppgift är att se till att staten gör det den är till för, så effektivt och rättssäkert som möjligt« (party programme ↗)“The Centre Party's task is to ensure that the state does what it is meant to do, as efficiently and with as much legal certainty as possible”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan says nothing about ownership forms for the Correctional Service's premises.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan says nothing about ownership forms for the Correctional Service's premises. The closest principle is that the public should only operate commercial activities with a strong social interest and should not crowd out functioning private alternatives, which speaks against the state owning its facilities outright. The plan's demands in the area concern more prisons and jails, not who owns the properties.
Original (Swedish)
Planen säger inget om ägandeformer för Kriminalvårdens lokaler. Närmast liggande princip är att det offentliga bara ska driva affärsverksamhet vid ett starkt samhällsintresse och inte tränga ut fungerande privata alternativ, vilket talar mot att staten ska äga sina lokaler i egen regi. Planens krav på området handlar om fler häkten och fängelser, inte om vem som äger fastigheterna.
- limited public ownershipdecisive»Det offentliga ska endast driva affärsverksamhet om det finns ett starkt samhällsintresse.« (party programme ↗)“The public should only operate commercial activities if there is a strong social interest.”
- not crowd out private alternatives»driva verksamheter som tränger ut fungerande privata alternativ« (party programme ↗)“operate activities that crowd out functioning private alternatives”
- more places, not new ownership form»fler häkten och fängelser med fler kriminalvårdare« (2022 manifesto ↗)“more prisons and jails with more correctional officers”
The plan says nothing about in what form the state shall dispose of criminal justice's facilities.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan says nothing about in what form the state shall dispose of criminal justice's facilities. The closest principle is the requirement for significantly expanded criminal justice together with the fact that monitoring and cost control are important political tasks; an investigation of the ownership form serves the adaptability that an expansion requires. The position is therefore derived from general commitments, not from an explicit position.
Original (Swedish)
Planen säger ingenting om i vilken form staten ska förfoga över kriminalvårdens lokaler. Närmast liggande princip är kravet på en kraftigt utbyggd kriminalvård tillsammans med att uppföljning och kostnadskontroll är viktiga politiska uppgifter; en utredning av ägandeformen tjänar den anpassningsförmåga som en utbyggnad kräver. Ställningstagandet är därför härlett ur allmänna åtaganden, inte ur ett uttalat ställningstagande.
- expanded criminal justicedecisive»en kraftigt utbyggd kriminalvård« (2022 manifesto ↗)“significantly expanded criminal justice”
- monitoring and cost control»Utvärdering, kostnadsuppföljning och kvalitetskontroll är därför viktiga politiska« (party programme ↗)“Evaluation, cost monitoring and quality control are therefore important political”
- the value of property rights»Rätten till egendom är en mänsklig rättighet« (party programme ↗)“The right to property is a human right”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan says nothing about how the Prison and Probation Service's premises shall be owned.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan says nothing about how the Prison and Probation Service's premises shall be owned. The closest principle is that the public shall not perform what someone else can do equally well, and the plan chooses the rental route itself when it wants to rent prison places abroad to quickly increase capacity. An arrangement where the agency itself owns its premises thereby falls outside the plan's approach.
Original (Swedish)
Planen säger inget om hur Kriminalvårdens lokaler ska ägas. Närmast liggande princip är att det offentliga inte ska utföra det som någon annan kan göra lika bra, och planen väljer själv hyresvägen när den vill hyra fängelseplatser utomlands för att snabbt öka kapaciteten. En ordning där myndigheten själv äger sina lokaler ligger därmed utanför planens linje.
- the public does not do everything itselfdecisive»Om något kan göras lika bra eller bättre av« (party programme ↗)“If something can be done as well or better by”
- more places, including rented»Öka antalet fängelseplatser och se över möjligheten att hyra fängelseplatser utomlands« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Increase the number of prison places and examine the possibility of renting prison places abroad”
- limited state ambition»En stat som sträcker ut långtgående ambitioner över alla« (party programme ↗)“A state that stretches far-reaching ambitions over everything”
The plan requires expanded access to prison places and a greatly upgraded justice system, which presupposes that the Prison and Probation Service can adapt its premises to need.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires expanded access to prison places and a greatly upgraded justice system, which presupposes that the Prison and Probation Service can adapt its premises to need. The party programme counts the justice system among the central public functions that should be under state control and takes a pragmatic approach to ownership and operational forms. Investigating own ownership form for premises thus aligns with the plan, even though the plan does not address the ownership question directly. The Committee's reasoning regarding capacity work concerns the plan substantively.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver utökad tillgång på anstaltsplatser och ett kraftigt upprustat rättsväsende, vilket förutsätter att Kriminalvården kan anpassa sina lokaler efter behovet. Principprogrammet räknar rättsväsendet till de centrala samhällsfunktioner som bör stå under statlig kontroll och intar i övrigt ett pragmatiskt förhållningssätt till ägande- och driftsformer. Att utreda egen ägandeform för lokalerna ligger därmed i linje med planen, även om planen inte behandlar ägandefrågan direkt. Utskottets skäl om kapacitetsarbetet berör planen i sak.
- more prison placesdecisive»Utöka tillgången på anstaltsplatser i och utanför Sverige« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Expand access to prison places in and outside Sweden”
- justice system under state control»centrala samhällsfunktioner såsom rättsväsende, försvar och väsentliga delar av vår infrastruktur« (party programme ↗)“central public functions such as the justice system, defence and essential parts of our infrastructure”
- pragmatic view on operational form»pragmatiskt och resultatinriktat förhållningssätt« (party programme ↗)“pragmatic and results-oriented approach”
- upgraded justice system»Säkerställa satsningar för ett kraftigt upprustat rättsväsende« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Ensure investments for a greatly upgraded justice system”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2022/23:JuU13)
- Committee report full text (HA01JuU13)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2022/23:1108 — Kriminalvården av Magnus Jacobsson (KD)
- Motion 2022/23:1217 — Åtgärder med syfte att stoppa våldskulturen av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2022/23:1437 — Återfallsförebyggande arbete av Monica Haider och Tomas Eneroth (båda S)
- Motion 2022/23:1673 — Jämställdhet för hållbar utveckling av Annie Lööf m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2022/23:2139 — Utgiftsområde 4 Rättsväsendet av Ardalan Shekarabi m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2022/23:553 — Rymningar, samhällstjänst för dömda och betalning av skulder av Markus Wiechel m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2022/23:588 — Effekten av farmakologisk behandling för personer som begått sexualbrott av Marléne Lund Kopparklint (M)
- Motion 2022/23:600 — Behandlingsmetoder för dömda pedofiler av Marléne Lund Kopparklint (M)
- Motion 2022/23:77 — Avtjäna fängelsestraff i hemland av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2022/23:779 — Kriminalvårdsanstalt i Åmål av Johan Hultberg och Ann-Sofie Alm (båda M)
- Motion 2022/23:863 — Rättspolitik av Ulrika Liljeberg m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2022/23:883 — Våld i nära relation - ett samhällsproblem av Ulrika Liljeberg m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2022/23:955 — Kriminalvårdsfrågor av Richard Jomshof m.fl. (SD)
Source: The Swedish Parliament