2026-02-252025/26:TU9 · p.1TUTransport & infrastructure
A fossil-free vehicle fleet
The pace of the transition to a fossil-free vehicle fleet
What's at stake: The transport sector accounts for a large share of Sweden's emissions, and the pace of the transition affects whether Sweden's climate targets for 2030 and 2045 are met, as well as how quickly households and businesses face new requirements and support around electric vehicles and biofuels.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the government's already-decided measures to transition the vehicle fleet to fossil-free operation are sufficient, or whether the government should introduce additional policy instruments to ensure the transport sector's emissions-reduction targets are met.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee notes that the government has already taken and announced measures to speed up the transition to a fossil-free vehicle fleet, including support for market introduction of electric trucks and buses, a new EV subsidy and a tax exemption for workplace charging, as well as an inquiry into further policy instruments, and therefore rejects the motions.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 2 (C)
The reservation holds that Swedish climate policy is not on track to meet either Swedish or European climate targets and wants the government to introduce new policy instruments — including for climate-efficient biofuels, electrification and more efficient transport solutions, plus an energy-labelling scheme for new cars and better options to convert cars to greener drivetrains — to secure the transport sector's 2030 emissions-reduction target.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 2 by C.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have held
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: SSocialdemokraterna
Ja 245–21Ja 153–114
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Abstain 0/0/18/4 | differs | confidence: high | explicit |
| S | No | Yes 92/0/1/13 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| MP | No | Abstain 0/0/16/2 | differs | confidence: high | explicit |
| C | No | No 0/21/0/3 | match | confidence: high | explicit |
| L | No | Yes 13/0/0/3 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| KD | Yes | Yes 17/0/0/2 | match | confidence: medium | explicit |
| M | Yes | Yes 60/0/0/8 | match | confidence: low | not addressed |
| SD | Yes | Yes 62/0/0/9 | match | confidence: high | derived |
Broke with the party line
| SJoakim Sandell (S, Malmö kommun) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
MPs whose vote differs from their party's majority position in this division. Marked with a dark ring in the chamber view.
Committee proposal
Parliament rejects the motions 2025/26:1797 by Magnus Jacobsson et al. (KD), 2025/26:2780 by Nooshi Dadgostar et al. (V) demands 67 and 68, 2025/26:3278 by Linus Lakso et al. (MP) demands 10 and 13, 2025/26:3422 by Katarina Luhr et al. (MP) demands 122 and 123, 2025/26:3428 by Emma Nohrén et al. (MP) demand 43, 2025/26:3582 by Rickard Nordin et al. (C) demand 59 in this respect, 2025/26:3668 by Kjell-Arne Ottosson (KD), and 2025/26:3728 by Ulrika Heie et al. (C) demand 85 in this respect.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2025/26:1797 av Magnus Jacobsson m.fl. (KD), 2025/26:2780 av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V) yrkandena 67 och 68, 2025/26:3278 av Linus Lakso m.fl. (MP) yrkandena 10 och 13, 2025/26:3422 av Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP) yrkandena 122 och 123, 2025/26:3428 av Emma Nohrén m.fl. (MP) yrkande 43, 2025/26:3582 av Rickard Nordin m.fl. (C) yrkande 59 i denna del, 2025/26:3668 av Kjell-Arne Ottosson (KD) och 2025/26:3728 av Ulrika Heie m.fl. (C) yrkande 85 i denna del.
Riksdag decision: Parliament rejected approximately 120 proposals on road traffic and vehicle matters from the general motion period 2025. The proposals concern, among other things, efforts towards a fossil-free vehicle fleet, access to fossil-free refuelling, charging infrastructure for electric vehicles, and organization of road maintenance and winter road maintenance. Parliament refers, among other things, to planned or already taken measures and ongoing work.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants the government to introduce regulatory instruments to reduce transport emissions and ensure a fossil-independent vehicle fleet. (C) — Reservation 2
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan requires that the road network is both electrified and complemented with infrastructure for other sustainable fuels and that the transition takes place immediately with stricter climate goals as guidance.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that the road network is both electrified and complemented with infrastructure for other sustainable fuels and that the transition takes place immediately with stricter climate goals as guidance. The counter-proposal's new steering instruments for biofuels, electrification and more efficient transport solutions as well as better opportunities to convert cars respond directly to that. The plan also sees a coordinated strategy for electrification of transport as necessary.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att vägnätet både elektrifieras och kompletteras med infrastruktur för andra hållbara drivmedel och att omställningen sker omgående med skärpta klimatmål som styrning. Motförslagets nya styrmedel för biodrivmedel, elektrifiering och effektivare transportlösningar samt bättre möjligheter att konvertera bilar svarar direkt mot det. Planen ser också en sammanhållen strategi för elektrifiering av transporterna som nödvändig.
- electrification and sustainable fuelsdecisive»För att göra såväl person- som godstransporter hållbara behöver vägnätet både elektrifieras och kompletteras med infrastruktur för andra hållbara drivmedel.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“To make both passenger and freight transport sustainable, the road network needs to be both electrified and complemented with infrastructure for other sustainable fuels.”
- immediate transition»Omställningen behöver ske omgående och alla politiska beslut behöver ta hänsyn till den akuta kris som vi befinner oss i.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The transition needs to take place immediately and all political decisions need to take into account the acute crisis we are in.”
- stricter climate control»Investeringar i grön teknik, industri och infrastruktur, utbyggd energikapacitet och stärkt styrning utifrån nya, skärpta klimatmål behövs.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Investments in green technology, industry and infrastructure, expanded energy capacity and strengthened control based on new, stricter climate goals are needed.”
- coordinated electrification strategy»en sammanhållen strategi för elektrifiering av transporterna, där stadsplanering, kollektivtrafik och elfordon alla har viktiga roller att spela.« (party programme ↗)“a coordinated strategy for electrification of transport, where urban planning, public transport and electric vehicles all have important roles to play.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The election manifesto establishes that the climate policy framework is in place and the pace of emission reductions must increase, and promises increased production of renewable fuels and more charging points.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto establishes that the climate policy framework is in place and the pace of emission reductions must increase, and promises increased production of renewable fuels and more charging points. The counter-proposal's requirement for new policy instruments for biofuels, electrification and more efficient transport to reach the transport sector's targets by 2030 is the same policy. The party programme's requirement for a swift transformation of transport confirms the support.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet slår fast att det klimatpolitiska ramverket ligger fast och att takten i utsläppsminskningen måste öka, samt lovar ökad produktion av förnybara drivmedel och fler laddstolpar. Motförslagets krav på nya styrmedel för biodrivmedel, elektrifiering och effektivare transporter för att nå transportsektorns mål till 2030 är samma politik. Partiprogrammets krav på en skyndsam omställning av transporterna bekräftar stödet.
- climate framework is in placedecisive»Det klimatpolitiska ramverket ska ligga fast.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The climate policy framework shall be in place.”
- renewable fuels»Vi vill öka den svenska produktionen av förnybara drivmedel, så att det blir lättare att tanka fossilfritt i Sverige.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to increase Swedish production of renewable fuels, so that it becomes easier to refuel fossil-free in Sweden.”
- transformation of transport»Skyndsam och rättvis klimatomställning för att göra produktion, transporter och« (party programme ↗)“Swift and fair climate transformation to make production, transport and”
- increased pace of emission reduction»Redan nu minskar utsläppen i vårt land, men takten måste öka.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Emissions are already declining in our country, but the pace must increase.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan requires that transport emissions decrease in order to meet climate goals and goes further than the counter-proposal by requiring that only fossil-free cars are sold from 2025.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that transport emissions decrease in order to meet climate goals and goes further than the counter-proposal by requiring that only fossil-free cars are sold from 2025. New policy instruments for biofuels, electrification and more efficient transport solutions are precisely the tools the plan points to, together with state responsibility for charging infrastructure throughout the country. The plan therefore does not see already-implemented measures as sufficient.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att trafikens utsläpp minskar för att klimatmålen ska nås och går längre än motförslaget genom att bara fossilfria bilar ska säljas från 2025. Nya styrmedel för biodrivmedel, elektrifiering och effektivare transportlösningar är precis de verktyg planen pekar ut, tillsammans med statligt ansvar för laddinfrastruktur i hela landet. Planen ser alltså inte redan vidtagna åtgärder som tillräckliga.
- fossil-free vehicle fleetdecisive»att den som behöver bil ska ha råd med ett klimatsmart alternativ, och att bara fossilfria bilar ska säljas från 2025.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“so that anyone who needs a car can afford a climate-smart alternative, and only fossil-free cars shall be sold from 2025.”
- transport sector emission targets»Trafikens utsläpp måste minska om vi ska ha en chans att klara klimatmålen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Transport emissions must decrease if we are to have a chance of meeting climate goals.”
- biofuels in the transition»Samtidigt kommer biodrivmedel att spela en viktig roll för att minska utsläppen.« (party programme ↗)“At the same time, biofuels will play an important role in reducing emissions.”
- electrification with state support»riktat stöd och en utbyggd laddinfrastruktur i hela landet« (party programme ↗)“targeted support and expanded charging infrastructure throughout the country”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The party programme establishes that oil dependency in the transport sector shall be broken and that the vehicle fleet ultimately shall be powered only by renewable energy, and the election manifesto that transport emissions must disappear.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme establishes that oil dependency in the transport sector shall be broken and that the vehicle fleet ultimately shall be powered only by renewable energy, and the election manifesto that transport emissions must disappear. The counter-proposal's requirement for new instruments for biofuel, electrification and more efficient transport are exactly the tools the plan points to, including maximally reduced tax on biofuel and promotion of electric cars. The plan explicitly prioritises effective measures over passivity.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet slår fast att oljeberoendet i transportsektorn ska brytas och att fordonsflottan på sikt endast ska drivas med förnybar energi, och valmanifestet att transporternas utsläpp ska bort. Motförslagets krav på nya styrmedel för biodrivmedel, elektrifiering och effektivare transporter är exakt de verktyg planen pekar ut, inklusive maximalt sänkt skatt på biodrivmedel och främjande av elbilar. Planen prioriterar uttryckligen effektiva åtgärder framför passivitet.
- fossil-free vehicle fleetdecisive»Att bryta oljeberoendet i transportsektorn och nå svenska klimatmål förutsätter att Sveriges fordonsflotta på sikt endast drivs med förnybar energi.« (party programme ↗)“To break oil dependency in the transport sector and reach Swedish climate goals requires that Sweden's vehicle fleet in the long run is only powered by renewable energy.”
- instruments for biofuel»Sänk skatten maximalt på biodrivmedel som blandas in i bensin och diesel. Det skulle sänka bilisternas kostnader, gynna klimatet, skapa jobb och minska Sveriges oljeberoende.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Lower tax the maximum on biofuels blended into petrol and diesel. This would lower motorists' costs, benefit the climate, create jobs and reduce Sweden's oil dependency.”
- promote electrification»Elbilarna ska främjas med hjälp av fler laddplatser, differentierade trängselskatter som gynnar miljöbilar och bättre parkeringsmöjligheter.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Electric cars shall be promoted with the help of more charging stations, differentiated congestion charges that favour environmental cars and better parking opportunities.”
- away with transport emissions»Transporternas utsläpp ska bort och ny utsläppsfri infrastruktur ska komma på plats.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Transport emissions must disappear and new emission-free infrastructure shall be put in place.”
The party programme commits that electrification of the transport sector shall be accelerated, and the election manifesto that fossil emissions from the transport sector shall go, that more shall choose the electric car and that the blending of fossil-free fuels shall continue.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme commits that electrification of the transport sector shall be accelerated, and the election manifesto that fossil emissions from the transport sector shall go, that more shall choose the electric car and that the blending of fossil-free fuels shall continue. The counter-proposal's demands for new policy instruments for electrification and climate-effective biofuels to secure the 2030 goal thus align with the plan's substance. However, the plan prefers general and technology-neutral instruments before targeted detailed measures, which lowers certainty.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet åtar sig att elektrifieringen av transportsektorn ska påskyndas, och valmanifestet att fossilutsläppen från transportsektorn ska bort, att fler ska välja elbilen och att inblandningen av fossilfria bränslen ska fortsätta. Motförslagets krav på nya styrmedel för elektrifiering och klimateffektiva biodrivmedel för att säkra 2030-målet ligger därmed i linje med planens sakinnehåll. Planen föredrar dock generella och teknikneutrala styrmedel framför riktade detaljåtgärder, vilket sänker säkerheten.
- accelerated electrificationdecisive»Elektrifieringen av transportsektorn ska påskyndas.« (party programme ↗)“Electrification of the transport sector shall be accelerated.”
- fossil-free transport sector»Fossilutsläppen från transportsektorn ska bort. Fler ska välja elbilen och en inblandning av fossilfria bränslen ska fortsätta.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Fossil emissions from the transport sector shall go. More shall choose the electric car and blending of fossil-free fuels shall continue.”
- technology-neutral policy instruments»Generella och teknikneutrala ekonomiska styrmedel, såsom koldioxidskatt och breda system för handel med utsläppsrätter, är det mest effektiva redskapet.« (party programme ↗)“General and technology-neutral economic instruments, such as carbon dioxide tax and broad systems for emissions trading, are the most effective tool.”
- expanded charging infrastructure»Det behövs laddstolpar där vi bor, arbetar och reser.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“There is a need for charging stations where we live, work and travel.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto, which carries the greatest weight, promises to lower petrol and diesel prices significantly mainly by reducing the proportion of expensive biofuel, which is the opposite of the counter-proposal's demand for new policy instruments for climate-effective biofuels.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto, which carries the greatest weight, promises to lower petrol and diesel prices significantly mainly by reducing the proportion of expensive biofuel, which is the opposite of the counter-proposal's demand for new policy instruments for climate-effective biofuels. Climate transition shall according to the plan happen in a way that both works and is efficient, and car dependence across the country is recognized. That the plan otherwise wishes to accelerate energy-efficient vehicles is not sufficient to bear the counter-proposal's demand.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet, som väger tyngst, lovar att sänka bensin- och dieselpriserna rejält främst genom minskad inblandning av dyrt biobränsle, vilket är motsatsen till motförslagets krav på nya styrmedel för klimateffektiva biodrivmedel. Klimatomställningen ska enligt planen ske på ett sätt som både fungerar och är effektivt, och bilberoendet i hela landet erkänns. Att planen i övrigt vill påskynda energieffektiva fordon räcker inte för att bära motförslagets krav.
- cheaper fuel, less biofueldecisive»Sänk bensin- och dieselpriserna rejält för alla, främst genom minskad inblandningen av dyrt biobränsle.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Lower petrol and diesel prices significantly for everyone, mainly by reducing the addition of expensive biofuel.”
- cost-effective climate transition»Sverige är världsledande i klimatomställningen och det ska vi fortsätta vara på ett sätt som både fungerar och är effektivt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden is world-leading in climate transition and we shall continue to be in a way that both works and is efficient.”
- car dependence across the country»Tillgång till bil är för många en förutsättning för att kunna leva och verka« (party programme ↗)“Access to a car is for many a prerequisite for being able to live and work”
- promote energy-efficient vehicles»understödja och påskynda utveckling, produktion och användning av energieffektiva fordon« (party programme ↗)“support and accelerate the development, production and use of energy-efficient vehicles”
The plan's transport policy line is to transition through electrification and biofuels while also lowering the price of petrol and diesel, and it states that emission reductions abroad are often cheaper than in Sweden.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's transport policy line is to transition through electrification and biofuels while also lowering the price of petrol and diesel, and it states that emission reductions abroad are often cheaper than in Sweden. New instruments and requirements such as energy declaration for new cars to secure a Swedish interim goal are precisely the expensive and symbolically oriented policy the plan warns against. Parts of the counter-proposal, such as support for biofuels, however align closely with the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planens transportpolitiska linje är att ställa om genom elektrifiering och biodrivmedel samtidigt som priset på bensin och diesel sänks, och den slår fast att utsläppsminskningar utomlands ofta är billigare än i Sverige. Nya styrmedel och krav som energideklaration för nya bilar för att säkra ett svenskt etappmål är just den dyrbara och symboliskt inriktade politik planen varnar för. Delar av motförslaget, som stöd till biodrivmedel, ligger dock nära planen.
- billigare drivmedeldecisive»Sänka priset på bensin och diesel så att du klarar din vardagsekonomi« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Lower the price of petrol and diesel so you can manage your everyday finances”
- kostnadseffektiva klimatinsatser»Samtidigt är kostnaden för att minska utsläppen genom internationella klimatinsatser ofta mycket lägre än för att minska utsläppen i Sverige« (2022 manifesto ↗)“At the same time, the cost of reducing emissions through international climate initiatives is often much lower than reducing emissions in Sweden”
- ingen dyrbar symbolpolitik»Klimatpolitiken får aldrig reduceras till dyrbar symbolpolitik eller snäv klimatnationalism.« (party programme ↗)“Climate policy must never be reduced to expensive symbolic politics or narrow climate nationalism.”
- omställning genom elektrifiering»Bygga ut laddstolpar och laddstationer i hela landet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Expand charging points and charging stations throughout the country”
The counter-proposal wants new policy instruments for biofuels and electrification to secure the transport sector's emission targets to 2030.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The counter-proposal wants new policy instruments for biofuels and electrification to secure the transport sector's emission targets to 2030. The plan goes the opposite way: petrol and diesel prices should be lowered through reduced fuel tax and reduced blending mandate, the conversion of the vehicle fleet should be allowed to take time and happen on market terms, and Swedish climate targets should be adjusted to EU level rather than go further. Therefore the plan speaks against the counter-proposal's demands.
Original (Swedish)
Motförslaget vill ha nya styrmedel för biodrivmedel och elektrifiering för att säkra transportsektorns utsläppsmål till 2030. Planen går motsatt väg: bensin- och dieselpriset ska sänkas genom sänkt bränsleskatt och minskad reduktionsplikt, omställningen av fordonsflottan ska få ta tid och ske på marknadens villkor, och de svenska klimatmålen ska anpassas till EU-nivån snarare än gå längre. Därför talar planen emot motförslagets krav.
- reduced blending mandatedecisive»Sänka bensin- och dieselpriset genom sänkt bränsleskatt och minskad reduktionsplikt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Lower petrol and diesel prices through reduced fuel tax and reduced blending mandate.”
- conversion at market pace»En omställning av fordonsflottan behöver både av ekonomiska och ekologiska skäl få ta tid, och ske utifrån marknadens villkor.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“A conversion of the vehicle fleet needs to be given time for both economic and ecological reasons, and to take place according to market conditions.”
- Swedish climate targets to EU level»De svenska klimatmålen bör anpassas till den klimatlagstiftning som finns på EU-nivå för att inte kraven på andra länder ska bli lägre som en konsekvens av att vi gör mer än nödvändigt på bekostnad av vår levnadsstandard och konkurrenskraft.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Swedish climate targets should be adjusted to the climate legislation that exists at EU level so that requirements on other countries will not become lower as a consequence of us doing more than necessary at the expense of our living standards and competitiveness.”
- fewer imported biofuels»Minska användningen av miljöskadliga och dyra biodrivmedel från utlandet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Reduce the use of environmentally harmful and expensive biofuels from abroad”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2025/26:TU9)
- Committee report full text (HD01TU9)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2025/26:1007 — Skyltning längs med allmänna vägar av Christofer Bergenblock (C)
- Motion 2025/26:107 — Tillåtande av klampning och borttransport av fordon vid felparkering av Björn Tidland (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:113 — Utökade möjligheter för Kronofogdemyndigheten att utmäta fordon av Angelica Lundberg (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:1191 — Fordonsbesiktning för ökad trafiksäkerhet av Magnus Resare (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1366 — Översyn av lagstiftningen om fastighetsägares ansvar vid parkeringsövervakning av Dzenan Cisija (S)
- Motion 2025/26:140 — Stänkskydd på personbilar av Angelica Lundberg (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:146 — Parkering mot färdriktningen av Eric Palmqvist och Mattias Eriksson Falk (båda SD)
- Motion 2025/26:1496 — Obligatorisk prisangivelse för el vid tankstationer av Eric Westroth (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:155 — Besiktningsgaranti av Eric Palmqvist (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:1565 — Åtgärder för att stoppa högljudda fordon och streetracing av Gudrun Brunegård (KD)
- Motion 2025/26:170 — Flytt av fordon av Per Söderlund m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:1797 — Förbättrad mobilitet för alla som är beroende av bilen av Magnus Jacobsson m.fl. (KD)
- Motion 2025/26:1933 — Centrala register för arbetsmaskiner och båtar av Marie Nicholson (M)
- Motion 2025/26:196 — Krav på transparens och ansvar för fordonstillverkare samt en teknikneutral definition av miljöbil av Rashid Farivar (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:223 — Motorcyklar i kollektivtrafikfält på statliga vägar av Björn Tidland (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:2431 — Åtgärder för att försvåra för bilmålvakter av Oliver Rosengren m.fl. (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2524 — Möjligheten att svänga höger vid rött ljus av Mattias Eriksson Falk och Roger Hedlund (båda SD)
- Motion 2025/26:2592 — Trafikljus vid övergångsställen med nedräkning av tid av Mattias Eriksson Falk och Roger Hedlund (båda SD)
- Motion 2025/26:2595 — Sekretess för uppgifter i fordonsregistret av Mattias Eriksson Falk och Roger Hedlund (båda SD)
- Motion 2025/26:2614 — Motverkande av ljusföroreningar av Rickard Nordin (C)
Source: The Swedish Parliament