2022-11-232022/23:KrU2 · p.1KrUCulture
Requirements for moderation in gambling marketing
Stricter moderation requirement for gambling marketing
What's at stake: The decision affects how much room gambling companies have to market their products, and how strongly consumers - not least people with gambling problems - are protected against intrusive or misleading gambling advertising.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the government's proposal for a stricter (adjusted) moderation requirement for gambling marketing should be adopted, or whether the current requirement should stand and continue to develop through case-law practice.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee considers it too early to tighten the moderation requirement for gambling marketing since case-law practice in the area has only just been established, and holds that the proposal risks acting as a disguised risk classification that erodes the regulated market for licensed operators. The committee therefore proposes that the Riksdag reject the government's proposal for an adjusted moderation requirement and instead let its precise meaning continue to develop through practice.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 1 (S, V, MP)
The reservation (S, V, MP) opposes the committee majority's handling of the issue and wants the government's stricter moderation requirement for gambling marketing to apply. The reasoning is consumer protection: the moderation requirement is meant to ensure fair, balanced marketing that does not present gambling as socially attractive, intrusive, or a solution to financial problems, and the reservers hold that this protection outweighs the industry's interest in waiting for more case-law to develop.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: Riksdagen avslår regeringens förslag till lag om ändring i spellagen (2018:1138) i de delar det avser 15 kap.
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 1 by S, V, MP.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Abstain 0/0/20/4 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| S | No | No 0/93/0/14 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| MP | No | No 1/14/0/3 | follows the plan | confidence: high | explicit |
| C | Yes | Yes 19/0/0/5 | follows the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| L | No | Yes 13/0/0/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| KD | No | Yes 16/0/0/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| M | Yes | Yes 59/0/0/9 | follows the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| SD | No | Yes 63/0/0/10 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
Broke with the party line
| MPMärta Stenevi (MP, Stockholms län) | Yes — party line: No |
MPs whose vote differs from their party's majority position in this division. Marked with a dark ring in the chamber view.
Committee proposal
Parliament rejects the government's proposal for law amending the Gambling Act (2018:1138) in the parts concerning section 15, chapter 1. Thereby parliament approves the motions 2021/22:4759 by Kristina Axén Olin et al. (M) demand 7 and 2022/23:12 by Jonas Andersson et al. (SD) demand 1 and rejects proposition 2021/22:242 point 5 in this part.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår regeringens förslag till lag om ändring i spellagen (2018:1138) i de delar det avser 15 kap. 1 §. Därmed bifaller riksdagen motionerna 2021/22:4759 av Kristina Axén Olin m.fl. (M) yrkande 7 och 2022/23:12 av Jonas Andersson m.fl. (SD) yrkande 1 och avslår proposition 2021/22:242 punkt 5 i denna del.
Riksdag decision: Parliament said no to parts of the previous government's proposal on strengthened gambling regulation. The measures that parliament said no to concern changes to rules on moderation in gambling marketing termination of the agreement between Sweden and Finland on slot machines on ferries in regular line traffic. Parliament said yes to the other law changes in the proposal. These law changes will enter into force 1 January 2023 and 1 July 2023.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal seeks that the marketing assessment shall specifically consider the risk of gambling problems and exposure to minors. (S, V, MP) — Reservation 1
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan wants to set limits to commercialism and break market power's grip on television and the internet, and holds that social responsibility weighs more heavily than private companies' profit opportunities.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to set limits to commercialism and break market power's grip on television and the internet, and holds that social responsibility weighs more heavily than private companies' profit opportunities. A stricter moderation requirement for gambling advertising is such a limit. The plan does not mention gambling advertising explicitly, but the balance of consumer protection before industry interest follows from its commitments.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill sätta gränser för kommersialismen och bryta marknadsmaktens grepp om tv och internet, och menar att samhällsansvar väger tyngre än privata bolags vinstmöjligheter. Ett skärpt måttfullhetskrav för spelreklam är en sådan gräns. Planen nämner inte spelreklam uttryckligen, men avvägningen konsumentskydd före branschintresse följer av dess åtaganden.
- break market powerdecisive»Marknadsmakten har ett starkt grepp om Internet, tv och kultur.« (party programme ↗)“Market power has a strong grip on the Internet, television and culture.”
- limits to commercialism»Välfärden ska kunna vara en fristad från kommersialiserade relationer.« (party programme ↗)“Welfare shall be able to be a haven from commercialized relations.”
- social responsibility before profit»Det är ett samhällsansvar att stoppa mäns våld mot kvinnor, inte en möjlighet för privata bolag att göra vinst.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It is a social responsibility to stop men's violence against women, not an opportunity for private companies to make a profit.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan's guiding principle is that democracy has priority over the market and that commercial exploitation of people's needs shall be countered.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's guiding principle is that democracy has priority over the market and that commercial exploitation of people's needs shall be countered. A tightened standards requirement for gambling advertising is such a democratic safeguard, and the plan puts children's right to a safe upbringing before industry interests. Consumer protection thus carries more weight than waiting for more practice.
Original (Swedish)
Planens bärande princip är att demokratin har företräde före marknaden och att kommersiell exploatering av människors behov ska motverkas. Ett skärpt måttfullhetskrav för spelreklam är en sådan demokratisk motvikt, och planen sätter barns rätt till en trygg uppväxt före branschens intressen. Konsumentskyddet väger därmed tyngre än att invänta mer praxis.
- democracy before marketdecisive»Demokratin har därför företräde före marknaden.« (party programme ↗)“Democracy therefore has priority over the market.”
- counter commercial exploitation»Människors naturliga längtan efter gemenskap och uppskattning görs till föremål för en hård kommersiell exploatering.« (party programme ↗)“People's natural longing for community and appreciation is made the subject of hard commercial exploitation.”
- safe upbringing for children»Alla barn och ungdomar ska ha rätt till likvärdiga villkor och till en trygg uppväxt fri från droger och våld.« (party programme ↗)“All children and young people shall have the right to equal conditions and to a safe upbringing free from drugs and violence.”
- economy subordinate to democracy»Men ekonomiska intressen har aldrig rätt att sätta gränser för demokratin.« (party programme ↗)“But economic interests can never have the right to set limits for democracy.”
The party programme wants to ban advertising for gambling and limit advertising's spread, especially among children and young people.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme wants to ban advertising for gambling and limit advertising's spread, especially among children and young people. A sharpened code of conduct that prevents gambling being presented as socially attractive or as a solution to economic problems is a step in precisely that direction and is motivated by the same consumer protection the plan calls for. The plan therefore supports the counter-proposal's demand.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet vill förbjuda reklam för spel och begränsa reklamens utbredning, särskilt bland barn och unga. Ett skärpt måttfullhetskrav som hindrar att spel framställs som socialt attraktivt eller som en lösning på ekonomiska problem är ett steg i just den riktningen och motiveras av samma konsumentskydd som planen efterlyser. Planen stöder därför motförslagets krav.
- ban on gambling advertisingdecisive»liksom reklam för spel och alkohol.« (party programme ↗)“like advertising for gambling and alcohol.”
- limited advertising to young people»Vi vill begränsa reklamens utbredning, särskilt bland barn och unga.« (party programme ↗)“We want to limit advertising's spread, especially among children and young people.”
- strong consumer protection»Konsumenter ska ha möjligheter att göra fria och« (party programme ↗)“Consumers should have opportunities to make free and”
- prevent addiction»Personer med beroende- och missbruksproblematik« (party programme ↗)“Persons with addiction and substance abuse problems”
The plan does not address gambling advertising.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan does not address gambling advertising. The closest principles are that everyone shall determine their own life through their own and free choices and that the economy shall have given and predictable rules in a market economy free from planned economy directives. Derived from this the plan speaks against tightening the reasonableness requirement when practice has just been established and tightening risks hollowing out the regulated market.
Original (Swedish)
Planen behandlar inte spelreklam. Närmast liggande principer är att var och en ska bestämma över sitt eget liv genom egna och fria val och att ekonomin ska ha givna och förutsägbara spelregler i en marknadsekonomi fri från planekonomiska pekpinnar. Härlett ur detta talar planen mot att skärpa måttfullhetskravet när praxis just etablerats och skärpningen riskerar urholka den reglerade marknaden.
- individual's free choicesdecisive»Alla ska kunna bestämma över sina egna liv genom egna och fria val.« (party programme ↗)“Everyone shall be able to determine their own lives through their own and free choices.”
- predictable rules»Ekonomin ska ha givna och förutsägbara spelregler« (party programme ↗)“The economy shall have given and predictable rules”
flags: citat_blockerat
The plan does not address gambling advertising directly, but its public-health line is clear: advertising bans and earmarked taxes are used to hold back new recruitment to tobacco, alcohol policy shall be restrictive and addiction is described as a loss of freedom.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan does not address gambling advertising directly, but its public-health line is clear: advertising bans and earmarked taxes are used to hold back new recruitment to tobacco, alcohol policy shall be restrictive and addiction is described as a loss of freedom. At the same time, the plan requires consumer laws that give the right to correct information. This argues for a sharpened good-faith requirement that ensures factual and balanced gaming-market marketing.
Original (Swedish)
Planen behandlar inte spelreklam direkt, men dess folkhälsolinje är tydlig: reklamförbud och punktskatter används för att hålla tillbaka nyrekrytering till tobak, alkoholpolitiken ska vara restriktiv och beroende beskrivs som en förlust av frihet. Samtidigt kräver planen konsumentlagar som ger rätt till korrekt information. Det talar för ett skärpt måttfullhetskrav som säkrar saklig och balanserad spelmarknadsföring.
- advertising restrictions for public-health reasonsdecisive»punktskatter och förbud mot tobaksreklam.« (party programme ↗)“earmarked taxes and bans on tobacco advertising.”
- restrictive alcohol policy»Sverige ska ha en restriktiv alkoholpolitik.« (party programme ↗)“Sweden shall have a restrictive alcohol policy.”
- addiction restricts freedom»Den som blir beroende av droger i någon form förlorar sin frihet.« (party programme ↗)“Anyone who becomes addicted to drugs in any form loses their freedom.”
- strong consumer protection»behövs en stark konkurrenslagstiftning och konsumentlagar som ger rätt till korrekt produktinformation.« (party programme ↗)“requires strong competition law and consumer laws that give the right to correct product information.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The counter-proposal wants to tighten the moderation requirement for gambling advertising with reference to consumer protection.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The counter-proposal wants to tighten the moderation requirement for gambling advertising with reference to consumer protection. Moderation is one of the values the election manifesto explicitly wants to promote, and the party programme establishes that misleading and aggressive marketing methods shall be countered and that preventive efforts for children and young people shall be prioritized. The plan therefore supports a stricter requirement ahead of waiting for further practice.
Original (Swedish)
Motförslaget vill skärpa måttfullhetskravet för spelreklam med hänvisning till konsumentskydd. Måttfullhet är ett av de värden valmanifestet uttryckligen vill främja, och principprogrammet slår fast att vilseledande och aggressiva marknadsföringsmetoder ska motverkas och att förebyggande insatser för barn och unga ska prioriteras. Planen ger därför stöd för ett skärpt krav framför att avvakta ytterligare praxis.
- moderation as a social valuedecisive»medmänsklighet ansvarstagande, förvaltarskap, hederlighet, måttfullhet och jämställdhet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“compassion, responsibility, stewardship, integrity, moderation and equality”
- counter aggressive marketing»aggressiva marknadsföringsmetoder ska motverkas.« (party programme ↗)“aggressive marketing methods shall be countered.”
- prevention for children and young people»I det förebyggande arbetet ska insatser för barn och« (party programme ↗)“In preventive work, efforts for children and”
- strong consumer protection»Fria och självständiga konsumentorganisationer ska uppmuntras.« (party programme ↗)“Free and independent consumer organizations shall be encouraged.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The documents do not address gambling advertising or moderation requirements.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The documents do not address gambling advertising or moderation requirements. The closest principle is that prosperity is built on a dynamic business sector and that regulatory red tape shall be removed, and the party programme's starting point that primary responsibility lies with the individual. Based on that, the plan points toward rejecting a new stricter advertising regulation, but the foundation is weak and the conclusion uncertain.
Original (Swedish)
Dokumenten behandlar inte spelreklam eller måttfullhetskrav. Närmast liggande princip är att välståndet bygger på ett dynamiskt näringsliv och att regelkrångel ska bort, samt partiprogrammets utgångspunkt att huvudansvaret ligger på individen själv. Utifrån det pekar planen mot att avvisa ett nytt skärpt reklamregelverk, men underlaget är svagt och slutsatsen osäker.
- dynamiskt näringslivdecisive»Sveriges välstånd bygger på ett dynamiskt och livskraftigt näringsliv.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden's prosperity is built on a dynamic and vibrant business sector.”
- minskad regelbörda»Ta bort en tredjedel av företagens administrationskostnader och en tredjedel av regelkrånglet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Remove a third of businesses' administrative costs and a third of regulatory red tape”
- individens eget ansvar»Huvudansvaret ligger först och främst på individen.« (party programme ↗)“Primary responsibility lies first and foremost with the individual.”
flags: planen_saknar_spelpolitik
The plan does not address gambling advertising, but the socially conservative starting point is that society should maintain norms that help the individual and that young people's psychological ill-health is the most important health issue.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan does not address gambling advertising, but the socially conservative starting point is that society should maintain norms that help the individual and that young people's psychological ill-health is the most important health issue. A sharpened reasonableness requirement that prevents gambling from being presented as socially attractive or as a solution to economic problems comes closest to these principles, whereas the industry's interest in more practice lacks support in the plan. The conclusion is derived and the basis weak.
Original (Swedish)
Planen behandlar inte spelreklam, men den socialkonservativa utgångspunkten är att samhället ska upprätthålla normer som hjälper individen och att ungas psykiska ohälsa är den viktigaste hälsofrågan. Ett skärpt måttfullhetskrav som hindrar att spel framställs som socialt attraktivt eller som lösning på ekonomiska problem ligger närmast dessa principer, medan branschens intresse av mer praxis inte har stöd i planen. Slutsatsen är härledd och underlaget svagt.
- prioritize young people's mental healthdecisive»Psykisk ohälsa utgör den viktigaste hälsofrågan för unga och här krävs ett brett handlingsprogram.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Psychological ill-health is the most important health issue for young people and here a broad action programme is required.”
- protect young people»Stärka insatserna för att förbättra ungas psykiska hälsa« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strengthen efforts to improve young people's mental health.”
- the child's best interests»Att barnets bästa alltid ska beaktas« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The child's best interests shall always be considered.”
- opposing regulatory restraint»Nya regler ska vara kostnadseffektiva och befintliga regler behöver ses över.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“New rules must be cost-effective and existing rules need to be reviewed.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2022/23:KrU2)
- Committee report full text (HA01KrU2)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2021/22:4755 — med anledning av prop. 2021/22:242 En förstärkt spelreglering av Vasiliki Tsouplaki m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2021/22:4758 — med anledning av prop. 2021/22:242 En förstärkt spelreglering av Catarina Deremar m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2021/22:4759 — med anledning av prop. 2021/22:242 En förstärkt spelreglering av Kristina Axén Olin m.fl. (M)
- Motion 2021/22:4760 — med anledning av prop. 2021/22:242 En förstärkt spelreglering av Roland Utbult m.fl. (KD)
- Motion 2021/22:4761 — med anledning av prop. 2021/22:242 En förstärkt spelreglering av Jonas Andersson i Linghem m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2022/23:12 — med anledning av prop. 2021/22:242 En förstärkt spelreglering av Jonas Andersson m.fl. (SD)
- Proposition 2021/22:242 — En förstärkt spelreglering
Source: The Swedish Parliament