2026-02-252025/26:CU15 · p.13CUCivil law & housing

Settlement arrangements

The debt set-off order in enforcement proceedings

What's at stake: Under the current arrangement, the debt of someone subject to enforcement can keep growing even though the person is paying continuously, because payments first go toward interest and fees. A changed set-off order would reduce the actual debt amount faster and could help over-indebted people out of their situation, but the question is whether this should be decided now or wait for a broader inquiry into over-indebtedness.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

The question is whether the rules on how funds collected through enforcement are set off should be changed now, so that they are applied first against the principal amount of the debt rather than against interest and fees, or whether parliament should wait for the results of an ongoing government inquiry into over-indebtedness before making any change.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The committee notes that the government has commissioned an inquiry to consider measures to reduce the problem of over-indebtedness, including a review of the debt set-off order. The committee considers that the outcome of this ongoing work should not be pre-empted by any action from parliament, and the motions are rejected.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 8 (S, V, C)

The reservation (S, V, C) describes how the current set-off order - where funds collected are first applied against interest and fees and only then against the principal - often leads to a difficult financial situation in which the total debt keeps growing despite continuous repayments. The reservation welcomes the fact that an inquiry has been tasked with reviewing the set-off order, but wants the government to subsequently return with a legislative proposal so that funds collected for claims held by the Enforcement Authority are applied first against the principal amount.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 8 by S, V, C.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
Vown reservationNoNo 0/18/0/4follows the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
Sown reservationNoNo 0/93/0/13follows the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
MPNoYes 16/0/0/2departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed
Cown reservationNoNo 0/21/0/3follows the planconfidence: lownot addressed
LNoYes 13/0/0/3departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
KDNoYes 17/0/0/2departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed
MNoYes 60/0/0/8departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed
SDNoYes 62/0/0/9departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed

Committee proposal

Parliament rejects the motions 2025/26:972 by Andreas Lennkvist Manriquez et al. (V) demand 9, 2025/26:1898 by Mattias Jonsson and Dzenan Cisija (both S), 2025/26:3181 by Alireza Akhondi et al. (C) demand 17, and 2025/26:3649 by Joakim Järrebring et al. (S) demand 13.

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2025/26:972 av Andreas Lennkvist Manriquez m.fl. (V) yrkande 9, 2025/26:1898 av Mattias Jonsson och Dzenan Cisija (båda S), 2025/26:3181 av Alireza Akhondi m.fl. (C) yrkande 17 och 2025/26:3649 av Joakim Järrebring m.fl. (S) yrkande 13.

Riksdag decision: Parliament rejected 36 proposals in motions from the general motion period 2025. The proposals concern, among other things, compensation law matters, such as questions about insurance and damages. Others concern insolvency and enforcement law matters, for example what should apply to persons who cannot pay their debts. Parliament refers, among other things, to current regulations and that work is already underway in many of the matters covered by the proposals.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietNoNofollows the plannot addressed

The plan establishes that debt weakens people's independence and bargaining power and that the regulation of loan terms shall be based on our common needs rather than financial capital's.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan establishes that debt weakens people's independence and bargaining power and that the regulation of loan terms shall be based on our common needs rather than financial capital's. An accounting arrangement where payments go first to the principal amount counteracts debt growing despite continuous payments and thus follows from that commitment. The plan also requires stricter regulation of banks' societal-impact activities.

Original (Swedish)

Planen slår fast att skuldsättning försvagar människors självständighet och förhandlingsstyrka och att regleringen av lånevillkor ska utgå från våra gemensamma behov snarare än finanskapitalets. En avräkningsordning där inbetalningar först går till kapitalbeloppet motverkar att skulden växer trots kontinuerliga avbetalningar och följer därmed av det åtagandet. Planen kräver också hårdare reglering av bankernas samhällspåverkande verksamhet.

  • debt weakens peopledecisive»Skuldsättning försvagar många människors självständighet och« (party programme ↗)“Debt weakens many people's independence and”
  • loan terms based on common needs»Regleringen av lånevillkor behöver utgå från« (party programme ↗)“The regulation of loan terms needs to be based on”
  • stricter regulation of banks»demokratiseras. Tills dess behövs en hårdare reglering av bankernas« (party programme ↗)“is democratized. Until then, stricter regulation of banks'”
SSocialdemokraternaNoNofollows the plannot addressed

The party programme wants to see a strong society that protects those in a vulnerable position and a social policy that bridges gaps and liberates people.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The party programme wants to see a strong society that protects those in a vulnerable position and a social policy that bridges gaps and liberates people. A settlement order where debt grows despite continuous installments locks people in over-indebtedness and counteracts precisely that. The plan therefore supports the requirement for legislation that lets payments first go toward the principal.

Original (Swedish)

Partiprogrammet vill se ett starkt samhälle som skyddar den som befinner sig i en utsatt position och en socialpolitik som utjämnar klyftor och frigör människor. En avräkningsordning där skulden växer trots kontinuerliga avbetalningar låser fast människor i överskuldsättning och motverkar just det. Planen stöder därför kravet på lagstiftning som låter inbetalningar först gå till kapitalbeloppet.

  • protection for the vulnerabledecisive»Socialdemokratin vill se ett starkt samhälle som skyddar den som befinner sig i en utsatt position« (party programme ↗)“The Social Democrats want to see a strong society that protects those in a vulnerable position”
  • social policy that liberates»En socialpolitik som utjämnar klyftor och frigör människor.« (party programme ↗)“A social policy that bridges gaps and liberates people.”
  • social safety net»Socialt skyddsnät under hela livet, med robusta socialförsäkringar och stöd till dem« (party programme ↗)“Social safety net throughout life, with robust social insurance and support for those”
  • against poverty»Ett samhälle där barn inte växer upp i fattigdom.« (party programme ↗)“A society where children do not grow up in poverty.”
MPMiljöpartietNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan does not address the order of set-off, but stipulates that everyone has a right to basic economic security and that support for those who have least shall be strengthened.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan does not address the order of set-off, but stipulates that everyone has a right to basic economic security and that support for those who have least shall be strengthened. An order in which debt grows despite continuous repayments hits precisely those with the smallest margins and counteracts the plan's goal of reducing economic inequality. Letting payments first be deducted from the principal amount therefore follows from the plan's distribution principle, albeit derived.

Original (Swedish)

Planen behandlar inte avräkningsordningen, men slår fast att alla har rätt till grundläggande ekonomisk trygghet och att stöden till dem som har minst ska förstärkas. En ordning där skulden växer trots kontinuerliga avbetalningar drabbar just dem med minsta marginaler och motverkar planens mål att utjämna de ekonomiska klyftorna. Att låta inbetalningar först räknas av mot kapitalbeloppet följer därför av planens fördelningsprincip, om än härlett.

  • support for those with smallest marginsdecisive»De med minst resurser ska få mer samhällsservice, lägre skatt och mer stöd i omställningen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Those with fewest resources shall receive more public services, lower taxes and more support in transition.”
  • basic economic security»Alla har rätt till en grundläggande ekonomisk trygghet.« (party programme ↗)“Everyone has a right to basic economic security.”
  • reduce economic inequality»Skattesystemet ska motverka ett klassamhälle genom att utjämna de ekonomiska« (party programme ↗)“The tax system shall counteract a class society by reducing economic”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

CCenterpartietNoNofollows the plannot addressed

The plan does not address the repayment system, but the election manifesto's core commitment is to strengthen household finances and ease the burden for those with small margins, and that points toward an arrangement where repayments actually reduce debt.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan does not address the repayment system, but the election manifesto's core commitment is to strengthen household finances and ease the burden for those with small margins, and that points toward an arrangement where repayments actually reduce debt. The party programme warns against thresholds that lock people into vulnerability instead of giving them a new chance. The conclusion is derived from general commitments and therefore uncertain.

Original (Swedish)

Planen behandlar inte avräkningsordningen, men valmanifestets bärande åtagande är att stärka hushållens ekonomi och mildra effekterna för dem med små marginaler, och det pekar mot en ordning där avbetalningar faktiskt minskar skulden. Partiprogrammet varnar för trösklar som låser fast människor i utsatthet i stället för att ge dem en ny chans. Slutsatsen är härledd ur allmänna åtaganden och därför osäker.

  • support for households with small marginsdecisive»För att möta detta krävs insatser som mildrar inflationens värsta effekter för dem med små marginaler.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“To meet this requires measures that ease the worst effects of inflation for those with small margins.”
  • stronger households»Sverige behöver en ekonomisk politik som skapar fler jobb, mer frihet och starkare hushåll.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden needs an economic policy that creates more jobs, more freedom and stronger households.”
  • thresholds must not lock people in»Samtidigt får inte bidragsfällor och trösklar göra det olönsamt att återgå« (party programme ↗)“At the same time, benefit traps and thresholds must not make it unprofitable to return”
  • ease the burden for low-income earners»Det förstärkta amorteringskravet — ett påtvingat sparande för dem med lägst inkomster — bör avskaffas när ränteläget nu normaliseras.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The strengthened amortisation requirement — forced saving for those with the lowest incomes — should be abolished as interest rates now normalise.”
LLiberalernaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The party programme commits to changing rules so that over-indebted people have greater opportunities to become debt-free, which is precisely the effect the counter-proposal wants to achieve by letting payments first and foremost be deducted from the principal.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The party programme commits to changing rules so that over-indebted people have greater opportunities to become debt-free, which is precisely the effect the counter-proposal wants to achieve by letting payments first and foremost be deducted from the principal. The programme also wants to strengthen the individual's position through improved consumer and contract law and access to budget and debt advice. The plan, however, does not address whether current proceedings should be pre-empted.

Original (Swedish)

Partiprogrammet åtar sig att reglerna ska ändras så att överskuldsatta får större möjlighet att bli skuldfria, vilket är just den effekt motförslaget vill uppnå genom att låta inbetalda medel i första hand avräknas mot kapitalbeloppet. Programmet vill dessutom stärka den enskildes ställning genom förbättrad konsument- och avtalslagstiftning samt tillgång till budget- och skuldrådgivning. Planen berör däremot inte frågan om pågående beredning bör föregripas.

  • debt freedom for over-indebteddecisive»Reglerna för skuldsanering ska ändras så att överskuldsatta får större möjlighet att bli skuldfria.« (party programme ↗)“Rules for debt relief shall be changed so that over-indebted people have greater opportunity to become debt-free.”
  • stronger consumer law»Den enskildes inflytande över de avtal som ingås i vardagen behöver stärkas genom förbättrad konsument- och avtalslagstiftning.« (party programme ↗)“The individual's influence over the agreements entered into in everyday life needs to be strengthened through improved consumer and contract law.”
  • budget and debt advice»Konsumenter ska ha tillgång till budget- och skuldrådgivning och opartisk konsumentvägledning i hela landet.« (party programme ↗)“Consumers should have access to budget and debt advice and neutral consumer guidance throughout the country.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

KDKristdemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan's goal for social policy is to support individuals towards self-sufficiency, and the principle of solidarity justifies a special responsibility for the vulnerable.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan's goal for social policy is to support individuals towards self-sufficiency, and the principle of solidarity justifies a special responsibility for the vulnerable. A settlement arrangement where the debt grows despite continuous payments counteracts both these commitments. The plan also requires that the individual to the greatest possible extent retains his own income before supplementary benefits. A legislative proposal on settlement against the principal amount is therefore in line with the plan, which however does not directly address the settlement arrangement.

Original (Swedish)

Planens mål för socialpolitiken är att stödja enskilda till egen försörjning, och solidaritetsprincipen motiverar ett särskilt ansvar för de utsatta. En avräkningsordning där skulden växer trots kontinuerliga avbetalningar motverkar båda dessa åtaganden. Planen kräver också att den enskilde i största möjliga utsträckning får behålla sin egen inkomst före kompletterande bidrag. Ett lagförslag om avräkning mot kapitalbeloppet ligger därför i linje med planen, som dock inte behandlar avräkningsordningen direkt.

  • support towards self-sufficiencydecisive»Målet för socialpolitiken är att stödja gemenskaperna och de enskilda människorna« (party programme ↗)“The goal of social policy is to support the communities and individual people”
  • solidarity with the vulnerable»Solidaritetsprincipen motiverar oss att ta gemensamt ansvar för alla människor« (party programme ↗)“The principle of solidarity justifies us taking joint responsibility for all people”
  • retain own income»den enskilde i största möjliga utsträckning får behålla sin egen lön eller« (party programme ↗)“the individual to the greatest possible extent retains his own wage or”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MModeraternaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan does not address the order of repayment or over-indebtedness.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan does not address the order of repayment or over-indebtedness. The closest principles are that there shall always be a way back for those who have failed and that control over one's own economy is one of the most important foundations for freedom and security. An order where payments first reduce capital debt makes that way back possible, which argues for the counter-proposal, if on weak grounds.

Original (Swedish)

Planen behandlar inte avräkningsordningen eller överskuldsättning. Närmast liggande principer är att det alltid ska finnas en väg tillbaka för den som misslyckats och att kontrollen över den egna ekonomin är en av de viktigaste grunderna för frihet och trygghet. En ordning där avbetalningar först minskar kapitalskulden gör den vägen tillbaka möjlig, vilket talar för motförslaget, om än på svagt underlag.

  • a way backdecisive»Det ska alltid finnas en väg tillbaka för den som misslyckats« (party programme ↗)“There shall always be a way back for those who have failed”
  • control over own economy»att ha kontroll över sin egen ekonomi är en av de viktigaste« (party programme ↗)“to have control over one's own economy is one of the most important”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

SDSverigedemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan does not address the payment order in debt collection.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan does not address the payment order in debt collection. The nearest principle is that economic security for ordinary wage earners shall increase and that Swedish justice and welfare shall be put first, as shall combating social vulnerability such as homelessness. Payments being first applied against the principal amount prevents debt from growing despite instalments and aligns with this. The conclusion is uncertain.

Original (Swedish)

Planen behandlar inte avräkningsordningen vid indrivning. Den närmast liggande principen är att den ekonomiska tryggheten för vanliga löntagare ska öka och att svenskt rättsväsende och välfärd ska sättas i första rummet, liksom att social utsatthet som hemlöshet ska bekämpas. Att inbetalningar i första hand avräknas mot kapitalbeloppet motverkar att skulden växer trots avbetalningar och ligger i linje med detta. Slutsatsen är osäker.

  • economic securitydecisive»Öka den ekonomiska tryggheten för löntagare« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Increase economic security for wage earners”
  • citizens' interests first»Sverigedemokraterna vill istället att svenskt rättsväsende, välfärd och industri ska sättas i första rummet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden Democrats want instead for Swedish justice, welfare, and industry to be put first.”
  • combat social vulnerability»Att bekämpa hemlöshet är en prioriterad social fråga för Sverigedemokraterna.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Fighting homelessness is a prioritized social issue for the Sweden Democrats.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament