2024-04-032023/24:SoU15 · p.9SoUHealth & social services
Leisure Card
Design of the leisure card for children and young people
What's at stake: The leisure card is meant to give more children and young people access to sports and leisure activities. The decision affects whether the reform mainly benefits already-active middle-class children or is designed to also reach children from socioeconomically weaker households.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether parliament should direct requirements at the government on how the leisure card should be designed and followed up — including a check-in point after one year — to ensure the reform reaches children and young people from socioeconomically weaker households, or whether the government's ongoing design work is sufficient.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The Committee on Health and Welfare notes that, under the government's decision, the leisure card is specifically meant to give children and young people from socioeconomically disadvantaged households greater opportunities to take part in leisure activities, and that the Public Health Agency has been tasked with developing a model to follow up and evaluate the card's effects. The committee therefore sees no need for further measures, and the motions are rejected.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 11 (S)
The Social Democrats want to ensure that the leisure card does not merely become a reform for already-active middle-class children but genuinely reaches children and young people from socioeconomically weaker households, that its design is developed in close dialogue with civil society organizations and does not become administratively burdensome or open to fraud, and that the government introduce a check-in point one year after implementation to ensure the reform reaches all children.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 11 by S.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Yes 21/0/0/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| S | No | No 0/92/0/14 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| MP | No | Yes 14/0/0/4 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| C | No | Yes 21/0/0/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| L | No | Yes 14/0/0/2 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| KD | No | Yes 15/0/0/4 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| M | No | Yes 60/0/0/8 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| SD | No | Yes 63/0/0/9 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2023/24:2617 by Fredrik Lundh Sammeli et al. (S) motions 107 and 108 as well as 2023/24:2686 by Lawen Redar et al. (S) motion 38.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2023/24:2617 av Fredrik Lundh Sammeli m.fl. (S) yrkandena 107 och 108 samt 2023/24:2686 av Lawen Redar m.fl. (S) yrkande 38.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag rejected approximately 100 proposals on public health in motions from the general motion period of 2023. The Riksdag mainly refers to the fact that work is already underway within the issues that the proposals address. The motions deal with, among other things, vaccination and allergy issues, healthy lifestyle habits and mental health.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants the government to introduce a national strategy for children's and young people's right to equal health and implement socially preventive health measures. (S) — Reservation 11
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The election manifesto requires that children and young people are given opportunities for municipally supported leisure activities and points out that sports have been depleted as fees have risen.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto requires that children and young people are given opportunities for municipally supported leisure activities and points out that sports have been depleted as fees have risen. The counter-proposal's requirement that the leisure card actually reaches children from socioeconomically weak households, is designed in dialogue with associations and is followed up with a control station is in line with the plan's redistribution perspective. The plan also values strong and independent civil movements.
Original (Swedish)
Valplattformen kräver att barn och ungdomar får möjligheter till kommunalt stödda fritidsaktiviteter och pekar på att idrotten utarmats när avgifter stigit. Motförslagets krav på att fritidskortet faktiskt når barn från socioekonomiskt svaga hushåll, utformas i dialog med föreningslivet och följs upp med en kontrollstation ligger i linje med planens omfördelningsperspektiv. Planen värnar också starka och självständiga folkrörelser.
- supported leisure activities for childrendecisive»Ge barn och ungdomar möjligheter till kommunalt stödda fritidsaktiviteter, ge skolan bättre resurser för att stödja elever som behöver det för att klara betygen och förstärk socialtjänsten med tillräckliga resurser och kunskap för att arbeta både förebyggande och med barnskydd.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Give children and young people opportunities for municipally supported leisure activities, give schools better resources to support students who need it to pass grades and strengthen social services with sufficient resources and knowledge to work both preventively and with child protection.”
- redistribution to disadvantaged areas»Det är möjligt, men det kräver en annan politik och att vi omfördelar resurserna från rika till fattiga människor, från rika områden till fattiga områden och förorter.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It is possible, but it requires a different policy and that we redistribute resources from rich to poor people, from rich areas to poor areas and suburbs.”
- independent associational life»starka och självständiga folkrörelser« (party programme ↗)“strong and independent civil movements”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan requires that access to leisure activities at reasonable costs increases and that the parents' wallet should not determine, and that the most vulnerable get more resources.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that access to leisure activities at reasonable costs increases and that the parents' wallet should not determine, and that the most vulnerable get more resources. The counter-proposal's demand that the leisure card actually reaches children from socioeconomically weaker households and is followed up after a year is the same ambition. The plan moreover wants policy to be shaped in dialogue with citizens' own organizations and that cheating with public funds is stopped.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att tillgången till fritidsaktiviteter till rimliga kostnader ökar och att föräldrarnas plånbok inte ska avgöra, samt att de mest utsatta får mer resurser. Motförslagets krav på att fritidskortet verkligen når barn från socioekonomiskt svagare hushåll och följs upp efter ett år är samma ambition. Planen vill också att politiken formas i dialog med medborgarnas egna organisationer och att fusk med offentliga medel stoppas.
- leisure independent of walletdecisive»Tillgången till fritidsaktiviteter till rimliga kostnader, både vad gäller idrott och kultur, behöver öka. Föräldrarnas plånbok ska inte avgöra.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Access to leisure activities at reasonable costs, both for sports and culture, needs to increase. The parents' wallet should not determine.”
- resources to the most vulnerable»De mest utsatta skolorna och förskolorna måste få mer resurser.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The most vulnerable schools and preschools must get more resources.”
- dialogue with civil society»medborgarnas eget engagemang och medborgarnas egna organisationer« (party programme ↗)“citizens' own engagement and citizens' own organizations”
- stop cheating with public funds»Skattefusk, välfärdsbrottslighet och penningtvätt ska stoppas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Tax fraud, welfare crime and money laundering shall be stopped.”
The party programme notes that children in economically vulnerable families have less access to recreational activities and wants to give increased resources to the worst-off families.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme notes that children in economically vulnerable families have less access to recreational activities and wants to give increased resources to the worst-off families. There must be plenty of places where children and young people can pursue outdoor life, sports and culture. That the recreation card actually reaches socioeconomically weak households and is followed up thus lies in line with the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet konstaterar att barn i ekonomiskt utsatta familjer har sämre tillgång till fritidsaktiviteter och vill ge ökade resurser till de sämst ställda familjerna. Det ska finnas gott om platser där barn och unga kan utöva friluftsliv, idrott och kultur. Att säkerställa att fritidskortet faktiskt når socioekonomiskt svaga hushåll och följs upp ligger därför i linje med planen.
- vulnerable children's access to recreationdecisive»Barn i familjer i ekonomisk utsatthet har också sämre tillgång till fritidsaktiviteter.« (party programme ↗)“Children in families in economic vulnerability also have less access to recreational activities.”
- resources to the worst-off»Det behövs en politik som ger ökade resurser till de sämst ställda familjerna« (party programme ↗)“There is a need for a policy that gives increased resources to the worst-off families”
- meeting places for children and young people»Det behövs gott om platser där barn och unga kan mötas och utöva friluftsliv, idrott och kultur.« (party programme ↗)“There is a need for plenty of places where children and young people can meet and pursue outdoor life, sports and culture.”
- after-school for all children»satsa mer på fritidshemmen och se till att även de barn vars föräldrar inte arbetar får tillgång till fritids.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“invest more in after-school programs and ensure that even children whose parents do not work have access to after-school care.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan wants to make leisure activities accessible to all children, particularly to strengthen integration and equality, and highlights the role of popular movements for trust and community.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to make leisure activities accessible to all children, particularly to strengthen integration and equality, and highlights the role of popular movements for trust and community. To ensure that the leisure pass actually reaches children from socioeconomically weaker households and is designed in dialogue with the voluntary sector without administrative burden follows from this. The party programme's requirement that politics shall remove obstacles for civil society speaks against complicated administration.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill göra fritidsverksamhet tillgänglig för alla barn, särskilt för att stärka integration och jämlikhet, och lyfter folkrörelsernas roll för tillit och gemenskap. Att säkerställa att fritidskortet verkligen når barn från socioekonomiskt svagare hushåll och utformas i dialog med föreningslivet utan administrativ börda följer av det. Partiprogrammets krav på att politiken ska riva hinder för civilsamhället talar mot krånglig administration.
- leisure activities accessible to all childrendecisive»Vi vill göra förskola och fritidsverksamhet tillgänglig för alla« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to make preschool and leisure activities accessible to everyone”
- value of the voluntary sector»Idrottsrörelsen och Sveriges folkrörelser gör värdefulla insatser för att bygga tillit och gemenskap.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The sports movement and Sweden's popular movements make valuable contributions to building trust and community.”
- remove administrative obstacles»Politikens uppgift är att riva hinder och röja väg för denna utvecklingskraft.« (party programme ↗)“Politics' task is to remove obstacles and clear the way for this development force.”
- reach the most disadvantaged children»När vi stärker möjligheterna för dem som har det sämst lyfter vi hela samhället.« (party programme ↗)“When we strengthen the opportunities for those who have it worst, we lift up society as a whole.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan prioritizes increasing freedom for those with the least freedom and particularly highlights that activities for children in vulnerable situations must maintain high quality.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan prioritizes increasing freedom for those with the least freedom and particularly highlights that activities for children in vulnerable situations must maintain high quality. A leisure pass that in practice only reaches already active children would miss that goal, which is why the requirement for follow-up and targeting precision is in line with the plan. Designing support in dialogue with the voluntary sector also responds to the plan's requirement to respect civil society's independence.
Original (Swedish)
Planen prioriterar att öka friheten för dem som har minst frihet och lyfter särskilt fram att verksamheter för barn i utsatta situationer måste hålla hög kvalitet. Ett fritidskort som i praktiken bara når redan aktiva barn skulle missa det målet, varför kravet på uppföljning och träffsäkerhet ligger i linje med planen. Att utforma stödet i dialog med föreningslivet svarar också mot planens krav på respekt för civilsamhällets oberoende.
- prioritize those with least freedomdecisive»friheten för dem som har minst frihet.« (party programme ↗)“freedom for those with the least freedom.”
- quality for vulnerable children»och ungdomar är därför särskilt viktig för barn i utsatta situationer.« (party programme ↗)“and young people is therefore particularly important for children in vulnerable situations.”
- support for civil society in vulnerable areas»Det demokratiska civilsamhället i utsatta områden ska stödjas mer – särskilt kvinnors och flickors organisering.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Civil society in vulnerable areas shall be supported more—in particular women's and girls' organizing.”
- respect for civil society independence»Det offentliga ska i sin samverkan med civilsamhället respektera« (party programme ↗)“The public shall in its cooperation with civil society respect”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The party programme requires that in the design of leisure support the state ensures children are given equal conditions and that voluntary activity is prioritised above commercial interests in leisure policy.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme requires that in the design of leisure support the state ensures children are given equal conditions and that voluntary activity is prioritised above commercial interests in leisure policy. The counter-proposal's requirement that the card truly reaches socioeconomically weaker households, is designed in dialogue with the voluntary sector and is followed up with a control station follows from this and from the fact that evaluation and quality control are important political tasks.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet kräver att man vid utformningen av fritidsstödet bevakar att barn ges likvärdiga förutsättningar och att ideell verksamhet prioriteras framför kommersiella intressen i fritidspolitiken. Motförslagets krav på att kortet verkligen når socioekonomiskt svagare hushåll, utformas i dialog med föreningslivet och följs upp med en kontrollstation följer av detta och av att utvärdering och kvalitetskontroll är viktiga politiska uppgifter.
- equal conditions in the supportdecisive»Vid utformningen av stödet är det viktigt att bevaka att flickor och pojkar ges likvärdiga förutsättningar« (party programme ↗)“In the design of support it is important to ensure that girls and boys are given equal conditions”
- voluntary sector before commercial interests»Ideell verksamhet ska prioriteras framför kommersiella intressen vid utformningen av statens och kommunernas fritidspolitik.« (party programme ↗)“Voluntary activity shall be prioritised above commercial interests in the design of the state's and municipalities' leisure policy.”
- follow-up and control»Utvärdering, kostnadsuppföljning och kvalitetskontroll« (party programme ↗)“Evaluation, cost follow-up and quality control”
- sport for all children»Hälsa, motion och olika former av idrott ska främjas och stödjas av kommunerna.« (party programme ↗)“Health, exercise and various forms of sport shall be promoted and supported by the municipalities.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan explicitly wants to direct efforts to children and young people in vulnerable areas through a special sports initiative, which is the same purpose as the counter-proposal's requirement that the leisure card actually reaches socioeconomically disadvantaged households.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan explicitly wants to direct efforts to children and young people in vulnerable areas through a special sports initiative, which is the same purpose as the counter-proposal's requirement that the leisure card actually reaches socioeconomically disadvantaged households. The plan also has a strong commitment against fraud with public funds and against administrative burden, which corresponds to requirements for fraud protection and simple design. A control point after one year is in line with readiness to evaluate and reconsider reforms.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill uttryckligen rikta insatser till barn och unga i utsatta områden genom ett särskilt idrottslyft, vilket är samma syfte som motförslagets krav på att fritidskortet faktiskt når socioekonomiskt svaga hushåll. Planen har dessutom ett starkt åtagande mot fusk med offentliga medel och mot administrativ börda, vilket motsvarar kraven på fuskskydd och enkel utformning. En kontrollstation efter ett år ligger i linje med beredskapen att utvärdera och ompröva reformer.
- sport in vulnerable areasdecisive»Genomföra ett särskilt idrottslyft för utsatta områden« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Implement a special sports initiative for vulnerable areas”
- stop fraud with public funds»I ett första steg är målet att halvera bidragsbrotten under nästa mandatperiod.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“In a first step the goal is to halve subsidy fraud in the next term.”
- low administrative burden»Ta bort en tredjedel av företagens administrationskostnader och en tredjedel av regelkrånglet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Remove one-third of companies' administrative costs and one-third of regulatory red tape”
- evaluate implemented reforms»beredskap för att utvärdera, ompröva, förändra och förbättra« (party programme ↗)“readiness to evaluate, reconsider, change and improve”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan demands clear results for every public investment and that fraud and systems that encourage fraud be countered.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan demands clear results for every public investment and that fraud and systems that encourage fraud be countered. The counter-proposal's demand for a checkpoint after one year, a design in dialogue with the sports movement without administrative burden or fraud risk, and that the card truly reaches socioeconomically disadvantaged children follow from these commitments. The plan also wants to give everyone access to sports regardless of background and promote the sports movement.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver tydliga resultat för varje offentlig satsning och att fusk samt system som lockar till fusk motverkas. Motförslagets krav på en kontrollstation efter ett år, en utformning i dialog med föreningslivet utan administrativ tyngd eller fuskrisk, och att kortet verkligen når socioekonomiskt svaga barn följer av dessa åtaganden. Planen vill också ge alla tillgång till idrott oavsett bakgrund och främja föreningslivet.
- results requirement and follow-updecisive»Begära tydliga resultat för varje offentlig satsning« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Demand clear results for every public investment”
- equal access to sports»Ge alla tillgång till idrott oavsett kön, ålder eller kulturell bakgrund« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Give everyone access to sports regardless of gender, age or cultural background”
- counter fraud in systems»Både fusk och sådana system som tenderar att locka till fusk och korruption ska motverkas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Both fraud and systems that tend to encourage fraud and corruption should be countered.”
- promote the sports movement»Samhället bör i större utsträckning tillgodose behovet av idrottsanläggningar, främja föreningslivet och underlätta elitklubbar att bedriva verksamhet på en nivå som mäter sig i internationell konkurrens.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Society should to a greater extent meet the need for sports facilities, promote the sports movement and facilitate elite clubs to conduct activities at a level that measures up to international competition.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2023/24:SoU15)
- Committee report full text (HB01SoU15)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2023/24:1005 — Fler behöver TBE-vaccination av Åsa Westlund och Mathias Tegnér (båda S)
- Motion 2023/24:1171 — Barnaga klassat som folkhälsoproblem av Markus Wiechel (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:1173 — Ett utvecklat folkhälsoarbete av Markus Wiechel (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:1191 — Internationellt kris- och hälsosamarbete av Markus Wiechel (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:120 — Utredning av anmälnings- eller tillståndsplikt för kyltornsanläggningar av Eric Palmqvist (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:1258 — Förbättrad hälsa hos barn och unga av Anders Ådahl (C)
- Motion 2023/24:1276 — Minskning av den antimikrobiella resistensen både nationellt och internationellt av Marie-Louise Hänel Sandström m.fl. (M)
- Motion 2023/24:1306 — Avgiftsfritt TBE-vaccin för barn av Adrian Magnusson m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2023/24:1402 — Lex Rebecka - att orka leva, att våga leva av Ann-Sofie Alm (M)
- Motion 2023/24:1423 — Preventiva insatser mot suicid hos äldre av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2023/24:1479 — Gratis TBE-vaccin för barn och unga under 18 år av Louise Thunström och Sofia Skönnbrink (båda S)
- Motion 2023/24:1512 — Främjande av vaccinering mot TBE i riskområden som Blekinge av Heléne Björklund (S)
- Motion 2023/24:171 — Ohälsosamma livsmedels påverkan på folkhälsan av Angelica Lundberg (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:1712 — Antibiotikaresistens är fortfarande ett globalt hälsoproblem av Margareta Cederfelt (M)
- Motion 2023/24:1799 — Kriskommission för barns och ungas psykiska hälsa av Lili André och Hans Eklind (båda KD)
- Motion 2023/24:189 — Psykisk ohälsa bland skuldsatta samt självmord av Magnus Jacobsson (KD)
- Motion 2023/24:1915 — Utökning av vaccinationsprogrammet för barn så att det också gäller TBE-vaccin av Magnus Manhammar (S)
- Motion 2023/24:1933 — Suicidprevention av Sofia Amloh och Louise Thunström (båda S)
- Motion 2023/24:2063 — En kvalitativ cancervård i framkant av Carina Ståhl Herrstedt m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:2066 — Astma- och allergivården i Sverige av Carina Ståhl Herrstedt m.fl. (SD)
Source: The Swedish Parliament