2023-01-252022/23:KU16 · p.2KUConstitution

Secrecy at the Swedish Social Insurance Agency for information used to identify electrical facilities in matters on support for electricity users

Confidentiality at the Swedish Social Insurance Agency for data that identifies electricity installations in electricity-support cases

What's at stake: The Social Insurance Agency collects personal, address and consumption data for every household in the relevant electricity areas in order to pay out electricity support. If installation IDs are combined with consumption and address data, the compilation can resemble registers that grid companies and electricity suppliers treat as trade secrets, raising the question of how much public insight there should be into an agency's handling of sensitive data about companies and households.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

The question is whether data used to identify individual electricity installations (so-called installation IDs) should be covered by confidentiality at the Swedish Social Insurance Agency in electricity-support cases, in order to protect trade secrets and prevent misuse, or whether such data should continue to be public in line with the principle of public access to official documents.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The committee shares the government's assessment that there is a need for confidentiality regarding data used to identify electrical installations in electricity-support cases. The reason is that a compilation of installation IDs with consumption and address data can, in practice, resemble a customer register that grid companies and electricity suppliers treat as a trade secret, and that such data, if made available to outsiders, risks being misused by unscrupulous actors in ways that cause the companies concerned financial harm - while the data has no bearing on the size of the support and therefore no clear public-interest value.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 2 (V, C, MP)

The reservation (V, C, MP) opposes confidentiality for installation-ID data. The reasoning is that several consultation bodies expressed doubts about the need for it, that the Council on Legislation considered it impossible to judge the matter based on the material presented, and that the reasons put forward by the government are not sufficient to justify a new confidentiality provision when the public-interest value - even though more limited for this particular data - must be weighed against the interest in protection.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: adopting the government's legislative proposal and rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 2 by V, C, MP.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
Vown reservationNoNo 0/21/0/3follows the planconfidence: mediumderived
SNoYes 93/0/0/14departs from the planconfidence: lowderived
MPown reservationNoNo 0/16/0/2follows the planconfidence: mediumderived
Cown reservationNoNo 0/21/0/3follows the planconfidence: lowderived
LNoYes 15/0/0/1departs from the planconfidence: mediumderived
KDNoYes 17/0/0/2departs from the planconfidence: mediumderived
MYesYes 59/0/0/9follows the planconfidence: lowderived
SDYesYes 64/0/0/9follows the planconfidence: lownot addressed

Committee proposal

Parliament adopts the government's proposal for a law on amendments to the Public Access to Information and Secrecy Act (2009:400) in the parts concerning Chapter 28, Section 4 b. Thereby Parliament approves Bill 2022/23:48 point 1 in this respect and rejects the motions 2022/23:2304 by Nooshi Dadgostar et al. (V) in this respect, 2022/23:2305 by Malin Björk et al. (C) in this respect and 2022/23:2306 by Per Bolund et al. (MP) in this respect.

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen antar regeringens förslag till lag om ändring i offentlighets- och sekretesslagen (2009:400) i de delar det avser 28 kap. 4 b §. Därmed bifaller riksdagen proposition 2022/23:48 punkt 1 i denna del och avslår motionerna 2022/23:2304 av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V) i denna del, 2022/23:2305 av Malin Björk m.fl. (C) i denna del och 2022/23:2306 av Per Bolund m.fl. (MP) i denna del.

Riksdag decision: Parliament approved the government's proposal that secrecy shall apply when the Swedish Social Insurance Agency handles matters on electricity support for electricity users. Secrecy shall apply to electricity users' personal circumstances and to information used to identify electrical facilities. If it is clear that the information can be disclosed without leading to an individual suffering harm, secrecy shall not apply. Parliament also approved the proposal to remove the Swedish Social Insurance Agency's obligation to provide information reports to the Tax Agency in matters on electricity support for electricity users. The amendments to the law come into force on 1 February 2023.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietNoNofollows the planderived

The plan makes the principle of public access and the right to scrutinize those in power one of democracy's most important cornerstones and wants welfare systems to be characterized by great clarity and transparency.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan makes the principle of public access and the right to scrutinize those in power one of democracy's most important cornerstones and wants welfare systems to be characterized by great clarity and transparency. Protecting network companies' data as trade secrets weighs light against this, especially since the plan sees the privatization of the electricity market as a problem. The plan therefore speaks for rejecting the new secrecy provision.

Original (Swedish)

Planen gör offentlighetsprincipen och rätten att granska makthavarna till en av demokratins viktigaste byggstenar och vill att välfärdssystemen präglas av stor överblick och insyn. Att skydda nätföretagens uppgifter som företagshemlighet väger lätt mot detta, särskilt eftersom planen ser elmarknadens privatisering som ett problem. Planen talar därför för att avvisa den nya sekretessbestämmelsen.

  • principle of public accessdecisive»föreningsfriheten, yttrande- och tryckfriheten, offentlighetsprincipen« (party programme ↗)“freedom of association, freedom of speech and the press, the principle of public access”
  • scrutinize those in power»delta i offentlig debatt, granska makthavarna« (party programme ↗)“participate in public debate, scrutinize those in power”
  • transparency in welfare systems»Ett generellt välfärdssystem baserat på tillit till medborgarna ger en effektiv administration samt stor överblick och insyn.« (party programme ↗)“A general welfare system based on trust in citizens provides efficient administration and great clarity and transparency.”
  • criticism of electricity market privatization»Privatiseringar har lett till dyrare elpris, att apoteken flyttar från landsbygd till städer och från fattiga till rika områden« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Privatizations have led to higher electricity prices, that pharmacies move from countryside to cities and from poor to rich areas”
SSocialdemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The plan bases administration on transparency and public access and emphasises the value of the transparency principle for exposing misconduct; it wants rather to expand than restrict access.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan bases administration on transparency and public access and emphasises the value of the transparency principle for exposing misconduct; it wants rather to expand than restrict access. Electricity support is public funds, and citizens shall be able to scrutinise how such funds are used. On this basis the plan speaks against a new secrecy provision for facility IDs, even though the plan does not directly address the question.

Original (Swedish)

Planen bygger förvaltningen på offentlighet och insyn och framhåller offentlighetsprincipens värde för att avslöja missförhållanden; den vill snarare vidga än begränsa insynen. Elstödet är offentliga medel, och medborgarna ska kunna granska hur sådana används. Utifrån detta talar planen mot en ny sekretessbestämmelse för anläggnings-id, även om planen inte behandlar frågan direkt.

  • transparency and public accessdecisive»Den demokratiska processen och samhällsförvaltningen måste bygga på offentlighet och insyn.« (party programme ↗)“The democratic process and public administration must be based on transparency and public access.”
  • the value of the transparency principle»Tack vare den svenska offentlighetsprincipen har missförhållanden inom den offentliga välfärden upptäckts och debatterats.« (party programme ↗)“Thanks to the Swedish transparency principle, misconduct in public welfare has been discovered and debated.”
  • expand the transparency principle»Samhället ska ha full insyn i alla skolor genom offentlighetsprincipen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Society shall have full access to all schools through the transparency principle.”
  • scrutiny of tax funds»Oavsett i vilken form skattefinansierad verksamhet drivs ska medborgarna ha möjlighet att granska den och utkräva politiskt ansvar.« (party programme ↗)“Regardless of what form tax-funded activities are conducted in, citizens shall have the opportunity to scrutinise them and hold politicians accountable.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MPMiljöpartietNoNofollows the planderived

The party programme asserts that the public access principle and the right to publish information on matters of public interest must be valued and strengthened and that common concerns shall be handled with openness and transparency.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The party programme asserts that the public access principle and the right to publish information on matters of public interest must be valued and strengthened and that common concerns shall be handled with openness and transparency. Introducing a new confidentiality provision to protect network companies' customer registers restricts that transparency on weak grounds. The plan therefore speaks for the counter-proposal's objection to confidentiality for facility ID.

Original (Swedish)

Partiprogrammet slår fast att offentlighetsprincipen och meddelarfriheten måste värnas och stärkas och att gemensamma angelägenheter ska hanteras med öppenhet och insyn. Att införa en ny sekretessbestämmelse till skydd för nätföretagens kundregister inskränker den insynen på svagt underlag. Planen talar därför för motförslagets invändning mot sekretess för anläggnings-id.

  • value the public access principledecisive»Offentlighetsprincipen och meddelarfriheten måste« (party programme ↗)“The public access principle and the right to publish must”
  • openness in public decisions»Våra gemensamma angelägenheter ska hanteras med öppenhet« (party programme ↗)“Our common concerns shall be handled with openness”
  • transparency in agency administration»Detta kräver transparens och« (party programme ↗)“This requires transparency and”
CCenterpartietNoNofollows the planderived

The plan makes openness and transparency fundamental prerequisites for freedom and democracy and wants Sweden to become even more transparent, with the constitutionally protected freedoms of the press and of expression as self-evident.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan makes openness and transparency fundamental prerequisites for freedom and democracy and wants Sweden to become even more transparent, with the constitutionally protected freedoms of the press and of expression as self-evident. Here secrecy protects business information, not individuals' privacy, and the grounds are, according to the counter-proposal, weakly substantiated. The plan's openness principle therefore speaks to rejecting the new secrecy provision.

Original (Swedish)

Planen gör öppenhet och transparens till grundförutsättningar för frihet och demokrati och vill att Sverige blir ännu mer transparent, med de grundlagsskyddade tryck- och meddelarfriheterna som självklara. Här skyddar sekretessen företagsuppgifter, inte enskildas integritet, och skälen är enligt motförslaget svagt underbyggda. Planens öppenhetsprincip talar därför för att avvisa den nya sekretessbestämmelsen.

  • openness and transparencydecisive»Öppenhet och transparens är grundförutsättningar för frihet, demokrati och för att förhindra korruption och övergrepp.« (party programme ↗)“Openness and transparency are fundamental prerequisites for freedom, democracy and for preventing corruption and abuse of power.”
  • more transparent Sweden»Sverige ska bli ännu mer transparent.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden shall become even more transparent.”
  • press and freedom to inform»För oss är de grundlagsskyddade fri- och rättigheterna, som exempelvis yttrande-, tryck- och meddelarfrihet, självklara och ska garanteras.« (party programme ↗)“For us, the constitutionally protected rights and freedoms, such as freedom of expression, press freedom and freedom to inform, are self-evident and shall be guaranteed.”

Worldstate weighed in: Electricity support as a crisis measure during extreme electricity prices — The plan never anticipated a mass case with electricity consumption data, so the weighing must be made based on the openness principle

LLiberalernaNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The plan states that the principle of public access has fundamental importance for democracy and is a prerequisite for scrutiny and debate, and wants public records to be made accessible to a greater extent.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan states that the principle of public access has fundamental importance for democracy and is a prerequisite for scrutiny and debate, and wants public records to be made accessible to a greater extent. Introducing a new secrecy rule for facility id on a document that has been questioned works against that line. The plan's protection for companies' property and fair competition speaks in the other direction, but does not outweigh the public interest here.

Original (Swedish)

Planen slår fast att offentlighetsprincipen har grundläggande betydelse för folkstyret och är en förutsättning för granskning och debatt, och vill att allmänna handlingar i större utsträckning görs tillgängliga. Att införa en ny sekretessregel för anläggnings-id på ett underlag som ifrågasatts går emot den linjen. Planens skydd för företagens egendom och konkurrens på lika villkor talar åt andra hållet, men väger inte över offentlighetsintresset här.

  • public access underpins democracydecisive»Offentlighetsprincipen har en grundläggande betydelse för att förankra och fördjupa folkstyret« (party programme ↗)“The principle of public access has fundamental importance for anchoring and deepening democracy”
  • more transparency in documents»Diarier och allmänna handlingar bör i större utsträckning göras« (party programme ↗)“Records and public documents should be made accessible to a greater extent”
  • scrutiny as democracy's lifeblood»Demokratins livsluft är att fler granskar, diskuterar och pekar ut samhällets brister.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Democracy's lifeblood is that more people scrutinize, discuss and point out the deficiencies of society.”
  • protection for companies' property»Lagar och regler ska slå vakt om äganderätt« (party programme ↗)“Laws and regulations shall protect property rights”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

KDKristdemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The counter-proposal opposes a new confidentiality provision for facility ID in electricity support matters.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The counter-proposal opposes a new confidentiality provision for facility ID in electricity support matters. The party programme establishes that the public principle is central to an open democracy, that the option of confidentiality should be used restrictively and that decision processes should be transparent so that accountability can be upheld. The plan therefore speaks against new confidentiality, although it also requires the state to protect companies' legitimate interests on the market.

Original (Swedish)

Motförslaget motsätter sig en ny sekretessbestämmelse för anläggnings-id i elstödsärenden. Principprogrammet slår fast att offentlighetsprincipen är central för en öppen demokrati, att sekretessmöjligheten ska nyttjas restriktivt och att beslutsprocesser ska vara överblickbara så att ansvar kan utkrävas. Planen talar därför mot ny sekretess, även om den också ålägger staten att värna företagens legitima intressen på marknaden.

  • restrictive confidentialitydecisive»Sekretessmöjligheten ska nyttjas restriktivt.« (party programme ↗)“Confidentiality should be used restrictively.”
  • the public principle»allmänna handlingar, är central för en öppen och vital« (party programme ↗)“public records, is central to an open and vital”
  • transparency and accountability»Beslutsprocessen måste vara överblickbar för medborgarna och därmed ge möjlighet att utkräva ansvar.« (party programme ↗)“The decision process must be transparent to citizens and thus provide the possibility of demanding accountability.”
  • protection for serious companies»Statens roll i näringspolitiken är att övervaka att« (party programme ↗)“The state's role in business policy is to oversee that”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MModeraternaYesYesfollows the planderived

The plan states that the rule of law shall be there with full force when business people are subject to crime and wants to strengthen protection for companies against attacks and theft attempts, at the same time as households shall be protected against winter electricity bills.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan states that the rule of law shall be there with full force when business people are subject to crime and wants to strengthen protection for companies against attacks and theft attempts, at the same time as households shall be protected against winter electricity bills. Making compilations resembling grid companies' customer registers available to outsiders would expose companies to disreputable actors. The plan values scrutiny of exercise of public power at the same time, but that does not outweigh here; the requirement is rejected.

Original (Swedish)

Planen slår fast att rättsstaten ska finnas där med full kraft när företagare utsätts för brott och vill stärka skyddet för företag mot angrepp och stöldförsök, samtidigt som hushållen ska skyddas mot vinterns elräkningar. Att göra sammanställningar som liknar nätföretagens kundregister tillgängliga för utomstående skulle utsätta företagen för oseriösa aktörer. Planen värnar samtidigt granskning av offentlig maktutövning, men det väger inte över här; kravet avvisas.

  • protection for business peopledecisive»Det är ett grundläggande politiskt ansvar att rättsstaten finns där med sin fulla kraft när företagare blir utsatta för brott.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It is a fundamental political responsibility that the rule of law is there with full force when business people are subjected to crime.”
  • protection for sensitive business information»Ge företag som är engagerade i säkerhetskänslig verksamhet bättre stöd från staten att kunna möta cyberattacker, spionage och stöldförsök från främmande makt« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Give companies engaged in security-sensitive activities better support from the state to be able to meet cyberattacks, espionage and theft attempts from foreign powers”
  • electricity support for households»Skydda hushållen mot vinterns elräkningar genom ett högkostnadsskydd« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Protect households against winter electricity bills through a high-cost protection”
  • scrutiny of public power»Den är lagstyrd, professionell och underkastad konstitutionell, politisk« (party programme ↗)“It is law-regulated, professional and subject to constitutional, political”

flags: motstridiga_atagande_insyn

SDSverigedemokraternaYesYesfollows the plannot addressed

The plan does not address confidentiality for facility IDs in electricity support matters.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan does not address confidentiality for facility IDs in electricity support matters. The nearest applicable principle is the plan's protection of ownership rights and for companies against being affected by disreputable actors and crime, which speaks for information that in practice constitutes trade secrets being protected. The counter-proposal's requirement for insight into precisely this information lacks support in the plan, which instead links the transparency requirement to results of public investments.

Original (Swedish)

Planen tar inte upp sekretess för anläggnings-id i elstödsärenden. Närmast liggande princip är planens skydd för äganderätten och för företag mot att drabbas av oseriösa aktörer och brottslighet, vilket talar för att uppgifter som i praktiken utgör företagshemligheter skyddas. Motförslagets krav på insyn i just dessa uppgifter saknar stöd i planen, som i stället kopplar insynskravet till resultat av offentliga satsningar.

  • protection of ownership rightsdecisive»Förstärka grundlagens rättighetsskydd vad gäller yttrandefrihet, äganderätt och frihet från religion« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strengthen the Basic Law's protection of rights regarding freedom of speech, ownership rights and freedom of religion”
  • protect companies against disreputable actors»Bekämpa brottslighet som drabbar företagare« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Combat crime that affects entrepreneurs”
  • counter fraud»Både fusk och sådana system som tenderar att locka till fusk och korruption ska motverkas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Both fraud and systems that tend to encourage fraud and corruption shall be countered.”

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament