2026-03-182025/26:NU14 · p.1NUBusiness & energy
General business promotion
Strategy and support for startup and scale-up companies
What's at stake: The decision affects the ability of startup and scale-up companies to connect with capital and expertise, particularly for firms outside the big cities or without established networks. It also concerns how much of the value created by Swedish innovation stays in Sweden through commercialisation here rather than abroad.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether a dedicated, coherent strategy and an independent organisation for startup and scale-up companies should be established, with strengthened support for existing incubators, or whether the current general work on simplifying rules and promoting business is sufficient.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee stresses that a good business climate with simple, fast permit processes and reduced administrative burden is the basic precondition for more jobs and growth, pointing among other things to the government's continued work on simplifying rules and the further development of the verksamt.se website. Since a corresponding proposal for a dedicated startup and scale-up strategy was already considered and rejected in spring 2025, the committee primarily refers to the positions taken then and rejects the motions.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 3 (C)
C believes startup and scale-up companies need an independent organisation and a coherent strategy, and that existing incubators must receive support now - especially those far from big cities or serving groups without access to capital and contacts. The party wants a dynamic system for demonstrating and scaling up new ideas, stronger dialogue between research institutions, authorities and entrepreneurs, increased research funding from both business and the public sector, and stronger research institutes and incubators, so that more of the value from Swedish innovation stays in Sweden.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 3 by C.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Abstain 0/0/15/7 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| S | No | Abstain 0/0/93/13 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| MP | No | Abstain 0/0/16/2 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| C | No | No 0/21/0/3 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| L | No | Yes 10/0/0/6 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| KD | No | Yes 17/0/0/2 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| M | Yes | Yes 60/0/0/8 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| SD | Yes | Yes 62/0/0/9 | follows the plan | confidence: low | derived |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2025/26:59 by Josef Fransson (SD), 2025/26:128 by Rashid Farivar (SD), 2025/26:588 by Jessica Stegrud (SD) amendments 1 and 2, 2025/26:731 by Lili André (KD), 2025/26:1276 by Josefin Malmqvist et al. (M) amendment 6, 2025/26:2181 by Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M), 2025/26:2796 by Mathias Tegnér (S) amendments 3, 9 and 10, 2025/26:2831 by Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist et al. (C) amendments 1-3 and 6, 2025/26:3282 by Katarina Luhr et al. (MP) amendments 2, 6, 15, 16, 21 and 26, 2025/26:3299 by Gustaf Göthberg and Helena Storckenfeldt (both M), 2025/26:3300 by Gustaf Göthberg and Helena Storckenfeldt (both M) amendment 1, 2025/26:3315 by Janine Alm Ericson (MP), 2025/26:3422 by Katarina Luhr et al. (MP) amendments 32, 33, 90 and 94, 2025/26:3440 by Håkan Svenneling et al. (V) amendment 26, 2025/26:3582 by Rickard Nordin et al. (C) amendment 74, 2025/26:3593 by Fredrik Olovsson et al. (S) amendments 2 in this respect, 4, 7, 11, 12, 17, 18, 43 and 44, 2025/26:3667 by Magnus Berntsson (KD) and 2025/26:3798 by Helena Gellerman (L).
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2025/26:59 av Josef Fransson (SD), 2025/26:128 av Rashid Farivar (SD), 2025/26:588 av Jessica Stegrud (SD) yrkandena 1 och 2, 2025/26:731 av Lili André (KD), 2025/26:1276 av Josefin Malmqvist m.fl. (M) yrkande 6, 2025/26:2181 av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M), 2025/26:2796 av Mathias Tegnér (S) yrkandena 3, 9 och 10, 2025/26:2831 av Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist m.fl. (C) yrkandena 1-3 och 6, 2025/26:3282 av Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP) yrkandena 2, 6, 15, 16, 21 och 26, 2025/26:3299 av Gustaf Göthberg och Helena Storckenfeldt (båda M), 2025/26:3300 av Gustaf Göthberg och Helena Storckenfeldt (båda M) yrkande 1, 2025/26:3315 av Janine Alm Ericson (MP), 2025/26:3422 av Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP) yrkandena 32, 33, 90 och 94, 2025/26:3440 av Håkan Svenneling m.fl. (V) yrkande 26, 2025/26:3582 av Rickard Nordin m.fl. (C) yrkande 74, 2025/26:3593 av Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S) yrkandena 2 i denna del, 4, 7, 11, 12, 17, 18, 43 och 44, 2025/26:3667 av Magnus Berntsson (KD) och 2025/26:3798 av Helena Gellerman (L).
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag rejected 138 proposals in motions from the general motion period 2025 on business policy. The proposals address, among other things, business promotion, measures against unserious businesses, competition issues, initiatives for an equal opportunity business environment, and certain business sectors and industries. The Riksdag refers, among other things, to current policy, previous statements, and the fact that work is already underway in the areas covered by the proposals.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to establish an independent organization for startup and scaleup companies and to strengthen conditions for innovation and commercialization. (C) — Reservation 3
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan wants to see major collective efforts on technology development and notes that companies' own investments are insufficient, because the benefit of new knowledge does not show in returns.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to see major collective efforts on technology development and notes that companies' own investments are insufficient, because the benefit of new knowledge does not show in returns. It also wants to see good conditions for small businesses in competition with large corporations and jobs throughout the country. Support for incubators outside major cities and increased research funding are thus in line with the plan, while growth rhetoric in itself does not.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill se stora gemensamma satsningar på teknikutveckling och konstaterar att företagens egna investeringar inte räcker, eftersom nyttan av ny kunskap inte syns i avkastningen. Den vill också se goda villkor för mindre företag i konkurrens med storbolagen och jobb i hela landet. Stöd till inkubatorer utanför storstäderna och ökad forskningsfinansiering ligger därmed i linje med planen, medan tillväxtretoriken i sig inte gör det.
- collective efforts on technology developmentdecisive»Vi vill se stora gemensamma satsningar på den teknikutveckling« (party programme ↗)“We want to see major collective efforts on technology development”
- the market underinvests in knowledge»Företagens investeringar i det räcker inte, vilket i grunden« (party programme ↗)“Companies' investments in that are insufficient, which at its core”
- small businesses against large corporations»Du som arbetar hårt inom ditt eget småföretag, i konkurrens med storbolag.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“You who work hard in your own small business, in competition with large corporations.”
- jobs throughout the country»det kommer också skapa väldigt många nya jobb över hela landet genom infrastruktursatsningar på järnväg, vägar, energi, bostäder och välfärd« (2022 manifesto ↗)“it will also create very many new jobs throughout the country through infrastructure investments in railways, roads, energy, housing and welfare”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan wants to strengthen the long-term conditions for entrepreneurship and innovation and invest in green technology, digitalisation and education, which supports the counter-proposal's demand for a coherent strategy for high-growth companies and support for incubators.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to strengthen the long-term conditions for entrepreneurship and innovation and invest in green technology, digitalisation and education, which supports the counter-proposal's demand for a coherent strategy for high-growth companies and support for incubators. The plan also requires cooperation between research, business and society as well as conditions for entrepreneurship in all places, which addresses the demand for support outside major cities. No special organisation for high-growth companies is mentioned.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill stärka de långsiktiga förutsättningarna för företagande och innovation och satsa på grön teknik, digitalisering och utbildning, vilket bär motförslagets krav på en sammanhållen strategi för snabbväxande företag och stöd till inkubatorer. Planen kräver också samverkan mellan forskning, näringsliv och samhälle samt förutsättningar för företagande på alla orter, vilket träffar kravet på stöd även utanför storstäderna. Någon särskild organisation för snabbväxande företag nämns inte.
- long-term conditions for entrepreneurshipdecisive»Stärk de långsiktiga förutsättningarna för företagande och innovation.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strengthen the long-term conditions for entrepreneurship and innovation.”
- research meets business»Samverkan mellan forskning, näringsliv och samhälle.« (party programme ↗)“Cooperation between research, business and society.”
- entrepreneurship throughout the country»Stärkta förutsättningar för företagande på alla orter.« (party programme ↗)“Strengthened conditions for entrepreneurship in all places.”
- innovative capacity and growth»Innovationskraft, gott företagsklimat och stark konkurrenskraft för ökad tillväxt.« (party programme ↗)“Innovative capacity, good business climate and strong competitiveness for increased growth.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan wants to strengthen the possibilities for people with good ideas to start and run enterprises and sees new enterprises as crucial for job creation and innovation.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to strengthen the possibilities for people with good ideas to start and run enterprises and sees new enterprises as crucial for job creation and innovation. Support for incubators and a strategy for fast-growing enterprises serve that goal. The plan further wants to strengthen universities as active collaborative partners and disseminate research results more broadly, and that activities exist across the country and not only in major cities.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill stärka möjligheterna för människor med goda idéer att starta och driva företag och ser nya företag som avgörande för jobbskapande och innovation. Stöd till inkubatorer och en strategi för snabbväxande företag tjänar det målet. Planen vill dessutom stärka universiteten som samverkande aktörer och sprida forskningsresultat bredare, samt att verksamheten finns i hela landet och inte bara i storstäderna.
- strengthened enterprisedecisive»Miljöpartiet vill stärka möjligheterna för människor med goda idéer att starta och driva« (party programme ↗)“The Green Party wants to strengthen the possibilities for people with good ideas to start and run”
- new enterprises create jobs»företag. Nya företag är avgörande för jobbskapande och innovation.« (party programme ↗)“enterprises. New enterprises are crucial for job creation and innovation.”
- collaborative educational institutions»Vi vill även stärka universiteten som aktiva och samverkande aktörer.« (party programme ↗)“We also want to strengthen universities as active and collaborative partners.”
- activities across the country»vara tillgänglig i alla län och på många orter – inte bara i storstäderna.« (party programme ↗)“be accessible in all counties and in many places – not only in major cities.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan wants state risk capital to become more efficient, more equal and reach the entire country, not least vulnerable areas, and that more women and people with foreign backgrounds be able to start businesses.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants state risk capital to become more efficient, more equal and reach the entire country, not least vulnerable areas, and that more women and people with foreign backgrounds be able to start businesses. It moreover requires investments in research and development. Support for incubators far from major cities and to groups without capital and contacts is the same thing in practice.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill att det statliga riskkapitalet blir mer effektivt, mer jämställt och når hela landet, inte minst de utsatta områdena, och att fler kvinnor och personer med utländsk bakgrund ska kunna starta företag. Den kräver också satsningar på forskning och utveckling. Stöd till inkubatorer långt från storstäderna och till grupper utan kapital och kontakter är samma sak i praktiken.
- risk capital throughout the countrydecisive»Kapitalförsörjning är avgörande för många småföretag. Vi vill att det statliga riskkapitalet blir mer effektivt och att investeraravdraget breddas och fördjupas. Därtill behöver det statliga riskkapitalet bli mer jämställt och nå hela landet, inte minst de utsatta områdena.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Capital supply is crucial for many small businesses. We want state risk capital to become more efficient and the investor deduction to be broadened and deepened. Furthermore, state risk capital needs to become more equal and reach the entire country, not least vulnerable areas.”
- broader enterprise»Vi måste också ta vara på all den drivkraft som finns i Sverige. Fler kvinnor och personer med utländsk bakgrund ska ha möjlighet att starta företag.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We must also take advantage of all the drive that exists in Sweden. More women and people with foreign backgrounds shall have the opportunity to start businesses.”
- investments in research»För att Sveriges företag även fortsättningsvis ska kunna leverera produkter, tjänster och jobb i världsklass krävs en pålitlig infrastruktur i hela landet, satsningar på forskning och utveckling och krafttag mot brott emot företag.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“For Sweden's companies to continue to be able to deliver world-class products, services and jobs, a reliable infrastructure throughout the country, investments in research and development and efforts against crime against businesses are required.”
- utilize research results»En ökad kommersialisering av forskningens resultat stärker Sveriges innovationskraft.« (party programme ↗)“Increased commercialization of research results strengthens Sweden's innovative power.”
The plan explicitly promises that a startup commission shall be appointed and wants to increase research grants and cooperation between higher education and business.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan explicitly promises that a startup commission shall be appointed and wants to increase research grants and cooperation between higher education and business. It also wants conditions for entrepreneurship to be strengthened throughout the country, not just in major cities. A coherent strategy and support to incubators for rapidly growing enterprises thus follows from these commitments.
Original (Swedish)
Planen lovar uttryckligen att en startup-kommission ska tillsättas och vill öka forskningsanslagen och samverkan mellan högskola och näringsliv. Den vill också att villkoren för företagande stärks i hela landet, inte bara i storstäderna. En sammanhållen strategi och stöd till inkubatorer för snabbväxande företag följer av dessa åtaganden.
- startup commissiondecisive»En startup-kommission ska tillsättas och skattesystemet anpassas bättre till den växande delningsekonomin.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“A startup commission shall be appointed and the tax system adapted better to the growing sharing economy.”
- cooperation between higher education and business»Det behövs goda villkor och social trygghet för doktorander och forskare, ökad samverkan« (party programme ↗)“There is a need for good conditions and social security for doctoral students and researchers, increased cooperation”
- increased research grants»Vi vill öka forskningsanslagen och både skapa bättre karriärvägar för yngre forskare och se riktade satsningar på att svenska universitet ska kunna locka hit världens främsta forskare.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to increase research grants and both create better career paths for younger researchers and see targeted efforts to enable Swedish universities to attract the world's leading researchers.”
- entrepreneurship throughout the country»Företagandet i hela Sverige hämmas när skatten kan vara fem, sex eller sju kronor högre per hundralapp i glesbygd än i Stockholm.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Entrepreneurship throughout Sweden is hampered when tax can be five, six or seven kronor higher per hundred in sparsely populated areas than in Stockholm.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan gives the state the task of promoting new business formation through a good climate for innovation and product and market development, which is precisely what incubators and demonstration systems aim at.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan gives the state the task of promoting new business formation through a good climate for innovation and product and market development, which is precisely what incubators and demonstration systems aim at. It also establishes that public bodies should contribute to making risk capital available, not least for small enterprises and in regions with weak capital formation, which entails the requirement for support to incubators far from major cities. That Sweden should be at the forefront of research investments supports the requirement for increased research financing, while the plan's rejection of direct business subsidies sets a limit.
Original (Swedish)
Planen ger staten uppgiften att främja nyföretagande genom ett gott klimat för innovationer samt produkt- och marknadsutveckling, vilket är just det inkubatorer och demonstrationssystem syftar till. Den slår också fast att offentliga organ bör medverka till att riskkapital finns tillgängligt, inte minst för mindre företag och i regioner med svag kapitalbildning, vilket bär kravet på stöd till inkubatorer långt från storstäderna. Att Sverige ska ligga i främsta ledet i satsningar på forskning stöder kravet på ökad forskningsfinansiering, medan planens avvisande av direkta företagssubventioner sätter en gräns.
- state promotion of new business formationdecisive»Staten bör främja nyföretagande genom att skapa ett gott klimat för innovationer samt« (party programme ↗)“The state should promote new business formation by creating a good climate for innovations and”
- risk capital in weak regions»riskkapital finns tillgängligt, inte minst för mindre företag och i regioner med svag« (party programme ↗)“risk capital is available, not least for smaller enterprises and in regions with weak”
- leading research investments»Sverige måste därför ligga i främsta ledet när det gäller satsningar på forskning och« (party programme ↗)“Sweden must therefore be at the forefront when it comes to investment in research and”
- no direct business subsidies»Direkta företagssubventioner avvisas.« (party programme ↗)“Direct business subsidies are rejected.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan's recipe for growing companies is simpler tax system, competitive taxes and one-third less red tape, not a new independent organisation and a state strategy for fast-growing companies.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's recipe for growing companies is simpler tax system, competitive taxes and one-third less red tape, not a new independent organisation and a state strategy for fast-growing companies. A large state is explicitly described as a weaker society. The plan also wants to protect free research from political interference, which argues against steered research funding.
Original (Swedish)
Planens recept för växande företag är enklare skattesystem, konkurrenskraftiga skatter och en tredjedel mindre regelkrångel, inte en ny oberoende organisation och en statlig strategi för snabbväxande företag. En stor stat beskrivs uttryckligen som ett svagare samhälle. Planen vill dessutom värna den fria forskningen från politiska pekpinnar, vilket talar mot styrd forskningsfinansiering.
- good conditions for growing companiesdecisive»Villkoren för att starta, växa och expandera behöver vara goda för att fler ska våga lämna trygga och välbetalda jobb för att starta företag.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Conditions for starting, growing and expanding need to be good so that more dare leave secure and well-paid jobs to start companies.”
- reduced red tape»Ta bort en tredjedel av företagens administrationskostnader och en tredjedel av regelkrånglet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Remove one-third of companies' administrative costs and one-third of red tape”
- limited state apparatus»En stor stat leder till ett svagare samhälle.« (party programme ↗)“A large state leads to a weaker society.”
- free research»Värna den fria forskningen från politiska pekpinnar« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Protect free research from political interference”
The counter-proposal wants to establish a new independent organization and a coherent strategy for fast-growing companies and increase public research funding.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The counter-proposal wants to establish a new independent organization and a coherent strategy for fast-growing companies and increase public research funding. The plan's path to more and growing companies is instead regulatory simplification, lower costs and fewer agencies, and it requires clear citizen benefit for every public investment. The plan does, however, share the ambition to stimulate entrepreneurship, which makes the conclusion uncertain.
Original (Swedish)
Motförslaget vill inrätta en ny oberoende organisation och en sammanhållen strategi för snabbväxande företag samt öka offentlig forskningsfinansiering. Planens väg till fler och växande företag är i stället regelförenkling, lägre kostnader och färre myndigheter, och den kräver tydlig medborgarnytta för varje offentlig satsning. Planen delar däremot ambitionen att stimulera nyföretagande, vilket gör slutsatsen osäker.
- fewer agenciesdecisive»Stoppa slöseriet inom myndigheterna och slå samman myndigheter« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Stop the waste within the authorities and merge agencies”
- regulatory simplification as main tool»Verka för regelförenkling och avlasta småföretagens administrativa börda« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Work for regulatory simplification and ease small businesses' administrative burden”
- clear citizen benefit required»Sverigedemokraterna vill koncentrera de offentliga utgifterna till välfärdens hjärta och begära tydlig medborgarnytta för alla satsningar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Sweden Democrats want to concentrate public expenditure on the heart of welfare and require clear citizen benefit for all investments.”
- stimulate entrepreneurship»Skapa förutsättningar för nyföretagande och entreprenörskap« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Create conditions for entrepreneurship and enterprise”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2025/26:NU14)
- Committee report full text (HD01NU14)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2025/26:1 — Kommission mot brott mot företag samt företag som brottsverktyg av Josef Fransson (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:1025 — En nyanserad bild av invandring av Jamal El-Haj (-)
- Motion 2025/26:1077 — En nationell dataspelspolitik för kultur och innovation av Sofia Skönnbrink m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1122 — Stöd till affärsutveckling för kulturella och kreativa branscher, särskilt spelindustrin av Anne-Li Sjölund (C)
- Motion 2025/26:1166 — Destinationsutveckling av östra Skåne av Adrian Magnusson m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1175 — Nationell samordnare för dataspelsbranschen av Mona Smedman (C)
- Motion 2025/26:1245 — Turistavgift av Anna-Caren Sätherberg och Hanna Westerén (båda S)
- Motion 2025/26:1276 — Reformer för ökad tillväxt i Stockholmsregionen av Josefin Malmqvist m.fl. (M)
- Motion 2025/26:128 — Inrättande av en chief technology officer för Sverige av Rashid Farivar (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:1320 — Utvärdering av bryggerilånens påverkan på krogmarknaden och småbryggeriernas möjligheter av Petter Löberg och Joakim Järrebring (båda S)
- Motion 2025/26:1387 — Stärkta förutsättningar för kooperativt företagande av Karin Sundin m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1417 — Statligt ansvar vid industrietableringar av Åsa Karlsson (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1447 — Bättre förutsättningar för en modern industri av Ida Karkiainen m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1448 — Stärkt entreprenörskap i hela landet av Johan Büser (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1925 — Svenska trähus för Ukrainas återuppbyggnad av Jan Ericson (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1941 — Stopp för kriminaliteten inom offentlig upphandling av Mattias Jonsson och Amalia Rud Stenlöf (båda S)
- Motion 2025/26:2095 — Regelbunden översyn av svensk konkurrenskraft av Sten Bergheden (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2181 — Forskning, innovation och teknikutveckling inom safetech och blåljusverksamhet av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2236 — Ökad turism av Sten Bergheden (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2358 — Svensk och europeisk trä- och möbelindustri av Sten Bergheden (M)
Source: The Swedish Parliament