2023-04-122022/23:UU6 · p.3UUForeign affairs
Priorities
Priorities and underlying principles for Swedish development aid
What's at stake: The question concerns which values should guide Swedish aid - poverty reduction, human rights and the role of civil society, or a clearer focus on paid work and control of aid funds. It affects people in recipient countries and how Swedish aid funds are used and monitored.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
Whether aid policy priorities should be governed by the committee's current rights- and poverty-based approach, or whether a clearer focus on self-sufficiency, strict control of aid funds, and support for democratic institutions should be added.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee maintains that poverty remains widespread and that Sweden should pursue an ambitious and generous aid policy permeated by a rights-based perspective and the perspective of people living in poverty, with particular weight on human rights, democracy, the rule of law, gender equality and a child-rights perspective; it highlights civil-society organizations as a key force in poverty reduction and democratic development, and points to the government's joint commitments with civil society.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 6 (S)
The reserving party wants Swedish aid to focus on enabling people to lift themselves out of poverty through paid work and self-sufficiency, with requirements for living wages and decent working conditions, while also demanding clear conditions on how aid is used, controlling it through risk analysis and audits, and actively supporting democratic governance, free political parties, trade unions and a free press.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 6 by S.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have held
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: KDKristdemokraterna, LLiberalerna
Ja 153–92Ja 123–122
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | Yes | Abstain 0/0/21/3 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| S | No | No 0/92/0/15 | match | confidence: medium | derived |
| MP | No | Abstain 0/0/15/3 | differs | confidence: low | derived |
| C | No | Abstain 0/0/21/3 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| L | No | Yes 14/0/0/2 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| KD | No | Yes 16/0/0/3 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: medium | explicit |
| M | No | Yes 59/0/0/9 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| SD | No | Yes 64/0/0/9 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
Committee proposal
Parliament rejects the motions 2022/23:53 by Lotta Johnsson Fornarve et al. (V) proposal 21, 2022/23:612 by Nooshi Dadgostar et al. (V) proposal 16, 2022/23:1455 by Jacob Risberg and Bassem Nasr (both MP) proposal 5, 2022/23:1462 by Amanda Lind et al. (MP) proposals 3 and 4, 2022/23:1745 by Alexander Christiansson et al. (SD) proposal 14, 2022/23:1749 by Mats Nordberg et al. (SD) proposals 1-3, 9, 10, 14, 15, 17-30 and 44, 2022/23:1752 by Markus Wiechel et al. (SD) proposals 1 and 12, 2022/23:1758 by Markus Wiechel et al. (SD) proposals 6, 7 and 9, 2022/23:1783 by Aron Emilsson et al. (SD) proposals 3-5, 2022/23:1879 by Kerstin Lundgren et al. (C) proposals 2-4, 6, 10, 12-20, 24, 26, 27 and 30-32, 2022/23:2042 by Morgan Johansson et al. (S) proposal 2, 2022/23:2064 by Fredrik Olovsson et al. (S) proposal 19, 2022/23:2190 by Annie Lööf et al. (C) proposals 17-21, 2022/23:2261 by Janine Alm Ericson et al. (MP) proposals 2-4, 7, 9-12, 15, 17-19, 24 and 25 as well as 2022/23:2277 by Märta Stenevi et al. (MP) proposal 65.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2022/23:53 av Lotta Johnsson Fornarve m.fl. (V) yrkande 21, 2022/23:612 av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V) yrkande 16, 2022/23:1455 av Jacob Risberg och Bassem Nasr (båda MP) yrkande 5, 2022/23:1462 av Amanda Lind m.fl. (MP) yrkandena 3 och 4, 2022/23:1745 av Alexander Christiansson m.fl. (SD) yrkande 14, 2022/23:1749 av Mats Nordberg m.fl. (SD) yrkandena 1-3, 9, 10, 14, 15, 17-30 och 44, 2022/23:1752 av Markus Wiechel m.fl. (SD) yrkandena 1 och 12, 2022/23:1758 av Markus Wiechel m.fl. (SD) yrkandena 6, 7 och 9, 2022/23:1783 av Aron Emilsson m.fl. (SD) yrkandena 3-5, 2022/23:1879 av Kerstin Lundgren m.fl. (C) yrkandena 2-4, 6, 10, 12-20, 24, 26, 27 och 30-32, 2022/23:2042 av Morgan Johansson m.fl. (S) yrkande 2, 2022/23:2064 av Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S) yrkande 19, 2022/23:2190 av Annie Lööf m.fl. (C) yrkandena 17-21, 2022/23:2261 av Janine Alm Ericson m.fl. (MP) yrkandena 2-4, 7, 9-12, 15, 17-19, 24 och 25 samt 2022/23:2277 av Märta Stenevi m.fl. (MP) yrkande 65.
Riksdag decision: Parliament voted against approximately 100 proposals concerning international assistance. The proposals were submitted during the regular motion period of 2022. The motions address, among other things, the level of assistance, the OECD's development aid committee's regulations and priorities in international development assistance. Parliament rejects the motions in part because investigative work within the area is ongoing.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants Sweden to maintain one percent of gross national income for international development aid and focus on humanitarian assistance and climate adaptation. (S) — Reservation 6
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan ties aid to being given without self-interested reservations and to poor countries being able to develop on their own terms.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan ties aid to being given without self-interested reservations and to poor countries being able to develop on their own terms. Making self-sufficiency and demanding control the carrying principle of aid goes against this. The plan sees poverty as a result of unequal power relations that require resource transfer from the North and a significant reduction in global inequality, even though the parts about labour rights and free press are close to the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planen binder biståndet till att ges utan egennyttiga förbehåll och till att fattiga länder ska kunna utvecklas på egna villkor. Att göra egen försörjning och kravställande kontroll till biståndets bärande princip går mot detta. Planen ser fattigdomen som en följd av ojämlika maktförhållanden som kräver resursöverföring från Nord och kraftigt minskad global ojämlikhet, även om delarna om fackliga rättigheter och fri press ligger nära planen.
- aid without self-interested conditionsdecisive»Internationellt bistånd ska ges till fattiga länder utan egennyttiga förbehåll.« (party programme ↗)“International development aid shall be given to poor countries without self-interested conditions.”
- development on own terms»Sverige ska verka för en internationell skuldavskrivning som ger fattiga länder möjlighet att utvecklas på egna villkor.« (party programme ↗)“Sweden shall work for international debt relief that gives poor countries the opportunity to develop on their own terms.”
- reduced global inequality»I en rättvis värld måste den globala ojämlikheten kraftigt minskas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“In a just world, global inequality must be significantly reduced.”
- resource transfer from the North»Nord behöver dock under överskådlig tid föra över teknik och resurser till Syd och Öst« (party programme ↗)“North needs, however, over a foreseeable time, to transfer technology and resources to South and East”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The party programme establishes that development cooperation shall be based on developing countries' own resources and support democratic institutions and a strong civil society, with active support for labour organising in poor countries and demands for fair wages and good working conditions.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme establishes that development cooperation shall be based on developing countries' own resources and support democratic institutions and a strong civil society, with active support for labour organising in poor countries and demands for fair wages and good working conditions. That is in substance what the counter-proposal demands: self-sufficiency, living wages, free labour unions and a free press. The demand for control and audit of funds is, however, not addressed in the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet slår fast att utvecklingssamarbetet ska bygga på utvecklingsländernas egna resurser och stödja demokratiska institutioner och ett starkt civilsamhälle, med aktivt stöd till facklig organisering i fattiga länder och krav på rättvisa löner och goda arbetsvillkor. Det är i sak vad motförslaget begär: egen försörjning, levnadslöner, fria fackföreningar och fri press. Kravet på kontroll och revision av medlen är däremot inte behandlat i planen.
- aid based on own resourcesdecisive»Utvecklingssamarbetet ska bygga på utvecklingsländernas egna resurser och stödja« (party programme ↗)“Development cooperation shall be based on developing countries' own resources and support”
- support for free labour unions»facklig organisering i de fattiga länderna.« (party programme ↗)“labour organising in the poor countries.”
- living wages and decent conditions»Goda arbetsvillkor, rättvisa löner och ansvar för det omkringliggande samhället är något« (party programme ↗)“Good working conditions, fair wages and responsibility for the surrounding society is something”
- poverty reduction»Arbetet för att minska fattigdomen måste fortsätta.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The work to reduce poverty must continue.”
The plan wants development cooperation to build democratic societies and counter corruption, aid to be guided by efficiency and poverty reduction, and organizations for democracy and human rights to be supported.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants development cooperation to build democratic societies and counter corruption, aid to be guided by efficiency and poverty reduction, and organizations for democracy and human rights to be supported. The counter-proposal's demands for support to democracy, free trade unions and free press and control of funds align with this. Its emphasis on self-reliance over a rights perspective makes the support weak.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill att utvecklingssamarbetet bygger upp demokratiska samhällen och motverkar korruption, att biståndet styrs av effektivitet och fattigdomsbekämpning och att organisationer för demokrati och mänskliga rättigheter stöds. Motförslagets krav på stöd till demokrati, fria fackföreningar och fri press samt kontroll av medlen ligger i linje med detta. Dess betoning av eget arbete framför rättighetsperspektivet gör stödet svagt.
- democracy and anti-corruptiondecisive»att utvecklingssamarbetet ska bidra till att bekämpa fattigdom, förebygga och hantera klimatförändringarna, bevara och skapa fred, förebygga konflikter, bygga upp demokratiska samhällen och motverka korruption.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“that development cooperation shall contribute to combating poverty, preventing and managing climate change, preserving and creating peace, preventing conflicts, building democratic societies and countering corruption.”
- support to civil society»Organisationer som arbetar för demokrati, mänskliga rättigheter, jämställdhet och hållbar utveckling bör ges stöd genom svenskt utvecklingssamarbete.« (party programme ↗)“Organizations that work for democracy, human rights, equality and sustainable development should be supported through Swedish development cooperation.”
- efficiency and poverty reduction»att biståndet ska styras av principer om effektivitet och fattigdomsbekämpning och inte villkoras mot Sveriges inrikespolitiska intressen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“that aid shall be guided by principles of efficiency and poverty reduction and not be conditioned against Sweden's domestic political interests.”
- decent working conditions globally»Sverige ska ställa krav på att importerade varor är tillverkade med hänsyn till miljö, mänskliga rättigheter och arbetsförhållanden för anställda i tillverkningsländerna.« (party programme ↗)“Sweden shall require that imported goods are produced with regard to environment, human rights and working conditions for employees in the manufacturing countries.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan's overarching view is that own work and own provision are the foundation for freedom and that openness shall be combined with stricter requirements on working conditions in international agreements.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's overarching view is that own work and own provision are the foundation for freedom and that openness shall be combined with stricter requirements on working conditions in international agreements. It also commits the party to stand up for democracy, free press and freedoms and rights and to tighten work against corruption. Aid aimed at self-provision, decent conditions, control of resources and democracy support thus aligns with the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planens genomgående syn är att eget arbete och egen försörjning är grunden för frihet och att öppenhet ska kombineras med hårdare krav på arbetsvillkor i internationella avtal. Den förbinder också partiet att stå upp för demokrati, fri press och fri- och rättigheter samt att skärpa arbetet mot korruption. Ett bistånd inriktat på självförsörjning, anständiga villkor, kontroll av medlen och demokratistöd ligger därför i linje med planen.
- own provision as goaldecisive»arbeta och försörja sig själva, efter egen förmåga.« (party programme ↗)“work and support themselves, according to their own ability.”
- requirements on working conditions»Ställ hårdare krav på arbetsvillkor, miljö och klimat i handelsavtal.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Set stricter requirements on working conditions, environment and climate in trade agreements.”
- support for democracy and rights»Därför är det särskilt viktigt att vi, medborgare i de demokratiska länderna, inte kompromissar med våra ideal utan förenas i en strävan efter alla människors fri- och rättigheter.« (party programme ↗)“Therefore it is particularly important that we, citizens of the democratic countries, do not compromise on our ideals but unite in a striving for all people's freedoms and rights.”
- control and anti-corruption»Sverige ska bli ännu mer transparent. Vi vill inrätta en antikorruptionsmyndighet, skärpa regler mot korruption och införa ett lobbyregister.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden shall become even more transparent. We want to establish an anti-corruption authority, tighten rules against corruption and introduce a lobbying register.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto demands major reforms of aid with focus on democracy, gender equality and reduced corruption, and points out lack of openness as a serious problem.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto demands major reforms of aid with focus on democracy, gender equality and reduced corruption, and points out lack of openness as a serious problem. The party programme makes democracy the overarching goal for development aid and prioritizes democratizing forces and rule-of-law structures. The counter-proposal's demand for self-sufficiency, control of funds and support to parties, unions and free press thus aligns with the plan's line.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet kräver stora reformer av biståndet med fokus på demokrati, jämställdhet och minskad korruption, och pekar ut bristande öppenhet som ett allvarligt problem. Partiprogrammet gör demokrati till det övergripande målet för utvecklingsbiståndet och prioriterar demokratiserande krafter och rättsstatliga strukturer. Motförslagets krav på egen försörjning, kontroll av medlen och stöd till partier, fackföreningar och fri press ligger därför i planens linje.
- aid reform against corruptiondecisive»Den svenska biståndspolitiken måste genomgå stora reformer med fokus på demokrati, jämställdhet och minskad korruption.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Swedish aid policy must undergo major reforms with focus on democracy, gender equality and reduced corruption.”
- democracy as aid goal»Demokrati ska vara det övergripande målet för utvecklingsbiståndet.« (party programme ↗)“Democracy shall be the overarching goal for development aid.”
- support to democratic forces»Sverige ska vara en röst för global frihet och ge stöd åt de modiga människor som verkar för demokratisering« (party programme ↗)“Sweden shall be a voice for global freedom and give support to the courageous people working for democratization”
- control of aid funds»Samtidigt finns i dag allvarliga problem med bristande öppenhet och korruption med svenska biståndspengar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“At the same time there are today serious problems with lack of openness and corruption with Swedish aid money.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan establishes that people's will and ability for self-sufficiency should be utilized and that poverty reduction is about promoting growth, trade and political independence.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that people's will and ability for self-sufficiency should be utilized and that poverty reduction is about promoting growth, trade and political independence. It requires clear instruments for steering and independent evaluations of aid, and sees human rights as both an end and a means. Support for democracy, free trade unions and free press also aligns with the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att människors vilja och förmåga till egenförsörjning ska tas tillvara och att fattigdomsbekämpning handlar om att främja tillväxt, handel och politisk självständighet. Den kräver tydliga instrument för styrning och oberoende utvärderingar av biståndet, samt ser mänskliga rättigheter som både mål och medel. Stöd till demokrati, fria fackföreningar och fri press ligger också i planens linje.
- self-sufficiency as goaldecisive»Människors vilja och förmåga till egenförsörjning ska« (party programme ↗)“People's will and ability for self-sufficiency should”
- steering and monitoring of aid»Det måste finnas tydliga instrument för styrning,« (party programme ↗)“There must be clear instruments for steering,”
- rights-based aid»Mänskliga rättigheter är både ett mål och ett medel« (party programme ↗)“Human rights are both an end and a means”
- support for free trade unions»Starka och partipolitiskt oberoende fackföreningar« (party programme ↗)“Strong and politically independent trade unions”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan wants to focus aid where it does the greatest good, with tough requirements that tax funds do not disappear in corruption, and to prioritise democracy and human rights.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to focus aid where it does the greatest good, with tough requirements that tax funds do not disappear in corruption, and to prioritise democracy and human rights. The counter-proposal's direction towards self-support, clear requirements and control and support for democratic institutions and free press aligns with that, while the programme holds firm that development is primarily built by market economy and trade.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill fokusera biståndet dit det gör störst nytta, med hårda krav på att skattemedel inte försvinner i korruption, och prioritera demokrati och mänskliga rättigheter. Motförslagets inriktning på egen försörjning, tydliga krav och kontroll samt stöd till demokratiska institutioner och fri press ligger i linje med det, medan programmet håller fast vid att utveckling främst byggs av marknadsekonomi och handel.
- focused and results-based aiddecisive»Fokusera det svenska biståndet till de länder, organisationer och tematiska områden där det gör störst nytta« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Focus Swedish aid to the countries, organisations and thematic areas where it does the greatest good”
- control of aid funds»Dina skattepengar ska inte försvinna i korruption eller hamna i fickorna på odemokratiska ledare« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Your tax money shall not disappear in corruption or end up in the pockets of undemocratic leaders”
- democracy and rule of law prioritised»Prioritera insatser som stödjer arbetet för demokrati och mänskliga rättigheter« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Prioritise efforts that support work for democracy and human rights”
- development through market economy»annat på marknadsekonomi och handel.« (party programme ↗)“else on market economy and trade.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan's decisive commitment is that aid should be valued by effect, followed through to the final recipient and distributed based on concrete results, not by how much money is paid out.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's decisive commitment is that aid should be valued by effect, followed through to the final recipient and distributed based on concrete results, not by how much money is paid out. The counter-proposal's demand for self-sufficiency through one's own work, clear demands on the use of funds and control through risk analysis and audit respond to this. Support for democracy and free press also aligns with the plan's foreign policy direction.
Original (Swedish)
Planens avgörande åtagande är att biståndet ska värderas efter effekt, följas ända till slutmottagaren och fördelas utifrån konkreta resultat, inte efter hur mycket pengar som betalas ut. Motförslagets krav på självförsörjning genom eget arbete, tydliga krav på medelsanvändningen samt kontroll genom riskanalys och revision svarar mot detta. Även stödet till demokrati och fri press ligger i linje med planens utrikespolitiska inriktning.
- control and results-based managementdecisive»Men biståndsanslag måste bättre kunna följas ända till slutmottagaren och fördelas utifrån konkreta resultat utifrån i förväg fastställda mål.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“But aid appropriations must better be traced to the final recipient and distributed based on concrete results based on pre-established goals.”
- effect before appropriation level»Biståndet ska som alla andra budgetposter värderas utifrån den effekt det får och inte hur mycket pengar som läggs på området.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Aid, like all other budget items, should be evaluated based on the effect it achieves and not by how much money is spent on the area.”
- more effective aid»Effektivisera och utvärdera det svenska biståndet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Streamline and evaluate Swedish aid”
- support for democracy»Sverige ska bli en tydligare röst för demokrati, yttrandefrihet och grundläggande mänskliga fri och rättigheter i världspolitiken.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden should become a clearer voice for democracy, freedom of expression and fundamental human freedoms and rights in world politics.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2022/23:UU6)
- Committee report full text (HA01UU6)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2022/23:1112 — UNRWA av Hans Eklind (KD)
- Motion 2022/23:1188 — Internationell solidaritet - en stark röst för hbtq-plus-personers rättigheter av Anna Wallentheim m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2022/23:1225 — Biståndsbudgeten av Lotta Johnsson Fornarve m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2022/23:1366 — En ny svensk Israelpolitik av Mikael Oscarsson och Magnus Oscarsson (båda KD)
- Motion 2022/23:1455 — Fred i Palestina av Jacob Risberg och Bassem Nasr (båda MP)
- Motion 2022/23:1462 — Fler fristäder och stärkt skydd för demokratins röstbärare av Amanda Lind m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2022/23:1500 — Utvecklingsländers makt över sin egen matproduktion och handel av Azadeh Rojhan m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2022/23:172 — Upphörande av bistånd till den palestinska myndigheten av Björn Söder (SD)
- Motion 2022/23:1745 — Internationellt stöd till utsatta kristna av Alexander Christiansson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2022/23:1749 — Sverigedemokraternas biståndspolitik av Mats Nordberg m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2022/23:1752 — Demokrati och mänskliga rättigheter i utrikespolitiken av Markus Wiechel m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2022/23:1758 — Afrikas horn av Markus Wiechel m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2022/23:1761 — Fredsprocessen Israel-Palestina av Aron Emilsson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2022/23:1766 — Stöd för utsatta kvinnor i utrikespolitiken av Rasmus Giertz m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2022/23:1769 — Mellanöstern av Markus Wiechel m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2022/23:1783 — Vissa internationella militära insatser av Aron Emilsson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2022/23:1810 — Bistånd via ideella föreningar av Magnus Jacobsson (KD)
- Motion 2022/23:1879 — En fokuserad utvecklingsagenda bortom 2030 av Kerstin Lundgren m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2022/23:2042 — Utgiftsområde 7 Internationellt bistånd av Morgan Johansson m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2022/23:2064 — Handel och exportfrämjande av Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S)
Source: The Swedish Parliament