2023-05-112022/23:KrU7 · p.5KrUCulture
Regulation of Political Parties' Lotteries
Political parties' lotteries and the exemption for public-benefit purposes
What's at stake: Lottery revenue for public-benefit purposes currently also gives political parties tens of millions of kronor a year, on top of public party funding. The issue is where the line for what counts as public benefit should be drawn, and who should be allowed to fund their activities with lottery proceeds.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the government should act to exclude political parties, and associations or companies owned by them, from the exemption in the Gaming Act that lets public-benefit purposes run lottery activities, or whether the current rules should remain pending a broader review.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
A review of the exemption rules for public-benefit lotteries has already been announced. The committee considers that such a review risks affecting the financing options of civil society, the sports movement, and political organizations, and that it should therefore be carried out with broad political backing rather than through a separate call to act now. The motion is accordingly rejected.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 7 (SD)
The reservation (SD) argues that political parties, and associations or companies owned by them, should not count as public-benefit purposes under the Gaming Act. Lottery revenue for such purposes currently gives the parties tens of millions of kronor a year, even though parties already have secure income through public party funding and membership fees. The government should therefore work to exclude political parties and party-owned associations and companies from the exemption.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 7 by SD.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | Yes | Abstain 0/0/21/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| S | Yes | Yes 48/0/42/17 | follows the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| MP | No | Yes 7/0/7/4 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| C | No | Yes 20/0/0/4 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| L | No | Yes 13/0/1/2 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| KD | No | Yes 16/0/0/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | derived |
| M | Yes | Yes 56/0/0/12 | follows the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| SD | No | No 0/62/0/10 | follows the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
Broke with the party line
| SAida Birinxhiku (S, Hallands län) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
| SAnna Vikström (S, Stockholms län) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
| SAnna Wallentheim (S, Skåne läns norra och östra) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
| SAnna-Belle Strömberg (S, Västernorrlands län) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
| SAnna-Caren Sätherberg (S, Jämtlands län) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
| SAnnika Strandhäll (S, Stockholms kommun) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
| SDenis Begic (S, Örebro län) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
| SEwa Pihl Krabbe (S, Skåne läns norra och östra) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
| SFredrik Lundh Sammeli (S, Norrbottens län) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
| SFredrik Stenberg (S, Västerbottens län) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
| SHelén Pettersson (S, Västerbottens län) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
| SIda Karkiainen (S, Norrbottens län) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
| SIsak From (S, Västerbottens län) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
| SJennie Nilsson (S, Hallands län) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
| SJim Svensk Larm (S, Gävleborgs län) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
| SKalle Olsson (S, Jämtlands län) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
| SKarin Sundin (S, Örebro län) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
| SKristoffer Lindberg (S, Gävleborgs län) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
| SLars Mejern Larsson (S, Värmlands län) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
| SLena Johansson (S, Västmanlands län) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
| SLinus Sköld (S, Norrbottens län) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
| SLouise Thunström (S, Västra Götalands läns norra) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
| SMalin Larsson (S, Västernorrlands län) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
| SMarkus Kallifatides (S, Stockholms kommun) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
| SMarkus Selin (S, Stockholms län) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
| SMathias Tegnér (S, Stockholms län) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
| SMatilda Ernkrans (S, Örebro län) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
| SMats Wiking (S, Västra Götalands läns norra) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
| SMikael Dahlqvist (S, Värmlands län) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
| SMirja Räihä (S, Stockholms kommun) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
| SMonica Haider (S, Kronobergs län) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
| SNiklas Karlsson (S, Skåne läns västra) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
| SPeder Björk (S, Västernorrlands län) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
| SPer-Arne Håkansson (S, Skåne läns norra och östra) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
| SPeter Hedberg (S, Västernorrlands län) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
| SSerkan Köse (S, Stockholms län) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
| SSofie Eriksson (S, Dalarnas län) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
| STomas Eneroth (S, Kronobergs län) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
| SZara Leghissa (S, Norrbottens län) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
| SZinaida Kajevic (S, Malmö kommun) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
| SÅsa Eriksson (S, Västmanlands län) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
| SÅsa Karlsson (S, Västerbottens län) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
| MPAnnika Hirvonen (MP, Stockholms län) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
| MPCamilla Hansén (MP, Örebro län) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
| MPEmma Berginger (MP, Skåne läns södra) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
| MPJan Riise (MP, Hallands län) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
| MPKatarina Luhr (MP, Stockholms kommun) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
| MPMärta Stenevi (MP, Stockholms län) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
| MPRebecka Le Moine (MP, Östergötlands län) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
| LCarl B Hamilton (L, Stockholms kommun) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
MPs whose vote differs from their party's majority position in this division. Marked with a dark ring in the chamber view.
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects motion 2022/23:1142 by Jonas Andersson et al. (SD) item 9.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motion 2022/23:1142 av Jonas Andersson m.fl. (SD) yrkande 9.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag said yes to the government's proposal for measures to ensure a sound and safe gaming market. The measures proposed by the government include among others opportunities to involve payment service providers to block bets and payment of winnings to and from gaming companies that lack a license opportunity for the Gambling Inspectorate to purchase gambling services under a false identity as part of the supervision of the gaming companies opportunities to store and forward personal data to prevent so-called match-fixing, that is when a sporting event has been manipulated in connection with betting obligations for gaming companies to on request hand over information to the Police Agency that is needed to investigate crimes related to gambling. The measures involve amendments to the Gaming Act that come into force on 1 July 2023. At the same time, the Riksdag said no to approximately 50 proposals in motions on gaming matters from the general motion period 2022. Among other things, the Riksdag refers to previous positions and to the government proposal described above.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants the government to return with measures to strengthen consumer protection regarding lottery and casino-like elements in video games. (SD) — Reservation 7
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan says nothing about lottery permits or party financing.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan says nothing about lottery permits or party financing. The closest principle is that the party values strong and independent popular movements and explicitly opposes organizations' independence being restricted through government regulations or subsidy systems that direct their activities. Excluding parties and party-owned associations from the exemption for public benefit purposes would be such a restriction of organized popular movement work's self-financing, so the plan speaks against the demand rather than for it.
Original (Swedish)
Planen säger ingenting om lotteritillstånd eller partiers finansiering. Närmast liggande princip är att partiet värnar starka och självständiga folkrörelser och uttryckligen motsätter sig att organisationers självständighet inskränks genom statliga regleringar eller bidragssystem som styr deras verksamhet. Att utesluta partier och partiägda föreningar från undantaget för allmännyttiga ändamål vore en sådan inskränkning av det organiserade folkrörelsearbetets egenfinansiering, varför planen närmast talar emot kravet.
- value independent popular movementsdecisive»starka och självständiga folkrörelser som kan bidra till progressiva« (party programme ↗)“strong and independent popular movements that can contribute to progressive”
- organizations' independence»Vi värnar kvinno- och tjejjourernas självständighet.« (party programme ↗)“We value women's and girls' hotlines' independence.”
- no directive subsidy conditions»inskränkas genom till exempel statliga regleringar eller bidragssystem som innebär att jourerna inte själva får prioritera sin verksamhet.« (party programme ↗)“restricted through for example government regulations or subsidy systems that mean the hotlines cannot themselves prioritize their activities.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan does not address lotteries as a financing source for parties.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan does not address lotteries as a financing source for parties. The closest principles are that a strong and living civil society is the foundation of democracy and that popular movements and public education sustain democracy, which speaks against curtailing civil movements' and parties' own financing. The plan's demands in the parties' area concern open reporting of external contributions, not restricted self-financing. The conclusion is therefore derived and uncertain.
Original (Swedish)
Planen behandlar inte lotterier som finansieringskälla för partier. Närmast liggande principer är att ett starkt och levande civilsamhälle är demokratins underbyggnad och att folkrörelser och folkbildning bär demokratin, vilket talar mot att beskära folkrörelsers och partiers egen finansiering. Planens krav på partiernas område gäller öppen redovisning av externa bidrag, inte begränsad egenfinansiering. Slutsatsen är därför härledd och osäker.
- strong civil societydecisive»Ett starkt och levande civilsamhälle är demokratins underbyggnad.« (party programme ↗)“A strong and living civil society is the foundation of democracy.”
- open party financing»Partierna ska vara skyldiga att öppet redovisa de bidrag de erhåller från utomstående« (party programme ↗)“Parties shall be obligated to openly disclose the contributions they receive from outside sources”
- popular movements sustain democracy»Folkbildning ger stark demokrati och möjligheter till personlig utveckling vid sidan av den formella utbildningen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Public education provides strong democracy and opportunities for personal development alongside formal education.”
The party programme states that all forms of corruption must be combated, not least within the political sphere, and demands transparency about party financing through a law requiring disclosure of donors.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme states that all forms of corruption must be combated, not least within the political sphere, and demands transparency about party financing through a law requiring disclosure of donors. The fact that political parties and party-owned companies should not be counted as public-interest organizations when awarding lottery licenses aligns with that transparency and clean governance principle, reinforced by the programme's restrictive stance on gambling. The plan does not address lottery licenses, so the position is derived.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet slår fast att alla former av korruption måste motarbetas, inte minst inom den politiska sfären, och kräver öppenhet om partiernas finansiering genom en lag om offentliggjorda bidragsgivare. Att politiska partier och partiägda bolag inte ska räknas som allmännyttiga vid tilldelning av lotterilicenser ligger i linje med den öppenhets- och renhållningsprincipen, förstärkt av programmets restriktiva hållning till spel. Planen behandlar inte lotterilicenser, så ställningstagandet är härlett.
- corruption-free politicsdecisive»Alla former av korruption måste motarbetas. Det gäller inte minst inom den politiska sfären.« (party programme ↗)“All forms of corruption must be combated. This applies especially within the political sphere.”
- transparency in party financing»Vi vill ha en lag om att politiska partier och enskilda kandidater ska offentliggöra sina bidragsgivare.« (party programme ↗)“We want a law requiring that political parties and individual candidates disclose their donors.”
- restrictive gambling policy»Sexistisk reklam och reklam riktad mot barn under tolv år ska vara förbjudet, liksom reklam för spel och alkohol.« (party programme ↗)“Sexist advertising and advertising targeted at children under twelve should be forbidden, as should advertising for gambling and alcohol.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan establishes that rules for financing political parties should be tightened and that Sweden shall become even more transparent with tightened rules against corruption.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that rules for financing political parties should be tightened and that Sweden shall become even more transparent with tightened rules against corruption. Excluding parties and party-owned companies from the exemption for general-purpose lotteries aligns with this. The plan simultaneously wants to protect civil society's self-financing, which argues for leaving other general-purpose purposes untouched.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att reglerna för finansiering av politiska partier bör skärpas och att Sverige ska bli ännu mer transparent med skärpta regler mot korruption. Att utesluta partier och partiägda bolag från undantaget för allmännyttiga lotterier ligger i linje med detta. Planen vill samtidigt värna civilsamhällets egenfinansiering, vilket talar för att övriga allmännyttiga ändamål lämnas orörda.
- tightened rules for party financingdecisive»De politiska partierna är sårbara mot påverkan och infiltration. Reglerna för finansiering av politiska partier bör skärpas och deras motståndskraft mot yttre påverkan och infiltration rustas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Political parties are vulnerable to influence and infiltration. Rules for financing political parties should be tightened and their resistance to external influence and infiltration strengthened.”
- transparency and anti-corruption»Sverige ska bli ännu mer transparent. Vi vill inrätta en antikorruptionsmyndighet, skärpa regler mot korruption och införa ett lobbyregister.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden shall become even more transparent. We want to establish an anti-corruption authority, tighten rules against corruption and introduce a lobbying register.”
- protect civil society's conditions»Politiken kan stödja civilsamhället genom att involvera det i fler processer, finansiera dess infrastruktur och« (party programme ↗)“Politics can support civil society by involving it in more processes, financing its infrastructure and”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan takes no position on parties' lotteries.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan takes no position on parties' lotteries. Nearest-lying commitments are that party financing shall be regulated in law and that support for civil society shall be directed to voluntary actors, while the plan simultaneously emphasizes civil society's independence from political power. Exempting political parties and party-owned companies from purposes of general benefit aligns with this boundary-drawing, but the conclusion is uncertain.
Original (Swedish)
Planen tar inte ställning till partiers lotterier. Närmast liggande åtaganden är att partiernas finansiering ska vara reglerad i lag och att stödet till civilsamhället ska riktas till ideella aktörer, medan planen samtidigt betonar civilsamhällets oberoende av politisk makt. Att undanta politiska partier och partiägda bolag från de allmännyttiga ändamålen ligger i linje med den gränsdragningen, men slutsatsen är osäker.
- regulated party financingdecisive»Partiernas skyldighet att redovisa källorna för sin« (party programme ↗)“Parties' obligation to report sources for their”
- support directed to civil society»Vi vill fortsätta förbättra civilsamhällets finansiering genom både bredare skatteavdrag för gåvor och långsiktiga statsbidrag.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to continue improving civil society's financing through both broader tax deductions for donations and long-term state grants.”
- civil society's independence»Det offentliga ska i sin samverkan med civilsamhället respektera civilsamhällets oberoende.« (party programme ↗)“The public shall in its cooperation with civil society respect civil society's independence.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan does not address party financing or lottery exemptions.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan does not address party financing or lottery exemptions. The closest principle is that public support should first and foremost be directed towards children's and youth activities and that voluntary organisations should be prioritised, and that voluntary organisations are independent from the public sector — which suggests that the non-profit category be reserved for civil society associations rather than parties. The conclusion is therefore uncertain.
Original (Swedish)
Planen behandlar inte partiernas finansiering eller lotteriundantaget. Närmast liggande princip är att det offentliga stödet i första hand ska riktas mot barn- och ungdomsverksamhet och att ideell verksamhet ska prioriteras, samt att ideella organisationer är fristående från den offentliga sektorn — vilket talar för att den allmännyttiga kategorin förbehålls civilsamhällets föreningar snarare än partier. Slutsatsen är därför osäker.
- support primarily for children and young peopledecisive»första hand inriktas mot barn- och ungdomsverksamhet.« (party programme ↗)“first instance directed towards children's and youth activities.”
- voluntary organisations prioritised»Ideell verksamhet ska prioriteras framför kommersiella intressen vid utformningen av statens och kommunernas fritidspolitik.« (party programme ↗)“Voluntary organisations shall be prioritised over commercial interests in the design of”
- voluntary organisations independent»Det är viktigt att politiker och offentliga tjänstemän inser att ideella organisationer är fristående från den offentliga« (party programme ↗)“It is important that politicians and public officials realise that voluntary organisations are independent from the public”
- integrity»Hederlighet och personligt ansvarstagande är« (party programme ↗)“Honesty and personal accountability are”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan does not address lottery licences or parties' self-financing.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan does not address lottery licences or parties' self-financing. The closest principle is that Sweden shall have a living political life where people's social engagement can find expression, which speaks against trimming parties' and party-affiliated organizations' financing. The plan's only commitment to stopping money applies to organizations that threaten people's freedom, not to democratic parties. The evidence is weak.
Original (Swedish)
Planen behandlar inte lotterilicenser eller partiernas egenfinansiering. Närmast liggande princip är att Sverige ska ha ett levande politiskt liv där människors samhällsengagemang kan komma till uttryck, vilket talar mot att beskära partiernas och partinära föreningars finansiering. Planens enda åtagande om att stoppa pengar gäller organisationer som hotar människors frihet, inte demokratiska partier. Underlaget är svagt.
- living political lifedecisive»Sverige ska ha ett levande politiskt liv« (party programme ↗)“Sweden shall have a living political life”
- stop only anti-democrats»Stoppa utbetalningar av skattepengar till organisationer som inte delar det svenska samhällets grundläggande demokratiska värderingar utan som hotar människors frihet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Stop payments of taxpayer money to organizations that do not share Swedish society's fundamental democratic values but that threaten people's freedom”
The plan sees it as a democratic risk that organizations with important societal mandates are politically tied in a way that distorts democratic conditions, and wishes to increase transparency and accountability.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan sees it as a democratic risk that organizations with important societal mandates are politically tied in a way that distorts democratic conditions, and wishes to increase transparency and accountability. Excluding parties and party-owned companies from lottery exemptions for public benefit purposes follows that line. The plan's concern for sports movements' financing at the same time argues for caution in a broader review.
Original (Swedish)
Planen ser det som en demokratisk risk att organisationer med viktiga samhällsuppdrag är partipolitiskt knutna på ett sätt som snedvrider de demokratiska förutsättningarna, och vill öka transparensen och ansvarsutkrävandet. Att utesluta partier och partiägda bolag från lotteriundantaget för allmännyttiga ändamål följer den linjen. Planens omsorg om idrottsrörelsens finansiering talar samtidigt för försiktighet i en bredare översyn.
- against political distortiondecisive»Inom civilsamhället är både fackförbund och andra organisationer med viktiga samhällsuppdrag i hög grad partipolitiskt knutna på ett sätt som riskerar att snedvrida de demokratiska förutsättningarna.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Within civil society, both trade unions and other organizations with important societal mandates are to a high degree politically tied in a way that risks distorting democratic conditions.”
- transparency and accountability»Tjänstemannaansvar ska införas och åtgärder ska genomföras för att öka transparensen och möjligheten att utkräva politiskt ansvarsutkrävande.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Official responsibility shall be introduced and measures shall be implemented to increase transparency and the possibility to exercise political accountability.”
- protect sports conditions»Ge idrottsrörelserna förutsättningar till fortsatt livskraft« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Give sports movements conditions for continued vitality”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2022/23:KrU7)
- Committee report full text (HA01KrU7)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2022/23:1003 — Sverigevänlig konsumentpolitik av Mikael Eskilandersson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2022/23:1130 — Krafttag mot det illegala gatuspelet av Richard Jomshof (SD)
- Motion 2022/23:1142 — Spelmarknadspolitik av Jonas Andersson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2022/23:1365 — Erkännande av e-sport som sport av Lili André (KD)
- Motion 2022/23:2054 — Utgiftsområde 17 Kultur, medier, trossamfund, fritid av Lawen Redar m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2022/23:226 — Åtgärder mot lootlådor och andra lotteriliknande moment inom dataspel av Fredrik Lindahl (SD)
- Motion 2022/23:2309 — med anledning av prop. 2022/23:33 Åtgärder för att säkerställa en sund och säker spelmarknad av Vasiliki Tsouplaki m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2022/23:2310 — med anledning av prop. 2022/23:33 Åtgärder för att säkerställa en sund och säker spelmarknad av Anne-Li Sjölund m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2022/23:329 — Lagar och regler som bör avskaffas av Rickard Nordin och Niels Paarup-Petersen (båda C)
- Motion 2022/23:335 — Utveckla e-sporten och spelandet i Sverige av Rickard Nordin (C)
- Motion 2022/23:347 — Omsättningsgräns för lotterier för allmännyttiga ändamål av Rickard Nordin (C)
- Motion 2022/23:745 — Reglering av spelmarknaden och ökat skydd för personer med spelberoende av Nicklas Attefjord (MP)
- Motion 2022/23:860 — Ett idrottsliv, friluftsliv och civilsamhälle tillgängligt för alla av Anne-Li Sjölund m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2022/23:865 — Hållbar konsumentpolitik av Alireza Akhondi m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2022/23:921 — ANDTS och missbruks- och beroendevård av Linda Lindberg m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2022/23:976 — Framtidens e-sport av Michael Rubbestad m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2022/23:983 — Matchfixning och straffskärpningar av Angelika Bengtsson m.fl. (SD)
- Proposition 2022/23:33 — Åtgärder för att säkerställa en sund och säker spelmarknad
Source: The Swedish Parliament