2026-03-182025/26:JuU27 · p.1JuUJustice

Government legislative proposals

Adoption of the bill on indeterminate preventive detention

What's at stake: The decision determines whether Sweden gets a new indeterminate-length detention sanction for the most reoffending-prone violent offenders, raising questions of legal certainty and proportionality for those sentenced, while aiming to protect potential future victims.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

The question is whether Parliament should adopt the government's bill for a new indeterminate sanction, preventive security detention, for offenders at particularly high risk of violent reoffending, or reject the bill in favor of a different solution.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The committee backs the government's proposed legislation on preventive security detention, arguing that stronger protection of society is needed against people who have committed serious offenses against others and have a high risk of reoffending but are not candidates for forensic psychiatric care or life imprisonment; implementation is to resemble that for long fixed-term sentences but with a greater focus on treatment and rehabilitation, with the risk of reoffending reassessed on repeated occasions.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 1 (C)

The reservation agrees that stronger protection of society is needed and therefore accepts adopting the bill now, despite shortcomings in legal certainty, proportionality, equal treatment and fitness for purpose, but wants the exemption from the requirement for a special risk assessment removed so that such an assessment is always required before the sanction is imposed, and wants Parliament to direct the government to eventually replace the sanction with a special form of compulsory care (security care in prison) that would begin after a regular prison sentence has been served.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: adopting the government's legislative proposal and rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 1 by C.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
VNoYes 15/0/0/7departs from the planconfidence: mediumderived
SNoYes 93/0/0/13departs from the planconfidence: mediumderived
MPNoAbstain 0/0/16/2departs from the planconfidence: mediumderived
Cown reservationNoNo 0/21/0/3follows the planconfidence: mediumderived
LNoYes 10/0/0/6departs from the planconfidence: mediumderived
KDNoYes 17/0/0/2departs from the planconfidence: mediumderived
MYesYes 60/0/0/8follows the planconfidence: mediumderived
SDYesYes 62/0/0/9follows the planconfidence: mediumderived

Committee proposal

The Riksdag adopts the government's proposals for 1. law on the enforcement of preventive detention, 2. law on amendments to the Penal Code, 3. law on amendments to the Passport Act (1978:302), 4. law on amendments to the Act (1998:620) on criminal records, 5. law on amendments to the Act (1998:714) on compensation for deprivation of liberty and other coercive measures, 6. law on amendments to the Act (2000:562) on international legal assistance in criminal matters, 7. law on amendments to the Public Access to Information and Secrecy Act (2009:400), 8. law on amendments to the Act (2015:96) on recognition and enforcement of deprivation of liberty sanctions within the European Union, 9. law on amendments to the Act (2018:1250) on credit for time in detention, 10. law on amendments to the Sentencing Act (2018:1251), 11. law on amendments to the Act (2018:1693) on police processing of personal data within the scope of the crime data law, 12. law on amendments to the Act (2018:1694) on the Customs Board's processing of personal data within the scope of the crime data law, 13. law on amendments to the Act (2025:520) on international enforcement in criminal matters, 14. law on amendments to the Act (2025:798) on amendments to the Passport Act (1978:302). Thereby the Riksdag approves proposition 2025/26:95 points 1-14 and rejects the motions 2025/26:3027 by Noria Manouchi (M) amendment 8, 2025/26:3234 by Marléne Lund Kopparklint (M) amendment 1, 2025/26:3477 by Marléne Lund Kopparklint (M), 2025/26:3586 by Teresa Carvalho et al. (S) amendment 58, 2025/26:3591 by Ardalan Shekarabi et al. (S) amendment 20, 2025/26:3901 by Ulrika Liljeberg et al. (C) amendments 1 and 2 and 2025/26:3902 by Ulrika Westerlund et al. (MP) amendments 1 and 3.

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen antar regeringens förslag till 1. lag om verkställighet av säkerhetsförvaring, 2. lag om ändring i brottsbalken, 3. lag om ändring i passlagen (1978:302), 4. lag om ändring i lagen (1998:620) om belastningsregister, 5. lag om ändring i lagen (1998:714) om ersättning vid frihetsberövanden och andra tvångsåtgärder, 6. lag om ändring i lagen (2000:562) om internationell rättslig hjälp i brottmål, 7. lag om ändring i offentlighets- och sekretesslagen (2009:400), 8. lag om ändring i lagen (2015:96) om erkännande och verkställighet av frihetsberövande påföljder inom Europeiska unionen, 9. lag om ändring i lagen (2018:1250) om tillgodoräknande av tid för frihetsberövande, 10. lag om ändring i strafftidslagen (2018:1251), 11. lag om ändring i lagen (2018:1693) om polisens behandling av personuppgifter inom brottsdatalagens område, 12. lag om ändring i lagen (2018:1694) om Tullverkets behandling av personuppgifter inom brottsdatalagens område, 13. lag om ändring i lagen (2025:520) om internationell verkställighet i brottmål, 14. lag om ändring i lagen (2025:798) om ändring i passlagen (1978:302). Därmed bifaller riksdagen proposition 2025/26:95 punkterna 1-14 och avslår motionerna 2025/26:3027 av Noria Manouchi (M) yrkande 8, 2025/26:3234 av Marléne Lund Kopparklint (M) yrkande 1, 2025/26:3477 av Marléne Lund Kopparklint (M), 2025/26:3586 av Teresa Carvalho m.fl. (S) yrkande 58, 2025/26:3591 av Ardalan Shekarabi m.fl. (S) yrkande 20, 2025/26:3901 av Ulrika Liljeberg m.fl. (C) yrkandena 1 och 2 samt 2025/26:3902 av Ulrika Westerlund m.fl. (MP) yrkandena 1 och 3.

Riksdag decision: People who have committed serious crimes against other people and who also have a high risk of reoffending can be sentenced to preventive detention for an indefinite period. The Riksdag voted in favour of the government's proposal. Preventive detention means that the court first determines a minimum term to be served in prison and which corresponds to the prison sentence that would otherwise have been imposed. In addition to this, a range period shall be determined of an additional four to six years. The range period may be extended by no more than three years at a time if it is absolutely necessary to prevent the sentenced person from reoffending in serious crime. At the end of the minimum term, the court may decide on so-called conditional release. This means that the Prison Service may decide that the sentenced person shall serve the sentence outside the prison facility with special support and under supervision. If the person misbehaves or commits new crimes, the conditional release can be revoked. The purpose of the government's proposal is to strengthen society's protection against people who have committed serious crimes against other people and who also have a high risk of reoffending in such crimes, but who are not currently eligible for forensic psychiatric care or life imprisonment. The new rules come into force on April 15, 2026.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The plan requires that penalties and measures are carefully designed so that they actually lead to lower crime and do not worsen problems, and that legal certainty is maintained.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan requires that penalties and measures are carefully designed so that they actually lead to lower crime and do not worsen problems, and that legal certainty is maintained. It is simultaneously open to certain penalties needing to be tougher, but wants the emphasis to be on treatment and preventive measures. A blanket requirement for risk assessment and a compulsory care form as a long-term solution thus aligns with the plan.

Original (Swedish)

Planen kräver att straff och påföljder utformas noggrant så att de faktiskt leder till lägre brottslighet och inte förvärrar problem, och att rättssäkerheten upprätthålls. Den är samtidigt öppen för att vissa straff behöver skärpas, men vill att tyngdpunkten ligger på behandling och förebyggande insatser. Ett undantagslöst krav på riskutredning och en tvångsvårdsform som långsiktig lösning ligger därför i linje med planen.

  • carefully designed measuresdecisive»Straff och andra påföljder för brott behöver vara noggrant« (party programme ↗)“Penalties and other measures for crime need to be carefully”
  • legal certainty»Utvecklingen av ett rättsväsende byggt på rättssäkerhet är viktig« (party programme ↗)“Development of a justice system built on legal certainty is important”
  • prevention before repression»Vissa straff kan behöva höjas men mycket mer fokus måste riktas mot att förhindra rekryteringen av nya barn till gängkriminalitet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Some penalties may need to be increased but much more focus must be directed at preventing the recruitment of new children into gang crime.”
  • legal certainty and transparency»Rättssäkerheten behöver upprätthållas genom rättshjälp, medborgerlig« (party programme ↗)“Legal certainty needs to be maintained through legal aid, citizen”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

SSocialdemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The plan requires that criminal policy is built on evidence, efficiency and legal certainty, which carries the counter-proposal's requirement that a special risk assessment always be conducted before an indeterminate sentence is imposed.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan requires that criminal policy is built on evidence, efficiency and legal certainty, which carries the counter-proposal's requirement that a special risk assessment always be conducted before an indeterminate sentence is imposed. The plan simultaneously stands behind punishment commensurate with the seriousness of crimes, which explains that the legislation is accepted at present. The commitment to rehabilitation and return to society also supports the idea of a special care form as a long-term solution.

Original (Swedish)

Planen kräver att kriminalpolitiken byggs på evidens, effektivitet och rättssäkerhet, vilket bär motförslagets krav på att en särskild riskutredning alltid ska göras innan en tidsobestämd påföljd döms ut. Planen står samtidigt bakom straff i paritet med brottens allvar, vilket förklarar att lagstiftningen accepteras i nuläget. Åtagandet om rehabilitering och återgång i samhället stödjer även tanken på en särskild vårdform som långsiktig lösning.

  • evidence and legal certaintydecisive»Kriminalpolitik byggd på evidens, effektivitet och rättssäkerhet.« (party programme ↗)“Criminal policy built on evidence, efficiency and legal certainty.”
  • rehabilitation as goal»Fokus på rehabilitering och återgång i samhället.« (party programme ↗)“Focus on rehabilitation and return to society.”
  • proportionate punishment»Straff i paritet med brottens allvar.« (party programme ↗)“Punishment commensurate with the seriousness of crimes.”
  • criminal justice in public management»Rustad kriminalvård i offentlig regi.« (party programme ↗)“Equipped criminal justice in public management.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MPMiljöpartietNoAbstaindeparts from the planderived

The plan's decisive commitment is that all new legislation shall be carefully reviewed in terms of legal security and fundamental freedoms and rights and that crime-fighting shall not take place at the expense of the rule of law.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan's decisive commitment is that all new legislation shall be carefully reviewed in terms of legal security and fundamental freedoms and rights and that crime-fighting shall not take place at the expense of the rule of law. An unconditional requirement for special risk assessment, and a form of care instead of indefinite detention, are precisely such legal security requirements. The plan also emphasizes rehabilitation and that deprivation of liberty should lead back to society.

Original (Swedish)

Planens avgörande åtagande är att all ny lagstiftning ska prövas noggrant utifrån rättssäkerhet och grundläggande fri- och rättigheter och att brottsbekämpning inte får ske på bekostnad av rättsstatens principer. Ett undantagslöst krav på särskild riskutredning, och en vårdform i stället för tidsobestämd inlåsning, är just sådana rättssäkerhetskrav. Planen betonar också rehabilitering och att frihetsberövande ska leda tillbaka till samhället.

  • legal security review of lawsdecisive»prövas noggrant utifrån rättssäkerhet och grundläggande fri- och rättigheter.« (party programme ↗)“be carefully reviewed in terms of legal security and fundamental freedoms and rights.”
  • rule of law principles weigh»Brottsbekämpning ska inte ske på bekostnad av« (party programme ↗)“Crime-fighting shall not take place at the expense of”
  • equality before the law»Alla ska vara lika inför lagen och rättssäkerheten måste garanteras i« (party programme ↗)“Everyone should be equal before the law and legal security must be guaranteed in”
  • proportional penalties»Frivårdspåföljder ska användas som förstahandsval vid lindrigare brott.« (party programme ↗)“Community service sentences should be used as the first choice for minor offences.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

CCenterpartietNoNofollows the planderived

The plan defends the rule of law and the individual's rights against the state and requires proportionality between legislation's intrusion and its purpose.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan defends the rule of law and the individual's rights against the state and requires proportionality between legislation's intrusion and its purpose. Always requiring a special risk assessment before an indeterminate sentence is handed down is exactly such a legal security guarantee. The plan's criminal policy shall moreover stimulate the sentenced person towards a new life situation without crime, which argues for a care-oriented long-term solution.

Original (Swedish)

Planen försvarar rättsstaten och individens rättigheter gentemot staten och kräver proportionalitet mellan lagstiftningens ingrepp och dess syfte. Att alltid kräva en särskild riskutredning innan en tidsobestämd påföljd döms ut är just en sådan rättssäkerhetsgaranti. Planens kriminalpolitik ska dessutom stimulera den dömde till en ny livssituation utan brottslighet, vilket talar för en vårdinriktad långsiktig lösning.

  • the rule of law's protection of the individualdecisive»Rättsstaten och individens rättigheter gentemot staten måste försvaras.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The rule of law and the individual's rights against the state must be defended.”
  • proportionality in legislation»Det måste finnas en proportionalitet mellan lagstiftningens inskränkning av medborgarnas integritet och lagarnas syfte.« (party programme ↗)“There must be proportionality between legislation's restriction of citizens' integrity and the laws' purpose.”
  • care and reintegration»Kriminalpolitiken ska därför både förebygga och avskräcka från brott, stödja brottsdrabbade och stimulera dem som har begått olagliga handlingar till en ny livssituation utan brottslighet.« (party programme ↗)“Criminal policy shall therefore both prevent and deter from crime, support victims of crime and stimulate those who have committed unlawful actions towards a new life situation without crime.”
  • societal protection against serious crime»Samhället ska inte vika sig för gängen. För att besegra dem krävs bättre insatser som förebygger nyrekrytering, mer resurser till polis, åklagare, domstolar och kriminalvården och strängare straff.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Society shall not yield to gangs. To defeat them requires better measures that prevent recruitment, more resources for police, prosecutors, courts and the prison service and stricter penalties.”
LLiberalernaNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The plan requires that legal certainty and protection for civil liberties and rights be strengthened, and that care and treatment be provided on a scientific basis even for inmates.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan requires that legal certainty and protection for civil liberties and rights be strengthened, and that care and treatment be provided on a scientific basis even for inmates. An unconditional requirement for special risk assessment before an indefinite sentence is imposed is exactly such a legal certainty guarantee. The plan at the same time shares the law's purpose of protecting society from lifestyle criminals.

Original (Swedish)

Planen kräver att rättssäkerheten och skyddet för de medborgerliga fri- och rättigheterna förstärks, och att vård och behandling ges på vetenskaplig grund även för intagna. Ett undantagslöst krav på särskild riskutredning innan en tidsobestämd påföljd döms ut är just en sådan rättssäkerhetsgaranti. Planen delar samtidigt lagens syfte att skydda samhället från livsstilskriminella.

  • strengthened legal certaintydecisive»Rättssäkerheten och skyddet för de medborgerliga fri- och rättigheterna behöver förstärkas.« (party programme ↗)“Legal certainty and protection for civil liberties and rights need to be strengthened.”
  • scientifically-based care»Vård, behandling och rehabilitering av fysiska och psykiska sjukdomar ska ges på« (party programme ↗)“Care, treatment and rehabilitation of physical and mental illnesses shall be provided on”
  • treatment during sentence»Intagna på fängelser ska erbjudas arbete, behandling och utbildning under strafftiden.« (party programme ↗)“Inmates in prisons shall be offered work, treatment and education during their sentence.”
  • society protection against reoffending»Livsstilskriminella ska hållas inlåsta i stället för att släppas ut på våra gator.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Lifestyle criminals shall be kept locked up instead of being released onto our streets.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

KDKristdemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The plan lays down that the imposed sanction must normally be time-limited, which justifies that an indeterminate sanction is surrounded by strong legal safeguards and that the exception from special risk assessment is removed.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan lays down that the imposed sanction must normally be time-limited, which justifies that an indeterminate sanction is surrounded by strong legal safeguards and that the exception from special risk assessment is removed. At the same time, the plan's requirement that society be protected against abuse carries the basic legislation that the counter-proposal accepts. The requirement for a compulsory care form as a long-term solution is in line with criminal and probation services being given sufficient resources for necessary care.

Original (Swedish)

Planen slår fast att den utdömda påföljden normalt ska vara tidsbestämd, vilket motiverar att en tidsobestämd påföljd omgärdas av starka rättssäkerhetsgarantier och att undantaget från särskild riskutredning tas bort. Samtidigt bär planens krav på att samhället skyddas mot övergrepp den grundläggande lagstiftningen som motförslaget accepterar. Kravet på en tvångsvårdsform som långsiktig lösning ligger i linje med att kriminal- och frivården ska ges tillräckliga resurser för erforderlig vård.

  • time-limited sanctionsdecisive»Den utdömda påföljden ska normalt vara tidsbestämd.« (party programme ↗)“The imposed sanction must normally be time-limited.”
  • predictable and humane legislation»innefatta snabba och förutsägbara reaktioner som är förankrade i en human och tydlig« (party programme ↗)“include swift and predictable responses that are anchored in a humane and clear”
  • societal protection»avskräcka andra från liknande handlingar samt skydda samhället mot övergrepp och andra« (party programme ↗)“deter others from similar actions and protect society against abuse and other”
  • care within criminal justice services»Kriminal- och frivården ska ges tillräckliga resurser för att kunna ge erforderlig vård och i« (party programme ↗)“Criminal and probation services must be given sufficient resources to provide necessary care and”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MModeraternaYesYesfollows the planderived

The plan commits to a detention sentence where socially dangerous criminals are kept locked up as long as they are dangerous, with public safety as the starting point.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan commits to a detention sentence where socially dangerous criminals are kept locked up as long as they are dangerous, with public safety as the starting point. The counter-proposal's demand that a special compulsory care form shall replace the solution in the long run shifts focus from punishment to care, which the plan does not support. The plan's line is that criminals should be locked up and that focus should shift to the crime victim.

Original (Swedish)

Planen utfäster ett förvaringsstraff där samhällsfarliga brottslingar hålls inlåsta så länge de är farliga, med samhällsskyddet som utgångspunkt. Motförslagets krav på att en särskild tvångsvårdsform ska ersätta lösningen på sikt flyttar fokus från straff till vård, vilket planen inte ställer sig bakom. Planens linje är att brottslingarna ska sitta inne och att fokus ska flyttas till brottsoffret.

  • detention sentence for dangerous criminalsdecisive»Införa en ny typ av förvaringsstraff så att serievåldtäktsmän och andra samhällsfarliga brottslingar kan sitta frihetsberövade så länge de är farliga för allmänheten« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Introduce a new type of detention sentence so that serial rapists and other socially dangerous criminals can be imprisoned as long as they are dangerous to the public”
  • public safety through detention»Där du kan vara trygg när du är ute, för att brottslingarna sitter inne.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Where you can be safe when you are out, because the criminals are locked up.”
  • focus on crime victim»Införa en ny brottsbalk för att skifta fokus från gärningsmannen till brottsoffer« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Introduce a new criminal code to shift focus from the perpetrator to crime victim”
  • legal certainty in the justice system»Sverige ska ha ett rättsväsende präglat av rättssäkerhet« (party programme ↗)“Sweden shall have a justice system marked by legal certainty”
SDSverigedemokraternaYesYesfollows the planderived

The counter-proposal wishes to require special risk assessment in all cases and eventually replace the sanction with a coercive care form after serving the sentence.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The counter-proposal wishes to require special risk assessment in all cases and eventually replace the sanction with a coercive care form after serving the sentence. The plan is based on incapacitation: dangerous criminals shall be prevented from committing new crimes, and those who commit serious crimes may be sentenced to indefinite detention. Moving the focus toward care and adding procedural obstacles contradicts that commitment.

Original (Swedish)

Motförslaget vill kräva särskild riskutredning i alla fall och på sikt ersätta påföljden med en tvångsvårdsform efter avtjänat straff. Planen bygger på inkapacitering: farliga kriminella ska hindras från att begå nya brott, och den som begår allvarliga brott ska kunna dömas till förvaring på obestämd tid. Att flytta tyngdpunkten mot vård och lägga till processuella hinder står i strid med det åtagandet.

  • incapacitation over caredecisive»Straff ska inte bara ses som en rehabiliterande åtgärd, utan genom att stå i proportion till gärningen ge upprättelse åt brottsoffer och genom inkapacitering hindra att farliga kriminella kan begå nya brott.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Punishment should not only be seen as a rehabilitative measure, but by being proportionate to the deed provide redress to crime victims and through incapacitation prevent dangerous criminals from committing new crimes.”
  • indefinite detention»Den som finns i gängmiljö och begår brott ska kunna dömas till särskilt långa fängelsestraff eller förvaring på obestämd tid.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Those found in gang environments and committing crimes may be sentenced to particularly long prison sentences or indefinite detention.”
  • shifted criminal policy»Sverigedemokraterna vill lägga om kriminalpolitiken till att i högre grad låsa in och utvisa de kriminella som skapar otrygghet och begår brott.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden Democrats wish to shift criminal policy to a greater degree toward locking up and deporting the criminals who create insecurity and commit crimes.”
  • victims before perpetrators»Brottsoffers och potentiella brottsoffers intressen måste i alla lägen sättas framför« (party programme ↗)“Crime victims' and potential crime victims' interests must in all cases be put before”

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament