2023-05-312022/23:NU17 · p.3NUBusiness & energy
Other matters concerning energy policy direction
Statutory phase-out of fossil energy and a national energy-storage strategy
What's at stake: A statutory phase-out would give clear political leadership on climate and steer investment toward renewables, but it would also impose a binding end date on fossil-based processes nationwide, affecting industries and operations that currently rely on fossil energy.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the government should pursue a statutory phase-out of fossil energy with a 2030 end date and a national energy-storage strategy, or whether the general direction of energy policy should continue without such new formal statements.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee rejects the motions on the general direction of energy policy, including the call for a statutory phase-out of fossil energy by 2030, and instead points to existing policy and ongoing efforts in the area.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 4 (MP)
The reservation argues that Sweden lacks clear political leadership on climate and that the state should set the direction through legislation, with a transition law setting a 2030 end date for fossil energy followed by a total ban, a national implementation plan, and a national strategy with technology-neutral support for energy storage to manage a power system with more weather-dependent production.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 4 by MP.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Abstain 2/0/19/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: high | derived |
| S | Yes | Yes 75/0/18/14 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| MP | No | No 0/16/0/2 | follows the plan | confidence: high | explicit |
| C | Yes | Abstain 0/0/20/4 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| L | Yes | Yes 13/0/0/3 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| KD | Yes | Yes 17/0/0/2 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| M | Yes | Yes 60/0/0/8 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | explicit |
| SD | Yes | Yes 62/0/0/10 | follows the plan | confidence: high | not addressed |
Broke with the party line
| VKarin Rågsjö (V, Stockholms kommun) | Yes — party line: Abstain |
| VMaj Karlsson (V, Göteborgs kommun) | Yes — party line: Abstain |
| SAnna Vikström (S, Stockholms län) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
| SAnnette Rydell (S, Blekinge län) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
| SAnnika Strandhäll (S, Stockholms kommun) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
| SArwin Sohrabi (S, Malmö kommun) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
| SCarina Ödebrink (S, Jönköpings län) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
| SDenis Begic (S, Örebro län) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
| SHeléne Björklund (S, Blekinge län) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
| SJessica Rodén (S, Västra Götalands läns södra) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
| SJohan Andersson (S, Östergötlands län) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
| SJohan Löfstrand (S, Östergötlands län) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
| SKadir Kasirga (S, Stockholms kommun) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
| SLena Hallengren (S, Kalmar län) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
| SMathias Tegnér (S, Stockholms län) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
| SMats Wiking (S, Västra Götalands läns norra) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
| SMorgan Johansson (S, Skåne läns södra) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
| SNiklas Sigvardsson (S, Jönköpings län) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
| SSerkan Köse (S, Stockholms län) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
| STomas Kronståhl (S, Kalmar län) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
MPs whose vote differs from their party's majority position in this division. Marked with a dark ring in the chamber view.
Committee proposal
Parliament rejects the motions 2022/23:36 by Per Bolund et al. (MP) demand 26, 2022/23:936 by Tobias Andersson et al. (SD) demand 3, 2022/23:964 by Tobias Andersson et al. (SD) demand 1, 2022/23:1120 by Catarina Deremar et al. (C) demand 12, 2022/23:1123 by Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist et al. (C) demands 12 and 13, 2022/23:1504 by Dzenan Cisija and Amalia Rud Pedersen (both S), 2022/23:1593 by Sofia Amloh et al. (S), 2022/23:1982 by Aylin Fazelian et al. (S), 2022/23:2175 by Per Bolund et al. (MP) demands 7, 8, 44 and 58, and 2022/23:2190 by Annie Lööf et al. (C) demands 7, 59, 69, 113-115, 117 and 120.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2022/23:36 av Per Bolund m.fl. (MP) yrkande 26, 2022/23:936 av Tobias Andersson m.fl. (SD) yrkande 3, 2022/23:964 av Tobias Andersson m.fl. (SD) yrkande 1, 2022/23:1120 av Catarina Deremar m.fl. (C) yrkande 12, 2022/23:1123 av Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist m.fl. (C) yrkandena 12 och 13, 2022/23:1504 av Dzenan Cisija och Amalia Rud Pedersen (båda S), 2022/23:1593 av Sofia Amloh m.fl. (S), 2022/23:1982 av Aylin Fazelian m.fl. (S), 2022/23:2175 av Per Bolund m.fl. (MP) yrkandena 7, 8, 44 och 58 samt 2022/23:2190 av Annie Lööf m.fl. (C) yrkandena 7, 59, 69, 113-115, 117 och 120.
Riksdag decision: Parliament approved the Government's proposal for new requirements for storage and supply of natural gas. The proposals are based on amendments to two EU regulations concerning gas storage and include, among other things, that anyone who has a gas storage facility or intends to put such a facility into operation must be certified. Parliament simultaneously rejected 127 proposals in motions concerning various energy policy issues that were submitted during the ordinary motion period 2022. The proposals concern, among other things, the direction of energy policy, nuclear power, energy efficiency, energy research and various types of renewable energy. The committee refers, among other things, to the policy pursued, ongoing efforts and inquiries. The legislative changes are proposed to enter into force on 1 July 2023.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants a transition law to be adopted with a 2030 deadline for fossil energy sources, a national implementation plan to be established, and technology-neutral support for energy storage to be adopted. (MP) — Reservation 4
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan explains climate emergency, requires that the transition happens immediately and that governance is tightened based on new climate goals, and establishes that powerful legislation is needed because the market does not solve the problem.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan explains climate emergency, requires that the transition happens immediately and that governance is tightened based on new climate goals, and establishes that powerful legislation is needed because the market does not solve the problem. Enacting a deadline in 2030 for fossil energy with an implementation plan follows from that. The plan also requires sharply increased renewable electricity production, which presupposes a strategy for storage in a weather-dependent system.
Original (Swedish)
Planen förklarar klimatnödläge, kräver att omställningen sker omgående och att styrningen skärps utifrån nya klimatmål, och slår fast att kraftfull lagstiftning behövs eftersom marknaden inte löser problemet. Att lagstifta om ett slutdatum 2030 för fossil energi med genomförandeplan följer av det. Planen kräver också kraftigt ökad förnybar elproduktion, vilket förutsätter en strategi för lagring i ett väderberoende system.
- transition immediatelydecisive»Omställningen behöver ske omgående och alla politiska beslut behöver ta hänsyn till den akuta kris som vi befinner oss i.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The transition needs to happen immediately and all political decisions need to take into account the acute crisis we find ourselves in.”
- legislate on phase-out»Därför behövs en kraftfull lagstiftning, ekonomiska styrmedel, långsiktig samhällsplanering, klimatinvesteringar« (party programme ↗)“Therefore, powerful legislation, economic instruments, long-term societal planning, climate investments are needed”
- tightened climate goals»Investeringar i grön teknik, industri och infrastruktur, utbyggd energikapacitet och stärkt styrning utifrån nya, skärpta klimatmål behövs.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Investments in green technology, industry and infrastructure, expanded energy capacity and tightened governance based on new, tightened climate goals are needed.”
- renewable energy and storage»Produktionen av både el och exempelvis vätgas behöver öka kraftigt när vi ställer om från användning av fossila bränslen« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Production of both electricity and for example hydrogen needs to increase sharply when we transition away from the use of fossil fuels”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan's climate commitment is the existing framework and net-zero emissions by 2045, not a statutory deadline of 2030 with a total ban on fossil fuels.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's climate commitment is the existing framework and net-zero emissions by 2045, not a statutory deadline of 2030 with a total ban on fossil fuels. The plan instead wants to secure fuel supply during price increases and tests all energy sources without sacred cows, which does not align with a ban in seven years. The energy storage strategy is compatible with the plan but does not support the counter-proposal. The plan therefore argues against the demand.
Original (Swedish)
Planens klimatåtagande är det befintliga ramverket och nettonollutsläpp 2045, inte ett lagstadgat slutdatum 2030 med totalförbud mot fossil energi. Planen vill tvärtom säkra tillgången till bränsle under prisuppgången och prövar alla energislag utan heliga kor, vilket inte går ihop med ett förbud om sju år. Energilagringsstrategin är förenlig med planen, men bär inte motförslaget. Planen talar därför mot kravet.
- climate framework remains in placedecisive»Det klimatpolitiska ramverket ska ligga fast.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The climate policy framework must remain in place.”
- net-zero emissions 2045»År 2045 ska Sverige inte ha några nettoutsläpp av växthusgaser till atmosfären, för att därefter uppnå negativa utsläpp.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“By 2045, Sweden shall have no net greenhouse gas emissions to the atmosphere, and thereafter achieve negative emissions.”
- secure fuel supply»Säkra tillgången till bränsle.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Secure fuel supply.”
- all energy sources are tested»När det gäller att lösa Sveriges energibehov finns inga heliga kor.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“When it comes to solving Sweden's energy needs, there are no sacred cows.”
The election manifesto requires a transition law that phases out coal, oil and fossil gas by at the latest 2030 and that Sweden becomes a fossil-free welfare state the same year, which is precisely the counter-proposal's legally set deadline.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto requires a transition law that phases out coal, oil and fossil gas by at the latest 2030 and that Sweden becomes a fossil-free welfare state the same year, which is precisely the counter-proposal's legally set deadline. The plan also wants to invest in energy storage and a smart energy system, which corresponds to the requirement for an energy storage strategy. The plan therefore supports the requirement.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet kräver en omställningslag som fasar ut kol, olja och fossilgas till senast 2030 och att Sverige blir ett fossilfritt välfärdsland samma år, vilket är precis motförslagets lagstiftade slutdatum. Planen vill dessutom investera i energilager och ett smart energisystem, vilket motsvarar kravet på en energilagringsstrategi. Planen stöder därför kravet.
- phasing out by law by 2030decisive»införa en omställningslag så att all industri fasar ut kol, olja och fossilgas till senast 2030.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“introduce a transition law so that all industry phases out coal, oil and fossil gas by at the latest 2030.”
- focus on energy storage»bygga ut elnäten, investera i energilager och satsa på ett smart energisystem.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“expand the electricity network, invest in energy storage and focus on a smart energy system.”
- fossil-free Sweden 2030»investera minst 100 miljarder per år i att ställa om så att Sverige blir ett fossilfritt välfärdsland senast år 2030.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“invest at least 100 billion per year in the transition so that Sweden becomes a fossil-free welfare state by at the latest 2030.”
- binding climate framework»För att klara klimatmålen krävs ett klimatpolitiskt« (party programme ↗)“To achieve climate targets, a climate-political”
The plan's climate line is economic instruments and technological development, not prohibition legislation: carbon pricing and green tax shifting shall drive the transition, and leadership shall prioritize effective measures over symbolic politics.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's climate line is economic instruments and technological development, not prohibition legislation: carbon pricing and green tax shifting shall drive the transition, and leadership shall prioritize effective measures over symbolic politics. The party programme's time horizon for one hundred percent renewable is within less than a generation, not a statutory total ban in 2030. The requirement for an energy storage strategy lies instead close to the plan's goal of robust electricity supply, but the main requirement is rejected.
Original (Swedish)
Planens klimatlinje är ekonomiska styrmedel och teknikutveckling, inte förbudslagstiftning: pris på utsläpp och grön skatteväxling ska driva omställningen, och ledarskapet ska prioritera effektiva åtgärder framför symbolpolitik. Partiprogrammets tidshorisont för hundra procent förnybart är inom mindre än en generation, inte ett lagstadgat totalförbud 2030. Kravet på energilagringsstrategi ligger däremot nära planens mål om robust elförsörjning, men huvudkravet avvisas.
- carbon pricing as a tooldecisive»Pris på utsläpp kan samla kraften från miljontals entreprenörer och mångfalt fler konsumenter« (party programme ↗)“Price on emissions can marshal the strength from millions of entrepreneurs and far more consumers”
- effective measures, not symbolic politics»Ett ledarskap som prioriterar effektiva åtgärder framför symbolpolitik eller passivitet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“A leadership that prioritizes effective measures over symbolic politics or passivity.”
- renewable within a generation»Sverige har både möjlighet och skyldighet att inom mindre än en generation bli ett samhälle med hundra procent förnybar energi« (party programme ↗)“Sweden has both the ability and the obligation to within less than a generation become a society with one hundred percent renewable energy”
- green tax shifting»Omställningen kan påskyndas med grön skatteväxling« (party programme ↗)“The transition can be accelerated with green tax shifting”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan's climate target is no net emissions by 2045 within the framework of a growing economy; a legislated end date of 2030 with thereafter a total ban on fossil energy goes far beyond and against the plan's timetable and its requirement that the state is neutral between energy sources.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's climate target is no net emissions by 2045 within the framework of a growing economy; a legislated end date of 2030 with thereafter a total ban on fossil energy goes far beyond and against the plan's timetable and its requirement that the state is neutral between energy sources. The plan wants to measure climate policy in actual emission reductions, not in bans. The demand for a strategy for energy storage has support in the plan, however.
Original (Swedish)
Planens klimatmål är inga nettoutsläpp senast 2045 inom ramen för en växande ekonomi; ett lagstadgat slutdatum 2030 med därefter totalförbud för fossil energi går långt utöver och emot planens tidtabell och dess krav på att staten är neutral mellan energislag. Planen vill mäta klimatpolitiken i faktiska utsläppsminskningar, inte i förbud. Kravet på en strategi för energilagring har däremot stöd i planen.
- climate goal 2045 with growthdecisive»Vi ska nå klimatmålen – inga nettoutsläpp av växthusgaser senast 2045 och därefter negativa utsläpp – inom ramen för en växande ekonomi.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We shall reach climate goals – no net emissions of greenhouse gases by 2045 and thereafter negative emissions – within the framework of a growing economy.”
- effect before symbolic politics»Och nu behövs en klimatpolitik som inte mäts i hur många skatter som höjs eller hur mycket den kostar skattebetalarna utan i hur mycket den på riktigt får ner utsläppen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“And now climate policy is needed that is not measured in how many taxes are raised or how much it costs taxpayers but in how much it actually gets emissions down.”
- technology-neutral energy policy»Staten ska i största möjliga mån vara neutral mellan energislag som uppfyller miljö- och säkerhetskraven.« (party programme ↗)“The state shall to the greatest possible extent be neutral between energy sources that meet environmental and safety requirements.”
- investment in energy storage»Ska vi få ner elpriserna krävs att vi bygger inte bara kärnkraft utan också mer sol- och vindkraft i hela landet, investerar i kraftsystemet och satsar på energilagring.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“To get down electricity prices we need to build not only nuclear power but also more solar and wind power throughout the country, invest in the power system and invest in energy storage.”
The plan requires long-term energy policy with fixed rules of the game and an energy system without drastic price changes, electricity shortages or other significant strains on welfare and employment.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires long-term energy policy with fixed rules of the game and an energy system without drastic price changes, electricity shortages or other significant strains on welfare and employment. A statutory end date in 2030 with thereafter a complete ban on fossil energy is precisely such a drastic transformation. The plan instead wants to expand nuclear power with long-term conditions, even though it factually shares the goal of phasing out fossil fuels.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver en långsiktig energipolitik med fasta spelregler och ett energisystem utan drastiska prisförändringar, elbrist eller andra betydande påfrestningar på välfärd och sysselsättning. Ett lagstadgat slutdatum 2030 med därefter totalförbud för fossil energi är just en sådan drastisk omställning. Planen vill i stället bygga ut kärnkraften med långsiktiga villkor, även om den i sak delar målet att fasa ut fossila bränslen.
- long-term perspective and fixed rules of the gamedecisive»Sveriges energiförsörjning ska tryggas genom en långsiktig energipolitik med fasta spelregler, där inhemska förnybara energikällor och bränslen utgör en växande bas.« (party programme ↗)“Sweden's energy supply shall be secured through long-term energy policy with fixed rules of the game, where domestic renewable energy sources and fuels form a growing base.”
- transformation without electricity shortages»drastiska prisförändringar, elbrist eller andra betydande« (party programme ↗)“drastic price changes, electricity shortages or other significant”
- expanded nuclear power»Satsa på kärnkraften med långsiktiga villkor att utvecklas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Invest in nuclear power with long-term conditions to develop.”
- phase-out of fossil fuels»Fossilbränslena måste fasas ut från såväl energi- som« (party programme ↗)“Fossil fuels must be phased out from both energy and”
Worldstate weighed in: Electricity price situation and households' strained economy after the energy crisis — strengthens the plan's requirement for transformation without drastic price changes
The plan sets the goal of net-zero emissions by 2045 at the latest and wants to change the energy policy goal to 100 per cent fossil-free, with new nuclear power and procured power that strengthens stability.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan sets the goal of net-zero emissions by 2045 at the latest and wants to change the energy policy goal to 100 per cent fossil-free, with new nuclear power and procured power that strengthens stability. The counter-proposal's requirement for legislated phasing out of fossil energy by 2030 with subsequent total ban is far more far-reaching and is based on prohibition, which the party programme's warning against expensive symbolic politics speaks against. The plan therefore rejects the requirement.
Original (Swedish)
Planen sätter målet nettonollutsläpp senast 2045 och vill ändra det energipolitiska målet till 100 procent fossilfritt, med ny kärnkraft och upphandlad kraft som stärker stabiliteten. Motförslagets krav på lagstiftad utfasning av fossil energi till 2030 med efterföljande totalförbud är betydligt mer långtgående och bygger på förbud, vilket idéprogrammets varning för dyrbar symbolpolitik talar emot. Planen avvisar därför kravet.
- net-zero 2045decisive»Vi ska som land ta fullt ansvar här hemma och nå nettonollutsläpp senast år 2045.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We should as a country take full responsibility here at home and reach net-zero emissions by 2045 at the latest.”
- fossil-free not renewable»Ändra det energipolitiska målet från 100 procent förnybart till 100 procent fossilfritt« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Change the energy policy goal from 100 per cent renewable to 100 per cent fossil-free”
- no symbolic politics»Klimatpolitiken får aldrig reduceras till dyrbar symbolpolitik eller snäv klimatnationalism.« (party programme ↗)“Climate policy must never be reduced to expensive symbolic politics or narrow climate nationalism.”
- supply security first»Upphandla kraftproduktion som stärker stabiliteten« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Procure power production that strengthens stability”
The counter-proposal wants to legislate a total ban on fossil energy from 2030.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The counter-proposal wants to legislate a total ban on fossil energy from 2030. The election manifesto establishes that evidence, results and Swedish competitiveness should guide the implementation of climate goals ahead of politicians' desire to go first and furthest, and that Swedish targets should be adapted to the EU level; the party programme states that fossil fuels must be accepted during the transition period. A legislated end date with a ban is therefore precisely the symbolic politics the plan wants to stop, even though the plan itself wants to set targets for fossil-free energy and supply security.
Original (Swedish)
Motförslaget vill lagstifta om totalförbud mot fossil energi från 2030. Valmanifestet slår fast att evidens, resultat och svensk konkurrenskraft ska styra genomförandet av klimatmål framför politikers vilja att gå först och längst, och att de svenska målen bör anpassas till EU-nivån; partiprogrammet konstaterar att fossila bränslen måste accepteras under omställningstiden. Ett lagstadgat slutdatum med förbud är därför just den symbolpolitik planen vill stoppa, även om planen i sig vill sätta mål för fossilfrihet och leveranssäkerhet.
- competitiveness guides climate goalsdecisive»Evidens, resultat och svensk konkurrenskraft ska styra genomförandet av klimatmål i högre utsträckning än politikers vilja att gå först och längst.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Evidence, results and Swedish competitiveness should guide the implementation of climate goals to a greater extent than politicians' desire to go first and furthest.”
- climate targets at EU pace»De svenska klimatmålen bör anpassas till den klimatlagstiftning som finns på EU-nivå« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Swedish climate targets should be adapted to the climate legislation that exists at EU level”
- fossil during transition»Under utvecklingstiden och framtagandet av nya energisystem måste vi acceptera att vi använder« (party programme ↗)“During the development period and creation of new energy systems we must accept that we use”
- stop symbolic politics»Stoppa symbolpolitik som går ut över möjligheten att bedriva industri och näring« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Stop symbolic politics that goes at the expense of the ability to conduct industry and business”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2022/23:NU17)
- Committee report full text (HA01NU17)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2022/23:1120 — Nordiskt samarbete av Catarina Deremar m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2022/23:1123 — Den svenska basindustrin av Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2022/23:1183 — Introduktionsstöd för nya elektrobränslen av Malin Larsson och Peder Björk (båda S)
- Motion 2022/23:1235 — Omställning till förnybar energiförsörjning av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2022/23:1411 — Åtgärder för ett mer hållbart och konkurrenskraftigt yrkesfiske av Johan Hultberg (M)
- Motion 2022/23:1424 — Energi av Adnan Dibrani och Jennie Nilsson (båda S)
- Motion 2022/23:150 — Grönt flyg av Eva Lindh (S)
- Motion 2022/23:1504 — Utbyggnad av hållbar elproduktion av Dzenan Cisija och Amalia Rud Pedersen (båda S)
- Motion 2022/23:1513 — Ny elproduktion i elområde 3 och 4 av Larry Söder (KD)
- Motion 2022/23:1593 — Säkrad energiförsörjning genom samordning av Sofia Amloh m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2022/23:1641 — Förnybar energiomställning av Martina Johansson och Mikael Larsson (båda C)
- Motion 2022/23:1672 — En levande landsbygd för Sveriges bästa av Annie Lööf m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2022/23:1792 — Elkrisen påverkan på Skåne av Ulrika Heindorff m.fl. (M)
- Motion 2022/23:1820 — Behålla och bygga ut kärnkraften av Sten Bergheden (M)
- Motion 2022/23:1822 — Skaraborg som utvecklingscentrum för vätgas av Sten Bergheden (M)
- Motion 2022/23:1982 — Göteborgsområdets elförsörjning av Aylin Fazelian m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2022/23:2065 — Barsebäcks kärnkraftverk 2.0 av Jörgen Grubb m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2022/23:2067 — Utökad kraftproduktion i Forsmarks kärnkraftverk av David Perez m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2022/23:2073 — Utgiftsområde 20 Allmän miljö- och naturvård av Anna-Caren Sätherberg m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2022/23:2112 — El- och energiförsörjning för ökad tillväxt och välstånd av Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S)
Source: The Swedish Parliament