Follow-up and evaluation of the reform

The plan does not address this reform, but it requires that political proposals build on stable research and show themselves to be effective and just when implemented, and that society is always there for those who need it. A prompt follow-up that also includes groups outside those receiving the enhanced support is one way to test whether the commitment is fulfilled. The conclusion is inferred from general principles and therefore uncertain.

• proposals that prove effectivedecisive»En framgångsrik rörelse för ett bättre samhälle behöver bygga på stabil forskning och förslag som visar sig effektiva och rättvisa den dag de genomförs.« (party programme ↗)“A successful movement for a better society needs to build on stable research and proposals that show themselves to be effective and just when they are implemented.”
• welfare for those who need it»Vi vill bygga ett samhälle som alltid finns där för den som behöver det.« (party programme ↗)“We want to build a society that is always there for those who need it.”
• reflection and follow-up»Att utveckla kloka politiska lösningar kräver alltid tid och eftertanke.« (party programme ↗)“Developing wise political solutions always requires time and reflection.”

The plan demands equal dental care integrated into other health care and equal rights for all to good care through public provision. A prompt review that also includes other groups than those receiving the enhanced support is a way to ensure that the reform truly provides care according to need and not according to wallet. The counter-proposal is supported.

• equal dental caredecisive»Jämlik tandvård som integreras i övrig hälso- och sjukvård.« (party programme ↗)“Equal dental care integrated into other health care.”
• equal rights to good care»Lika rätt för alla till god hälso- och sjukvård genom samhällets försorg.« (party programme ↗)“Equal rights for all to good health care through public provision.”
• care according to need»vård utifrån behov, och inte utifrån möjligheten att betala« (party programme ↗)“care according to need, and not according to ability to pay”
• equal public health»Jämlik och jämställd folkhälsa.« (party programme ↗)“Equal and equitable public health.”

The plan establishes that care and support shall be provided according to need and that people with the greatest need shall be prioritized, and that welfare shall be built on the basis of solidarity. Swift follow-up that also covers groups other than those receiving the strengthened support is a way to ensure that the reform does not pull the rug from under those with the greatest need. The plan does not address follow-up forms, so the assessment is inferred.

• needs-based prioritizationdecisive»Människor med störst behov ska prioriteras.« (party programme ↗)“People with the greatest need shall be prioritized.”
• care according to need»tillgång till vård efter behov« (party programme ↗)“access to care according to need”
• solidarity-based welfare»Välfärden ska byggas utifrån solidaritet, inte marknadslogik.« (party programme ↗)“Welfare shall be built on the basis of solidarity, not market logic.”

The plan establishes that publicly financed services shall be equivalent for all and of the same good quality, and it values results over political posturing. Prompt follow-up that captures even groups other than those receiving the enhanced support tests precisely whether the reform holds that promise. The plan does not speak to follow-up forms, so the support is inferred and uncertain.

• equivalent quality in welfaredecisive»Det som det offentliga finansierar ska vara likvärdigt för alla och med samma goda kvalitet till alla.« (party programme ↗)“What the public finances must be equivalent for all and of the same good quality for all.”
• results over political posturing»Vi värderar samarbete, ansvarstagande och resultat framför politiskt spel.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We value cooperation, responsibility-taking and results over political posturing.”
• openness and follow-up»Öppenhet och transparens är grundförutsättningar för frihet, demokrati och för att förhindra korruption och övergrepp.« (party programme ↗)“Openness and transparency are fundamental prerequisites for freedom, democracy and for preventing corruption and abuse.”

The plan says nothing about the follow-up of precisely this reform. The closest-lying principle is that welfare efforts shall rest on scientific grounds and be followed up against nationally established quality standards, and that groups with greatest need should be prioritised. Based on that principle, a quick follow-up that also captures other groups is in line with the plan, but the conclusion is weakly supported.

• scientifically grounded caredecisive»Vård, behandling och rehabilitering av fysiska och psykiska sjukdomar ska ges på vetenskaplig grund.« (party programme ↗)“Care, treatment and rehabilitation of physical and mental illness shall be provided on scientific grounds.”
• national quality follow-up»Tillsynen ska ske i statlig regi utifrån nationellt fastställda kvalitetsnormer.« (party programme ↗)“Supervision shall take place in state hands based on nationally established quality standards.”
• prioritisation by need»De personer som har sämst munhälsa ska prioriteras.« (party programme ↗)“People with the poorest dental health shall be prioritised.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

The plan makes evaluation, cost monitoring and quality control important political tasks and requires that all political decisions be made according to the stewardship principle, so that consequences are considered. The counter-proposal's demand for prompt follow-up that also covers other groups than those receiving the enhanced support follows from this, strengthened by the plan's solidarity with the weak and vulnerable.

• follow-up as political taskdecisive»kostnadsuppföljning och kvalitetskontroll är därför viktiga politiska uppgifter« (party programme ↗)“cost monitoring and quality control are therefore important political tasks”
• consequences should be considered»Alla politiska beslut bör fattas i enlighet med förvaltarskapsprincipen, vilket innebär att« (party programme ↗)“All political decisions should be made in accordance with the stewardship principle, which means that”
• solidarity with the vulnerable»Solidaritet med svaga och utsatta« (party programme ↗)“Solidarity with the weak and vulnerable”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

The plan does not address this particular reform, but the party programme states constant preparedness to evaluate, reassess, change and improve what has been implemented. The election manifesto also requires that taxpayers get value for their money and the party programme that public waste is combated. This supports the demand for prompt follow-up of the reform's consequences, also for groups other than those receiving the reinforced support.

• evaluate completed reformsdecisive»beredskap för att utvärdera, ompröva, förändra och förbättra« (party programme ↗)“preparedness to evaluate, reassess, change and improve”
• value for tax money»Du som betalar in skatt ska också få valuta för dina inbetalade skattepengar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“You who pay taxes should also get value for your paid tax money.”
• combat public waste»Offentligt slöseri i alla former ska bekämpas.« (party programme ↗)“Public waste in all forms must be combated.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

The plan requires clear results and clear citizen benefit for every public investment and wants to strengthen possibilities for accountability. Prompt follow-up and evaluation of the reform's consequences, including for groups not covered by the enhanced support, is a direct application of that requirement. The plan does not, however, address this reform itself, so the support is derived.

• results requirements on public investmentsdecisive»Begära tydliga resultat för varje offentlig satsning« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Require clear results for every public investment”
• citizen benefit should be demonstrated»Sverigedemokraterna vill koncentrera de offentliga utgifterna till välfärdens hjärta och begära tydlig medborgarnytta för alla satsningar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden Democrats want to concentrate public spending on the heart of the welfare state and require clear citizen benefit for all investments.”
• accountability»Sverigedemokraterna vill stärka möjligheter för ansvarsutkrävande när hanteringen av de offentliga resurserna brister.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden Democrats want to strengthen possibilities for accountability when the management of public resources is deficient.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.