2025-04-022024/25:MJU10 · p.2MJUEnvironment & agriculture
Reference Prices for Veterinary Care
What's at stake: The cost of veterinary care has risen sharply in recent years, and more pet owners risk struggling to pay, especially for emergency care. Reference prices would make it easier to compare clinics and plan for costs, affecting the many households that own a dog or cat.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the state should produce and regulate reference prices for veterinary care to make costs more predictable, or whether the committee - which prefers to wait for an ongoing review of price transparency - should reject the motions.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee rejects the motions for reference prices for veterinary care. It welcomes the government's move to task the Swedish Competition Authority with mapping price transparency in the veterinary market, and prefers to await the results of that work before considering further measures.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 2 (V)
The reservation (V) wants the state to take greater responsibility for regulating prices in veterinary care through a reference price list, pointing to sharply rising costs, poor price transparency and the risk that pet owners forgo care they cannot afford.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 2 by V.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | No 0/20/0/4 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| S | No | Abstain 0/1/92/13 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| MP | No | Yes 16/0/0/2 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| C | Yes | Yes 20/0/0/4 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| L | Yes | Yes 13/0/0/3 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| KD | Yes | Yes 17/0/0/2 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| M | Yes | Yes 60/0/0/8 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| SD | No | Yes 62/0/0/10 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
Broke with the party line
| SLouise Thunström (S, Västra Götalands läns norra) | No — party line: Abstain |
MPs whose vote differs from their party's majority position in this division. Marked with a dark ring in the chamber view.
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2024/25:195 by Andreas Lennkvist Manriquez et al. (V) demand 21, 2024/25:1397 by Martin Kinnunen et al. (SD) demand 23 and 2024/25:3108 by Anna-Caren Sätherberg et al. (S) demand 47.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2024/25:195 av Andreas Lennkvist Manriquez m.fl. (V) yrkande 21, 2024/25:1397 av Martin Kinnunen m.fl. (SD) yrkande 23 och 2024/25:3108 av Anna-Caren Sätherberg m.fl. (S) yrkande 47.
Riksdag decision: Veterinary care should get better conditions to conduct its business. The Riksdag said yes to the government's proposal, which involves changes for activities offering health and medical care for animals. The purpose is to ensure long-term well-functioning health and medical care for animals. Supervision of animal health care will be expanded; today supervision only applies to the person performing animal treatment. The proposal means that supervision now also applies to the person conducting an activity where animal health personnel work. Today, animal care workers do not form part of the animal health personnel. Given that demand for veterinary care has greatly increased, animal care workers will be able to be approved and thus join the animal health personnel. Another regulatory change concerns making it easier for foreign veterinarians to work in Sweden. The new regulations will come into effect on 1 September 2025, except for the changes concerning qualifications for animal care workers, which will instead come into effect on 1 September 2030. The Riksdag also decided to direct a formal request to the government to protect and develop Swedish grazing rights.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants the government to investigate how a reference price list for veterinary care can be designed and regulated. (V) — Reservation 2
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan gives the state an explicit role in keeping companies' pricing at a reasonable level and sees joint ownership as a tool in markets with excess profits and poor terms.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan gives the state an explicit role in keeping companies' pricing at a reasonable level and sees joint ownership as a tool in markets with excess profits and poor terms. Reference prices for veterinary care are exactly such a state framework for a market where prices skyrocket. That animals shall be able to live good lives also presupposes that owners do not forgo care for economic reasons.
Original (Swedish)
Planen ger staten en uttrycklig roll i att hålla företagens prissättning på en rimlig nivå och ser gemensamt ägande som ett verktyg på marknader med övervinster och dåliga villkor. Referenspriser för veterinärvård är just en sådan statlig ram för en marknad där priserna skenar. Att djur ska kunna leva goda liv förutsätter också att ägare inte avstår vård av ekonomiska skäl.
- state price influencedecisive»Staten kan också spela viktiga roller för att hålla företagens prissättning på en rimlig nivå.« (party programme ↗)“The state can also play important roles in keeping companies' pricing at a reasonable level.”
- counteract excess profits»På marknader som präglas av övervinster eller dåliga avtalsvillkor kan gemensamt ägda företag sätta tryck genom att erbjuda bättre villkor.« (party programme ↗)“In markets characterized by excess profits or poor contract terms, jointly owned companies can exert pressure by offering better terms.”
- animals are sentient beings»All djurhållning ska utgå från att djur är kännande varelser som ska leva goda liv.« (party programme ↗)“All animal husbandry shall be based on the understanding that animals are sentient beings that should live good lives.”
- public framework for private companies»är ett bra exempel på hur vi genom gemensamt ägande kan ta ansvar för komplexa problem och sätta en genomtänkt ram för privata« (party programme ↗)“is a good example of how through joint ownership we can take responsibility for complex problems and set a thoughtful framework for private”
The documents say nothing about veterinary care or reference pricing.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The documents say nothing about veterinary care or reference pricing. The closest underlying principle is that democracy has the paramount right to set conditions and parameters for the economy and that regulation is needed where the market does not maintain competition and price transparency. On the basis of that principle, and the explicit commitment to support households hit by steep price increases, a state responsibility for price regulation lies closer to the plan than a withdrawal.
Original (Swedish)
Dokumenten säger ingenting om veterinärvård eller referenspriser. Närmast liggande princip är att demokratin har den överordnade rätten att ange villkor och ramar för ekonomin och att reglering behövs där marknaden inte upprätthåller konkurrens och pristransparens. Utifrån den principen, och åtagandet att stötta hushåll som drabbas av kraftiga prisökningar, ligger ett statligt ansvar för prisreglering närmare planen än ett avstående.
- democracy before the marketdecisive»den överordnade rätten att ange villkor och ramar för ekonomin.« (party programme ↗)“the paramount right to set conditions and parameters for the economy.”
- regulation against monopoly»kan upprätthålla konkurrensen och bryta utvecklingen mot privata monopol.« (party programme ↗)“can maintain competition and break the development toward private monopolies.”
- support against price increases»Stöd till de som drabbas hårdast av prisökningarna.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Support for those hardest hit by price increases.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan says nothing about prices or pricing within veterinary care.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan says nothing about prices or pricing within veterinary care. The closest underlying principle is that animals have intrinsic value and the right to be spared suffering, which speaks for measures making pet owners not forced to forgo care, and the plan's general requirement for strong consumer protection with price transparency. The position is therefore uncertain and derived from general principles.
Original (Swedish)
Planen säger ingenting om priser eller prissättning inom veterinärvården. Närmast liggande princip är att djur har ett egenvärde och rätt att slippa lidande, vilket talar för åtgärder som gör att djurägare inte tvingas avstå vård, samt planens allmänna krav på ett starkt konsumentskydd med pristransparens. Ställningstagandet är därför osäkert och härlett ur allmänna principer.
- animals' intrinsic valuedecisive»Alla djur har ett egenvärde oavsett deras nyttighet« (party programme ↗)“All animals have intrinsic value regardless of their usefulness”
- strong consumer protection»för konsumenterna genom god konsumentvägledning, tydlig märkning av varor och tjänster och« (party programme ↗)“for consumers through good consumer guidance, clear labeling of goods and services and”
- high animal welfare»Miljöpartiet kräver ett verkligt djurskydd, en hög djurvälfärd och stopp för onödiga djurförsök.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Green Party requires genuine animal protection, high animal welfare and a halt to unnecessary animal testing.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan's answer to high prices is explicitly freer markets and better competition, not state price setting.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's answer to high prices is explicitly freer markets and better competition, not state price setting. The counter-proposal wants the state to regulate prices in veterinary care through a reference price list, which is precisely the kind of command-economy directive the plan distances itself from. The problem of poor price transparency should, according to the plan's principles, be solved by allowing market mechanisms to work. Therefore, the plan rejects the requirement.
Original (Swedish)
Planens svar på höga priser är uttryckligen friare marknader och bättre konkurrens, inte statlig prissättning. Motförslaget vill att staten reglerar priserna inom djurvården genom en referensprislista, vilket är just den sorts planekonomiska pekpinne planen tar avstånd från. Problemet med dålig pristransparens ska enligt planens principer lösas genom att marknadsmekanismerna får verka. Därför avvisar planen kravet.
- freer markets dampen pricesdecisive»Genom att skapa friare marknader och förbättra konkurrensen kan vi dämpa priserna ytterligare.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“By creating freer markets and improving competition we can further dampen prices.”
- competition over price regulation»Konkurrens är en viktig drivkraft för utvecklingen av marknadsekonomin.« (party programme ↗)“Competition is an important driver of the development of the market economy.”
flags: citat_blockerat
The plan is built on economic freedom and believes consumer power shall be secured through strong competition legislation and right to correct product information, not through state-set prices.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan is built on economic freedom and believes consumer power shall be secured through strong competition legislation and right to correct product information, not through state-set prices. The market shall be regulated to maintain healthy competition – not through reference price lists. The counter-proposal's demand for state price regulation in animal care therefore conflicts with the plan, despite the plan cherishing animal welfare.
Original (Swedish)
Planen bygger på ekonomisk frihet och anser att konsumentmakten ska säkras genom stark konkurrenslagstiftning och rätt till korrekt produktinformation, inte genom statligt satta priser. Marknaden ska regleras för att upprätthålla sund konkurrens – inte genom referensprislistor. Motförslagets krav på statlig prisreglering i djurvården strider därför mot planen, trots att planen värnar djurens välfärd.
- competition and price informationdecisive»Därför behövs en stark konkurrenslagstiftning och konsumentlagar som ger rätt till korrekt« (party programme ↗)“Therefore strong competition legislation and consumer laws are needed that give the right to correct”
- healthy competition as a tool»upprätthålla en sund konkurrens.« (party programme ↗)“maintain healthy competition.”
- economic freedom»Det liberala samhället förutsätter ekonomisk frihet.« (party programme ↗)“The liberal society presupposes economic freedom.”
- responsibility for animals»Hur vi hanterar våra djur är ett mått på vår civilisation och en förutsättning för en god folkhälsa.« (party programme ↗)“How we treat our animals is a measure of our civilisation and a prerequisite for good public health.”
The plan is based on market economy as a method and allows competition restrictions only in exceptional cases, for example for public health reasons.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan is based on market economy as a method and allows competition restrictions only in exceptional cases, for example for public health reasons. State price regulation of animal care through reference price list is such a restriction without support in the plan. The plan's answer to poor price transparency is instead well-developed consumer information, even though responsibility for the animals speaks for taking the cost problem seriously.
Original (Swedish)
Planen bygger på marknadsekonomin som metod och tillåter konkurrensbegränsningar bara undantagsvis, exempelvis av folkhälsoskäl. Statlig prisreglering av djurvården genom referensprislista är en sådan begränsning utan stöd i planen. Planens svar på dålig pristransparens är i stället väl utbyggd konsumentinformation, även om ansvaret för djuren talar för att kostnadsproblemet tas på allvar.
- market economy as a methoddecisive»Den historiska erfarenheten visar att marknadsekonomin är den bästa metoden för att skapa en god« (party programme ↗)“Historical experience shows that market economy is the best method for creating good”
- exceptional competition restriction»Monopol och konkurrensbegränsningar får endast förekomma undantagsvis,« (party programme ↗)“Monopolies and competition restrictions may only occur exceptionally,”
- consumer information necessary»En väl utbyggd konsumentinformation« (party programme ↗)“Well-developed consumer information”
- responsibility for animals»Människan har ett ansvar att värna andra levande« (party programme ↗)“Humanity has a responsibility to care for other living”
The counter-proposal requires the state to regulate prices in veterinary care through a reference price list.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The counter-proposal requires the state to regulate prices in veterinary care through a reference price list. The plan's principles speak against this: prosperity rests on a market economy and private ownership, government intervention is rarely the solution and politics lacks the capacity to detail-manage such a complicated process as price formation. The plan wants instead to have a free business sector. Therefore the plan rejects the demand.
Original (Swedish)
Motförslaget kräver att staten reglerar priserna inom djurvården genom en referensprislista. Planens principer talar emot: välståndet vilar på marknadsekonomi och enskilt ägande, statliga ingripanden är sällan lösningen och politiken saknar förmåga att detaljstyra en så komplicerad process som prisbildning. Planen vill i stället ha ett fritt näringsliv. Därför avvisar planen kravet.
- market economy as foundationdecisive»Grunden för Sveriges välstånd är en marknadsekonomi baserad« (party programme ↗)“The foundation for Sweden's prosperity is a market economy based”
- government intervention rarely the solution»Statliga ingripanden är långt ifrån alltid« (party programme ↗)“Government intervention is far from always”
- politics shall not detail-manage»att detaljstyra och överpröva en så komplicerad process.« (party programme ↗)“to detail-manage and review such a complicated process.”
- free enterprise»Moderaterna vill bygga ett land där ett fritt näringsliv skapar ett välstånd som kommer alla till del.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Moderates want to build a country where a free business sector creates prosperity that benefits everyone.”
The plan wants strengthened animal protection with greater respect for animals' natural behaviour and strives for a society where no animals are subjected to unnecessary suffering; animal owners refraining from care they cannot afford counteracts that goal.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants strengthened animal protection with greater respect for animals' natural behaviour and strives for a society where no animals are subjected to unnecessary suffering; animal owners refraining from care they cannot afford counteracts that goal. The plan also accepts a responsible, regulated market economy, which provides room for state price control in an area with weak price transparency. The plan, however, does not address veterinary prices, so the conclusion is inferred.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill ha ett stärkt djurskydd med större hänsyn till djurens naturliga beteende och strävar efter ett samhälle där inga djur utsätts för onödigt lidande; att djurägare avstår från vård de inte har råd med motverkar det målet. Planen accepterar också en ansvarsfull, reglerad marknadsekonomi, vilket ger utrymme för statlig prisstyrning på ett område med svag pristransparens. Planen behandlar dock inte veterinärpriser, så slutsatsen är härledd.
- strengthened animal protectiondecisive»Sverigedemokraterna vill ha ett stärkt djurskydd där större hänsyn tas till djurens naturliga beteende.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden Democrats want strengthened animal protection where greater respect is taken for animals' natural behaviour.”
- no unnecessary animal suffering»Vi ser omsorgen om djuren som ett mått på hur utvecklat ett samhälle är och strävar« (party programme ↗)“We see care for animals as a measure of how developed a society is and strive”
- regulated market economy»reglerad marknadsekonomi, byggd på långsiktigt tänkande, är för oss självklar.« (party programme ↗)“regulated market economy, built on long-term thinking, is self-evident to us.”
- animals' legal status»Stärka djurs rättsliga skydd och status« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strengthen animals' legal protection and status”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2024/25:MJU10)
- Committee report full text (HC01MJU10)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2024/25:1020 — Ny djurskötarutbildning av Kerstin Lundgren (C)
- Motion 2024/25:1024 — Små slakterier av Anders W Jonsson (C)
- Motion 2024/25:1308 — Myndighet och minister för djurskydd av Rebecka Le Moine m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2024/25:1373 — Livsmedel av Martin Kinnunen m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1395 — Jordbruk - ökad konkurrenskraft utan förlust av biologisk mångfald av Martin Kinnunen m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1397 — Djurskydd av Martin Kinnunen m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1533 — Fler veterinärer i Sverige av Alexandra Anstrell m.fl. (M)
- Motion 2024/25:1750 — Utfasning av turbokycklingar av Rebecka Le Moine m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2024/25:1751 — Förbud mot avlivning av hankycklingar av Rebecka Le Moine m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2024/25:1752 — Förbud mot burhållning av hönor av Rebecka Le Moine m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2024/25:1770 — Betesrätten av Rebecka Le Moine m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2024/25:195 — Konsumenträtt av Andreas Lennkvist Manriquez m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2024/25:1983 — Trygga köp av hundburar av Ann-Sofie Alm (M)
- Motion 2024/25:2129 — Grisars rätt till ett värdigt liv av Sanna Backeskog m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2024/25:215 — Omhändertagande av djur som far illa av Lina Nordquist (L)
- Motion 2024/25:2291 — Förbud mot särskilt farliga hundraser av Fredrik Kärrholm (M)
- Motion 2024/25:234 — Förbud mot halal- och koscherslakt av Richard Jomshof (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:2484 — Virtuella stängsel av Stina Larsson och Helena Vilhelmsson (båda C)
- Motion 2024/25:2536 — Djurtillsyn av Jan Ericson (M)
- Motion 2024/25:2599 — Tillträde till bostäder i djurskyddsärenden av Jan Ericson (M)
Source: The Swedish Parliament