2026-03-252025/26:FiU34 · p.4FiUEconomy & finance
Environmental requirements
Environmental requirements in public procurement
What's at stake: How public procurement is used to set environmental and climate requirements affects the pace of the shift to climate-smart materials and circular products, for example in construction, furniture and textiles, as well as which suppliers can compete for contracts.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether stricter or new environmental requirements are needed in public procurement, for example mandatory climate and circularity criteria, or whether the existing options to set environmental requirements together with upcoming EU regulation are sufficient.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee notes that current legislation already allows environmental, climate and social criteria to be set in procurement as long as the requirement is clearly linked to what is being procured and can be followed up, and points to the EU's ecodesign, battery, net-zero technology, critical raw materials and packaging regulations, which will bring new mandatory environmental requirements to procurement. The committee rejects the motions given this ongoing work.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 6 (C)
The reservation (C) wants public procurement used as a more powerful tool for lower climate emissions: a floor of baseline sustainability requirements in state procurement, a growing share of advanced and cutting-edge requirements, targeted efforts to push through climate-smart materials such as cement, procurement of biojet fuel matching the state aircraft fleet's needs, and gradually tightened circularity requirements, especially for furniture, textiles and interior products.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 6 by C.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have held
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: KDKristdemokraterna
Ja 242–17Ja 225–34
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Abstain 0/0/19/3 | differs | confidence: high | explicit |
| S | No | Yes 92/0/0/14 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| MP | No | Abstain 0/0/15/3 | differs | confidence: high | explicit |
| C | No | No 0/17/0/7 | match | confidence: low | not addressed |
| L | No | Yes 14/0/0/2 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| KD | No | Yes 17/0/0/2 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: medium | explicit |
| M | Yes | Yes 59/0/0/9 | match | confidence: medium | derived |
| SD | Yes | Yes 57/0/0/13 | match | confidence: high | not addressed |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2025/26:2752 by Mathias Tegnér et al. (S) claim 2, 2025/26:2789 by Nooshi Dadgostar et al. (V) claim 5, 2025/26:2796 by Mathias Tegnér (S) claims 4 and 5, 2025/26:3282 by Katarina Luhr et al. (MP) claims 19 and 20, 2025/26:3411 by Jacob Risberg et al. (MP) claim 28, 2025/26:3422 by Katarina Luhr et al. (MP) claims 17 and 208, 2025/26:3546 by Amanda Palmstierna et al. (MP) claims 2 and 3, and 2025/26:3582 by Rickard Nordin et al. (C) claims 40 and 43-45.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2025/26:2752 av Mathias Tegnér m.fl. (S) yrkande 2, 2025/26:2789 av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V) yrkande 5, 2025/26:2796 av Mathias Tegnér (S) yrkandena 4 och 5, 2025/26:3282 av Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP) yrkandena 19 och 20, 2025/26:3411 av Jacob Risberg m.fl. (MP) yrkande 28, 2025/26:3422 av Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP) yrkandena 17 och 208, 2025/26:3546 av Amanda Palmstierna m.fl. (MP) yrkandena 2 och 3 samt 2025/26:3582 av Rickard Nordin m.fl. (C) yrkandena 40 och 43-45.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag said no to 60 proposals on public procurement. The proposals were submitted during the general motion session 2025 and concern, among other things, the regulations and procedures for public procurement, environmental requirements and disreputable actors. The Riksdag refers to ongoing work in the areas raised by the proposers.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants the government to clarify the possibility of applying security-related procurement rules to healthcare and care services. (C) — Reservation 6
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan establishes that jointly owned activities' procurement of goods and services is an important strategic tool for implementing socio-economically significant changes and establishing standards.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that jointly owned activities' procurement of goods and services is an important strategic tool for implementing socio-economically significant changes and establishing standards. It also requires that all political decisions take into account the climate crisis and that recycling increases. Stricter base requirements, climate-smart materials and increased circularity in state procurement are exactly the use of procurement that the plan advocates.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att gemensamt ägda verksamheters inköp av varor och tjänster är ett viktigt strategiskt verktyg för att genomföra samhällsekonomiskt betydelsefulla skiften och etablera standarder. Den kräver också att alla politiska beslut tar hänsyn till klimatkrisen och att återvinningen ökar. Skärpta baskrav, klimatsmarta material och ökad cirkularitet vid statlig upphandling är precis den användningen av upphandling som planen förordar.
- public procurement as a policy instrumentdecisive»också i privata företag. Deras inköp av varor och tjänster är ett viktigt« (party programme ↗)“also in private companies. Their procurement of goods and services is important”
- jointly owned drive change»Gemensamt ägda verksamheter kan användas för att driva förändring« (party programme ↗)“Jointly owned activities can be used to drive change”
- all decisions should be climate-tested»Omställningen behöver ske omgående och alla politiska beslut behöver ta hänsyn till den akuta kris som vi befinner oss i.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The transition needs to happen immediately and all political decisions need to take the acute crisis we are in into account.”
- increased circularity»Återanvändning och återvinning av material behöver öka.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Reuse and recycling of materials need to increase.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan demands a climate perspective in all decisions and that Sweden should become the world's first fossil-free welfare state, and that those with the greatest opportunity to transition go first.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan demands a climate perspective in all decisions and that Sweden should become the world's first fossil-free welfare state, and that those with the greatest opportunity to transition go first. The state as a purchaser is then an obvious tool, and tightened sustainability and circularity requirements are in line with the goal of a circular economy. The plan therefore supports the counter-proposal's requirement.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver ett klimatperspektiv i alla beslut och att Sverige ska bli världens första fossilfria välfärdsnation, samt att de som har störst möjlighet att ställa om går före. Staten som upphandlare är då ett självklart verktyg, och skärpta hållbarhets- och cirkularitetskrav ligger i linje med målet om en cirkulär ekonomi. Planen stöder därför motförslagets krav.
- climate perspective in all decisionsdecisive»Klimatperspektiv på alla nivåer av beslut och beslutsfattande.« (party programme ↗)“Climate perspective at all levels of decision and decision-making.”
- fossil-free welfare state»Sverige ska bli världens första fossilfria välfärdsnation.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden shall become the world's first fossil-free welfare state.”
- circular economy»Omställning till cirkulär ekonomi, för bättre användning av befintliga resurser.« (party programme ↗)“Transition to a circular economy, for better use of existing resources.”
- those who can go first»De som har större möjligheter att ställa om går före och tar större ansvar.« (party programme ↗)“Those with greater opportunities to transition go first and take greater responsibility.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The party programme explicitly requires that clearer sustainability requirements be set in public procurement and that shared resources be used to stimulate climate transition.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme explicitly requires that clearer sustainability requirements be set in public procurement and that shared resources be used to stimulate climate transition. The counter-proposal's basic requirements, increasing proportion of advanced requirements and stepwise strengthened circularity requirements are precisely the use of procurement that the plan specifies. The plan furthermore wants to drive the transition to a circular economy with clear rules and accelerate the shift to renewable aviation fuels.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet kräver uttryckligen att tydligare hållbarhetskrav ställs vid offentlig upphandling och att gemensamma resurser används för att stimulera klimatomställning. Motförslagets baskrav, ökande andel avancerade krav och stegvis skärpta cirkularitetskrav är precis den användning av upphandling som planen anger. Planen vill dessutom med tydliga regler driva på övergången till en cirkulär ekonomi och skynda på omställningen till förnybara flygbränslen.
- strengthened sustainability requirementsdecisive»Vid offentlig upphandling ska det ställas tydligare hållbarhetskrav.« (party programme ↗)“In public procurement, clearer sustainability requirements should be set.”
- instruments for circularity»Det är en politisk uppgift att med ekonomiska styrmedel och tydliga regler driva på omställningen till en resurseffektiv och cirkulär ekonomi.« (party programme ↗)“It is a political task to drive the transition to a resource-efficient and circular economy using economic instruments and clear rules.”
- renewable aviation fuels»minska flygets utsläpp — höja flygskatten, minska flygresandet och skynda på omställningen till förnybara bränslen, elektrobränslen och elflyg för de flygresor som inte kan ersättas på annat sätt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“reduce aviation emissions — raise aviation tax, reduce air travel and accelerate the shift to renewable fuels, electrofuels and electric aviation for the flights that cannot be replaced in other ways.”
- rapid industrial transition»införa en omställningslag så att all industri fasar ut kol, olja och fossilgas till senast 2030.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“introduce a transition law so that all industry phases out coal, oil and fossil gas by no later than 2030.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan wants to make Sweden the world's most resource-efficient country with a more circular economy and is prepared to make stricter demands on environment and climate in agreements.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to make Sweden the world's most resource-efficient country with a more circular economy and is prepared to make stricter demands on environment and climate in agreements. Tightened sustainability and circularity requirements in government procurement is one way to make it cost more to pollute. At the same time, the plan warns against symbolic politics, which makes the conclusion uncertain.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill göra Sverige till världens mest resurseffektiva land med en mer cirkulär ekonomi och är beredd att ställa hårdare krav på miljö och klimat i avtal. Skärpta hållbarhets- och cirkularitetskrav vid statlig upphandling är ett sätt att låta det kosta mer att smutsa ner. Samtidigt varnar planen för symbolpolitik, vilket gör slutsatsen osäker.
- circular economydecisive»Sverige ska bli världens mest resurseffektiva land och ekonomin mer cirkulär.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden shall become the world's most resource-efficient country and the economy more circular.”
- stricter environmental demands in agreements»Ställ hårdare krav på arbetsvillkor, miljö och klimat i handelsavtal.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Make stricter demands on working conditions, environment and climate in trade agreements.”
- the polluter pays»Det ska kosta mer att smutsa ner.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It should cost more to pollute.”
- effective measures above symbolic politics»Ett ledarskap som prioriterar effektiva åtgärder framför symbolpolitik eller passivitet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“A leadership that prioritizes effective measures above symbolic politics or passivity.”
The party programme explicitly establishes that clear environmental, climate, and health protection requirements should be able to be set in public procurement and that long-term sustainable products should be able to be prioritized.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme explicitly establishes that clear environmental, climate, and health protection requirements should be able to be set in public procurement and that long-term sustainable products should be able to be prioritized. The counter-proposal's basic requirements for sustainability, tightened circularity requirements, and procurement of fossil-free aviation fuel are applications of that commitment, in line with the goal that raw materials should circulate. The plan's requirements for low costs and competition set the frame but do not argue against the requirements in substance.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet slår uttryckligen fast att tydliga miljö-, klimat- och hälsoskyddskrav ska kunna ställas vid offentlig upphandling och att långsiktigt hållbara produkter ska kunna premieras. Motförslagets baskrav på hållbarhet, skärpta cirkularitetskrav och upphandling av fossilfritt flygbränsle är tillämpningar av det åtagandet, i linje med målet att råvaror ska cirkulera. Planens krav på låga kostnader och konkurrens sätter ramen men talar inte emot kraven i sak.
- environmental requirements in procurementdecisive»Vid offentlig upphandling ska tydliga miljö-, klimat- och hälsoskyddskrav kunna ställas och långsiktigt hållbara produkter kunna premieras.« (party programme ↗)“In public procurement, clear environmental, climate, and health protection requirements should be able to be set and long-term sustainable products should be able to be prioritized.”
- circular material flows»Målet ska vara att alla grundläggande råvaror, såsom växtnäring och mineraler, ska cirkulera i produktionssystemet« (party programme ↗)“The goal should be that all basic raw materials, such as nutrients and minerals, should circulate in the production system”
- fossil-free air travel»Fler flygresor ska göras fossilfria« (2022 manifesto ↗)“More air trips should be made fossil-free”
- cost-effective procurement»Offentlig upphandling ska ske på sätt som ger skattebetalarna låga kostnader, hög kvalitet, säkrar likabehandling och stimulerar konkurrens.« (party programme ↗)“Public procurement should take place in ways that give taxpayers low costs, high quality, ensure equal treatment, and stimulate competition.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The party programme explicitly identifies environmentally friendly procurement as a strategic instrument that shall be used, together with the substitution principle and the principle that the polluter pays.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme explicitly identifies environmentally friendly procurement as a strategic instrument that shall be used, together with the substitution principle and the principle that the polluter pays. Tightened sustainability and circularity requirements in government procurement are precisely such a policy instrument. That the requirements shall be verifiable and coordinated with EU regulations does not contradict this.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet pekar uttryckligen ut miljövänlig upphandling som ett strategiskt instrument som ska användas, tillsammans med substitutionsprincipen och principen att förorenaren betalar. Skärpta hållbarhets- och cirkularitetskrav vid statlig upphandling är just ett sådant styrmedel. Att kraven ska vara uppföljningsbara och samordnade med EU-regelverk motsäger inte detta.
- environmentally friendly procurement as a policy instrumentdecisive»skattepolitik, miljöledningssystem och miljövänlig upphandling« (party programme ↗)“tax policy, environmental management systems and environmentally friendly procurement”
- the substitution principle»Substitutionsprincipen, som innebär att mindre farliga ämnen« (party programme ↗)“The substitution principle, which means that less hazardous substances”
- the polluter pays»principen att förorenaren ska betala« (party programme ↗)“the principle that the polluter shall pay”
- the EU as an environmental arena»Då miljöproblemen är gränsöverskridande till sin natur är EU i många fall den mest lämpliga« (party programme ↗)“Since environmental problems are cross-border in nature, the EU in many cases is the most appropriate”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan wants to counteract over-implementation and implement EU rules at minimum level and significantly reduce regulatory red tape, which speaks against a floor of mandatory basic requirements and gradually tightened circularity requirements in government procurement.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to counteract over-implementation and implement EU rules at minimum level and significantly reduce regulatory red tape, which speaks against a floor of mandatory basic requirements and gradually tightened circularity requirements in government procurement. The plan also believes that emission reductions should be pursued where they are cheapest and warns against expensive symbolic politics. Support for biofuels is in the plan, but as a production initiative – not as a procurement requirement.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill motverka överimplementering och genomföra EU-regler på miniminivå samt kraftigt minska regelkrånglet, vilket talar emot ett golv av obligatoriska baskrav och stegvis skärpta cirkularitetskrav i statlig upphandling. Planen anser dessutom att utsläppsminskningar bör sökas där de är billigast och varnar för dyrbar symbolpolitik. Stödet till biodrivmedel finns i planen, men som produktionssatsning – inte som upphandlingskrav.
- EU rules at minimum leveldecisive»Minska regelkrånglet och onödig byråkrati, bland annat genom att motverka överimplementering i Sverige av EU-beslut« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Reduce regulatory red tape and unnecessary bureaucracy, including by counteracting over-implementation in Sweden of EU decisions”
- cost-effective climate policy»Samtidigt är kostnaden för att minska utsläppen genom internationella klimatinsatser ofta mycket lägre än för att minska utsläppen i Sverige – därför kommer Moderaterna också att rikta om biståndet för att minska utsläppen i andra länder.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“However, the cost of reducing emissions through international climate initiatives is often much lower than reducing emissions in Sweden – therefore Moderates will also redirect aid to reduce emissions in other countries.”
- no to expensive symbolic politics»Klimatpolitiken får aldrig reduceras till dyrbar symbolpolitik eller snäv klimatnationalism.« (party programme ↗)“Climate policy must never be reduced to expensive symbolic politics or narrow climate nationalism.”
- biofuels via production support»Satsa på tillverkning av biodrivmedel« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Invest in the manufacture of biofuels”
The plan explicitly warns that unnecessarily strict procurement conditions exclude smaller actors and wants to stop symbolic politics that is detrimental to industry.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan explicitly warns that unnecessarily strict procurement conditions exclude smaller actors and wants to stop symbolic politics that is detrimental to industry. The counter-proposal's demands for mandatory minimum requirements, gradually tightened circularity and material requirements and procured biofuels for aviation are precisely such a tightening of the requirements framework. The plan's environmental line is furthermore to seek the most environmental benefit per krona rather than more rules, and it wants to reduce the use of expensive biofuels.
Original (Swedish)
Planen varnar uttryckligen för att onödigt stränga villkor i upphandlingar stänger ute mindre aktörer och vill stoppa symbolpolitik som går ut över industrin. Motförslagets krav på obligatoriska baskrav, stegvis skärpta cirkularitets- och materialkrav samt upphandlat biobränsle till flyget är precis en sådan skärpning av kravbilden. Planens miljölinje är dessutom att söka mest miljönytta per krona snarare än fler regler, och den vill minska användningen av dyra biodrivmedel.
- against strict procurement requirementsdecisive»Onödigt stränga villkor i branschstandarder och i upphandlingar gör det ofta svårt för mindre aktörer att slå sig in på marknaden.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Unnecessarily strict requirements in industry standards and in procurement often make it difficult for smaller actors to enter the market.”
- stop symbolic politics»Stoppa symbolpolitik som går ut över möjligheten att bedriva industri och näring« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Stop symbolic politics that is detrimental to the ability to conduct industry and business”
- cost-effective environmental policy»Sträva efter miljöeffektivitet och hitta de åtgärder som ger mest miljö per krona« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strive for environmental efficiency and find the measures that deliver the most environmental benefit per krona”
- against expensive biofuels»Minska användningen av miljöskadliga och dyra biodrivmedel från utlandet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Reduce the use of environmentally harmful and expensive biofuels from abroad”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2025/26:FiU34)
- Committee report full text (HD01FiU34)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2025/26:1068 — Stärkt skydd för kvinnor och barn som lämnar våldsamma män av Carina Ödebrink m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1294 — LOUFB - föreningslivets svar på LOU av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1534 — Lagen om offentlig upphandling (LOU) efter svenska behov och förutsättningar av Emma Ahlström Köster m.fl. (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2154 — Stärk de mindre företagen vid offentlig upphandling av Sten Bergheden (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2299 — Begränsat antal led av underentreprenörer av Zara Leghissa m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:2326 — Förenklingar i lagen om offentlig upphandling av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2369 — Kina av Håkan Svenneling m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2025/26:2388 — Förändringar i lagen om offentlig upphandling av Markus Wiechel (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:2522 — Offentlig upphandling och nyttjanderätten av Ann-Charlotte Hammar Johnsson och Malin Höglund (båda M)
- Motion 2025/26:2752 — Om offentlig upphandling och grön innovation av Mathias Tegnér m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:2775 — Hyresrätt och allmännytta av Malcolm Momodou Jallow m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2025/26:2789 — Klimatet av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2025/26:2796 — Om grön tillväxt och gröna investeringar av Mathias Tegnér (S)
- Motion 2025/26:3064 — Översyn av lagen om offentlig upphandling (LOU) av Malin Höglund och Crister Carlsson (båda M)
- Motion 2025/26:307 — Ordning och reda på arbetsmarknaden av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2025/26:3179 — En tillgänglig vård och omsorg i hela landet av Christofer Bergenblock m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2025/26:3282 — Ett grönt och konkurrenskraftigt näringsliv under omställning av Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2025/26:3411 — Kina - mänskliga rättigheter, miljö och geopolitik av Jacob Risberg m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2025/26:3422 — En grön klimathandlingsplan 2026 av Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2025/26:3546 — Klimatmål och åtgärder för minskade utsläpp från konsumtion av Amanda Palmstierna m.fl. (MP)
Source: The Swedish Parliament