2026-04-152025/26:NU17 · p.1NUBusiness & energy
General electricity market issues
Development of the electricity market, electricity prices, and the state's role in power supply
What's at stake: The decision affects how much households and businesses pay for electricity and how evenly prices are distributed across different parts of the country. State intervention with fixed low-price contracts would give many households more predictable electricity costs, but also means a new role for the state in the electricity market.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the state should actively intervene to even out and lower electricity prices, including by procuring fossil-free electricity for households at a fixed low price, or whether the current energy-policy direction toward electrification and industrial climate transition should remain unchanged without such new state intervention.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee considers that parliament should not take initiatives that run counter to the established direction of energy policy, which would be the result if certain motions were approved. The committee points to the fact that the government's energy-policy direction and the planning target for the power system aim to create conditions for the electrification of industry and the climate transition, and that a special investigator has recently been tasked with analysing how the electricity market can be developed and regulated. The committee therefore rejects the motions.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 1 (S)
The reservation (S) wants the state to take greater responsibility for power supply through a system of so-called 'people's home electricity', where the state procures fossil-free electricity at the lowest possible price through auctions and offers it to households, covering around 60 percent of normal consumption. The reasoning is that today's large price differences between regions and periodically very high prices are unacceptable, and that such a model would give households stable, long-term low electricity prices.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 1 by S.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Abstain 0/0/18/4 | departs from the plan | confidence: high | explicit |
| S | No | No 0/91/0/15 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| MP | No | Abstain 0/0/15/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| C | Yes | Abstain 0/0/20/4 | departs from the plan | confidence: high | not addressed |
| L | Yes | Yes 13/0/0/3 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| KD | Yes | Yes 16/0/0/3 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| M | Yes | Yes 56/0/0/10 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| SD | Yes | Yes 61/0/0/9 | follows the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
Committee proposal
Parliament rejects the motions 2025/26:349 by Lars Engsund (M) demands 2 and 3, 2025/26:517 by Anders Alftberg and Robert Stenkvist (both SD), 2025/26:625 by Jamal El-Haj (-) demand 2, 2025/26:1447 by Ida Karkiainen et al. (S) demand 6, 2025/26:2656 by Cecilia Rönn (L), 2025/26:2669 by Lars Engsund (M) demand 1, 2025/26:2797 by Nooshi Dadgostar et al. (V) demands 1-3 and 5, 2025/26:3273 by Linus Lakso et al. (MP) demands 3, 6, 7 and 33, 2025/26:3422 by Katarina Luhr et al. (MP) demands 40 and 83-85, 2025/26:3582 by Rickard Nordin et al. (C) demands 94, 100, 103 and 104, 2025/26:3594 by Fredrik Olovsson et al. (S) demand 6 and 2025/26:3596 by Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist et al. (C) demands 14, 17 and 18.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2025/26:349 av Lars Engsund (M) yrkandena 2 och 3, 2025/26:517 av Anders Alftberg och Robert Stenkvist (båda SD), 2025/26:625 av Jamal El-Haj (-) yrkande 2, 2025/26:1447 av Ida Karkiainen m.fl. (S) yrkande 6, 2025/26:2656 av Cecilia Rönn (L), 2025/26:2669 av Lars Engsund (M) yrkande 1, 2025/26:2797 av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V) yrkandena 1-3 och 5, 2025/26:3273 av Linus Lakso m.fl. (MP) yrkandena 3, 6, 7 och 33, 2025/26:3422 av Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP) yrkandena 40 och 83-85, 2025/26:3582 av Rickard Nordin m.fl. (C) yrkandena 94, 100, 103 och 104, 2025/26:3594 av Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S) yrkande 6 och 2025/26:3596 av Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist m.fl. (C) yrkandena 14, 17 och 18.
Riksdag decision: Parliament rejected 132 proposals on electricity market issues in motions from the general motion period of 2025. The proposals deal with, among other things, general electricity market issues, grid development, electricity support, certain contract and fee issues, support and flexibility services, and energy communities. Parliament primarily refers to the policies pursued and ongoing work.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants Sweden to have the same low electricity prices and proposes a folkhemsel system where the state procures fossil-free electricity at the lowest possible price for households. (S) — Reservation 1
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan establishes that electricity and heat are infrastructure where investments and prices should be based on socio-economic goals, and that the public sector should take over responsibility for the power grid precisely to lower household costs.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that electricity and heat are infrastructure where investments and prices should be based on socio-economic goals, and that the public sector should take over responsibility for the power grid precisely to lower household costs. The counter-proposal's requirement that the state procures fossil-free electricity and offers it to households at stable low prices is the same intervention in market pricing. The plan also wants the state to increase its control over the infrastructure for the transition.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att el och värme är infrastruktur där investeringar och priser ska utgå från samhällsekonomiska mål, och att det offentliga ska ta över ansvaret för elnätet just för att sänka hushållens kostnader. Motförslagets krav att staten upphandlar fossilfri el och erbjuder den till hushållen till stabilt låga priser är samma ingrepp mot marknadsprissättningen. Planen vill dessutom att staten ökar sin kontroll över infrastrukturen för omställningen.
- public responsibility for the power griddecisive»Det offentliga ska ta över ansvaret för elnätet, vilket kommer leda till minskade avgifter för hushållen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The public sector shall take over responsibility for the power grid, which will lead to reduced charges for households.”
- electricity as societally governed infrastructure»Vi ser el och värme som en del av Sveriges infrastruktur, där investeringar och priser behöver utgå från samhällsekonomiska mål.« (party programme ↗)“We see electricity and heat as part of Sweden's infrastructure, where investments and prices need to be based on socio-economic goals.”
- state control over energy infrastructure»Staten måste öka sin kontroll över infrastruktur och resurser som behövs för att genomföra klimatomställningen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The state must increase its control over infrastructure and resources needed to carry out the climate transition.”
- the state presses down prices»Staten kan också spela viktiga roller för att hålla företagens prissättning på en rimlig nivå.« (party programme ↗)“The state can also play important roles in keeping companies' pricing at a reasonable level.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan demands low and fair energy prices throughout the country and states it is prepared to take further measures if prices remain high, with strengthened public interest in the governance of state enterprises.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan demands low and fair energy prices throughout the country and states it is prepared to take further measures if prices remain high, with strengthened public interest in the governance of state enterprises. State procurement of fossil-free electricity for households is one such measure against regional price differences. The plan's own primary path is, however, expanded electricity production rather than state electricity sales.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver låga och rättvisa energipriser i hela landet och förklarar sig beredd att göra ytterligare insatser om priserna förblir höga, med ett stärkt samhällsintresse i styrningen av statliga bolag. Statlig upphandling av fossilfri el till hushållen är en sådan insats mot prisskillnaderna mellan landsdelar. Planens egen huvudväg är dock utbyggd elproduktion snarare än statlig elförsäljning.
- low and fair electricity pricesdecisive»Låga och rättvisa energipriser i hela landet.« (party programme ↗)“Low and fair energy prices throughout the country.”
- readiness for further price measures»Vi är också beredda att göra ytterligare insatser vid fortsatt höga priser.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We are also prepared to take further measures if prices remain high.”
- expanded production pressures the price»Minska trycket på elpriserna genom en snabbt utbyggd elproduktion.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Reduce pressure on electricity prices through rapidly expanded electricity production.”
- public interest in state enterprises»Stärkt samhällsintresse i styrningen av de statliga bolagen.« (party programme ↗)“Strengthened public interest in the governance of state enterprises.”
Worldstate weighed in: Electricity price SE3 0.59 SEK/kWh and inflation 0.5 per cent — The price situation is dampened, which reduces the immediate cause but not the plan's goal of fair prices between regions.
The plan wants all energy to be fossil-free and that the electricity system delivers at low prices for households and businesses, and that the state sets regulations so that markets work for ordinary households.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants all energy to be fossil-free and that the electricity system delivers at low prices for households and businesses, and that the state sets regulations so that markets work for ordinary households. A public procurement of fossil-free electricity for households is in line with that, even though the plan does not specify such a model. The conclusion is therefore inferred and uncertain.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill att all energi ska vara fossilfri och att elsystemet levererar till låga priser för hushåll och företag, samt att staten sätter regelverk så att marknaderna fungerar för vanliga hushåll. En statlig upphandling av fossilfri el till hushållen ligger i linje med det, även om planen inte anger någon sådan modell. Slutsatsen är därför härledd och osäker.
- fossil-free electricity supplydecisive»Vår främsta prioritering är att all energi ska vara fossilfri.« (party programme ↗)“Our foremost priority is that all energy shall be fossil-free.”
- cheap sustainable alternatives»hållbara alternativen blir billigare och att det är lätt att göra rätt.« (party programme ↗)“sustainable alternatives become cheaper and that it is easy to do the right thing.”
- the state regulates the market»Staten ska säkerställa att det finns regelverk och institutioner som ser till att marknader« (party programme ↗)“The state shall ensure that there are regulations and institutions that see to it that markets”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan's answer to high and uneven electricity prices is more emission-free electricity, expanded electricity grid and freer markets and better competition that dampens prices — not that the state purchases and sells electricity to households.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's answer to high and uneven electricity prices is more emission-free electricity, expanded electricity grid and freer markets and better competition that dampens prices — not that the state purchases and sells electricity to households. The party programme explicitly requires a market economy free from command-economy directives. A state pricing model for household electricity therefore goes against the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planens svar på höga och ojämna elpriser är mer utsläppsfri el, utbyggt elnät samt friare marknader och bättre konkurrens som dämpar priserna — inte att staten upphandlar och säljer el till hushållen. Partiprogrammet kräver uttryckligen en marknadsekonomi fri från planekonomiska pekpinnar. En statlig prismodell för hushållens el går därför emot planen.
- competition dampens pricesdecisive»Genom att skapa friare marknader och förbättra konkurrensen kan vi dämpa priserna ytterligare.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“By creating freer markets and improving competition we can further dampen prices.”
- more electricity and stronger grid»Vi vill fördubbla produktionen av utsläppsfri el, och rusta och bygga ut elnätet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to double the production of emission-free electricity, and strengthen and expand the electricity grid.”
- competition as a driving force»Konkurrens är en viktig drivkraft för utvecklingen av marknadsekonomin.« (party programme ↗)“Competition is an important driver for the development of market economy.”
flags: citat_blockerat
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan wants to lower electricity prices through increased production, investments in the power system, and reduced electricity taxes, not by having the state procure and resell electricity to households.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to lower electricity prices through increased production, investments in the power system, and reduced electricity taxes, not by having the state procure and resell electricity to households. The party programme establishes that the public should only operate business activities in the case of strong public interest and not crowd out functioning private alternatives. The counter-proposal's model for state electricity sales therefore conflicts with the plan's line.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill sänka elpriserna genom mer produktion, investeringar i kraftsystemet och sänkta elskatter, inte genom att staten upphandlar och vidaresäljer el till hushållen. Partiprogrammet slår fast att det offentliga endast ska driva affärsverksamhet vid starkt samhällsintresse och inte tränga ut fungerande privata alternativ. Motförslagets modell för statlig elförsäljning strider därför mot planens linje.
- reduced electricity taxesdecisive»Vi vill både sänka elmomsen och den särskilda extraskatten på el för att mildra elprischocken här och nu.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want both to lower VAT on electricity and the special extra tax on electricity to mitigate the electricity price shock here and now.”
- limited state business activities»Det offentliga ska endast driva affärsverksamhet om det finns ett starkt samhällsintresse.« (party programme ↗)“The public should only operate business activities if there is a strong public interest.”
- no crowding out of the market»Det offentliga ska inte driva verksamheter som tränger ut fungerande privata alternativ eller försvårar nyföretagande.« (party programme ↗)“The public should not operate activities that crowd out functioning private alternatives or complicate new enterprise.”
- lower price through increased production»Ska vi få ner elpriserna krävs att vi bygger inte bara kärnkraft utan också mer sol- och vindkraft i hela landet, investerar i kraftsystemet och satsar på energilagring.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“To get electricity prices down, we need to build not just nuclear power but also more solar and wind power throughout the country, invest in the power system, and invest in energy storage.”
The plan requires that all good fossil-free power sources compete independently on an equal electricity market and sees an open market with increased competition as beneficial for customers.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that all good fossil-free power sources compete independently on an equal electricity market and sees an open market with increased competition as beneficial for customers. If the state auctions and sells electricity to households, that price formation would be removed from play. The plan meets high electricity prices with other means, including a shock absorber in the electricity tax and authorities' oversight of the market's functioning.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att alla goda fossilfria kraftslag får konkurrera självständigt på en jämlik elmarknad och ser en öppen marknad med ökad konkurrens som till nytta för kunderna. Att staten auktionerar upp och säljer el till hushållen skulle sätta denna prisbildning ur spel. Planen möter höga elpriser med andra medel, bland annat en stötdämpare i elskatten och myndigheternas uppsikt över marknadens funktionssätt.
- equal competition between power sourcesdecisive»Därför behöver alla goda fossilfria kraftslag ges förutsättningar att« (party programme ↗)“Therefore all good fossil-free power sources need to be given conditions to”
- open electricity market»och internationell energimarknad med ökad konkurrens är till nytta för kunderna.« (party programme ↗)“and international energy market with increased competition is beneficial for customers.”
- electricity tax as price dampener»Inför en “stötdämpare” i elskatten så att den sänks om elpriserna ökar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Introduce a "shock absorber" in the electricity tax so that it is lowered if electricity prices rise.”
- oversight of price formation»Prisbildningen och marknadens funktionssätt behöver samtidigt hållas under kontinuerlig« (party programme ↗)“Price formation and the market's functioning need at the same time be kept under continuous”
The plan's answer to high and uneven electricity prices is new nuclear power, investments in the electrical grid and a review of electricity price areas – not the state entering the market to purchase electricity and sell it on to households.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's answer to high and uneven electricity prices is new nuclear power, investments in the electrical grid and a review of electricity price areas – not the state entering the market to purchase electricity and sell it on to households. The state's role in the economy is, according to the plan, to safeguard the market's institutions and promote competition. The plan's household support is temporary high-cost protection in a crisis, not permanent state electricity trading.
Original (Swedish)
Planens svar på höga och ojämna elpriser är ny kärnkraft, investeringar i elnätet och en översyn av elprisområdena — inte att staten går in och upphandlar el och säljer den vidare till hushållen. Statens roll i ekonomin är enligt planen att värna marknadens institutioner och främja konkurrensen. Planens hushållsstöd är ett tillfälligt högkostnadsskydd i krisläge, inte en permanent statlig elhandel.
- nuclear power as solutiondecisive»Ny kärnkraft är lösningen för att reparera Sveriges energisystem på lång sikt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“New nuclear power is the solution to repair Sweden's energy system in the long term.”
- limited state role in the economy»Statens roll i ekonomin är att värna dess grundläggande« (party programme ↗)“The state's role in the economy is to safeguard its fundamental”
- address price differences»Se över elprisområdenas utformning« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Review the structure of electricity price areas”
- temporary crisis support to households»Skydda hushållen mot vinterns elräkningar genom ett högkostnadsskydd« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Protect households against winter electricity bills through high-cost protection”
The plan shares the goal of low and stable electricity prices for households, but directs other means: permanently lowered electricity energy tax and new nuclear power that provides reliable and cheap electricity.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan shares the goal of low and stable electricity prices for households, but directs other means: permanently lowered electricity energy tax and new nuclear power that provides reliable and cheap electricity. It simultaneously professes a responsible, regulated market economy. That the state procures and resells electricity to households is another and more interventionist means that the plan does not support.
Original (Swedish)
Planen delar målet om låga och stabila elpriser för hushållen, men anvisar andra medel: permanent sänkt skatt på elenergi och ny kärnkraft som ger pålitlig och billig el. Den bekänner sig samtidigt till en ansvarsfull, reglerad marknadsekonomi. Att staten upphandlar och vidaresäljer el till hushållen är ett annat och mer ingripande medel som planen inte ger stöd för.
- lower electricity price through tax reductiondecisive»Sänka skatten på elenergi permanent för att underlätta elektrifieringen« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Lower the tax on electricity energy permanently to facilitate electrification”
- cheap electricity through nuclear power»Säkra tillgången till pålitlig och billig el genom satsningar på framtidens kärnkraft.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Secure access to reliable and cheap electricity through investments in future nuclear power.”
- regulated market economy»En ansvarsfull, reglerad marknadsekonomi, byggd på långsiktigt tänkande, är för oss självklar.« (party programme ↗)“A responsible, regulated market economy, built on long-term thinking, is self-evident for us.”
Worldstate weighed in: Electricity price in SE3 is low, 0.53 SEK/kWh in April 2026 — Weakens the need for state price intervention beyond the plan's tax reduction
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2025/26:NU17)
- Committee report full text (HD01NU17)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2025/26:1316 — Jämlika villkor för alla svenska elkonsumenter oavsett geografisk plats av Per-Arne Håkansson och Niklas Karlsson (båda S)
- Motion 2025/26:1437 — En robust, kostnadseffektiv och rättvis energiförsörjning av Markus Selin m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1442 — För en stark industri och trygg elförsörjning - elektrifiering och fossilfri energi för klimatmålen av Patrik Lundqvist m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1447 — Bättre förutsättningar för en modern industri av Ida Karkiainen m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1551 — Utbyggnad av gasturbiner i Västsverige av Sten Bergheden (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1867 — Reformer för rättvisa elpriser och stabil elförsörjning i Skåne av Ulrika Heindorff m.fl. (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1901 — Ett gemensamt elprisområde av Magnus Manhammar (S)
- Motion 2025/26:2238 — En övergripande säkrad elinfrastruktur av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2246 — Säkrad elförsörjning till Gotland av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2335 — Gemensamt elprisområde eller kompensation för utsatta regioner av Magnus Manhammar (S)
- Motion 2025/26:2519 — Kompensation för Skåne med anledning av stoppet av vindkraftsutbyggnaden vid Kriegers flak av Morgan Johansson m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:2656 — Ett sammanhållet statligt ägande av elnätet av Cecilia Rönn (L)
- Motion 2025/26:2669 — Robust elsystem för Sveriges välstånd av Lars Engsund (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2682 — En nationell strategi för ödrift i elnäten av Magnus Manhammar (S)
- Motion 2025/26:2789 — Klimatet av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2025/26:2796 — Om grön tillväxt och gröna investeringar av Mathias Tegnér (S)
- Motion 2025/26:2797 — Energipolitik för mer och förnybar el till rimliga priser av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2025/26:2822 — Militärt och civilt försvar samt samhällets krisberedskap av Mikael Larsson m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2025/26:2898 — Rimlig effektavgift på el av Lars Beckman (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2974 — Avveckling av elcertifikatssystemet av Hans Eklind och Camilla Brodin (båda KD)
Source: The Swedish Parliament