2023-06-142022/23:TU15 · p.1TUTransport & infrastructure
The Swedish National Audit Office's report on the Transport Board's supervision
The National Audit Office's review of the Swedish Transport Agency's supervision
What's at stake: The agency's supervision determines whether the rules for vehicles, railways, shipping and aviation are followed, and thereby safety for travellers and for transport companies. The decision is about whether the shortcomings can be fixed through the agency's own development work or require a review from outside.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the government's measures in response to the National Audit Office's criticism of how supervision at the Swedish Transport Agency is steered are sufficient, or whether the Riksdag should instead demand an external review of the agency.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee welcomes the National Audit Office's review, shares the government's assessments and considers the government's measures well balanced - including the assignment given to the Transport Agency to report how follow-up, analysis and prioritisation of supervision are being strengthened agency-wide. The Riksdag therefore rejects the motion calling for an external agency review and files the government's report.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 1 (SD)
The reservation (SD) calls for an external review of the Transport Agency to be carried out. The reasoning is that the agency's activities need to be streamlined and its administrative burden reduced, which according to the reservation will not be achieved through the agency's own development work.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: closing the file on the government's report (no further action) and rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 1 by SD.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | Yes | Yes 21/0/0/3 | follows the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| S | Yes | Yes 94/0/0/13 | follows the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| MP | Yes | Yes 15/0/0/3 | follows the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| C | No | Yes 21/0/0/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| L | No | Yes 14/0/0/2 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| KD | No | Yes 16/0/0/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| M | No | Yes 60/0/0/8 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| SD | No | No 0/63/0/9 | follows the plan | confidence: high | not addressed |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects motion 2022/23:2355 by Thomas Morell et al. (SD) and files memorandum 2022/23:68.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motion 2022/23:2355 av Thomas Morell m.fl. (SD) och lägger skrivelse 2022/23:68 till handlingarna.
Riksdag decision: In a memorandum, the government presents its assessment of the observations and recommendations that the Swedish National Audit Office presents in the report Transport Board Supervision – governance and prioritization. The government also states what measures have been taken in response to the report. The Riksdag welcomes the Swedish National Audit Office's report and notes that the government partially agrees with the observations and recommendations presented in the report. The Riksdag filed the government's memorandum, that is, concluded the case.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to conduct an external review of the Transport Agency to streamline operations and reduce administrative burden. (SD) — Reservation 1
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan says nothing about a review of the Transport Agency.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan says nothing about a review of the Transport Agency. The nearest related principles are that the public sector's share of the economy must be allowed to grow and that public ownership shall be strong within transport systems and other infrastructure, as well as that companies' environmental crimes justify strong oversight. An external review aimed at streamlining and reducing administrative burden points in the opposite direction.
Original (Swedish)
Planen säger inget om en översyn av Transportstyrelsen. Närmast liggande principer är att den offentliga sektorns andel av ekonomin måste få växa och att samhällsägandet ska vara starkt inom transportsystem och övrig infrastruktur, samt att företagens ekobrott motiverar stark tillsyn. En extern översyn som syftar till renodling och minskad administrativ belastning pekar i motsatt riktning.
- growing public sectordecisive»Vänsterpartiet menar att den offentliga sektorns andel av ekonomin« (party programme ↗)“The Left Party believes that the public sector's share of the economy”
- state control of infrastructure»samhällsägandet är starkt inom ekonomins nyckelsektorer« (party programme ↗)“public ownership is strong within the key sectors of the economy”
- oversight against companies' crimes»De samlade ekobrotten i Sverige beräknas uppgå till hundratals« (party programme ↗)“Sweden's combined environmental crimes are estimated to amount to hundreds”
The plan's line is that supervision shall be intensified to guarantee quality, not to be streamlined or weakened, and the party programme places responsibility for authorities' governance with politics and requires administration characterized by professionalism and non-violence.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's line is that supervision shall be intensified to guarantee quality, not to be streamlined or weakened, and the party programme places responsibility for authorities' governance with politics and requires administration characterized by professionalism and non-violence. An external review aimed at streamlining operations and reducing administrative burden points away from intensified supervision. The plan does not address the authority as such, which is why the conclusion is uncertain.
Original (Swedish)
Planens linje är att tillsyn ska växlas upp för att garantera kvalitet, inte att renodlas eller lättas, och partiprogrammet lägger ansvaret för myndigheternas styrning hos politiken och kräver förvaltning präglad av professionalitet och oväld. En extern översyn i syfte att renodla verksamheten och minska den administrativa belastningen pekar bort från stärkt tillsyn. Planen behandlar inte myndigheten som sådan, varför slutsatsen är osäker.
- intensified supervisiondecisive»Tillsynen av sjukvården ska växlas upp för att garantera kvaliteten.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Supervision of healthcare shall be intensified to guarantee quality.”
- professional administration»ska genomföra de politiska besluten, styrs av professionalitet och oväld.« (party programme ↗)“shall implement the political decisions, governed by professionalism and non-violence.”
- political responsibility for governance»ansvaret kan aldrig överlämnas till icke valda ämbetsmän.« (party programme ↗)“responsibility can never be handed over to unelected officials.”
The plan does not address the Transport Authority's organization.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan does not address the Transport Authority's organization. The closest principle is that activity shall be subject to oversight by a public authority with power to intervene and that the state through legislation and oversight shall ensure that fair conditions prevail, at the same time as a high traffic safety standard is maintained. An external review aimed at streamlining the activity and reducing administrative burden risks weakening oversight, which is why the plan argues against the demand.
Original (Swedish)
Planen behandlar inte Transportstyrelsens organisation. Den närmast liggande principen är att verksamhet ska stå under tillsyn av en offentlig myndighet med kraft att ingripa och att staten genom lagstiftning och övervakning ska se till att sunda villkor råder, samtidigt som en hög trafiksäkerhetsstandard ska upprätthållas. En extern översyn som syftar till att renodla verksamheten och minska den administrativa belastningen riskerar att svaga tillsynen, varför planen närmast talar emot kravet.
- strong public oversightdecisive»All verksamhet ska vara underställd tillsyn av en offentlig myndighet som ytterst« (party programme ↗)“All activity shall be subject to oversight by a public authority that”
- state oversight of the market»Staten ska genom lagstiftning och övervakning se« (party programme ↗)“The state shall through legislation and oversight”
- high traffic safety standard»miljöpåverkan samtidigt som en hög trafikstandard« (party programme ↗)“environmental impact at the same time as a high traffic standard”
The plan's guiding commitment is to clean up the regulatory jungle and reduce bureaucracy, to shorten timeframes for authority administration and that the state shall do what it is there for as efficiently and fairly as possible.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's guiding commitment is to clean up the regulatory jungle and reduce bureaucracy, to shorten timeframes for authority administration and that the state shall do what it is there for as efficiently and fairly as possible. An external review that clarifies the authority's activities and reduces administrative burden is a means to this. The plan does not mention the Transport Agency, so the conclusion is derived.
Original (Swedish)
Planens bärande åtagande är att rensa upp i regelträsket och minska byråkratin, att korta ledtiderna för myndighetsutövning och att staten ska göra det den är till för så effektivt och rättssäkert som möjligt. En extern översyn som renodlar myndighetens verksamhet och minskar den administrativa belastningen är ett medel för detta. Planen nämner inte Transportstyrelsen, varför slutsatsen härleds.
- clean up the regulatory jungledecisive»Rensa upp i regelträsket för entreprenörer, stora som små.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Clean up the regulatory jungle for entrepreneurs, large and small.”
- shorter handling times»Ledtiderna för handläggning och myndighetsutövning i domstolar och myndigheter måste kortas och tillgången till ombud förbättras.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Timeframes for handling and authority administration in courts and authorities must be shortened and access to representatives improved.”
- reduced bureaucracy»Dyra, krångliga och innovationshämmande regelverk ligger som en våt filt över delar av landsbygden. Vi ska rensa upp bland överflödiga regler och byråkrati.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Expensive, complicated and innovation-blocking regulations lie like a wet blanket over parts of the countryside. We shall clean up excess regulations and bureaucracy.”
- state exists for people»Staten är till för människan, inte tvärtom.« (party programme ↗)“The state exists for the people, not the other way around.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan wants to reduce regulatory burden, quickly remove obstacles for companies and people and clarify agency roles, and cultivates a healthy scepticism towards increased public power claims.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to reduce regulatory burden, quickly remove obstacles for companies and people and clarify agency roles, and cultivates a healthy scepticism towards increased public power claims. An external review that clarifies operations and reduces administrative burden lies in that direction. The plan, however, says nothing about the Transport Agency or about the form of scrutiny of individual agencies, so confidence is low.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill minska regelbördan, snabbt undanröja hinder för företag och människor och renodla myndighetsroller, och odlar en sund skepsis mot ökade offentliga maktanspråk. En extern översyn som renodlar verksamheten och minskar den administrativa belastningen ligger i den linjen. Planen säger dock inget om Transportstyrelsen eller om formen för granskning av enskilda myndigheter, varför konfidensen är låg.
- reduced regulatory burdendecisive»Regelbördan för små företag ska minska« (party programme ↗)“The regulatory burden for small enterprises shall be reduced”
- remove administrative obstacles»Politikens uppgift måste vara att snabbt undanröja hinder för att underlätta för företag och människor att ta« (party programme ↗)“The task of policy must be to quickly remove obstacles to facilitate companies and people to take”
- clarified agency roles»Arbetsförmedlingens myndighetsuppdrag ska tydligt skiljas från utförarrollen.« (party programme ↗)“The Employment Service's agency mandate shall be clearly separated from its provider role.”
- scrutiny of public authority»en sund skepsis mot ökade offentliga maktanspråk« (party programme ↗)“a healthy scepticism towards increased public power claims”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan makes evaluation, cost tracking and quality control important political tasks and requires that forthcoming rules be tested from a small business owner perspective and that bureaucracy is counteracted.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan makes evaluation, cost tracking and quality control important political tasks and requires that forthcoming rules be tested from a small business owner perspective and that bureaucracy is counteracted. An external review to clarify the authority's activities and reduce administrative burden follows from these commitments. The manifesto's demand for clarified government mandates points in the same direction.
Original (Swedish)
Planen gör utvärdering, kostnadsuppföljning och kvalitetskontroll till viktiga politiska uppgifter och kräver att tillkommande regler prövas ur ett småföretagarperspektiv och att byråkrati motverkas. En extern översyn som ska renodla myndighetens verksamhet och minska den administrativa belastningen följer av dessa åtaganden. Manifestets krav på renodlade myndighetsuppdrag pekar samma väg.
- monitoring and controldecisive»Utvärdering, kostnadsuppföljning och kvalitetskontroll är därför viktiga politiska« (party programme ↗)“Evaluation, cost tracking and quality control are therefore important political”
- testing from small business perspective»Tillkommande lagar bör prövas ur ett småföretagarperspektiv.« (party programme ↗)“Forthcoming laws should be tested from a small business owner perspective.”
- clarified government mandates»Renodla polisens uppdrag. Polisen fokuserar idag alldeles för mycket på annat än brottsbekämpning.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Clarify the police mandate. The police today focus far too much on things other than crime prevention.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan wants to establish an efficiency office that shall review the finances of all government agencies, shorten processing times with a deadline and significantly reduce the administrative burden.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to establish an efficiency office that shall review the finances of all government agencies, shorten processing times with a deadline and significantly reduce the administrative burden. An external review of the agency to streamline operations and reduce administration is precisely the kind of external scrutiny the plan advocates. The plan therefore supports the counter-proposal's demands substantively.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill inrätta ett effektiviseringskansli som ska gå igenom alla myndigheters ekonomi, korta handläggningstiderna med en bortre tidsgräns och kraftigt minska den administrativa bördan. En extern översyn av myndigheten för att renodla verksamheten och reducera administrationen är precis den sortens utifrån kommande granskning planen förordar. Planen stöder därför motförslagets krav i sak.
- external efficiency reviewdecisive»Inrätta ett effektiviseringskansli som ska gå inom alla myndigheters ekonomi för att frigöra resurser till försvaret« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Establish an efficiency office that shall review all government agencies' finances to free up resources for defence”
- shorter processing times»Korta myndigheternas handläggningstider genom en bortre tidsgräns« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Shorten government processing times through a deadline”
- reduced administrative burden»Ta bort en tredjedel av företagens administrationskostnader och en tredjedel av regelkrånglet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Remove one-third of companies' administrative costs and one-third of regulatory red tape”
- combat public waste»Offentligt slöseri i alla former ska bekämpas.« (party programme ↗)“Public waste in all forms shall be combated.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto explicitly wants to merge agencies and streamline public activities where possible, stop waste in government agencies and reduce administrative burden.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto explicitly wants to merge agencies and streamline public activities where possible, stop waste in government agencies and reduce administrative burden. The plan also wants to strengthen opportunities for accountability when the handling of public resources falls short. An external review of the agency to streamline activity and reduce administration is thus exactly what the plan is asking for.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet vill uttryckligen slå samman myndigheter och renodla offentliga verksamheter där det är möjligt, stoppa slöseriet inom myndigheterna och minska den administrativa bördan. Planen vill också stärka möjligheterna till ansvarsutkrävande när hanteringen av offentliga resurser brister. En extern översyn av myndigheten för att renodla verksamheten och minska administrationen är därmed just vad planen efterfrågar.
- streamline public activitydecisive»Sverigedemokraterna vill också slå samman myndigheter och renodla offentliga verksamheter där det är möjligt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden Democrats also want to merge agencies and streamline public activities where possible.”
- stop government agency waste»Stoppa slöseriet inom myndigheterna och slå samman myndigheter« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Stop waste in government agencies and merge agencies”
- reduced administrative burden»Verka för regelförenkling och avlasta småföretagens administrativa börda« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Work for regulatory simplification and ease the administrative burden on small businesses”
- accountability in administration»Sverigedemokraterna vill stärka möjligheter för ansvarsutkrävande när hanteringen av de offentliga resurserna brister.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden Democrats want to strengthen opportunities for accountability when the handling of public resources falls short.”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2022/23:TU15)
- Committee report full text (HA01TU15)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2022/23:2355 — med anledning av skr. 2022/23:68 Riksrevisionens rapport om Transportstyrelsens tillsyn av Thomas Morell m.fl. (SD)
- Regeringens skrivelse 2022/23:68 — Riksrevisionens rapport om Transportstyrelsens tillsyn
Source: The Swedish Parliament