2023-05-242022/23:TU10 · p.14TUTransport & infrastructure

Historical vehicles and the motor hobby

The regulatory framework for historic vehicles and the motoring hobby

What's at stake: The outcome affects how roughly 200,000 older cars and motorcycles in traffic are treated in inspection and regulation, as well as the conditions for the many enthusiasts and associations that preserve this rolling heritage.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

The question is whether the Riksdag should take a special initiative to simplify the regulatory framework and strengthen protections for historic vehicles and the motoring hobby, or whether the current work by the responsible authorities is sufficient.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The committee highlights the cultural-historical value of older vehicles and the importance of the motoring hobby for meaningful leisure and community, but considers that the regulations already allow room for amateur-built and rebuilt vehicles and that the matter is being handled adequately by the relevant authorities, and therefore takes no special initiative.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 30 (SD)

The reservation argues that the motoring hobby plays a crucial role in preserving this rolling heritage and must not be jeopardized by arbitrary authority decisions, and wants the rules on inspection and rebuilt vehicles reviewed and modernized to make things easier for inspection bodies and vehicle owners.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 30 by SD.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
VNoYes 18/0/0/6departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed
SNoYes 92/1/0/14departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed
MPNoYes 13/0/0/5departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed
CNoYes 21/0/0/3departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
LNoYes 11/0/0/5departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed
KDNoYes 14/0/0/5departs from the planconfidence: mediumderived
MNoYes 59/0/0/9departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
SDown reservationNoNo 0/63/0/9follows the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed

Broke with the party line

SAdnan Dibrani (S, Hallands län)No — party line: Yes

MPs whose vote differs from their party's majority position in this division. Marked with a dark ring in the chamber view.

Committee proposal

Parliament rejects the motions 2022/23:296 by Jan Ericson (M), 2022/23:601 by Marléne Lund Kopparklint (M), and 2022/23:1014 by Thomas Morell et al. (SD) motions 55, 56 and 94.

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2022/23:296 av Jan Ericson (M), 2022/23:601 av Marléne Lund Kopparklint (M) och 2022/23:1014 av Thomas Morell m.fl. (SD) yrkandena 55, 56 och 94.

Riksdag decision: Parliament rejected 104 proposals in motions from the general motion period of 2022. The proposals concern, among other things, a fossil-free vehicle fleet, charging and fossil-free fueling, autonomous vehicles, heavier and longer trucks, parking matters, the vehicle traffic register, and vehicle guardians.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan says nothing about motor hobbies or inspection regulations.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan says nothing about motor hobbies or inspection regulations. The nearest related principles are that the party sees arbitrary official exercise of power as a problem and wants to protect the space for associational life and leisure activities outside commercial logic. Based on these principles, the plan weakly speaks for a review that makes the regulations predictable for vehicle owners and inspection bodies.

Original (Swedish)

Planen säger ingenting om motorhobbyn eller besiktningsregler. Närmast liggande principer är att partiet ser godtyckligt myndighetsutövande som ett problem och vill värna utrymmet för föreningsliv och fritidsaktiviteter utanför den kommersiella logiken. Utifrån dessa principer talar planen svagt för en översyn som gör regelverket förutsägbart för fordonsägare och besiktningsorgan.

  • against arbitrary official actiondecisive»Människor möts ibland av godtyckligt myndighetsutövande« (party programme ↗)“People sometimes meet arbitrary official exercise of power”
  • value associational life space»Det gäller exempelvis tillgång till lokaler och utrymmen« (party programme ↗)“This concerns for example access to premises and spaces”
  • value leisure and cultural heritage»Även kulturen och idrotten har utarmats när skolbibliotek läggs ned, simskolan blivit dyrare och biografer finns på färre orter.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Culture and sports have also been impoverished when school libraries are closed, swimming schools become more expensive and cinemas are found in fewer places.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

SSocialdemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan does not address inspection regulations, rebuilt vehicles or motor hobbies.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan does not address inspection regulations, rebuilt vehicles or motor hobbies. The closest principles are that civil society's associational life is the foundation of democracy and that access to leisure activities needs to increase, and that the plan does not want to put obstacles in the way for those who need the car. Based on these principles, the plan speaks weakly for a modernization of the regulatory framework, provided that basic safety is maintained. The position is inferred, not stated in the plan.

Original (Swedish)

Planen behandlar inte besiktningsregler, ombyggda fordon eller motorhobbyn. Närmast liggande principer är att civilsamhällets föreningsliv är demokratins underbyggnad och att tillgången till fritidsaktiviteter behöver öka, samt att planen inte vill lägga hinder i vägen för dem som behöver bilen. Utifrån dessa principer talar planen svagt för en modernisering av regelverket, förutsatt att grundläggande säkerhet består. Ställningstagandet är härlett, inte belagt i planen.

  • civil society's valuedecisive»Ett starkt och levande civilsamhälle är demokratins underbyggnad.« (party programme ↗)“A strong and vibrant civil society is the foundation of democracy.”
  • access to leisure activities»Tillgången till fritidsaktiviteter till rimliga kostnader, både vad gäller idrott och kultur, behöver öka.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Access to leisure activities at reasonable cost, both in terms of sports and culture, needs to increase.”
  • do not blame car drivers»Klimatkrisen kan aldrig lösas med att skuldbelägga människor som behöver ta bilen till affären« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The climate crisis can never be solved by blaming people who need to take the car to the store”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MPMiljöpartietNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan does not address motor hobbies or inspection regulations.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan does not address motor hobbies or inspection regulations. The closest commitments are that cultural heritage shall be preserved and that unnecessary bureaucracy shall be avoided through active deregulation work, which suggests a review of the rules. The plan's requirement that instruments shall promote vehicles that meet climate and health goals at the same time sets a limit, but the counter-proposal does not request any relief there.

Original (Swedish)

Planen behandlar inte motorhobbyn eller besiktningsregler. Närmast liggande åtaganden är att kulturarvet ska bevaras och att onödig byråkrati ska undvikas genom aktivt regelförenklingsarbete, vilket talar för en översyn av regelverket. Planens krav på att styrmedel ska främja fordon som klarar klimat- och hälsomålen sätter samtidigt en gräns, men motförslaget begär ingen lättnad där.

  • active deregulation workdecisive»Onödig byråkrati ska undvikas genom ett aktivt« (party programme ↗)“Unnecessary bureaucracy shall be avoided through active”
  • cultural heritage preserved»Kulturarvet är vårt gemensamma arv.« (party programme ↗)“Cultural heritage is our common heritage.”
  • instruments for clean vehicles»Lagar och ekonomiska styrmedel ska användas för« (party programme ↗)“Laws and economic instruments shall be used for”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

CCenterpartietNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan's overarching commitment is to clean up excess regulations and bureaucracy and that the state shall not over-regulate people's lives.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan's overarching commitment is to clean up excess regulations and bureaucracy and that the state shall not over-regulate people's lives. A review and modernization of inspection rules for rebuilt and amateur-built vehicles is such regulatory simplification, and vehicle hobby is moreover a civil society activity whose barriers politics according to the plan shall remove. The hobby is not mentioned, so the position is derived.

Original (Swedish)

Planens genomgående åtagande är att rensa upp bland överflödiga regler och byråkrati och att staten inte ska genomreglera människors liv. En översyn och modernisering av besiktningsreglerna för ombyggda och amatörbyggda fordon är en sådan regelförenkling, och motorhobbyn är dessutom en civilsamhällsverksamhet vars hinder politiken enligt planen ska riva. Motorhobbyn nämns inte, så ställningstagandet härleds.

  • clean up excess rulesdecisive»Vi ska rensa upp bland överflödiga regler och byråkrati.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We shall clean up excess regulations and bureaucracy.”
  • regulatory simplification»Rensa upp i regelträsket för entreprenörer, stora som små.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Clean up the regulatory jungle for entrepreneurs, large and small.”
  • remove barriers for civil society»Politikens uppgift är att riva hinder och röja väg för denna utvecklingskraft.« (party programme ↗)“Politics' task is to remove barriers and clear the way for this creative force.”
  • care for heritage»vårda och utveckla ett kulturarv« (party programme ↗)“care for and develop a cultural heritage”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

LLiberalernaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan does not address inspection rules or automotive hobbies.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan does not address inspection rules or automotive hobbies. The closest commitments are that policy should quickly remove obstacles for companies and people, that cultural heritage should be kept accessible for coming generations and that amateur culture has its own value. Based on these principles, the plan argues for a review and modernization of the regulatory framework for rebuilt and amateur-built vehicles.

Original (Swedish)

Planen behandlar inte besiktningsregler eller motorhobbyn. Närmast liggande åtaganden är att politiken snabbt ska undanröja hinder för företag och människor, att kulturarvet ska hållas tillgängligt för kommande generationer och att amatörkulturen har ett eget värde. Utifrån dessa principer talar planen för en översyn och modernisering av regelverket för ombyggda och amatörbyggda fordon.

  • remove unnecessary obstaclesdecisive»Politikens uppgift måste vara att snabbt undanröja hinder för att underlätta för företag och människor att ta vara på de möjligheter som den tekniska utvecklingen skapar.« (party programme ↗)“The task of policy must be to quickly remove obstacles to facilitate companies and people taking advantage of the opportunities created by technological development.”
  • preserved cultural heritage»Kulturarvet – vårt gemensamma minne i form av historiska lämningar, kulturlandskap, arkiv, traditioner, dialekter och annat – utvecklas ständigt genom att samtiden ger sitt bidrag.« (party programme ↗)“Cultural heritage – our shared memory in the form of historical remains, cultural landscapes, archives, traditions, dialects and other – is constantly developed as the present makes its contribution.”
  • the value of amateur culture»Amatörkulturen ger möjligheter för enskild utveckling, stärker det civila samhället och kan bli en brygga över till professionellt kulturutövande.« (party programme ↗)“Amateur culture provides opportunities for individual development, strengthens civil society and can become a bridge to professional cultural practice.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

KDKristdemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The plan's stewardship responsibility explicitly includes material cultural heritage in the form of objects and the customs and practices that have evolved through history, which affects the rolling cultural heritage.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan's stewardship responsibility explicitly includes material cultural heritage in the form of objects and the customs and practices that have evolved through history, which affects the rolling cultural heritage. The plan also sees vehicles as means for leisure interests and freedom and requires that the traffic system be designed with regard to all approved vehicle types. A review and modernization of inspection rules for converted vehicles thus aligns with the plan's direction.

Original (Swedish)

Planens förvaltarskapsansvar omfattar uttryckligen det materiella kulturarvet i form av föremål och de seder och bruk som vuxit fram genom historien, vilket träffar det rullande kulturarvet. Planen ser också fordon som medel för fritidsintressen och frihet och kräver att trafiksystemet utformas med hänsyn till alla godkända fordonsslag. En översyn och modernisering av besiktningsreglerna för ombyggda fordon ligger därmed i planens riktning.

  • stewardship of cultural heritagedecisive»vi ser i form av till exempel kulturhistorisk bebyggelse, fornlämningar och föremål men även de seder« (party programme ↗)“we see in the form of for example culturally historic buildings, archaeological remains and objects but also the customs”
  • vehicles as leisure and freedom»fordonsslag är också medel för att förverkliga fritidsintressen och känna frihet.« (party programme ↗)“vehicle types are also means to realize leisure interests and feel freedom.”
  • consideration for all vehicle types»Trafiksystemet ska utformas med hänsyn till alla« (party programme ↗)“The traffic system shall be designed with regard to all”
  • strengthened civil society»STÄRKT CIVILSAMHÄLLE« (2022 manifesto ↗)“STRENGTHENED CIVIL SOCIETY”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MModeraternaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The counter-proposal requires a review and modernization of inspection rules for rebuilt vehicles and protection against arbitrary authority decisions.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The counter-proposal requires a review and modernization of inspection rules for rebuilt vehicles and protection against arbitrary authority decisions. The plan promises to significantly reduce red tape, shorten authorities' processing times and establishes in the party programme that exercise of public power should be guided by equal treatment and predictability. Motorism is not mentioned, but the requirements are in line with these commitments.

Original (Swedish)

Motförslaget kräver en översyn och modernisering av besiktningsreglerna för ombyggda fordon och skydd mot godtyckliga myndighetsbeslut. Planen lovar att kraftigt minska regelkrånglet, korta myndigheternas handläggningstider och slår i idéprogrammet fast att offentlig maktutövning ska vägledas av likabehandling och förutsebarhet. Motorhobbyn nämns inte, men kraven ligger i linje med dessa åtaganden.

  • less red tapedecisive»Ta bort en tredjedel av företagens administrationskostnader och en tredjedel av regelkrånglet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Remove a third of companies' administrative costs and a third of red tape”
  • predictable exercise of authority»principer om likabehandling och förutsebarhet.« (party programme ↗)“principles of equal treatment and predictability.”
  • faster authority decisions»Korta myndigheternas handläggningstider genom en bortre tidsgräns« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Shorten authorities' processing times through a final deadline”
  • the car as freedom»har råd att ta bilen, oavsett om den går på bensin eller el« (2022 manifesto ↗)“can afford to take the car, whether it runs on petrol or electric”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

SDSverigedemokraternaNoNofollows the plannot addressed

The election manifesto wants the motor-minded youth to feel that their interest is appreciated instead of being hunted by authorities, and emphasizes that cultural heritage should be protected and brought to life.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The election manifesto wants the motor-minded youth to feel that their interest is appreciated instead of being hunted by authorities, and emphasizes that cultural heritage should be protected and brought to life. The counter-proposal's demand for modernized and less arbitrary rules for inspection of modified vehicles is in line with the plan's general commitment to regulatory simplification and legal certainty in agency practice. The plan does not mention vehicle inspection, however, which is why the support is derived.

Original (Swedish)

Valmanifestet vill att den motorburna ungdomen ska känna att deras intresse uppskattas i stället för att jagas av myndigheter, och betonar att kulturarvet ska värnas och levandegöras. Motförslagets krav på moderniserade och mindre godtyckliga regler för besiktning och ombyggda fordon ligger i linje med planens allmänna åtagande om regelförenkling och rättssäkerhet i myndighetsutövningen. Planen nämner dock inte fordonsbesiktning, varför stödet är härlett.

  • protect motor enthusiasmdecisive»Till exempel behöver den motorburna ungdomen känna att deras intresse och engagemang uppskattas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“For example, the motor-minded youth need to feel that their interest and engagement is appreciated.”
  • regulatory simplification and legal certainty»Förenkla regelverken och förbättra rättssäkerheten« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Simplify the regulations and improve legal certainty”
  • supportive authorities»Myndigheterna får inte bli företagens fiender som sätter käppar i hjulen utan måste få en mer stödjande funktion.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Authorities must not become the enemies of business that put spokes in the wheel but must get a more supportive function.”
  • respect for cultural heritage»med en gemensam stolthet och respekt för det kulturella arvet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“with shared pride and respect for the cultural heritage”

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament