2026-03-182025/26:FiU22 · p.10FiUEconomy & finance
Money laundering and bank and payment fraud
What's at stake: The decision affects how well protected the public is against bank-ID and payment fraud, who bears the financial loss when fraud nonetheless occurs, and how closely banks' role in tax evasion and money laundering is scrutinised.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the Riksdag should already call for tighter requirements on banks - such as shared liability for fraud losses and possible loss of a banking licence for repeated tax evasion - or whether the ongoing work on new anti-money-laundering legislation and the banks' own anti-fraud measures should be allowed to continue without further direction.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee holds that combating fraud, money laundering and terrorist financing must be a high priority and points to ongoing work on uniform EU anti-money-laundering legislation, national measures already implemented such as a licensing requirement for payment services and a new law on penalties for unlawful financial activity, plus the government's continued dialogue with the banks and the Financial Supervisory Authority on the banks' anti-fraud package, and therefore rejects the motions.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 20 (V)
The dissenter wants the government to investigate whether banks repeatedly guilty of tax evasion or aiding tax evasion should lose their right to operate as a bank, tighten security requirements for bank-ID and similar e-ID services, strengthen consumer protection against payment-market fraud, and ensure consumers do not have to bear liability for unauthorised withdrawals via bank-ID, security tokens or Swish, citing the UK model in which the customer's bank and the receiving bank share liability for reimbursement and banks publish fraud statistics.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 20 by V.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | No 0/15/0/7 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| S | No | Abstain 0/0/93/13 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| MP | No | Abstain 0/0/16/2 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| C | No | Abstain 0/0/21/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| L | No | Yes 10/0/0/6 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| KD | No | Yes 17/0/0/2 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| M | Yes | Yes 60/0/0/8 | follows the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| SD | No | Yes 61/0/0/10 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2025/26:177 by Ilona Szatmári Waldau et al. (V) amendment 8, 2025/26:330 by Bo Broman and Linda Lindberg (both SD) amendments 1-3, 2025/26:720 by Anna-Belle Strömberg et al. (S), 2025/26:830 by Mikael Larsson (C), 2025/26:972 by Andreas Lennkvist Manriquez et al. (V) amendments 16-20, 2025/26:1208 by Adrian Magnusson (S), 2025/26:2153 by Sten Bergheden (M) amendments 1 and 2, 2025/26:2324 by Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M), 2025/26:2646 by Patrik Karlson (L), 2025/26:3405 by Emma Berginger et al. (MP) amendment 53, 2025/26:3559 by Mikael Damberg et al. (S) amendments 10-12, 2025/26:3581 by Ulrika Liljeberg et al. (C) amendments 11 and 12, 2025/26:3586 by Teresa Carvalho et al. (S) amendment 103 and 2025/26:3649 by Joakim Järrebring et al. (S) amendments 18 and 19.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2025/26:177 av Ilona Szatmári Waldau m.fl. (V) yrkande 8, 2025/26:330 av Bo Broman och Linda Lindberg (båda SD) yrkandena 1-3, 2025/26:720 av Anna-Belle Strömberg m.fl. (S), 2025/26:830 av Mikael Larsson (C), 2025/26:972 av Andreas Lennkvist Manriquez m.fl. (V) yrkandena 16-20, 2025/26:1208 av Adrian Magnusson (S), 2025/26:2153 av Sten Bergheden (M) yrkandena 1 och 2, 2025/26:2324 av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M), 2025/26:2646 av Patrik Karlson (L), 2025/26:3405 av Emma Berginger m.fl. (MP) yrkande 53, 2025/26:3559 av Mikael Damberg m.fl. (S) yrkandena 10-12, 2025/26:3581 av Ulrika Liljeberg m.fl. (C) yrkandena 11 och 12, 2025/26:3586 av Teresa Carvalho m.fl. (S) yrkande 103 och 2025/26:3649 av Joakim Järrebring m.fl. (S) yrkandena 18 och 19.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag has considered a statement from the government on the activities of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) in 2025. The statement addresses, among other things, the institution's work on surveillance, lending, and capacity development to promote economic development and financial stability. The statement also sets out the government's priorities for the IMF's activities. Like the government, the committee considers that the IMF has an important role in supporting Ukraine. The Riksdag considers that the statement on IMF activities provides a good picture of the institution's activities over the past year. As the Riksdag has previously stated, it is valuable that the government's priorities in relation to the IMF's work are clearly presented in the statement. The Riksdag placed the statement on record, which means that the matter was concluded. The Riksdag also rejected approximately 120 proposals in motions on financial market issues from the general motion period 2025. The motions address macroeconomic supervision and the mortgage market, SBAB, statistics on household assets and debts, structure and competition in the banking and financial market, and access to basic banking services.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to introduce an equivalent to the Finnish model for mortgages in Sweden. (V) — Reservation 20
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan demands stricter regulation of banks' socially impactful activities and wants to legislate on separating ordinary lending and borrowing from the risky business.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan demands stricter regulation of banks' socially impactful activities and wants to legislate on separating ordinary lending and borrowing from the risky business. It also sees indebtedness and economic crime as something that weakens ordinary people's position and demands effective monitoring. Sharpened security requirements and consumer protection where the bank bears responsibility for unauthorized withdrawals therefore lie in line with the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver en hårdare reglering av bankernas samhällspåverkande verksamhet och vill lagstifta om att skilja ordinarie in- och utlåning från de riskfyllda affärerna. Den ser också skuldsättning och ekonomisk brottslighet som något som försvagar vanliga människors ställning och kräver effektiv uppföljning. Skärpta säkerhetskrav och ett konsumentskydd där banken bär ansvaret för obehöriga uttag ligger därför i linje med planen.
- tighter regulation of banksdecisive»Tills dess behövs en hårdare reglering av bankernas« (party programme ↗)“Until then, tighter regulation of banks'”
- separate banks' activities»vill vi lagstifta om att skilja de två verksamheterna från varandra.« (party programme ↗)“we want to legislate on separating the two activities from each other.”
- protect households' finances»Skuldsättning försvagar många människors självständighet och« (party programme ↗)“Indebtedness weakens many people's independence and”
- monitoring of economic crime»Det behövs en effektiv uppföljning av den organiserade« (party programme ↗)“There needs to be effective monitoring of the organized”
The plan demands that tax fraud and money laundering be stopped and that fraud and all other economic crime be combated, which bears the counter-proposal's demands for stricter security requirements on e-identification and consequences for banks that participate in tax evasion.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan demands that tax fraud and money laundering be stopped and that fraud and all other economic crime be combated, which bears the counter-proposal's demands for stricter security requirements on e-identification and consequences for banks that participate in tax evasion. The plan also wants to see strengthened protection for ordinary households against unreasonable terms on financial services. The distribution of responsibility at unauthorised withdrawals is not directly addressed, so the assessment is derived.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att skattefusk och penningtvätt stoppas och att bedrägerier och all annan ekonomisk brottslighet bekämpas, vilket bär motförslagets krav på skärpta säkerhetskrav på e-legitimation och konsekvenser för banker som medverkar till skatteflykt. Planen vill också se ett stärkt skydd för vanliga hushåll mot oskäliga villkor på finansiella tjänster. Ansvarsfördelningen vid obehöriga uttag behandlas inte direkt, så bedömningen är härledd.
- combat frauddecisive»Bekämpande av bedrägerier och all annan ekonomisk brottslighet.« (party programme ↗)“Combating fraud and all other economic crime.”
- stop money laundering and tax fraud»Skattefusk, välfärdsbrottslighet och penningtvätt ska stoppas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Tax fraud, welfare crime and money laundering shall be stopped.”
- counter tax evasion»Global överenskommelse om ökad beskattning av företag.« (party programme ↗)“Global agreement on increased taxation of companies.”
- protection against unreasonable terms»Förhindrande av priskarteller och oskälig prissättning.« (party programme ↗)“Prevention of price cartels and unreasonable pricing.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan demands banks and financial actors that take responsibility for long-term sustainability and stability, and wants to regulate the financial sector through clear regulation and fair taxes.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan demands banks and financial actors that take responsibility for long-term sustainability and stability, and wants to regulate the financial sector through clear regulation and fair taxes. It particularly points out that tax planning allows the wealthy to avoid tax. Stricter requirements on banks that facilitate tax evasion and stronger consumer protection against fraud are in line with this, as is the state's responsibility to prevent financial market shortcomings from affecting ordinary households.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver banker och finansiella aktörer som tar ansvar för långsiktighet och stabilitet, och vill styra finanssektorn genom tydlig reglering och rättvisa skatter. Den pekar särskilt ut att skatteplanering låter förmögna undvika skatt. Skärpta krav på banker som medverkar till skatteflykt och ett starkare konsumentskydd mot bedrägerier ligger i linje med detta, liksom statens ansvar att motverka att finansmarknadens brister går ut över vanliga hushåll.
- responsible banksdecisive»Vi behöver banker och finansiella aktörer som tar ansvar för långsiktighet och« (party programme ↗)“We need banks and financial actors that take responsibility for long-term sustainability and”
- clear regulation of the financial sector»Genom tydlig reglering, rättvisa skatter och en ansvarsfull fördelningspolitik« (party programme ↗)“Through clear regulation, fair taxes and responsible distribution policy”
- against tax evasion»Storföretag och förmögna personer kan med hjälp av skatteplanering ofta undvika att« (party programme ↗)“Large companies and wealthy individuals can often use tax planning to avoid”
- the state protects households»Staten har ett ansvar att motverka en sådan utveckling.« (party programme ↗)“The state has a responsibility to prevent such developments.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan requires that more crimes affecting people in their everyday lives are solved and that the victims' perspective is strengthened so that those who have been harmed receive redress and better support.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that more crimes affecting people in their everyday lives are solved and that the victims' perspective is strengthened so that those who have been harmed receive redress and better support. Fraud via bank ID and payment services are precisely such everyday crimes, and shifting responsibility for unauthorized withdrawals from the consumer is a form of redress. The plan also wants to choke off the criminal economy's income.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att fler brott som drabbar folk i deras vardag klaras upp och att brottsofferperspektivet stärks så att den som utsatts får upprättelse och bättre stöd. Bedrägerier via bank-id och betaltjänster är just sådana vardagsbrott, och att flytta ansvaret för obehöriga uttag från konsumenten är en form av upprättelse. Planen vill också strypa den kriminella ekonomins inkomster.
- strengthened victims' perspectivedecisive»Brottsofferperspektivet måste stärkas. Den som utsatts för brott ska få upprättelse och bättre stöd.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The victims' perspective must be strengthened. Those who have been harmed by crime shall receive redress and better support.”
- everyday crimes shall be solved»Tryggheten ska förbättras i hela landet och fler brott som drabbar folk i deras vardag ska klaras upp.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Security shall be improved throughout the country and more crimes affecting people in their everyday lives shall be solved.”
- curtail criminal incomes»Dessutom bör en utredning om gängens inkomster och hur dessa kan strypas genomföras.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Furthermore, an investigation into gang incomes and how these can be curtailed should be conducted.”
- rule of law also digital»Samtidigt måste rättssamhället finnas även i den digitala sfären.« (party programme ↗)“At the same time, the rule of law must exist also in the digital sphere.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan requires that the individual's influence over everyday contracts is strengthened through improved consumer and contract legislation and that consumer laws are strong.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that the individual's influence over everyday contracts is strengthened through improved consumer and contract legislation and that consumer laws are strong. That the consumer should not bear responsibility for unauthorized withdrawals and that security requirements for e-identification are tightened follows from that commitment. The plan also wants crime victims to be kept harmless without having to enforce compensation themselves.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att den enskildes inflytande över vardagens avtal stärks genom förbättrad konsument- och avtalslagstiftning och att konsumentlagarna är starka. Att konsumenten inte ska bära ansvaret för obehöriga uttag och att säkerhetskraven på e-legitimation skärps följer av det åtagandet. Planen vill dessutom att brottsoffer hålls skadeslösa utan att själva behöva driva in ersättningen.
- strengthened consumer protectiondecisive»Den enskildes inflytande över de avtal som ingås i vardagen behöver stärkas genom förbättrad« (party programme ↗)“The individual's influence over the contracts entered into in everyday life needs to be strengthened through improved”
- strong consumer laws»Därför behövs en stark konkurrenslagstiftning och konsumentlagar« (party programme ↗)“Therefore a strong competition law and consumer laws are needed”
- crime victims shall be kept harmless»Brottsoffer ska snabbt få det skadestånd som utdömts i domstol utan att behöva kräva ut det« (party programme ↗)“Crime victims shall quickly receive the damages awarded in court without having to demand payment themselves”
- combat cross-border crime»Gränsöverskridande brottslighet måste mötas med en gränsöverskridande polis.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Cross-border crime must be met with cross-border policing.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan builds the market economy on active and well-informed consumers and effective legal rules, which supports the demand for strengthened security requirements for e-ID services and stronger consumer protection against fraud.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan builds the market economy on active and well-informed consumers and effective legal rules, which supports the demand for strengthened security requirements for e-ID services and stronger consumer protection against fraud. It also establishes that all crimes shall be effectively prosecuted and that society shall stand with the crime victim, which argues against the defrauded consumer themselves bearing responsibility for unauthorized withdrawals. The counter-proposal's demands therefore align with the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planen bygger marknadsekonomin på aktiva och välinformerade konsumenter och effektiva rättsliga spelregler, vilket bär kravet på skärpta säkerhetskrav på e-legitimationstjänster och ett starkare konsumentskydd mot bedrägerier. Den slår också fast att alla brott effektivt ska beivras och att samhället ska ställa sig på brottsoffrets sida, vilket talar mot att den bedragne konsumenten själv bär ansvaret för obehöriga uttag. Motförslagets krav ligger därmed i linje med planen.
- effective legal rulesdecisive»En fungerande marknadsekonomi kräver aktiva och välinformerade konsumenter samt« (party programme ↗)“A functioning market economy requires active and well-informed consumers and”
- the crime victim's side»Samhället ska ställa sig på brottsoffrets sida.« (party programme ↗)“Society shall stand with the crime victim.”
- strong consumer position»En väl utbyggd konsumentinformation är nödvändig.« (party programme ↗)“Well-developed consumer information is necessary.”
- all crimes shall be prosecuted»Alla brott ska effektivt och utan undantag beivras« (party programme ↗)“All crimes shall be effectively and without exception prosecuted”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan's answer to fraud is the judicial system: more money to investigate fraud crimes and tougher penalties, not new burdens on banks and redistributed payment responsibility.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's answer to fraud is the judicial system: more money to investigate fraud crimes and tougher penalties, not new burdens on banks and redistributed payment responsibility. The plan moreover promises significantly reduced regulatory red tape and that EU rules as a main rule are implemented at minimum level, which speaks against tightened Sweden-specific requirements. The crime victim perspective does however give some support for the requirement for consumer protection.
Original (Swedish)
Planens svar på bedrägerier är rättsväsendet: mer pengar till att utreda bedrägeribrott och skärpta straff, inte nya pålagor på banker och omfördelat betalningsansvar. Planen lovar dessutom kraftigt minskat regelkrångel och att EU-regler som huvudregel genomförs på miniminivå, vilket talar emot skärpta särsvenska krav. Brottsofferperspektivet ger dock visst stöd åt kravet på konsumentskydd.
- fraud is fought through the judicial systemdecisive»Satsa mer pengar på att utreda bedrägeribrott och annan brottslighet mot äldre« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Invest more money in investigating fraud crimes and other crimes against the elderly”
- EU rules at minimum level»Minska regelkrånglet och onödig byråkrati, bland annat genom att motverka överimplementering i Sverige av EU-beslut – som huvudregel ska EU-direktiv genomföras på miniminivå« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Reduce regulatory red tape and unnecessary bureaucracy, among other things by counteracting overimplementation in Sweden of EU decisions - as a main rule EU directives shall be implemented at minimum level”
- reduced regulatory burden»Ta bort en tredjedel av företagens administrationskostnader och en tredjedel av regelkrånglet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Remove a third of businesses' administrative costs and a third of regulatory red tape”
- crime victim perspective»Brottsoffrens perspektiv är viktigt i kriminalpolitiken.« (party programme ↗)“The crime victim perspective is important in criminal policy.”
flags: citat_migrerat
The counter-proposal wants to shift responsibility for unauthorized withdrawals from the consumer to the banks and tighten security requirements for electronic ID.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The counter-proposal wants to shift responsibility for unauthorized withdrawals from the consumer to the banks and tighten security requirements for electronic ID. The plan's guiding principle is that policy should be designed based on the best interests of crime victims and that the position of crime victims should be strengthened, which argues that the victim should not bear the loss. The plan also demands that fraud and corruption-promoting systems be counteracted and protects cash as an alternative in a vulnerable payment system.
Original (Swedish)
Motförslaget vill flytta ansvaret för obehöriga uttag från konsumenten till bankerna och skärpa säkerhetskraven på e-legitimation. Planens bärande princip är att politiken ska utformas utifrån brottsoffrets bästa och att brottsoffrets ställning ska stärkas, vilket talar för att den drabbade inte ska bära förlusten. Planen kräver också att fusk och korruptionsdrivande system motverkas och värnar kontanterna som alternativ i ett sårbart betalsystem.
- crime victim perspective firstdecisive»Utformningen av politiken måste ske utifrån brottsoffrets bästa, inte gärningsmannen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Policy design must be based on the best interests of crime victims, not the perpetrator.”
- strengthened crime victim position»Stärka brottsoffrets ställning och öka stödet till brottsoffer« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strengthen the position of crime victims and increase support to crime victims”
- counteract fraud and corruption»Både fusk och sådana system som tenderar att locka till fusk och korruption ska motverkas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Both fraud and systems that tend to encourage fraud and corruption should be counteracted.”
- robust payment system»Försvara kontanternas ställning som betalmedel i Sverige« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Protect the position of cash as a means of payment in Sweden”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2025/26:FiU22)
- Committee report full text (HD01FiU22)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2025/26:1020 — Förbud mot spårbara och programmerbara statliga betalningsmedel samt stärkt rätt till kontanter av Elsa Widding (-)
- Motion 2025/26:1163 — Införande av ett nationellt förmögenhetsregister av Adrian Magnusson (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1208 — Utökat ansvar för banker vid bedrägerier av Adrian Magnusson (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1239 — Förutsättningar för ökat bostadsbyggande av Niklas Sigvardsson m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1289 — Sänkta amorteringskrav på bostadslån av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1290 — Kontanter som betalmedel av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1295 — Rätten att kunna betala sina fakturor via giro av Sten Bergheden (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1362 — Stärkt rätt till banktjänster och motverkad finansiell exkludering av Dzenan Cisija (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1494 — Förenklande av processen att byta bank av Eric Westroth (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:1499 — Möjlighet för barn- och ungdomsrörelsen att få tillgång till och inneha bankkonton av Adrian Magnusson (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1604 — Trygg och tillgänglig kontantförsörjning i hela Sverige av Malin Danielsson (L)
- Motion 2025/26:177 — Skatteflykt av Ilona Szatmári Waldau m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2025/26:2153 — Anhöriga till person i politiskt utsatt ställning av Sten Bergheden (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2187 — Säkra kontanter som betalningsmedel av Sten Bergheden (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2322 — Bankkonto för barn och ungdomar av Sten Bergheden (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2324 — Förenklingar för PEP av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2325 — Tillgång till eget bankkonto av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2406 — Frysta ryska tillgångar till Ukraina av Markus Wiechel (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:2436 — Betaltjänster och kontanthantering av Saila Quicklund (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2441 — Statligt ägande av Oliver Rosengren och Gustaf Göthberg (båda M)
Source: The Swedish Parliament