2026-03-042025/26:AU10 · p.9AULabour market
Work via digital platforms
Employment status and work-environment responsibility in platform work
What's at stake: Platform companies that broker rides, deliveries and other services have grown fast, but by describing themselves as mere intermediaries they can avoid employer responsibility for the people doing the work. The decision affects how soon platform workers can be counted as employees with a right to secure conditions, collective agreements, and clear work-environment responsibility on the part of the companies.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether Parliament should already now instruct the government to investigate and address the problems in the platform economy and clarify platform companies' work-environment responsibility, or whether the outcome of the already ongoing inquiry into the EU platform directive should be awaited.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee rejects the motions and points to the fact that the inquiry implementing the platform directive has recently submitted a report proposing a new law on when platform workers should be considered employees, on algorithmic management, and on protection against retaliation, and intends to follow the further processing of this work with interest.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 13 (S)
The reservation (S) wants to set up an inquiry already now to map and address the problems in the platform economy, clarify platform companies' work-environment responsibility, and work for better conditions in the gig economy, since platform workers should be regarded as employees to a greater extent and more platform companies should sign collective agreements.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 13 by S.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have held
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: MPMiljöpartiet
Ja 167–94Ja 152–109
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Abstain 0/0/19/3 | differs | confidence: high | not addressed |
| S | No | No 0/93/0/13 | match | confidence: high | explicit |
| MP | No | Yes 15/0/0/3 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| C | Yes | Abstain 0/0/21/3 | differs | confidence: low | not addressed |
| L | No | Yes 14/0/0/2 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| KD | No | Yes 16/0/0/3 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| M | Yes | Yes 60/0/0/8 | match | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| SD | No | Yes 61/0/0/10 | differs | confidence: low | not addressed |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2025/26:55 by Malin Östh et al. (V) demands 10, 11 and 13, 2025/26:307 by Nooshi Dadgostar et al. (V) demands 31 and 32, 2025/26:1044 by Jamal El-Haj (-) demands 1 and 2, 2025/26:1502 by Jamal El-Haj (-) demand 2, 2025/26:1942 by Mattias Jonsson (S), 2025/26:3191 by Jonny Cato et al. (C) demand 17 and 2025/26:3590 by Ardalan Shekarabi et al. (S) demands 31 and 32.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2025/26:55 av Malin Östh m.fl. (V) yrkandena 10, 11 och 13, 2025/26:307 av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V) yrkandena 31 och 32, 2025/26:1044 av Jamal El-Haj (-) yrkandena 1 och 2, 2025/26:1502 av Jamal El-Haj (-) yrkande 2, 2025/26:1942 av Mattias Jonsson (S), 2025/26:3191 av Jonny Cato m.fl. (C) yrkande 17 och 2025/26:3590 av Ardalan Shekarabi m.fl. (S) yrkandena 31 och 32.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag said no to approximately 70 proposals in motions from the general parliamentary motion period 2025 concerning labor law and working hours. The Riksdag refers, among other things, to the fact that current regulations are not in need of the changes proposed and to the parties' responsibility for regulating conditions on the labor market. The proposals concern, among other things, employment protection, posting of workers, and work via digital platforms.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to introduce requirements for a work environment certificate for employers posting workers. (S) — Reservation 13
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The election manifesto explicitly identifies gig work and SMS jobs as sources of insecurity in the labour market, and the plan wants to develop labour law and close the space to exploit people's vulnerable positions.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto explicitly identifies gig work and SMS jobs as sources of insecurity in the labour market, and the plan wants to develop labour law and close the space to exploit people's vulnerable positions. An investigation that maps platform economy problems and clarifies platform companies' occupational health responsibility follows directly from that. The plan furthermore demands regulations that ensure serious occupational health work even where short-term profit is prioritised.
Original (Swedish)
Valplattformen pekar uttryckligen ut gig-jobb och sms-jobb som källor till otrygghet på arbetsmarknaden, och planen vill utveckla arbetsrätten och täppa till utrymmet att exploatera människors utsatta ställning. En utredning som kartlägger plattformsekonomins problem och förtydligar plattformsföretagens arbetsmiljöansvar följer direkt av det. Planen kräver dessutom regelverk som säkrar seriöst arbetsmiljöarbete också där kortsiktig vinst prioriteras.
- gig jobs create insecuritydecisive»Otryggheten skapas genom tillfälliga anställningar, sms-jobb, gig-jobb, deltidsjobb och bemanningsjobb.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Insecurity is created through temporary employment, SMS jobs, gig jobs, part-time jobs and temporary agency jobs.”
- develop labour law»Vi vill skapa tryggare jobb genom att utveckla arbetsrätten.« (party programme ↗)“We want to create more secure jobs by developing labour law.”
- occupational health responsibility everywhere»Det behövs regelverk och strukturer som säkrar ett seriöst« (party programme ↗)“There is a need for regulations and structures that ensure serious”
- stop unserious companies»Vi vill också stärka arbetsrätten och ta itu med oseriösa« (party programme ↗)“We also want to strengthen labour law and address unserious”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The programme explicitly points to the platform economy as a reason for the increase in low-paid and precarious work in Sweden.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The programme explicitly points to the platform economy as a reason for the increase in low-paid and precarious work in Sweden. The plan's answer is strong labour law, more permanent and secure jobs and a safe working environment. Mapping problems in the platform economy, clarifying workplace safety responsibility and improving conditions in the gig economy is precisely what the plan requires in substance.
Original (Swedish)
Programmet pekar uttryckligen ut plattformsekonomin som en orsak till att andelen lågbetalda och otrygga arbeten ökat i Sverige. Planens svar är stark arbetsrättslig lagstiftning, fler fasta och trygga anställningar och en säker arbetsmiljö. Att kartlägga problemen i plattformsekonomin, förtydliga arbetsmiljöansvaret och förbättra villkoren i gigekonomin är precis det planen kräver i sak.
- the platform economy creates precarious jobsdecisive»så kallade plattformsekonomin, en otillräckligt reglerad arbetskraftsinvandring och politiska« (party programme ↗)“the so-called platform economy, inadequately regulated labour immigration and political”
- secure jobs»Fler fasta och trygga anställningar.« (party programme ↗)“More permanent and secure jobs.”
- strong labour law»Stark arbetsrättslig lagstiftning.« (party programme ↗)“Strong labour law.”
- workplace safety responsibility»Säker och hållbar arbetsmiljö med stopp för dödsolyckor på eller till följd av jobbet.« (party programme ↗)“Safe and sustainable working environment with prevention of fatal accidents at or resulting from work.”
The plan states that many in the gig economy have poor working conditions and lack of security and requires that they be covered by the same workplace safety regulations and right to collective agreements as other employees.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan states that many in the gig economy have poor working conditions and lack of security and requires that they be covered by the same workplace safety regulations and right to collective agreements as other employees. It also wishes for gig workers to be covered by functioning security systems and clearer requirements to be set on employers. The counter-proposal's requirement to map the platform economy and clarify workplace safety responsibility follows directly from this.
Original (Swedish)
Planen konstaterar att många i gigekonomin har dåliga arbetsvillkor och bristande trygghet och kräver att de omfattas av samma arbetsmiljöregler och rätt till kollektivavtal som andra arbetstagare. Den vill också att gigarbetare omfattas av fungerande trygghetssystem och att tydligare krav ställs på arbetsgivare. Motförslagets krav på att kartlägga plattformsekonomin och förtydliga arbetsmiljöansvaret följer direkt av detta.
- workplace safety responsibility in gig economydecisive»Vi vill att personer som arbetar inom gigekonomin ska omfattas av samma arbetsmiljöregler och ha samma rätt till kollektivavtal som andra arbetstagare.« (party programme ↗)“We wish that people working in the gig economy shall be covered by the same workplace safety regulations and have the same right to collective agreements as other employees.”
- problems in platform work»Samtidigt arbetar en stor grupp arbetstagare inom gigekonomin där många har dåliga arbetsvillkor och bristande trygghet.« (party programme ↗)“At the same time, a large group of employees working in the gig economy have poor working conditions and lack of security.”
- security even for gig workers»Även egenföretagare, kulturarbetare och gigarbetare ska omfattas av fungerande trygghetssystemen.« (party programme ↗)“Self-employed, cultural workers and gig workers shall also be covered by functioning security systems.”
- clearer requirements on employers»Miljöpartiet vill stärka arbetstagarnas rättigheter och ställa tydligare krav på arbetsgivare« (party programme ↗)“The Green Party wishes to strengthen workers' rights and set clearer requirements on employers”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan advocates that labor market rules are primarily set by the parties instead of through legislation, and wants to reduce the regulatory burden for companies.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan advocates that labor market rules are primarily set by the parties instead of through legislation, and wants to reduce the regulatory burden for companies. To now appoint a new government inquiry that should impose expanded workplace responsibility on platform companies goes in the opposite direction. The plan simultaneously wants both flexibility and security on the labor market, which makes the assessment uncertain.
Original (Swedish)
Planen förespråkar att arbetsmarknadens spelregler i första hand sätts av parterna i stället för genom lagstiftning, och vill minska regelbördan för företagen. Att nu tillsätta en ny statlig utredning som ska ålägga plattformsföretagen utökat arbetsmiljöansvar går i motsatt riktning. Planen vill samtidigt ha både flexibilitet och trygghet på arbetsmarknaden, vilket gör bedömningen osäker.
- parties before legislationdecisive»arbetsmarknadens parter i stället för genom lagstiftning.« (party programme ↗)“labor market parties instead of through legislation.”
- flexible labor market»Det skapar en flexibel och långsiktigt hållbar arbetsmarknad och flyttar makten närmare dem som berörs.« (party programme ↗)“This creates a flexible and long-term sustainable labor market and moves power closer to those affected.”
- reduced regulatory burden»Rensa upp i regelträsket för entreprenörer, stora som små.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Clear up the regulatory tangle for entrepreneurs, both large and small.”
- flexibility and security»Svensk arbetsmarknad behöver både mer flexibilitet och mer trygghet. Stödet vid omställning och vidareutbildning måste bli bättre.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Swedish labor market needs both more flexibility and more security. Support for transition and further education must improve.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan wants rules that make it easy to do the right thing and ensure competition on fair terms even in the sharing economy era, and a labor market with low thresholds combined with strong safety systems.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants rules that make it easy to do the right thing and ensure competition on fair terms even in the sharing economy era, and a labor market with low thresholds combined with strong safety systems. Mapping problems in the platform economy and clarifying platform companies' responsibility for working environment is exactly such an adaptation of the rules. The election manifesto moreover promises that rules and tax systems are adapted to the growing sharing economy.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill ha spelregler som gör det lätt att göra rätt och säkerställer konkurrens på rättvisa villkor även i delningsekonomins tid, och en arbetsmarknad med låga trösklar kombinerad med starka trygghetssystem. Att kartlägga problemen i plattformsekonomin och förtydliga plattformsföretagens arbetsmiljöansvar är just en sådan anpassning av spelreglerna. Valmanifestet lovar dessutom att regler och skattesystem anpassas till den växande delningsekonomin.
- rules in the sharing economydecisive»Vi vill ha spelregler som gör det lätt att göra rätt och säkerställer konkurrens på rättvisa villkor även i digitaliseringens och delningsekonomins tid.« (party programme ↗)“We want rules that make it easy to do the right thing and ensure competition on fair terms even in the era of digitalization and the sharing economy.”
- low thresholds and security»En socialliberal arbetsmarknad kännetecknas av låga trösklar och hög rörlighet i kombination med starka trygghetssystem som bidrar till att den enskilde kommer tillbaka i arbete så snart som möjligt.« (party programme ↗)“A social liberal labor market is characterized by low thresholds and high mobility in combination with strong safety systems that contribute to the individual returning to work as soon as possible.”
- adapt rules to the sharing economy»En startup-kommission ska tillsättas och skattesystemet anpassas bättre till den växande delningsekonomin.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“A startup commission shall be appointed and the tax system better adapted to the growing sharing economy.”
- adapted social insurance»Socialförsäkringarna ska anpassas till studerandes och företagares situation.« (party programme ↗)“Social insurance shall be adapted to students' and entrepreneurs' situation.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan requires good employment security for all employees and that the state through advice, support and inspection actively works for an improved working environment that takes into account both physical and mental health.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires good employment security for all employees and that the state through advice, support and inspection actively works for an improved working environment that takes into account both physical and mental health. Platform work is precisely an area where these protections are unclear. Mapping the problems and clarifying platform companies' workplace responsibility thus follows from the plan, which simultaneously emphasizes the role of the parties.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver god anställningstrygghet för alla arbetstagare och att staten genom rådgivning, stöd och kontroll aktivt verkar för en förbättrad arbetsmiljö som tar hänsyn till både fysisk och psykisk hälsa. Plattformsarbete är just ett område där dessa skydd är oklara. Att kartlägga problemen och tydliggöra plattformsföretagens arbetsmiljöansvar följer därför av planen, som samtidigt betonar partsrollen.
- employment security for alldecisive»God anställningstrygghet för alla arbetstagare ska eftersträvas. Lagstiftning om« (party programme ↗)“Good employment security for all employees shall be strived for. Legislation on”
- the state's responsibility for the working environment»Staten ska bland annat genom rådgivning, stöd och kontroll aktivt verka för en förbättrad« (party programme ↗)“The state shall, among other things, through advice, support and inspection, actively work for improved”
- physical and mental working environment»Ett väl fungerande arbetarskydd och god arbetsmiljö ska ta hänsyn till såväl« (party programme ↗)“A well-functioning occupational safety and health and good working environment shall take into account both”
- the role of the parties on the labour market»Starka och partipolitiskt oberoende fackföreningar är en oundgänglig del av ett demokratiskt« (party programme ↗)“Strong and politically independent trade unions are an indispensable part of a democratic”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The counter-proposal wants to establish an inquiry about platform economy now and expand platform companies' responsibility.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The counter-proposal wants to establish an inquiry about platform economy now and expand platform companies' responsibility. The plan is based on the idea that a dynamic business sector creates prosperity and promises to remove a third of companies' administrative costs and regulatory red tape, and that EU rules should as a rule be implemented at minimum level. New Swedish charges on platform companies beyond the directive therefore go against the plan's line.
Original (Swedish)
Motförslaget vill redan nu tillsätta en utredning om plattformsekonomin och utvidga plattformsföretagens ansvar. Planen bygger på att ett dynamiskt näringsliv skapar välståndet och lovar att ta bort en tredjedel av företagens administrationskostnader och av regelkrånglet, samt att EU-regler som huvudregel ska genomföras på miniminivå. Nya svenska pålagor på plattformsföretagen utöver direktivet går därmed emot planens linje.
- reduced regulatory burdendecisive»Ta bort en tredjedel av företagens administrationskostnader och en tredjedel av regelkrånglet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Remove a third of companies' administrative costs and a third of regulatory red tape”
- EU directives at minimum level»Minska regelkrånglet och onödig byråkrati, bland annat genom att motverka överimplementering i Sverige av EU-beslut – som huvudregel ska EU-direktiv genomföras på miniminivå« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Reduce regulatory red tape and unnecessary bureaucracy, including by counteracting over-implementation in Sweden of EU decisions - as a rule EU directives should be implemented at minimum level”
- dynamic business sector»Sveriges välstånd bygger på ett dynamiskt och livskraftigt näringsliv.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden's prosperity is based on a dynamic and robust business sector.”
- confidence in market economy»Marknadsekonomin främjar hushållning, ansvar, kreativitet och långsiktighet.« (party programme ↗)“Market economy promotes economizing, responsibility, creativity and long-term thinking.”
flags: citat_migrerat
The plan does not address the platform economy, but establishes that safety and security in working life shall increase and that every Swedish workplace shall have proper occupational health and safety work.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan does not address the platform economy, but establishes that safety and security in working life shall increase and that every Swedish workplace shall have proper occupational health and safety work. Mapping the problems in the gig economy and clarifying platform companies' occupational health responsibility follows that principle. The plan's scepticism towards EU-led labour market regulations furthermore argues for an independent national investigation rather than awaiting directive implementation.
Original (Swedish)
Planen behandlar inte plattformsekonomin, men slår fast att tryggheten och säkerheten i arbetslivet ska öka och att varje svensk arbetsplats ska ha ett fullgott arbetsmiljöarbete. Att kartlägga problemen i gigekonomin och tydliggöra plattformsföretagens arbetsmiljöansvar följer den principen. Planens skepsis mot EU-styrda arbetsmarknadsregler talar dessutom för en egen nationell utredning snarare än att invänta direktivsgenomförandet.
- safety in working lifedecisive»Öka tryggheten och säkerheten i arbetslivet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Increase safety and security in working life”
- proper occupational health and safety work»Varje svensk arbetsplats ska ha ett fullgott arbetsmiljöarbete som skapar trygghet för medarbetarna.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Every Swedish workplace shall have proper occupational health and safety work that creates security for employees.”
- safe work environment»Ingen ska behöva avlida eller skadas allvarligt på jobbet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“No one should have to die or be seriously injured at work.”
- Swedish model before EU rules»Men den svenska modellen hotas för närvarande av förslag från EU om gemensamma regler för lönebildning, arbetslöshetsersättning och det sociala skyddsnätet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“But the Swedish model is currently threatened by proposals from the EU for joint rules on wage formation, unemployment benefits and the social safety net.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2025/26:AU10)
- Committee report full text (HD01AU10)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2025/26:1044 — Tydliga arbetsrättsliga regler för plattformsekonomin av Jamal El-Haj (-)
- Motion 2025/26:12 — Avsked inom offentlig sektor av Josef Fransson (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:1351 — Heltidsarbete som norm inom offentlig sektor av Roger Hedlund och Mattias Eriksson Falk (båda SD)
- Motion 2025/26:1502 — Förbättrad arbetsmiljö av Jamal El-Haj (-)
- Motion 2025/26:1504 — Stärkt skydd för arbetstagares integritet av Jamal El-Haj (-)
- Motion 2025/26:1532 — Förlängda arbetsincitament genom en moderniserad 80-90-modell av Emma Ahlström Köster (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1747 — Visselblåsarfunktion för statligt anställda av Jan Ericson (M)
- Motion 2025/26:187 — Ett modernt skydd för den personliga integriteten i arbetslivet av Leila Ali Elmi m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2025/26:1942 — Stärkta villkor och arbetsmiljö inom gigekonomin av Mattias Jonsson (S)
- Motion 2025/26:2114 — Möjliggörande av dygnspass inom svensk blåljusverksamhet av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2371 — Arbetsmiljö och arbetstid av Ciczie Weidby m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2025/26:2372 — En arbetsrätt för starka och trygga löntagare av Ciczie Weidby m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2025/26:2392 — Medborgarskapskrav vid anställning hos Migrationsverket av Markus Wiechel (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:2445 — Avtalsrätt för yrkesnära fackorganisationer av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2449 — Möjliggörande av dygnspass av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2462 — Politisk strejk av John E Weinerhall (M)
- Motion 2025/26:300 — Förbättringar och andra åtgärder kring arbetsmiljö och arbetsmarknad för nattarbete av Fredrik Lindahl (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:307 — Ordning och reda på arbetsmarknaden av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2025/26:3187 — Socialförsäkringar av Martina Johansson m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2025/26:3191 — Arbetsmarknad av Jonny Cato m.fl. (C)
Source: The Swedish Parliament