2024-04-032023/24:KrU8 · p.2KrUCulture
Cultural school
A more equal, nationally consistent municipal culture school (kulturskola)
What's at stake: Participation in the culture school is today strongly linked to parents' education level and varies sharply between municipalities, from a rich offering to none at all; greater state responsibility could even out these differences but would also shift influence and costs away from municipalities.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the state should take greater responsibility for making the municipal culture school more equal and consistent nationwide, or whether the current municipal responsibility and state grants should remain unchanged.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee rejects the motions on the municipal culture school, pointing out that culture schools now exist in almost all municipalities, that open and free-of-charge activities have become more common, and that the state grant to the culture school has been extended, which the committee views positively.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 3 (S)
The reservation wants the state to take greater responsibility for making the culture school accessible on equal terms nationwide, since participation today is strongly linked to parents' education level – 81 percent of students have at least one parent with post-secondary education, compared with 60 percent nationally – and provision varies sharply between municipalities.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 3 by S.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have held
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: VVänsterpartiet
Ja 172–93Ja 152–114
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Yes 20/0/1/3 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| S | No | No 0/92/0/14 | match | confidence: high | explicit |
| MP | No | Abstain 0/0/13/5 | differs | confidence: high | explicit |
| C | No | Abstain 0/0/21/3 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| L | No | Yes 14/0/0/2 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| KD | No | Yes 15/0/0/4 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| M | Yes | Yes 60/0/0/8 | match | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| SD | No | Yes 63/0/0/9 | differs | confidence: low | not addressed |
Broke with the party line
| VHåkan Svenneling (V, Värmlands län) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
MPs whose vote differs from their party's majority position in this division. Marked with a dark ring in the chamber view.
Committee proposal
The Riksdagen rejects the motions 2023/24:1488 by Mirja Räihä and Per-Arne Håkansson (both S) demands 5 and 6, 2023/24:1975 by Linus Sköld and Ida Karkiainen (both S) demands 1 and 2, 2023/24:2038 by Sanna Backeskog et al. (S) demands 1 and 2, 2023/24:2447 by Amanda Lind et al. (MP) demands 3-6 and 2023/24:2483 by Catarina Deremar et al. (C) demand 5.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2023/24:1488 av Mirja Räihä och Per-Arne Håkansson (båda S) yrkandena 5 och 6, 2023/24:1975 av Linus Sköld och Ida Karkiainen (båda S) yrkandena 1 och 2, 2023/24:2038 av Sanna Backeskog m.fl. (S) yrkandena 1 och 2, 2023/24:2447 av Amanda Lind m.fl. (MP) yrkandena 3-6 och 2023/24:2483 av Catarina Deremar m.fl. (C) yrkande 5.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdagen said no to approximately 30 proposals in motions regarding culture and recreation for children and young people from the general motion period 2023. The motions deal, among other things, with children's and young people's right to culture and young people's living conditions. The Riksdagen refers, among other things, to ongoing work.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to introduce a national cultural guarantee ensuring all children and young people have access to theatrical experiences during their school years. (S) — Reservation 3
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The party programme explicitly demands that cultural school be given statutory support and that a state cultural policy shall guarantee a democratically equitable distribution of resources across the country.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme explicitly demands that cultural school be given statutory support and that a state cultural policy shall guarantee a democratically equitable distribution of resources across the country. The counter-proposal wants the state to take greater responsibility for making cultural school accessible on equal terms throughout the country, which is the same commitment. The programme furthermore states that culture is a public responsibility area like school.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet kräver uttryckligen att kulturskolan ska få lagmässigt stöd och att en statlig kulturpolitik ska garantera en demokratiskt likvärdig fördelning av resurser över landet. Motförslaget vill att staten tar ett större ansvar för att göra kulturskolan tillgänglig på jämlika villkor i hela landet, vilket är samma åtagande. Programmet slår också fast att kulturen är ett offentligt ansvarsområde i likhet med skolan.
- statutory cultural schooldecisive»Kulturskolan ska få lagmässigt stöd och bibliotekslagen ska skärpas« (party programme ↗)“Cultural school shall receive statutory support and the library act shall be sharpened”
- state equity guarantee»En statlig kulturpolitik ska garantera en demokratiskt likvärdig« (party programme ↗)“A state cultural policy shall guarantee a democratically equitable”
- culture as public responsibility»Lagen ska slå fast att kulturen är ett offentligt ansvarsområde i likhet med skolan, socialtjänsten eller försvaret.« (party programme ↗)“The law shall establish that culture is a public responsibility area like school, social services or defence.”
- depleted culture and sport»Även kulturen och idrotten har utarmats när skolbibliotek läggs ned, simskolan blivit dyrare och biografer finns på färre orter.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Culture and sport have also been depleted when school libraries are closed, swimming pools become more expensive and cinemas exist in fewer places.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan explicitly states that music and cultural education should be strengthened to ensure all children have access to cultural activities, with special investments in resource-poor areas.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan explicitly states that music and cultural education should be strengthened to ensure all children have access to cultural activities, with special investments in resource-poor areas. It also establishes that cultural education should be accessible to all children and that parents' finances should not determine access. The counter-proposal's demand for greater state responsibility for equal access is thus the plan's own line.
Original (Swedish)
Planen säger uttryckligen att kulturskolan ska stärkas för att säkra alla barns möjligheter till kulturella aktiviteter, med särskilda satsningar i resurssvaga områden. Den slår också fast att kulturskolor ska vara tillgängliga för alla barn och att föräldrarnas plånbok inte ska avgöra tillgången. Motförslagets krav på ett större statligt ansvar för jämlik tillgång är därmed planens egen linje.
- strengthened cultural education for all childrendecisive»Vi vill stärka kulturskolan för att säkra alla barns möjligheter till kulturella aktiviteter, och genomföra särskilda satsningar i resurssvaga områden.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to strengthen music and cultural education to ensure all children have access to cultural activities, and implement special investments in resource-poor areas.”
- cultural education accessible to all»ska vara tillgängliga för alla barn« (party programme ↗)“should be accessible to all children”
- finances should not determine access»Tillgången till fritidsaktiviteter till rimliga kostnader, både vad gäller idrott och kultur, behöver öka. Föräldrarnas plånbok ska inte avgöra.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Access to leisure activities at reasonable costs, both sports and culture, must increase. Parents' finances should not determine access.”
- culture across the country»konstens olika uttrycksformer tillgängliga för alla, barn och vuxna, i hela landet« (party programme ↗)“different artistic expressions accessible to all, children and adults, across the country”
The election manifesto wishes to strengthen the culture school and establish a culture school law, and the party programme confirms that all children shall be able to engage in culture through some form of culture school regardless of their family's economic circumstances.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto wishes to strengthen the culture school and establish a culture school law, and the party programme confirms that all children shall be able to engage in culture through some form of culture school regardless of their family's economic circumstances. The state taking greater responsibility for equitable access across the country is precisely what these commitments require, when participation today is driven by parents' education level.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet vill stärka kulturskolan och inrätta en kulturskolelag, och partiprogrammet slår fast att alla barn ska kunna utöva kultur inom någon form av kulturskola oavsett familjens ekonomiska förutsättningar. Att staten tar ett större ansvar för jämlik tillgång i hela landet är precis vad dessa åtaganden kräver, när deltagandet i dag styrs av föräldrarnas utbildningsnivå.
- statutory culture schooldecisive»stärka kulturskolan och inrätta en kulturskolelag.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“strengthen the culture school and establish a culture school law.”
- culture school regardless of family economy»Alla barn ska ha möjlighet att utöva kultur inom någon form av kulturskola oavsett familjens ekonomiska förutsättningar.« (party programme ↗)“All children shall have the opportunity to engage in culture through some form of culture school regardless of their family's economic circumstances.”
- equitable access to culture»utöva och ta del av kultur på jämlika villkor.« (party programme ↗)“engage in and enjoy culture on equal terms.”
- state responsibility across the country»De statliga kulturinstitutionerna ska ha ett tydligt uppdrag att tillgängliggöra sin verksamhet i hela landet.« (party programme ↗)“State cultural institutions shall have a clear mandate to make their activities accessible throughout the country.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan makes access to culture throughout the country an explicit starting point and wants state cultural institutions to spread their activities across the country.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan makes access to culture throughout the country an explicit starting point and wants state cultural institutions to spread their activities across the country. That participation in culture school is strongly linked to parents' level of education is precisely the injustice that the party programme wants to even out. A greater state responsibility for equitable access therefore follows from the plan, even if implementation according to the plan should occur near people.
Original (Swedish)
Planen gör tillgång till kultur i hela landet till en uttalad utgångspunkt och vill att statliga kulturinstitutioner sprider sin verksamhet över landet. Att deltagandet i kulturskolan är starkt kopplat till föräldrarnas utbildningsnivå är precis den orättvisa som partiprogrammet vill utjämna. Ett större statligt ansvar för jämlik tillgång följer därför av planen, även om utförandet enligt planen ska ske nära människorna.
- culture throughout the countrydecisive»Att tillhandahålla kultur i hela landet är en viktig utgångspunkt för Centerpartiet. Kulturen ska vara fri och oberoende, idrotten jämlik och inkluderande.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Providing culture throughout the country is an important starting point for the Centre Party. Culture should be free and independent, sports equitable and inclusive.”
- even out injustices in upbringing»När vi stärker möjligheterna för dem som har det sämst lyfter vi hela samhället.« (party programme ↗)“When we strengthen opportunities for those who have the least, we lift the whole society.”
- state responsibility for spreading»Statliga kulturinstitutioner ska sprida sin verksamhet i hela landet.« (party programme ↗)“State cultural institutions shall spread their activities throughout the country.”
- equitable access for all children»Vi vill göra förskola och fritidsverksamhet tillgänglig för alla« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to make preschool and after-school activities accessible to all”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan wants the quality of cultural school to be secured nationally through a new knowledge center and that Sweden is a model regarding culture for children and young people.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants the quality of cultural school to be secured nationally through a new knowledge center and that Sweden is a model regarding culture for children and young people. The public shall at all levels increase the accessibility of culture, and the plan prefers to shift financing responsibility to the state rather than accept that conditions be determined by place of residence. Greater state responsibility for an equal cultural school therefore follows from the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill att kvaliteten i kulturskolan säkras nationellt genom ett nytt kunskapscentrum och att Sverige är ett föredöme i fråga om kultur för barn och unga. Det offentliga ska på alla nivåer öka kulturens tillgänglighet, och planen flyttar hellre finansieringsansvar till staten än accepterar att villkoren avgörs av bostadsort. Ett större statligt ansvar för en jämlik kulturskola följer därför av planen.
- national responsibility for cultural schooldecisive»kvaliteten i kulturskolan ska säkras genom skapandet av ett nationellt« (party programme ↗)“the quality of cultural school shall be secured through the creation of a national”
- increased cultural accessibility»Det offentliga ska på alla nivåer gynna mångfalden av kulturuttryck, öka kulturens tillgänglighet« (party programme ↗)“The public shall at all levels promote the diversity of cultural expression, increase the accessibility of culture”
- culture for children and young people»Sverige ska vara ett föredöme på området kultur av och för barn och ungdomar.« (party programme ↗)“Sweden shall be a model in the area of culture by and for children and young people.”
- state financing responsibility»Vi vill skapa mer likvärdiga villkor och skatter genom att flytta finansieringsansvaret för bland annat skolan och LSS till staten.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to create more equal conditions and taxes by transferring financing responsibility for, among other things, school and LSS to the state.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The party programme places on the state the responsibility for a cultural infrastructure throughout the country and sets as an aim that all Sweden shall prosper, while the election manifesto prioritizes society's youngest.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme places on the state the responsibility for a cultural infrastructure throughout the country and sets as an aim that all Sweden shall prosper, while the election manifesto prioritizes society's youngest. The counter-proposal's requirement for greater state responsibility for an equitable culture school follows from these commitments when participation today depends on parents' educational level and supply varies between municipalities. The subsidiarity principle, however, calls for restraint in detailed control of municipalities.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet lägger på staten ansvaret för en kulturell infrastruktur i hela landet och sätter som mål att hela Sverige ska leva, medan valmanifestet prioriterar samhällets yngsta. Motförslagets krav på ett större statligt ansvar för en jämlik kulturskola följer av dessa åtaganden när deltagandet i dag beror på föräldrarnas utbildningsnivå och utbudet varierar mellan kommuner. Subsidiaritetsprincipen manar dock till återhållsamhet med detaljstyrning av kommunerna.
- state cultural infrastructuredecisive»en kulturell infrastruktur, i hela landet.« (party programme ↗)“a cultural infrastructure, throughout the country.”
- prioritize children and young people»Vi prioriterar samhällets äldsta och yngsta, dem som inte längre orkar höja sin röst eller ännu inte lärt sig att använda den.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We prioritize society's oldest and youngest, those who no longer have the strength to raise their voice or have not yet learned to use it.”
- the whole country shall function»Målet är att hela Sverige ska leva« (party programme ↗)“The aim is that all Sweden shall prosper”
- subsidiarity in cultural decisions»Rätt makt på rätt plats« (party programme ↗)“Right power in the right place”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan contains no commitment to expanded state responsibility for cultural schooling and instead asserts that policy must prioritize and reject when the legal system, defense and welfare require large resources.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan contains no commitment to expanded state responsibility for cultural schooling and instead asserts that policy must prioritize and reject when the legal system, defense and welfare require large resources. The documents also want decisions to be made as close to citizens as possible, which speaks against moving responsibility for cultural schooling upward to the state. Greater state engagement is of the kind that according to the plan weakens society.
Original (Swedish)
Planen innehåller inget åtagande om ett utökat statligt ansvar för kulturskolan och slår i stället fast att politiken måste prioritera och välja bort när rättsväsende, försvar och välfärd kräver stora resurser. Dokumenten vill också att beslut fattas så nära medborgarna som möjligt, vilket talar mot att flytta ansvaret för kulturskolan uppåt till staten. Ett större statligt åtagande är av det slag som enligt planen försvagar samhället.
- decisions close to citizensdecisive»Beslut ska fattas på lägsta möjliga nivå, så nära medborgarna som möjligt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Decisions should be made at the lowest possible level, as close to citizens as possible.”
- politics must prioritize»Politiken har en viktig uppgift att prioritera och välja bort,« (party programme ↗)“Politics has an important task to prioritize and reject,”
- core mission comes first»De stora behoven inom rättsväsendet, försvaret och välfärden ställer stora krav på prioriteringar under åren som kommer.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Large needs within the legal system, defense and welfare place major demands on prioritization in the years to come.”
- limited state engagement»En stor stat leder till ett svagare samhälle.« (party programme ↗)“A large state leads to a weaker society.”
The party programme establishes that municipal self-determination must constantly be balanced against the principle that all citizens have the right to equivalent welfare and public services, and advocates state stewardship of schools precisely to guarantee equivalence.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme establishes that municipal self-determination must constantly be balanced against the principle that all citizens have the right to equivalent welfare and public services, and advocates state stewardship of schools precisely to guarantee equivalence. The counter-proposal's demand for greater state responsibility for an equitable culture school throughout the country follows from that principle. The plan also wants everyone to have access to leisure activities regardless of background.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet slår fast att det kommunala självbestämmandet ständigt måste balanseras mot principen att alla medborgare har rätt till en likvärdig välfärd och samhällsservice, och förespråkar statligt huvudmannaskap för skolan just för att garantera likvärdighet. Motförslagets krav på ett större statligt ansvar för en jämlik kulturskola i hela landet följer av den principen. Planen vill också att alla ska ha tillgång till fritidsverksamhet oavsett bakgrund.
- equivalent welfare throughout the countrydecisive»Vi betraktar det kommunala självbestämmandet som en central del av demokratin, men inser samtidigt att kommunernas naturliga intresse av att söka egna lösningar och göra egna prioriteringar ständigt måste balanseras mot principen om att alla svenska medborgare skall ha rätt till en likvärdig välfärd och samhällsservice.« (party programme ↗)“We regard municipal self-determination as a central part of democracy, but simultaneously recognize that municipalities' natural interest in seeking their own solutions and making their own priorities must constantly be balanced against the principle that all Swedish citizens shall have the right to equivalent welfare and public services.”
- state responsibility for equivalence»Samtidigt som Sverigedemokraterna förespråkar att staten återtar huvudmannaskapet för skolan, framförallt för att garantera en jämbördig skolgång för våra elever« (party programme ↗)“While Sweden Democrats advocate that the state reclaims stewardship of schools, above all to guarantee an equitable school experience for our pupils”
- all of Sweden shall thrive»Principen om att hela Sverige skall leva är mycket viktig för Sverigedemokraterna.« (party programme ↗)“The principle that all of Sweden shall thrive is very important to Sweden Democrats.”
- equitable access to leisure activities»Ge alla tillgång till idrott oavsett kön, ålder eller kulturell bakgrund« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Give everyone access to sports regardless of gender, age or cultural background”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2023/24:KrU8)
- Committee report full text (HB01KrU8)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2023/24:1161 — Semester på landet en möjlighet för alla av Staffan Eklöf (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:1488 — Offentliga satsningar på musik av Mirja Räihä och Per-Arne Håkansson (båda S)
- Motion 2023/24:1522 — Säkra upphovsrätten i ljuset av AI av Amanda Lind m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2023/24:1801 — Inrättande av en nationell Astrid Lindgren-dag av Gudrun Brunegård (KD)
- Motion 2023/24:1975 — Rika och jämlika möjligheter att delta i kulturskolan av Linus Sköld och Ida Karkiainen (båda S)
- Motion 2023/24:2038 — Jämlik tillgång till kulturskola av Sanna Backeskog m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2023/24:2447 — Barns och ungas tillgång till kultur av Amanda Lind m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2023/24:2451 — Utbildning och forskning för ett hållbart samhälle av Camilla Hansén m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2023/24:2483 — Kultur, civilsamhälle, idrott och medier i hela landet av Catarina Deremar m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2023/24:2664 — Jämställdhetspolitisk motion av Janine Alm Ericson m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2023/24:2686 — Utgiftsområde 17 Kultur, medier, trossamfund och fritid av Lawen Redar m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2023/24:272 — Tillkännage mottagare av litteraturpriset till Astrid Lindgrens minne (Alma) i Astrid Lindgrens stad Vimmerby av Gudrun Brunegård (KD)
- Motion 2023/24:988 — Kulturarvet av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)
Source: The Swedish Parliament