2026-04-152025/26:SoU18 · p.2SoUHealth & social services

Measures for economic needs

Statistics, children's right to assistance, and calculation of the norm within income support

What's at stake: The decision concerns people who depend on income support, not least children in vulnerable families, and how needs assessment and support levels are designed can affect their financial security.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

The question is whether parliament should now decide on national statistics on income-support applications, an independent right to financial assistance for children, and a review of how the norm is calculated, or whether the government's ongoing benefits reform is sufficient.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The committee points to the government's ongoing benefits reform, including an activity requirement, a benefits cap, and a new calculation of the norm, which is being processed in bills within the committee, and considers that the motions on statistics, children's right to assistance, and the norm should not be approved at this stage.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 5 (V)

The reservation wants the government to introduce national statistics on applications for and rejections of income support, investigate an independent right to financial assistance for children regardless of their parents' entitlement, and review the method for calculating and adjusting the norm in coordination with other benefits.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 5 by V.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
Vown reservationNoNo 0/18/0/4follows the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
SNoAbstain 1/0/90/15departs from the planconfidence: mediumderived
MPNoAbstain 0/0/15/3departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
CNoYes 20/0/0/4departs from the planconfidence: lowderived
LYesYes 13/0/0/3follows the planconfidence: lowderived
KDNoYes 16/0/0/3departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed
MYesYes 56/0/0/10follows the planconfidence: mediumderived
SDYesYes 61/0/0/9follows the planconfidence: mediumderived

Broke with the party line

SMikael Dahlqvist (S, Värmlands län)Yes — party line: Abstain

MPs whose vote differs from their party's majority position in this division. Marked with a dark ring in the chamber view.

Committee proposal

Parliament rejects the motions 2025/26:1345 by Hans Eklind and Lili André (both KD), 2025/26:1533 by Emma Ahlström Köster (M) demands 3 and 4, 2025/26:2816 by Maj Karlsson et al. (V) demands 24-26, 2025/26:3502 by Malte Tängmark Roos et al. (MP) demand 16, 2025/26:3590 by Ardalan Shekarabi et al. (S) demand 5 and 2025/26:3645 by Fredrik Lundh Sammeli et al. (S) demand 128.

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2025/26:1345 av Hans Eklind och Lili André (båda KD), 2025/26:1533 av Emma Ahlström Köster (M) yrkandena 3 och 4, 2025/26:2816 av Maj Karlsson m.fl. (V) yrkandena 24-26, 2025/26:3502 av Malte Tängmark Roos m.fl. (MP) yrkande 16, 2025/26:3590 av Ardalan Shekarabi m.fl. (S) yrkande 5 och 2025/26:3645 av Fredrik Lundh Sammeli m.fl. (S) yrkande 128.

Riksdag decision: Parliament rejected 101 proposals in motions from the general motion period of 2025 concerning social services work. The proposals deal with, among other things, social services work, measures for individuals, homelessness, and international adoptions. Parliament primarily refers to the fact that work is already underway in the areas that the proposals address.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietNoNofollows the plannot addressed

The plan requires universal welfare with a high minimum level and that children, the sick and the unemployed should have the same right to good lives as the working.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan requires universal welfare with a high minimum level and that children, the sick and the unemployed should have the same right to good lives as the working. The counter-proposal's requirements for national statistics, an independent right to assistance for children and a review of the national standard aim at exactly that: that the lower protection level actually holds and that child poverty is made visible. The plan particularly points out that many children grow up in poverty.

Original (Swedish)

Planen kräver en generell välfärd med hög lägsta nivå och att barn, sjuka och arbetslösa ska ha samma rätt till goda liv som arbetande. Motförslagets krav på nationell statistik, en självständig rätt till bistånd för barn och en översyn av riksnormen syftar till just det: att den nedre skyddsnivån faktiskt håller och att barnfattigdomen synliggörs. Planen pekar särskilt ut att många barn växer upp i fattigdom.

  • high minimum level in welfaredecisive»En generell välfärd med en hög lägsta nivå är en helt avgörande strategi för att samla människor« (party programme ↗)“Universal welfare with a high minimum level is an absolutely crucial strategy for bringing people together”
  • equal right to good lives»Barn, sjuka och arbetslösa måste självklart ha samma rätt som arbetande människor att ha goda liv.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Children, the sick and the unemployed must of course have the same right as working people to have good lives.”
  • counteract child poverty»Många barn växer upp i fattigdom« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Many children grow up in poverty”
  • society is there when needed»Vi vill bygga ett samhälle som alltid finns där för den som behöver det.« (party programme ↗)“We want to build a society that is always there for those who need it.”
SSocialdemokraternaNoAbstaindeparts from the planderived

The plan demands a society where children do not grow up in poverty and a social safety net throughout life.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan demands a society where children do not grow up in poverty and a social safety net throughout life. National statistics on applications and rejections, an independent right to assistance for children and a review of the calculation of the national standard are means to ensure that the safety net reaches and can be followed up. The plan simultaneously demands activity requirements for income support, which does not prevent these measures.

Original (Swedish)

Planen kräver ett samhälle där barn inte växer upp i fattigdom och ett socialt skyddsnät genom hela livet. Nationell statistik över ansökningar och avslag, en självständig rätt till bistånd för barn och en översyn av riksnormens beräkning är medel för att skyddsnätet ska nå fram och kunna följas upp. Planen kräver samtidigt aktivitetskrav för försörjningsstöd, vilket inte hindrar dessa åtgärder.

  • no children in povertydecisive»Ett samhälle där barn inte växer upp i fattigdom.« (party programme ↗)“A society where children do not grow up in poverty.”
  • robust safety net»Socialt skyddsnät under hela livet, med robusta socialförsäkringar och stöd till dem« (party programme ↗)“Social safety net throughout life, with robust social insurance and support for”
  • gap-closing social policy»En socialpolitik som utjämnar klyftor och frigör människor.« (party programme ↗)“A social policy that closes gaps and frees people.”
  • activity requirements for income support»För att ingen ska fastna i passivitet behöver det ställas krav på aktivitet för att få försörjningsstöd.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“To prevent anyone from getting stuck in passivity, there must be activity requirements to receive income support.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MPMiljöpartietNoAbstaindeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan requires that benefits in security systems are sufficiently high for a dignified standard of living and that economic vulnerability shall not run in families.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan requires that benefits in security systems are sufficiently high for a dignified standard of living and that economic vulnerability shall not run in families. National statistics over applications and rejections, an independent right to support for children and a review of the national norm are tools to ensure precisely this. The plan also wants fewer to be referred to municipal support.

Original (Swedish)

Planen kräver att ersättningarna i trygghetssystemen är tillräckligt höga för en värdig levnadsstandard och att ekonomisk utsatthet inte ska gå i arv. Nationell statistik över ansökningar och avslag, en självständig rätt till bistånd för barn och en översyn av riksnormen är verktyg för att säkra just detta. Planen vill också att färre ska hänvisas till kommunalt försörjningsstöd.

  • dignified benefit levelsdecisive»Ersättningarna i trygghetssystemen ska vara tillräckligt höga för att säkerställa en värdig« (party programme ↗)“Benefits in security systems shall be sufficiently high to ensure a dignified”
  • no child poverty»Ekonomisk utsatthet ska inte gå i arv.« (party programme ↗)“Economic vulnerability shall not run in families.”
  • no one falls between the cracks»Personer som blir arbetslösa ska inte behöva stå utan ersättning från« (party programme ↗)“Those who become unemployed shall not need to stand without benefit from”
  • strengthened finances for vulnerable»höja bostadsbidraget för barnfamiljer och bostadstillägget för pensionärer.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“raise housing support for families with children and housing supplement for pensioners.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

CCenterpartietNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The party programme requires that basic security be so comprehensive that no one falls through the safety nets and that children's rights carry the most weight.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The party programme requires that basic security be so comprehensive that no one falls through the safety nets and that children's rights carry the most weight. Better statistics, a review of children's independent right to assistance, and a review of the national standard's calculation method aim at precisely that. At the same time, the plan emphasizes that benefit dependency shall be counteracted, which makes the support weak.

Original (Swedish)

Partiprogrammet kräver att den grundläggande tryggheten är så heltäckande att ingen faller igenom skyddsnäten och att barnens rättigheter väger tyngst. Bättre statistik, en prövning av barns självständiga rätt till bistånd och en översyn av riksnormens beräkningsmetod syftar till just det. Samtidigt betonar planen att bidragsberoende ska motverkas, vilket gör stödet svagt.

  • no one shall fall throughdecisive»Den grundläggande tryggheten måste vara så heltäckande att ingen tillåts falla igenom skyddsnäten« (party programme ↗)“Basic security must be so comprehensive that no one is allowed to fall through the safety nets”
  • the child's perspective first»Av största betydelse är då barnens rättigheter och perspektiv.« (party programme ↗)“Of paramount importance are then the rights and perspective of children.”
  • the work line before benefits»Mer pengar ska läggas på välfärdens kärna, mindre på bidrag.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“More money shall be put on welfare's core, less on benefits.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

LLiberalernaYesYesfollows the planderived

The plan's line for economic assistance is a benefit cap and a daily allowance with a clear requirement for work in return, where maintenance support shall lead back to self-support.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan's line for economic assistance is a benefit cap and a daily allowance with a clear requirement for work in return, where maintenance support shall lead back to self-support. An independent assistance right for children and an indexing of the national standard in coordination with other benefits pulls in the opposite direction. The plan, however, gives support for targeted support to economically weak families with children, which makes the assessment uncertain.

Original (Swedish)

Planens linje för det ekonomiska biståndet är ett bidragstak och en dagersättning med tydligt krav på motprestation, där försörjningsstödet ska leda tillbaka till självförsörjning. En självständig biståndsrätt för barn och en uppräkning av riksnormen i samordning med andra ersättningar drar åt motsatt håll. Planen ger däremot stöd för riktat stöd till ekonomiskt svaga barnfamiljer, vilket gör bedömningen osäker.

  • benefit capdecisive»Därför vill vi modernisera bidragssystemet genom ett bidragstak – de samlade bidragen ska inte kunna vara högre än de lägsta kollektivavtalade lönerna.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Therefore we want to modernize the benefits system through a benefit cap – total benefits shall not be able to be higher than the lowest collectively agreed wages.”
  • maintenance support toward self-support»Försörjningsstöd ska syfta till att hjälpa individer tillbaka till självförsörjning.« (party programme ↗)“Maintenance support shall aim to help individuals back to self-support.”
  • work requirement for assistance»Vi vill införa en ny dagersättning för arbetsföra personer med ett tydligt krav på motprestation i form av anvisat arbete, språkutbildning eller annan kompetenshöjande verksamhet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to introduce a new daily allowance for work-capable people with a clear requirement for work in return in the form of assigned work, language training or other competence-raising activity.”
  • targeted support to families with children»Barnfamiljer med låg inkomst och hög boendekostnad ska kunna få särskilt stöd.« (party programme ↗)“Families with children with low income and high housing costs shall be able to get special support.”
KDKristdemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan makes the public ultimately responsible for everyone being able to live a secure and dignified life and establishes that children have the right to a safe growing environment with the child's best interest guiding decisions concerning children, which supports the requirements for statistics, review of the national norm and a tested independent right for children.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan makes the public ultimately responsible for everyone being able to live a secure and dignified life and establishes that children have the right to a safe growing environment with the child's best interest guiding decisions concerning children, which supports the requirements for statistics, review of the national norm and a tested independent right for children. At the same time, the plan requires that benefit dependency be countered, which makes support for an expanded welfare right uncertain. Follow-up and evaluation are according to the plan an important political task.

Original (Swedish)

Planen gör det offentliga ytterst ansvarigt för att alla ska kunna leva ett tryggt och värdigt liv och slår fast att barn har rätt till en trygg uppväxtmiljö med barnets bästa som styrande vid beslut som rör barn, vilket bär kraven på statistik, översyn av riksnormen och en prövad självständig rätt för barn. Samtidigt kräver planen att bidragsberoende motverkas, vilket gör stödet för en utvidgad biståndsrätt osäkert. Uppföljning och utvärdering är enligt planen en viktig politisk uppgift.

  • ultimate responsibility for secure provisiondecisive»Men det offentliga är ytterst ansvarigt för att alla ska kunna leva ett« (party programme ↗)“But the public is ultimately responsible for everyone being able to live a”
  • children's right to security»Barn har rätt till en trygg uppväxtmiljö.« (party programme ↗)“Children have the right to a safe environment for growing up.”
  • follow-up as a political task»kostnadsuppföljning och kvalitetskontroll är därför viktiga politiska uppgifter.« (party programme ↗)“cost monitoring and quality control are therefore important political tasks.”
  • counter benefit dependency»uppmuntras, och att bidragsberoende motverkas.« (party programme ↗)“are encouraged, and that benefit dependency is countered.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MModeraternaYesYesfollows the planderived

The plan's line for maintenance support is demands and caps: benefit caps so combined benefits never exceed income from work, full-time activity as a condition and home visits to detect misconduct.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan's line for maintenance support is demands and caps: benefit caps so combined benefits never exceed income from work, full-time activity as a condition and home visits to detect misconduct. A self-standing right to economic assistance for children independent of parents' right and a raising of the national norm would undermine precisely that work line. The counter-proposal's demands thus go against the plan.

Original (Swedish)

Planens linje för försörjningsstödet är krav och tak: bidragstak så att de samlade bidragen aldrig överstiger lönen från ett arbete, heltidsaktivitet som villkor och hembesök för att upptäcka missförhållanden. En självständig rätt till ekonomiskt bistånd för barn oberoende av föräldrarnas rätt och en uppskrivning av riksnormen skulle underminera just den arbetslinjen. Motförslagets krav ligger därför emot planen.

  • benefit capdecisive»Införa ett bidragstak så att de samlade bidragen aldrig kan bli högre än lönen från ett arbete« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Introduce a benefit cap so that combined benefits can never exceed income from work”
  • full-time requirement for benefits»Kräva aktivitet på heltid av den som lever på försörjningsstöd« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Demand activity on full-time basis from the person living on maintenance support”
  • work must always pay»De samlade bidragen ska aldrig bli så höga att det inte lönar sig att jobba.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Combined benefits shall never be so high that it does not pay to work.”
  • work line in benefit system»Skatter och bidragssystem ska utgå från arbetslinjen.« (party programme ↗)“Taxes and benefit systems shall be based on the work line.”
SDSverigedemokraternaYesYesfollows the planderived

The plan's line for maintenance support is opposite to the counter-proposal's: work obligation shall become a condition for those maintained through municipal maintenance support and it shall become harder to exploit Swedish welfare.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan's line for maintenance support is opposite to the counter-proposal's: work obligation shall become a condition for those maintained through municipal maintenance support and it shall become harder to exploit Swedish welfare. An independent right to assistance for children and an uprating of the national standard would broaden and raise assistance instead of tightening conditions. The statistics requirement in itself is silent on in the plan.

Original (Swedish)

Planens linje för försörjningsstödet är motsatt motförslagets: arbetsplikt ska bli ett villkor för den som försörjs genom kommunalt försörjningsstöd och det ska bli svårare att exploatera den svenska välfärden. En självständig rätt till bistånd för barn och en uppräkning av riksnormen skulle bredda och höja biståndet i stället för att skärpa villkoren. Statistikkravet i sig är planen tyst om.

  • work obligation for maintenance supportdecisive»Arbetsplikt ska också bli ett villkor för personer som idag blir försörjda genom det kommunala försörjningsstödet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Work obligation shall also become a condition for persons today maintained through municipal maintenance support.”
  • requirements for benefits»Inför arbetsplikt för bidrag« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Introduce work obligation for benefits”
  • tightened welfare protection»Göra det svårare att exploatera den svenska välfärden« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Make it harder to exploit Swedish welfare”
  • raised threshold to welfare»Skärpa villkoren för medborgarskap och höja tröskeln för att ta del av skattefinansierad välfärd« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Tighten conditions for citizenship and raise the threshold for taking part in tax-financed welfare”

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament