2026-06-032025/26:UbU24 · p.7UbUEducation
Implementation of support education
Implementation of support teaching and class sizes
What's at stake: The decision affects how much time and attention each pupil can actually receive from the teacher, and thus whether support teaching works as intended for pupils with differing needs. It also concerns teachers' working environment and whether class sizes can be allowed to grow freely for municipal savings or the profit interests of independent schools.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the support-teaching reform should be implemented without any national regulation of class and group sizes, or whether the government should instead investigate such regulation so that support teaching achieves its intended effect.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee shares the government's view that the support-teaching proposals strengthen the quality of teaching, partly because the support is time-limited and followed up and because standardised tests are introduced at more stages, meaning pupils in need of support are identified earlier. It also considers that the option of organising teaching in smaller settings can increase accessibility, without this meaning that class and group sizes need to be specifically regulated.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 12 (V)
The reservation (V) calls for the government to proceed with an earlier inquiry proposal to regulate class and group sizes in the school system at national level. The reasoning is that the teacher needs a reasonable amount of time for each pupil for support teaching to have its intended effect, while in many places class sizes are instead increasing so that municipalities can save money and independent schools can extract profit, which also affects the working environment for pupils and teachers.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 12 by V.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | No 0/21/0/0 | follows the plan | confidence: high | derived |
| S | No | Yes 106/0/0/0 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| MP | No | Yes 18/0/0/0 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| C | Yes | Abstain 0/0/23/1 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| L | Yes | Yes 16/0/0/0 | follows the plan | confidence: low | derived |
| KD | Yes | Yes 19/0/0/0 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| M | Yes | Yes 66/0/0/0 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| SD | No | Yes 70/0/0/0 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | derived |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2025/26:3994 by Isabell Mixter et al. (V) request 1 and 2025/26:4035 by Niels Paarup-Petersen et al. (C) request 3.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2025/26:3994 av Isabell Mixter m.fl. (V) yrkande 1 och 2025/26:4035 av Niels Paarup-Petersen m.fl. (C) yrkande 3.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag voted yes to the Government's proposal aimed at improving support in schools. Among other things, it should be clarified in the Education Act that all children and students in teaching shall be given guidance and stimulation in order for them to be able to follow the teaching. The changes also mean that the regulation of the guarantee for early support measures and extra adjustments shall be abolished. Instead, standardized tests shall be conducted at the beginning of the autumn term in certain school years to identify students in need of support. Students shall be given support education at an early stage in the compulsory school forms, upper secondary school and adapted upper secondary school in the subjects Swedish, Swedish as a second language and mathematics. The changes also mean that teachers in municipal adult education shall have access to or possibility of consultation with staff with special education expertise. The changes to the Education Act come into force on 1 July 2028.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to appoint an investigation on the consequences of abolishing extra adjustments. (V) — Reservation 12
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan wants to see more teachers and more resources to school so that it can meet children according to their differences, which is precisely the motivation the counter-proposal gives for regulating class and group sizes.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to see more teachers and more resources to school so that it can meet children according to their differences, which is precisely the motivation the counter-proposal gives for regulating class and group sizes. The plan also affirms that tax revenue should not become profits for private school companies, which meets the counter-proposal's objection that classes grow to save money or take profit. The committee's reasons about smaller settings without special regulation are therefore directly addressed by the plan's resource requirements.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill se fler lärare och mer resurser till skolan så att den kan möta barn utifrån deras olikheter, vilket är precis den motivering motförslaget ger för att reglera klass- och gruppstorlekar. Planen slår också fast att skattemedel inte ska bli vinster hos privata skolbolag, vilket möter motförslagets invändning mot att klasserna växer för att spara pengar eller ta ut vinst. Utskottets skäl om mindre sammanhang utan särskild reglering träffas därför direkt av planens resurskrav.
- more resources for schoolsdecisive»Skolan måste också tillföras mer resurser, det är bara så vi kan skapa en skola som kan möta barn utifrån deras olikheter och skiftande behov.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Schools must also be allocated more resources, that is the only way we can create a school that can meet children according to their differences and varying needs.”
- more teachers per student»Vänsterpartiet vill se fler lärare, tidigare insatser för barn som har det kämpigt och förbättrad tillgång till lärande genom hela livet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Left Party wants to see more teachers, earlier interventions for children who are struggling and improved access to learning throughout life.”
- resources to students, not profits»Istället för pengar i fickan på de privata skolbolagen kan vi satsa på att alla barn ska få en bra utbildning.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Instead of money in the pockets of private school companies, we can invest in all children receiving a good education.”
- compensatory school»En skola som ger barn lika chanser är också kompensatorisk, det vill säga den förmår ge mer stöd till den som kommer från sämre förutsättningar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“A school that gives children equal opportunities is also compensatory, which means it can provide more support to the one who comes from poorer circumstances.”
The plan requires that resources stay in schools by ending market-based schools and prohibiting profit extraction from school operations, which directly addresses the counter-proposal's concern that class sizes grow to save costs or generate profits.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that resources stay in schools by ending market-based schools and prohibiting profit extraction from school operations, which directly addresses the counter-proposal's concern that class sizes grow to save costs or generate profits. The plan also demands increased state responsibility and greater state authority over education. National regulation of class and group sizes therefore aligns with the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att resurserna stannar i skolan genom ett stopp för marknadsskolan och att inga vinster tas ut på skolverksamhet, vilket är just motförslagets invändning mot att klasserna växer för att spara pengar eller ta ut vinst. Planen vill dessutom ha ökat statligt ansvar och stärkt rådighet på skolområdet. Nationell reglering av klass- och gruppindelning ligger därmed i linje med planen.
- state control of schoolsdecisive»Ökat statligt ansvar och stärkt rådighet på skolområdet.« (party programme ↗)“Increased state responsibility and strengthened state authority over education.”
- resources stay in schools»För det krävs mer resurser och att resurserna stannar i skolan genom ett stopp för marknadsskolan.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“For that, more resources are needed and resources must remain in schools through an end to market-based schools.”
- no profit in schools»Ingen vinst på skolverksamhet.« (party programme ↗)“No profit from school operations.”
- time for every student»Goda förutsättningar för skolan att klara sin kompensatoriska uppgift.« (party programme ↗)“Good conditions for schools to meet their compensatory task.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan wants to invest in smaller groups and more staff and states that the state shall be responsible for ensuring that every school has sufficient funding, while profit-seeking in schools shall be stopped.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to invest in smaller groups and more staff and states that the state shall be responsible for ensuring that every school has sufficient funding, while profit-seeking in schools shall be stopped. The counter-proposal wants to regulate class and group sizes nationally so that teachers get reasonable time per pupil and so sizes do not increase to save money or extract profit. This is in line with the plan, which does not, however, require national regulation.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill satsa på mindre barngrupper och mer personal och slår fast att staten ska ansvara för att varje skola har tillräcklig finansiering, samtidigt som vinstjakten i skolan ska stoppas. Motförslaget vill reglera klass- och gruppstorlekar nationellt just för att lärare ska få rimlig tid per elev och för att storlekarna inte ska öka för att spara pengar eller ta ut vinst. Det ligger i linje med planen, som dock inte kräver nationell reglering.
- smaller groupsdecisive»satsa på mindre barngrupper och mer personal i förskolan.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“invest in smaller groups and more staff in preschools.”
- end to profit-seeking in schools»sätta stopp för vinstjakten i skolan« (2022 manifesto ↗)“put an end to profit-seeking in schools”
- state funding responsibility»Staten ska ansvara för att varje skola har tillräcklig finansiering för att säkra att alla barn får de bästa möjligheterna till lärande och utveckling.« (party programme ↗)“The state shall be responsible for ensuring that every school has sufficient funding to secure that all children get the best opportunities for learning and development.”
- time to see each pupil»Vi vill se en tillitsstyrd skola där lärare, rektorer och elevhälsa ges förtroende och tid att göra sitt jobb och se varje elev.« (party programme ↗)“We want to see a trust-based school where teachers, headteachers and student welfare are given confidence and time to do their job and see each pupil.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan is based on decentralization: people should decide more themselves and decisions are made near those affected, and legislation on schools should offer great freedom to solve the task locally.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan is based on decentralization: people should decide more themselves and decisions are made near those affected, and legislation on schools should offer great freedom to solve the task locally. A national regulation of class and group sizes runs directly counter to it. The plan's answer to teaching quality is instead strict quality requirements and better support and continuing education for teachers.
Original (Swedish)
Planen bygger på decentralisering: människor ska bestämma mer själva och besluten fattas nära dem som berörs, och lagstiftning om skolan ska erbjuda stor frihet att lösa uppgiften lokalt. En nationell reglering av klass- och gruppstorlekar går rakt emot det. Planens svar på undervisningskvaliteten är i stället strikta kvalitetskrav och bättre stöd och fortbildning för lärare.
- decisions near those affecteddecisive»Decentralisera mera. Människor ska få bestämma mer själva, och politiska beslut ska fattas nära dem som berörs.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Decentralize more. People should be able to decide more themselves, and political decisions should be made near those affected.”
- local freedom in schools»Lagstiftning och regelverk måste erbjuda stor frihet« (party programme ↗)“Legislation and regulations must offer great freedom”
- quality requirements over detailed regulation»Styrningen av skolan ska kännetecknas av strikta kvalitetskrav och likvärdighet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“School governance shall be characterized by strict quality requirements and equivalence.”
- support to teachers over regulation»Det vill vi åstadkomma med bättre stöd och fortbildning för lärare och rektorer, och rätt stöd till alla elever.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to achieve this with better support and continuing education for teachers and rectors, and proper support for all students.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan calls for increased opportunities for teaching in smaller groups and more special teaching groups, but formulates this as possibilities for schools rather than as national regulation of class and group sizes.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan calls for increased opportunities for teaching in smaller groups and more special teaching groups, but formulates this as possibilities for schools rather than as national regulation of class and group sizes. The plan's answer to support needs is more special education teachers and early, scientifically-based interventions. Added to this is explicit scepticism toward increased public authority claims, which is why the counter-proposal's requirement for national regulation gets no support.
Original (Swedish)
Planen efterlyser ökade möjligheter till undervisning i mindre grupper och fler särskilda undervisningsgrupper, men formulerar detta som möjligheter för skolan snarare än som en nationell reglering av klass- och gruppstorlekar. Planens svar på stödbehov är fler speciallärare och tidiga, vetenskapligt grundade insatser. Till detta kommer en uttalad skepsis mot ökade offentliga maktanspråk, varför motförslagets krav på nationell reglering inte får stöd.
- opportunities for smaller groupsdecisive»Det behövs ökade möjligheter att gå i mindre grupper, så att elever med större behov av stöd kan få det och elever i behov av mer avancerade uppgifter kan få det.« (party programme ↗)“There is a need for increased opportunities to attend smaller groups, so that students with greater support needs can get it and students needing more advanced work can get it.”
- special teaching groups»Därför vill vi se fler särskilda undervisningsgrupper utanför det vanliga klassrummet, för att elever som annars stökar och stör ska få bättre chanser.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Therefore we want to see more special teaching groups outside the regular classroom, so that students who otherwise disrupt can get better chances.”
- early and evidence-based support»Stödinsatser sättas in tidigt och vara vetenskapligt grundade.« (party programme ↗)“Support interventions are implemented early and are scientifically-based.”
- scepticism toward detailed control»I det liberala samhället är vaksamhet på hur den offentliga makten utövas, och en sund skepsis mot ökade offentliga maktanspråk, därför en självklarhet.« (party programme ↗)“In the liberal society, vigilance about how public authority is exercised and a healthy scepticism toward increased public authority claims are therefore self-evident.”
The plan gives schools a great degree of freedom to design their own teaching and is based on the subsidiarity principle, that what a lower level can handle should also get to handle.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan gives schools a great degree of freedom to design their own teaching and is based on the subsidiarity principle, that what a lower level can handle should also get to handle. A national regulation of class and group division moves the decision upward without the burden of proof for better appropriateness being fulfilled. The plan's requirement that group sizes must accommodate each child's needs qualifies but applies to preschool and is not a requirement for national regulation.
Original (Swedish)
Planen ger skolorna ett stort mått av frihet att själva utforma undervisningen och bygger på subsidiaritetsprincipen, att det en lägre nivå klarar av ska den också få sköta. En nationell reglering av klass- och gruppindelning flyttar beslutet uppåt utan att bevisbördan för bättre ändamålsenlighet är uppfylld. Planens krav på att gruppstorlekar ska rymma varje barns behov kvalificerar men gäller förskolan och är inget krav på nationell reglering.
- school freedomdecisive»ska de ges ett stort mått av frihet att själva utforma undervisningen« (party programme ↗)“they should be given a great degree of freedom to design their own teaching”
- the subsidiarity principle»Det en gemenskap på ett ändamålsenligt sätt kan sköta ska den också få sköta.« (party programme ↗)“What a community can handle in an appropriate way should also get to handle.”
- municipal self-governance»Kommunal demokrati förutsätter kommunal självstyrelse.« (party programme ↗)“Municipal democracy presupposes municipal self-governance.”
- reasonable group sizes»Gruppstorlekarna får inte vara större än att varje barn kan få sina behov tillgodosedda.« (party programme ↗)“Group sizes must not be larger than that each child can have their needs met.”
The plan wants decisions to be made at the lowest effective level and that the state above all establishes and monitors knowledge requirements, not detailed regulations for how instruction is organized.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants decisions to be made at the lowest effective level and that the state above all establishes and monitors knowledge requirements, not detailed regulations for how instruction is organized. The counter-proposal demands instead national regulation of class and group sizes. The plan's answer to weak results is early interventions such as vacation school and homework help, not centrally determined group sizes.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill att beslut fattas på lägsta effektiva nivå och att staten framför allt fastställer och följer upp kunskapskrav, inte detaljreglerar hur undervisningen organiseras. Motförslaget kräver tvärtom nationell reglering av klass- och gruppstorlekar. Planens svar på svaga resultat är tidiga insatser som lovskola och läxhjälp, inte centralt bestämda gruppstorlekar.
- decisions at lowest effective leveldecisive»Det politiska systemet ska bygga på att beslut fattas på lägsta« (party programme ↗)“The political system shall be based on decisions being made at the lowest”
- state sets requirements, not organization»Staten har en avgörande uppgift att först och främst fastställa och följa upp tydliga kunskapskrav.« (party programme ↗)“The state has a crucial task to first and foremost establish and monitor clear knowledge requirements.”
- early interventions crucial»Forskning pekar på att tidiga insatser är avgörande för att höja kunskapsresultaten.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Research shows that early interventions are crucial for raising knowledge results.”
- support through vacation school»Införa en skyldighet för kommuner att erbjuda lovskola från lågstadiet. Elever som ligger efter i skolan ska vara skyldiga att delta i lovskolan« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Introduce a requirement for municipalities to offer vacation school from primary school. Students who are behind in school shall be required to participate in vacation school”
The plan requires a ceiling on the number of children per adult and that premises be designed for the correct number of children, and establishes in the party programme that child groups should be as small as possible.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires a ceiling on the number of children per adult and that premises be designed for the correct number of children, and establishes in the party programme that child groups should be as small as possible. The counter-proposal's requirement for national regulation of class and group divisions is based on the same principle: the teacher needs reasonable time for each student. The plan's stated commitment applies to childcare, so the conclusion for the school system is derived.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver en maxgräns för antalet barn per vuxen och att lokaler utformas för rätt antal barn, och slår i partiprogrammet fast att barngrupperna ska vara så små som möjligt. Motförslagets krav på nationell reglering av klass- och gruppindelning bygger på samma princip: läraren behöver rimlig tid för varje elev. Planens uttalade åtagande gäller dock barnomsorgen, varför slutsatsen för skolväsendet är härledd.
- ceiling per adultdecisive»Upprätta en maxgräns för antalet barn per vuxen« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Establish a ceiling on the number of children per adult”
- small child groups»Centralt inom alla former av barnomsorg är att barngrupperna skall vara så små som« (party programme ↗)“Central to all forms of childcare is that child groups shall be as small as”
- peace and quiet and individual support»En arbetsmiljö som ger utrymme för studiero, arbetsglädje och individuell hjälp till elever ska prioriteras.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“A working environment that provides scope for peace and quiet, joy in work and individual support for students shall be prioritized.”
- correct number of children per premises»Det är även av stor vikt att lokaler och utemiljöer är utformade för rätt antal barn.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It is also of great importance that premises and outdoor environments are designed for the correct number of children.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2025/26:UbU24)
- Committee report full text (HD01UbU24)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2025/26:3994 — med anledning av prop. 2025/26:195 Förbättrat stöd i skolan av Isabell Mixter m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2025/26:4019 — med anledning av prop. 2025/26:195 Förbättrat stöd i skolan av Anders Ygeman m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:4035 — med anledning av prop. 2025/26:195 Förbättrat stöd i skolan av Niels Paarup-Petersen m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2025/26:4048 — med anledning av prop. 2025/26:195 Förbättrat stöd i skolan av Camilla Hansén m.fl. (MP)
- Proposition 2025/26:195 — Förbättrat stöd i skolan
Source: The Swedish Parliament