2024-05-152023/24:UU10 · p.2UUForeign affairs
Sanctions against Russia
The EU's sanctions against Russia over the invasion of Ukraine
What's at stake: The decision affects the pressure on Russia's leadership and on the private military companies that support Russian warfare and repression, as well as how consistently Sweden sticks to the principle of only joining multilateral sanctions.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is how far Sweden and the EU should go in sanctioning Russia, including whether Sweden should be able to impose its own unilateral sanctions and whether Russian private military companies should be listed as terrorist organisations, or whether Sweden should continue to only take part in sanctions decided jointly by the UN or EU.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee rejects the motions, including the proposal for Sweden to impose its own unilateral sanctions on Russia. The reason is that the committee holds to the principle that Sweden only takes part in sanctions decided by the UN Security Council or the EU, while welcoming the extensive sanctions the EU has already imposed in coordination with the G7 and wanting further tightening.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 5 (S, MP)
The reservation (S, MP) calls for the government to act to maintain sanctions on Russian decision-makers and oligarchs, use frozen Russian assets for Ukraine's reconstruction, and have Russian private military companies listed as terrorist organisations. The reasoning is that these companies have committed serious abuses and finance themselves through plundering natural resources and other crime, and that their ties to the Russian state make Russia an international sponsor of terrorism.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 5 by S, MP.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have gone the other way
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: LLiberalerna, SDSverigedemokraterna
Ja 173–110Nej 98–185
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Yes 21/0/0/3 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| S | No | No 0/93/0/13 | match | confidence: medium | derived |
| MP | No | No 0/16/0/2 | match | confidence: medium | derived |
| C | No | Abstain 0/0/19/5 | differs | confidence: high | derived |
| L | No | Yes 14/0/0/2 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| KD | No | Yes 17/0/0/2 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| M | No | Yes 60/0/0/8 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| SD | No | Yes 61/0/0/11 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: medium | explicit |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2023/24:476 by Markus Wiechel et al. (SD) point 25, 2023/24:482 by Aron Emilsson et al. (SD) point 3, 2023/24:2466 by Kerstin Lundgren et al. (C) points 17 and 20, 2023/24:2562 by Morgan Johansson et al. (S) point 4 and 2023/24:2564 by Peter Hultqvist et al. (S) point 42.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2023/24:476 av Markus Wiechel m.fl. (SD) yrkande 25, 2023/24:482 av Aron Emilsson m.fl. (SD) yrkande 3, 2023/24:2466 av Kerstin Lundgren m.fl. (C) yrkandena 17 och 20, 2023/24:2562 av Morgan Johansson m.fl. (S) yrkande 4 och 2023/24:2564 av Peter Hultqvist m.fl. (S) yrkande 42.
Riksdag decision: The Government has submitted a report on activities in the EU in 2023. The Riksdag issues a directive, a so-called tillkännagivande (formal request), to the Government in response to motion points regarding a review of the rules for the EU's sanctions against terrorism. The Riksdag considers that the Government should work for the EU to update these rules so that it becomes easier to terrorist-list organizations that conduct state-sponsored terrorism. The Government should in this connection also work for the EU to terrorist-list the Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guard. The Riksdag places the Government's report on record, that is concludes the matter, and says no to other motions.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants the government to strengthen the EU's defense policy capacity and ability to act. (S, MP) — Reservation 5
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan takes a clear stance against states that wage wars of aggression and regimes that commit human rights violations, inter alia through a ban on arms exports to them.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan takes a clear stance against states that wage wars of aggression and regimes that commit human rights violations, inter alia through a ban on arms exports to them. It also wants violations of international law to be highlighted and countered and international law to be defended. Maintaining sanctions, using frozen assets for reconstruction and marking against Russian military companies' violations are in line with that.
Original (Swedish)
Planen tar tydlig ställning mot stater som för angreppskrig och regimer som begår brott mot de mänskliga rättigheterna, bland annat genom förbud mot vapenexport dit. Den vill också att brott mot internationell lag uppmärksammas och motverkas och att folkrätten försvaras. Att upprätthålla sanktionerna, använda frysta tillgångar till återuppbyggnad och markera mot ryska militärföretags övergrepp ligger i linje med det.
- tough line against wars of aggressiondecisive»förbjuda vapenexport till diktaturer, stater som för angreppskrig och« (party programme ↗)“prohibit arms exports to dictatorships, states that wage wars of aggression and”
- counter violations of international law»Genom FN får även små länder en röst och starka militärmakters brott mot internationell lag kan uppmärksammas och motverkas.« (party programme ↗)“Through the UN, even small countries have a voice and violations of international law by powerful military powers can be highlighted and countered.”
- accountability for human rights violations»regimer som begår brott mot de mänskliga rättigheterna.« (party programme ↗)“regimes that commit violations of human rights.”
- independence from great powers»Det är viktigt att Sverige kan agera självständigt från stormakter som« (party programme ↗)“It is important that Sweden can act independently from great powers such as”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto states that Sweden must stand up for Ukraine and against the Russian invasion at all times; maintaining sanctions against Russian decision-makers and using frozen assets for Ukraine's reconstruction is an application of that commitment.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto states that Sweden must stand up for Ukraine and against the Russian invasion at all times; maintaining sanctions against Russian decision-makers and using frozen assets for Ukraine's reconstruction is an application of that commitment. The party programme also demands that organized violence against civilians always be rejected. However, the plan does not specify the design of the sanctions.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet slår fast att Sverige i alla lägen ska stå upp för Ukraina och mot det ryska invasionskriget; att upprätthålla sanktionerna mot ryska beslutsfattare och använda frysta tillgångar för Ukrainas återuppbyggnad är en tillämpning av det åtagandet. Partiprogrammet kräver också att organiserat våld mot civilbefolkningen alltid avvisas. Planen preciserar dock inte sanktionernas utformning.
- support for Ukrainedecisive»Sverige måste i alla lägen stå upp för Ukraina och mot det ryska invasionskriget.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden must stand up for Ukraine and against the Russian invasion at all times.”
- respond to abuses»kunna reagera vid allvarliga hot mot befolkningsgrupper, även när hotet kommer från dem« (party programme ↗)“be able to respond to serious threats against population groups, even when the threat comes from them”
- multilateral impact»Vi är övertygade om att EU-samarbetet är grunden för att lösa många av vår tids svåraste problem.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We are convinced that EU cooperation is the foundation for solving many of the most difficult problems of our time.”
- international law and the UN»Vi kommer att fortsätta värna FN:s roll i arbetet för folkrätten och det internationella samarbetet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We will continue to uphold the UN's role in work for international law and international cooperation.”
The plan places international law and human rights at the center and describes Russia's invasion of Ukraine as a serious violation of Europe's security.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan places international law and human rights at the center and describes Russia's invasion of Ukraine as a serious violation of Europe's security. Maintaining sanctions against Russian decision-makers and using frozen assets for Ukraine's reconstruction follows from that line about accountability. The plan's requirement that counter-terrorism must not happen at the expense of human rights, however, qualifies the listing of private military companies.
Original (Swedish)
Planen sätter folkrätten och de mänskliga rättigheterna i centrum och beskriver den ryska invasionen av Ukraina som ett allvarligt brott mot säkerheten i Europa. Att upprätthålla sanktionerna mot ryska beslutsfattare och använda frysta tillgångar för Ukrainas återuppbyggnad följer av den linjen om ansvarsutkrävande. Planens krav på att terrorbekämpning inte får ske på bekostnad av mänskliga rättigheter kvalificerar däremot listningen av privata militära företag.
- international law at the centerdecisive»Miljöpartiet de gröna sätter folkrätten och de mänskliga rättigheterna i centrum.« (party programme ↗)“The Greens place international law and human rights at the center.”
- response to Russia's invasion»Det allvarliga säkerhetsläget i Europa efter Rysslands invasion av Ukraina och effekterna av klimatförändringarna gör det ännu viktigare med nära samarbeten med andra länder.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The serious security situation in Europe after Russia's invasion of Ukraine and the effects of climate change make close cooperation with other countries even more important.”
- multilateral anchoring»ett starkt internationellt samarbete med FN som central aktör för fred och mänskliga rättigheter« (party programme ↗)“strong international cooperation with the UN as a central actor for peace and human rights”
- limit on terrorism listing»Brotts- och terrorbekämpning är viktigt men ska inte ske på bekostnad av mänskliga rättigheter.« (party programme ↗)“Crime and counter-terrorism is important but shall not happen at the expense of human rights.”
The plan's sharpest commitment on Russia is to cut off Putin's war chest and stop energy trade, which includes maintaining sanctions against decision-makers and oligarchs and using frozen assets for Ukraine.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's sharpest commitment on Russia is to cut off Putin's war chest and stop energy trade, which includes maintaining sanctions against decision-makers and oligarchs and using frozen assets for Ukraine. The plan describes Russia's war of aggression as a threat to all of Europe's security in violation of international law, which justifies listing Russian private military companies with state ties. Foreign policy's purpose to protect universal human rights and freedoms points in the same direction.
Original (Swedish)
Planens skarpaste åtagande om Ryssland är att strypa Putins krigskassa och stoppa energihandeln, vilket bär både upprätthållna sanktioner mot beslutsfattare och oligarker och att frysta tillgångar används för Ukraina. Planen beskriver Rysslands anfallskrig som ett folkrättsvidrigt hot mot hela Europas säkerhet, vilket motiverar att ryska privata militärföretag med statskoppling listas. Utrikespolitikens syfte att värna mänskliga fri- och rättigheter pekar åt samma håll.
- cut off Russia's war financingdecisive»Stryp Putins krigskassa nu. Vi vill stoppa all energihandel med Ryssland och fasa ut fossila bränslen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Cut off Putin's war chest now. We want to stop all energy trade with Russia and phase out fossil fuels.”
- support for Ukraine»Ibland förs kampen med vapen, som i fallet med Rysslands anfallskrig, som hotar Ukrainas överlevnad och hela Europas säkerhet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sometimes the struggle is conducted with weapons, as in the case of Russia's war of aggression, which threatens Ukraine's survival and all of Europe's security.”
- Russia's illegal attack under international law»Vissa hot kommer utifrån, som Rysslands folkrättsvidriga krig mot Ukraina har visat.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Some threats come from outside, as Russia's war against Ukraine in violation of international law has shown.”
- human-rights-driven foreign policy»Utrikes- och säkerhetspolitiken syftar ytterst till att värna universella mänskliga fri- och rättigheter.« (party programme ↗)“Foreign and security policy ultimately aims to protect universal human rights and freedoms.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto establishes that Sweden must be driving for as comprehensive a sanctions regime against Russia as possible and guarantee that Ukraine receives increased economic, political and military support.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto establishes that Sweden must be driving for as comprehensive a sanctions regime against Russia as possible and guarantee that Ukraine receives increased economic, political and military support. This is exactly what the counter-proposal demands through maintained sanctions against decision-makers and oligarchs, use of frozen assets for reconstruction and listing of Russian military companies. The plan furthermore demands complete Russian military withdrawal.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet slår fast att Sverige ska vara pådrivande för en så heltäckande sanktionsregim mot Ryssland som möjligt och garantera att Ukraina får ökat ekonomiskt, politiskt och militärt stöd. Det är exakt vad motförslaget kräver genom vidmakthållna sanktioner mot beslutsfattare och oligarker, användning av frysta tillgångar för återuppbyggnaden och listning av ryska militärföretag. Planen kräver dessutom fullständig rysk militär reträtt.
- comprehensive sanctions regimedecisive»Sverige ska vara pådrivande för att så breda globala koalitioner som möjligt bygger ut en så heltäckande sanktionsregim mot Ryssland som möjligt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden must be driving for as broad global coalitions as possible to build as comprehensive a sanctions regime against Russia as possible.”
- increased support to Ukraine»En ny regering ska vara garanten för att Ukraina ges ökat ekonomiskt, politiskt och militärt stöd.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“A new government must be the guarantor that Ukraine is given increased economic, political and military support.”
- complete Russian withdrawal»Sverige ska helhjärtat stödja Ukraina i att Rysslands oprovocerade anfallskrig måste sluta i fullständig rysk militär reträtt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden must wholeheartedly support Ukraine in that Russia's unprovoked war of aggression must end in complete Russian military withdrawal.”
- acute threat to the security order»Med det ryska anfallskriget mot Ukraina – detta angrepp mot hela Europa – är hotet mot vår säkerhetsordning akut.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“With Russia's war of aggression against Ukraine – this attack on all of Europe – the threat to our security order is acute.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan stipulates that aggression can never be rewarded and that no one has the right, in an attitude of passive neutrality, to abandon people subjected to warfare.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan stipulates that aggression can never be rewarded and that no one has the right, in an attitude of passive neutrality, to abandon people subjected to warfare. It requires that the UN's position and international courts be strengthened, which supports the requirement for accountability for serious violations. Sanctions are according to the plan a means that can be resorted to when positive means are insufficient, and Sweden cannot remain neutral if neighbouring countries are attacked.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att aggression aldrig får löna sig och att ingen får överge människor som utsätts för krigshandlingar i passiv neutralitet. Den kräver att FN:s ställning och de internationella domstolarna stärks, vilket bär kravet på ansvarsutkrävande för grova övergrepp. Sanktioner är enligt planen ett medel som kan tillgripas när positiva verkningsmedel inte räcker, och Sverige kan inte stå neutralt om grannländer anfalls.
- aggression can never be rewardeddecisive»Aggression får aldrig löna sig och ingen har rätt, i en attityd av passiv neutralitet, att överge människor som utsätts för krigshandlingar.« (party programme ↗)“Aggression can never be rewarded and no one has the right, in an attitude of passive neutrality, to abandon people subjected to warfare.”
- accountability in international courts»Därför måste FN:s ställning skyddas och stärkas, liksom olika internationella domstolar och rättssystem inom FN-systemet.« (party programme ↗)“Therefore, the UN's position must be protected and strengthened, as well as various international courts and legal systems within the UN system.”
- sanctions as a last resort»Som en sista utväg kan bojkott och sanktioner bli aktuella.« (party programme ↗)“As a last resort, boycotts and sanctions may become relevant.”
- solidarity with attacked neighbours»Vi kan inte stå neutrala om våra grannländer anfalls.« (party programme ↗)“We cannot remain neutral if our neighbouring countries are attacked.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan states that Russia's invasion has created the most serious security policy crisis in Europe since the Second World War and that Sweden shall wholeheartedly stand up for Ukraine.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan states that Russia's invasion has created the most serious security policy crisis in Europe since the Second World War and that Sweden shall wholeheartedly stand up for Ukraine. Maintaining sanctions against Russian decision-makers, using frozen assets for reconstruction and terror-listing Russian private military companies follows from that position. The plan does not mention the individual measures, so the support is derived.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att Rysslands invasion skapat den allvarligaste säkerhetspolitiska krisen i Europa sedan andra världskriget och att Sverige helhjärtat ska stå upp för Ukraina. Att upprätthålla sanktionerna mot ryska beslutsfattare, använda frysta tillgångar för återuppbyggnaden och terrorlista ryska privata militärföretag följer av den hållningen. Planen nämner inte de enskilda åtgärderna, varför stödet är härlett.
- full support for Ukrainedecisive»Sverige ska helhjärtat stå upp för Ukraina, även med fortsatta vapenleveranser.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden shall wholeheartedly stand up for Ukraine, including with continued weapons supplies.”
- Russian aggression as main threat»Rysslands invasion av Ukraina har skapat den allvarligaste säkerhetspolitiska krisen i Europa sedan andra världskriget.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Russia's invasion of Ukraine has created the most serious security policy crisis in Europe since the Second World War.”
- resistance to authoritarian states»Stora auktoritära länder ska inte kunna spela ut enskilda små västerländska demokratier mot varandra.« (party programme ↗)“Large authoritarian countries shall not be able to play off individual small Western democracies against each other.”
- multilateral action»EU är tillsammans med Nato vårt allra viktigaste internationella samarbete.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“EU, together with NATO, is our most important international cooperation.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan states that Sweden should work for clear sanctions against Russia and other countries with negative development, and that Sweden clearly shall mark against violations of sovereign states' territory.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan states that Sweden should work for clear sanctions against Russia and other countries with negative development, and that Sweden clearly shall mark against violations of sovereign states' territory. Upholding sanctions against Russian decision-makers, using frozen assets for Ukraine's reconstruction and terror-listing Russian private military companies lie directly in that line and in the plan's fight against international terrorism.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att Sverige bör verka för tydliga sanktioner mot Ryssland och andra länder med en negativ utveckling, och att Sverige tydligt ska markera mot kränkningar av suveräna staters territorium. Att upprätthålla sanktionerna mot ryska beslutsfattare, använda frysta tillgångar för Ukrainas återuppbyggnad och terrorlista ryska privata militära företag ligger direkt i den linjen och i planens kamp mot internationell terrorism.
- sanctions against Russiadecisive»Sverige bör verka för tydliga sanktioner mot Turkiet, Belarus, Ryssland och andra länder med en negativ utveckling.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden should work for clear sanctions against Turkey, Belarus, Russia and other countries with negative development.”
- marking against aggression»Sverige ska tydligt markera mot kränkningar av grundläggande fri- och rättigheter och av suveräna staters territorium.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden shall clearly mark against violations of fundamental freedoms and rights and of sovereign states' territory.”
- combated terrorism»Bekämpa internationell terrorism och islamism« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Combat international terrorism and Islamism”
- Swedish security interests»Värna svenska intressen i internationella sammanhang« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Protect Swedish interests in international contexts”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2023/24:UU10)
- Committee report full text (HB01UU10)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2023/24:1668 — Skärpta sanktioner mot Ryssland av Anders Ygeman (S)
- Motion 2023/24:190 — Utredning om Elon Musks roll i Ukrainakriget av Magnus Jacobsson (KD)
- Motion 2023/24:191 — Ökat stöd till Ukraina av Magnus Jacobsson (KD)
- Motion 2023/24:197 — Balkankonferens avseende handel och försoning av Magnus Jacobsson (KD)
- Motion 2023/24:2343 — En svensk utvecklingspolitik för rättvisa, jämställdhet och hållbar utveckling av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2023/24:2466 — Utrikes- och biståndspolitik av Kerstin Lundgren m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2023/24:2562 — Internationell samverkan av Morgan Johansson m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2023/24:2564 — Försvar och samhällets krisberedskap av Peter Hultqvist m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2023/24:2605 — Belarus av Martin Ådahl (C)
- Motion 2023/24:2836 — med anledning av skr. 2023/24:115 Verksamheten i Europeiska unionen under 2023 av Håkan Svenneling m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2023/24:292 — Europeisk federation av Joar Forssell (L)
- Motion 2023/24:462 — Nordafrika och Mellanöstern av Håkan Svenneling m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2023/24:476 — Internationella relationer och mänskliga rättigheter av Markus Wiechel m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:481 — Sverigedemokraternas biståndspolitik av Yasmine Eriksson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:482 — Säkerhetspolitik av Aron Emilsson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:486 — Vissa Latinamerikafrågor av Markus Wiechel m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:729 — Skärpning av EU:s sanktioner mot regimen i Belarus av Mikael Oscarsson (KD)
- Motion 2023/24:731 — Flytt av Sveriges ambassad till Jerusalem av Mikael Oscarsson (KD)
- Motion 2023/24:732 — Förföljelse av kristna av Mikael Oscarsson (KD)
- Motion 2023/24:964 — Sveriges globala röst av Per Bolund m.fl. (MP)
Source: The Swedish Parliament