2024-05-162023/24:UbU11 · p.8UbUEducation
Background checks
Tighter background checks for school staff and school transport
What's at stake: The issue concerns children's safety at school and during school transport, and how thoroughly and how often those hired or contracted are checked for a criminal background.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
Whether background-check legislation for school staff should be tightened now - with more offence categories, annual checks and extension to school-transport drivers - or whether the ongoing government review and consultation on the issue should be awaited.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee underlines that a safe and secure school environment is fundamental and that background-check legislation to protect children from abuse is very important. An investigator has already been tasked with reviewing whether background checks for school employment can be expanded, and a memorandum proposing further offence categories has been circulated for consultation. The committee does not want to pre-empt this work and recommends rejecting the motions.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 16 (SD)
The reserving party (SD) calls for the background-check extract to be submitted to the principal and archived, for it to be expanded to cover more offence categories - including assault, unlawful deprivation of liberty, robbery, theft, weapons offences, alcohol and drug offences, and terrorist offences - for the background-check requirement to extend to school-transport drivers, and for a new extract to be required every year.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 16 by SD.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | Yes | Yes 19/0/0/5 | follows the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| S | No | Yes 93/0/0/13 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| MP | Yes | Yes 13/0/0/5 | follows the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| C | No | Abstain 0/0/19/5 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| L | Yes | Yes 12/0/0/4 | follows the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| KD | No | Yes 14/0/0/5 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| M | No | Yes 60/0/0/8 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| SD | No | No 0/61/0/11 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2023/24:370 by Patrick Reslow et al. (SD) item 3, 2023/24:2484 by Ulrika Liljeberg et al. (C) item 28 and 2023/24:2489 by Niels Paarup-Petersen et al. (C) item 7.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2023/24:370 av Patrick Reslow m.fl. (SD) yrkande 3, 2023/24:2484 av Ulrika Liljeberg m.fl. (C) yrkande 28 och 2023/24:2489 av Niels Paarup-Petersen m.fl. (C) yrkande 7.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag rejected approximately 120 proposals on teachers and students in motions from the general motion period 2023. The reason is, among other things, that work is underway or that measures have already been taken on the issues covered by the proposals. The proposals dealt, for example, with school staff, background checks (registerkontroll), student health and students with special needs.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to reintroduce the teaching obligation and make workplace-arranged working time more flexible to make the teaching profession more attractive. (SD) — Reservation 16
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan affirms that all people have the right to protection of their personal privacy and that the presumption of innocence is fundamental in the justice system, and it is critical of governance built on bureaucratic surveillance.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan affirms that all people have the right to protection of their personal privacy and that the presumption of innocence is fundamental in the justice system, and it is critical of governance built on bureaucratic surveillance. A greatly expanded register check with annual statements and broad crime categories such as property and alcohol offences goes further than what protection against abuse justifies. The best interests of the child speak simultaneously for control, which makes the conclusion uncertain.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att alla människor har rätt till skydd av sin personliga integritet och att oskuldspresumtionen är grundläggande i rättsväsendet, och den är kritisk till styrning som bygger på byråkratisk övervakning. En kraftigt utvidgad registerkontroll med årliga utdrag och breda brottskategorier som egendoms- och alkoholbrott går längre än skyddet mot övergrepp motiverar. Barnets bästa talar samtidigt för kontroll, vilket gör slutsatsen osäker.
- protection of personal privacydecisive»har rätt till skydd av sin personliga integritet.« (party programme ↗)“has the right to protection of their personal privacy.”
- presumption of innocence»anses oskyldiga tills motsatsen är bevisad är grundläggande i det.« (party programme ↗)“are presumed innocent until the contrary is proven is fundamental in the.”
- against bureaucratic surveillance»kontrollsystem och byråkratisk övervakning förstör människors« (party programme ↗)“control systems and bureaucratic surveillance destroy people's”
- the best interests of the child»barnkonventionen och principen att i varje läge se till barnets« (party programme ↗)“the child convention and the principle that in every case regard the”
The party programme grants all children the right to a safe upbringing free from violence and to secure learning environments, and the election manifesto demands measures against sexual crimes and the removal of barriers between authorities so that child protection functions.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme grants all children the right to a safe upbringing free from violence and to secure learning environments, and the election manifesto demands measures against sexual crimes and the removal of barriers between authorities so that child protection functions. Extended crime categories in background checks, requirements for school bus drivers and annual oversight are means for this same protection. However, the plan does not specify the scope of such oversight.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet ger alla barn rätt till en trygg uppväxt fri från våld och till trygga studiemiljöer, och valmanifestet kräver krafttag mot sexualbrott och att hinder mellan myndigheter rivs så att skyddet av barn fungerar. Utökade brottskategorier i registerkontrollen, krav på skolskjutsförare och årlig kontroll är medel för samma skydd. Planen preciserar dock inte kontrollens omfattning.
- safe upbringing free from violencedecisive»Alla barn och ungdomar ska ha rätt till likvärdiga villkor« (party programme ↗)“All children and young people shall have the right to equivalent conditions”
- protection against sexual crimes»Krafttag för att stoppa hedersrelaterat våld, sexualbrott och mäns våld mot kvinnor.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Measures to stop honour-related violence, sexual crimes and male violence against women.”
- information must reach those who need it»Sekretesshinder mellan myndigheter ska rivas så att polisen och andra yrkesgrupper kan göra sitt jobb.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Secrecy barriers between authorities shall be removed so that the police and other professional groups can do their job.”
- secure school environment»Studerande, barn lika väl som vuxna, ska ha rätt till trygga arbetsmiljöer och« (party programme ↗)“Students, both children and adults, shall have the right to safe work environments and”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan wants to strengthen children's legal security in cases of suspected abuse, but at the same time establishes that the party opposes laws with disproportionate interference with privacy and that no unlawful registration should occur.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to strengthen children's legal security in cases of suspected abuse, but at the same time establishes that the party opposes laws with disproportionate interference with privacy and that no unlawful registration should occur. Substantially widening the monitored crime categories to include property crimes, alcohol and drug offences and requiring new extracts every year goes further than child protection justifies. The conclusion is based on a balancing of the plan's two commitments and is uncertain.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill stärka barns rättstrygghet vid misstankar om övergrepp, men slår samtidigt fast att partiet motsätter sig lagar med oproportionerliga ingrepp i integriteten och att ingen otillbörlig registrering får förekomma. Att kraftigt vidga de kontrollerade brottskategorierna till bland annat egendoms-, alkohol- och narkotikabrott och kräva nytt utdrag varje år går längre än vad skyddet av barn motiverar. Slutsatsen bygger på en avvägning mellan planens två åtaganden och är osäker.
- proportionality in privacy intrusionsdecisive»Vi motsätter oss alla lagar som innebär oproportionerliga ingrepp i integriteten.« (party programme ↗)“We oppose all laws that involve disproportionate interference with privacy.”
- against unlawful registration»Ingen otillbörlig registrering eller övervakning baserad på politiska åsikter eller demokratisk verksamhet får förekomma.« (party programme ↗)“No unlawful registration or surveillance based on political opinions or democratic activity should occur.”
- child protection»Barnets rättstrygghet måste stärkas om det finns misstankar om våld eller sexuella övergrepp.« (party programme ↗)“Children's legal security must be strengthened if there are suspicions of violence or sexual abuse.”
- safe childhood»En trygg barndom med goda möjligheter till lek ska vara en rättighet för alla.« (party programme ↗)“A safe childhood with good opportunities for play should be a right for everyone.”
The plan requires that school be a safe place where children can grow and that every child has unconditional protection against violence and degradation.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that school be a safe place where children can grow and that every child has unconditional protection against violence and degradation. Extended background checks, including school transport drivers, are a means for that protection. At the same time, the plan requires that all legislation be tested against its impact on personal privacy, which makes the demands for annual extracts and significantly expanded crime categories questionable and the conclusion uncertain.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att skolan ska vara en trygg plats där barn kan växa och att varje barn har ett villkorslöst skydd mot våld och förnedring. En utvidgad registerkontroll, inklusive skolskjutsförare, är ett medel för det skyddet. Samtidigt kräver planen att varje lagstiftning prövas mot sin påverkan på den personliga integriteten, vilket gör kraven på årliga utdrag och kraftigt utvidgade brottskategorier tveksamma och slutsatsen osäker.
- safe school environmentdecisive»Skolan ska vara en trygg plats — fri från rasism, homofobi och trakasserier grundade på kön — där barn kan växa och utvecklas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“School should be a safe place — free from racism, homophobia and harassment based on gender — where children can grow and develop.”
- unconditional child protection»villkorslöst skydd mot våld och förnedring inom och utom hemmet,« (party programme ↗)“unconditional protection against violence and degradation at home and away from home,”
- children's rights first»Av största betydelse är då barnens rättigheter och perspektiv.« (party programme ↗)“Of utmost importance are then the rights and perspectives of children.”
- privacy testing of legislationweak support»All lagstiftning bör prövas mot dess påverkan på människors personliga integritet.« (party programme ↗)“All legislation should be tested against its impact on people's personal privacy.”
flags: citat_svagt
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan establishes that measures that negatively affect personal privacy are justified only if an opposing interest weighs significantly heavier and the measure is effective, and that registration must not be used for purposes other than the original ones.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that measures that negatively affect personal privacy are justified only if an opposing interest weighs significantly heavier and the measure is effective, and that registration must not be used for purposes other than the original ones. A greatly expanded criminal record check that includes property, alcohol and drug offenses and is required annually goes further than that assessment supports. The plan's responsibility for a safe school environment, however, supports checks aimed at crimes against children.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att åtgärder som negativt påverkar den personliga integriteten bara är berättigade om ett motstående intresse väger uppenbart tyngre och åtgärden är effektiv, och att registrering inte ska användas för andra syften än de ursprungliga. En kraftigt utvidgad registerkontroll som omfattar bland annat egendoms-, alkohol- och narkotikabrott och krävs årligen går längre än den prövningen bär. Planens ansvar för en trygg skolmiljö stöder däremot kontroll riktad mot brott mot barn.
- proportionality in privacy intrusionsdecisive»Åtgärder som påverkar den personliga integriteten negativt är endast berättigade om ett motstående intresse väger uppenbart tyngre och åtgärden är effektiv.« (party programme ↗)“Measures that negatively affect personal privacy are justified only if an opposing interest weighs significantly heavier and the measure is effective.”
- purpose-limited recording»Övervakning och registrering ska inte användas för andra syften än vad som var de ursprungliga motiven eller vad som var känt för den individ som lämnade uppgifterna.« (party programme ↗)“Monitoring and recording must not be used for purposes other than what the original motives were or what was known to the individual who provided the data.”
- privacy review of legislative proposals»Alla nya lagförslag ska analyseras ur integritetssynpunkt.« (party programme ↗)“All new legislative proposals must be analyzed from a privacy perspective.”
- school's protective responsibility»Skolan måste arbeta målmedvetet med att förebygga och förhindra kränkande behandling.« (party programme ↗)“Schools must work deliberately to prevent and stop degrading treatment.”
The plan's protection of children against abuse is uncompromising; the election manifesto wishes to significantly increase penalties for sexual crimes against children and the programme stipulates children's right to a safe living environment and a school environment characterized by security and good order.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's protection of children against abuse is uncompromising; the election manifesto wishes to significantly increase penalties for sexual crimes against children and the programme stipulates children's right to a safe living environment and a school environment characterized by security and good order. Extended and recurring register checks are a means for this. That a person who has served their sentence according to the plan deserves to be treated like any other citizen, however, argues against a very broad expansion of crime categories.
Original (Swedish)
Planens skydd av barn mot övergrepp är kompromisslöst; valmanifestet vill skärpa straffen för sexualbrott mot barn kraftigt och programmet slår fast barns rätt till en trygg uppväxtmiljö och en skolmiljö präglad av trygghet och god ordning. Utvidgad och återkommande registerkontroll är ett medel för det. Att den som avtjänat sitt straff enligt planen förtjänar att behandlas som vilken medborgare som helst talar dock mot en mycket bred utvidgning av brottskategorierna.
- strong protection against sexual crimes against childrendecisive»Skärp straffen för sexualbrott kraftigt. 25 års fängelse för grov våldtäkt, kemisk kastrering som villkor för villkorlig frigivning och livstids fängelse för grov våldtäkt mot barn.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Significantly increase penalties for sexual crimes. 25 years' imprisonment for aggravated rape, chemical castration as a condition for conditional release and life imprisonment for aggravated rape against children.”
- children's right to safe upbringing»Barn har rätt till en trygg uppväxtmiljö.« (party programme ↗)“Children have the right to a safe living environment.”
- safe school environment»Det är viktigt att skolans arbetsmiljö genomsyras av trygghet, arbetsro och god ordning.« (party programme ↗)“It is important that the school's working environment is characterized by security, order and good conduct.”
- served sentence shall be atoned»Genom att avtjäna ett rättvist straff sonar å andra sidan brottslingen sin skuld, och förtjänar därefter att behandlas som vilken annan medborgare som helst.« (party programme ↗)“By serving a just sentence, the offender atones for the crime, and thereafter deserves to be treated like any other citizen.”
flags: citat_migrerat
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan is built on schools being a safe place and states that nearly half of students have been subjected to crime; it wants to introduce violence against school staff as a new criminal offence category and give the Schools Inspectorate sharp supervisory mandates.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan is built on schools being a safe place and states that nearly half of students have been subjected to crime; it wants to introduce violence against school staff as a new criminal offence category and give the Schools Inspectorate sharp supervisory mandates. An expanded background check with more criminal categories and requirements for school transport drivers also serves the same protective purpose. The requirement for a new certificate each year, however, goes against the plan's desire to reduce administration.
Original (Swedish)
Planen bygger på att skolan ska vara en trygg plats och konstaterar att nästan hälften av eleverna utsatts för brott; den vill införa våld mot skolpersonal som ny brottsrubricering och ge Skolinspektionen skarpa granskningsuppdrag. En utvidgad registerkontroll med fler brottskategorier och krav även på skolskjutsförare tjänar samma skyddssyfte. Kravet på nytt utdrag varje år går dock emot planens vilja att minska administrationen.
- safety for school staffdecisive»Införa våld mot skolpersonal som ny brottsrubricering« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Introduce violence against school staff as a new criminal offence category”
- crime in school environment»Dessutom har nästan hälften av eleverna blivit utsatta för ett brott.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Furthermore, nearly half of students have been subjected to a crime.”
- strict school supervision»Ge Skolinspektionen i särskilt uppdrag att granska och stänga skolor som kan misstänkas främja radikalisering och segregation« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Give the Schools Inspectorate a special mandate to inspect and close schools that can be suspected of promoting radicalisation and segregation”
- safety as a condition for freedom»Frihet och trygghet går hand i hand.« (party programme ↗)“Freedom and safety go hand in hand.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan states that school shall be made a safe place for pupils and staff and demands zero tolerance against violence and insecurity in school, whilst the child's best interest shall always be considered.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan states that school shall be made a safe place for pupils and staff and demands zero tolerance against violence and insecurity in school, whilst the child's best interest shall always be considered. An expanded criminal record check with more crime categories, requirements covering school transport providers and annual renewal is a direct measure for that safety.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att skolan ska göras till en trygg plats för elever och personal och kräver nolltolerans mot våld och otrygghet i skolan, samtidigt som barnets bästa alltid ska beaktas. En utökad registerkontroll med fler brottskategorier, krav som omfattar skolskjutsförare och årlig förnyelse är en direkt åtgärd för den tryggheten.
- safe school environmentdecisive»Skolan ska göras till en trygg plats för elever och personal, som skapar normer för sammanhållning mellan människor och som fokuserar på kunskap och bildning.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“School shall be made a safe place for pupils and staff, which creates norms for cohesion between people and which focuses on knowledge and education.”
- zero tolerance in school»Förbättra arbetsmiljön genom att införa nolltolerans mot våld och otrygghet i skolan« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Improve working environment by introducing zero tolerance against violence and insecurity in school”
- child's best interest»Att barnets bästa alltid ska beaktas« (2022 manifesto ↗)“That the child's best interest shall always be considered”
- crime shall have consequences»Införa nolltolerans mot brott så att även mindre allvarliga brott utreds och lagförs« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Introduce zero tolerance against crime so that even minor serious crimes are investigated and prosecuted”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2023/24:UbU11)
- Committee report full text (HB01UbU11)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2023/24:1028 — Åtgärder för att motverka problematisk skolfrånvaro av Louise Thunström (S)
- Motion 2023/24:1036 — Nollvision mot mobbning av Anna Wallentheim (S)
- Motion 2023/24:1048 — Adhd-diagnoser hos barn och unga av Lili André (KD)
- Motion 2023/24:1236 — Införande av rätten till punktskrift i skollagen av Christofer Bergenblock (C)
- Motion 2023/24:124 — Obligatoriska besök hos elevhälsan för alla elever på högstadiet och gymnasiet av Martin Westmont (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:1298 — Tidiga insatser för att säkra barns skolgång av Hanna Westerén (S)
- Motion 2023/24:1346 — Utökad satsning på läsinlärning genom stärkt lärarkompetens av Lars Isacsson (S)
- Motion 2023/24:1404 — Ett regelverk som möjliggör bruk av skoluniformer av Stefan Olsson (M)
- Motion 2023/24:1415 — Sammanhållen skolhälsovård av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2023/24:1418 — Särskild prövning till anpassad skola av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2023/24:1476 — Hälsosam och kvalitetssäkrad skolmat av Markus Wiechel och Alexander Christiansson (båda SD)
- Motion 2023/24:1484 — Avgiftsfria mensskydd i grundskolan och gymnasieskolan av Sofia Skönnbrink (S)
- Motion 2023/24:1515 — Modersmålsundervisning för döva och hörselskadade elever i grundskolan av Jessica Rodén (S)
- Motion 2023/24:1562 — Ett nationellt lyft fo¨r en organiserad rastverksamhet av Mattias Vepsä (S)
- Motion 2023/24:1670 — Avgiftsfria mensskydd i grund- och gymnasieskolor av Alexandra Völker och Azadeh Rojhan (båda S)
- Motion 2023/24:1679 — SPSM och tillgänglighet för studerande av Ewa Pihl Krabbe och Per-Arne Håkansson (båda S)
- Motion 2023/24:1718 — Nationellt frånvaroregister i skolan av Aida Birinxhiku (S)
- Motion 2023/24:1744 — Ett rikt friluftsliv i skolan av Anne-Li Sjölund (C)
- Motion 2023/24:180 — Rekrytering av rektorer av Markus Wiechel (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:1875 — Ett rörelserikt samhälle - åtgärder för att främja fysisk aktivitet av Amanda Lind m.fl. (MP)
Source: The Swedish Parliament