2026-04-012025/26:KU29 · p.7KUConstitution
Digitalization
Mandatory digital official mail in public administration
What's at stake: The decision affects how quickly citizens and agencies can shift to digital mail instead of paper mail, which according to an agency assessment could yield savings of up to SEK 140 billion for the public sector while also improving service to citizens.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether agencies, municipalities and regions should be placed under an obligation to send official mail to individuals digitally, or whether it is enough for the matter to continue being prepared within the government's digitalization strategy.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee notes the government's digitalization strategy for 2025-2030, which aims among other things at increased digital competence with a focus on AI and at a public administration that simplifies and reduces administration through digital services. The committee also notes that a report on digital official mail is being prepared within the Government Offices, and against that background considers that parliament need not take its own initiative. The motions are rejected.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 4 (S)
The reservation (S) argues that the proposal requiring government agencies, municipalities and regions to send official mail to individuals via digital mailboxes should be implemented, pointing out that increased use of digital mail can yield major savings while also improving service to citizens, and that an agency assessment points to a savings potential of up to SEK 140 billion if the public sector increases its digitalization.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 4 by S.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have gone the other way
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: SDSverigedemokraterna
Ja 177–93Nej 118–152
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | Yes | Yes 17/0/0/5 | match | confidence: low | not addressed |
| S | No | No 0/90/0/16 | match | confidence: low | not addressed |
| MP | No | Yes 15/0/0/3 | differs | confidence: low | not addressed |
| C | No | Abstain 0/0/19/5 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| L | No | Yes 12/0/0/4 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| KD | No | Yes 16/0/0/3 | differs | confidence: low | not addressed |
| M | No | Yes 55/0/0/11 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| SD | No | Yes 59/0/0/11 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: medium | explicit |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2025/26:2060 by Anders Ådahl (C) demand 1, 2025/26:2832 by Niels Paarup-Petersen et al. (C) demand 9 and 2025/26:3652 by Aylin Nouri et al. (S) demand 5.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2025/26:2060 av Anders Ådahl (C) yrkande 1, 2025/26:2832 av Niels Paarup-Petersen m.fl. (C) yrkande 9 och 2025/26:3652 av Aylin Nouri m.fl. (S) yrkande 5.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag rejected 53 proposals in motions on public administration from the general motion period of 2025. The proposals concern, among other things, corruption, delegation of administrative tasks, local state services, the Justitiekanslern (Parliamentary Ombudsman), county administrations (länsstyrelser), agency activism and opinion-forming activities. The Riksdag refers, among other things, to measures already taken and ongoing work.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to maintain and expand the presence of state service offices across the country. (S) — Reservation 4
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan does not address digital government mail.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan does not address digital government mail. The closest lying principle is that welfare and societal service must exist everywhere and that it is resources, not new administrative systems, that are needed, and that digital platforms must be built on users' freedom and integrity. A savings-driven demand that the public must send mail digitally thus does not follow from the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planen behandlar inte digital myndighetspost. Den närmast liggande principen är att välfärd och samhällsservice ska finnas överallt och att det är resurser, inte nya administrativa system, som behövs, samt att digitala plattformar ska bygga på användarnas frihet och integritet. Ett besparingsdrivet krav på att det offentliga ska skicka post digitalt följer därför inte av planen.
- resources before administrative systemsdecisive»Det är resurser som främst behövs, inte formulär för kvalitetssäkring, nya bokningssystem för sjukhussängar eller ännu en managementkonsult som inte kan något om verksamheten.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It is resources that are mainly needed, not forms for quality assurance, new booking systems for hospital beds or yet another management consultant who knows nothing about the activity.”
- service for all»Välfärden måste vara till för alla och finnas överallt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Welfare must be for everyone and exist everywhere.”
- users' integrity»på användarnas frihet, integritet och självbestämmande« (party programme ↗)“on users' freedom, integrity and self-determination”
The plan does not address digital authority mail, but it requires that shared resources go to activity and not to bureaucracy, and that service to citizens be good throughout the country.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan does not address digital authority mail, but it requires that shared resources go to activity and not to bureaucracy, and that service to citizens be good throughout the country. An obligation to send mail digitally to those who have a digital mailbox aligns with that commitment. The plan's protection of personal integrity speaks for regulation but not against the proposal in substance.
Original (Swedish)
Planen tar inte upp digital myndighetspost, men den kräver att gemensamma resurser går till verksamheten och inte till byråkrati, och att servicen till medborgarna är god i hela landet. En skyldighet att skicka post digitalt till den som har digital brevlåda ligger i linje med det åtagandet. Planens värn om den personliga integriteten talar för reglering men inte mot förslaget i sak.
- resources to activity, not bureaucracydecisive»Villkor ska ställas så att pengarna till välfärden verkligen går till dess medarbetare – inte mer byråkrati.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Conditions shall be set so that money for welfare really goes to its staff – not more bureaucracy.”
- public services throughout the country»God tillgång till samhällets service i hela landet.« (party programme ↗)“Good access to public services throughout the country.”
- protection of personal integrity»Skydd för den personliga integriteten.« (party programme ↗)“Protection of personal integrity.”
The plan sees digitalization and automation as a way to reduce work burden and free up time in operations, which supports the counter-proposal's requirement for digital government mail.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan sees digitalization and automation as a way to reduce work burden and free up time in operations, which supports the counter-proposal's requirement for digital government mail. The plan at the same time conditions technology leaps with development reaching everyone and groups less involved in digitalization not being left behind. Since the requirement applies only to individuals who already have a digital mailbox, that objection carries little weight. The question is not explicitly addressed, so the position is derived.
Original (Swedish)
Planen ser digitalisering och automatisering som ett sätt att minska arbetsbelastningen och frigöra tid i verksamheter, vilket talar för motförslagets krav på digital myndighetspost. Planen villkorar samtidigt tekniksprång med att utvecklingen ska komma alla till del och att grupper som är mindre delaktiga i digitaliseringen inte lämnas efter. Eftersom kravet endast gäller enskilda som redan har digital brevlåda väger den invändningen lätt. Frågan behandlas inte uttryckligen, så ställningstagandet är härlett.
- digitalization frees up resourcesdecisive»minska arbetsbelastningen och frigöra tid inom många yrken.« (party programme ↗)“reduce work burden and free up time in many professions.”
- no one left behind digitally»Den tekniska utvecklingen ska komma alla till del och ingen ska lämnas efter.« (party programme ↗)“Technical development should reach everyone and no one should be left behind.”
- digital participation for all»de grupper som i lägre utsträckning känner sig delaktiga i digitaliseringen« (party programme ↗)“groups who feel less involved in digitalization”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan sees digitalization on equal terms as a prerequisite for democracy and wants to use digital tools to reduce administration, while politics must be economical with taxpayers' money.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan sees digitalization on equal terms as a prerequisite for democracy and wants to use digital tools to reduce administration, while politics must be economical with taxpayers' money. A requirement that the public sector send mail digitally to those with digital mailboxes aligns with that efficiency and service ambition. The plan's decentralization principle does speak against new state obligations for municipalities, but the efficiency gain outweighs that.
Original (Swedish)
Planen ser digitalisering på lika villkor som en förutsättning för demokrati och vill använda digitala verktyg för att minska administrationen, samtidigt som politiken ska hushålla med skattebetalarnas pengar. En skyldighet för det offentliga att skicka post digitalt till den som har digital brevlåda ligger i linje med den effektiviserings- och serviceambitionen. Planens decentraliseringsprincip talar visserligen emot nya statliga skyldigheter för kommunerna, men effektiviseringsvinsten väger tyngre.
- digitalization on equal termsdecisive»Digitalisering på lika villkor, oavsett var man bor, är en förutsättning för demokrati och möjliggör decentralisering.« (party programme ↗)“Digitalization on equal terms, regardless of where one lives, is a prerequisite for democracy and enables decentralization.”
- be economical with tax revenues»Politiken ska hushålla med skattebetalarnas pengar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Politics should be economical with taxpayers' money.”
- digital tools reduce administration»Den administrativa bördan inom vården måste minska, bland annat med hjälp av digitala verktyg som är användbara och efterfrågade av medarbetarna.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The administrative burden in healthcare must be reduced, among other things with the help of digital tools that are useful and desired by employees.”
- decentralized decision-making»Decentralisera mera. Människor ska få bestämma mer själva, och politiska beslut ska fattas nära dem som berörs.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Decentralize more. People should be able to decide more themselves, and political decisions should be made close to those affected.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan's digitalization principle is that all public functions that at reasonable cost can be made digitally accessible also must be, which underlies the requirement that authorities, municipalities and regions must send mail digitally to those who have a digital mailbox.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's digitalization principle is that all public functions that at reasonable cost can be made digitally accessible also must be, which underlies the requirement that authorities, municipalities and regions must send mail digitally to those who have a digital mailbox. The plan wants society to make use of technology's possibilities and for public resources to be used more efficiently. Data protection must at the same time be strengthened, which is a condition but not an obstacle to digital government mail.
Original (Swedish)
Planens digitaliseringsprincip är att alla offentliga funktioner som till rimlig kostnad kan göras digitalt tillgängliga också ska göras det, vilket bär kravet på att myndigheter, kommuner och regioner ska skicka post digitalt till den som har digital brevlåda. Planen vill att samhället tar vara på teknikens möjligheter och att offentliga resurser används effektivare. Integritetsskyddet ska samtidigt stärkas, vilket är ett villkor men inget hinder mot digital myndighetspost.
- digitally accessible governmentdecisive»som till en rimlig kostnad kan göras digitalt tillgängliga också ska göras digitalt tillgängliga.« (party programme ↗)“that at reasonable cost can be made digitally accessible must also be made digitally accessible.”
- make use of technology»de möjligheter som den tekniska utvecklingen skapar« (party programme ↗)“the opportunities that technological development creates”
- strengthened data protection»Skyddet för den enskildes integritet ska stärkas.« (party programme ↗)“Data protection must be strengthened.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan requires restraint in public spending and sees reliable electronic communications as a prerequisite for development, which argues for an obligation to use digital mail where major savings can be made.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires restraint in public spending and sees reliable electronic communications as a prerequisite for development, which argues for an obligation to use digital mail where major savings can be made. At the same time, the plan calls for great caution in handling personal data and for the financing principle to be respected when the state imposes new tasks on municipalities. Overall, the efficiency and savings commitment outweighs, but the conclusion is derived.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver återhållsamhet i de offentliga utgifterna och ser tillförlitliga elektroniska kommunikationer som en förutsättning för utveckling, vilket talar för en skyldighet att använda digital post där stora besparingar kan göras. Samtidigt manar planen till stor försiktighet vid hantering av personuppgifter och till att finansieringsprincipen respekteras när staten ålägger kommunerna nya uppgifter. Sammantaget väger effektivitets- och besparingsåtagandet över, men slutsatsen är härledd.
- restrained public spendingdecisive»återhållsamhet i de offentliga utgifterna« (party programme ↗)“restraint in public spending”
- expanded digital infrastructure»tillförlitliga elektroniska kommunikationer med hög prestanda« (party programme ↗)“reliable electronic communications with high performance”
- protection of personal integrity»Den personliga integriteten ska ha ett starkt grundlagsskydd« (party programme ↗)“Personal integrity shall have strong constitutional protection”
- financing principle in state requirements»Finansieringsprincipen måste respekteras när staten ålägger« (party programme ↗)“The financing principle must be respected when the state imposes”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan requires the state to streamline administration and cut back administrative work: processing times shall be shortened, one-third of red tape shall be removed and an efficiency office shall review the finances of all government agencies.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires the state to streamline administration and cut back administrative work: processing times shall be shortened, one-third of red tape shall be removed and an efficiency office shall review the finances of all government agencies. A requirement that authorities, municipalities and regions send post digitally, with great savings potential and better service, aligns with these commitments and with the requirement that public waste shall be combated. The plan, however, does not explicitly mention digital mailbox.
Original (Swedish)
Planen ålägger staten att effektivisera förvaltningen och skära bort administration: handläggningstiderna ska kortas, en tredjedel av regelkrånglet tas bort och ett effektiviseringskansli ska gå igenom alla myndigheters ekonomi. Ett krav på att myndigheter, kommuner och regioner ska skicka post digitalt, med stor besparingspotential och bättre service, ligger i linje med dessa åtaganden och med kravet att offentligt slöseri ska bekämpas. Planen nämner dock inte digital brevlåda uttryckligen.
- more efficient government agenciesdecisive»Inrätta ett effektiviseringskansli som ska gå inom alla myndigheters ekonomi för att frigöra resurser till försvaret« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Establish an efficiency office that shall review the finances of all government agencies to free up resources for defence”
- shorter processing times»Korta myndigheternas handläggningstider genom en bortre tidsgräns« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Shorten the authorities' processing times through a maximum time limit”
- reduced administration»Ta bort en tredjedel av företagens administrationskostnader och en tredjedel av regelkrånglet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Remove one-third of companies' administrative costs and one-third of red tape”
- combat public waste»Offentligt slöseri i alla former ska bekämpas.« (party programme ↗)“Public waste in all forms shall be combated.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan explicitly states that everyone shall have access to functioning postal services including the possibility to receive government mail digitally.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan explicitly states that everyone shall have access to functioning postal services including the possibility to receive government mail digitally. The counter-proposal's demands that authorities, municipalities and regions send mail digitally to those who have digital mailbox realises precisely this. The demand is also supported by the plan's commitment to scale back unnecessary public expenditure and keep bureaucracy at a minimum.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår uttryckligen fast att alla ska ha tillgång till fungerande posttjänster inklusive möjligheten att få sin myndighetspost digitalt. Motförslagets krav på att myndigheter, kommuner och regioner ska skicka post digitalt till den som har digital brevlåda förverkligar just detta. Kravet stöds dessutom av planens åtagande att skala bort onödiga offentliga utgifter och hålla byråkratin på ett minimum.
- digital government maildecisive»Sverigedemokraterna vill satsa på utbyggnaden av bredband samt säkerställa att alla har tillgång till telefoni och fungerande posttjänster, inklusive möjligheten att få sin myndighetspost digitalt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden Democrats want to invest in the expansion of broadband and ensure that everyone has access to telephony and functioning postal services, including the possibility to receive government mail digitally.”
- reduced public waste»Skala bort onödiga utgifter i det offentliga« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Scale back unnecessary public expenditure”
- streamlined public administration»Sverigedemokraterna vill också slå samman myndigheter och renodla offentliga verksamheter där det är möjligt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden Democrats also want to consolidate agencies and streamline public activities where possible.”
- minimum bureaucracy»minimum av byråkrati skall genomsyra all offentlig verksamhet.« (party programme ↗)“minimum bureaucracy shall permeate all public activities.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2025/26:KU29)
- Committee report full text (HD01KU29)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2025/26:100 — Antikorruptionsmyndighet under riksdagen av Josef Fransson (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:1267 — Säkerställande av statlig service i hela landet av Louise Thunström m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1278 — Begränsning av rätten till tolk av Josefin Malmqvist (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1427 — Politisk påverkan från statliga myndigheter av Sten Bergheden (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1432 — Konsekvensanalys för funktionshindersperspektiv av Markus Selin (S)
- Motion 2025/26:147 — Ledamotsrum på landets länsstyrelser av Eric Palmqvist (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:1530 — Förstärkt tjänstemannaansvar och transparens vid implementering av EU-regler av Emma Ahlström Köster m.fl. (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1564 — Tjänstemannaansvar av Larry Söder (KD)
- Motion 2025/26:1602 — Sverige behöver en avregleringsminister av Cecilia Rönn (L)
- Motion 2025/26:1631 — Stärkt rättssäkerhet och likvärdigt stöd för döva av Jessica Rodén och Louise Thunström (båda S)
- Motion 2025/26:1700 — Precisering av proportionalitetsprincipens tillämpning i förvaltningslagen av Staffan Eklöf (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:1731 — Effektiviseringsfunktion inom Regeringskansliet av Jan Ericson (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1744 — Myndigheters opinionsbildning av Jan Ericson m.fl. (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1763 — Tydliga myndighetsbeslut av Jan Ericson (M)
- Motion 2025/26:18 — Ett civilsamhälle skilt från staten av Josef Fransson (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:1839 — Justitiekanslerns resurser av Isak From och Anna-Caren Sätherberg (båda S)
- Motion 2025/26:1874 — Anmälningsplikt för medlemskap i ordenssällskap och hemliga sällskap av Tomas Kronståhl m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1946 — Demokratisk infrastruktur av Mikael Dahlqvist (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1967 — Borttagande av åldersgräns för landshövdingar av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2029 — Enklare för personer med nedsatt syn av Sten Bergheden (M)
Source: The Swedish Parliament