2025-05-142024/25:AU10 · p.9AULabour market

The Discrimination Ombudsman etc.

The role and working methods of the Equality Ombudsman

What's at stake: How actively the Equality Ombudsman works affects how many people subjected to discrimination get their case examined and a chance at redress. A broader mandate with more checks and stronger sanctions could increase pressure on employers, but would also change the agency's role.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

The question is whether the Equality Ombudsman's mandate and working methods should be changed - for example through more spot checks, more cases pursued, and the power to issue regulations along with higher sanction fees - or whether the current focus on individual cases is sufficient.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The committee rejects the motions. It welcomes the direction DO has already set, with increased focus on individual cases, and considers this in line with what the motions call for. The committee also points out that the EU directive on standards for equality bodies may require adjustments to DO's powers and operations, and considers that the ongoing preparatory work on implementing the directive should not be pre-empted.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 19 (C)

The reservation (C) calls for the Equality Ombudsman's mandate to be changed so the agency acts more actively against discrimination, including through more spot checks and by pursuing far more cases instead of primarily establishing case-law precedent. The reservation also supports giving DO the right to issue regulations that specify employers' obligations, and calls for consideration of higher sanction fees for those who fail in preventive work.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 19 by C.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
VNoYes 21/0/0/3departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
SNoAbstain 0/0/93/13departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed
MPNoAbstain 0/0/15/3departs from the planconfidence: highexplicit
Cown reservationNoNo 0/21/0/3follows the planconfidence: mediumderived
LNoYes 14/0/0/2departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
KDYesYes 16/0/0/3follows the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
MYesYes 60/0/0/8follows the planconfidence: lownot addressed
SDYesAbstain 0/0/63/9departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed

Committee proposal

The Riksdag rejects the motions 2024/25:434 by Serkan Köse (S) amendment 2, 2024/25:1412 by Michael Rubbestad et al. (SD) amendment 29, 2024/25:1650 by Lawen Redar (S), 2024/25:1775 by Leila Ali Elmi et al. (MP) amendments 1-3 and 7, 2024/25:2643 by Leila Ali Elmi et al. (MP) amendments 6 and 8-10, 2024/25:3072 by Ardalan Shekarabi et al. (S) amendment 11 and 2024/25:3159 by Malin Björk et al. (C) amendment 2.

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2024/25:434 av Serkan Köse (S) yrkande 2, 2024/25:1412 av Michael Rubbestad m.fl. (SD) yrkande 29, 2024/25:1650 av Lawen Redar (S), 2024/25:1775 av Leila Ali Elmi m.fl. (MP) yrkandena 1-3 och 7, 2024/25:2643 av Leila Ali Elmi m.fl. (MP) yrkandena 6 och 8-10, 2024/25:3072 av Ardalan Shekarabi m.fl. (S) yrkande 11 och 2024/25:3159 av Malin Björk m.fl. (C) yrkande 2.

Riksdag decision: The Riksdag rejected approximately 60 proposals in motions concerning gender equality and measures against discrimination. The Riksdag refers primarily to the fact that work is already underway in the area. The proposals were submitted during the general motion period 2024 and deal with, among other things, the objectives and methods of gender equality policy, equality data, discrimination on various grounds, amendments to the Discrimination Act, and the activities of the Discrimination Ombudsman.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan demands active work to prevent and stop discrimination and states that discrimination and racism in the labour market must be stopped.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan demands active work to prevent and stop discrimination and states that discrimination and racism in the labour market must be stopped. A supervisory mandate with more spot checks, more driven cases, regulations authority concerning employers' preventive obligations and raised sanction fees are precisely the tools that make the commitment effective. The plan moreover wants to see better possibilities to ensure that laws and agreements are observed in working life.

Original (Swedish)

Planen kräver ett aktivt arbete med att förebygga och hindra diskriminering och slår fast att diskrimineringen och rasismen på arbetsmarknaden måste stoppas. Ett tillsynsuppdrag med fler stickprov, fler drivna ärenden, föreskriftsrätt om arbetsgivarnas förebyggande skyldigheter och höjda sanktionsavgifter är just de verktyg som gör åtagandet verksamt. Planen vill dessutom se bättre möjligheter att säkerställa att lagar och avtal efterlevs i arbetslivet.

  • active work against discriminationdecisive»Det kräver ett aktivt arbete med att förebygga och« (party programme ↗)“It requires active work to prevent and”
  • stopped discrimination in working life»Diskrimineringen och rasismen på arbetsmarknaden måste stoppas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Discrimination and racism in the labour market must be stopped.”
  • compliance with laws and agreements»till exempel bättre möjligheter att säkerställa att lagar och avtal efter« (party programme ↗)“for example better possibilities to ensure that laws and agreements after”
  • authorities' special responsibility»Myndigheter har ett särskilt ansvar att möta alla människor« (party programme ↗)“Authorities have a special responsibility to meet all people”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

SSocialdemokraternaNoAbstaindeparts from the plannot addressed

The election manifesto commits to combating discrimination in the labour market, and the party programme wants to combat all forms of domination and subordination.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The election manifesto commits to combating discrimination in the labour market, and the party programme wants to combat all forms of domination and subordination. A more active oversight mandate with spot checks, regulatory authority and noticeable sanction fees is a tool for precisely that, since employers' preventive duties would otherwise be ineffective. The plan says nothing about the Equality Ombudsman's mandate, so the position is derived.

Original (Swedish)

Valmanifestet åtar sig att motarbeta diskrimineringen på arbetsmarknaden, och partiprogrammet vill bekämpa alla former av över- och underordning. Ett mer aktivt tillsynsuppdrag med stickprov, föreskriftsrätt och kännbara sanktionsavgifter är ett verktyg för just det, eftersom arbetsgivarnas förebyggande skyldigheter annars blir verkningslösa. Planen säger inget om DO:s uppdrag, så ställningstagandet är härlett.

  • combat discrimination in working lifedecisive»Diskrimineringen på arbetsmarknaden ska motarbetas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Discrimination in the labour market shall be combated.”
  • combat power differences»Socialdemokratin vill se ett samhälle utan över- och underordning, och bekämpar därför« (party programme ↗)“Social democracy wants to see a society without domination and subordination, and therefore combats”
  • equality policy against all forms»Jämlikhetspolitik måste riktas mot alla former av över- och underordning, och dessa måste« (party programme ↗)“Equality policy must be directed against all forms of domination and subordination, and these must”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MPMiljöpartietNoAbstaindeparts from the planexplicit

The plan establishes that strong legislation and a strong discrimination ombudsperson are required and that the work against all forms of discrimination must become more effective.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan establishes that strong legislation and a strong discrimination ombudsperson are required and that the work against all forms of discrimination must become more effective. A more active supervisory mandate with more random checks, more prosecuted cases, authority to issue regulations and higher sanction fees is precisely a strengthening of the Discrimination Ombudsperson in that direction. The plan also wants to strengthen the individual's opportunity to have their case examined.

Original (Swedish)

Planen slår fast att det krävs en stark lagstiftning och en stark diskrimineringsombudsman och att arbetet mot alla former av diskriminering måste bli effektivare. Ett mer aktivt tillsynsuppdrag med fler stickprov, fler drivna fall, föreskriftsrätt och högre sanktionsavgifter är just en förstärkning av DO i den riktningen. Planen vill också stärka den enskildes möjlighet att få sin sak prövad.

  • strong discrimination ombudspersondecisive»Det krävs också en stark lagstiftning och en stark diskrimineringsombudsman.« (party programme ↗)“Strong legislation and a strong discrimination ombudsperson are also required.”
  • more effective anti-discrimination work»arbete mot alla former av diskriminering.« (party programme ↗)“work against all forms of discrimination.”
  • strengthened legislation and legal aid»stärka lagstiftningen mot diskriminering och se över rätten till rättshjälp i diskrimineringsfall.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“strengthen legislation against discrimination and review the right to legal aid in discrimination cases.”

The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.

CCenterpartietNoNofollows the planderived

The plan establishes that more must be done against discrimination and explicitly wants to strengthen agencies' work against discrimination and increase compensation to those who have been subjected to it.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan establishes that more must be done against discrimination and explicitly wants to strengthen agencies' work against discrimination and increase compensation to those who have been subjected to it. A more active supervisory mandate with more pursued cases directly addresses that commitment, as does the principle that everyone should be able to get their case heard. The plan's ambition to clean up the regulatory burden for businesses certainly pulls in the other direction regarding regulations and sanction fees, but carries less weight.

Original (Swedish)

Planen slår fast att mer måste göras mot diskriminering och vill uttryckligen stärka myndigheternas arbete mot diskriminering samt höja ersättningen till dem som utsatts. Ett mer aktivt tillsynsuppdrag med fler drivna fall svarar direkt mot det åtagandet, liksom mot principen att alla ska kunna få sin sak prövad. Planens ambition att rensa i regelbördan för företag drar visserligen åt andra hållet i fråga om föreskrifter och sanktionsavgifter, men väger lättare.

  • strengthened agency work against discriminationdecisive»Mer måste göras mot diskriminering. Vi vill stärka myndigheternas arbete mot diskriminering och höja ersättningen till dem som utsatts, samt lägga till kön och funktionsnedsättning som hatbrottsgrunder.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“More must be done against discrimination. We want to strengthen agencies' work against discrimination and increase compensation to those who have been subjected to it, and add gender and disability as hate crime grounds.”
  • right to have one's case heard»Alla som bor i Sverige ska kunna få sin sak prövad.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Everyone living in Sweden should be able to get their case heard.”
  • oppose all discrimination»Diskriminering, strukturell rasism och intolerans, i alla dess former, ska motverkas.« (party programme ↗)“Discrimination, structural racism and intolerance, in all its forms, must be opposed.”
  • regulatory simplification for businesses»Rensa upp i regelträsket för entreprenörer, stora som små.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Clean up the regulatory maze for entrepreneurs, large and small.”
LLiberalernaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan explicitly wants to increase pressure on employers to offer equal pay and conditions, and establishes that discrimination must carry a cost and that those affected must be able to obtain redress.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan explicitly wants to increase pressure on employers to offer equal pay and conditions, and establishes that discrimination must carry a cost and that those affected must be able to obtain redress. A more active supervisory mandate with more spot checks, more prosecuted cases and increased sanction fees are instruments for precisely that commitment. The plan also calls for systematic oversight and a modernized discrimination law, which supports reviewing the powers of the Equality Ombudsman.

Original (Swedish)

Planen vill uttryckligen öka trycket på arbetsgivare att erbjuda jämställda löner och villkor, och slår fast att det ska kosta att diskriminera och att den drabbade ska kunna få upprättelse. Ett mer aktivt tillsynsuppdrag med fler stickprov, fler drivna fall och höjda sanktionsavgifter är instrument för just det åtagandet. Planen efterlyser också systematisk tillsyn och en moderniserad diskrimineringslag, vilket stödjer att DO:s befogenheter ses över.

  • increased pressure on employersdecisive»Vi vill öka trycket på arbetsgivare att erbjuda jämställda löner och villkor, och sänka skatten på sparande så att fler kan bygga upp en buffert.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to increase pressure on employers to offer equal pay and conditions, and lower the tax on savings so more can build up a buffer.”
  • discrimination must carry a cost»kosta att diskriminera och den som drabbas ska kunna få hjälp att få upprättelse.« (party programme ↗)“discrimination must carry a cost and those affected must be able to get help obtaining redress.”
  • systematic oversight»Systematisk tillsyn behövs för att få bort enkelt avhjälpta hinder.« (party programme ↗)“Systematic oversight is needed to remove easily remedied barriers.”
  • modernize the discrimination law»Vi vill modernisera diskrimineringslagen, prioritera polisens hatbrottsverksamhet och säkerställa att alla skolor står upp för alla människors lika värde.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to modernize the discrimination law, prioritize police hate crime work and ensure that all schools stand up for the equal worth of all people.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

KDKristdemokraternaYesYesfollows the plannot addressed

The party programme requires that bureaucracy and complicated rules be countered and that new laws be tested from a small business perspective.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The party programme requires that bureaucracy and complicated rules be countered and that new laws be tested from a small business perspective. Giving the regulatory authority the power to set rules over employers' obligations and raising sanction fees places a heavier regulatory burden on employers, which the plan does not support. The plan at the same time requires well-functioning laws against all discrimination in working life, which qualifies the stance.

Original (Swedish)

Partiprogrammet kräver att byråkrati och krångliga regler motverkas och att tillkommande lagar prövas ur ett småföretagarperspektiv. Att ge tillsynsmyndigheten föreskriftsrätt över arbetsgivares skyldigheter och höja sanktionsavgifterna lägger en tyngre regelbörda på arbetsgivarna, vilket planen inte ger stöd för. Planen kräver samtidigt väl fungerande lagar mot all diskriminering i arbetslivet, vilket kvalificerar ställningstagandet.

  • small business perspective on rulesdecisive»Tillkommande lagar bör prövas ur ett småföretagarperspektiv.« (party programme ↗)“New laws should be tested from a small business perspective.”
  • less regulatory red tape»Byråkrati och krångliga regler ska motverkas.« (party programme ↗)“Bureaucracy and complicated rules shall be countered.”
  • laws against discrimination in working life»Väl fungerande lagar mot all diskriminering i arbetslivet ska finnas.« (party programme ↗)“Well-functioning laws against all discrimination in working life shall exist.”
MModeraternaYesYesfollows the plannot addressed

The plan wants to significantly reduce the regulatory burden and administrative costs for companies and states that the state shall prioritise its core mission and act cautiously in other areas.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan wants to significantly reduce the regulatory burden and administrative costs for companies and states that the state shall prioritise its core mission and act cautiously in other areas. An expanded supervisory mandate with more random inspections, rule-making authority on employers' obligations and increased penalty fees go in the opposite direction. The plan therefore argues against the counter-proposal's demands.

Original (Swedish)

Planen vill kraftigt minska regelbördan och administrationskostnaderna för företagen och slår fast att staten ska prioritera sitt grunduppdrag och agera med försiktighet på andra områden. Ett utvidgat tillsynsuppdrag med fler stickprovskontroller, föreskriftsrätt om arbetsgivares skyldigheter och höjda sanktionsavgifter går i motsatt riktning. Planen talar därför emot motförslagets krav.

  • less red tapedecisive»Ta bort en tredjedel av företagens administrationskostnader och en tredjedel av regelkrånglet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Remove one-third of companies' administrative costs and one-third of red tape”
  • the state prioritises core tasks»Den prioriterar sitt grunduppdrag« (party programme ↗)“It prioritises its core mission”
  • limited political ambition»Vi måste alltid se upp med att politikens ambitioner« (party programme ↗)“We must always be careful that policy's ambitions”
SDSverigedemokraternaYesAbstaindeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan wants to remove unnecessary rules where the costs to businesses do not match the benefit and relieve enterprises' administrative burden, and to streamline and consolidate agencies rather than expand them.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan wants to remove unnecessary rules where the costs to businesses do not match the benefit and relieve enterprises' administrative burden, and to streamline and consolidate agencies rather than expand them. An expanded supervisory mandate with more spot checks, rule-making power over employers' preventive work and increased sanction fees goes in the opposite direction. The plan therefore argues against the counter-proposal's demands.

Original (Swedish)

Planen vill ta bort onödiga regler där kostnaderna för företagen inte motsvarar nyttan och avlasta företagens administrativa börda, samt renodla och slå samman myndigheter i stället för att bygga ut dem. Ett utvidgat tillsynsuppdrag med fler stickprov, föreskriftsrätt över arbetsgivarnas förebyggande arbete och höjda sanktionsavgifter går i motsatt riktning. Planen talar därför emot motförslagets krav.

  • remove unnecessary rulesdecisive»För att få fler och växande företag är det viktigt att ta bort onödiga regler där kostnaderna för företagen inte motsvarar nyttan för samhället.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“To get more and growing enterprises it is important to remove unnecessary rules where the costs to businesses do not match the benefit to society.”
  • reduced regulatory burden»Verka för regelförenkling och avlasta småföretagens administrativa börda« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Work for regulatory simplification and relieve small enterprises' administrative burden”
  • against activist agencies»anställning av personal på myndigheter som driver aktivistisk symbolpolitik« (2022 manifesto ↗)“employment of personnel at agencies conducting activist symbol politics”
  • streamlined agencies»Stoppa slöseriet inom myndigheterna och slå samman myndigheter« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Stop waste in agencies and consolidate agencies”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament