2026-03-182025/26:FöU10 · p.14FöUDefence
Giving and receiving military support
Swedish oversight of materiel in other countries' military depots under the defence cooperation agreement
What's at stake: The agreement allows another state's military to establish materiel depots on Swedish territory without Swedish authorities necessarily having insight into or control over their contents, raising the question of where the line lies between being a reliable ally and retaining national control over what is stored on one's own soil.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether Swedish authorities should be given an explicit right to inspect what is stored in military depots that other countries maintain on Swedish territory under the defence cooperation agreement, or whether the current direction for giving and receiving military support - including the already approved agreement - should apply without such an addition.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee is positive that the development of the Nordic defence cooperation JEF has progressed and sees no reason for further measures. The committee stresses that the collective defence commitment within NATO is central to Swedish security and defence policy, that Sweden should be a credible and loyal ally capable of providing host-nation support with both military and civil resources, and that the already approved defence cooperation agreement is intended to enable parts of this. The committee assumes that the capability to give and receive support among allies continues to develop within the framework set by the Riksdag, and rejects the motions.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 32 (V)
The reservation (V) notes that it is unclear whether Sweden can refuse if the United States wants access to or use of a facility in a way that conflicts with Swedish interests, since the agreement gives the United States the right to establish weapons depots without Swedish authorities being given insight and control, and control of American vehicles and vessels is likewise not considered possible without American approval. The reservation therefore calls for the Swedish state, through an authority, to be given the ability to inspect what is stored in depots that other countries' militaries maintain on Swedish territory.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 32 by V.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | No 0/15/0/7 | follows the plan | confidence: high | explicit |
| S | No | Abstain 0/0/93/13 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| MP | No | Abstain 0/0/16/2 | departs from the plan | confidence: high | explicit |
| C | No | Abstain 0/0/21/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| L | Yes | Yes 10/0/0/6 | follows the plan | confidence: low | derived |
| KD | No | Yes 17/0/0/2 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| M | Yes | Yes 60/0/0/8 | follows the plan | confidence: low | derived |
| SD | No | Yes 62/0/0/9 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | derived |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2025/26:102 by Hanna Gunnarsson et al. (V) demand 5, 2025/26:2822 by Mikael Larsson et al. (C) demand 4, 2025/26:3408 by Emma Berginger et al. (MP) demand 3 and 2025/26:3556 by Peter Hultqvist et al. (S) demands 41 and 42.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2025/26:102 av Hanna Gunnarsson m.fl. (V) yrkande 5, 2025/26:2822 av Mikael Larsson m.fl. (C) yrkande 4, 2025/26:3408 av Emma Berginger m.fl. (MP) yrkande 3 och 2025/26:3556 av Peter Hultqvist m.fl. (S) yrkandena 41 och 42.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag said no to 160 proposals on total defence. The proposals were submitted during the general motion period of 2025 and concern, among other things, the Defence Force's operational capability and war organization, training activities and Sweden's support to Ukraine. The Riksdag refers primarily to the considerations made in the decision on total defence for the period 2025–2030 remaining in place and to the ongoing work in many of the various areas that the proposers raised.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to give Swedish state the possibility to control the contents of weapons depots. (V) — Reservation 32
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan wants to tear up the host nation agreement with NATO and opposes ever deeper military cooperation with NATO, with a view to leaving the alliance.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to tear up the host nation agreement with NATO and opposes ever deeper military cooperation with NATO, with a view to leaving the alliance. It moreover demands that Sweden is free from foreign military bases and forbids nuclear weapons on Swedish territory. A demand for Swedish state control over what other countries' militaries store on Swedish territory thus lies directly in the plan's line.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill riva upp värdlandsavtalet med Nato och motsätter sig ett allt djupare militärt samarbete med Nato, med sikte på att lämna alliansen. Den kräver dessutom att Sverige är fritt från främmande militärbaser och förbjuder kärnvapen på svensk mark. Ett krav på svensk myndighetskontroll över vad andra länders militär lagrar på svenskt territorium ligger därför direkt i planens linje.
- tear up the host nation agreementdecisive»Vänsterpartiet vill att Sverige river upp värdlandsavtalet med NATO.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Left Party wants Sweden to tear up the host nation agreement with NATO.”
- against deepened NATO cooperation»Därför är Vänsterpartiet motståndare till Sveriges allt djupare militära samarbete med NATO och EU, och vi är det enda riksdagspartiet som konsekvent värnar och vill återupprätta svensk alliansfrihet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Therefore Left Party is opposed to Sweden's ever deeper military cooperation with NATO and EU, and we are the only Riksdag party that consistently values and wants to restore Swedish non-alignment.”
- no nuclear weapons on Swedish territory»Vi vill se ett förbud mot kärnvapen på svensk mark och arbetar för en« (party programme ↗)“We want to see a ban on nuclear weapons on Swedish territory and work for a”
- leave NATO»med sikte på att lämna Nato.« (party programme ↗)“with a view to leaving NATO.”
The plan makes sovereignty and protection of Swedish freedom of action the purpose of security policy and moreover requires that no nuclear weapons exist on Swedish territory, which presupposes Swedish oversight of what other countries' militaries store here.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan makes sovereignty and protection of Swedish freedom of action the purpose of security policy and moreover requires that no nuclear weapons exist on Swedish territory, which presupposes Swedish oversight of what other countries' militaries store here. That bears the counter-proposal's requirement for an authority with control possibilities. The plan simultaneously stands behind NATO membership, but that does not abolish the requirement for national control.
Original (Swedish)
Planen gör suveräniteten och skyddet av svensk handlingsfrihet till säkerhetspolitikens syfte och kräver dessutom att inga kärnvapen finns på svenskt territorium, vilket förutsätter svensk insyn i vad andra länders militär lagrar här. Det bär motförslagets krav på en myndighet med kontrollmöjlighet. Planen står samtidigt bakom Natomedlemskapet, men det upphäver inte kravet på nationell rådighet.
- nuclear weapons-free territorydecisive»Inga kärnvapen på svenskt territorium.« (party programme ↗)“No nuclear weapons on Swedish territory.”
- protected Swedish sovereignty»Sveriges säkerhetspolitik syftar till att bevara vårt lands fred, vår demokrati och vår suveränitet.« (party programme ↗)“Swedish security policy aims to preserve our country's peace, our democracy and our sovereignty.”
- Swedish NATO membership»Sverige ska gå med i Nato.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden shall join NATO.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan requires a law that prohibits nuclear weapons on Swedish soil and establishes that NATO should have neither permanent troops nor bases on Swedish territory.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires a law that prohibits nuclear weapons on Swedish soil and establishes that NATO should have neither permanent troops nor bases on Swedish territory. Swedish oversight and control over what foreign powers store in the country is a prerequisite for those commitments. The plan also requires that NATO membership be combined with an independent foreign and security policy.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver en lag som förbjuder kärnvapen på svensk mark och slår fast att Nato varken ska ha permanenta trupper eller baser på svenskt territorium. Svensk insyn och kontroll över vad främmande makt lagrar i landet är en förutsättning för de åtagandena. Planen kräver också att Natomedlemskapet förenas med en självständig utrikes- och säkerhetspolitik.
- ban on nuclear weapons on Swedish soildecisive»införa en lag som förbjuder kärnvapen på svensk mark.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“introduce a law that prohibits nuclear weapons on Swedish soil.”
- no foreign bases in Sweden»ha permanenta trupper eller baser på svenskt territorium.« (party programme ↗)“have permanent troops or bases on Swedish territory.”
- independent security policy»Sveriges medlemskap i Nato måste förenas med en självständig utrikes- och« (party programme ↗)“Sweden's NATO membership must be combined with an independent foreign and”
- nuclear-weapon-free zone»Sverige ska vara en kärnvapenfri zon i både freds- och krigstid.« (party programme ↗)“Sweden should be a nuclear-weapon-free zone in both peacetime and wartime.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan does not address transparency in or control of stores that other countries' militaries hold on Swedish territory.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan does not address transparency in or control of stores that other countries' militaries hold on Swedish territory. The nearest governing principle is that Sweden should become even more transparent and that the exercise of power should occur under openness and control. Based on that principle, the plan supports the notion that a Swedish authority should be able to control what such stores contain, while the plan wants to complete NATO accession.
Original (Swedish)
Planen behandlar inte insyn i eller kontroll av lager som andra länders militär håller på svenskt territorium. Närmast liggande princip är att Sverige ska bli ännu mer transparent och att maktutövning ska ske under öppenhet och kontroll. Utifrån den principen talar planen för att en svensk myndighet ska kunna kontrollera vad sådana lager innehåller, samtidigt som planen vill fullfölja Nato-inträdet.
- increased transparencydecisive»Sverige ska bli ännu mer transparent. Vi vill inrätta en antikorruptionsmyndighet, skärpa regler mot korruption och införa ett lobbyregister.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden should become even more transparent. We want to establish an anti-corruption agency, tighten rules against corruption and introduce a lobbying register.”
- openness as a democratic requirement»Öppenhet och transparens är grundförutsättningar för frihet, demokrati och för att förhindra korruption och övergrepp.« (party programme ↗)“Openness and transparency are basic prerequisites for freedom, democracy and for preventing corruption and abuses.”
- complete NATO accession»Centerpartiet vill rusta försvaret, stärka Sveriges civila beredskap och fullfölja inträdet i Nato.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Centre Party wants to strengthen defence, strengthen Sweden's civil preparedness and complete NATO accession.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan establishes that security is created in alliances and that Sweden within NATO shall particularly be able to contribute with the infrastructure that provides strategic depth for the defense of Finland and the Baltics.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that security is created in alliances and that Sweden within NATO shall particularly be able to contribute with the infrastructure that provides strategic depth for the defense of Finland and the Baltics. A new Swedish control requirement over allies' stocks on Swedish territory pulls in the opposite direction. The plan does not directly address the question, which is why the conclusion is derived and uncertain.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att trygghet skapas i allianser och att Sverige inom Nato särskilt ska bidra med den infrastruktur som ger strategiskt djup för försvaret av Finland och Baltikum. Ett nytt svenskt kontrollkrav över allierades lager på svenskt territorium drar åt motsatt håll. Planen behandlar inte frågan direkt, varför slutsatsen är härledd och osäker.
- infrastructure for allied defensedecisive»Sverige ska inom Nato särskilt kunna bidra med den infrastruktur som behövs för att skapa ett nödvändigt och strategiskt djup för försvaret av Finland och Baltikum.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden shall within NATO particularly be able to contribute with the infrastructure needed to create necessary and strategic depth for the defense of Finland and the Baltics.”
- security in alliances»I dag skapas trygghet i allianser, inte i allianslöshet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Today security is created in alliances, not in non-alignment.”
- NATO as cornerstone»Nato är den absolut viktigaste samarbetsorganisationen för säkerhet och« (party programme ↗)“NATO is the absolutely most important cooperation organization for security and”
- cooperation with democracies»Grunden för Sveriges säkerhetspolitik ska vara samarbete med andra« (party programme ↗)“The basis for Sweden's security policy shall be cooperation with other”
The plan stipulates that Swedish military operations are carried out only after independent Swedish decisions and that each member state must independently get to decide on its participation, which supports the requirement for Swedish oversight and control over what foreign military stores on Swedish territory.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan stipulates that Swedish military operations are carried out only after independent Swedish decisions and that each member state must independently get to decide on its participation, which supports the requirement for Swedish oversight and control over what foreign military stores on Swedish territory. The task of defence to protect territorial integrity points in the same direction. NATO membership is according to the plan a natural part of security policy, but it does not abolish the requirement for Swedish self-determination.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att svenska militära insatser genomförs först efter självständiga svenska beslut och att varje medlemsstat självständigt måste få ta ställning till sitt deltagande, vilket bär kravet på svensk insyn och kontroll över vad andra länders militär förvarar på svenskt territorium. Försvarets uppgift att värna territoriell integritet pekar åt samma håll. Nato-medlemskapet är enligt planen en naturlig del av säkerhetspolitiken, men det upphäver inte kravet på svenskt självbestämmande.
- Swedish self-determinationdecisive»Svenska militära insatser ska genomföras först efter självständiga svenska beslut.« (party programme ↗)“Swedish military operations shall be carried out only after independent Swedish decisions.”
- national decision-making in alliances»Varje medlemsstat måste självständigt få ta ställning till deltagande i ett eventuellt« (party programme ↗)“Each member state must independently get to decide on participation in a possible”
- territorial integrity»genom att värna territoriell integritet och utöva gränsskydd samt värna fredstida yttre« (party programme ↗)“by protecting territorial integrity and exercising border control and protecting external”
- NATO as part of security policy»vårt medlemskap är en integrerad och naturlig del av svensk säkerhetspolitik.« (party programme ↗)“our membership is an integrated and natural part of Swedish security policy.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan sets a high ambition level for Sweden as a NATO member and wants us to contribute concretely to the defence of neighbouring countries, which presupposes trusting host nation support.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan sets a high ambition level for Sweden as a NATO member and wants us to contribute concretely to the defence of neighbouring countries, which presupposes trusting host nation support. A special Swedish control body over allies' supplies on Swedish territory does not align with that. The plan simultaneously protects the hard core of the state, which gives some support to the concern the counter-proposal expresses.
Original (Swedish)
Planen sätter en hög ambitionsnivå för Sverige som Natomedlem och vill att vi bidrar konkret till försvaret av grannländerna, vilket förutsätter förtroendefullt värdlandsstöd. Ett särskilt svenskt kontrollorgan över allierades förråd på svenskt territorium ligger inte i den linjen. Planen värnar samtidigt statens hårda kärna, vilket ger visst stöd åt oron motförslaget uttrycker.
- high NATO ambitiondecisive»Moderaterna vill sätta en hög ambitionsnivå för Sverige som blivande Natomedlem.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Moderates want to set a high ambition level for Sweden as a future NATO member.”
- security producer among allies»Sverige bör bidra konkret till skyddet av våra vänner i de baltiska länderna, exempelvis genom att överväga att skicka bidrag till Natos stridsgrupper eller att delta med vårt stridsflyg i Natos incidentberedskap.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden should contribute concretely to the protection of our friends in the Baltic countries, for example by considering sending contributions to NATO battle groups or participating with our fighter jets in NATO's incident readiness.”
- full NATO membership»Vi välkomnar därför att Sverige ska gå med i Nato, en fråga vi drivit under 20 års tid.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We therefore welcome Sweden joining NATO, a matter we have championed for 20 years.”
- Swedish sovereignty»Statens hårda kärna får aldrig vara förhandlingsbar.« (party programme ↗)“The hard core of the state shall never be negotiable.”
The counter-proposal demands that the Swedish state through an agency shall be able to control what other countries' military stores on Swedish territory.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The counter-proposal demands that the Swedish state through an agency shall be able to control what other countries' military stores on Swedish territory. The plan's overarching principle is that Swedish popular sovereignty's independence and national self-determination shall be strengthened, and that defence is the ultimate guarantor of national self-determination. At the same time the plan affirms defence alliances such as NATO, which makes the conclusion uncertain.
Original (Swedish)
Motförslaget kräver att svenska staten genom en myndighet ska kunna kontrollera vad andra länders militär lagrar på svenskt territorium. Planens genomgående princip är att det svenska folkstyrets oberoende och det nationella självbestämmandet ska stärkas, och att försvaret är den yttersta garanten för nationellt självbestämmande. Samtidigt bejakar planen försvarsallianser som Nato, vilket gör slutsatsen osäker.
- Swedish independencedecisive»Bejaka och stärka det svenska folkstyrets oberoende« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Affirm and strengthen Swedish popular sovereignty's independence”
- defence protects self-determination»Sverigedemokraterna ser det militära försvaret som den yttersta garanten för« (party programme ↗)“Sweden Democrats view military defence as the ultimate guarantor of”
- national self-determination»Stärka det nationella självbestämmandet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strengthen national self-determination”
- defence cooperation affirmed»Genom bilaterala- och internationella avtal, samarbeten och försvarsallianser såsom« (party programme ↗)“Through bilateral and international treaties, cooperation and defence alliances such as”
Worldstate weighed in: The USA and Israel launched an attack on Iran on 28 February 2026 — American use of materiel and facilities on Swedish soil becomes an acute question of Swedish control, which raises the plan's principle of national self-determination
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2025/26:FöU10)
- Committee report full text (HD01FöU10)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2025/26:1002 — Svenskar som har försvarat Ukraina av Magnus Jacobsson (KD)
- Motion 2025/26:102 — Uppsägning av DCA-avtalet med USA av Hanna Gunnarsson m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2025/26:1054 — Mänsklighetens utveckling och de existentiella hoten av Jamal El-Haj (-)
- Motion 2025/26:1069 — Norrbottens strategiska roll i en ny tid av Fredrik Lundh Sammeli m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1238 — Värnande av Vätterns vatten av Niklas Sigvardsson m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1443 — Prioritering av den nationella säkerheten framför andra intressen vid offentlig upphandling eller utländska investeringar i Sverige av Patrik Lundqvist m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1616 — Ett robust försvar i Halland av Jennie Nilsson m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1659 — Stärkt försvar av Göteborg och västkusten av David Josefsson och Marie-Louise Hänel Sandström (båda M)
- Motion 2025/26:1662 — En självständig och säker livsmedelsförsörjning för Sverige och Norden av Emma Ahlström Köster (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1891 — Snabbare uppbyggnad av krigssjukvård till stöd för Ukraina av Magnus Resare (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1892 — Säkerställd tillgång till ortopedisk specialistkompetens i krigssjukvård av Magnus Resare (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1971 — Nationell preppingkampanj av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2031 — Plan för att säkra tillverkningen av skyddsutrustning i Sverige av Sten Bergheden (M)
- Motion 2025/26:225 — Återupprättande av Kalixlinjen av Björn Tidland (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:226 — Införande av drönargrupper i det svenska försvaret av Björn Tidland (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:23 — Krigsmateriel och miljöregler av Josef Fransson (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:2402 — Ukraina i Joint Expeditionary Force av Markus Wiechel (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:2475 — Försvaret av Gotland av Jesper Skalberg Karlsson (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2491 — Totalförsvarets behov av skjutbanor av Jesper Skalberg Karlsson (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2503 — Stärkt roll för Sörmland i totalförsvaret av Anna af Sillén och Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (båda M)
Source: The Swedish Parliament