2023-04-272022/23:AU9 · p.4AULabour market
The Swedish Employment Agency
The role, reform and local presence of the Swedish Public Employment Service
What's at stake: The outcome affects how job seekers are met by the employment agency — the degree of individualized support — and whether the agency has a clear mandate to maintain a physical presence nationwide, particularly in disadvantaged areas.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The vote concerns whether the ongoing reform of the Swedish Public Employment Service — including delivery of services by providers and unchanged organization of its local presence — should continue as is, or whether the agency should instead get more discretion to tailor support to individual needs and an explicit mandate to strengthen its physical presence nationwide, including in areas with socioeconomic challenges.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee rejects the motions. The main regulatory framework for reforming the employment agency is now in place, providing better conditions for labour-market measures to be delivered by providers and for the agency's operations to develop and become more efficient. The agency is to remain the responsible authority in the field, with an active role in designing, coordinating and referring people to measures carried out together with independent actors. The committee is following the government's and the agency's ongoing work, including the rollout of further-developed matching services, and sees no reason to take further initiatives on local presence at this time.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 4 (S)
The reservation argues that the employment agency, as the state's labour-market expert authority, should be given more discretion to choose measures based on the individual job seeker's needs in order to better lead to lasting employment. It stresses that the agency's physical presence nationwide is a precondition for people to get the right support, as well as for proper employer contacts and cooperation with municipalities, and calls for a continued mandate to strengthen its presence particularly in areas with socioeconomic challenges.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 4 by S.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have held
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: MPMiljöpartiet
Ja 188–94Ja 172–110
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Yes 20/0/0/4 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| S | No | No 0/94/0/13 | match | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| MP | No | Yes 16/0/0/2 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| C | No | Abstain 0/0/20/4 | differs | confidence: low | derived |
| L | Yes | Yes 13/0/0/3 | match | confidence: low | derived |
| KD | Yes | Yes 16/0/0/3 | match | confidence: low | derived |
| M | Yes | Yes 60/0/0/8 | match | confidence: medium | derived |
| SD | Yes | Yes 63/0/0/10 | match | confidence: medium | derived |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2022/23:852 by Jonny Cato et al. (C) demands 1 and 2, 2022/23:1197 by Peter Hedberg and Peder Björk (both S), 2022/23:1672 by Annie Lööf et al. (C) demand 34, 2022/23:2032 by Heléne Björklund et al. (S) and 2022/23:2052 by Teresa Carvalho et al. (S) demands 3, 8 and 9.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2022/23:852 av Jonny Cato m.fl. (C) yrkandena 1 och 2, 2022/23:1197 av Peter Hedberg och Peder Björk (båda S), 2022/23:1672 av Annie Lööf m.fl. (C) yrkande 34, 2022/23:2032 av Heléne Björklund m.fl. (S) och 2022/23:2052 av Teresa Carvalho m.fl. (S) yrkandena 3, 8 och 9.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag said no to approximately 80 proposals on labor market policy questions. The motions deal with, among other things, the Swedish Employment Agency, labor market policy initiatives and unemployment insurance. The proposals were submitted during the general motion period of 2022. The Riksdag rejects the motions and refers, among other things, to the fact that investigative work in the field is ongoing.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants the state to actively use its ownership in Lernia AB to support training needs in green industrial development, particularly in northern Sweden. (S) — Reservation 4
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan states that welfare and societal service must exist everywhere and that privatizations have led to worse and unequal access to service depending on where you live.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan states that welfare and societal service must exist everywhere and that privatizations have led to worse and unequal access to service depending on where you live. It demands targeted state support to rural areas and areas with high deprivation and full employment as a political goal. An employment agency with its own discretion and physical presence throughout the country, particularly in socioeconomically disadvantaged areas, thus aligns with the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att välfärd och samhällsservice ska finnas överallt och att privatiseringar lett till sämre och ojämlik tillgång till service beroende på var man bor. Den kräver riktade statliga stöd till landsbygd och miljonprogramsområden och full sysselsättning som politiskt mål. En arbetsförmedling med egen handlingsfrihet och fysisk närvaro i hela landet, särskilt i socioekonomiskt utsatta områden, ligger därmed i linje med planen.
- public service throughout the countrydecisive»Välfärden måste vara till för alla och finnas överallt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Welfare must be for everyone and exist everywhere.”
- privatization worsens service»Privatiseringar har lett till dyrare elpris, att apoteken flyttar från landsbygd till städer och från fattiga till rika områden, att du har olika tillgång till vård, skola och omsorg beroende på var du bor, att det gått inflation i betygen och till en allt sämre kvalitet på service och välfärd.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Privatizations have led to higher electricity prices, pharmacies moving from rural areas to cities and from poor to rich areas, that you have different access to care, school and care depending on where you live, that it has gone inflation in grades and to ever worse quality of service and welfare.”
- targeted support to disadvantaged areas»landsbygd och storstäders miljonprogramsområden.« (party programme ↗)“rural areas and major cities' million-programme areas.”
- full employment as goal»Ändå är det bara ett parti i riksdagen som har en politik för full sysselsättning – Vänsterpartiet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Yet there is only one party in the Riksdag that has a policy for full employment – Left Party.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto establishes that the state shall be present throughout the country and that active labour market policy is particularly important in turbulent times, and that the unemployed in Sweden should primarily come into work.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto establishes that the state shall be present throughout the country and that active labour market policy is particularly important in turbulent times, and that the unemployed in Sweden should primarily come into work. The party programme sees active labour market policy as the key to matching the unemployed to jobs. Requirements for continued physical presence and greater discretion for the authority to choose interventions follow from this, even though the authority's organisation is not explicitly addressed.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet slår fast att staten ska finnas närvarande i hela landet och att en aktiv arbetsmarknadspolitik är särskilt viktig i oroliga tider, och att arbetslösa i Sverige i första hand ska komma i arbete. Partiprogrammet ser den aktiva arbetsmarknadspolitiken som nyckeln till att matcha arbetslösa mot jobb. Krav på fortsatt fysisk närvaro och större handlingsfrihet för myndigheten att välja insatser följer av detta, även om myndighetens organisation inte behandlas uttryckligen.
- state presence throughout the countrydecisive»Staten ska finnas närvarande i hela landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The state shall be present throughout the country.”
- active labour market policy»En aktiv arbetsmarknadspolitik för fler jobb är särskilt viktig i ekonomiskt oroliga tider.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“An active labour market policy for more jobs is particularly important in economically turbulent times.”
- interventions matched to individual needs»En aktiv arbetsmarknadspolitik gör det lättare för arbetslösa att hitta nya jobb och« (party programme ↗)“An active labour market policy makes it easier for the unemployed to find new jobs and”
- the unemployed in Sweden first»I första hand ska arbetslösa i Sverige komma i arbete.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“In the first instance, the unemployed in Sweden should come into work.”
The plan explicitly states that public functions such as the employment agency should be available to all residents and be accessible throughout the country, which is the counter-proposal's requirement for physical presence.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan explicitly states that public functions such as the employment agency should be available to all residents and be accessible throughout the country, which is the counter-proposal's requirement for physical presence. It also gives society responsibility to actively support individuals' path to employment through measures adapted to the person. The plan also wants to invest heavily in socioeconomically disadvantaged areas and see equal efforts from the employment agency.
Original (Swedish)
Planen säger uttryckligen att samhällsfunktioner som arbetsförmedlingen ska vara till för alla invånare och finnas tillgängliga över hela landet, vilket är motförslagets krav på fysisk närvaro. Den ger också samhället ansvar att aktivt stödja individens väg till arbete med insatser anpassade till personen. Planen vill dessutom storsatsa i socioekonomiskt eftersatta områden och se jämställda insatser från arbetsförmedlingen.
- authorities present throughout the countrydecisive»ska vara till för Sveriges alla invånare och finnas tillgängliga över hela landet.« (party programme ↗)“shall be available to all Sweden's residents and be accessible throughout the country.”
- individually adapted support for work»stödja individens möjligheter till arbete exempelvis« (party programme ↗)“support individuals' opportunities for employment for example”
- efforts in disadvantaged areas»storsatsa på det förebyggande arbetet i socioekonomiskt eftersatta områden.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“invest heavily in preventive work in socioeconomically disadvantaged areas.”
- equal efforts from the employment agency»stärk utrikesfödda kvinnors etablering genom SFI kombinerad med praktik och yrkesutbildning och jämställda insatser från arbetsförmedlingen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“strengthen immigrant women's establishment through Swedish for Immigrants (SFI) combined with internships and vocational training and equal efforts from the employment agency.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan requires that public service be close and reliable throughout the country and that everyone has the right to an effective matching service based on individual needs.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that public service be close and reliable throughout the country and that everyone has the right to an effective matching service based on individual needs. The requirement for continued physical presence, especially in areas with socioeconomic challenges, aligns with this. The plan, however, is built on operations in large part being carried out by independent providers, which makes support for expanded government powers weak.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att offentlig service ska vara nära och pålitlig i hela landet och att alla ska ha rätt till en effektiv matchningstjänst som utgår från den enskildes behov. Kravet på fortsatt fysisk närvaro, särskilt i områden med socioekonomiska utmaningar, ligger i linje med detta. Planen bygger dock på att insatser i stor utsträckning utförs av fristående aktörer, vilket gör stödet för mer myndighetsmakt svagt.
- close public servicedecisive»Offentlig service ska vara nära och pålitlig i hela landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Public service must be close and reliable throughout the country.”
- equal service nationwide»Alla invånare ska ha tillgång till en likvärdig och pålitlig välfärd oavsett var de bor, och den offentliga servicen ska finnas där när man behöver den.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“All residents shall have access to equal and reliable welfare regardless of where they live, and public service must be there when needed.”
- effective matching for all»Alla ska ha rätt till en effektiv matchningstjänst och det ska bli lättare att hitta medarbetare inom alla yrken.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Everyone shall have access to an effective matching service and it shall be easier to find staff in all professions.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan's decisive commitment is that the employment agency's authority task clearly be separated from the provider role and that private actors shall develop matching.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's decisive commitment is that the employment agency's authority task clearly be separated from the provider role and that private actors shall develop matching. To instead give the authority more discretion to itself choose and carry out initiatives goes against that arrangement. The plan requires however state presence in all parts of the country, which supports the counter-proposal's demand for local presence; the position is therefore uncertain.
Original (Swedish)
Planens avgörande åtagande är att arbetsförmedlingens myndighetsuppdrag tydligt ska skiljas från utförarrollen och att privata aktörer ska utveckla matchningen. Att i stället ge myndigheten mer handlingsfrihet att själv välja och utföra insatser går emot den ordningen. Planen kräver dock statlig närvaro i alla delar av landet, vilket stöder motförslagets krav på lokal närvaro; ställningstagandet är därför osäkert.
- authority task separated from executiondecisive»Arbetsförmedlingens myndighetsuppdrag ska tydligt skiljas från utförarrollen.« (party programme ↗)“The employment agency's authority task shall clearly be separated from the provider role.”
- private actors in matching»branschspecifika sådana, ska bidra till att utveckla matchningen på arbetsmarknaden.« (party programme ↗)“industry-specific ones, shall help develop matching on the labor market.”
- state presence throughout the country»Vägnätet ska fungera och statliga myndigheter ska finnas närvarande i alla delar av Sverige.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The road network shall function and state authorities shall be present throughout Sweden.”
- better support with clear demands»Arbetsförmedlingen, Försäkringskassan och socialtjänsten ska bli bättre i sitt stöd men också tydligare i förväntningen på att alla som kan ska försörja sig själva.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Employment Agency, the Social Insurance Agency, and social services shall become better in their support but also clearer in the expectation that all who can shall support themselves.”
flags: motstridiga_atagande
The plan's decisive commitment is that there should be a plurality of actors acting as employment brokers and that labour market policy should be based on the principle of subsidiarity with supporting measures.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's decisive commitment is that there should be a plurality of actors acting as employment brokers and that labour market policy should be based on the principle of subsidiarity with supporting measures. To instead give the authority greater freedom of action to choose measures itself goes against that direction. The requirement for physical presence across the country, on the other hand, has support in the plan's commitment to state service and local presence.
Original (Swedish)
Planens avgörande åtagande är att det bör finnas en mångfald av aktörer som agerar arbetsförmedlare och att arbetsmarknadspolitiken ska utgå från subsidiaritetsprincipen med stödjande insatser. Att i stället ge myndigheten större handlingsfrihet att själv välja insatser går emot den inriktningen. Kravet på fysisk närvaro i hela landet har däremot stöd i planens åtagande om statlig service och lokal närvaro.
- plurality of employment brokersdecisive»bör finnas en mångfald av aktörer som agerar arbetsförmedlare« (party programme ↗)“there should be a plurality of actors acting as employment brokers”
- subsidiarity in labour market policy»Arbetsmarknadspolitiken måste också utgå från« (party programme ↗)“Labour market policy must also be based on”
- supporting measures»stödjande när så krävs, dock utan att skada ordinarie« (party programme ↗)“supporting when necessary, but without damaging regular”
- state presence across the country»inrätta fler statliga servicekontor« (2022 manifesto ↗)“establish more state service offices”
The plan chooses the market and independent actors' path: a plurality of actors is a prerequisite for renewal, and the central employment instrument is significantly reduced hiring costs, not a larger government apparatus.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan chooses the market and independent actors' path: a plurality of actors is a prerequisite for renewal, and the central employment instrument is significantly reduced hiring costs, not a larger government apparatus. The counter-proposal instead wants to give the authority more discretion and expand its physical presence across the country, while the plan says that state spending shall decrease and that a large state produces a weaker society.
Original (Swedish)
Planen väljer marknadens och de fristående aktörernas väg: en mångfald av aktörer är en förutsättning för förnyelse, och det centrala jobbinstrumentet är kraftigt sänkta anställningskostnader, inte en större myndighetsapparat. Motförslaget vill i stället ge myndigheten mer handlingsfrihet och bygga ut dess fysiska närvaro i hela landet, medan planen säger att statens utgifter ska minska och att en stor stat ger ett svagare samhälle.
- plurality of actorsdecisive»En mångfald av aktörer är också en förutsättning för förnyelse och innovation.« (party programme ↗)“A plurality of actors is also a prerequisite for renewal and innovation.”
- cheaper to hire»Kraftigt sänka kostnaden för att anställa långtidsarbetslösa« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Significantly reduce the cost of hiring the long-term unemployed”
- decreased state spending»Statens utgifter ska minska – vi ska stoppa slöseriet med skattepengar« (2022 manifesto ↗)“State spending shall decrease – we shall stop wasting tax money”
- limited state»En stor stat leder till ett svagare samhälle.« (party programme ↗)“A large state leads to a weaker society.”
The plan condemns the employment policy within the Public Employment Service as an integration activity with very weak results relative to costs and wants to scrap ineffective programmes.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan condemns the employment policy within the Public Employment Service as an integration activity with very weak results relative to costs and wants to scrap ineffective programmes. Giving the authority greater discretion and a continued mandate to strengthen presence in socioeconomically disadvantaged areas builds on precisely this activity. The plan instead wants the measures to be streamlined so they lead to real jobs and that priority for newly arrived migrants ceases.
Original (Swedish)
Planen dömer ut arbetsmarknadspolitiken inom Arbetsförmedlingen som en integrationsverksamhet med mycket svagt utfall i förhållande till kostnaderna och vill avskaffa ineffektiva program. Att ge myndigheten större handlingsfrihet och ett fortsatt uppdrag att stärka närvaron i socioekonomiskt utsatta områden bygger vidare på just den verksamheten. Planen vill i stället att åtgärderna renodlas så att de leder till riktiga jobb och att förtur för nyanlända upphör.
- criticism of the Public Employment Servicedecisive»Tyvärr har arbetsmarknadspolitiken som bedrivs inom ramen för Arbetsförmedlingen och kommunerna i allt högre grad kommit att bli en integrationsverksamhet med mycket svagt utfall i förhållande till kostnaderna.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Unfortunately, the employment policy conducted within the framework of the Public Employment Service and the municipalities has increasingly become an integration activity with very weak results relative to its costs.”
- scrap ineffective programmes»Avskaffa ineffektiva arbetsmarknads- och integrationsprogram som är skapade för att dölja arbetslöshet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Scrap ineffective employment and integration programmes created to hide unemployment”
- no priority for newly arrived migrants»Stoppa den positiva särbehandlingen av nyanlända vad gäller jobb och lägenheter« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Stop positive discrimination of newly arrived migrants regarding jobs and apartments”
- measures shall yield real jobs»Sverigedemokraterna vill anpassa arbetsmarknadsåtgärderna så att de på ett effektivt sätt ska leda till riktiga jobb.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden Democrats want to adjust employment measures so that they effectively lead to real jobs.”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2022/23:AU9)
- Committee report full text (HA01AU9)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2022/23:1197 — En aktiv arbetsmarknadspolitik i hela landet av Peter Hedberg och Peder Björk (båda S)
- Motion 2022/23:1228 — En fungerande sjukförsäkring av Ida Gabrielsson m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2022/23:1231 — Ett hållbart småföretagande av Lorena Delgado Varas m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2022/23:1245 — Ordning och reda på arbetsmarknaden av Ciczie Weidby m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2022/23:1356 — En stark arbetslöshetsförsäkring av Kristoffer Lindberg m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2022/23:1362 — Arbetsmarknadspolitiska insatser i form av utbildningar av Mikael Dahlqvist m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2022/23:1379 — En offensiv storstadspolitik av Joakim Sandell (S)
- Motion 2022/23:1479 — Grundkrav på kollektivavtal av Annette Rydell och Heléne Björklund (båda S)
- Motion 2022/23:1534 — Självförsörjningsmål av Hans Eklind och Yusuf Aydin (båda KD)
- Motion 2022/23:1550 — Trygghet för företagare av Mathias Tegnér och Jennie Nilsson (båda S)
- Motion 2022/23:1560 — Arbetsmarknad som fungerar för alla människor i Sverige av Denis Begic (S)
- Motion 2022/23:1672 — En levande landsbygd för Sveriges bästa av Annie Lööf m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2022/23:1711 — Fackligt samråd vid arbetsmarknadspolitiska insatser av Johan Andersson m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2022/23:1805 — Utbildning för taxiförarlegitimation av Magnus Jacobsson (KD)
- Motion 2022/23:1988 — Kompetensförsörjning för grön omställning av Isak From m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2022/23:2019 — Behovet av insatser för att stärka arbetsmarknaden av Dzenan Cisija m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2022/23:202 — Proportionalitet gällande återbetalning av lönebidrag av Helena Lindahl (C)
- Motion 2022/23:2032 — Arbetsförmedlingen ska finnas i hela landet av Heléne Björklund m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2022/23:2052 — Utgiftsområde 14 Arbetsmarknad och arbetsliv av Teresa Carvalho m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2022/23:2062 — En politik för ekonomisk resiliens och stärkt konkurrenskraft av Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S)
Source: The Swedish Parliament