2026-06-092025/26:FiU20 · p.2FiUEconomy & finance
Report by the Swedish National Audit Office on the application of the fiscal framework 2025
The National Audit Office's report on application of the fiscal policy framework
What's at stake: The National Audit Office's review concerns how well government budget policy follows the framework meant to secure sound public finances; the outcome affects trust in economic policy and the room for manoeuvre of future governments.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the government's report responding to the National Audit Office's review of the fiscal framework can simply be filed without further action, or whether the review's criticism of insufficient compliance and transparency in budget policy requires a change of course.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The Committee proposes that the motion be rejected and that the report responding to the National Audit Office's review be filed, without further action being considered necessary.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 5 (C)
C believes the National Audit Office's report shows that government policy is neither designed in accordance with the fiscal framework nor transparently reported, that the budget rests on overly optimistic forecasts and an inadequate plan for returning to the surplus target, and that the government does not listen to its expert authorities; an immediate return to the framework's principles is required.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: closing the file on the government's report (no further action) and rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 5 by C.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have gone the other way
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: SSocialdemokraterna, SDSverigedemokraterna
Ja 302–24Nej 128–198
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Abstain 3/0/17/1 | differs | confidence: low | not addressed |
| S | No | Yes 106/0/0/0 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| MP | No | Yes 18/0/0/0 | differs | confidence: low | not addressed |
| C | No | No 0/24/0/0 | match | confidence: medium | explicit |
| L | No | Yes 16/0/0/0 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| KD | No | Yes 19/0/0/0 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| M | No | Yes 66/0/0/0 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| SD | No | Yes 68/0/0/2 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: medium | explicit |
Broke with the party line
| VCiczie Weidby (V, Jönköpings län) | Yes — party line: Abstain |
| VHåkan Svenneling (V, Värmlands län) | Yes — party line: Abstain |
| VLotta Johnsson Fornarve (V, Södermanlands län) | Yes — party line: Abstain |
MPs whose vote differs from their party's majority position in this division. Marked with a dark ring in the chamber view.
Committee proposal
Parliament rejects motion 2025/26:4109 by Martin Ådahl (C) and files document 2025/26:241.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motion 2025/26:4109 av Martin Ådahl (C) och lägger skrivelse 2025/26:241 till handlingarna.
Riksdag decision: Parliament approved the government's proposal for guidelines on economic policy and budget policy in the spring budget bill. Uncertainty and unpredictability regarding geopolitical and trade policy developments have led the government to revise forecasts for, among other things, GDP and unemployment compared to the spring budget bill. As a result, recovery in the Swedish economy is expected to continue at a slower pace than what was assessed in the spring budget bill. Parliament agrees with the government that sustainable economic recovery must be ensured and that Sweden should continue to be built stronger to become more competitive and resilient. Parliament also shares the government's assessment that economic policy should focus on three areas: continuing to safeguard public finances, enabling more jobs in Sweden, and ensuring that effort is rewarded. Parliament also decided to file the government's document in response to the Swedish National Audit Office's review report on the application of the fiscal framework 2025, that is, to close the matter. Parliament also rejected proposals in motions, of which twelve proposals are from the general motion period 2025/2026.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to lower labor market thresholds and accelerate transition through tax reductions and investments. (C) — Reservation 5
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan does not take a position on the fiscal framework.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan does not take a position on the fiscal framework. The closest principle is that the government shall be responsible to the Riksdag and that economic policy shall be reported openly and be open to scrutiny, which speaks for the counter-proposal's demand for transparency and that criticism from expert authorities be taken seriously. At the same time, the plan wants to see large public investments financed with raised taxes on the wealthy, which makes support for a strict return to the framework uncertain.
Original (Swedish)
Planen tar inte ställning till det finanspolitiska ramverket. Närmast liggande princip är att regeringen ska vara ansvarig inför riksdagen och att den ekonomiska politiken ska redovisas öppet och kunna granskas, vilket talar för motförslagets krav på transparens och att expertmyndigheters kritik tas på allvar. Samtidigt vill planen se stora offentliga investeringar finansierade med höjda skatter på förmögna, vilket gör stödet för en strikt återgång till ramverket osäkert.
- accountability to the Riksdagdecisive»Regeringen ska vara ansvarig inför riksdagen.« (party programme ↗)“The government shall be responsible to the Riksdag.”
- needs-based tax policy»Vänsterpartiet har en skattepolitik som ser till vilka behov som finns och där de med stora kapitaltillgångar eller höga löner får bidra mer till välfärden än de gör idag.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Left Party has a tax policy that looks to what needs exist and where those with large capital holdings or high incomes contribute more to welfare than they do today.”
- criticism of fiscal policy pursued»De massiva skattesänkningar som genomförts av högerpartier och socialdemokrater under många år har resulterat i att det nu finns 350 miljarder mindre per år till välfärden än 1990.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The massive tax cuts implemented by right-wing parties and social democrats over many years have resulted in there now being 350 billion less per year for welfare than in 1990.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan explicitly stands up for the fiscal policy framework and for sound and well-managed public finances, and makes credibility of the Swedish economy an own commitment.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan explicitly stands up for the fiscal policy framework and for sound and well-managed public finances, and makes credibility of the Swedish economy an own commitment. The demand for an immediate return to the framework's principles and transparent accounting thus follows directly from the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planen står uttryckligen upp för det finanspolitiska ramverket och för sunda och välskötta offentliga finanser, och gör trovärdigheten för svensk ekonomi till ett eget åtagande. Kravet på en omedelbar återgång till ramverkets principer och transparent redovisning följer därför direkt av planen.
- fiscal policy frameworkdecisive»Vi står upp för det finanspolitiska ramverket och vill utveckla det för att möta vår tids samhällsproblem.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We stand up for the fiscal policy framework and want to develop it to meet our time's social problems.”
- sound public finances»Starkt finanspolitiskt ramverk, för sunda och välskötta offentliga finanser« (party programme ↗)“Strong fiscal policy framework, for sound and well-managed public finances”
- credible economic policy»Garantera trovärdigheten för svensk ekonomi.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Guarantee the credibility of the Swedish economy.”
- responsibility for public finances»Socialdemokraterna kommer aldrig att medverka till att underminera Sveriges ekonomi.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Social democrats will never participate in undermining Sweden's economy.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan requires long-term sustainable public finances and justice between generations, and values the ability to scrutinise power critically.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires long-term sustainable public finances and justice between generations, and values the ability to scrutinise power critically. The counter-proposal's requirement for transparent accounting and a return to the framework's principles follow from those principles. The plan, however, wants to be able to loan-finance large green investments, which makes the conclusion less clear-cut.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver långsiktigt hållbara offentliga finanser och rättvisa mellan generationer, och värnar att makten kan granskas kritiskt. Motförslagets krav på transparent redovisning och en återgång till ramverkets principer följer av de principerna. Planen vill samtidigt kunna lånefinansiera stora gröna investeringar, vilket gör slutsatsen mindre entydig.
- sustainable public financesdecisive»Den ska också säkerställa långsiktigt hållbara offentliga finanser, trygga välfärden och bidra till regional utveckling så att hela Sverige kan växa och må bra.« (party programme ↗)“It shall also ensure long-term sustainable public finances, secure welfare and contribute to regional development so that all of Sweden can grow and do well.”
- justice between generations»Den ekonomiska politiken ska driva på den hållbara omställningen och bidra till ökad jämlikhet samt rättvisa mellan generationer.« (party programme ↗)“Economic policy shall drive the sustainable transition and contribute to increased equality and justice between generations.”
- scrutiny of power»Att människor och institutioner ges möjlighet att kritiskt granska makten värnas av Miljöpartiet.« (party programme ↗)“That people and institutions are given the opportunity to scrutinise power critically is valued by the Greens.”
- loan-financed green investments»Stora investeringar i omställningen som gynnar framtida generationer ska kunna lånefinansieras.« (party programme ↗)“Large investments in the transition that benefit future generations shall be able to be loan-financed.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto makes the fiscal framework an explicit commitment: it shall be protected and strengthened and the order in the economy defended.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto makes the fiscal framework an explicit commitment: it shall be protected and strengthened and the order in the economy defended. The counter-proposal's requirement for immediate return to the framework's principles is therefore exactly what the plan prescribes. The plan moreover emphasises increased transparency and economy with tax money, which supports criticism of inadequate reporting and overly optimistic forecasts.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet gör det finanspolitiska ramverket till ett uttryckligt åtagande: det ska värnas och förstärkas och ordning och reda i ekonomin försvaras. Motförslagets krav på en omedelbar återgång till ramverkets principer är därmed just vad planen föreskriver. Planen betonar dessutom ökad transparens och sparsamhet med skattemedel, vilket ger stöd åt kritiken mot bristande redovisning och alltför optimistiska prognoser.
- protect fiscal frameworkdecisive»Det finanspolitiska ramverket ska värnas och förstärkas, och Sveriges långsiktiga ekonomiska stabilitet ska försvaras.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The fiscal framework shall be protected and strengthened, and Sweden's long-term economic stability shall be defended.”
- order and discipline in the economy»Ett ansvarsfullt ledarskap som stärker Sveriges ekonomi långsiktigt och försvarar ordning och reda i ekonomin och det finanspolitiska ramverket.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“A responsible leadership that strengthens Sweden's economy in the long term and defends order and discipline in the economy and the fiscal framework.”
- increased transparency»Sverige ska bli ännu mer transparent.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden shall become even more transparent.”
- economy with tax money»Beskattning begränsar dock människors självbestämmande, därför bör skattemedel användas sparsamt« (party programme ↗)“Taxation however limits people's self-determination, therefore tax money should be used economically”
The plan binds the party to stable public finances and that predictability in the state's actions strengthens the individual's security.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan binds the party to stable public finances and that predictability in the state's actions strengthens the individual's security. The counter-proposal's demands in substance – that policy shall be designed according to the financial policy framework and reported transparently – follow directly from that commitment, strengthened by the plan's view of transparency and scrutiny as a prerequisite for democracy. The plan does, however, not comment on how a scrutiny report shall be treated in the Riksdag.
Original (Swedish)
Planen binder partiet vid stabila offentliga finanser och vid att förutsägbarhet i statens agerande stärker den enskildes trygghet. Motförslagets krav i sak – att politiken ska utformas enligt det finanspolitiska ramverket och redovisas transparent – följer direkt av det åtagandet, förstärkt av planens syn på offentlighet och granskning som demokratins förutsättning. Planen uttalar sig däremot inte om hur en granskningsrapport ska behandlas i riksdagen.
- stable public financesdecisive»Stabila offentliga finanser och låg statsskuld skapar utrymme för Sverige att möta kriser utan att välfärden hotas.« (party programme ↗)“Stable public finances and low state debt create room for Sweden to meet crises without welfare being threatened.”
- predictable state policy»När förutsägbarheten i statens agerande ökar stärks också den enskildes trygghet.« (party programme ↗)“When predictability in the state's actions increases, the individual's security is also strengthened.”
- transparency and scrutiny»Offentlighetsprincipen har en grundläggande betydelse för att förankra och fördjupa folkstyret, och är en förutsättning för granskning och debatt.« (party programme ↗)“The principle of transparency is of fundamental importance for anchoring and deepening democracy, and is a prerequisite for scrutiny and debate.”
- fully financed reforms»Reformen ska vara fullt finansierad och tydligt sänka skatten på jobb och företagande.« (party programme ↗)“The reform shall be fully financed and clearly lower tax on jobs and business.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan binds the party to responsibly managing public finances and stewardship where each decision is tested against its long-term consequences.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan binds the party to responsibly managing public finances and stewardship where each decision is tested against its long-term consequences. The counter-proposal's demands for immediate return to the framework's principles and transparent reporting follow from that line. The programme additionally requires independent audit as a means against abuse of power, which speaks for a scrutiny authority's criticism to be taken seriously.
Original (Swedish)
Planen binder partiet vid ansvarsfullt skötta offentliga finanser och ett förvaltarskap där varje beslut prövas mot sina långsiktiga konsekvenser. Motförslagets krav på omedelbar återgång till ramverkets principer och transparent redovisning följer av den linjen. Programmet kräver dessutom oberoende revision som medel mot maktmissbruk, vilket talar för att en granskningsmyndighets kritik ska tas på allvar.
- responsibly managed public financesdecisive»ren miljö, ansvarsfullt skötta offentliga finanser och ett robust försäkringssystem måste« (party programme ↗)“clean environment, responsibly managed public finances and a robust insurance system must”
- restraint in spending»återhållsamhet i de offentliga utgifterna.« (party programme ↗)“restraint in public spending.”
- independent control of power»Det måste finnas effektiva medel mot maktmissbruk och maktkoncentration. En obunden« (party programme ↗)“There must be effective means against abuse of power and concentration of power. An independent”
- stewardship and long-termism»Alla politiska beslut bör fattas i enlighet med förvaltarskapsprincipen, vilket innebär att« (party programme ↗)“All political decisions should be made in accordance with the stewardship principle, which means that”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan states that the surplus target shall be safeguarded, that a balance target is not current and that all new reforms must be financed or fit within the target.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan states that the surplus target shall be safeguarded, that a balance target is not current and that all new reforms must be financed or fit within the target. The counter-proposal's requirements for an immediate return to the financial policy framework's principles and for transparent reporting follow directly from these commitments. The plan also requires strong public finances and that public waste be combated.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att överskottsmålet ska värnas, att ett balansmål inte är aktuellt och att alla nya reformer måste finansieras eller rymmas inom målet. Motförslagets krav på en omedelbar återgång till det finanspolitiska ramverkets principer och på transparent redovisning följer direkt av dessa åtaganden. Planen kräver dessutom starka statsfinanser och att offentligt slöseri bekämpas.
- the surplus target shall be safeguardeddecisive»Överskottsmålet ska värnas och det är inte aktuellt att övergå till ett balansmål.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The surplus target shall be safeguarded and it is not current to move to a balance target.”
- financed reforms»Alla nya löften och reformer – som till exempel våra inkomstskattesänkningar – behöver finansieras eller rymmas inom överskottsmålet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“All new commitments and reforms – such as for example our income tax cuts – need to be financed or fit within the surplus target.”
- strong public finances»Statens finanser ska vara starka.« (party programme ↗)“State finances shall be strong.”
- respect for taxpayers' money»Offentligt slöseri i alla former ska bekämpas.« (party programme ↗)“Public waste in all forms shall be combated.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan establishes that sound public finances and respect for the fiscal policy framework are a fundamental prerequisite for welfare.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that sound public finances and respect for the fiscal policy framework are a fundamental prerequisite for welfare. The counter-proposal's demand for an immediate return to the framework's principles, following an independent review showing deviations and lack of transparency, is a direct application of that commitment. The plan furthermore requires accountability when the management of public resources falls short.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att sunda statsfinanser och respekt för det finanspolitiska ramverket är en grundförutsättning för välfärden. Motförslagets krav på en omedelbar återgång till ramverkets principer, efter en oberoende granskning som visar avsteg och bristande transparens, är en direkt tillämpning av det åtagandet. Planen kräver dessutom ansvarsutkrävande när hanteringen av offentliga resurser brister.
- respect for the fiscal policy frameworkdecisive»Sunda statsfinanser och respekt för det finanspolitiska ramverket är grundförutsättningar för att långsiktigt kunna bevara en hög nivå av välfärd.« (party programme ↗)“Sound public finances and respect for the fiscal policy framework are fundamental prerequisites for being able to long-term maintain a high level of welfare.”
- stewardship of shared resources»Ett varsamt hanterande av de gemensamma ekonomiska resurserna är en viktig och naturlig del av den sverigedemokratiska förvaltarskapstanken.« (party programme ↗)“Careful management of our shared economic resources is an important and natural part of the Sweden Democrats' stewardship thinking.”
- accountability»Sverigedemokraterna vill stärka möjligheter för ansvarsutkrävande när hanteringen av de offentliga resurserna brister.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Sweden Democrats want to strengthen opportunities for accountability when the management of public resources falls short.”
- results requirement»Begära tydliga resultat för varje offentlig satsning« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Demand clear results for every public investment”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2025/26:FiU20)
- Committee report full text (HD01FiU20)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2025/26:1048 — Ekonomi för ett jämlikt och hållbart samhälle av Jamal El-Haj (-)
- Motion 2025/26:1146 — Utredning av möjligheten att införa euron som svensk valuta av Anders Karlsson (C)
- Motion 2025/26:2493 — Tillväxtmål av Jesper Skalberg Karlsson (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2496 — Utökad budgetgranskning av Jesper Skalberg Karlsson (M)
- Motion 2025/26:3150 — Eurooption och färdplan inför 2029 av Malin Danielsson m.fl. (L)
- Motion 2025/26:3421 — Klimatanpassning av Sverige 2026 av Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2025/26:3422 — En grön klimathandlingsplan 2026 av Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2025/26:4101 — med anledning av prop. 2025/26:100 2026 års ekonomiska vårproposition av Magdalena Andersson m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:4108 — med anledning av prop. 2025/26:100 2026 års ekonomiska vårproposition av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2025/26:4109 — med anledning av skr. 2025/26:241 Riksrevisionens rapport om tillämpningen av det finanspolitiska ramverket 2025 av Martin Ådahl (C)
- Motion 2025/26:4110 — med anledning av prop. 2025/26:100 2026 års ekonomiska vårproposition av Martin Ådahl m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2025/26:4118 — med anledning av prop. 2025/26:100 2026 års ekonomiska vårproposition av Daniel Helldén m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2025/26:617 — Finanspolitiskt ramverk för klimatomställningen av Markus Kallifatides (S)
- Proposition 2025/26:100 — 2026 års ekonomiska vårproposition
- Regeringens skrivelse 2025/26:241 — Riksrevisionens rapport om tillämpningen av det finanspolitiska ramverket 2025
Source: The Swedish Parliament