2026-02-042025/26:AU8 · p.1AULabour market

Settlement of newcomers

Design of the Settlement Act for newly arrived immigrants

What's at stake: How the reception of newly arrived immigrants is distributed between municipalities affects both how quickly they can establish themselves and how great the burden becomes on individual municipalities. The decision involves weighing municipalities' own circumstances against the need to spread reception evenly across the country.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

The question is how the Settlement Act should be designed going forward: whether municipalities should get greater influence and more flexibility over the reception of newly arrived immigrants, or whether the current arrangement of an even, mandatory distribution of reception across all municipalities should be preserved unchanged.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The committee rejects the motions. The reason is that the committee welcomes the upcoming review of the Settlement Act, which is intended to give municipalities greater influence and more flexibility over reception, and judges this direction to be sufficient without parliament needing to make an additional statement.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 1 (S)

The reservation (S) calls for the government to safeguard the Settlement Act's intentions that reception should be distributed evenly among all municipalities and that all municipalities take their share of responsibility. The reasoning is that a review has shown the law has already achieved its aims of faster, more even distribution of reception and better establishment, and that any new regulation may take account of municipalities that have carried a disproportionately large share of responsibility, but only through strictly objective criteria - not by letting some municipalities stop taking their share of responsibility, which would risk an uneven distribution and worse conditions for establishment.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 1 by S.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
VNoYes 19/0/0/3departs from the planconfidence: mediumderived
Sown reservationNoNo 0/91/0/15follows the planconfidence: highexplicit
MPNoYes 12/0/0/6departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
CYesAbstain 0/0/21/3departs from the planconfidence: lowderived
LNoYes 14/0/0/2departs from the planconfidence: mediumderived
KDYesYes 14/0/0/5follows the planconfidence: lowderived
MYesYes 58/0/0/10follows the planconfidence: lownot addressed
SDYesYes 62/0/0/9follows the planconfidence: mediumderived

Committee proposal

Parliament rejects the motions 2025/26:1282 by Josefin Malmqvist (M), 2025/26:3190 by Jonny Cato et al. (C) demand 28, 2025/26:3587 by Ida Karkiainen et al. (S) demand 7 and 2025/26:3592 by Ardalan Shekarabi et al. (S) demand 2.

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2025/26:1282 av Josefin Malmqvist (M), 2025/26:3190 av Jonny Cato m.fl. (C) yrkande 28, 2025/26:3587 av Ida Karkiainen m.fl. (S) yrkande 7 och 2025/26:3592 av Ardalan Shekarabi m.fl. (S) yrkande 2.

Riksdag decision: Parliament said no to 49 proposals on integration in motions from the general motion period in 2025. The proposals deal with, among other things, settlement of newcomers, establishment measures and parallel social structures. Parliament refers mainly to work already underway in the areas addressed by the proposals.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The plan demands that incomes and costs be distributed solidaristically throughout the country and that school, healthcare and care work everywhere, which speaks for reception being distributed evenly between all municipalities rather than some being able to opt out.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan demands that incomes and costs be distributed solidaristically throughout the country and that school, healthcare and care work everywhere, which speaks for reception being distributed evenly between all municipalities rather than some being able to opt out. Breaking segregation is a stated goal, and uneven distribution works against it. The plan also emphasises that a secure and permanent existence is what makes people take root.

Original (Swedish)

Planen kräver att inkomster och kostnader fördelas solidariskt över landet och att skola, vård och omsorg fungerar överallt, vilket talar för att mottagandet fördelas jämnt mellan alla kommuner snarare än att vissa kan avstå. Att bryta segregationen är ett uttalat mål, och en ojämn fördelning motverkar det. Planen betonar också att en trygg och permanent tillvaro är det som gör att människor rotar sig.

  • solidaristic distribution throughout the countrydecisive»Inkomster och kostnader behöver fördelas solidariskt över landet.« (party programme ↗)“Incomes and costs need to be distributed solidaristically throughout the country.”
  • break segregation»Vi vill bryta upp segregationen och skapa en blandning av hustyper och« (party programme ↗)“We want to break up segregation and create a mix of housing types and”
  • welfare throughout the country»Skola, vård, omsorg och annan service behöver fungera överallt.« (party programme ↗)“School, healthcare, care and other services need to work everywhere.”
  • secure establishment»det är genom en trygg och permanent tillvaro i samhället som vi människor rotar oss.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“it is through a secure and permanent existence in society that we human beings take root.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

SSocialdemokraternaNoNofollows the planexplicit

The plan requires even distribution of newly arrived people across the country through all municipalities taking responsibility, and explicitly establishes that even affluent municipalities should take their share.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan requires even distribution of newly arrived people across the country through all municipalities taking responsibility, and explicitly establishes that even affluent municipalities should take their share. The counter-proposal's requirement that the intentions of settlement rules be protected and that exemptions may only be based on strictly objective criteria is the same line. The plan also wants increased state control of reception, not greater opportunities for individual municipalities to opt out.

Original (Swedish)

Planen kräver en jämn fördelning av nyanlända över landet genom att alla kommuner tar ansvar, och slår uttryckligen fast att även välbeställda kommuner ska ta sin del. Motförslagets krav på att bosättningsreglernas intentioner värnas och att lättnader bara får bygga på strikt objektiva kriterier är samma linje. Planen vill dessutom ha ökad statlig styrning av mottagandet, inte större möjligheter för enskilda kommuner att avstå.

  • even distribution among municipalitiesdecisive»Jämn fördelning av nyanlända över landet genom att alla kommuner tar ansvar.« (party programme ↗)“Even distribution of newly arrived people across the country through all municipalities taking responsibility.”
  • all municipalities take responsibility»Alla kommuner, även de välbeställda, ska ta sin del av ansvaret.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“All municipalities, even affluent ones, should take their share of responsibility.”
  • state control of reception»Ordning och reda i flyktingmottagandet, genom ökad statlig kontroll, styrning och« (party programme ↗)“Order and discipline in refugee reception, through increased state control, management and”
  • counteracted segregation»Samhällsplanering som i alla delar motverkar segregation, särskilt på bostadsområdet.« (party programme ↗)“Societal planning that in all respects counteracts segregation, particularly in housing.”
MPMiljöpartietNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan establishes that segregation reinforces inequality, that it is the result of political mispriorities and can be broken with justice-oriented politics.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan establishes that segregation reinforces inequality, that it is the result of political mispriorities and can be broken with justice-oriented politics. Reception distributed evenly among all municipalities counteracts precisely the concentration of vulnerability that the plan opposes, and strengthens integration. The plan therefore supports the counter-proposal's requirement that the intentions of settlement rules are protected.

Original (Swedish)

Planen slår fast att segregationen förstärker ojämlikheten, att den är resultatet av politiska felprioriteringar och kan brytas med politik för rättvisa. Ett mottagande som fördelas jämnt mellan alla kommuner motverkar just den koncentration av utsatthet som planen vänder sig mot, och stärker etableringen. Planen stöder därför motförslagets krav på att bosättningsreglernas intentioner värnas.

  • segregation increases inequalitydecisive»Segregationen i vårt samhälle förstärker ojämlikheten och minskar människors möjligheter att påverka sina liv.« (party programme ↗)“Segregation in our society reinforces inequality and reduces people's opportunities to influence their lives.”
  • segregation can be broken politically»Segregationen är resultatet av politiska felprioriteringar och kan brytas med politik för rättvisa.« (party programme ↗)“Segregation is the result of political mispriorities and can be broken with justice-oriented politics.”
  • strengthened integration»förlänga etableringsprogrammet för nyanlända till minst fyra år för att skapa bättre förutsättningar för etablering, så att fler kommer i arbete snabbare.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“extend the integration programme for newcomers to at least four years to create better conditions for integration, so that more people get into work faster.”
  • inclusive reception»Människor som kommer till Sverige ska mötas med öppenhet, inkludering och samhällsintroduktion för att snabbt bli en del av samhällslivet.« (party programme ↗)“People coming to Sweden should be met with openness, inclusion and social orientation to quickly become part of society.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

CCenterpartietYesAbstaindeparts from the planderived

The party programme establishes that municipalities must get greater opportunities to take responsibility for the challenges on the labour and housing markets, and the election manifesto wants to decentralise more so that decisions are made close to those affected.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The party programme establishes that municipalities must get greater opportunities to take responsibility for the challenges on the labour and housing markets, and the election manifesto wants to decentralise more so that decisions are made close to those affected. The counter-proposal instead wants to lock in today's state-controlled distribution of reception. The plan recognises segregation as a main problem, but the specified path is increased municipal influence, not preserved central control.

Original (Swedish)

Partiprogrammet slår fast att kommunerna måste få större möjligheter att ta ansvar för utmaningarna på arbets- och bostadsmarknaden, och valmanifestet vill decentralisera mera så att besluten fattas nära dem som berörs. Motförslaget vill i stället låsa fast dagens statligt styrda fördelning av mottagandet. Planen erkänner segregationen som ett huvudproblem, men den anvisade vägen är ökat kommunalt inflytande, inte bevarad central styrning.

  • greater municipal responsibilitydecisive»Kommunerna måste få större möjligheter att ta ansvar för dessa utmaningar.« (party programme ↗)“Municipalities must get greater opportunities to take responsibility for these challenges.”
  • decentralisation»Decentralisera mera. Människor ska få bestämma mer själva, och politiska beslut ska fattas nära dem som berörs.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Decentralise more. People shall get to decide more themselves, and political decisions shall be made close to those affected.”
  • the proximity principle»beslut i första hand ska fattas av människor själva, eller så nära den enskilda människan som möjligt« (party programme ↗)“decisions should primarily be made by people themselves, or as close to the individual person as possible”
  • break segregation»Sverige är segregerat mellan dem med och utan jobb, mellan de som är födda här och i andra länder, mellan dem med och utan utbildning.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden is segregated between those with and without jobs, between those born here and in other countries, between those with and without education.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

LLiberalernaNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The plan establishes that all councils shall be able to receive newly arrived people and that integration policy shall be general and be based on laws and rules applied equally for all.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan establishes that all councils shall be able to receive newly arrived people and that integration policy shall be general and be based on laws and rules applied equally for all. This bears the counter-proposal's demands that even distribution of reception is protected and that any reliefs rest on strictly objective criteria. Simultaneously the plan emphasizes that newly arrived should have incentives to live where the labour market is good, which the counter-proposal does not contradict.

Original (Swedish)

Planen slår fast att alla kommuner ska kunna ta emot nyanlända och att integrationspolitiken ska vara generell och bygga på regler som tillämpas lika för alla. Det bär motförslagets krav på att ett jämnt fördelat mottagande värnas och att eventuella lättnader vilar på strikt objektiva kriterier. Samtidigt betonar planen att nyanlända bör ha drivkrafter att bo där arbetsmarknaden är god, vilket motförslaget inte motsäger.

  • all councils take their responsibilitydecisive»Alla kommuner ska kunna ta emot nyanlända.« (party programme ↗)“All councils shall be able to receive newly arrived people.”
  • general and equal rules»Huvudprincipen för integrationspolitiken är att den ska vara generell. Den ska bygga på lagar och regler som tillämpas lika för alla.« (party programme ↗)“The main principle for integration policy is that it shall be general. It shall be based on laws and rules applied equally for all.”
  • more evenly distributed reception»Ansvaret för flyktingmottagandet ska fördelas jämnare mellan länderna så att fler flyktingar ska få skydd.« (party programme ↗)“Responsibility for refugee reception shall be distributed more evenly between countries so that more refugees shall receive protection.”
  • settlement near labour market»Det är angeläget att nyanlända har förutsättningar och drivkrafter att bo i kommuner med god arbetsmarknad.« (party programme ↗)“It is important that newly arrived have conditions and incentives to live in councils with good labour market.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

KDKristdemokraternaYesYesfollows the planderived

The party programme makes municipal self-government strong and places the burden of proof on those who want to deprive a lower community of its freedom and responsibility.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The party programme makes municipal self-government strong and places the burden of proof on those who want to deprive a lower community of its freedom and responsibility. The counter-proposal wants instead to uphold a state regulatory framework that imposes on all municipalities a specific share of reception and limit reliefs for municipalities. The plan moreover holds fast that immigrants shall have the right to settle where they choose. The requirement is rejected.

Original (Swedish)

Partiprogrammet gör den kommunala självstyrelsen stark och lägger bevisbördan på den som vill beröva en lägre gemenskap dess frihet och ansvar. Motförslaget vill i stället slå vakt om ett statligt regelverk som ålägger alla kommuner en bestämd andel av mottagandet och begränsa lättnader för kommunerna. Planen håller dessutom fast vid att invandrare ska ha rätt att bosätta sig var de vill. Kravet avvisas.

  • strong municipal self-governmentdecisive»Den kommunala självstyrelsen ska vara stark och tydligt reglerad i grundlagen.« (party programme ↗)“Municipal self-government shall be strong and clearly regulated in the constitution.”
  • the subsidiarity principle»Denna princip innebär att bevisbördan vilar på dem som vill beröva en mindre gemenskap på lägre nivå dess funktion och därmed dess frihet och ansvar.« (party programme ↗)“This principle means that the burden of proof rests on those who want to deprive a smaller community at a lower level of its function and thus its freedom and responsibility.”
  • free right of settlement»Invandrare ska åtnjuta samma frihet som övriga medborgare och ha rätt att bosätta sig var de vill, att utöva sin religion, lära sina barn sitt modersmål och för övrigt få utöva sina mänskliga rättigheter.« (party programme ↗)“Immigrants shall enjoy the same freedom as other citizens and have the right to settle where they choose, exercise their religion, teach their children their mother tongue and otherwise exercise their human rights.”
  • the financing principle»Finansieringsprincipen måste respekteras när staten ålägger kommunerna nya uppgifter.« (party programme ↗)“The financing principle must be respected when the state imposes new tasks on municipalities.”
MModeraternaYesYesfollows the plannot addressed

The plan does not take a position on the settlement law's distribution mechanism, but builds on decisions being made at the lowest effective level and municipalities being able to choose different paths based on their conditions.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan does not take a position on the settlement law's distribution mechanism, but builds on decisions being made at the lowest effective level and municipalities being able to choose different paths based on their conditions. The counter-proposal's requirement that the state shall safeguard even distribution and limit easements for municipalities goes against that decentralization principle. The plan's migration line is also about reducing volumes and setting requirements on the individual, not about locking in distribution between municipalities.

Original (Swedish)

Planen tar inte ställning till bosättningslagens fördelningsmekanism, men bygger på att beslut ska fattas på lägsta effektiva nivå och att kommuner ska kunna välja olika vägar utifrån sina förutsättningar. Motförslagets krav på att staten ska värna en jämn fördelning och begränsa lättnader för kommunerna går emot den decentraliseringsprincipen. Planens migrationslinje handlar dessutom om att minska volymerna och ställa krav på den enskilde, inte om att låsa fast fördelningen mellan kommuner.

  • decisions at the lowest effective leveldecisive»Det politiska systemet ska bygga på att beslut fattas på lägsta« (party programme ↗)“The political system shall be built on decisions being made at the lowest”
  • integration capacity guides the level»Vår integrationsförmåga ska vara styrande för nivån på invandringen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Our integration capacity shall guide the level of immigration.”
  • volume target for asylum reception»Införa ett volymmål för asylmottagandet på nordiska nivåer« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Introduce a volume target for asylum reception at Nordic levels”
SDSverigedemokraternaYesYesfollows the planderived

The counter-proposal wants to protect a regulatory framework that forces all municipalities to receive newly arrived immigrants according to an even distribution.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The counter-proposal wants to protect a regulatory framework that forces all municipalities to receive newly arrived immigrants according to an even distribution. The plan's central commitment is instead to stop asylum immigration and to reduce migration's strain on the housing market through return migration, with a benchmark of net reduction. The plan also regards municipal self-determination as a central part of democracy. Therefore, the plan speaks against the counter-proposal's demands.

Original (Swedish)

Motförslaget vill värna ett regelverk som tvingar alla kommuner att ta emot nyanlända enligt en jämn fördelning. Planens bärande åtagande är i stället att asylinvandringen ska stoppas och att migrationens påfrestning på bostadsmarknaden ska minska genom återvandring, med ett riktmärke om nettominus. Planen betraktar dessutom det kommunala självbestämmandet som en central del av demokratin. Därför talar planen emot motförslagets krav.

  • stopped asylum immigrationdecisive»Stoppa asylinvandringen från länder som inte utgör vårt närområde« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Stop asylum immigration from countries that are not in our region”
  • net reduction in migration»Riktmärket under överskådlig tid ska vara att fler av de som befinner sig i Sverige illegalt eller saknar anknytning till det svenska samhället varje år återvänder, än de som beviljas asyl från utanför vårt närområde.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The benchmark over a foreseeable period should be that more of those who are in Sweden illegally or lack connection to Swedish society return each year than those who are granted asylum from outside our region.”
  • reduced strain on housing»Minska migrationens påfrestning på bostadsmarknaden genom återvandring« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Reduce migration's strain on the housing market through return migration”
  • municipal self-determination»Vi betraktar det kommunala självbestämmandet som en central del av demokratin« (party programme ↗)“We regard municipal self-determination as a central part of democracy”

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament