2024-03-202023/24:TU9 · p.10TUTransport & infrastructure
Review of the taxi industry
What's at stake: The taxi industry has been deregulated since 1990, and this affects taxi drivers, legitimate taxi companies, and passengers who depend on fair prices and conditions. A decision on a review could affect how digital platforms and pricing are regulated going forward.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the entire taxi industry's regulation should be reviewed and restructured, or whether current oversight and enforcement efforts are sufficient within the deregulated system.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The Committee rejects a broad review of the taxi industry, pointing to ongoing measures: increased police numbers and additional resources for the Transport Agency's oversight, recurring assessments of pricing, and an announced bill on stricter requirements for price information in taxi rides.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 9 (S)
(S) wants the entire taxi industry to be reviewed, arguing that the 1990 deregulation has gone too far and that digital platform services undercut prices and conditions by avoiding employer responsibility, harming drivers, legitimate companies and passengers.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 9 by S.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Yes 18/0/0/6 | departs from the plan | confidence: high | not addressed |
| S | No | No 0/91/0/15 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| MP | No | Yes 15/0/0/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| C | Yes | Yes 21/0/0/3 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| L | Yes | Yes 11/0/0/5 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| KD | Yes | Yes 15/0/0/4 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| M | Yes | Yes 58/0/0/10 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| SD | No | Abstain 0/0/62/10 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
Committee proposal
Parliament rejects the motions 2023/24:254 by Serkan Köse (S) petitions 1 and 5, 2023/24:414 by Thomas Morell et al. (SD) petitions 5 and 6, 2023/24:1177 by Linnéa Wickman and Jim Svensk Larm (both S) and 2023/24:2625 by Gunilla Svantorp et al. (S) petition 38.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2023/24:254 av Serkan Köse (S) yrkandena 1 och 5, 2023/24:414 av Thomas Morell m.fl. (SD) yrkandena 5 och 6, 2023/24:1177 av Linnéa Wickman och Jim Svensk Larm (båda S) och 2023/24:2625 av Gunilla Svantorp m.fl. (S) yrkande 38.
Riksdag decision: Parliament rejected approximately 40 proposals in motions about various professional transport and taxi issues from the general motion period 2023. The motions dealt with, among other things, supervision, control and review. Parliament refers, among other things, to planned or already taken measures. As well as ongoing investigation and preparation work.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to establish a professional traffic inspection service for increased oversight and fair competition in the taxi industry. (S) — Reservation 9
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan identifies gig work as a central source of insecurity and wants to take back socially important activity that has been privatized, while condemning that work buyers are disclaiming employment responsibility.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan identifies gig work as a central source of insecurity and wants to take back socially important activity that has been privatized, while condemning that work buyers are disclaiming employment responsibility. A broad review of a deregulated taxi sector where platform companies dump prices and conditions without employment responsibility thus directly follows from these commitments. The taxi sector is however not mentioned explicitly.
Original (Swedish)
Planen pekar ut gig-jobben som en central källa till otrygghet och vill ta tillbaka samhällsviktig verksamhet som privatiserats, samtidigt som den fördömer att arbetsköpare friskriver sig från arbetsgivaransvar. En bred översyn av en avreglerad taxibransch där plattformsföretag dumpar priser och villkor utan arbetsgivaransvar följer direkt av dessa åtaganden. Taxibranschen nämns dock inte uttryckligen.
- against the gig economy's insecuritydecisive»Otryggheten skapas genom tillfälliga anställningar, sms-jobb, gig-jobb, deltidsjobb och bemanningsjobb.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Insecurity is created through temporary employment, text-message jobs, gig work, part-time jobs and staffing jobs.”
- against deregulation»Det är hög tid att agera och ta tillbaka den samhällsviktiga verksamhet och infrastruktur som har privatiserats.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It is high time to act and take back the socially important activity and infrastructure that has been privatized.”
- against abdication of employer responsibility»Arbetsköpare friskriver sig från ansvar genom kedjor av kontrakt med underleverantörer.« (party programme ↗)“Work buyers disclaim responsibility through chains of contracts with subcontractors.”
- against price and condition dumping»Lönedumpning, ekonomisk brottslighet och utnyttjande är centrala hot idag.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Wage dumping, economic crime and exploitation are central threats today.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The counter-proposal wants to review a deregulated industry where platform companies dump prices and conditions by avoiding employer responsibility.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The counter-proposal wants to review a deregulated industry where platform companies dump prices and conditions by avoiding employer responsibility. The party programme requires strong labour law protection for employees and democratic counterweights that create stable rules for the market, and makes collective agreements a necessary precondition. A broad review of the taxi industry follows from these commitments.
Original (Swedish)
Motförslaget vill se över en avreglerad bransch där plattformsföretag dumpar priser och villkor genom att avstå arbetsgivaransvar. Partiprogrammet kräver stark arbetsrättslig lagstiftning som skydd för de anställda och demokratiska motvikter som skapar stabila spelregler för marknaden, och gör kollektivavtal till en nödvändig förutsättning. En bred översyn av taxibranschen följer av dessa åtaganden.
- labour law protectiondecisive»En stark arbetsrättslig lagstiftning behövs som skydd för de anställda.« (party programme ↗)“Strong labour law protection is needed as protection for employees.”
- democratic counterweights against the market»Det krävs demokratiska motvikter för att skapa de stabila spelregler som behövs för att marknaden ska fungera väl.« (party programme ↗)“Democratic counterweights are needed to create the stable rules needed for the market to function well.”
- collective agreements as basic norm»Kollektivavtal är en nödvändig förutsättning för legitimiteten i arbetslivets spelregler och för arbetsfreden.« (party programme ↗)“Collective agreements are a necessary precondition for the legitimacy of working life's rules and for labour peace.”
- no competition through worse conditions»Det ska aldrig löna sig att begå brott eller skaffa sig konkurrensfördelar genom att försumma de anställdas rätt till en trygg arbetsmiljö.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It shall never pay to commit crime or gain competitive advantages by neglecting employees' right to a safe working environment.”
The plan points out that part of the labor market where workers have weak attachment and few rights and establishes that their working conditions must be improved, which is the heart of the counter-proposal's criticism of platform companies that avoid employer responsibility.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan points out that part of the labor market where workers have weak attachment and few rights and establishes that their working conditions must be improved, which is the heart of the counter-proposal's criticism of platform companies that avoid employer responsibility. The plan also values the Swedish model with collective agreements and establishes that the state through legislation and oversight shall ensure that sound conditions prevail in the market. A broad review of the taxi industry is thereby in line with the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planen pekar ut den del av arbetsmarknaden där arbetstagare har svag anknytning och få rättigheter och slår fast att deras arbetsvillkor måste förbättras, vilket är kärnan i motförslagets kritik mot plattformsbolag som undviker arbetsgivaransvar. Planen värnar också den svenska modellen med kollektivavtal och slår fast att staten genom lagstiftning och övervakning ska se till att sunda villkor råder på marknaden. En bred översyn av taxibranschen ligger därmed i linje med planen.
- better conditions for precarious jobsdecisive»Deras arbetsvillkor måste« (party programme ↗)“Their working conditions must”
- the Swedish model and collective agreements»Vi värnar den svenska modellen där arbetsmarknadens parter gemensamt förhandlar fram vad som« (party programme ↗)“We value the Swedish model where labor market parties jointly negotiate what”
- the state ensures sound market conditions»Staten ska genom lagstiftning och övervakning se« (party programme ↗)“The state shall through legislation and oversight see”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The counter-proposal's starting point is that deregulation of taxis has gone too far and the industry should be reviewed in that direction.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The counter-proposal's starting point is that deregulation of taxis has gone too far and the industry should be reviewed in that direction. The plan, by contrast, is based on a well-functioning market economy free from planned-economy intervention, on competition as a driving force and on making it easy to start and run a business. The plan therefore speaks against the demand, although it shares the concern about unscrupulous actors.
Original (Swedish)
Motförslagets utgångspunkt är att avregleringen av taxi gått för långt och att branschen bör ses över i den riktningen. Planen bygger tvärtom på en välfungerande marknadsekonomi fri från planekonomiska pekpinnar, på konkurrens som drivkraft och på att det ska vara lätt att starta och driva företag. Planen talar därför emot kravet, även om den delar oron för oseriösa aktörer.
- competition as driving forcedecisive»Konkurrens är en viktig drivkraft för utvecklingen av marknadsekonomin.« (party programme ↗)“Competition is an important driving force for the development of the market economy.”
- easy to run a business»Det ska vara lätt att starta och driva företag; det ska löna sig att ta klivet och satsa.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It shall be easy to start and run a business; it shall pay to take the step and venture.”
- fewer regulations for business»Rensa upp i regelträsket för entreprenörer, stora som små.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Clear away the regulatory thicket for entrepreneurs, large and small.”
flags: citat_blockerat
The plan embraces the sharing economy and wants rules that ensure competition on equal terms even in the age of digitalization, and that the tax system is adapted to the growing sharing economy.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan embraces the sharing economy and wants rules that ensure competition on equal terms even in the age of digitalization, and that the tax system is adapted to the growing sharing economy. The counter-proposal's starting point that deregulation has gone too far is the opposite of the plan's line on reduced regulatory burden and expanded labour market. The plan therefore does not support a reconsideration of deregulation.
Original (Swedish)
Planen bejakar delningsekonomin och vill ha spelregler som säkerställer konkurrens på rättvisa villkor även i digitaliseringens tid, samt att skattesystemet anpassas till den växande delningsekonomin. Motförslagets utgångspunkt att avregleringen gått för långt är motsatsen till planens linje om minskad regelbörda och vidgad arbetsmarknad. Planen ger därför inte stöd för en omprövning av avregleringen.
- embrace the sharing economydecisive»säkerställer konkurrens på rättvisa villkor även i digitaliseringens och delningsekonomins« (party programme ↗)“ensures competition on equal terms even in the age of digitalization and sharing economy”
- adaptation to the sharing economy»En startup-kommission ska tillsättas och skattesystemet anpassas bättre till den växande delningsekonomin.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“A startup commission shall be appointed and the tax system adapted better to the growing sharing economy.”
- decreased regulatory burden»Regelbördan för små företag ska minska« (party programme ↗)“The regulatory burden for small businesses shall decrease”
- livelihood business widens the labour market»vidgar arbetsmarknaden och ökar människors frihet« (party programme ↗)“widens the labour market and increases people's freedom”
The plan establishes that traffic itself should be conducted in competition and that competition restrictions may only occur exceptionally.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that traffic itself should be conducted in competition and that competition restrictions may only occur exceptionally. A review that assumes deregulation of taxi has gone too far conflicts with this. The plan, however, wants to oppose unfair competition and requires well-developed consumer information, which partly addresses the counter-proposal's concerns.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att själva trafiken bör bedrivas i konkurrens och att konkurrensbegränsningar endast får förekomma undantagsvis. En översyn som utgår från att avregleringen av taxi gått för långt strider mot det. Planen vill däremot motverka illojal konkurrens och kräver väl utbyggd konsumentinformation, vilket delvis möter motförslagets oro.
- traffic is conducted in competitiondecisive»Det offentliga samhället har ansvar för trafiksystemens utveckling och dess infrastruktur. Själva trafiken bör bedrivas i konkurrens.« (party programme ↗)“The public society has responsibility for the development of traffic systems and their infrastructure. Traffic itself should be conducted in competition.”
- competition restrictions are exceptional»Monopol och konkurrensbegränsningar får endast förekomma undantagsvis« (party programme ↗)“Monopoly and competition restrictions may only occur exceptionally”
- oppose unfair competition»effektiv konkurrenspolitik motverkar oligopol, monopol och illojal konkurrens.« (party programme ↗)“effective competition policy opposes oligopoly, monopoly and unfair competition.”
- consumer information»En väl utbyggd konsumentinformation« (party programme ↗)“Well-developed consumer information”
The plan's business policy commitment is the opposite of re-regulation: a free business sector, a third less regulatory red tape and lower administrative costs.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's business policy commitment is the opposite of re-regulation: a free business sector, a third less regulatory red tape and lower administrative costs. A counter-proposal that assumes that deregulation has gone too far and wants to review the entire taxi industry points towards more regulation and greater state control. The party programme furthermore warns that government interventions are far from always the solution.
Original (Swedish)
Planens näringspolitiska åtagande är motsatsen till en omreglering: ett fritt näringsliv, en tredjedel mindre regelkrångel och lägre administrationskostnader. Ett motförslag som utgår från att avregleringen gått för långt och vill se över hela taxibranschen pekar mot fler regler och mer statlig styrning. Partiprogrammet varnar dessutom för att statliga ingripanden långt ifrån alltid är lösningen.
- free enterprisedecisive»Moderaterna vill bygga ett land där ett fritt näringsliv skapar ett välstånd som kommer alla till del.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Moderates want to build a country where a free business sector creates prosperity that benefits everyone.”
- reduced regulatory red tape»Ta bort en tredjedel av företagens administrationskostnader och en tredjedel av regelkrånglet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Remove a third of companies' administrative costs and a third of regulatory red tape”
- government intervention not always the solution»Statliga ingripanden är långt ifrån alltid« (party programme ↗)“Government interventions are far from always”
- market economy as foundation»Grunden för Sveriges välstånd är en marknadsekonomi baserad« (party programme ↗)“The foundation for Sweden's prosperity is a market economy based”
The counter-proposal wants to review the taxi industry because platform actors dump prices and conditions without employer responsibility.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The counter-proposal wants to review the taxi industry because platform actors dump prices and conditions without employer responsibility. The plan defends the Swedish model and wants to increase security in working life, and the party programme is built on a responsibly regulated market economy rather than unregulated price pressure. At the same time the plan values market economy as such, which makes support for a broad review uncertain.
Original (Swedish)
Motförslaget vill se över taxibranschen därför att plattformsaktörer dumpar priser och villkor utan arbetsgivaransvar. Planen försvarar den svenska modellen och vill öka tryggheten i arbetslivet, och partiprogrammet bygger på en ansvarsfullt reglerad marknadsekonomi snarare än oreglerad prispress. Samtidigt värnar planen marknadsekonomin som sådan, vilket gör stödet till en bred översyn osäkert.
- defend the Swedish modeldecisive»Försvara den svenska modellen« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Defend the Swedish model”
- security at work»Öka tryggheten och säkerheten i arbetslivet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Increase security and safety at work”
- responsibly regulated market»reglerad marknadsekonomi, byggd på långsiktigt tänkande, är för oss självklar.« (party programme ↗)“regulated market economy, built on long-term thinking, is for us self-evident.”
- market economy as counterweight»Sverigedemokraterna ser att marknadsekonomi, valfrihet inom välfärden och internationell handel gynnar samhället och är viktigt att försvara« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden Democrats see that market economy, freedom of choice in welfare and international trade benefit society and are important to defend”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2023/24:TU9)
- Committee report full text (HB01TU9)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2023/24:1024 — En sundare och mer hållbar transportbransch av Kalle Olsson (S)
- Motion 2023/24:1177 — Översyn av den dysfunktionella taxibranschen av Linnéa Wickman och Jim Svensk Larm (båda S)
- Motion 2023/24:1251 — Trafikpoliser av Martina Johansson och Mikael Larsson (båda C)
- Motion 2023/24:1519 — En grön klimathandlingsplan för Sverige av Elin Söderberg m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2023/24:1940 — Kontrollplatser för tunga fordon i Sörmland av Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2023/24:2089 — Legitimation för persontransporter med buss av Mattias Eriksson Falk och Roger Hedlund (båda SD)
- Motion 2023/24:2465 — Hållbara och tillgängliga transporter för hela landet av Ulrika Heie m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2023/24:254 — En konkurrenskraftig och säker taxibransch i Sverige av Serkan Köse (S)
- Motion 2023/24:2625 — Utgiftsområde 22 Kommunikationer av Gunilla Svantorp m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2023/24:414 — Ett konkurrenskraftigt svenskt väginfrastruktursystem av Thomas Morell m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:415 — Post och it i hela landet av Jimmy Ståhl m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:425 — En tillväxtorienterad politik för industrilandet Sverige av Tobias Andersson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:5 — Skärpta kontroller av taxiförare av Robert Stenkvist (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:782 — Kontroll av yrkestrafiken av Johanna Haraldsson (S)
Source: The Swedish Parliament