Organization of railway maintenance

The election manifesto explicitly requires that socially important activity and infrastructure that has been privatized be taken back, and that the state increase its control over the infrastructure. The counter-proposal's requirement that Trafikverket [Swedish Transport Administration] be able to conduct railway maintenance in-house with its own staff and equipment is the concrete application of that commitment. The plan also explicitly condemns lowest-price procurement as a governance method.

• take back privatized infrastructuredecisive»Det är hög tid att agera och ta tillbaka den samhällsviktiga verksamhet och infrastruktur som har privatiserats.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It is high time to act and take back the socially important activity and infrastructure that has been privatized.”
• state control over infrastructure»Staten måste öka sin kontroll över infrastruktur och resurser som behövs för att genomföra klimatomställningen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The state must increase its control over infrastructure and resources needed to implement the climate transition.”
• common ownership in key sectors»Vi vill steg för steg stärka det gemensamma ägandet i ekonomins nyckelsektorer och därmed öka de demokratiska beslutens räckvidd.« (party programme ↗)“We want to gradually strengthen common ownership in the economy's key sectors and thereby increase the reach of democratic decisions.”
• upgraded railways»Vägnätet och järnvägen behöver rustas upp i stora delar av Sverige, när industrierna nu expanderar på nya platser.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The road network and railways need to be upgraded in large parts of Sweden as industries now expand in new locations.”

The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.

The party programme explicitly requires that maintenance of roads and railways shall be carried out mainly under state management and that state control and supervision of the railway system shall increase. The counter-proposal's requirement that the state shall be able to carry out maintenance with its own staff and equipment is exactly that commitment. The programme also points out that robustness decreases when maintenance is lacking.

• maintenance under state managementdecisive»Förbättrat underhåll av vägar och järnvägar, huvudsakligen i statlig regi.« (party programme ↗)“Improved maintenance of roads and railways, mainly under state management.”
• state control of railways»Ökad statlig styrning och kontroll över järnvägssystemet.« (party programme ↗)“Increased state control and supervision of the railway system.”
• privatization damages robustness»Infrastrukturens robusthet minskar när underhållet brister och tågtrafiken är« (party programme ↗)“Infrastructure robustness decreases when maintenance is lacking and rail traffic is”
• punctual railway»En järnväg där passagerare och företag kan lita på att tågen går i tid.« (party programme ↗)“A railway where passengers and businesses can rely on trains running on time.”

The plan makes railway maintenance and modernization a state responsibility and wants state actors in the railway sector to be guided toward climate goals rather than profit requirements. The party programme is also critical of unregulated markets solving societal tasks and gives the state responsibility for markets to function. That the state can conduct maintenance in-house when the market does not deliver follows from this.

• state responsibility for railway maintenancedecisive»Det krävs även satsningar på underhåll och upprustning av befintlig infrastruktur,« (party programme ↗)“It also requires investments in maintenance and modernization of existing infrastructure,”
• railways guided toward climate goals»inom järnvägssektorn ska styras mot klimatmålen« (party programme ↗)“in the railway sector shall be guided toward climate goals”
• state responsibility for markets»Staten ska säkerställa att det finns regelverk och institutioner som ser till att marknader« (party programme ↗)“The state shall ensure that there are rules and institutions that see to it that markets”
• modernized railway network»bygga ut och rusta upp järnvägsnätet för snabba tåg i hela landet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“build out and modernize the railway network for fast trains across the country”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

The party programme establishes that Sweden shall have a well-functioning market economy free from planned-economy intervention and that public activity should not compete with the purely private business sector. The counter-proposal's demand that the state should be able to conduct railway maintenance in-house with its own staff and equipment runs counter to that line. The plan certainly wants to upgrade the railways substantially, but the means are investments and predictable rules of the game, not reclaimed state operations.

• no public competitiondecisive»Offentlig verksamhet ska inte konkurrera med det rent privata näringslivet« (party programme ↗)“Public activity shall not compete with the purely private business sector”
• predictable rules of the game»Ekonomin ska ha givna och förutsägbara spelregler« (party programme ↗)“The economy shall have given and predictable rules of the game”
• upgraded railways»Vi vill rusta upp regionala järnvägar, bygga nya stambanor från norr till söder, höja standarden på det nationella stambanenätet i hela landet och storsatsa på morgondagens tågtrafik« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to upgrade regional railways, build new main lines from north to south, raise standards on the national main-line network across the country and make a major push for tomorrow's rail traffic”

flags: citat_blockerat

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

The party programme establishes that the public shall only conduct business activities if there is strong public interest and not drive activities that crowd out functioning private alternatives. Allowing the state to conduct railway maintenance in-house with its own personnel and own machinery goes against that principle; the plan's answer is instead procurement that provides low costs, high quality and stimulates competition. The goal of punctual trains is however shared by the plan.

• no crowding out of privatedecisive»Det offentliga ska inte driva verksamheter som tränger ut fungerande privata alternativ eller försvårar nyföretagande.« (party programme ↗)“The public shall not conduct activities that crowd out functioning private alternatives or impede new business formation.”
• limited state business operations»Det offentliga ska endast driva affärsverksamhet om det finns ett starkt samhällsintresse.« (party programme ↗)“The public shall only conduct business activities if there is strong public interest.”
• procurement with quality and competition»Offentlig upphandling ska ske på sätt som ger skattebetalarna låga kostnader, hög kvalitet, säkrar likabehandling och stimulerar konkurrens.« (party programme ↗)“Public procurement shall occur in ways that give taxpayers low costs, high quality, secures equal treatment and stimulates competition.”
• punctual railway»Vi vill bygga bort järnvägsnätets flaskhalsar och så att tågen går i tid här och nu i stället för att lägga hundratals miljarder på en höghastighetsjärnväg som inte är klar ens om 20 år.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to build away the railway network's bottlenecks and so that trains run on time here and now instead of laying hundreds of billions on a high-speed railway that won't even be ready in 20 years.”

The plan divides responsibility so that the public is responsible for infrastructure while traffic itself should be conducted in competition, and requires that public activity as far as possible is based on absence of monopoly. The counter-proposal's demand that the state itself conduct railway maintenance in-house with its own staff and its own equipment goes in the opposite direction. The plan's answer to lack of quality is instead a commissioning role and functioning competition.

• traffic in competitiondecisive»Själva trafiken bör bedrivas i konkurrens.« (party programme ↗)“Traffic itself should be conducted in competition.”
• absence of monopoly»Den offentliga sektorns verksamhetsformer ska så långt möjligt bygga på« (party programme ↗)“Public sector activities shall as far as possible be based on”
• public infrastructure responsibility»Det offentliga samhället har ansvar för trafiksystemens utveckling och dess infrastruktur.« (party programme ↗)“The public society has responsibility for the development of traffic systems and their infrastructure.”
• effective competition»En väl fungerande marknadsekonomi förutsätter en effektiv konkurrens, stabila institutioner« (party programme ↗)“A well-functioning market economy requires effective competition, stable institutions”

The plan's consistent position is that the state should be strong in its core tasks but not expand its own production, and that a free business sector creates prosperity. Allowing the state to take back railway maintenance under its own management with its own staff and machines goes against that position. The plan's railway policy is instead about upgrading existing railways so that trains run on time, not about changing the mode of operation.

• limited state activitydecisive»En stor stat leder till ett svagare samhälle.« (party programme ↗)“A large state leads to a weaker society.”
• free enterprise creates prosperity»Moderaterna vill bygga ett land där ett fritt näringsliv skapar ett välstånd som kommer alla till del.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Moderates want to build a country where a free business sector creates prosperity that benefits everyone.”
• upgrade existing railways»Rusta upp dagens järnväg i stället för att satsa på höghastighetståg som riskerar att vara omoderna redan innan de är klara« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Upgrade today's railways instead of investing in high-speed trains that risk being outdated before they are even completed”
• punctual train traffic as a goal»Vi vill ta ansvar för att tågen går i tid och att vägarna håller hög kvalitet i stället för låg hastighet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to take responsibility for trains running on time and roads maintaining high quality instead of low speed.”

The plan establishes that essential parts of infrastructure should be under state control and that state and municipality must retain significant influence over infrastructure. The counter-proposal requires that the state shall be able to conduct railway maintenance in-house when the market does not deliver, which aligns with this and with the plan's prioritization of an upgraded and functioning railway network. The plan is furthermore explicitly pragmatic about operational arrangements and places results foremost.

• state control of infrastructuredecisive»väsentliga delar av vår infrastruktur bör stå under statlig kontroll« (party programme ↗)“essential parts of our infrastructure should be under state control”
• upgraded railway network»Rusta upp väg- och järnvägsnätet i hela landet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Upgrade road and rail networks across the country”
• public influence over infrastructure»behålla ett betydande mått av inflytande över infrastruktur och kollektivtrafik.« (party programme ↗)“retain a significant degree of influence over infrastructure and public transport.”
• pragmatic view of operational arrangements»intar Sverigedemokraterna ett pragmatiskt och resultatinriktat förhållningssätt« (party programme ↗)“Sweden Democrats adopt a pragmatic and results-oriented approach”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.