2024-05-292023/24:SfU16 · p.3SfUMigration & social insurance
Erroneous payments and high sick leave cost reimbursements
Abolition of the reimbursement for high sick-pay costs
What's at stake: The outcome affects employers, especially smaller companies, who can currently receive reimbursement for high sick-pay costs, at a time when the scheme, according to an audit, has led to substantial incorrect payments and risked weakening incentives to prevent sick leave.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the reimbursement to employers for high sick-pay costs should be abolished entirely, or whether it should instead be developed and better controlled in line with the recommendations of the Swedish National Audit Office.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee agrees with the government's assessment that the reimbursement for high sick-pay costs has had negative consequences - including payouts becoming considerably higher than expected and the largely automated processing increasing the risk of incorrect payments and weakening incentives to reduce sick leave - a view also supported by the National Audit Office's review, and therefore backs the proposal to abolish the reimbursement.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 2 (MP)
The dissenters believe the reimbursement for high sick-pay costs should not be abolished but instead developed, and want the government to follow the National Audit Office's recommendations to strengthen coordination between the relevant agencies, review the information exchange between them, and propose regulatory changes to reduce the risk of incorrect payments.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 2 by MP.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Yes 18/0/0/6 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| S | No | Yes 91/0/0/15 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | derived |
| MP | No | No 0/15/0/3 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| C | No | Yes 19/0/0/5 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| L | No | Yes 11/0/0/5 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| KD | No | Yes 16/0/0/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | derived |
| M | Yes | Yes 58/0/0/10 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| SD | No | Yes 61/0/0/11 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2023/24:2822 by Mats Berglund et al. (MP) demands 1 and 2, and 2023/24:2835 by Mats Berglund et al. (MP) demands 2 and 3.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2023/24:2822 av Mats Berglund m.fl. (MP) yrkandena 1 och 2 samt 2023/24:2835 av Mats Berglund m.fl. (MP) yrkandena 2 och 3.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag approved the government's proposal that reimbursement for high sick leave costs should cease. The reimbursement scheme, which has existed for just under ten years, means that employers in certain cases have the right to reimbursement from the state for their sick leave costs. The Riksdag agrees with the government's description of the current economic situation and the need for public funds to be used efficiently. Like the government, the Riksdag also emphasizes that control possibilities are limited and increase the risk of erroneous payments. The provisions regarding the reimbursement shall, according to the proposal, cease to apply at the end of June 2024, but reimbursement shall still be able to be paid out for certain costs relating to the time before that. In addition to the bill, the Riksdag also considered a communication from the government regarding the Swedish National Audit Office's report on the system for reimbursement for high sick leave costs. In the communication, the government assesses that there is no reason to take any action based on the Swedish National Audit Office's findings since the reimbursement scheme, according to the government's proposal, shall be abolished. Against this background, the Riksdag filed the communication as handled, that is, concluded the matter.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to develop the compensation for high sick leave costs. (MP) — Reservation 2
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The party programme wants work to be organized so that everyone can contribute according to ability regardless of how we function physically or intellectually, and states that people with norm-breaking disabilities have higher unemployment.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme wants work to be organized so that everyone can contribute according to ability regardless of how we function physically or intellectually, and states that people with norm-breaking disabilities have higher unemployment. Removing compensation for high sick leave costs risks instead making employers more selective. The counter-proposal's line to instead develop compensation and address incorrect payments thus follows from the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet vill att arbetet organiseras så att alla kan bidra efter förmåga oavsett hur vi fungerar fysiskt eller intellektuellt, och konstaterar att människor med normbrytande funktionalitet har högre arbetslöshet. Att ta bort ersättningen för höga sjuklönekostnader riskerar tvärtom att göra arbetsgivare mer selektiva. Motförslagets linje att i stället utveckla ersättningen och åtgärda felaktiga utbetalningar följer därför av planen.
- everyone can contribute according to abilitydecisive»arbetet så att alla, oavsett hur vi fungerar fysiskt eller intellektuellt,« (party programme ↗)“work so that everyone, regardless of how we function physically or intellectually,”
- prevent exclusion from work»Människor med normbrytande funktionalitet har idag som grupp« (party programme ↗)“People with norm-breaking disabilities today as a group”
- humane sickness insurance»Vänsterpartiet vill se en mänsklig sjukförsäkring och ett slut på utförsäkrandet av sjuka.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Left Party wants to see humane sickness insurance and an end to exclusion from the insurance of the sick.”
- workplace health reduces sick leave»arbetsmiljöarbete på alla arbetsplatser, också de som idag prioriterar« (party programme ↗)“workplace health and safety work at all workplaces, including those that today prioritize”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto establishes that persons with disabilities shall be able to live like others and that work is central to participation, which speaks against a change that risks employers selecting against persons with illness history.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto establishes that persons with disabilities shall be able to live like others and that work is central to participation, which speaks against a change that risks employers selecting against persons with illness history. At the same time, the plan wants to stop welfare crime and incorrect payments, which the counter-proposal addresses through targeted measures instead of abolishment. However, the plan does not address sick leave cost compensation, so the assessment is derived.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet slår fast att personer med funktionsnedsättning ska kunna leva som andra och att arbete är centralt för delaktigheten, vilket talar mot en förändring som riskerar att arbetsgivare väljer bort personer med sjukdomshistoria. Samtidigt vill planen stoppa välfärdsbrottslighet och felaktiga utbetalningar, vilket motförslaget tillgodoser genom riktade åtgärder i stället för avskaffande. Planen behandlar dock inte sjuklönekostnadsersättningen, så bedömningen är härledd.
- work for persons with disabilitiesdecisive»Personer med funktionsnedsättning ska kunna leva sitt liv som andra. Arbete och sysselsättning är centralt för delaktigheten i samhället.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Persons with disabilities shall be able to live their lives like others. Work and employment are central to participation in society.”
- individually designed job measures»Vi vill se mer individuellt utformade insatser för att skapa jobb eller utbildning för personer med funktionsnedsättningar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to see more individually designed measures to create jobs or education for persons with disabilities.”
- stop incorrect payments»Skattefusk, välfärdsbrottslighet och penningtvätt ska stoppas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Tax fraud, welfare crime and money laundering shall be stopped.”
- long-term conditions for business»Stärk de långsiktiga förutsättningarna för företagande och innovation.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strengthen the long-term conditions for business and innovation.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The party programme explicitly wants small enterprises to have less sickness benefit responsibility than larger enterprises and sees reduced or eliminated sickness benefit responsibility as an important reform for increased entrepreneurship.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme explicitly wants small enterprises to have less sickness benefit responsibility than larger enterprises and sees reduced or eliminated sickness benefit responsibility as an important reform for increased entrepreneurship. Eliminating compensation for high sickness benefit costs goes in the opposite direction and risks the discrimination of sick and disabled persons that the plan wants to counteract. The counter-proposal's line of developing instead of eliminating is therefore supported.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet vill uttryckligen att småföretag ska ha mindre sjuklöneansvar än större företag och ser slopat eller minskat sjuklöneansvar som en viktig reform för ökat företagande. Att avskaffa ersättningen för höga sjuklönekostnader går åt motsatt håll och riskerar dessutom den selektering av sjuka och funktionsnedsatta som planen vill motverka. Motförslagets linje att utveckla i stället för att avskaffa stöds därför.
- less sickness benefit responsibility for small enterprisesdecisive»arbetsgivaravgift och mindre sjuklöneansvar än« (party programme ↗)“employer contribution and less sickness benefit responsibility than”
- reduced sickness benefit responsibility»minskat sjuklöneansvar viktiga reformer för ökat« (party programme ↗)“reduced sickness benefit responsibility important reforms for increased”
- counteract discrimination in the workplace»Diskriminering drabbar inte bara individen, utan« (party programme ↗)“Discrimination affects not only the individual, but”
- working environment before deductions»höja lönerna och säkra en god arbetsmiljö i vården« (2022 manifesto ↗)“raise wages and ensure a good working environment in care”
The plan's core commitment in this area is to make it cheaper and easier to hire, particularly people distant from the labour market, and for the party to be small business's best friend.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's core commitment in this area is to make it cheaper and easier to hire, particularly people distant from the labour market, and for the party to be small business's best friend. A compensation protecting smaller employers against high sick-leave costs serves precisely this, which suggests developing it rather than removing it. The plan's requirement to economise with taxpayers' money simultaneously supports the counter-proposal's demand for measures against incorrect payments.
Original (Swedish)
Planens bärande åtagande på området är att det ska bli billigare och lättare att anställa, särskilt personer som står långt från arbetsmarknaden, och att partiet ska vara småföretagens bästa vän. En ersättning som skyddar mindre arbetsgivare mot höga sjuklönekostnader tjänar just detta, vilket talar för att utveckla den snarare än att ta bort den. Planens krav på att hushålla med skattebetalarnas pengar stödjer samtidigt motförslagets krav på åtgärder mot felaktiga utbetalningar.
- cheaper to hiredecisive»Det måste bli billigare och lättare att anställa, särskilt personer som står långt från arbetsmarknaden.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It must become cheaper and easier to hire, particularly people distant from the labour market.”
- small business conditions»Därför kommer Centerpartiet alltid att vara småföretagens bästa vän i svensk politik.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Centre Party will therefore always be small business's best friend in Swedish politics.”
- security system adapted to entrepreneurs»Vi vill reformera trygghetssystemet så att fler kvinnor kan satsa på enreprenörskap och se till att statligt riskkapital fördelas mer jämställt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to reform the security system so that more women can pursue entrepreneurship and see to it that state venture capital is distributed more equally.”
- economise with tax funds»Politiken ska hushålla med skattebetalarnas pengar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Policy shall economise with taxpayers' money.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan wants to ease companies' sickness benefit burden, primarily by abolishing the second sickness benefit week, and make it simpler and cheaper to hire.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to ease companies' sickness benefit burden, primarily by abolishing the second sickness benefit week, and make it simpler and cheaper to hire. Abolishing compensation for high sickness benefit costs goes in the opposite direction, while the counter-proposal's line that instead develop the system and improve information exchange between authorities aligns with the plan. The substantive demand is thus supported.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill lätta företagens sjuklönebörda, i första hand genom att avskaffa den andra sjuklöneveckan, och göra det enklare och billigare att anställa. Att avskaffa ersättningen för höga sjuklönekostnader går i motsatt riktning, medan motförslagets linje att i stället utveckla systemet och förbättra myndigheternas informationsutbyte ligger i linje med planen. Sakkravet stöds därför.
- eased sickness benefit burdendecisive»I första hand bör ett avskaffande av den andra sjuklöneveckan prioriteras.« (party programme ↗)“First and foremost, abolishing the second sickness benefit week should be prioritized.”
- cheaper to hire»Därför vill vi att det ska bli enklare och billigare att anställa genom att arbetsgivaravgifterna sänks för både småföretagare och för dem som vill anställa unga.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Therefore, we want it to become simpler and cheaper to hire by lowering employer contributions for both small business owners and for those who want to hire young people.”
- information exchange between authorities»myndigheter effektivt kan dela information med varandra.« (party programme ↗)“authorities can efficiently share information with each other.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The counter-proposal wants to follow the National Audit Office's recommendations for strengthened coordination and better information exchange between authorities, which is close to the election manifesto's demand for a comprehensive review of confidentiality rules so that authorities can share information.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The counter-proposal wants to follow the National Audit Office's recommendations for strengthened coordination and better information exchange between authorities, which is close to the election manifesto's demand for a comprehensive review of confidentiality rules so that authorities can share information. The plan also requires that incoming laws be tested from a small business perspective and sees cost follow-up as an important political task.
Original (Swedish)
Motförslaget vill följa Riksrevisionens rekommendationer om stärkt samordning och bättre informationsutbyte mellan myndigheter, vilket ligger nära valmanifestets krav på en total översyn av sekretessreglerna så att myndigheter kan dela uppgifter. Planen kräver också att tillkommande lagar prövas ur ett småföretagarperspektiv och ser kostnadsuppföljning som en viktig politisk uppgift.
- authorities shall share informationdecisive»Total översyn av sekretessreglerna, så att myndigheter kan dela uppgifter mellan sig för att förebygga och klara upp brott.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Comprehensive review of confidentiality rules, so that authorities can share information between them to prevent and solve crimes.”
- small business perspective in legislation»Tillkommande lagar bör prövas ur ett småföretagarperspektiv.« (party programme ↗)“Incoming laws should be tested from a small business perspective.”
- cost follow-up and control»Utvärdering, kostnadsuppföljning och kvalitetskontroll är därför viktiga politiska« (party programme ↗)“Evaluation, cost follow-up and quality control are therefore important political”
- against discrimination in working life»Väl fungerande lagar mot all diskriminering i arbetslivet ska finnas.« (party programme ↗)“Well-functioning laws against all discrimination in working life shall exist.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto makes the fight against incorrect payments a main issue and sets the goal of halving benefit fraud, and the party programme establishes that public waste in all forms should be combated.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto makes the fight against incorrect payments a main issue and sets the goal of halving benefit fraud, and the party programme establishes that public waste in all forms should be combated. An automated compensation with weak control options and significantly overrun costs is exactly such a payment the plan wants to address. Although easing employers' costs is a plan goal, the plan chooses targeted reductions over broad automatic replacements.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet gör kampen mot felaktiga utbetalningar till en huvudfråga och sätter målet att halvera bidragsbrotten, och idéprogrammet slår fast att offentligt slöseri i alla former ska bekämpas. En automatiserad ersättning med svaga kontrollmöjligheter och kraftigt överskridna kostnader är just en sådan utbetalning planen vill komma åt. Att lätta arbetsgivarnas kostnader är visserligen ett planmål, men planen väljer riktade nedsättningar framför breda automatiska ersättningar.
- stop incorrect paymentsdecisive(2022 manifesto)
- halved benefit fraud»I ett första steg är målet att halvera bidragsbrotten under nästa mandatperiod.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“In a first step, the goal is to halve benefit fraud during the next term.”
- combat public waste»Offentligt slöseri i alla former ska bekämpas.« (party programme ↗)“Public waste in all forms should be combated.”
- targeted reduced employment costs»Kraftigt sänka anställningskostnaderna för den som anställer nyanlända och långtidsarbetslösa« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Significantly reduce employment costs for those employing newly arrived and long-term unemployed”
flags: citat_ej_verifierat
The plan wants to reduce sick leave costs for small businesses and points out that extensive sick leave responsibility can determine a small company's survival, which argues for maintaining and developing the compensation rather than abolishing it.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to reduce sick leave costs for small businesses and points out that extensive sick leave responsibility can determine a small company's survival, which argues for maintaining and developing the compensation rather than abolishing it. Simultaneously, the plan requires coordination between relevant authorities and action against welfare crime in social insurance. The counter-proposal's line to fix the flaws rather than remove support thereby fits within the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill sänka sjuklönekostnaderna för småföretag och pekar på att ett långtgående sjuklöneansvar kan avgöra ett litet företags överlevnad, vilket talar för att behålla och utveckla ersättningen snarare än att avskaffa den. Samtidigt kräver planen samordning mellan berörda myndigheter och krafttag mot välfärdsbrottslighet inom socialförsäkringen. Motförslagets linje att åtgärda felen i stället för att ta bort stödet ryms därmed i planen.
- lower sick leave costsdecisive»Sänka arbetsgivaravgiften och sjuklönekostnaderna för småföretag« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Lower employer contributions and sick leave costs for small businesses”
- sick leave responsibility burdens small businesses»Långtgående ansvar vid sjukskrivningar kan vara avgörande för ett litet företags överlevnadsmöjligheter.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Extensive responsibility for sick leave can be decisive for a small company's survival prospects.”
- coordination between authorities»Sverigedemokraterna vill också verka för ett mer samordnat system mellan berörda myndigheter för att enskilda inte ska komma i kläm.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden Democrats also want to work for a more coordinated system between relevant authorities so that individuals are not caught in the middle.”
- against incorrect payments»Stoppa välfärdsbrottsligheten inom socialförsäkringen« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Stop welfare crime in social insurance”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2023/24:SfU16)
- Committee report full text (HB01SfU16)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2023/24:2822 — med anledning av skr. 2023/24:69 Riksrevisionens rapport om ersättning för höga sjuklönekostnader av Mats Berglund m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2023/24:2835 — med anledning av prop. 2023/24:83 Ersättning för höga sjuklönekostnader upphör av Mats Berglund m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2023/24:2839 — med anledning av prop. 2023/24:83 Ersättning för höga sjuklönekostnader upphör av Isabell Mixter m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2023/24:2841 — med anledning av prop. 2023/24:83 Ersättning för höga sjuklönekostnader upphör av Anders W Jonsson m.fl. (C)
- Proposition 2023/24:83 — Ersättning för höga sjuklönekostnader upphör
- Regeringens skrivelse 2023/24:69 — Riksrevisionens rapport om ersättning för höga sjuklönekostnader
Source: The Swedish Parliament