2026-04-222025/26:UU6 · p.5UUForeign affairs

The Non-Proliferation Treaty, NPT

Sweden's position ahead of the review of the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT)

What's at stake: The position affects how active and driving a role Sweden takes in global disarmament work ahead of the NPT review, which in turn concerns trust between nuclear-armed and non-nuclear-armed states.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

The question is how Sweden should act ahead of the next review conference of the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT): whether the current approach through the treaty and the Stockholm Initiative is sufficient, or whether Sweden should push harder for new requirements, such as raising the threshold for the use of nuclear weapons.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The committee maintains that the NPT should remain the overarching framework for global disarmament and non-proliferation, stresses the importance of progress at the next review conference, and notes with approval the government's work on the Stockholm Initiative as a way to reduce risks and strengthen trust between states, and therefore rejects the motions.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 11 (C)

The reservation (C) wants Sweden to take a clearer, more driving role in disarmament work, push for balanced disarmament and for strengthening and developing the NPT, and wants new requirements that raise the threshold for the use of nuclear weapons ahead of the upcoming review.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 11 by C.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
VNoAbstain 0/0/16/6departs from the planconfidence: highexplicit
SNoAbstain 0/5/85/16departs from the planconfidence: highexplicit
MPNoAbstain 1/2/10/5departs from the planconfidence: highexplicit
Cown reservationNoNo 0/20/0/4follows the planconfidence: mediumderived
LNoYes 11/0/0/5departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed
KDNoYes 14/0/0/5departs from the planconfidence: mediumderived
MYesYes 55/0/0/11follows the planconfidence: lownot addressed
SDNoYes 60/0/0/10departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed

Broke with the party line

SFredrik Olovsson (S, Södermanlands län)No — party line: Abstain
SKadir Kasirga (S, Stockholms kommun)No — party line: Abstain
SMats Wiking (S, Västra Götalands läns norra)No — party line: Abstain
SMikael Damberg (S, Stockholms län)No — party line: Abstain
SSofia Skönnbrink (S, Värmlands län)No — party line: Abstain
MPAmanda Lind (MP, Stockholms län)Yes — party line: Abstain
MPEmma Nohrén (MP, Göteborgs kommun)No — party line: Abstain
MPLeila Ali Elmi (MP, Göteborgs kommun)No — party line: Abstain

MPs whose vote differs from their party's majority position in this division. Marked with a dark ring in the chamber view.

Committee proposal

The Riksdag rejects the motions 2024/25:3107 by Morgan Johansson et al. (S) motion item 31, 2024/25:3162 by Kerstin Lundgren et al. (C) motion item 57, 2025/26:3623 by Morgan Johansson et al. (S) motion item 54, and 2025/26:3729 by Kerstin Lundgren et al. (C) motion item 72.

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2024/25:3107 av Morgan Johansson m.fl. (S) yrkande 31, 2024/25:3162 av Kerstin Lundgren m.fl. (C) yrkande 57, 2025/26:3623 av Morgan Johansson m.fl. (S) yrkande 54 och 2025/26:3729 av Kerstin Lundgren m.fl. (C) yrkande 72.

Riksdag decision: The Riksdag rejected 51 proposals in motions concerning security policy and disarmament from the general motion period 2024 and 2025. The proposals deal, among other things, with Sweden's NATO membership, nuclear weapons, international operations, and the agreement on defence cooperation between Sweden and the USA, the so-called DCA agreement. The Riksdag refers, among other things, to ongoing work within the areas that the proposals cover.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietNoAbstaindeparts from the planexplicit

The plan requires that the world move towards peace, disarmament and fewer weapons in circulation, and that Sweden works for a world completely free from nuclear weapons.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan requires that the world move towards peace, disarmament and fewer weapons in circulation, and that Sweden works for a world completely free from nuclear weapons. Taking a clearer driving role in disarmament work and pushing demands that raise the thresholds for nuclear weapon use in the NPT review is precisely that line. The plan also points to nuclear weapons development as an unacceptable risk.

Original (Swedish)

Planen kräver att världen går mot fred, nedrustning och färre vapen i cirkulation och att Sverige arbetar för en värld helt fri från kärnvapen. Att ta en tydligare pådrivande roll i nedrustningsarbetet och driva krav som höjer trösklarna för kärnvapenanvändning inför NPT-översynen är precis den linjen. Planen pekar dessutom ut kärnvapenutvecklingen som en oacceptabel risk.

  • nuclear-weapon-free worlddecisive»Vi vill se ett förbud mot kärnvapen på svensk mark och arbetar för en värld helt fri från kärnvapen.« (party programme ↗)“We want to see a ban on nuclear weapons on Swedish territory and work for a world completely free from nuclear weapons.”
  • disarmament»Världen behöver gå mot fred, nedrustning och färre vapen i cirkulation.« (party programme ↗)“The world needs to move towards peace, disarmament and fewer weapons in circulation.”
  • sign the nuclear weapons convention»Sverige ska öka biståndet, stärka FN och skriva under kärnvapenkonventionen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden should increase aid, strengthen the UN and sign the nuclear weapons convention.”
  • nuclear weapons as unacceptable risk»Särskilt utvecklingen av kärnvapen ställer världen inför oacceptabla risker.« (party programme ↗)“Particularly the development of nuclear weapons presents the world with unacceptable risks.”

The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.

SSocialdemokraternaNoAbstaindeparts from the planexplicit

The party programme requires driving work for détente, non-proliferation and mutual international disarmament, which is exactly the role the counter-proposal wants Sweden to take regarding the NPT review.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The party programme requires driving work for détente, non-proliferation and mutual international disarmament, which is exactly the role the counter-proposal wants Sweden to take regarding the NPT review. The election manifesto establishes that the party condemns all threats of nuclear weapon use and continues to work for a world free from nuclear weapons, which supports the requirement for higher thresholds for nuclear weapon use. The plan therefore supports the counter-proposal.

Original (Swedish)

Partiprogrammet kräver ett pådrivande arbete för avspänning, icke-spridning och en ömsesidig internationell nedrustning, vilket är precis den roll motförslaget vill att Sverige tar inför NPT-översynen. Valmanifestet slår fast att partiet fördömer allt hot om användning av kärnvapen och fortsätter verka för en värld fri från kärnvapen, vilket bär kravet på högre trösklar för kärnvapenanvändning. Planen stöder därför motförslaget.

  • driving for non-proliferationdecisive»Pådrivande arbete för avspänning, icke-spridning och en ömsesidig internationell« (party programme ↗)“Driving work for détente, non-proliferation and mutual international”
  • raised thresholds against nuclear weapons»Vi fördömer allt hot om användning av kärnvapen och fortsätter verka för det enda rimliga slutmålet: en värld fri från kärnvapen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We condemn all threats of nuclear weapon use and continue to work for the only reasonable end goal: a world free from nuclear weapons.”
  • Swedish disarmament tradition»Vi har en lång historia av att stå upp för folkrätten, solidaritet, nedrustning, demokrati och jämställdhet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We have a long history of standing up for international law, solidarity, disarmament, democracy and equality.”
  • no nuclear weapons in Sweden»Inga kärnvapen på svenskt territorium.« (party programme ↗)“No nuclear weapons on Swedish territory.”

The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.

MPMiljöpartietNoAbstaindeparts from the planexplicit

The plan wants Sweden to be an independent voice working for long-term global disarmament and wants nuclear weapons dismantled and banned.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan wants Sweden to be an independent voice working for long-term global disarmament and wants nuclear weapons dismantled and banned. It furthermore requires that NATO adopt the principle of no first use, that is precisely the kind of raised thresholds for use that the counter-proposal demands. A more driving role in disarmament work follows directly from the plan.

Original (Swedish)

Planen vill att Sverige är en självständig röst som verkar för långsiktig global nedrustning och att kärnvapen avvecklas och förbjuds. Den kräver dessutom att Nato antar principen om no first use, alltså precis den typ av höjda trösklar för användning som motförslaget efterlyser. En mer pådrivande roll i nedrustningsarbetet följer direkt av planen.

  • driving for disarmamentdecisive»för den humanitära rätten och verkar för en långsiktig global nedrustning.« (party programme ↗)“for humanitarian law and works for long-term global disarmament.”
  • raised thresholds for nuclear weapons»Vi anser att Nato bör anta principen om no first use av kärnvapen« (party programme ↗)“We believe that NATO should adopt the principle of no first use of nuclear weapons”
  • nuclear weapons ban»ratificera konventionen om kärnvapenförbud« (2022 manifesto ↗)“ratify the convention on nuclear weapons ban”
  • nuclear-weapon-free Sweden»Sverige ska vara en kärnvapenfri zon i både freds- och krigstid.« (party programme ↗)“Sweden shall be a nuclear-weapon-free zone in both peacetime and wartime.”

The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.

CCenterpartietNoNofollows the planderived

The party programme establishes that shared challenges can only be solved through international cooperation and that peace operations, cooperation, and dialogue become increasingly important, with the UN as an arena that needs to develop.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The party programme establishes that shared challenges can only be solved through international cooperation and that peace operations, cooperation, and dialogue become increasingly important, with the UN as an arena that needs to develop. A more driving Swedish role for balanced disarmament and for strengthening the non-proliferation treaty aligns with this and requires, unlike a unilateral ban agreement, no review of the defence line.

Original (Swedish)

Partiprogrammet slår fast att gemensamma utmaningar bara kan lösas genom internationellt samarbete och att fredsinsatser, samarbete och dialog blir allt viktigare, med FN som arena som behöver utvecklas. En mer pådrivande svensk roll för balanserad nedrustning och för att stärka icke-spridningsfördraget ligger i linje med detta och kräver, till skillnad från ett ensidigt förbudsavtal, ingen omprövning av försvarslinjen.

  • international cooperationdecisive»Utmaningar som är gemensamma för många nationer, som tullmurar, klimatfrågan och internationell brottslighet, kan bara lösas genom internationellt samarbete.« (party programme ↗)“Challenges that are shared by many nations, such as trade barriers, the climate question, and international crime, can only be solved through international cooperation.”
  • dialogue and disarmament»Dagens internationella ekonomiska beroende ökar betydelsen av fredsinsatser, samarbete och dialog.« (party programme ↗)“Today's international economic interdependence increases the importance of peace operations, cooperation, and dialogue.”
  • rights-driven foreign policy»Utrikes- och säkerhetspolitiken syftar ytterst till att värna universella mänskliga fri- och rättigheter.« (party programme ↗)“Foreign and security policy ultimately aims to safeguard universal human rights and freedoms.”
  • balanced disarmament»Vi kan inte förutsätta att avspänning och demilitarisering ska prägla vår värld.« (party programme ↗)“We cannot assume that détente and demilitarisation will characterise our world.”
LLiberalernaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan says nothing about the Non-Proliferation Treaty or disarmament work.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan says nothing about the Non-Proliferation Treaty or disarmament work. The closest principle is that Sweden shall contribute to security through broad international cooperation and that the UN has a special position as a peace actor, which speaks for a more active role for a strengthened treaty. As the plan also makes NATO the cornerstone, support is limited to balanced disarmament.

Original (Swedish)

Planen säger ingenting om icke-spridningsfördraget eller om nedrustningsarbetet. Närmast liggande princip är att Sverige ska bidra till säkerhet genom breda internationella samarbeten och att FN har en särställning som fredsaktör, vilket talar för en mer pådrivande roll för ett stärkt fördrag. Eftersom planen samtidigt gör Nato till hörnsten är stödet begränsat till en balanserad nedrustning.

  • security through cooperationdecisive»Sverige ska bidra till säkerhet i en osäker omvärld, och stå upp för demokrati och mänskliga« (party programme ↗)“Sweden shall contribute to security in an uncertain world, and stand up for democracy and human”
  • UN's central role»Förenta nationerna (FN) har en särställning som den viktigaste globala aktören för fred och« (party programme ↗)“The United Nations (UN) has a special position as the most important global actor for peace and”
  • NATO as cornerstone»Nato är den absolut viktigaste samarbetsorganisationen för säkerhet och« (party programme ↗)“NATO is the absolutely most important cooperation organization for security and”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

KDKristdemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The plan establishes that peace cannot be built without active and creative efforts and that compliance with international obligations must be guaranteed through a protected and strengthened UN system.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan establishes that peace cannot be built without active and creative efforts and that compliance with international obligations must be guaranteed through a protected and strengthened UN system. A more driving Swedish role for balanced disarmament and raised thresholds for nuclear weapons use follows from this, as does the proportionality requirement for armed interventions. The plan does not, however, explicitly mention the non-proliferation treaty.

Original (Swedish)

Planen slår fast att fred inte kan byggas utan aktiva och skapande ansträngningar och att efterlevnaden av internationella förpliktelser måste garanteras genom en skyddad och stärkt FN-ordning. En mer pådrivande svensk roll för balanserad nedrustning och höjda trösklar för kärnvapenanvändning följer av detta, liksom av proportionalitetskravet vid vapeninsatser. Planen nämner dock inte icke-spridningsfördraget uttryckligen.

  • active peace workdecisive»utan aktiva och skapande ansträngningar.« (party programme ↗)“without active and creative efforts.”
  • strengthened UN and international law»förpliktelser garanteras. Därför måste FN:s ställning skyddas och stärkas, liksom olika« (party programme ↗)“obligations guaranteed. Therefore the UN's position must be protected and strengthened, as must various”
  • proportionality in use of arms»Vapeninsatsen måste stå i proportion till det som avses att försvaras« (party programme ↗)“Armed intervention must be proportionate to what is intended to be defended”
  • preparedness against nuclear weapons threats»Sverige måste kunna möta angrepp från internationell kriminalitet, terrorism,« (party programme ↗)“Sweden must be able to meet attacks from international crime, terrorism,”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MModeraternaYesYesfollows the plannot addressed

The plan does not address disarmament work or the non-proliferation treaty.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan does not address disarmament work or the non-proliferation treaty. The closest principle is that Sweden shall be a full NATO member with a high level of ambition and that security rests on war-deterring deterrence, which speaks against Sweden driving new demands that raise the threshold for nuclear weapons use. The assessment is therefore uncertain.

Original (Swedish)

Planen behandlar inte nedrustningsarbetet eller ickespridningsfördraget. Den närmast liggande principen är att Sverige ska vara en fullvärdig Natomedlem med hög ambitionsnivå och att säkerheten vilar på krigsavhållande avskräckning, vilket talar emot att Sverige driver nya krav som höjer trösklarna för kärnvapenanvändning. Bedömningen är därför osäker.

  • full NATO membershipdecisive»Vi ska vara en fullvärdig medlem i Nato« (party programme ↗)“We shall be a full member of NATO”
  • high ambition in NATO»Moderaterna vill sätta en hög ambitionsnivå för Sverige som blivande Natomedlem.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Moderates want to set a high level of ambition for Sweden as a future NATO member.”
  • deterrence as a security foundation»Målet är att det svenska försvaret ska vara krigsavhållande och avskräcka en eventuell motståndare från att angripa Sverige.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The goal is that the Swedish defense shall be war-deterring and deter a potential opponent from attacking Sweden.”
SDSverigedemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The documents do not address nuclear disarmament or the non-proliferation treaty.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The documents do not address nuclear disarmament or the non-proliferation treaty. The closest lying principle is that inter-state cooperation is a prerequisite for stability and peace and that Sweden shall be a clear voice for the Western democracy model. A balanced disarmament effort within an established treaty does not conflict with these principles, but the plan gives no explicit support.

Original (Swedish)

Dokumenten behandlar inte kärnvapennedrustning eller ickespridningsfördraget. Närmast liggande princip är att mellanstatligt samarbete är en förutsättning för stabilitet och fred och att Sverige ska vara en tydlig röst för den västerländska demokratimodellen. Ett balanserat nedrustningsarbete inom ett etablerat fördrag strider inte mot dessa principer, men planen ger inget uttryckligt stöd.

  • inter-state cooperation for peacedecisive»Samarbete är en förutsättning för stabilitet och fred i världen.« (party programme ↗)“Cooperation is a prerequisite for stability and peace in the world.”
  • clear voice in the world»Vara en tydlig röst för den västerländska demokratimodellen och mänskliga fri- och rättigheter« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Be a clear voice for the Western democracy model and human freedoms and rights”
  • Swedish interests in negotiations»Värna svenska intressen i internationella sammanhang« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Value Swedish interests in international contexts”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament