2023-03-092022/23:KrU6 · p.5KrUCulture
Museum matters
Museums' independence and operations
What's at stake: The outcome affects museums' independence, how collections and cultural heritage are managed, and which groups gain access to museum visits, for example through free admission, which matters for both cultural policy and social inclusion.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether parliament should direct new demands at the government on museums' independence, operations and handling of collections, such as expanded free admission, or whether the committee chooses to wait and monitor the issues without new pronouncements.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee opposes the motions. It points out that the Museums Act already sets out general starting points for museums' work on collections management, knowledge-building and public activities, together with the National Heritage Board's work, and currently sees no grounds for pronouncements, though it will follow the issues closely.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 6 (S)
The Social Democrats point out that the reform introducing free admission to state museums has made it possible for more groups, including low-income families with children, to take part in cultural heritage, and that free admission is also an important tool for integration, and want the government to work toward extending free admission to more museums over time.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 6 by S.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have gone the other way
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: LLiberalerna, VVänsterpartiet
Ja 130–93Nej 95–128
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Yes 21/0/0/3 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| S | No | No 0/93/0/14 | match | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| MP | No | Abstain 0/0/15/3 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| C | No | Yes 21/0/0/3 | differs | confidence: low | not addressed |
| L | No | Yes 14/0/0/2 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| KD | No | Yes 16/0/0/3 | differs | confidence: low | not addressed |
| M | Yes | Yes 58/0/0/10 | match | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| SD | Yes | Abstain 0/0/64/9 | differs | confidence: low | not addressed |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2022/23:986 by Runar Filper et al. (SD) demands 1-5 and 7, 2022/23:995 by Runar Filper et al. (SD) demands 1 and 2, 2022/23:1904 by Sten Bergheden (M), 2022/23:2054 by Lawen Redar et al. (S) demand 19 and 2022/23:2282 by Amanda Lind et al. (MP) demands 1 and 6.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2022/23:986 av Runar Filper m.fl. (SD) yrkandena 1-5 och 7, 2022/23:995 av Runar Filper m.fl. (SD) yrkandena 1 och 2, 2022/23:1904 av Sten Bergheden (M), 2022/23:2054 av Lawen Redar m.fl. (S) yrkande 19 och 2022/23:2282 av Amanda Lind m.fl. (MP) yrkandena 1 och 6.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag rejected 80 proposals in motions submitted during the general motion period 2022, mainly citing ongoing work and completed initiatives. The proposals concern, among other things, ancient monuments and monument preservation, management of valuable cultural environments, museum matters, intangible cultural heritage, digitalization of cultural heritage, archives and national minorities' cultural heritage.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants the government to cherish, promote and develop Sweden's cultural environments. (S) — Reservation 6
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan establishes that everyone shall have equal rights and opportunities to participate in cultural life and that culture can prevent segregation and class differences.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that everyone shall have equal rights and opportunities to participate in cultural life and that culture can prevent segregation and class differences. It explicitly criticizes that culture is impoverished when fees rise and supply shrinks. Free admission to more museums, which allows low-income families to participate in the cultural heritage, is therefore a measure in the plan's direction.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att alla ska ha samma rätt och möjlighet att ta del av kulturlivet och att kulturen kan motverka segregation och klasskillnader. Den kritiserar uttryckligen att kulturen utarmas när avgifter stiger och utbudet krymper. Fri entré på fler museer, som gör att låginkomstfamiljer kan ta del av kulturarvet, är därför en åtgärd i planens riktning.
- equal access to culturedecisive»Alla ska ha samma rätt och möjlighet att utöva kultur och att ta del« (party programme ↗)“Everyone shall have equal rights and opportunities to practise culture and to participate”
- culture against class differences»Kulturen kan spegla samhället, motverka segregation och klasskillnader« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Culture can reflect society, prevent segregation and class differences”
- culture as welfare»Kulturen spelar en viktig roll och är en del av välfärden« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Culture plays an important role and is part of welfare”
- fees exclude»Även kulturen och idrotten har utarmats när skolbibliotek läggs ned, simskolan blivit dyrare och biografer finns på färre orter« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Even culture and sports have been impoverished when school libraries close, swimming lessons become more expensive, and cinemas exist in fewer places”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan bases culture policy on making art's forms of expression accessible to all across the country and ensuring that fees do not exclude those with small resources; libraries shall be free.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan bases culture policy on making art's forms of expression accessible to all across the country and ensuring that fees do not exclude those with small resources; libraries shall be free. It additionally wants to make special investments in underprivileged areas and establishes that parents' wallet shall not determine access to culture. Free admission to more museums follows from these commitments.
Original (Swedish)
Planen bygger kulturpolitiken på att göra konstens uttrycksformer tillgängliga för alla i hela landet och att avgifter inte ska stänga ut dem med små resurser; biblioteken ska vara avgiftsfria. Den vill dessutom göra särskilda satsningar i resurssvaga områden och slår fast att föräldrarnas plånbok inte ska avgöra tillgången till kultur. Fri entré på fler museer följer av dessa åtaganden.
- culture accessible to alldecisive»konstens olika uttrycksformer tillgängliga för alla, barn och vuxna, i hela landet.« (party programme ↗)“art's various forms of expression accessible to all, children and adults, across the country.”
- free access to culture»Biblioteken ska vara avgiftsfria. Musikskolor och kulturskolor« (party programme ↗)“Libraries shall be free. Music schools and culture schools”
- the wallet shall not decide»Tillgången till fritidsaktiviteter till rimliga kostnader, både vad gäller idrott och kultur, behöver öka. Föräldrarnas plånbok ska inte avgöra.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Access to leisure activities at reasonable costs, both for sport and culture, needs to increase. Parents' wallet shall not decide.”
- investments in underprivileged areas»Vi vill stärka kulturskolan för att säkra alla barns möjligheter till kulturella aktiviteter, och genomföra särskilda satsningar i resurssvaga områden.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to strengthen culture schools to ensure all children's access to cultural activities, and implement special investments in underprivileged areas.”
The plan establishes that culture shall be accessible to all and that everyone shall be able to participate in culture on equal terms, and it uses free access as a tool when it requires free library loans.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that culture shall be accessible to all and that everyone shall be able to participate in culture on equal terms, and it uses free access as a tool when it requires free library loans. State cultural institutions shall also make their activities accessible throughout the country. Free entry to more museums follows from these commitments, even though the measure is not mentioned.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att kulturen ska vara tillgänglig för alla och att alla ska kunna ta del av kultur på jämlika villkor, och den använder avgiftsfrihet som verktyg när den kräver gratis boklån. De statliga kulturinstitutionerna ska dessutom tillgängliggöra sin verksamhet i hela landet. Fri entré på fler museer följer av dessa åtaganden, även om åtgärden inte nämns.
- culture accessible to alldecisive»Kulturen ska vara tillgänglig för alla« (party programme ↗)“Culture shall be accessible to all”
- equal terms for culture»utöva och ta del av kultur på jämlika villkor« (party programme ↗)“exercise and participate in culture on equal terms”
- free access to culture»och andra medier ska vara avgiftsfria« (party programme ↗)“and other media shall be free of charge”
- state institutions throughout the country»ha ett tydligt uppdrag att tillgängliggöra sin« (party programme ↗)“have a clear mission to make their”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan establishes that policy's task is to create conditions for everyone to participate in cultural life and that everyone, regardless of social background and residence, should have access to cultural values.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that policy's task is to create conditions for everyone to participate in cultural life and that everyone, regardless of social background and residence, should have access to cultural values. Free admission lowers precisely the economic threshold for low-income families and thus supports the plan's purpose. The plan however takes no position on admission fees and instead emphasises spreading state cultural activities, hence the conclusion is uncertain.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att politikens uppgift är att skapa förutsättningar för alla att delta i kulturlivet och att alla, oberoende av social bakgrund och bostadsort, ska få tillgång till kulturvärden. Fri entré sänker just den ekonomiska tröskeln för låginkomstfamiljer och stödjer därmed planens syfte. Planen tar dock inte ställning till entréavgifter och betonar i stället spridning av statlig kulturverksamhet, varför slutsatsen är osäker.
- everyone's participation in cultural lifedecisive»Politiken ska fokusera på att skapa förutsättningar för alla att delta i kulturlivet.« (party programme ↗)“Policy shall focus on creating conditions for everyone to participate in cultural life.”
- access regardless of background»en chans att få tillgång till kulturvärden och skapande« (party programme ↗)“a chance to access cultural values and creativity”
- culture as participation»Kulturupplevelser är en grundläggande del av människors självförverkligande och delaktighet i samhället« (party programme ↗)“Cultural experiences are a fundamental part of people's self-realisation and participation in society”
- spreading rather than free admission»Statliga kulturinstitutioner ska sprida sin verksamhet i hela landet.« (party programme ↗)“State cultural institutions shall spread their activities across the country.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan explicitly establishes that state museums shall have free admission and that museums' role as educational institutions shall be strengthened.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan explicitly establishes that state museums shall have free admission and that museums' role as educational institutions shall be strengthened. It also sees cost-free access to literature and culture as central and wants the public to increase culture's accessibility for the entire population. The counter-proposal's demands for free admission to more museums is thus the plan's own line.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår uttryckligen fast att statliga museer ska ha fri entré och att museernas roll som bildningsinstitutioner ska stärkas. Den ser också kostnadsfri tillgång till litteratur och kultur som central och vill att det offentliga ökar kulturens tillgänglighet för hela befolkningen. Motförslagets krav på fri entré på fler museer är därmed planens egen linje.
- free admission to state museumsdecisive»Museernas roll som bildningsinstitutioner och deras forskningsanknytning ska stärkas. Statliga museer ska ha« (party programme ↗)“Museums' role as educational institutions and their research connection shall be strengthened. State museums shall have”
- cost-free access to culture»Biblioteken har en central roll för att alla ska ha kostnadsfri tillgång till litteratur och annan kultur« (party programme ↗)“Libraries have a central role for everyone to have cost-free access to literature and other culture”
- increased accessibility to culture»Det offentliga ska på alla nivåer gynna mångfalden av kulturuttryck« (party programme ↗)“The public shall at all levels favour the diversity of cultural expression”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The party programme requires that the public actively contributes to culture reaching the citizens and that the valuable cultural heritage is preserved, with the state responsible for a cultural infrastructure across the country.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme requires that the public actively contributes to culture reaching the citizens and that the valuable cultural heritage is preserved, with the state responsible for a cultural infrastructure across the country. Free admission that allows more groups to share in the common cultural heritage aligns with this. The plan does not mention admission fees, and the requirement for restraint in public spending makes the support weak.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet kräver att det offentliga aktivt bidrar till att kulturen kommer medborgarna till del och att det värdefulla kulturarvet tas tillvara, med staten ansvarig för en kulturell infrastruktur i hela landet. Fri entré som gör att fler grupper kan ta del av det gemensamma kulturarvet ligger i linje med detta. Planen nämner inte entréavgifter, och kravet på återhållsamhet i de offentliga utgifterna gör stödet svagt.
- culture shall reach the citizensdecisive»Det offentliga ska inte bara garantera kulturell frihet, utan också aktivt bidra till att kulturen kommer medborgarna till del.« (party programme ↗)“The public shall not only guarantee cultural freedom, but also actively contribute to culture reaching the citizens.”
- stewardship of cultural heritage»En god kulturpolitik måste sträva efter att ta tillvara det värdefulla kulturella arv som tidigare generationer har lämnat efter sig.« (party programme ↗)“A good cultural policy must strive to preserve the valuable cultural heritage that previous generations have left behind.”
- public cultural infrastructure»Staten ska ansvara för det som brukar benämnas en kulturell infrastruktur, i hela landet.« (party programme ↗)“The state shall be responsible for what is usually called a cultural infrastructure, across the country.”
- restraint in spending»Sparandet i den svenska ekonomin måste hållas högt genom hushållssparande och genom återhållsamhet i de offentliga utgifterna.« (party programme ↗)“Savings in the Swedish economy must be kept high through household savings and through restraint in public spending.”
flags: citat_migrerat
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan has no commitment to free admission to museums, and all new reforms must be financed or fit within the surplus target with clear priorities for the legal system, defense, and welfare.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan has no commitment to free admission to museums, and all new reforms must be financed or fit within the surplus target with clear priorities for the legal system, defense, and welfare. The plan's integration tools are also the Swedish language, the quality of teaching and employment, not subsidized museum visits. Therefore, the plan does not support the demand for free admission to more museums.
Original (Swedish)
Planen har inget åtagande om fri entré på museer, och alla nya reformer måste finansieras eller rymmas inom överskottsmålet med tydliga prioriteringar till rättsväsende, försvar och välfärd. Planens integrationsverktyg är dessutom svenska språket, undervisningens kvalitet och arbete, inte subventionerade museibesök. Därför bär planen inte kravet på fri entré på fler museer.
- financed reformsdecisive»Alla nya löften och reformer – som till exempel våra inkomstskattesänkningar – behöver finansieras eller rymmas inom överskottsmålet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“All new promises and reforms – such as our income tax cuts – need to be financed or fit within the surplus target.”
- language and school break segregation»De enskilt viktigaste åtgärderna för att bryta segregationen handlar om kvaliteten i undervisningen och det svenska språket.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The most important measures to break segregation are about the quality of teaching and the Swedish language.”
- political prioritization»Politiken har en viktig uppgift att prioritera och välja bort« (party programme ↗)“Politics has an important task to prioritize and rule out”
- reforms can wait»Vi vet vad som måste göras – och vad som får vänta.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We know what needs to be done – and what can wait.”
The counter-proposal motivates free admission primarily as an integration-creating measure, and the plan is explicitly critical of multi-billion-krona initiatives on integration projects without evidence-based results and demands clear citizen benefit for every public initiative.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The counter-proposal motivates free admission primarily as an integration-creating measure, and the plan is explicitly critical of multi-billion-krona initiatives on integration projects without evidence-based results and demands clear citizen benefit for every public initiative. The plan wishes to value and show Swedish culture, but without building out general subsidies, so it does not support expanded free admission. The plan says nothing about the committee's reasons that museum law and authority guidance already suffice.
Original (Swedish)
Motförslaget motiverar fri entré främst som en integrationsskapande åtgärd, och planen är uttryckligt kritisk till mångmiljardsatsningar på integrationsprojekt utan evidensbaserade resultat och kräver tydlig medborgarnytta för varje offentlig satsning. Planen vill värna och visa svensk kultur, men utan att bygga ut generella subventioner, varför den inte stöder utvidgad fri entré. Planen säger inget om utskottets skäl att museilagen och myndighetsvägledning redan räcker.
- integration initiatives without evidencedecisive»Subventioner av anställningar, elcyklar och lyxbilar sker precis som mångmiljardsatsningar i integrationsprojekt helt utan evidensbaserade resultat.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Subsidies for employment, e-bikes and luxury cars occur, just as multi-billion initiatives in integration projects, entirely without evidence-based results.”
- result requirements on initiatives»Begära tydliga resultat för varje offentlig satsning« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Demand clear results for every public initiative”
- spending on welfare's core»Sverigedemokraterna vill koncentrera de offentliga utgifterna till välfärdens hjärta och begära tydlig medborgarnytta för alla satsningar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden Democrats wish to concentrate public spending to the heart of welfare and demand clear citizen benefit for all initiatives.”
- value and show Swedish culture»Sverigedemokraterna vill värna, vårda och visa svensk kultur.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden Democrats wish to value, care for and show Swedish culture.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2022/23:KrU6)
- Committee report full text (HA01KrU6)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2022/23:1003 — Sverigevänlig konsumentpolitik av Mikael Eskilandersson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2022/23:1015 — En konkurrenskraftig svensk sjöfart av Jimmy Ståhl m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2022/23:1019 — Svenskt kulturarvsår av Runar Filper m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2022/23:1021 — Uppåkra Arkeologiska Center av Björn Söder m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2022/23:1140 — Konservering av fornminnen för framtida generationer av David Perez (SD)
- Motion 2022/23:1181 — Den kyrkoantikvariska ersättningen av Inga-Lill Sjöblom och Ardalan Shekarabi (båda S)
- Motion 2022/23:1219 — Förvaltning av fäbodmiljöer av Aron Emilsson (SD)
- Motion 2022/23:1419 — Tillgängliggörande av bortglömda byggnader av historisk betydelse av Michael Rubbestad (SD)
- Motion 2022/23:1496 — Syrisk-ortodoxa kloster och kyrkor i Turkiet av Yusuf Aydin (KD)
- Motion 2022/23:1527 — Finnskogen som världsarv av Kjell-Arne Ottosson (KD)
- Motion 2022/23:1549 — En översyn av kulturhistoriska platser med större allmänt intresse av Per-Arne Håkansson (S)
- Motion 2022/23:1583 — Ett Raoul Wallenbergcentrum/-museum av Magnus Oscarsson (KD)
- Motion 2022/23:1664 — Regelverket för användandet av metallsökare av Mattias Bäckström Johansson och Eric Palmqvist (båda SD)
- Motion 2022/23:1737 — Minnesmonument över folkmordet i Srebrenica av Laila Naraghi (S)
- Motion 2022/23:1811 — Bekämpning av terrorism av Christian Carlsson (KD)
- Motion 2022/23:1819 — Kostnaden för arkeologiska undersökningar av Sten Bergheden (M)
- Motion 2022/23:1881 — Konstitutionella frågor av Malin Björk m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2022/23:1904 — Samhällets stöd och uppmuntran till landets samlare av Sten Bergheden (M)
- Motion 2022/23:2054 — Utgiftsområde 17 Kultur, medier, trossamfund, fritid av Lawen Redar m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2022/23:2098 — Politik för det samiska folket av Amanda Lind m.fl. (MP)
Source: The Swedish Parliament