2026-02-172025/26:KU22 · p.18KUConstitution

The status of Älvdalska

The status of Elfdalian as a minority or regional language

What's at stake: Around 3,000 speakers in Älvdalen are affected by whether their language receives formal recognition and stronger protection, which could affect the prospects for passing Elfdalian on to future generations.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

Whether the government should investigate the status of Elfdalian with a view to recognising it as a minority or regional language, or whether its current classification as a dialect should stand without a new inquiry.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The Committee rejects the motions and does not consider that parliament should take the initiative for an inquiry into the status of Elfdalian. At the same time, the Committee sees great value in preserving Elfdalian as part of Sweden's cultural heritage and welcomes the state and municipal efforts already under way.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 25 (S, V, C, MP)

S, V, C and MP consider that Elfdalian carries ancient features and is spoken today by up to 3,000 people, mainly in the parish of Älvdalen. Experts and the Council of Europe's expert committee have called for a review of its status. The parties want the government to be tasked with investigating the status of Elfdalian and the possibility of recognising it as a minority or regional language.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 25 by S, V, C, MP.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
Vown reservationNoNo 0/19/0/3follows the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
Sown reservationNoNo 0/91/0/15follows the planconfidence: lowderived
MPown reservationNoNo 0/16/0/2follows the planconfidence: highexplicit
Cown reservationNoNo 0/21/0/3follows the planconfidence: mediumderived
LNoYes 14/0/0/2departs from the planconfidence: lowderived
KDNoYes 17/0/0/2departs from the planconfidence: lowderived
MNoYes 59/0/0/9departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed
SDNoYes 62/0/0/9departs from the planconfidence: mediumderived

Committee proposal

Parliament rejects the motions 2025/26:1333 by Runar Filper (SD), 2025/26:2786 by Nooshi Dadgostar et al. (V) item 21, 2025/26:3036 by Malin Höglund (M), 2025/26:3583 by Muharrem Demirok et al. (C) item 31, 2025/26:3721 by Jennie Nilsson et al. (S) item 27 and 2025/26:3775 by Amanda Lind et al. (MP) item 23.

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2025/26:1333 av Runar Filper (SD), 2025/26:2786 av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V) yrkande 21, 2025/26:3036 av Malin Höglund (M), 2025/26:3583 av Muharrem Demirok m.fl. (C) yrkande 31, 2025/26:3721 av Jennie Nilsson m.fl. (S) yrkande 27 och 2025/26:3775 av Amanda Lind m.fl. (MP) yrkande 23.

Riksdag decision: Parliament rejected 63 proposals in motions on minority issues from the general motion period of 2025. The proposals deal with, among other things, indigenous status for Tornedalians, Kvens and Lantalaiset, Sámi rights to land and water, Jewish life in Sweden, Roma inclusion, a truth commission for Swedish Finns, various measures to strengthen and make visible the national minorities, oversight and monitoring of minority policy, and the status of Älvdalska. Parliament refers, among other things, to the fact that work is already underway in the areas covered by the proposals.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietNoNofollows the plannot addressed

The plan gives Sweden a special responsibility to strengthen indigenous people's and national minorities' rights to identity, language and cultural heritage, seen in light of the state's historical injustices.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan gives Sweden a special responsibility to strengthen indigenous people's and national minorities' rights to identity, language and cultural heritage, seen in light of the state's historical injustices. An investigation into Älvdalen's status and the possibility of recognizing it as a minority or regional language is an application of that commitment. The plan does not mention Älvdalen, so the position is derived.

Original (Swedish)

Planen ger Sverige en särskild uppgift att stärka urfolks och de nationella minoriteternas rättigheter till identitet, språk och kulturarv, sett i ljuset av statens historiska oförrätter. En utredning av älvdalskans status och möjligheten att erkänna den som minoritets- eller landsdelsspråk är en tillämpning av det åtagandet. Planen nämner inte älvdalskan, så ställningstagandet är härlett.

  • minorities' language rightsdecisive»de nationella minoriteternas rättigheter till identitet, språk, kulturarv« (party programme ↗)“national minorities' rights to identity, language, cultural heritage”
  • special responsibility for minorities»Sverige har en särskild uppgift att stärka urfolks och« (party programme ↗)“Sweden has a special responsibility to strengthen indigenous peoples and”
  • historical injustices»Den svenska staten har genom historien utsatt urfolk och nationella« (party programme ↗)“The Swedish state has throughout history subjected indigenous peoples and national”
SSocialdemokraternaNoNofollows the planderived

The plan says nothing about Älvdal or about which languages should be recognized.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan says nothing about Älvdal or about which languages should be recognized. The closest principle is the commitment to bring to life the Swedish cultural heritage and to cherish cultural diversity across linguistic and cultural boundaries. An investigation of Älvdal's status is a limited measure that points in that direction, but the position is entirely derived.

Original (Swedish)

Planen säger ingenting om älvdalskan eller om vilka språk som bör erkännas. Den närmast liggande principen är åtagandet att levandegöra det svenska kulturarvet och att värna kulturell mångfald över språkliga och kulturella gränser. En utredning av älvdalskans status är en begränsad åtgärd som ligger i den riktningen, men ställningstagandet är helt härlett.

  • living cultural heritagedecisive»Levandegörande av det svenska kultur- och världsarvet.« (party programme ↗)“Bringing to life the Swedish cultural and world heritage.”
  • linguistic and cultural diversity»Kulturell mångfald med aktivt utbyte över språkliga, nationella och kulturella gränser.« (party programme ↗)“Cultural diversity with active exchange across linguistic, national and cultural boundaries.”
  • minorities' rights»Rättigheter för nationella minoriteter.« (party programme ↗)“Rights for national minorities.”
MPMiljöpartietNoNofollows the planexplicit

The plan explicitly states that Älvdalen shall be recognized as a minority language or regional language.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan explicitly states that Älvdalen shall be recognized as a minority language or regional language. An investigation of Älvdalen's status and the possibility of such recognition is exactly the step that the plan's commitment requires. The plan also establishes that minority languages shall be preserved and developed and that the rights of minorities shall be strengthened.

Original (Swedish)

Planen säger uttryckligen att älvdalskan ska erkännas som ett minoritets- eller landsdelsspråk. En utredning av älvdalskans status och möjligheten till ett sådant erkännande är exakt det steg som planens åtagande kräver. Planen slår också fast att minoritetsspråken ska bevaras och utvecklas och att minoriteternas rättigheter ska stärkas.

  • recognize Älvdalen as a languagedecisive»Vidare ska älvdalskan erkännas som ett« (party programme ↗)“Furthermore, Älvdalen shall be recognized as a”
  • minority languages shall be preserved»De fem erkända nationella minoritetsspråken: finska, jiddisch, meänkieli, romani chib« (party programme ↗)“The five recognized national minority languages: Finnish, Yiddish, Meänkieli, Romani Chib”
  • strengthened minority rights»stärka nationella minoriteters och urfolket samernas rättigheter« (2022 manifesto ↗)“strengthen the rights of national minorities and the indigenous Sámi people”
CCenterpartietNoNofollows the planderived

The election manifesto commits to strengthening minority protection and minority language status, which bears the counter-proposal's demand for an investigation of Älvdalskan's status and the possibility of recognising it as a minority or regional language.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The election manifesto commits to strengthening minority protection and minority language status, which bears the counter-proposal's demand for an investigation of Älvdalskan's status and the possibility of recognising it as a minority or regional language. The party programme additionally highlights the task of cultivating and developing cultural heritage and that culture should exist across the country, which supports an ancient dialect being given clearer protection. Älvdalskan not being named makes the conclusion inferred.

Original (Swedish)

Valmanifestet åtar sig att stärka minoritetsskyddet och minoritetsspråkens ställning, vilket bär motförslagets krav på en utredning av älvdalskans status och möjligheten att erkänna den som minoritets- eller landsdelsspråk. Partiprogrammet lyfter dessutom uppgiften att vårda och utveckla kulturarvet och att kultur ska finnas i hela landet, vilket talar för att ett uråldrigt bygdespråk ges ett tydligare skydd. Att älvdalskan inte nämns vid namn gör slutsatsen härledd.

  • strengthened status for minority languagesdecisive»Vi vill stärka bland annat äganderätten, diskrimineringsförbudet, minoritetsskyddet och minoritetsspråkens ställning« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to strengthen among other things property rights, the discrimination ban, minority protection, and minority language status”
  • care for cultural heritage»till att vårda och utveckla ett kulturarv« (party programme ↗)“to care for and develop a cultural heritage”
  • culture across the country»Att tillhandahålla kultur i hela landet är en viktig utgångspunkt för Centerpartiet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“For the Centre Party, providing culture across the country is an important starting point.”
  • power close to rural areas»Decentralisera mera. Människor ska få bestämma mer själva, och politiska beslut ska fattas nära dem som berörs.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Decentralise more. People should decide more themselves and political decisions should be taken close to those affected.”
LLiberalernaNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The plan mentions neither Älvdalska nor the question of new minority languages.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan mentions neither Älvdalska nor the question of new minority languages. The closest principle is that cultural heritage, explicitly including traditions and dialects, shall be kept accessible for future generations and that the public shall support supply with minority language profile. This speaks for investigating the status of Älvdalska, even though the plan only lists the five existing national minorities.

Original (Swedish)

Planen nämner varken älvdalskan eller frågan om nya minoritetsspråk. Närmast liggande princip är att kulturarvet, uttryckligen inklusive traditioner och dialekter, ska hållas tillgängligt för kommande generationer och att det offentliga ska understödja ett utbud med minoritetsspråksprofil. Det talar för att utreda älvdalskans status, även om planen bara räknar upp de fem befintliga nationella minoriteterna.

  • dialects are cultural heritagedecisive»Kulturarvet – vårt gemensamma minne i form av historiska lämningar, kulturlandskap, arkiv, traditioner, dialekter och annat – utvecklas ständigt genom att samtiden ger sitt bidrag.« (party programme ↗)“Cultural heritage – our collective memory in the form of historical remains, cultural landscapes, archives, traditions, dialects and other – constantly develops as our time contributes.”
  • preserve cultural heritage»Det kulturarv som finns i Sverige är en del av mänsklighetens gemensamma kulturarv och ska hållas tillgängligt för kommande generationer.« (party programme ↗)“The cultural heritage that exists in Sweden is part of humanity's shared cultural heritage and shall be kept accessible for future generations.”
  • support for minority languages»Det offentliga ska understödja ett språk-, kultur- och medieutbud med minoritetsspråksprofil.« (party programme ↗)“The public shall support supply of language, culture and media with minority language profile.”
  • existing national minorities»Samernas, sverigefinnarnas, tornedalingarnas, judarnas och romernas ställning som nationella minoriteter och samernas ställning som urfolk ska upprätthållas.« (party programme ↗)“The position of the Sámi, Swedish Finns, Tornedalians, Jews and Roma as national minorities and the Sámi's position as indigenous people shall be maintained.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

KDKristdemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The party programme establishes that preserving the cultural heritage left behind by previous generations is a cultural policy task, and counts among this also the customs and practices that have grown up through history.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The party programme establishes that preserving the cultural heritage left behind by previous generations is a cultural policy task, and counts among this also the customs and practices that have grown up through history. Investigating the status of älvdalska and the possibility of recognizing it as a minority or regional language is a way to steward such a heritage, in line with minority languages being ensured a strong position through legislation. The demand is supported, although without direct support in the text about älvdalska.

Original (Swedish)

Partiprogrammet gör det till en kulturpolitisk uppgift att ta tillvara det kulturella arv tidigare generationer lämnat efter sig, och räknar dit även de seder och bruk som vuxit fram genom historien. Att utreda älvdalskans status och möjligheten att erkänna den som minoritets- eller landsdelsspråk är ett sätt att förvalta ett sådant arv, i linje med att minoritetsspråk bör tillförsäkras en stark ställning genom lagstiftning. Kravet stöds, om än utan direkt stöd i texten om älvdalskan.

  • steward the cultural heritagedecisive»En god kulturpolitik måste sträva efter att ta tillvara det värdefulla kulturella arv som tidigare generationer har lämnat efter sig.« (party programme ↗)“A good cultural policy must strive to preserve the valuable cultural heritage that previous generations have left behind.”
  • stewardship of customs and practices»Detta förvaltarskap omfattar det materiella kulturarv som vi ser i form av till exempel kulturhistorisk bebyggelse, fornlämningar och föremål men även de seder och bruk som vuxit fram genom historien.« (party programme ↗)“This stewardship encompasses the material cultural heritage that we see in the form of, for example, culturally historic buildings, archaeological remains and objects but also the customs and practices that have grown up through history.”
  • statutory position for minority languages»Ett sätt att göra detta är att tillförsäkra minoritetsspråken en stark ställning genom lagstiftning.« (party programme ↗)“One way to do this is to ensure minority languages a strong position through legislation.”
  • minorities' interests are considered»Det är viktigt att dessa gruppers behov och intressen beaktas i alla delar av landet och på alla nivåer i den offentliga sektorn.« (party programme ↗)“It is important that these groups' needs and interests are considered in all parts of the country and at all levels in the public sector.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MModeraternaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan says nothing about Älvdalian or language status issues.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan says nothing about Älvdalian or language status issues. The closest related principle is that the Moderate Party values the continuity that Sweden as a nation represents and sees Swedish culture and history as something that unites across generations; an ancient indigenous language is part of that heritage. An investigation of its status is moreover a limited measure that does not tie up any resources in itself. The foundation is however weak.

Original (Swedish)

Planen säger inget om älvdalskan eller om språkstatusfrågor. Närmast liggande princip är att Moderaterna värdesätter den kontinuitet som Sverige som nation representerar och ser svensk kultur och historia som något som förenar över generationerna; ett uråldrigt inhemskt språk är en del av det arvet. En utredning av statusen är dessutom en begränsad åtgärd som inte binder upp några resurser i sig. Underlaget är dock svagt.

  • value cultural continuitydecisive»Moderaterna värdesätter den kontinuitet som Sverige« (party programme ↗)“The Moderate Party values the continuity that Sweden”
  • Swedish cultural heritage»Svensk kultur och svensk historia« (party programme ↗)“Swedish culture and Swedish history”
  • free and diverse cultural life»Fria medier och ett fritt kulturliv är fundament i ett pluralistiskt« (party programme ↗)“Free media and free cultural life are foundations in a pluralistic”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

SDSverigedemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The plan wishes to value, care for and show Swedish culture and emphasizes that language and dialects have developed organically over time and geography as part of cultural heritage.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan wishes to value, care for and show Swedish culture and emphasizes that language and dialects have developed organically over time and geography as part of cultural heritage. Älvdalskan is precisely such a deeply rooted linguistic heritage with local anchorage. An investigation of its status therefore aligns with the plan's commitment to respect for cultural heritage and a policy for the whole of Sweden.

Original (Swedish)

Planen vill värna, vårda och visa svensk kultur och betonar att språk och dialekter utvecklats organiskt över tid och geografi som en del av kulturarvet. Älvdalskan är just ett sådant djupt förankrat språkligt arv med lokal förankring. En utredning av dess status ligger därför i linje med planens åtagande om respekt för det kulturella arvet och en politik för hela Sverige.

  • value Swedish culturedecisive»Sverigedemokraterna vill värna, vårda och visa svensk kultur.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden Democrats wish to value, care for and show Swedish culture.”
  • language and dialects as cultural heritage»Kulturen liksom språk och dialekter utvecklas organiskt, över tid, mellan generationer och över geografi.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Culture like language and dialects develop organically, over time, between generations and across geography.”
  • respect for cultural heritage»Sammanhållningen och tilliten i samhället ska återupprättas, med en gemensam stolthet och respekt för det kulturella arvet, sociala koder, svensk demokrati och det sekulariserade samhället som har sina rötter i en kristen idégrund.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Cohesion and trust in society shall be restored, with shared pride and respect for cultural heritage, social codes, Swedish democracy and the secularized society that has its roots in a Christian ideological foundation.”
  • policy for the whole of Sweden»Bedriva en politik för hela Sverige« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Conduct a policy for the whole of Sweden”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament