2025-01-222024/25:NU4 · p.6NUBusiness & energy

Lernia AB

Lernia AB's divestment mandate and social mission

What's at stake: If the authorization is revoked, Lernia could be given a clearer role in skills provision and industrial transition in regions with major recruitment needs, whereas keeping the authorization means a sale of the company remains possible.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

The question is whether the Riksdag's authorization to sell the state's shares in Lernia should be revoked and the company instead given a social mission focused on skills-shortage occupations, or whether the existing authorization to sell the company should remain in place.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The committee rejects the motions calling for revoking the authorization to sell Lernia and giving the company a social mission focused on skills-shortage occupations, and does not want to change the existing authorization.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 10 (S)

The reservation holds that Lernia should not be divested since the company could become an important player in the green transition, and wants it instead given a social mission focused on skills-shortage occupations requiring vocational training, especially in regions with major skills needs; the Riksdag should therefore revoke the authorization to sell Lernia.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 10 by S.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
VNoYes 21/0/0/3departs from the planconfidence: highnot addressed
Sown reservationNoNo 0/93/0/13follows the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
MPNoYes 16/0/0/2departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
CYesYes 21/0/0/3follows the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
LYesYes 14/0/0/2follows the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
KDYesYes 17/0/0/2follows the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
MYesYes 60/0/0/8follows the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
SDNoAbstain 0/0/63/9departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed

Committee proposal

The Riksdag rejects the motions 2024/25:509 from Fredrik Olovsson et al. (S) demand 3 and 2024/25:1453 from Tobias Andersson et al. (SD) demand 5.

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2024/25:509 av Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S) yrkande 3 och 2024/25:1453 av Tobias Andersson m.fl. (SD) yrkande 5.

Riksdag decision: The Riksdag has addressed the government's letter concerning the 2024 Account for State-Owned Enterprises. The letter contains the activity report for the enterprises in the state's corporate portfolio. It is important that the government annually submits its letter so that the Riksdag can monitor developments in the corporate portfolio. The Riksdag also wishes the government to continue developing the content of the letter so that a clear picture of developments in the state-owned enterprises is obtained. The Riksdag filed the letter to the records, meaning the matter was concluded. The Riksdag also decided to reject approximately 60 proposals in motions concerning the state's ownership and management of enterprises. Of these, approximately 40 proposals were submitted during the general motion period 2024.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The election manifesto requires that socially important activities are taken back into common ownership and that massive investments are made in transition support and skills development so that workers are not hit by unemployment when industry transitions.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The election manifesto requires that socially important activities are taken back into common ownership and that massive investments are made in transition support and skills development so that workers are not hit by unemployment when industry transitions. Recalling the authorization to sell the company and instead giving it a public mission in occupations with labour shortages responds directly to both these commitments.

Original (Swedish)

Valmanifestet kräver att samhällsviktig verksamhet tas tillbaka i gemensam ägo och att massiva satsningar görs på omställningsstöd och kompetensutveckling så att arbetare inte drabbas av arbetslöshet när industrin ställer om. Att återkalla bemyndigandet att sälja bolaget och i stället ge det ett samhällsuppdrag inom bristyrken svarar direkt mot båda dessa åtaganden.

  • investments in transition trainingdecisive»men för att kunna hantera de nya gröna jobben behövs massiva satsningar på omställningsstöd, kompetensutveckling och utbildning i vad hållbar samhällsutveckling innebär« (2022 manifesto ↗)“but to handle the new green jobs, massive investments are needed in transition support, skills development and education in what sustainable societal development means”
  • no sale of socially useful activities»Det är hög tid att agera och ta tillbaka den samhällsviktiga verksamhet och infrastruktur som har privatiserats.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It is high time to act and take back the socially important activities and infrastructure that have been privatised.”
  • security in transition»Arbetare, som idag är anställda i privata företag och offentlig verksamhet ska inte drabbas av arbetslöshet när samhället ställer om från fossilberoende.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Workers, who today are employed in private companies and public activities should not be hit by unemployment when society transitions from fossil dependency.”
  • state ownership as a tool»Gemensamt ägda verksamheter kan användas för att driva förändring« (party programme ↗)“Commonly-owned activities can be used to drive change”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

SSocialdemokraternaNoNofollows the plannot addressed

The election manifesto gives the state an explicit responsibility for competence provision and requires a stronger link between the supply of education and society's staffing needs.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The election manifesto gives the state an explicit responsibility for competence provision and requires a stronger link between the supply of education and society's staffing needs. Withdrawing the sales mandate and instead giving the company a societal mission in shortage occupations, in regions where industry's transition creates competence shortages, is in line with this and with the manifesto's promise of employment throughout the country through the transition. The plan does not mention the company, so the assessment is derived.

Original (Swedish)

Valmanifestet ger staten ett uttalat ansvar för kompetensförsörjningen och kräver en starkare koppling mellan utbildningarnas utbud och samhällets personalbehov. Att återkalla säljbemyndigandet och i stället ge bolaget ett samhällsuppdrag inom bristyrken, i regioner där industrins omställning skapar kompetensbrist, ligger i linje med detta och med manifestets löfte om jobb i hela landet genom omställningen. Planen nämner inte bolaget, varför bedömningen är härledd.

  • state responsibility for competence provisiondecisive»Staten har ett ansvar för att säkra kompetensförsörjningen, inte minst i välfärden.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The state has a responsibility to secure competence provision, not least in welfare.”
  • education according to labour market needs»Det ska finns en starkare koppling mellan de utbildningar som erbjuds och de behov av personal som finns i samhället.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“There shall be a stronger link between the education offered and the staffing needs that exist in society.”
  • employment through industry's transition»Det skapar tusentals jobb över hela landet här och nu – jobb med svenska löner och kollektivavtal.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It creates thousands of jobs across the country here and now – jobs with Swedish wages and collective agreements.”
  • investment in education»Vi vill satsa på grön teknik, digitalisering och utbildning så att företagsklimatet stärks och kompetensförsörjningen förbättras.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to invest in green technology, digitalization and education so that the business climate is strengthened and competence provision is improved.”
MPMiljöpartietNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The counter-proposal wants to keep the enterprise in state ownership and give it a public mission for shortage occupations in regions affected by industrial transition.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The counter-proposal wants to keep the enterprise in state ownership and give it a public mission for shortage occupations in regions affected by industrial transition. The plan sees state ownership as justified in certain cases, wants vocational training to be directed towards areas with large labour shortages and emphasizes that the green transition creates new competence requirements. The demand thus aligns with the plan's direction, but the plan does not mention any specific enterprise.

Original (Swedish)

Motförslaget vill behålla bolaget i statlig ägo och ge det ett samhällsuppdrag för bristyrken i regioner som påverkas av industrins omställning. Planen ser statligt ägande som motiverat i vissa fall, vill att yrkesutbildning riktas mot områden med stor arbetskraftsbrist och betonar att den gröna omställningen ställer nya kompetenskrav. Kravet ligger därmed i planens riktning, men planen nämner inget enskilt bolag.

  • vocational training for shortage occupationsdecisive»Yrkeshögskolan ska ge möjlighet till kvalificerade utbildningar inom områden där behovet av arbetskraft är stort.« (party programme ↗)“Vocational higher education shall provide access to qualified training in areas where the need for labour is large.”
  • competence for green transition»En viktig del av framtiden för svenskt näringsliv ligger i den gröna omställningen, som ställer nya krav på kompetens och arbetssätt.« (party programme ↗)“An important part of the future for Swedish business lies in the green transition, which creates new demands on competence and working methods.”
  • labour market throughout the country»Arbetsmarknadspolitiken ska verka för en väl fungerande arbetsmarknad i hela landet.« (party programme ↗)“Labour market policy shall promote a well-functioning labour market throughout the country.”
  • state ownership justified»I vissa fall kan det dock finnas skäl för staten eller en kommun att äga och driva affärsverksamheter.« (party programme ↗)“In certain cases there may however be reasons for the state or a municipality to own and operate business activities.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

CCenterpartietYesYesfollows the plannot addressed

The plan shares the goal of meeting the skills shortage and wants the education system to be based on labour market needs, but the means in the counter-proposal — keeping the company in state ownership and giving it a special public mandate — runs counter to the commitment to a market economy free from centrally planned directives and to the principle that public activities can be subject to competition.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan shares the goal of meeting the skills shortage and wants the education system to be based on labour market needs, but the means in the counter-proposal — keeping the company in state ownership and giving it a special public mandate — runs counter to the commitment to a market economy free from centrally planned directives and to the principle that public activities can be subject to competition. The plan therefore speaks against the requirement.

Original (Swedish)

Planen delar målet att möta kompetensbristen och vill att utbildningssystemet utgår från arbetsmarknadens behov, men medlet i motförslaget — att behålla bolaget i statlig ägo och ge det ett särskilt samhällsuppdrag — går emot åtagandet om en marknadsekonomi fri från planekonomiska pekpinnar och om att offentlig verksamhet kan konkurrensutsättas. Planen talar därför emot kravet.

  • competition-exposed public activitiesdecisive»Offentlig verksamhet kan med fördel konkurrensutsättas för att ge det privata näringslivet möjlighet att skapa« (party programme ↗)“Public activities can advantageously be subject to competition to give private enterprise the opportunity to create”
  • education tailored to labour market needs»Matchningen måste förbättras. Alla ska ha rätt till en effektiv matchningstjänst och det ska bli lättare att hitta medarbetare inom alla yrken. Utbildningssystemet behöver i betydligt större utsträckning utgå från arbetsmarknadens behov.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Matching must be improved. Everyone should have access to an effective matching service and it should be easier to find employees in all professions. The education system needs to a much greater extent be based on labour market needs.”
  • vocational training through businesses»Gör det enklare att anställa elever i yrkesprogram som lärlingar genom att stärka ersättningen för företagens kostnader förknippade med utbildningen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Make it easier to hire students in vocational programmes as apprentices by strengthening compensation for companies' training-related costs.”

flags: citat_blockerat

LLiberalernaYesYesfollows the plannot addressed

The party programme establishes that the public sector shall only conduct business activities if there is a strong public interest and shall not conduct activities that crowd out functioning private alternatives.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The party programme establishes that the public sector shall only conduct business activities if there is a strong public interest and shall not conduct activities that crowd out functioning private alternatives. To withdraw the sales authorisation and instead give the company a new public task goes in the opposite direction. The plan does want to expand vocational education in shortage occupations, but through vocational college and adult education rather than through a state-owned company.

Original (Swedish)

Partiprogrammet slår fast att det offentliga endast ska driva affärsverksamhet vid starkt samhällsintresse och inte verksamheter som tränger ut fungerande privata alternativ. Att återkalla försäljningsbemyndigandet och i stället ge bolaget ett nytt samhällsuppdrag går i motsatt riktning. Planen vill däremot bygga ut yrkesutbildning i bristyrken, men genom yrkeshögskola och vuxenutbildning snarare än genom ett statligt bolag.

  • only with strong public interestdecisive»Det offentliga ska endast driva affärsverksamhet om det finns ett starkt samhällsintresse.« (party programme ↗)“The public sector shall only conduct business activities if there is a strong public interest.”
  • not crowd out private alternatives»inte driva verksamheter som tränger ut fungerande privata alternativ« (party programme ↗)“not conduct activities that crowd out functioning private alternatives”
  • education in shortage occupations»kompletterande yrkesutbildningar i bristyrken samt en utbyggd yrkeshögskola med hög kvalitet.« (party programme ↗)“supplementary vocational education in shortage occupations and an expanded vocational college with high quality.”
  • public ownership shall be limited»Staten ska inte äga flygbolag, banker och telebolag.« (party programme ↗)“The state shall not own airlines, banks and telecommunications companies.”
KDKristdemokraternaYesYesfollows the plannot addressed

The plan wants personal ownership to be encouraged at the expense of institutional and that business policy be conducted with general means, while direct company subsidies are rejected.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan wants personal ownership to be encouraged at the expense of institutional and that business policy be conducted with general means, while direct company subsidies are rejected. Recalling the sales mandate and giving a state-owned company a targeted public mission goes against both these commitments. That the plan wants to see a developed apprenticeship system and a plurality of actors speaks for vocational education but not for state ownership.

Original (Swedish)

Planen vill att det personliga ägandet uppmuntras på bekostnad av det institutionella och att näringspolitiken bedrivs med generella medel, samtidigt som direkta företagssubventioner avvisas. Att återkalla försäljningsbemyndigandet och ge ett statligt bolag ett riktat samhällsuppdrag går emot båda dessa åtaganden. Att planen vill se ett utvecklat lärlingssystem och en mångfald av aktörer talar för yrkesutbildning men inte för statligt ägande.

  • personal ownership before institutionaldecisive»Det är också angeläget att det personliga ägandet uppmuntras på bekostnad av det institutionella ägandet.« (party programme ↗)“It is also important that personal ownership be encouraged at the expense of institutional ownership.”
  • general business policy»Näringspolitiken ska bedrivas med generella medel,« (party programme ↗)“Business policy should be conducted with general means,”
  • no targeted subsidies»Direkta företagssubventioner avvisas.« (party programme ↗)“Direct company subsidies are rejected.”
  • plurality of actors»bör finnas en mångfald av aktörer som agerar arbetsförmedlare.« (party programme ↗)“there should be a plurality of actors who act as employment agencies.”
MModeraternaYesYesfollows the plannot addressed

The counter-proposal wishes to withdraw a sale authorization and instead give a state-owned enterprise a new public mandate.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The counter-proposal wishes to withdraw a sale authorization and instead give a state-owned enterprise a new public mandate. This goes against the plan's line that the state should own and operate less – that which others can do equally well or better should not be performed by the public – and that state ownership should rather be divested. The plan's tool for skills supply is instead national coordination of education places, not expanded state enterprise mandates.

Original (Swedish)

Motförslaget vill dra tillbaka ett försäljningsbemyndigande och i stället ge ett statligt bolag ett nytt samhällsuppdrag. Det går emot planens linje att staten ska äga och driva mindre – det som andra kan göra lika bra eller bättre ska inte utföras av det offentliga – och att statligt ägande snarare ska avyttras. Planens verktyg för kompetensförsörjning är i stället nationell samordning av utbildningsplatser, inte utvidgade statliga bolagsuppdrag.

  • the state should not run operationsdecisive»Om något kan göras lika bra eller bättre av« (party programme ↗)“If something can be done equally well or better by”
  • divest state ownership»Sälja av en större andel av statliga Sveaskogs innehav till personer med regional anknytning« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sell off a larger share of state-owned Sveaskog holdings to people with regional connections”
  • coordination for skills supply»Få på plats en nationell samordning över samhällets behov av antalet utbildningsplatser för att förbättra kompetensförsörjningen« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Establish national coordination of society's need for the number of education places to improve skills supply”
  • limited state sphere»En stor stat leder till ett svagare samhälle.« (party programme ↗)“A large state leads to a weaker society.”
SDSverigedemokraternaNoAbstaindeparts from the plannot addressed

The election manifesto wishes education to take place according to the needs of the labour market and that the labour force supply better responds to companies' competence needs, with domestic workforce before labour migration.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The election manifesto wishes education to take place according to the needs of the labour market and that the labour force supply better responds to companies' competence needs, with domestic workforce before labour migration. A public assignment directed at occupations with shortages requiring vocational training aligns with that commitment, especially in regions where industrial transformation creates skills shortages. The plan's objection to ineffective labour market programmes applies to measures that hide unemployment, not vocational training against actual shortages.

Original (Swedish)

Valmanifestet vill att utbildning sker efter arbetsmarknadens behov och att arbetskraftsutbudet bättre svarar mot företagens kompetensbehov, med inhemsk arbetskraft före arbetskraftsinvandring. Ett samhällsuppdrag riktat mot bristyrken som kräver yrkesutbildning ligger i linje med det åtagandet, särskilt i regioner där industrins omställning skapar kompetensbrist. Planens invändning mot ineffektiva arbetsmarknadsprogram gäller åtgärder som döljer arbetslöshet, inte yrkesutbildning mot faktiska brister.

  • labour supply matching needsdecisive»Verka för ett arbetskraftsutbud som bättre svarar mot behoven på arbetsmarknaden« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Work for a labour force supply that better responds to labour market needs”
  • education matching labour market needs»Utbilda efter de behov som finns på arbetsmarknaden« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Educate according to the needs that exist on the labour market”
  • domestic workforce first»Stoppa arbetskraftsinvandring till yrken som kan tillgodoses av inhemsk arbetskraft« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Stop labour migration to occupations that can be filled by the domestic workforce”
  • no ineffective programmes»Avskaffa ineffektiva arbetsmarknads- och integrationsprogram som är skapade för att dölja arbetslöshet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Abolish ineffective labour market and integration programmes created to hide unemployment”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament