2022-11-232022/23:FiU7 · p.1FiUEconomy & finance
Sweden's implementation of Agenda 2030
How Sweden's implementation of Agenda 2030 is to be steered
What's at stake: Agenda 2030 shapes how Sweden pursues social, economic and environmental goals. Clearer roles and new requirements would affect regions and municipalities in their planning, and companies that would then have to manage and report human rights and environmental risks in their operations.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the government's account of the work on Agenda 2030 is sufficient, or whether implementation should be tightened by clarifying the role of the regions, applying feminist analysis and imposing human rights and environmental requirements on companies.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee stands behind the government's account of the work on Agenda 2030, rejects the motions calling for tighter implementation and proposes that the written communication be placed on file.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 1 (V, MP)
The reservation wants to clarify the implementation of Agenda 2030 by defining the role of the regions, carrying out feminist analysis of the work and establishing human rights and environmental requirements for companies.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: closing the file on the government's report (no further action) and rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 1 by V, MP.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | No 0/20/0/4 | follows the plan | confidence: high | not addressed |
| S | No | Yes 93/0/0/14 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| MP | No | No 0/15/0/3 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| C | No | Yes 20/0/0/4 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| L | No | Yes 13/0/0/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| KD | No | Yes 16/0/0/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| M | Yes | Yes 59/0/0/9 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| SD | Yes | Yes 63/0/0/10 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
Committee proposal
Parliament rejects the motions 2021/22:4768 by Ali Esbati et al. (V) claims 1-8 and 2021/22:4769 by Elisabeth Svantesson et al. (M) claims 1-4 and lays document 2021/22:247 on the table.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2021/22:4768 av Ali Esbati m.fl. (V) yrkandena 1-8 och 2021/22:4769 av Elisabeth Svantesson m.fl. (M) yrkandena 1-4 och lägger skrivelse 2021/22:247 till handlingarna.
Riksdag decision: In a document, the former government accounts for the work on implementing Agenda 2030 and the global goals for sustainable development that the UN General Assembly adopted in 2015. The document is a consequence of parliament issuing a formal request (tillkännagivande) to the government to submit a report every other year on the implementation and achievement of the Agenda 2030 goals. The document now submitted is the first of its kind. In the document, the former government assesses that 35 of the 169 sub-targets for achieving Agenda 2030 have been fully achieved, or have been achieved within Sweden. For 60 of the sub-targets, the former government assesses that further measures are needed. For 21 of the sub-targets, data was lacking to make an assessment. Parliament welcomes the document and notes that much progress has been made regarding the goals, both in Sweden and globally. Furthermore, Parliament notes that Sweden has a good starting position and better conditions to achieve the global goals than many other countries. Parliament believes, however, that there is a considerable way to go for Sweden before the goals are fulfilled. Parliament laid the document on the table, that is, closed the matter.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to clarify the implementation of Agenda 2030 by clarifying roles for regional authorities, conducting a feminist analysis, and establishing corporate requirements for human rights and environmental policies. (V, MP) — Reservation 1
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan requires that policy sets demands on companies in climate and environmental matters and rests explicitly on a feminist and anti-racist foundation where human rights should be fundamental to all policy.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that policy sets demands on companies in climate and environmental matters and rests explicitly on a feminist and anti-racist foundation where human rights should be fundamental to all policy. The counter-proposal's requirements for feminist analysis and corporate requirements on human rights and environment follow directly from this, even though Agenda 2030 is not mentioned in the documents.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att politiken ställer krav på företagen i klimat- och miljöfrågor och vilar uttalat på en feministisk och antirasistisk grund där mänskliga rättigheter ska vara grundläggande för all politik. Motförslagets krav på feministisk analys och på företagskrav om mänskliga rättigheter och miljö följer direkt av detta, även om Agenda 2030 inte nämns i dokumenten.
- demands on corporate transitiondecisive»Politiken kan och måste ställa krav på att industrin ställer om« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Policy can and must set demands on industry to transition”
- human rights guide policy»Respekten för de mänskliga rättigheterna ska vara grundläggande« (party programme ↗)“Respect for human rights should be fundamental”
flags: citat_blockerat
The plan is explicitly feminist and wants to see a global framework built on social justice and environmental consideration, with systematized monitoring of transnational companies.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan is explicitly feminist and wants to see a global framework built on social justice and environmental consideration, with systematized monitoring of transnational companies. The counter-proposal's demands for feminist analysis and requirements on companies for human rights and environment follow from these commitments. The plan also states that work with the global sustainability goals must gain new momentum.
Original (Swedish)
Planen är uttryckligen feministisk och vill se ett globalt regelverk som bygger på social rättvisa och hänsyn till miljön, med systematiserad bevakning av de transnationella företagen. Motförslagets krav på feministisk analys och krav på företag om mänskliga rättigheter och miljö följer av dessa åtaganden. Planen slår också fast att arbetet med de globala hållbarhetsmålen måste ta ny fart.
- feminist politicsdecisive»Med denna grundsyn är socialdemokratin ett feministiskt parti.« (party programme ↗)“With this basic view, social democracy is a feminist party.”
- global framework with environmental consideration»En central del i detta arbete är att i olika internationella organisationer verka för ett globalt ekonomiskt regelverk, som bygger på respekt för demokratin, social rättvisa och hänsyn till miljön.« (party programme ↗)“A central part of this work is to in various international organizations work for a global economic framework, which is built on respect for democracy, social justice and environmental consideration.”
- monitoring of companies»En mer systematiserad bevakning av de transnationella företagen och en samordning mellan fackliga aktioner och konsumentaktioner ska eftersträvas.« (party programme ↗)“More systematized monitoring of transnational companies and coordination between trade union actions and consumer actions shall be pursued.”
- sustainability goals are prioritized»Covid-19-pandemin har försvårat genomförandet av de globala hållbarhetsmålen. Det arbetet måste nu åter ta fart.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Covid-19 pandemic has hindered the implementation of the global sustainability goals. That work must now regain momentum.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan wants to develop and strengthen a feminist foreign policy and development policy, establishes that all actors in the economy have a responsibility to take ethical, social and ecological considerations and that Sweden shall set requirements on imported goods.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to develop and strengthen a feminist foreign policy and development policy, establishes that all actors in the economy have a responsibility to take ethical, social and ecological considerations and that Sweden shall set requirements on imported goods. The decentralist outlook also supports clarifying the regions' role. The counter-proposal's three demands thus align with the plan's direction, even though Agenda 2030 is not mentioned.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill utveckla och förstärka en feministisk utrikes- och utvecklingspolitik, slår fast att alla aktörer i ekonomin har ett ansvar att ta etiska, sociala och ekologiska hänsyn och att Sverige ska ställa krav på importerade varor. Den decentralistiska grundsynen ger också stöd för att regionernas roll klargörs. Motförslagets tre krav ligger därmed i planens riktning, även om Agenda 2030 inte nämns.
- feminist foreign policydecisive»utveckla och förstärka Sveriges feministiska utrikes- och utvecklingspolitik.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“develop and strengthen Sweden's feminist foreign policy and development policy.”
- companies' ethical responsibility»Alla aktörer i ekonomin har ett ansvar att ta etiska,« (party programme ↗)“All actors in the economy have a responsibility to take ethical,”
- requirements on environment and rights»Sverige ska ställa krav på att importerade varor är« (party programme ↗)“Sweden shall set requirements that imported goods are”
- regions' role and decentralization»Miljöpartiet har en decentralistisk grundsyn som« (party programme ↗)“The Green Party has a decentralist outlook that”
The plan lacks writings about Agenda 2030 but contains the three components the counter-proposal seeks: the party explicitly calls itself feminist, wants to decentralize so that decisions are made close to those affected, and wants to make stricter demands on working conditions, environment and climate against companies in trade agreements.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan lacks writings about Agenda 2030 but contains the three components the counter-proposal seeks: the party explicitly calls itself feminist, wants to decentralize so that decisions are made close to those affected, and wants to make stricter demands on working conditions, environment and climate against companies in trade agreements. Derived from these principles the plan supports the demands, although the plan simultaneously drives deregulation for companies.
Original (Swedish)
Planen saknar skrivningar om Agenda 2030 men innehåller de tre komponenter motförslaget efterfrågar: partiet kallar sig uttryckligen feministiskt, vill decentralisera så att beslut fattas nära dem som berörs, och vill ställa hårdare krav på arbetsvillkor, miljö och klimat gentemot företag i handelsavtal. Härlett ur dessa principer stöder planen kraven, även om planen samtidigt driver regelförenkling för företag.
- feminist partydecisive»Centerpartiet är ett feministiskt parti, som utmanar och bryter rådande maktförhållanden och kollektiva orättvisor.« (party programme ↗)“The Center Party is a feminist party, which challenges and breaks existing power relations and collective injustices.”
- demands on companies for environment and working conditions»Ställ hårdare krav på arbetsvillkor, miljö och klimat i handelsavtal.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Make stricter demands on working conditions, environment and climate in trade agreements.”
- clearer regional role»Decentralisera mera. Människor ska få bestämma mer själva, och politiska beslut ska fattas nära dem som berörs.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Decentralize more. People shall get to decide more themselves, and political decisions shall be made close to those affected.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The party programme requires that a gender equality perspective is integrated where ordinary decisions are made and resources are distributed, and the Liberals define themselves as a feminist party.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme requires that a gender equality perspective is integrated where ordinary decisions are made and resources are distributed, and the Liberals define themselves as a feminist party. This supports the counter-proposal's requirement for feminist analysis of Agenda 2030 work. That Sweden shall be a leading force and driving force in the global sustainability work and that regions have clearly specified assignments also speaks for the clarifications requested.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet kräver att ett jämställdhetsperspektiv integreras där ordinarie beslut fattas och resurser fördelas, och Liberalerna definierar sig som ett feministiskt parti. Det stöder motförslagets krav på feministisk analys av Agenda 2030-arbetet. Att Sverige ska vara pådrivande i det globala hållbarhetsarbetet och att regionerna har tydligt angivna uppdrag talar också för de förtydliganden som begärs.
- gender equality in all decisionsdecisive»Jämställdhet uppnås där ordinarie beslut fattas, resurser fördelas och normer skapas.« (party programme ↗)“Gender equality is achieved where ordinary decisions are made, resources are distributed and norms are created.”
- feminist party»gör Liberalerna till ett feministiskt parti.« (party programme ↗)“makes the Liberals a feminist party.”
- driving force for sustainability»Sverige ska vara en förebild och en pådrivande kraft i det globala arbetet för ett hållbart samhälle.« (party programme ↗)“Sweden shall be a model and a driving force in the global work for a sustainable society.”
- clear regional assignments»regioner med ansvar för bland annat sjukvård, kollektivtrafik, näringslivsutveckling och regionplanering.« (party programme ↗)“regions with responsibility for including healthcare, public transport, business development and regional planning.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The counter-proposal wants to clarify the role of the regions, analyze the work from a gender equality perspective and set requirements on companies regarding human rights and environment.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The counter-proposal wants to clarify the role of the regions, analyze the work from a gender equality perspective and set requirements on companies regarding human rights and environment. The party programme requires that the gender equality perspective permeates all policy areas, that multinational companies' responsibility for human rights is sharpened and that municipal and regional self-governance is strong and clear. The requirements therefore align with the plan, which however does not address Agenda 2030 as such.
Original (Swedish)
Motförslaget vill klargöra regionernas roll, analysera arbetet ur ett jämställdhetsperspektiv och ställa krav på företag i fråga om mänskliga rättigheter och miljö. Principprogrammet kräver att jämställdhetsperspektivet genomsyrar alla politikområden, att multinationella företags ansvar för mänskliga rättigheter skärps och att den kommunala och regionala självstyrelsen är stark och tydlig. Kraven ligger därför i linje med planen, som dock inte behandlar Agenda 2030 som sådan.
- gender equality across all policy areasdecisive»Jämställdhetsperspektivet ska genomsyra alla politikområden.« (party programme ↗)“The gender equality perspective shall permeate all policy areas.”
- corporate responsibility for rights»Förhållandet mellan näringslivet och mänskliga rättigheter kommer i fokus genom globaliseringen.« (party programme ↗)“The relationship between business and human rights comes into focus through globalization.”
- clear roles for self-governance»Den kommunala självstyrelsen ska vara stark« (party programme ↗)“Municipal self-governance shall be strong”
- gender equality as election promise»JÄMSTÄLLDHET PÅ RIKTIGT« (2022 manifesto ↗)“REAL GENDER EQUALITY”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The counter-proposal wishes to add new requirements on companies regarding human rights and environment and to expand the governance of Agenda 2030 work with new forms of analysis.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The counter-proposal wishes to add new requirements on companies regarding human rights and environment and to expand the governance of Agenda 2030 work with new forms of analysis. The election manifesto goes in the opposite direction: one-third of companies' administrative costs and bureaucratic red tape should be removed, over-implementation should be countered and decisions should be made at the lowest possible level. The party programme warns that a large state gives a weaker society. The demand is therefore rejected.
Original (Swedish)
Motförslaget vill lägga på nya krav på företag när det gäller mänskliga rättigheter och miljö samt bygga ut styrningen av Agenda 2030-arbetet med nya analysformer. Valmanifestet går i motsatt riktning: en tredjedel av företagens administrationskostnader och regelkrånglet ska bort, överimplementering ska motverkas och beslut fattas på lägsta möjliga nivå. Partiprogrammet varnar för att en stor stat ger ett svagare samhälle. Kravet avvisas därför.
- reduced regulatory burden for companiesdecisive»Ta bort en tredjedel av företagens administrationskostnader och en tredjedel av regelkrånglet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Remove one-third of companies' administrative costs and one-third of bureaucratic red tape”
- no to over-implementation»Minska regelkrånglet och onödig byråkrati, bland annat genom att motverka överimplementering i Sverige av EU-beslut – som huvudregel ska EU-direktiv genomföras på miniminivå« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Reduce bureaucratic red tape and unnecessary bureaucracy, including by countering over-implementation in Sweden of EU decisions - as a main rule, EU directives shall be implemented at the minimum level”
- decisions at the lowest level»Beslut ska fattas på lägsta möjliga nivå, så nära medborgarna som möjligt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Decisions shall be made at the lowest possible level, as close to citizens as possible.”
- limited state ambition»En stor stat leder till ett svagare samhälle.« (party programme ↗)“A large state leads to a weaker society.”
flags: citat_migrerat
The counter-proposal seeks to clarify Agenda 2030 work with feminist analysis and new requirements on companies regarding human rights and environment.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The counter-proposal seeks to clarify Agenda 2030 work with feminist analysis and new requirements on companies regarding human rights and environment. The plan rejects political measures aimed at creating the same outcome at group level between women and men and demands that unnecessary rules costing companies more than they benefit society be removed. New requirements of this kind are therefore, according to the plan, the wrong path.
Original (Swedish)
Motförslaget vill förtydliga Agenda 2030-arbetet med feministisk analys och nya krav på företag kring mänskliga rättigheter och miljö. Planen avvisar politiska åtgärder som ska skapa samma utfall på gruppnivå mellan kvinnor och män och kräver att onödiga regler som kostar företagen mer än de ger samhället tas bort. Nya krav av detta slag är därför enligt planen fel väg.
- formal, not outcome-driven equalitydecisive»Riktig jämställdhet nås inte genom att vidta politiska åtgärder för att på gruppnivå skapa samma utfall mellan män och kvinnor, utan genom att ta krafttag mot samhällsfenomen som begränsar den enskilde.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“True equality is not achieved by taking political action to create the same outcome at group level between men and women, but by taking strong action against social phenomena that limit the individual.”
- reduced regulatory burden»För att få fler och växande företag är det viktigt att ta bort onödiga regler där kostnaderna för företagen inte motsvarar nyttan för samhället.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“To get more and growing businesses, it is important to remove unnecessary rules where the costs to businesses do not correspond to the benefit to society.”
- regulatory simplification for business»Verka för regelförenkling och avlasta småföretagens administrativa börda« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Work towards regulatory simplification and relieve small businesses' administrative burden”
- stop symbolic politics»Stoppa symbolpolitik som går ut över möjligheten att bedriva industri och näring« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Stop symbolic politics that undermines the ability to conduct industry and enterprise”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2022/23:FiU7)
- Committee report full text (HA01FiU7)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2021/22:4768 — med anledning av skr. 2021/22:247 Sveriges genomförande av Agenda 2030 av Ali Esbati m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2021/22:4769 — med anledning av skr. 2021/22:247 Sveriges genomförande av Agenda 2030 av Elisabeth Svantesson m.fl. (M)
- Regeringens skrivelse 2021/22:247 — Sveriges genomförande av Agenda 2030
Source: The Swedish Parliament