2023-04-122022/23:CU12 · p.6CUCivil law & housing

Regulation by detailed plan

Regulation through detailed development plans

What's at stake: The outcome affects how much municipalities can steer construction through detailed plans, which matters for how quickly housing can be built and how strict climate and energy requirements can be placed on new buildings.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

The question is whether requirements for detailed development plans should be further limited or expanded, including allowing energy requirements in such plans, or whether recently enacted legal changes and ongoing inquiries are sufficient.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The committee points out that the detailed-plan requirement has already been clarified and narrowed through legal changes in 2019 and 2020, that a special investigator has already been tasked with reviewing municipalities' pre-emption rights, and that regional planning is already possible under current law, and therefore rejects the motions on further rule changes, energy requirements in detailed plans, and expanded regional planning.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 16 (V)

The reservation wants an earlier inquiry's proposals for giving municipalities more tools against land-banking to be implemented, and wants the Planning and Building Act amended so municipalities can require energy efficiency, heating type and construction standards already at the detailed-plan stage, since the built environment accounts for a large share of society's environmental impact and energy use.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 16 by V.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
Vown reservationNoNo 0/21/0/3follows the planconfidence: highnot addressed
SNoYes 92/0/0/15departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
MPNoYes 15/0/0/3departs from the planconfidence: highnot addressed
CYesYes 21/0/0/3follows the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
LYesYes 14/0/0/2follows the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
KDNoYes 16/0/0/3departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed
MYesYes 59/0/0/9follows the planconfidence: mediumderived
SDYesYes 64/0/0/9follows the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed

Committee proposal

Parliament rejects the motions 2022/23:562 by Markus Wiechel and Alexander Christiansson (both SD) demand 2, 2022/23:747 by Nicklas Attefjord (MP), 2022/23:1042 by Anna-Caren Sätherberg and Kalle Olsson (both S), 2022/23:1215 by Nooshi Dadgostar et al. (V) demands 12 and 13, 2022/23:1406 by Josefin Malmqvist et al. (M) demand 10, 2022/23:1443 by Adnan Dibrani (S) and 2022/23:1918 by Sten Bergheden (M).

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2022/23:562 av Markus Wiechel och Alexander Christiansson (båda SD) yrkande 2, 2022/23:747 av Nicklas Attefjord (MP), 2022/23:1042 av Anna-Caren Sätherberg och Kalle Olsson (båda S), 2022/23:1215 av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V) yrkandena 12 och 13, 2022/23:1406 av Josefin Malmqvist m.fl. (M) yrkande 10, 2022/23:1443 av Adnan Dibrani (S) och 2022/23:1918 av Sten Bergheden (M).

Riksdag decision: Parliament said no to 130 proposals in motions from the regular motion period 2022. Among other things with reference to the fact that work is ongoing on several issues. The proposals deal for example with review of the planning and building law, the planning system, permit matters, appeals rules and matters of compensation and supervision.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietNoNofollows the plannot addressed

The plan notes that the pace of construction has been held down so that house prices continue to rise and demands an active land policy in response.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan notes that the pace of construction has been held down so that house prices continue to rise and demands an active land policy in response. Tools against buildable land being left unbuilt while waiting for price increases is a direct application of that. Being able to set requirements for energy efficiency and construction already in detailed planning responds to the plan's demands for climate-smart and energy-efficient construction under societal planning.

Original (Swedish)

Planen konstaterar att byggtakten hållits nere för att bostadspriserna ska fortsätta stiga och kräver en aktiv markpolitik som svar. Verktyg mot att byggbar mark hålls obebyggd i väntan på prisstegring är en direkt tillämpning av det. Att kunna ställa krav på energieffektivitet och konstruktion redan i detaljplan svarar mot planens krav på ett klimatsmart och energisnålt byggande under samhällelig planering.

  • speculation slows constructiondecisive»Byggtakten har hållits nere för att bostadspriserna ska fortsätta att stiga, hyresgäster krävs på allt högre hyror« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The pace of construction has been held down so that house prices continue to rise, tenants are charged ever higher rents”
  • active land policy»Vänsterpartiet vill se ett statligt byggbolag, investeringsstöd för ökat bostadsbyggande och en aktiv markpolitik.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Left Party wants to see a state housing company, investment support for increased housing construction and an active land policy.”
  • climate-smart construction through planning»Med större kontroll och planering från samhällets sida, kan byggandet både öka i takt och bli miljösmart och lagra kol istället för att släppa ut koldioxid.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“With greater control and planning from society's side, construction can both increase in pace and become environmentally smart and store carbon instead of releasing carbon dioxide.”
  • energy-efficient construction»En långsiktigt hållbar miljö ska skapas genom hushållande med resurser och energisnålt byggande.« (party programme ↗)“A long-term sustainable environment should be created through economical use of resources and energy-efficient construction.”
SSocialdemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan makes housing provision a societal responsibility and sees low construction as a core problem, which argues for tools against buildable land being kept unbuilt for speculative purposes.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan makes housing provision a societal responsibility and sees low construction as a core problem, which argues for tools against buildable land being kept unbuilt for speculative purposes. The party programme also requires that environmental considerations are built in from the beginning and that housing and energy systems are shifted, which supports that energy requirements can be set already in the detailed plan. However, the content of the detailed plan is not explicitly addressed.

Original (Swedish)

Planen gör bostadsförsörjningen till ett samhälleligt ansvar och ser lågt byggande som ett kärnproblem, vilket talar för verktyg mot att byggbar mark hålls obebyggd i spekulationssyfte. Partiprogrammet kräver också att miljöhänsyn byggs in redan från början och att bostäder och energisystem ställs om, vilket stöder att energikrav får ställas redan i detaljplan. Just detaljplanens innehåll behandlas dock inte uttryckligen.

  • societal housing responsibilitydecisive»Därför anser vi att det är ett samhälleligt ansvar att trygga« (party programme ↗)“Therefore we believe it is a societal responsibility to ensure”
  • environmental requirements early in the process»Hänsynen till miljöns krav ska byggas in i produktionsprocesserna redan från början.« (party programme ↗)“Consideration of environmental requirements shall be built into production processes from the beginning.”
  • shifting the housing sector»Det övergripande kravet är att ställa om produktionsliv, bostäder, energisystem och« (party programme ↗)“The overarching demand is to shift economic production, housing, energy systems and”
  • energy-efficient housing»Underlätta familjers energieffektivisering. Det finns stora vinster i att energieffektivisera sitt hem, både för samhället i stort och för den egna ekonomin.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Facilitate families' energy efficiency. There are great gains in making one's home energy efficient, both for society at large and for one's own economy.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MPMiljöpartietNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan requires that construction occur in a land-efficient, resource-efficient and climate-smart way and that energy efficiency is powerfully supported.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan requires that construction occur in a land-efficient, resource-efficient and climate-smart way and that energy efficiency is powerfully supported. The ability to impose requirements for energy efficiency and construction already in the detailed plan is a tool for precisely that. Measures against building land being held undeveloped while waiting for price increases follow from the plan's desire to counter speculation and better utilize land.

Original (Swedish)

Planen kräver att byggnation sker på ett yteffektivt, resurseffektivt och klimatsmart sätt och att energieffektivisering stöds kraftfullt. Att kunna ställa krav på energieffektivitet och konstruktion redan i detaljplanen är ett verktyg för just det. Åtgärder mot att byggbar mark hålls obebyggd i väntan på prisuppgång följer av planens vilja att motverka spekulation och utnyttja marken bättre.

  • climate-smart constructiondecisive»Byggnation ska ske på ett yteffektivt, resurseffektivt och klimatsmart sätt.« (party programme ↗)“Construction shall occur in a land-efficient, resource-efficient and climate-smart way.”
  • powerful energy efficiency»införa ett kraftfullt stöd för energieffektivisering till både hushåll och industrier.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“introduce powerful support for energy efficiency for both households and industries.”
  • efficient land utilization»Vi vill utnyttja marken bättre genom att bygga både på bredden och höjden och på ytor som i dag inte används optimalt.« (party programme ↗)“We want to better utilize land by building both in breadth and height and on areas that are not currently optimally used.”
  • counter speculation»Girighet, överskuldsättning och spekulation ska motverkas.« (party programme ↗)“Greed, over-indebtedness and speculation shall be opposed.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

CCenterpartietYesYesfollows the plannot addressed

The plan places strong property rights and fewer rules at the centre for building and land use.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan places strong property rights and fewer rules at the centre for building and land use. To introduce tools that force landowners to build on their land and to allow demands for energy efficiency, heating type and construction already in detailed planning means both an intrusion on property rights and a new rule layer on top of the national building regulations. It goes against the plan's line on simple rules and incentives to build.

Original (Swedish)

Planen sätter en stark äganderätt och färre regler i centrum för byggande och markanvändning. Att införa verktyg som tvingar markägare att bebygga sin mark och att tillåta krav på energieffektivitet, uppvärmningstyp och konstruktion redan i detaljplan innebär både ett ingrepp i äganderätten och ett nytt regelskikt ovanpå de nationella byggreglerna. Det går emot planens linje om enkla regler och drivkrafter att bygga.

  • strong property rightsdecisive»Äganderätten är central för ett samhälle där människor kan förverkliga sig själva och sina drömmar.« (party programme ↗)“Property rights are central to a society where people can realize themselves and their dreams.”
  • fewer rules»Vi ska rensa upp bland överflödiga regler och byråkrati.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We shall clear up unnecessary rules and bureaucracy.”
  • no to arbitrary intrusions»Brott mot äganderätten, med konfiskatoriska och godtyckliga beskattningar och ingrepp, underminerar förtroendet och långsiktigheten i samhället.« (party programme ↗)“Violations of property rights, with confiscatory and arbitrary taxation and intrusions, undermine confidence and sustainability in society.”
  • incentives to build»starka drivkrafter att investera i bostäder, kan byggandet öka i hela landet.« (party programme ↗)“strong incentives to invest in homes, building can increase throughout the country.”
LLiberalernaYesYesfollows the plannot addressed

The plan wants to simplify building standards, shorten processes and limit municipal special requirements.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan wants to simplify building standards, shorten processes and limit municipal special requirements. Allowing requirements for energy efficiency, heating type and construction already in detailed planning creates instead more and more detailed municipal requirements on building. The plan does want building and planning rules to stimulate sustainable building, but this does not justify new detailed planning requirements.

Original (Swedish)

Planen vill förenkla byggnormerna, korta processerna och begränsa kommunala särkrav. Att tillåta krav på energieffektivitet, uppvärmningstyp och konstruktion redan i detaljplan skapar tvärtom fler och mer detaljerade kommunala krav på byggandet. Planen vill visserligen att bygg- och planregler stimulerar hållbart byggande, men det motiverar inte nya detaljplanekrav.

  • limit municipal special requirementsdecisive»möjligheterna till att begränsa kommunala särkrav ses över« (party programme ↗)“possibilities to limit municipal special requirements are reviewed”
  • simplified building standards»Byggnormerna bör förenklas, överklagandeprocessen förkortas« (party programme ↗)“Building standards should be simplified, appeal process shortened”
  • simpler building regulations»fortsätta förenkla byggreglerna« (2022 manifesto ↗)“continue to simplify building regulations”
  • sustainable building»Framtidens samhällen måste byggas på ett miljömässigt hållbart sätt.« (party programme ↗)“Future communities must be built in an environmentally sustainable way.”
KDKristdemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan gives municipalities the social responsibility for housing provision and establishes that unnecessary rules must not prevent a municipality from meeting that responsibility, which speaks for tools against buildable land being kept unbuilt.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan gives municipalities the social responsibility for housing provision and establishes that unnecessary rules must not prevent a municipality from meeting that responsibility, which speaks for tools against buildable land being kept unbuilt. It also requires that the environmental burden of dwellings be considered from a lifecycle perspective and that environmentally adapted architecture be used. Requirements in detailed plans are however a tightening of rules that the plan does not take a position on.

Original (Swedish)

Planen ger kommunerna det sociala ansvaret för bostadsförsörjningen och slår fast att onödiga regler inte får hindra en kommun från att leva upp till det ansvaret, vilket talar för verktyg mot att byggbar mark hålls obebyggd. Den kräver också att bostäders miljöbelastning beaktas ur ett livscykelperspektiv och att miljöanpassad arkitektur används. Krav i detaljplan är dock en regelskärpning som planen inte uttalar sig om.

  • municipal housing responsibilitydecisive»Kommunerna ska ha det sociala ansvaret för att« (party programme ↗)“Municipalities shall have social responsibility for”
  • lifecycle perspective on building»Bostäders belastning på miljön ur ett livscykelperspektiv ska beaktas.« (party programme ↗)“The environmental burden of dwellings from a lifecycle perspective should be considered.”
  • environmentally adapted building»Miljöanpassad arkitektur spelar en viktig roll för« (party programme ↗)“Environmentally adapted architecture plays an important role for”
  • no unnecessary obstacles for municipalities»och onödiga regler får inte stå i vägen för en kommun« (party programme ↗)“and unnecessary rules must not stand in the way of a municipality”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MModeraternaYesYesfollows the planderived

The plan wishes to replace detailed plans with simpler building plans and significantly reduce bureaucratic red tape, while the counter-proposal wishes to add new requirements for energy efficiency, heating and construction to the detailed plan.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan wishes to replace detailed plans with simpler building plans and significantly reduce bureaucratic red tape, while the counter-proposal wishes to add new requirements for energy efficiency, heating and construction to the detailed plan. The plan also values property rights and the principle that whoever owns land should be able to use it as they see fit, which argues against new compulsory tools against undeveloped buildable land.

Original (Swedish)

Planen vill ersätta avancerade detaljplaner med enklare byggplaner och kraftigt minska regelkrånglet, medan motförslaget vill lägga nya krav på energieffektivitet, uppvärmning och konstruktion i detaljplanen. Planen värnar också äganderätten och principen att den som äger mark ska få använda den efter eget huvud, vilket talar mot nya tvingande verktyg mot obebyggd byggbar mark.

  • simpler planning systemdecisive»Ersätta avancerade detaljplaner med enklare byggplaner« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Replace detailed plans with simpler building plans”
  • owner's right of disposal»rätt att använda sitt ägande efter eget huvud ska vara vägledande.« (party programme ↗)“the right to use one's property as one sees fit should be guiding.”
  • strong property rights»Äganderätten och näringsfriheten ska ha ett starkt skydd i« (party programme ↗)“Property rights and business freedom shall have strong protection in”
  • reduced bureaucratic red tape»Ta bort en tredjedel av företagens administrationskostnader och en tredjedel av regelkrånglet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Remove one-third of companies' administrative costs and one-third of bureaucratic red tape”
SDSverigedemokraternaYesYesfollows the plannot addressed

The counter-proposal wishes requirements for energy efficiency, heating type and construction to be capable of being set already in detailed plan, thus more requirements on building.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The counter-proposal wishes requirements for energy efficiency, heating type and construction to be capable of being set already in detailed plan, thus more requirements on building. The plan's commitment is the opposite: regulations and requirements that govern residential building shall be reviewed, simplified and accelerated so that housing becomes cheaper to build. New climate-motivated planning provisions are the type of cost-raising symbolic politics the plan rejects.

Original (Swedish)

Motförslaget vill att krav på energieffektivitet, uppvärmningstyp och konstruktion ska kunna ställas redan i detaljplan, alltså fler krav på byggandet. Planens åtagande är det motsatta: regelverk och krav som styr bostadsbyggande ska ses över, förenklas och snabbas på för att bostäder ska bli billigare att bygga. Nya klimatmotiverade planbestämmelser är den typ av fördyrande symbolpolitik planen avvisar.

  • fewer building requirementsdecisive»Sverigedemokraterna vill underlätta bostadsbyggande genom att förenkla och snabba på beslutsprocesser och se över de omfattande regelverk och krav som styr bostadsbyggande.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden Democrats wish to facilitate residential building by simplifying and accelerating decision processes and reviewing the extensive regulations and requirements that govern residential building.”
  • simplify planning process»Anpassa och förenkla regler och processer för planering och byggnation« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Adapt and simplify rules and processes for planning and building.”
  • review building standards»Nybyggnation kan underlättas genom att se över byggnormer och öka konkurrensen på byggmarknaden.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“New construction can be facilitated by reviewing building standards and increasing competition on the building market.”
  • stop symbolic politics»Stoppa symbolpolitik som går ut över möjligheten att bedriva industri och näring« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Stop symbolic politics that undermines the ability to conduct industry and business.”

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament