2023-06-072022/23:SoU21 · p.17SoUHealth & social services
Support for the Visually Impaired and Access to Guide Dogs
Support for people with visual impairments and new legislation on guide dogs
What's at stake: People who are blind or severely visually impaired are a relatively small group, which according to the motions makes it hard to build up specialist expertise locally. Guide dogs are crucial to many visually impaired people's mobility and independence, and the issue concerns how guide dog services should be regulated and how support for the group as a whole should be organised.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The motions called for a government inquiry into coordinated national support for blind and severely visually impaired people, and for a parliamentary initiative on guide dog services, while the committee held that the forthcoming legislative change on guide dogs and existing support already address the issues.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee notes that the government has approved a Council on Legislation referral proposing a new law for guide dog services and that a bill is expected to be put before parliament, and on that basis considers the motion on guide dogs should be rejected. The committee also does not consider parliament needs to take any initiative on coordinated national support for people with visual impairments.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 36 (SD)
The reserving party (SD) wants the government to investigate how coordinated support for blind and severely visually impaired people could be developed, for example as a national knowledge centre, since the group of around 120,000 people is too small for specialist expertise to be built up locally.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 36 by SD.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have held
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: MPMiljöpartiet
Ja 240–64Ja 225–79
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Yes 21/0/0/3 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| S | No | Yes 94/0/0/13 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| MP | No | Yes 15/0/0/3 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| C | No | Yes 20/0/1/3 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| L | No | Yes 14/0/0/2 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| KD | No | Yes 16/0/0/3 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| M | No | Yes 60/0/0/8 | differs | confidence: low | not addressed |
| SD | No | No 0/63/0/9 | match | confidence: medium | derived |
Broke with the party line
| CHelena Lindahl (C, Västerbottens län) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
MPs whose vote differs from their party's majority position in this division. Marked with a dark ring in the chamber view.
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2022/23:87 by Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M) and 2022/23:961 by Magnus Persson et al. (SD) request 5.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2022/23:87 av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M) och 2022/23:961 av Magnus Persson m.fl. (SD) yrkande 5.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag rejected approximately seventy proposals in motions from the general motion period 2022 concerning support for persons with disabilities. The Riksdag primarily refers to ongoing work. The motions dealt, among other things, with the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, state leadership for personal assistance, and automobile support.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to investigate more flexible financing models for interpretation services for deaf and hard of hearing people. (SD) — Reservation 36
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan requires that all parts of society are made accessible and that those who live with a disability can rely on the support being there without the right to participation constantly being questioned.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that all parts of society are made accessible and that those who live with a disability can rely on the support being there without the right to participation constantly being questioned. Investigating coordinated support for the blind and severely visually impaired, for example a national knowledge centre, addresses the fact that specialist expertise cannot otherwise be built up locally. The plan does not address guide dogs or the visually impaired specifically, which is why the position is derived.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att alla delar av samhället görs tillgängliga och att den som lever med funktionsnedsättning ska kunna lita på att stödet finns utan att rätten till delaktighet ständigt ifrågasätts. Att utreda ett sammanhållet stöd till blinda och gravt synskadade, till exempel ett nationellt kunskapscenter, svarar mot att specialistkompetens annars inte kan byggas upp lokalt. Planen behandlar inte ledarhundar eller synskadade särskilt, varför ställningstagandet härleds.
- reliable disability supportdecisive»På samma sätt ska du som lever med funktionsnedsättning kunna lita på att du får det stöd du behöver, och på att din rätt att delta i samhället på det sätt du vill inte ständigt ifrågasätts och försvåras.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“In the same way, you who live with a disability should be able to rely on receiving the support you need, and on the fact that your right to participate in society in the way you wish is not constantly questioned and made difficult.”
- accessible society»delar av samhället göras tillgängligt och den alltför svaga diskrimineringslagstiftningen stärkas.« (party programme ↗)“parts of society are made accessible and the far too weak anti-discrimination legislation is strengthened.”
- right to participation»Alla människor ska ha rätten att vara delaktiga i samhället, bli bemötta« (party programme ↗)“All people should have the right to be part of society, be treated”
- strengthened support measures»attackerna mot rätten att leva som andra bekämpas« (party programme ↗)“attacks on the right to live like others are combated”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan's commitment is that persons with disabilities can live their life like others, with the right to employment, their own housing and full freedom of movement, and that everyone in the whole country shall have equivalent access to healthcare and care.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's commitment is that persons with disabilities can live their life like others, with the right to employment, their own housing and full freedom of movement, and that everyone in the whole country shall have equivalent access to healthcare and care. Investigating a coordinated support, for example a national knowledge centre for the blind and severely visually impaired, responds to the fact that specialized expertise cannot be built up locally for a small group. The plan also wants to see more individually tailored support. The plan therefore supports the demand.
Original (Swedish)
Planens åtagande är att personer med funktionsnedsättning ska kunna leva sitt liv som andra, med rätt till arbete, eget boende och full rörelsefrihet, och att alla i hela landet ska ha likvärdig tillgång till vård och omsorg. Att utreda ett sammanhållet stöd, exempelvis ett nationellt kunskapscenter för blinda och gravt synskadade, svarar mot att specialistkompetens inte kan byggas upp lokalt för en liten grupp. Planen vill också se mer individuellt utformade insatser. Planen stöder därför kravet.
- live like othersdecisive»Personer med funktionsnedsättning ska kunna leva sitt liv som andra.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Persons with disabilities shall be able to live their life like others.”
- rights regardless of functional ability»funktionsförmåga, har rätt till arbete, eget boende, full rörelsefrihet och ett aktivt liv.« (party programme ↗)“functional ability, have the right to employment, their own housing, full freedom of movement and an active life.”
- equivalent healthcare throughout the country»Alla invånare i hela landet ska ha likvärdig tillgång till skola, vård och omsorg.« (party programme ↗)“All residents in the whole country shall have equivalent access to school, healthcare and care.”
- individually tailored support»Vi vill se mer individuellt utformade insatser för att skapa jobb eller utbildning för personer med funktionsnedsättningar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to see more individually tailored support to create employment or education for persons with disabilities.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto promises to improve support for people with disabilities and rare diagnoses regardless of where in the country one lives, which is precisely what the counter-proposal's coordinated support and centre of expertise aim at for a small group.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto promises to improve support for people with disabilities and rare diagnoses regardless of where in the country one lives, which is precisely what the counter-proposal's coordinated support and centre of expertise aim at for a small group. The plan also wants aids to be included in the high-cost protection and sees inaccessibility as the real barrier.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet lovar att förbättra stödet för personer med funktionsnedsättning och sällsynta diagnoser oavsett var i landet man bor, vilket är precis det motförslagets sammanhållna stöd och kunskapscenter syftar till för en liten grupp. Planen vill också att hjälpmedel ingår i högkostnadsskyddet och ser otillgängligheten som det verkliga hindret.
- equivalent support nationwidedecisive»förbättra stödet för personer med funktionsnedsättning och sällsynta diagnoser oavsett var du bor i landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“improve support for people with disabilities and rare diagnoses regardless of where you live in the country.”
- aids in high-cost protection»att hjälpmedel ska ingå i högkostnadsskyddet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“that aids shall be included in the high-cost protection.”
- equal rights with disability»Alla människor, oavsett funktionsnedsättning eller« (party programme ↗)“All people, regardless of disability or”
- inaccessibility is the barrier»Det är otillgängligheten i samhället som« (party programme ↗)“It is the inaccessibility in society that”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The election manifesto states that someone who has a functional impairment shall receive the support that is needed, and the party programme that accessibility is crucial for people with different functional impairments and that the state's goal is to protect the most vulnerable.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto states that someone who has a functional impairment shall receive the support that is needed, and the party programme that accessibility is crucial for people with different functional impairments and that the state's goal is to protect the most vulnerable. To investigate comprehensive support, for instance a national knowledge centre, for a group that is too small for local specialist competence follows from these commitments. Vision-impaired support is not explicitly mentioned.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet slår fast att den som har en funktionsnedsättning ska få det stöd som behövs, och partiprogrammet att tillgängligheten är avgörande för människor med olika funktionsnedsättningar och att statens mål är att skydda de mest utsatta. Att utreda ett sammanhållet stöd, exempelvis ett nationellt kunskapscenter, för en grupp som är för liten för lokal specialistkompetens följer av dessa åtaganden. Synskadades stöd nämns inte uttryckligen.
- support for functional impairmentdecisive»Du som har en funktionsnedsättning ska få det stöd du behöver, och staten ska ta ett större ansvar för att LSS fungerar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“You who have a functional impairment shall receive the support you need, and the state shall take greater responsibility for LSS to work.”
- accessibility crucial»Tillgängligheten är avgörande för människor med olika funktionsnedsättningar.« (party programme ↗)“Accessibility is crucial for people with different functional impairments.”
- state's protective duty»att skydda de svagaste och mest utsatta« (party programme ↗)“that the state protect the most vulnerable”
- no one disadvantaged»Vi måste fortsätta arbetet för ett Sverige där ingen missgynnas på grund av kön, härkomst eller funktionsnedsättning« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We must continue the work for a Sweden where no one is disadvantaged because of gender, background or functional impairment”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan requires that conditions for aids are equivalent throughout the country and that expanded national coordination is needed, especially to improve care options for rare diagnoses and small groups.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that conditions for aids are equivalent throughout the country and that expanded national coordination is needed, especially to improve care options for rare diagnoses and small groups. To investigate a coherent national support, for example a knowledge centre for the blind and severely visually impaired, directly addresses this. The plan also emphasises that functioning rehabilitation and aids are a prerequisite for work and education.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att villkoren för hjälpmedel är likvärdiga i hela landet och att en utökad nationell samordning behövs, särskilt för att förbättra vårdmöjligheterna vid sällsynta diagnoser och små grupper. Att utreda ett sammanhållet nationellt stöd, exempelvis ett kunskapscenter för blinda och gravt synskadade, svarar direkt mot detta. Planen betonar också att fungerande habilitering och hjälpmedel är en förutsättning för arbete och utbildning.
- national coordination for small groupsdecisive»Det stärker likvärdigheten och valfriheten, förbättrar vårdmöjligheterna för sällsynta diagnoser och ökar tillgången till hälso- och sjukvård i landets glest befolkade delar.« (party programme ↗)“This strengthens equality and freedom of choice, improves care options for rare diagnoses and increases access to healthcare in sparsely populated parts of the country.”
- equivalent aids»Villkoren för hjälpmedel ska vara likvärdiga i hela landet.« (party programme ↗)“Conditions for aids shall be equivalent throughout the country.”
- rehabilitation enables work»En väl fungerande habilitering och tillgång till hjälpmedel är i många fall en förutsättning för möjligheten till arbete och utbildning.« (party programme ↗)“Well-functioning rehabilitation and access to aids are in many cases a prerequisite for the possibility of work and education.”
- expanded national control»Det behövs en utökad nationell samordning och styrning.« (party programme ↗)“There is a need for expanded national coordination and control.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan requires that aids, care, support and service be designed according to the individual's needs and that compensatory measures are necessary as they reduce the significance of disability.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that aids, care, support and service be designed according to the individual's needs and that compensatory measures are necessary as they reduce the significance of disability. Increased accessibility is highlighted as a central means, and the election manifesto prioritises self-determination in cases of disability. Investigating cohesive support, for example a national knowledge centre for the blind and severely sight-impaired, follows from these commitments.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att hjälpmedel, vård, omsorg och service utformas efter den enskildes behov och att kompensatoriska insatser är nödvändiga eftersom de minskar funktionsnedsättningens betydelse. Ökad tillgänglighet lyfts som ett centralt medel, och valmanifestet prioriterar självbestämmande vid funktionsnedsättning. Att utreda ett sammanhållet stöd, till exempel ett nationellt kunskapscenter för blinda och gravt synskadade, följer av dessa åtaganden.
- support tailored to individual needsdecisive»Såväl hjälpmedel som utbildning, vård, omsorg och« (party programme ↗)“Both aids and education, care, support and”
- necessary compensatory measures»Även insatser som är kompensatoriska« (party programme ↗)“Even measures that are compensatory”
- increased accessibility»Ett annat viktigt sätt att minska funktionsnedsättningens betydelse är att öka tillgängligheten i samhället.« (party programme ↗)“Another important way to reduce the significance of disability is to increase accessibility in society.”
- self-determination in disability»SJÄLVBESTÄMMANDE VID FUNKTIONSNEDSÄTTNING« (2022 manifesto ↗)“SELF-DETERMINATION IN CASES OF DISABILITY”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan establishes that everyone has the right to equivalent care and that welfare shall function regardless of where in the country you live, and it uses national coordination as a tool when local capacity is insufficient.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that everyone has the right to equivalent care and that welfare shall function regardless of where in the country you live, and it uses national coordination as a tool when local capacity is insufficient. Investigating integrated national support for the severely visually impaired, where the group is too small for local specialist expertise, aligns with this. Support for the visually impaired is not addressed, so the conclusion is derived.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att alla har rätt till likvärdig vård och att välfärden ska fungera oavsett var i landet man bor, och den använder nationell samordning som verktyg när den lokala kapaciteten inte räcker. Att utreda ett sammanhållet nationellt stöd till gravt synskadade, där gruppen är för liten för lokal specialistkompetens, ligger i linje med detta. Synskadades stöd behandlas inte, varför slutsatsen är härledd.
- equivalent caredecisive»Alla har rätt till likvärdig vård – som kan ges i rätt tid och håller hög kvalitet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Everyone has the right to equivalent care - which can be provided in the right time and maintains high quality.”
- welfare throughout the country»Du ska kunna känna dig trygg med att välfärden fungerar oavsett var i landet du bor.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“You should be able to feel secure that welfare functions regardless of where in the country you live.”
- national coordination of care»Inrätta en nationell vårdförmedling som ska hjälpa patienter med lång väntetid att få vård i en annan del av landet där det finns ledig kapacitet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Establish a national care referral service that shall help patients with long waiting times to receive care in another part of the country where there is available capacity”
- the state's responsibility for vulnerable»skäl inte kan arbeta har staten ett ansvar.« (party programme ↗)“reasons cannot work, the state has a responsibility.”
flags: citat_migrerat
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto notes that support for persons with functional limitations looks different across the country and that expertise regarding different diagnoses is needed to meet the needs that actually exist, and demands a national LSS boost and state overall responsibility for personal assistance.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto notes that support for persons with functional limitations looks different across the country and that expertise regarding different diagnoses is needed to meet the needs that actually exist, and demands a national LSS boost and state overall responsibility for personal assistance. The counter-proposal's demand to investigate a coherent national support, for example a knowledge centre for the blind and severely visually impaired, follows that line regarding national expertise instead of uneven local capacity.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet konstaterar att stödet till personer med funktionsnedsättning ser olika ut över landet och att det krävs kompetens kring olika diagnoser för att tillgodose de behov som faktiskt finns, och kräver ett nationellt LSS-lyft samt statligt helhetsansvar för personlig assistans. Motförslagets krav på att utreda ett sammanhållet nationellt stöd, exempelvis ett kunskapscenter för blinda och gravt synskadade, följer av den linjen om nationell kompetens i stället för ojämn lokal förmåga.
- diagnosis-specific expertisedecisive»Det krävs därför kompetens kring olika diagnoser och sjukdomar för att tillgodose de behov som faktiskt finns.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It therefore requires expertise regarding different diagnoses and diseases to meet the needs that actually exist.”
- national LSS boost»Se ett nationellt LSS-lyft« (2022 manifesto ↗)“See a national LSS boost.”
- state overall responsibility»Ha statligt helhetsansvar för personlig assistans« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Have state overall responsibility for personal assistance.”
- participation for those with disabilities»Sverigedemokraterna vill stärka möjligheten för personer med nedsatt arbetsförmåga att delta i arbetslivet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden Democrats wish to strengthen the possibility for persons with reduced working capacity to participate in working life.”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2022/23:SoU21)
- Committee report full text (HA01SoU21)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2022/23:1051 — Från daglig verksamhet till arbete av Gustaf Lantz (S)
- Motion 2022/23:1201 — Översyn av statsbidraget för habiliteringsersättning av Anna-Belle Strömberg och Peder Björk (båda S)
- Motion 2022/23:1232 — En funktionsrättspolitik för trygghet och delaktighet av Maj Karlsson m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2022/23:1310 — Samordnad vård för personer med sällsynta hälsotillstånd av Alexandra Völker (S)
- Motion 2022/23:1376 — En nationell hjälpmedelsstrategi av Linnéa Wickman m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2022/23:1427 — Stärkt anhörigstöd för föräldrar till funktionsnedsatta barn av Sanna Backeskog m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2022/23:1516 — Ledsagning av Larry Söder (KD)
- Motion 2022/23:1622 — Översyn av hjälpmedel och bostadsanpassning av Martina Johansson (C)
- Motion 2022/23:1684 — Information till myndigheter om elöverkänslighet som funktionshinder av Ulrika Heie (C)
- Motion 2022/23:181 — Stärk demokratin och de mänskliga rättigheterna av Märta Stenevi m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2022/23:2045 — Stärkt ekonomi för personer med intellektuell funktionsnedsättning av Daniel Persson (SD)
- Motion 2022/23:2061 — Utgiftsområde 9 Hälsovård, sjukvård och social omsorg av Fredrik Lundh Sammeli m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2022/23:2088 — Förbättringar i den personliga assistansen av Ulrika Westerlund m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2022/23:231 — Hinder för fusk med assistansersättningar av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2022/23:468 — Klimatkompensation i bilstödet av Isak From (S)
- Motion 2022/23:608 — Valfrihet gällande sysselsättningsmodeller för personer med funktionsvariation av Marléne Lund Kopparklint (M)
- Motion 2022/23:709 — Effektivare handläggning av bilstödet för anpassning av fordon av Helena Gellerman (L)
- Motion 2022/23:739 — Forskningen om sjukdomen ALS och patienternas rätt till assistans av Nicklas Attefjord och Ulrika Westerlund (båda MP)
- Motion 2022/23:741 — Syskon till barn med omfattande funktionsnedsättningar av Nicklas Attefjord m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2022/23:757 — Verksamheter som bedrivs enligt LSS av Jan Riise (MP)
Source: The Swedish Parliament