2024-06-122023/24:NU19 · p.2NUBusiness & energy
Business Promotion Measures
Business-promotion measures for the cultural and creative industries
What's at stake: How concrete the strategy is determines how much targeted support, advice and financing companies in music, design, gaming, fashion and film receive to grow and export. It concerns entrepreneurs in the cultural and creative industries as well as Sweden's competitiveness and international image.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the government's strategy for companies in the cultural and creative industries is sufficiently concrete and ambitious, or whether an updated strategy with clearer measures and increased funding is needed.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee welcomes the government's strategy for companies in the cultural and creative industries and shares the vision for 2033 of a strengthened Swedish position in the sector, greater growth, exports and a positive image of Sweden abroad. It welcomes the coordinating role given to the Ministry of Culture and the government's ongoing dialogue with industry representatives, and considers that systems for advice, support and financing for companies should be generic rather than sector-specific.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 3 (MP)
The Green Party argues that the government's strategy leaves much to be desired and gives too little guidance on how identified obstacles will be addressed. It wants the government to promptly return with an updated strategy featuring concrete measures, a higher level of ambition on reforms and funding, and an investigation into establishing an institute for the cultural and creative industries.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 3 by MP.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Abstain 0/0/19/5 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | derived |
| S | No | Abstain 0/0/90/16 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| MP | No | No 0/15/0/3 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| C | Yes | Abstain 0/0/21/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | derived |
| L | Yes | Yes 12/0/0/4 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| KD | Yes | Yes 16/0/0/3 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| M | Yes | Yes 58/0/0/10 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| SD | Yes | Yes 63/0/0/9 | follows the plan | confidence: low | derived |
Committee proposal
Parliament rejects the motions 2023/24:2883 by Fredrik Olovsson et al. (S) items 1 and 3, 2023/24:2885 by Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist and Rickard Nordin (both C) items 2-4 and 2023/24:2889 by Elin Söderberg and Amanda Lind (both MP) items 1 in this part, 2 and 3.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2023/24:2883 av Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S) yrkandena 1 och 3, 2023/24:2885 av Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist och Rickard Nordin (båda C) yrkandena 2-4 och 2023/24:2889 av Elin Söderberg och Amanda Lind (båda MP) yrkandena 1 i denna del, 2 och 3.
Riksdag decision: Parliament has dealt with a document from the government on strategy for enterprises in cultural and creative industries. The strategy contains the government's overarching vision, six strategic goals and an equal number of priority areas. One of the goals is, among other things, targeted advice and financing, targeted support and reduced regulatory costs. Another goal is good skills supply, lifelong learning and good conditions in the social security systems. Parliament considers that the strategy overall provides a good foundation for continued work on promoting enterprises in cultural and creative industries. Accordingly, Parliament filed the document, that is, concluded the matter. Parliament also rejected the motion items.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants the government to present an updated strategy for cultural and creative industries that strengthens these industries' development and export opportunities and investigates establishing an institute for these sectors. (MP) — Reservation 3
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan treats cultural and creative activities as cultural policy, not business policy, but commits that cultural policy shall create good economic conditions for both institutions and free culture and for new cultural forms.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan treats cultural and creative activities as cultural policy, not business policy, but commits that cultural policy shall create good economic conditions for both institutions and free culture and for new cultural forms. The counter-proposal's demand for higher ambition level for reforms and financing, as well as an investigation of an institute for games, music and film, aligns with this. The plan's demand that culture stands free from commercial control simultaneously pulls against a purely growth-oriented approach.
Original (Swedish)
Planen behandlar kulturella och kreativa verksamheter som kulturpolitik, inte näringspolitik, men åtar sig att kulturpolitiken ska skapa goda ekonomiska villkor för såväl institutioner som den fria kulturen och för nya kulturformer. Motförslagets krav på högre ambitionsnivå för reformer och finansiering samt en utredning av ett institut för spel, musik och film ligger i linje med det. Planens krav på att kulturen står fri från kommersiell styrning drar samtidigt emot en renodlat tillväxtinriktad ansats.
- good economic conditions for culturedecisive»Kulturpolitiken behöver skapa goda ekonomiska villkor för såväl« (party programme ↗)“Cultural policy needs to create good economic conditions for both”
- culture's value for all»Kultur som konst, musik och film bidrar till att skapa ett rikare samhälle att leva i för alla.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Culture as art, music and film contributes to creating a richer society to live in for everyone.”
- good conditions for sound business»Vi vill se goda villkor för sunda företag, som tar tillvara på människors drivkrafter att bygga upp egna verksamheter och riktar dem mot« (party programme ↗)“We want to see good conditions for sound business, which taps into people's drive to build their own activities and directs them toward”
- culture's independence (qualifying)»Det är viktigt att kulturen står fri från såväl kommersiell som politisk styrning och finns i hela landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It is important that culture stands free from both commercial and political control and exists across the country.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto wants to strengthen the long-term conditions for enterprise and invest in digitalization and education, and stands guard over a vibrant cultural life.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto wants to strengthen the long-term conditions for enterprise and invest in digitalization and education, and stands guard over a vibrant cultural life. The counter-proposal's requirement for a more ambitious and concrete strategy for the cultural and creative industries is in line with the active business policy the plan advocates. However, the plan says nothing about sector-specific versus general support systems, which is why the conclusion is derived and uncertain.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet vill stärka de långsiktiga förutsättningarna för företagande och satsa på digitalisering och utbildning, och slår vakt om ett levande kulturliv. Motförslagets krav på en mer ambitiös och konkret strategi för de kulturella och kreativa branscherna ligger i linje med den aktiva näringspolitik planen förespråkar. Planen säger däremot ingenting om branschspecifika kontra generella stödsystem, varför slutsatsen är härledd och osäker.
- active business and innovation policydecisive»Vi vill satsa på grön teknik, digitalisering och utbildning så att företagsklimatet stärks och kompetensförsörjningen förbättras.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to invest in green technology, digitalization and education so that the business climate is strengthened and skills supply is improved.”
- living cultural life»Sverige ska ha ett levande, fritt och obundet kulturliv som både stärker samhörigheten och utmanar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden shall have a living, free and independent cultural life that both strengthens cohesion and challenges.”
- stimulate enterprise»entreprenörskap och kooperativ och social företagsamhet ska stimuleras« (party programme ↗)“entrepreneurship and cooperative and social enterprise shall be stimulated”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto wants to see a broad recovery plan for cultural life throughout the country and to improve culture creators' economic and social conditions, which presupposes concrete measures and funding rather than a generally worded strategy.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto wants to see a broad recovery plan for cultural life throughout the country and to improve culture creators' economic and social conditions, which presupposes concrete measures and funding rather than a generally worded strategy. The party programme also wants society to support the emergence of smaller businesses. The counter-proposal's requirement for an updated strategy with higher ambition levels and an investigated institute is in line with this.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet vill se en bred återhämtningsplan för kulturlivet i hela landet och förbättra kulturskaparnas ekonomiska och sociala villkor, vilket förutsätter konkreta åtgärder och finansiering snarare än en allmänt hållen strategi. Partiprogrammet vill dessutom att samhället stödjer framväxten av mindre företag. Motförslagets krav på en uppdaterad strategi med högre ambitionsnivå och ett utrett institut ligger i linje med detta.
- recovery plan for cultural lifedecisive»satsa på en bred återhämtningsplan för kulturlivet i hela landet, som omfattar både offentliga, fria, professionella och ideella aktörer.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“invest in a broad recovery plan for cultural life throughout the country, covering both public, independent, professional and voluntary actors.”
- culture creators' conditions»förbättra kulturskaparnas ekonomiska och sociala villkor och modernisera upphovsrätten så att kulturskaparnas rättigheter värnas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“improve culture creators' economic and social conditions and modernise copyright so that culture creators' rights are protected.”
- support for small businesses»Vi vill stärka möjligheterna för människor med goda idéer att starta och driva företag.« (party programme ↗)“We want to strengthen the opportunities for people with good ideas to start and run businesses.”
The plan's line for business is general conditions, lower taxes and fewer rules, not industry-specific investments and new state institutes.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's line for business is general conditions, lower taxes and fewer rules, not industry-specific investments and new state institutes. The party programme furthermore warns that policy acts as a taste judge and the manifesto demands arm's length distance from culture. An updated state strategy with designated reforms and an institute for cultural and creative industries therefore goes against the plan's stance.
Original (Swedish)
Planens linje för företagande är generella villkor, lägre skatt och färre regler, inte branschspecifika satsningar och nya statliga institut. Partiprogrammet varnar dessutom för att politiken agerar smakdomare och manifestet kräver armlängds avstånd till kulturen. En uppdaterad statlig strategi med utpekade reformer och ett institut för kulturella och kreativa näringar går därför emot planens hållning.
- arm's length distance from culturedecisive»Den akademiska och konstnärliga friheten liksom den fria kulturen är grundbultar i ett vitalt civilsamhälle. Politiken ska bidra till goda förutsättningar men hålla armlängds avstånd.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Academic and artistic freedom and free culture are cornerstones of a vital civil society. Policy should contribute to good conditions but keep arm's length distance.”
- no political taste judgement»Skaparglädje frodas i frihet. Politiken ska akta sig för att agera smakdomare och diktera kulturens innehåll.« (party programme ↗)“Creative joy flourishes in freedom. Policy should beware of acting as a taste judge and dictating culture's content.”
- general regulatory simplification»Rensa upp i regelträsket för entreprenörer, stora som små.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Clear up the regulatory thicket for entrepreneurs, large and small.”
- lower taxes for business»Sänk skatten på jobb och företagande, särskilt för småföretag och egenföretagare.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Lower taxes on jobs and business, especially for small businesses and self-employed.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan establishes that general measures for the business climate are most important, which speaks against the counter-proposal's requirement for an upgraded sector strategy with higher financing ambition and a new institute for cultural and creative industries.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that general measures for the business climate are most important, which speaks against the counter-proposal's requirement for an upgraded sector strategy with higher financing ambition and a new institute for cultural and creative industries. On the cultural area the plan moreover wants the state to steer less and that culture's own value is protected against mere utility purposes, which goes against making culture the object of business policy steering. The counter-proposal's requirements thus do not lie in line with the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att generella åtgärder för företagsklimatet är viktigast, vilket talar emot motförslagets krav på en uppgraderad branschstrategi med högre finansieringsambition och ett nytt institut för kulturella och kreativa näringar. På kulturområdet vill planen dessutom att staten styr mindre och att kulturens eget värde värnas gentemot rena nyttoändamål, vilket går emot att kulturen görs till föremål för näringspolitisk styrning. Motförslagets krav ligger därför inte i linje med planen.
- general measures ahead of special supportdecisive»företagande, innovationer och tillväxt ska stärkas i hela landet. Viktigast är generella åtgärder för« (party programme ↗)“enterprise, innovation and growth shall be strengthened throughout the country. Most important are general measures for”
- the state shall steer culture less»Därför vill vi att staten ska styra mindre och att det ska vara kulturskapare och inte politiker som fattar besluten om stöd.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Therefore we want the state to steer less and that it shall be culture-makers and not politicians who make decisions on support.”
- culture's own value»Kulturpolitiken ska värna kulturens eget värde gentemot rena nyttoändamål.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Cultural policy shall protect culture's own value against mere utility purposes.”
- reduced regulatory burden»Regelbördan för små företag ska minska, genom ansträngningar på både kommunal, statlig och« (party programme ↗)“The regulatory burden for small enterprises shall decrease, through efforts at both municipal, state and”
The plan states that business policy should be conducted with general means and that direct company subsidies are rejected.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan states that business policy should be conducted with general means and that direct company subsidies are rejected. The counter-proposal's requirement for a sector-targeted strategy with higher financing and a special institute for cultural and creative industries is precisely such targeted business policy. The plan instead wants the state to create a good climate for innovations generally. Therefore the requirement is rejected.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att näringspolitiken ska bedrivas med generella medel och att direkta företagssubventioner avvisas. Motförslagets krav på en branschriktad strategi med högre finansiering och ett särskilt institut för kulturella och kreativa näringar är just sådan riktad näringspolitik. Planen vill i stället att staten skapar ett gott klimat för innovationer generellt. Därför avvisas kravet.
- general business policydecisive»Näringspolitiken ska bedrivas med generella medel,« (party programme ↗)“Business policy should be conducted with general means,”
- no direct subsidies»Direkta företagssubventioner avvisas.« (party programme ↗)“Direct company subsidies are rejected.”
- good innovation climate»gott klimat för innovationer samt produkt- och marknadsutveckling.« (party programme ↗)“good climate for innovations and product and market development.”
The programme explicitly warns that public financing and political ambitions in culture and media policy constitute a risk and sets as a goal independent institutions free from state and politics.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The programme explicitly warns that public financing and political ambitions in culture and media policy constitute a risk and sets as a goal independent institutions free from state and politics. The counter-proposal demands higher ambition levels for reforms and financing plus an investigation of a new state institute for cultural and creative industries. The plan's line is instead general conditions and less red tape for all companies, which is why it rejects the demand.
Original (Swedish)
Programmet varnar uttryckligen för att offentlig finansiering och politiska ambitioner inom kultur- och mediepolitiken utgör en risk och sätter som mål självständiga institutioner fria från stat och politik. Motförslaget kräver högre ambitionsnivå för reformer och finansiering samt utredning av ett nytt statligt institut för kulturella och kreativa näringar. Planens linje är i stället generella villkor och mindre regelkrångel för alla företag, varför den avvisar kravet.
- risk med offentlig kulturfinansieringdecisive»offentlig finansiering och politiska ambitioner utgör en risk.« (party programme ↗)“public financing and political ambitions constitute a risk.”
- kulturliv fritt från politik»Målet ska vara självständiga institutioner som i sin verksamhet står fria från stat och politik.« (party programme ↗)“The goal shall be independent institutions that in their operations stand free from state and politics.”
- generella företagsvillkor»Stärka drivkrafterna för investeringar, forskning och entreprenörskap, genom lägre skatter på företagande« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strengthen the driving forces for investments, research and entrepreneurship, through lower taxes on business”
- regelförenkling framför stöd»Ta bort en tredjedel av företagens administrationskostnader och en tredjedel av regelkrånglet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Remove a third of companies' administrative costs and a third of red tape”
The plan wants to reduce public economic control over the cultural sector and protect cultural institutions' freedom from political interference, while at the same time agencies should be consolidated rather than increased.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to reduce public economic control over the cultural sector and protect cultural institutions' freedom from political interference, while at the same time agencies should be consolidated rather than increased. The counter-proposal's demands for a more ambitious state strategy with increased funding and an investigated institute for cultural and creative industries pull in the opposite direction; the plan's way is general conditions for business.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill minska det offentligas ekonomiska kontroll över kultursektorn och värna kulturinstitutionernas frihet från politiska pekpinnar, samtidigt som myndigheter ska slås samman snarare än bli fler. Motförslagets krav på en mer ambitiös statlig strategi med utökad finansiering och ett utrett institut för kulturella och kreativa näringar drar i motsatt riktning; planens väg är generella villkor för företagande.
- reduced public controldecisive»Minska det offentligas ekonomiska kontroll över samtidskulturen och mediesfären« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Reduce public economic control over contemporary culture and the media sphere”
- fewer agencies»Stoppa slöseriet inom myndigheterna och slå samman myndigheter« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Stop waste in agencies and consolidate agencies”
- general business conditions»Skapa förutsättningar för nyföretagande och entreprenörskap« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Create conditions for start-ups and entrepreneurship”
- freedom from political control»Samtidigt ska oberoende kulturinstitutioners frihet från politiska pekpinnar värnas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“At the same time, the independence of cultural institutions from political interference should be protected.”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2023/24:NU19)
- Committee report full text (HB01NU19)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2023/24:2883 — med anledning av skr. 2023/24:111 Strategi för företag i kulturella och kreativa branscher av Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2023/24:2885 — med anledning av skr. 2023/24:111 Strategi för företag i kulturella och kreativa branscher av Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist och Rickard Nordin (båda C)
- Motion 2023/24:2889 — med anledning av skr. 2023/24:111 Strategi för företag i kulturella och kreativa branscher av Elin Söderberg och Amanda Lind (båda MP)
- Regeringens skrivelse 2023/24:111 — Strategi för företag i kulturella och kreativa branscher
Source: The Swedish Parliament