2026-01-282025/26:NU4 · p.2NUBusiness & energy
State ownership of companies
State ownership of companies
What's at stake: How the state governs its companies affects everything from regional services and employment to climate action and export value; the question is whether profitability requirements should give way to societal benefit or whether the current balance between the two should stand.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the state, in governing companies such as Vattenfall, LKAB, and Sveaskog, should more clearly prioritise societal benefit, regional development, and demographic challenges over profitability requirements, or whether the current ownership strategy, which combines both considerations, should remain unchanged.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee rejects the motions calling for a change in direction for the state's ownership governance and considers that the current ownership strategy, which combines requirements for societal benefit and economic efficiency, should remain in place.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 2 (V)
The reservation (V) holds that societal benefit should always be the focus of the state's ownership strategy ahead of profitability requirements, wants the state to be an active owner in companies such as Vattenfall, LKAB, and Sveaskog in order to promote technological development, climate measures, and more jobs, and wants an inquiry set up into state-owned companies' responsibility for meeting demographic challenges such as depopulation and an ageing population.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 2 by V.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have gone the other way
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: SSocialdemokraterna
Ja 202–21Nej 110–113
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | No 0/19/0/3 | match | confidence: high | explicit |
| S | No | Yes 92/0/0/14 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| MP | No | Yes 16/0/0/2 | differs | confidence: high | derived |
| C | Yes | Abstain 0/0/18/6 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| L | Yes | Yes 14/0/0/2 | match | confidence: medium | derived |
| KD | Yes | Yes 17/0/0/2 | match | confidence: medium | derived |
| M | Yes | Yes 59/0/0/9 | match | confidence: medium | derived |
| SD | No | Abstain 3/0/55/13 | differs | confidence: low | not addressed |
Broke with the party line
| SDAnnelie Sjöberg (SD, Östergötlands län) | Yes — party line: Abstain |
| SDDaniel Persson (SD, Gävleborgs län) | Yes — party line: Abstain |
| SDMona Olin (SD, Kalmar län) | Yes — party line: Abstain |
MPs whose vote differs from their party's majority position in this division. Marked with a dark ring in the chamber view.
Committee proposal
Parliament rejects the motions 2025/26:172 by Birger Lahti et al. (V) demands 1-3 and 15, 2025/26:178 by Tobias Andersson et al. (SD) demand 2, 2025/26:273 by Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist (C) demand 1, 2025/26:864 by Magnus Manhammar (S) and 2025/26:2831 by Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist et al. (C) demand 19.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2025/26:172 av Birger Lahti m.fl. (V) yrkandena 1-3 och 15, 2025/26:178 av Tobias Andersson m.fl. (SD) yrkande 2, 2025/26:273 av Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist (C) yrkande 1, 2025/26:864 av Magnus Manhammar (S) och 2025/26:2831 av Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist m.fl. (C) yrkande 19.
Riksdag decision: Parliament has addressed the Government's communication on the 2025 account of state-owned companies. The communication contains the activity report for the companies in the state's corporate portfolio and highlights their development, particularly in 2024. Parliament emphasizes the importance of the annual recurring communication and stresses the importance of the Government continuing to develop its content so that Parliament obtains a good picture of the development of state-owned companies. Parliament also decided to say no to approximately 50 proposals that concern state ownership and management both at an overall level and regarding individual companies. Of these, approximately 20 proposals were submitted during the general motion period 2025. Parliament thereby filed the communication in the record, that is, closes the matter.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants public interest to be prioritized over profit in state ownership strategy and for the government to investigate state-owned companies' role in addressing demographic challenges. (V) — Reservation 2
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The party programme states that activities we own together should be run with focus on long-term public benefit and that ownership power should actively direct the economy toward societal goals, which is precisely the counter-proposal's demand for public benefit before profit requirements.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme states that activities we own together should be run with focus on long-term public benefit and that ownership power should actively direct the economy toward societal goals, which is precisely the counter-proposal's demand for public benefit before profit requirements. The plan also wants to see greater collective ownership in mining and points to regionally balanced development as a reason for collective ownership. Active ownership directives for climate and jobs follow directly from this.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet slår fast att de verksamheter vi äger tillsammans ska drivas med fokus på långsiktig samhällsnytta och att ägarmakten aktivt ska styra ekonomin mot samhälleliga mål, vilket är precis motförslagets krav på samhällsnytta framför lönsamhetskrav. Planen vill dessutom se ett större gemensamt ägande i gruvbrytningen och pekar ut regionalt balanserad utveckling som ett skäl till gemensamt ägande. Aktiva ägardirektiv för klimat och jobb följer direkt av detta.
- public benefit before profitabilitydecisive»Vi vill att de verksamheter vi äger tillsammans drivs med fokus på den« (party programme ↗)“We want the activities we own together to be run with focus on the”
- active state ownership»Vi vill använda den ägandemakten till att aktivt styra« (party programme ↗)“We want to use ownership power to actively direct”
- regional balance»för att skapa en regionalt balanserad ekonomisk utveckling.« (party programme ↗)“to create regionally balanced economic development.”
- collectively owned mining»Vi vill gå mot ett större gemensamt ägande av gruvbrytningen i« (party programme ↗)“We want to move toward greater collective ownership of mining in”
The plan explicitly requires strengthened public interest in the governance of state-owned companies and democratic control over socially important functions.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan explicitly requires strengthened public interest in the governance of state-owned companies and democratic control over socially important functions. That the state is an active owner who through ownership directives drives technological development, climate measures and jobs is thereby the plan's own line, as is greater state responsibility for equivalent conditions throughout the country. This also corresponds to the plan's requirement for systems that strengthen the local community with major industrial establishments.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver uttryckligen ett stärkt samhällsintresse i styrningen av de statliga bolagen och demokratisk kontroll över samhällsviktiga funktioner. Att staten är en aktiv ägare som via ägardirektiv driver teknikutveckling, klimatåtgärder och jobb är därmed planens egen linje, liksom ett större statligt ansvar för likvärdiga förutsättningar i hela landet. Det motsvarar också planens krav på system som stärker lokalsamhället vid stora industrietableringar.
- public interest in state-owned companiesdecisive»Stärkt samhällsintresse i styrningen av de statliga bolagen.« (party programme ↗)“Strengthened public interest in the governance of state-owned companies.”
- democratic control»Demokratisk kontroll över välfärden och samhällsviktiga funktioner.« (party programme ↗)“Democratic control over welfare and socially important functions.”
- regional equivalence»Större statligt ansvar för likvärdiga förutsättningar i hela Sverige.« (party programme ↗)“Greater state responsibility for equivalent conditions throughout Sweden.”
- support for the local community»System för att stärka lokalsamhället vid stora industrietableringar.« (party programme ↗)“Systems to strengthen the local community with major industrial establishments.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan establishes that state-owned enterprises shall be steered toward climate goals and that return on investment shall be deprioritised, and that public funds shall not be invested in environment-destroying activities.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that state-owned enterprises shall be steered toward climate goals and that return on investment shall be deprioritised, and that public funds shall not be invested in environment-destroying activities. It also wants the whole country to live with public services in all areas. The counter-proposal's requirement for public benefit before profitability, active ownership directives for climate and jobs, and regional balance follow from this.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att statliga bolag ska styras mot klimatmålen och att avkastningskrav ska nedprioriteras, och att offentliga medel inte ska placeras i miljöförstörande verksamhet. Den vill också att hela landet ska leva med samhällsservice i alla områden. Motförslagets krav på samhällsnytta före lönsamhet, aktiva ägardirektiv för klimat och jobb samt regional balans följer av detta.
- public benefit before returndecisive»Statliga bolag och myndigheter inom järnvägssektorn ska styras mot klimatmålen och krav på avkastning ska nedprioriteras.« (party programme ↗)“State-owned enterprises and authorities within the railway sector shall be steered toward climate goals and demands for return on investment shall be deprioritised.”
- sustainability requirements on public capital»Offentliga medel och pensionsfonder ska inte placeras i verksamheter som bidrar till miljöförstöring, krig eller kränkningar av mänskliga rättigheter.« (party programme ↗)“Public funds and pension funds shall not be invested in activities that contribute to environmental destruction, war or violations of human rights.”
- public services throughout the country»Vi vill att alla delar av landet ska leva, och att samhället ska säkerställa att samhällsservice ska finnas i alla områden.« (party programme ↗)“We want the whole country to live, and society shall ensure that public services shall exist in all areas.”
- market subordinate to public benefit»Marknaden är till för människan – inte tvärtom.« (party programme ↗)“The market is for people – not the other way around.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The party programme requires a functioning market economy free from planned economy pointers and establishes that it is individuals who start and run enterprises.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme requires a functioning market economy free from planned economy pointers and establishes that it is individuals who start and run enterprises. That the state as owner shall set socially useful purposes before profitability and steer companies with political ownership directives for technology development and jobs is precisely such political detailed control of business activities. The counter-proposal's demands therefore conflict with the plan's economic worldview.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet kräver en välfungerande marknadsekonomi fri från planekonomiska pekpinnar och slår fast att det är enskilda människor som startar och driver företagen. Att staten som ägare ska sätta samhällsnyttiga ändamål före lönsamhetskrav och styra bolagen med politiska ägardirektiv för teknikutveckling och jobb är just en sådan politisk detaljstyrning av näringsverksamhet. Motförslagets krav strider därmed mot planens ekonomiska grundsyn.
- competition as driving forcedecisive»Konkurrens är en viktig drivkraft för utvecklingen av marknadsekonomin.« (party programme ↗)“Competition is an important driving force for the development of the market economy.”
- individuals create jobs»Det är enskilda människor som startar, driver och utvecklar företagen och som skapar jobben i hela vårt land.« (party programme ↗)“It is individuals who start, run and develop enterprises and who create jobs across our country.”
- local value from natural resources»Mer av värdet som skapas från naturresurser — exempelvis vindkraft, vattenkraft och gruvor — ska stanna kvar lokalt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“More of the value created from natural resources — for example wind power, hydropower and mines — should remain locally.”
flags: citat_blockerat
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan limits state business operations to cases with strong public interest and warns against operations that crowd out private alternatives.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan limits state business operations to cases with strong public interest and warns against operations that crowd out private alternatives. That the state should instead use ownership actively for socially beneficial purposes ahead of profitability, with ownership directives on technology development, climate and jobs, is the opposite of that stance. The plan moreover wants to meet regional challenges with general measures, not through state-owned enterprises.
Original (Swedish)
Planen begränsar statligt företagande till fall med starkt samhällsintresse och varnar för verksamhet som tränger ut privata alternativ. Att staten i stället ska använda ägandet aktivt för samhällsnyttiga ändamål framför lönsamhet, med ägardirektiv om teknikutveckling, klimat och jobb, är motsatsen till den hållningen. Planen vill dessutom möta regionala utmaningar med generella åtgärder, inte via de statliga bolagen.
- limited state business operationsdecisive»Det offentliga ska endast driva affärsverksamhet om det finns ett starkt samhällsintresse.« (party programme ↗)“The public sector shall only run business operations if there is a strong public interest.”
- the state shall not crowd out private»Det offentliga ska inte driva verksamheter som tränger ut fungerande privata alternativ eller försvårar nyföretagande. Staten ska inte äga flygbolag, banker och telebolag.« (party programme ↗)“The public sector shall not run operations that crowd out functioning private alternatives or hinder new enterprise. The state shall not own airlines, banks and telecom companies.”
- general regional policy»Viktigast är generella åtgärder för att förbättra företagsklimatet och infrastrukturen, samt en fungerande offentlig service.« (party programme ↗)“Most important are general measures to improve the business climate and infrastructure, and a functioning public service.”
- market economy's precedence»Den fria marknadsekonomin är det mest framgångsrika ekonomiska system som finns för att skapa välstånd, men också det enda kända system som går att förena med individuell frihet.« (party programme ↗)“The free market economy is the most successful economic system known for creating prosperity, but also the only known system compatible with individual freedom.”
The plan sees the state's role in business policy as overseeing that legislation and good ethics are maintained on the market, wants business policy to be conducted with general means and wants personal ownership to be encouraged at the expense of institutional ownership.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan sees the state's role in business policy as overseeing that legislation and good ethics are maintained on the market, wants business policy to be conducted with general means and wants personal ownership to be encouraged at the expense of institutional ownership. The counter-proposal's demand that the state as active owner shall put socially beneficial purposes before profitability and steer companies through owner directives goes in the opposite direction to this market-economic foundation.
Original (Swedish)
Planen ser statens roll i näringspolitiken som att övervaka att lagstiftning och god etik upprätthålls på marknaden, vill att näringspolitiken bedrivs med generella medel och att det personliga ägandet uppmuntras på bekostnad av det institutionella. Motförslagets krav på att staten som aktiv ägare ska sätta samhällsnyttiga ändamål före lönsamhetskrav och styra bolagen genom ägardirektiv går i motsatt riktning mot denna marknadsekonomiska grundsyn.
- the state's role is to overseedecisive»Statens roll i näringspolitiken är att övervaka att lagstiftningen och en god etik upprätthålls« (party programme ↗)“The state's role in business policy is to oversee that legislation and good ethics are maintained”
- personal ownership instead of institutional»angeläget att det personliga ägandet uppmuntras på bekostnad av det institutionella ägandet.« (party programme ↗)“it is important that personal ownership is encouraged at the expense of institutional ownership.”
- general means in business policy»Näringspolitiken ska bedrivas med generella medel« (party programme ↗)“Business policy shall be conducted with general means”
- market economy as foundation»Marknadsekonomin bygger på att människor enskilt eller i olika former av samverkan fritt« (party programme ↗)“Market economy is based on people individually or in various forms of cooperation freely”
The plan wants to reduce public ownership and sell off a larger share of Sveaskog's holdings, rather than using ownership as a political control instrument.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to reduce public ownership and sell off a larger share of Sveaskog's holdings, rather than using ownership as a political control instrument. The party programme establishes that a large state leads to a weaker society and that prosperity is created in a free business sector. The requirement that public benefit objectives should take precedence over profitability requirements and that the state should direct the companies through ownership directives therefore goes against the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill minska det statliga ägandet och sälja av en större andel av Sveaskogs innehav, inte använda ägandet som politiskt styrmedel. Partiprogrammet slår fast att en stor stat leder till ett svagare samhälle och att välståndet skapas i ett fritt näringsliv. Kravet att samhällsnyttiga ändamål ska gå före lönsamhetskrav och att staten ska styra bolagen genom ägardirektiv går därför emot planen.
- reduced state ownershipdecisive»Sälja av en större andel av statliga Sveaskogs innehav till personer med regional anknytning« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sell off a larger share of the state-owned Sveaskog's holdings to people with regional ties”
- limited state role»En stor stat leder till ett svagare samhälle.« (party programme ↗)“A large state leads to a weaker society.”
- the business sector drives development»Stärka drivkrafterna för investeringar, forskning och entreprenörskap, genom lägre skatter på företagande« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strengthen the incentives for investment, research and entrepreneurship, through lower taxes on business”
- respect for public funds»Offentligt slöseri i alla former ska bekämpas.« (party programme ↗)“Public waste in all forms should be combated.”
The plan criticizes that income from resource extraction and industry rarely reaches the local region and demands that the whole country benefits from prosperity.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan criticizes that income from resource extraction and industry rarely reaches the local region and demands that the whole country benefits from prosperity. The counter-proposal's demand that the state as owner in companies such as Vattenfall, LKAB, and Sveaskog steer towards public benefit and regional balance aligns with this. However, the demand for climate-directed ownership directives has no support in the plan, so the conclusion is uncertain.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kritiserar att intäkter från råvaruutvinning och industri sällan kommer lokalbygden till del och kräver att hela landet får del av välståndet. Motförslagets krav på att staten som ägare i bolag som Vattenfall, LKAB och Sveaskog styr mot samhällsnytta och regional balans ligger i linje med det. Kravet på klimatinriktade ägardirektiv har dock inget stöd i planen, varför slutsatsen är osäker.
- raw material income to local areadecisive»om hur intäkter från råvaruutvinning och industri sällan kommer lokalbygden till del« (2022 manifesto ↗)“about how revenue from resource extraction and industry rarely reaches the local region”
- prosperity for the whole country»Låta hela landet få del av välstånd« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Let the whole country benefit from prosperity”
- all of Sweden shall thrive»Principen om att hela Sverige skall leva är mycket viktig för Sverigedemokraterna.« (party programme ↗)“The principle that all of Sweden shall thrive is very important to Sweden Democrats.”
- prioritized Swedish industry»Prioritera svensk industri och konkurrenskraft« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Prioritize Swedish industry and competitiveness”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2025/26:NU4)
- Committee report full text (HD01NU4)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2025/26:172 — med anledning av skr. 2024/25:140 2025 års redogörelse för företag med statligt ägande av Birger Lahti m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2025/26:178 — med anledning av skr. 2024/25:140 2025 års redogörelse för företag med statligt ägande av Tobias Andersson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:217 — med anledning av skr. 2024/25:140 2025 års redogörelse för företag med statligt ägande av Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:2213 — Försäljning av delar av Sveaskog av Sten Bergheden (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2240 — Försäljning av SJ av Sten Bergheden (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2258 — Stärkt landsbygd med ökad försäljning av Sveaskogs skogar av Sten Bergheden (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2269 — Avyttring av delar av Sveaskog för satsning på försvaret och kärnkraften av Sten Bergheden (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2370 — Fungerande postservice, bredband och telefoni i hela landet av Malin Östh m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2025/26:2441 — Statligt ägande av Oliver Rosengren och Gustaf Göthberg (båda M)
- Motion 2025/26:2526 — Lämnande av Postnord och återupprättande av Posten AB av Mattias Eriksson Falk m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:273 — med anledning av skr. 2024/25:140 2025 års redogörelse för företag med statligt ägande av Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist (C)
- Motion 2025/26:2784 — Biologisk mångfald av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2025/26:2817 — En aktiv industri- och landsbygdspolitik av Birger Lahti m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2025/26:2831 — En näringspolitik för tillväxt i hela landet av Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2025/26:3274 — För en framtidssäkrad och hållbar svensk järnväg av Linus Lakso m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2025/26:3354 — Opinionsbildande myndigheter och statliga bolag av Helena Storckenfeldt och Lars Püss (båda M)
- Motion 2025/26:3422 — En grön klimathandlingsplan 2026 av Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2025/26:769 — Statliga bolags medlemskap i Svenskt Näringsliv av Joakim Sandell m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:864 — Heltid som norm i statligt ägda bolag av Magnus Manhammar (S)
- Motion 2025/26:90 — Begränsningar i myndigheters och statliga bolags opinionsbildning av Josef Fransson (SD)
Source: The Swedish Parliament