2025-06-172024/25:SoU29 · p.2SoUHealth & social services

Alternative Solution

A leisure card or support for associations for children's leisure activities

What's at stake: The choice of model affects how broadly the support reaches children and young people, especially those in economically disadvantaged households, and how many resources associations receive to lower the threshold for organised activities.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

The question is whether state support for children's and young people's leisure activities should take the form of an individual leisure card, as the government proposes, or instead be channelled as support to sports and cultural organisations.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The committee shares the government's view that targeted support in the form of a leisure card creates better conditions for children's and young people's participation in leisure activities than a general grant to associations would, and therefore rejects the motion calling for support to organisations instead.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 2 (MP)

The reservation (MP) calls for the resources allocated to the leisure card to instead go to central organisations, to lower the threshold for more children and young people to take part in sports and cultural activities. The reasoning is that support for associations needs to be preserved and developed rather than replaced by individual-based benefits.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 2 by MP.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
VNoAbstain 1/0/19/4departs from the planconfidence: mediumderived
SNoYes 93/0/0/13departs from the planconfidence: mediumderived
MPown reservationYesNo 0/15/0/3departs from the planconfidence: lowderived
CYesYes 21/0/0/3follows the planconfidence: lowderived
LYesYes 14/0/0/2follows the planconfidence: mediumderived
KDNoYes 16/0/0/3departs from the planconfidence: lowderived
MNoYes 59/0/0/9departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed
SDNoYes 63/0/0/9departs from the planconfidence: mediumderived

Broke with the party line

VIda Gabrielsson (V, Stockholms kommun)Yes — party line: Abstain

MPs whose vote differs from their party's majority position in this division. Marked with a dark ring in the chamber view.

Committee proposal

The Riksdag rejects the motion 2024/25:3419 by Nils Seye Larsen et al. (MP) amendment 2.

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen avslår motion 2024/25:3419 av Nils Seye Larsen m.fl. (MP) yrkande 2.

Riksdag decision: More children and youth should have access to sports, culture, outdoor recreation and association life. The Riksdag approved the government's proposal to introduce a recreation card for children and youth. The proposals include, among other things a state subsidy in the form of a recreation card for children's recreational activities a new law on the E-Health Board's processing of personal data in recreation card matters that a recreation card can be provided to one of the child's guardians who is resident in Sweden and with whom the child lives that the E-Health Board shall be responsible for handling recreation card matters. The purpose of the recreation card is to promote children's opportunities to participate in recreational activities that contribute to an active and meaningful recreation together with others. The Riksdag also approved the government's proposal to amend the Social Services Act and the law on reporting requirements in order to prevent incorrect payments from welfare systems and fraud, regulatory violations and crime in working life. The legislative amendments come into force on 8 September 2025.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietNoAbstaindeparts from the planderived

The plan wants sports and culture organizations to be anchored in associational democracy and stand strong against market interests, and pushes for conditions that secure their independence.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan wants sports and culture organizations to be anchored in associational democracy and stand strong against market interests, and pushes for conditions that secure their independence. The counter-proposal's demand that resources go to the organizations instead of to individual short-term benefits follows from this. The election manifesto furthermore wants to give children and young people municipally supported leisure activities, that is, support to the activity rather than to individual purchases.

Original (Swedish)

Planen vill att idrottens och kulturens organisationer är förankrade i föreningsdemokrati och står starka mot marknadsintressen, och driver på för villkor som säkrar deras självständighet. Motförslagets krav på att resurserna går till organisationerna i stället för till en individuell kortförmån följer av det. Valmanifestet vill dessutom ge barn och unga kommunalt stödda fritidsaktiviteter, alltså stöd till verksamheten snarare än till enskilda köp.

  • associational democratic sportsdecisive»demokrati och stå starka mot marknadsintressen.« (party programme ↗)“democracy and stand strong against market interests.”
  • publicly supported leisure for youth»Ge barn och ungdomar möjligheter till kommunalt stödda fritidsaktiviteter« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Give children and youth opportunities for municipally supported leisure activities”
  • secured conditions for associational life»Vi driver på för villkor som säkrar en stark« (party programme ↗)“We push for conditions that secure a strong”
  • meaningful leisure for all children»för att alla barn ska ha en meningsfull fritid.« (party programme ↗)“so that all children have a meaningful leisure time.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

SSocialdemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The plan's consistent line is collective solutions through a vibrant associational life and a sports movement that builds bridges, rather than individual benefit constructions.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan's consistent line is collective solutions through a vibrant associational life and a sports movement that builds bridges, rather than individual benefit constructions. The election manifesto wants access to leisure activities at reasonable costs to increase and establishes that parents' wallets shall not decide, which the counter-proposal wants to achieve by lowering thresholds at the organizations. This speaks for organizational support rather than a targeted short-term benefit.

Original (Swedish)

Planens genomgående linje är kollektiva lösningar genom ett livskraftigt föreningsliv och en idrottsrörelse som bygger broar, snarare än individuella bidragskonstruktioner. Valmanifestet vill att tillgången till fritidsaktiviteter till rimliga kostnader ökar och slår fast att föräldrarnas plånbok inte ska avgöra, vilket motförslaget vill uppnå genom att sänka trösklarna hos organisationerna. Det talar för organisationsstöd framför en riktad kortförmån.

  • strong associational life for young peopledecisive»Livskraftigt föreningsliv som särskilt stöttar barn och unga.« (party programme ↗)“Vibrant associational life that particularly supports children and young people.”
  • leisure activities for all children»Tillgången till fritidsaktiviteter till rimliga kostnader, både vad gäller idrott och kultur, behöver öka. Föräldrarnas plånbok ska inte avgöra.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Access to leisure activities at reasonable costs, both for sport and culture, needs to increase. Parents' wallets shall not decide.”
  • vibrant popular movements»Livskraftiga folkrörelser för att hålla ihop samhället.« (party programme ↗)“Vibrant popular movements to hold society together.”
  • sports movement's role»Idrottsrörelse som främjar integration, bygger broar mellan människor och bidrar till bättre folkhälsa och psykiskt välmående.« (party programme ↗)“Sports movement that promotes integration, builds bridges between people and contributes to better public health and mental well-being.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MPMiljöpartietYesNodeparts from the planderived

The plan points out that children in economically vulnerable families have poorer access to leisure activities and requires increased resources directed to the most disadvantaged families.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan points out that children in economically vulnerable families have poorer access to leisure activities and requires increased resources directed to the most disadvantaged families. This speaks in favour of support that reaches these children directly rather than general organisation grants, thus against the counter-proposal's redistribution. The plan's support for mass sports and youth sports pulls the other way, so the conclusion is uncertain.

Original (Swedish)

Planen pekar ut att barn i ekonomiskt utsatta familjer har sämre tillgång till fritidsaktiviteter och kräver ökade resurser riktade till de sämst ställda familjerna. Det talar för ett stöd som når dessa barn direkt snarare än ett generellt organisationsbidrag, alltså emot motförslagets omfördelning. Planens stöd till bredd- och ungdomsidrott drar åt andra hållet, varför slutsatsen är osäker.

  • unequal access to leisuredecisive»Barn i familjer i ekonomisk utsatthet har också sämre tillgång till fritidsaktiviteter.« (party programme ↗)“Children in families in economic vulnerability also have poorer access to leisure activities.”
  • directed resources to the most disadvantaged»Det behövs en politik som ger ökade resurser till de sämst ställda familjerna för att ge alla barn trygghet och minska klyftorna i Sverige.« (party programme ↗)“There is a need for a policy that provides increased resources to the most disadvantaged families to give all children security and reduce inequalities in Sweden.”
  • participation regardless of family economy»Alla barn ska ha möjlighet att utöva kultur inom någon form av kulturskola oavsett familjens ekonomiska förutsättningar.« (party programme ↗)“All children shall have the opportunity to engage in culture in some form of cultural school regardless of the family's economic circumstances.”
  • support for mass sports»Genom resurser till ungdoms- och breddidrotten, inklusive idrott för människor med funktionsnedsättning, korpidrott och motionsidrott, investerar vi i såväl livskvalitet som folkhälsa.« (party programme ↗)“Through resources to youth and mass sports, including sport for people with disability, corporate sports and recreational sports, we invest in both quality of life and public health.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

CCenterpartietYesYesfollows the planderived

The party programme makes voucher systems and individual choice the keys to reconciling justice with self-determination in publicly financed activities.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The party programme makes voucher systems and individual choice the keys to reconciling justice with self-determination in publicly financed activities. The counter-proposal wants instead to shift resources from the individual to organizations, which goes against that principle. The plan values the sports movement's contributions, but the decisive line is that support should follow the individual's choice.

Original (Swedish)

Partiprogrammet gör pengsystem och individens valfrihet till nycklarna för att förena rättvisa med självbestämmande i offentligt finansierad verksamhet. Motförslaget vill i stället flytta resurserna från den enskilda till organisationerna, vilket går emot den principen. Planen värdesätter samtidigt idrottsrörelsens insatser, men den avgörande linjen är att stödet ska följa individens val.

  • voucher following the individualdecisive»Vårdpeng, skolpeng, omsorgspeng och jobbpeng är nycklar för att förena rättvisa med självbestämmande.« (party programme ↗)“Care vouchers, school vouchers, care vouchers and job vouchers are keys to reconciling justice with self-determination.”
  • freedom of choice as principle»Valfriheten är en viktig princip och en nyckel för att förena frihet med rättvisa.« (party programme ↗)“Freedom of choice is an important principle and a key to reconciling freedom with justice.”
  • individual influence»Alla ska ha inflytande över sina egna liv också när det gäller välfärdstjänster.« (party programme ↗)“Everyone should have influence over their own lives even when it comes to welfare services.”
  • sport's social value»Idrottsrörelsen och Sveriges folkrörelser gör värdefulla insatser för att bygga tillit och gemenskap.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The sports movement and Sweden's popular movements make valuable contributions to building trust and community.”
LLiberalernaYesYesfollows the planderived

The plan's bearing principle is that support shall strengthen the individual's power and freedom of choice, even when the measure is needs-tested, and that policy shall prioritise those who have least freedom.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan's bearing principle is that support shall strengthen the individual's power and freedom of choice, even when the measure is needs-tested, and that policy shall prioritise those who have least freedom. Support that goes directly to the child's own recreational activity responds to that principle better than a general organisational grant. The plan certainly protects civil society financing, but that is not enough to support the requirement to redirect resources to organisations.

Original (Swedish)

Planens bärande princip är att stöd ska stärka den enskildes makt och valfrihet, även när insatsen är behovsprövad, och att politiken ska prioritera dem som har minst frihet. Ett stöd som går direkt till barnets egen fritidsaktivitet svarar mot den principen bättre än ett generellt organisationsbidrag. Planen värnar visserligen civilsamhällets finansiering, men det räcker inte för att stödja kravet på att styra om resurserna till organisationerna.

  • choice strengthens the individualdecisive»välfärdstjänsterna stärker individens makt och ska tillämpas på alla områden där så är möjligt« (party programme ↗)“welfare services strengthen the individual's power and shall be applied in all areas where possible”
  • choice in needs-tested measures»Valfrihet ska garanteras även för behovsprövade insatser.« (party programme ↗)“Freedom of choice shall be guaranteed even for needs-tested measures.”
  • evening out life chances»Det socialliberala uppdraget är att förbättra varje individs livschanser genom att utjämna de« (party programme ↗)“The social-liberal mission is to improve every individual's life chances by evening out the”
  • protected civil society financing»Vi vill fortsätta förbättra civilsamhällets finansiering genom både bredare skatteavdrag för gåvor och långsiktiga statsbidrag.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to continue to improve civil society financing through both broader tax deductions for donations and long-term state grants.”
KDKristdemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The subsidiarity principle means that the public shall support the natural communities instead of replacing them, and the plan wants the public support in the first place to be directed to children's and young people's activities in associational life.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The subsidiarity principle means that the public shall support the natural communities instead of replacing them, and the plan wants the public support in the first place to be directed to children's and young people's activities in associational life. Directing resources to sports and cultural organizations follows from this, as does that voluntary activities shall be prioritized over commercial interests. At the same time the election manifesto prioritizes society's youngest, which can also speak for a targeted individual support, so the position is uncertain.

Original (Swedish)

Subsidiaritetsprincipen innebär att det offentliga ska stödja de naturliga gemenskaperna i stället för att ersätta dem, och planen vill att det offentliga stödet i första hand inriktas mot barn- och ungdomsverksamhet i föreningslivet. Att rikta resurserna till idrotts- och kulturorganisationerna följer av detta, liksom av att ideell verksamhet ska prioriteras framför kommersiella intressen. Samtidigt prioriterar valmanifestet samhällets yngsta, vilket också kan tala för ett riktat individstöd, så ställningstagandet är osäkert.

  • support, not replace communitiesdecisive»ska det offentliga stödja de naturliga nätverken.« (party programme ↗)“shall the public support the natural networks.”
  • support for children's and young people's activities»första hand inriktas mot barn- och ungdomsverksamhet.« (party programme ↗)“first place be directed to children's and young people's activities.”
  • sport as a popular movement»idrotten som folkrörelse utgörs dock av många enskildas ideella insatser« (party programme ↗)“sport as a popular movement consists however of many individuals' voluntary efforts”
  • strengthened civil society»STÄRKT CIVILSAMHÄLLE« (2022 manifesto ↗)“STRENGTHENED CIVIL SOCIETY”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MModeraternaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The counter-proposal wants to direct resources to sports and cultural organisations instead of an individual short benefit.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The counter-proposal wants to direct resources to sports and cultural organisations instead of an individual short benefit. The plan's concrete commitment in the area is a particular sports initiative for vulnerable areas and initiatives that prevent young people being drawn into crime, that is support that goes through the activities. The plan also emphasises choice for the individual, which pulls the other way and makes the assessment uncertain.

Original (Swedish)

Motförslaget vill rikta resurserna till idrotts- och kulturorganisationerna i stället för till en individuell kortförmån. Planens konkreta åtagande på området är ett särskilt idrottslyft för utsatta områden och satsningar som förebygger att unga dras in i kriminalitet, alltså stöd som går via verksamheterna. Planen betonar samtidigt valfrihet för den enskilde, vilket drar åt andra hållet och gör bedömningen osäker.

  • sports initiative in vulnerable areasdecisive»Genomföra ett särskilt idrottslyft för utsatta områden« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Carry out a particular sports initiative for vulnerable areas”
  • preventive initiatives»Samtidigt behövs satsningar på socialtjänsten och skolan för att på sikt förhindra att fler dras in i kriminalitet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“At the same time resources are needed for social services and schools to ultimately prevent more being drawn into crime.”
  • responsibility for the vulnerable»en offentlig välfärd som skyddar dem som är utsatta« (party programme ↗)“a public welfare that protects those who are vulnerable”
  • choice for the individual»För Moderaterna är valfrihet en central del av den svenska« (party programme ↗)“For the Moderates choice is a central part of the Swedish”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

SDSverigedemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The plan wants to promote community life and give sports movements the conditions for continued viability, and the party programme states that the public's task is to highlight and support the voluntary sector.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan wants to promote community life and give sports movements the conditions for continued viability, and the party programme states that the public's task is to highlight and support the voluntary sector. Directing resources to organizations instead of individual subsidies aligns with this. The goal that more children should participate in sports is shared, but the way to get there according to the plan is through voluntary associations.

Original (Swedish)

Planen vill främja föreningslivet och ge idrottsrörelserna förutsättningar till fortsatt livskraft, och partiprogrammet slår fast att det offentligas uppgift är att lyfta fram och stödja den ideella sektorn. Att rikta resurserna till organisationerna i stället för till individuella bidrag ligger i linje med detta. Målet att fler barn ska idrotta delas, men vägen dit går enligt planen via föreningarna.

  • promote community lifedecisive»Samhället bör i större utsträckning tillgodose behovet av idrottsanläggningar, främja föreningslivet och underlätta elitklubbar att bedriva verksamhet på en nivå som mäter sig i internationell konkurrens.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Society should to a greater extent meet the need for sports facilities, promote community life, and facilitate elite clubs to conduct activities at a level that competes internationally.”
  • support for voluntary sector»Precis som i fallet med familjerna består statens och kommunernas primära uppgift i att lyfta fram och stödja den ideella sektorn utan att i alltför hög grad begränsa dess handlingsfrihet.« (party programme ↗)“Just as in the case of families, the state's and municipalities' primary task is to highlight and support the voluntary sector without to too great an extent limiting its freedom of action.”
  • viable sports movement»Ge idrottsrörelserna förutsättningar till fortsatt livskraft« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Give sports movements the conditions for continued viability”
  • increased sports participation»Öka idrottandet i hela befolkningen« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Increase sports participation across the population”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament