2025-06-172024/25:SfU22 · p.4SfUMigration & social insurance

Control Outside the Detention Facility

The Migration Agency's ability to use security guards for supervision outside the detention facility

What's at stake: The option of using external guards could give the Migration Agency more flexibility when detainees are outside the detention facility, for example during hospital visits. At the same time, it raises questions about the exercise of public authority, cost-effectiveness, and staff familiarity with detention operations and the target group.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

The question is whether the Migration Agency should be allowed to appoint guards from authorised security companies to supervise detainees outside the detention facility, or whether this should be reserved for the agency's own staff.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The committee rejects the motion and supports allowing the Migration Agency to appoint a guard from an authorised security company for certain guarding duties when a detainee is outside the detention facility.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 5 (S)

The reservation considers that supervising detainees outside the detention facility constitutes an exercise of public authority that should, as far as possible, be carried out by the Migration Agency's own staff, both because it is more cost-effective than hiring private actors and because the agency should retain control over its operations, and because its own staff are familiar with both detention operations and the target group.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 5 by S.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
VNoAbstain 0/0/20/4departs from the planconfidence: mediumderived
Sown reservationNoNo 0/93/0/13follows the planconfidence: highderived
MPNoYes 15/0/0/3departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed
CNoYes 21/0/0/3departs from the planconfidence: mediumderived
LNoYes 14/0/0/2departs from the planconfidence: mediumderived
KDNoYes 16/0/0/3departs from the planconfidence: mediumderived
MYesYes 59/0/0/9follows the planconfidence: mediumderived
SDYesYes 63/0/0/9follows the planconfidence: mediumderived

Committee proposal

The Riksdag rejects the motion 2024/25:3423 by Anders Ygeman et al. (S) amendment 2.

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen avslår motion 2024/25:3423 av Anders Ygeman m.fl. (S) yrkande 2.

Riksdag decision: The Riksdag approved the government's proposal that the Migration Board be granted expanded opportunities to use force and control measures at detention facilities. Detention facilities are the special locked residential facilities that the Migration Board can use, for example, if there is a risk that a person will stay in Sweden after a decision on deportation. The legislative amendments include, among other things, expanded opportunities to conduct body searches, room inspections and entry control. A new form of visits is also introduced, where the visitor and the person in detention meet with a glass barrier between them. The purpose of the law is to improve the opportunities to maintain order and security at the detention facilities. The legislative amendments shall come into force on 1 August 2025.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietNoAbstaindeparts from the planderived

The plan establishes that the parts of society that exercise power over people shall clearly be embedded in democratic structures with functioning accountability.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan establishes that the parts of society that exercise power over people shall clearly be embedded in democratic structures with functioning accountability. The counter-proposal's requirement that guarding of those held in custody be carried out by the authority's own personnel instead of by private security firms follows from that, as does the election manifesto's criticism of market solutions having taken over common tasks. Legal certainty for the detainee points the same way.

Original (Swedish)

Planen slår fast att de delar av samhället som utövar makt över människor tydligt ska vara inordnade i demokratiska strukturer med fungerande ansvarsutkrävande. Motförslagets krav på att bevakning av förvarstagna utförs av myndighetens egen personal i stället för av privata bevakningsföretag följer av det, liksom av valmanifestets kritik mot att marknadslösningar tagit över gemensamma uppgifter. Rättssäkerheten för den förvarstagne talar åt samma håll.

  • exercise of power in democratic structuresdecisive»vara tydligt inordnade i demokratiska strukturer. Det ställer också« (party programme ↗)“be clearly embedded in democratic structures. It also sets”
  • against market solutions for security»De senaste decennierna har politiken förlitat sig på att marknaden ska lösa våra behov av trygghet, men marknadslösningar har urholkat vår gemensamma välfärd samtidigt som en allt större del av våra skattemedel går till administration och kontroll.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Over the past decades, policy has relied on the market to meet our needs for security, but market solutions have hollowed out our shared welfare while an ever-larger part of our tax revenues go to administration and control.”
  • against privatised public responsibility»Vänsterpartiet vill motverka den privatisering som sker av kvinnojourernas verksamhet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Left Party wants to counter the privatisation of women's crisis centre activities.”
  • dignified treatment of asylum seekers»sin rätt till en individuell och rättssäker prövning under värdiga« (party programme ↗)“right to an individual and legally sound examination under dignified”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

SSocialdemokraternaNoNofollows the planderived

The party programme establishes that the state's monopoly on violence shall be maintained, that criminal justice should be equipped in public management and that it is serious that important societal functions have been delegated to private market actors.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The party programme establishes that the state's monopoly on violence shall be maintained, that criminal justice should be equipped in public management and that it is serious that important societal functions have been delegated to private market actors. Supervision of detainees outside detention facilities is just such a function. The plan thereby speaks for the counter-proposal's demand that the task be performed by the agency's own staff to the greatest extent possible.

Original (Swedish)

Partiprogrammet slår fast att statens våldsmonopol ska upprätthållas, att kriminalvården ska vara rustad i offentlig regi och att det är allvarligt att viktiga samhällsfunktioner överlåtits till privata marknadsaktörer. Bevakning av förvarstagna utanför förvaret är just en sådan funktion. Planen talar därmed för motförslagets krav att uppgiften i så stor utsträckning som möjligt utförs av myndighetens egen personal.

  • the state's monopoly on violencedecisive»Statens våldsmonopol upprätthålls.« (party programme ↗)“The state's monopoly on violence is maintained.”
  • compulsory care in public management»Rustad kriminalvård i offentlig regi.« (party programme ↗)“Well-equipped criminal justice in public management.”
  • do not outsource societal functions»Därför är det allvarligt att viktiga samhällsfunktioner överlåtits till privata marknadsaktörer, som i värsta fall kontrolleras av främmande makt.« (party programme ↗)“Therefore, it is serious that important societal functions have been delegated to private market actors, who in the worst case are controlled by foreign powers.”
  • democratic control»Demokratisk kontroll över välfärden och samhällsviktiga funktioner.« (party programme ↗)“Democratic control over welfare and important societal functions.”
MPMiljöpartietNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan requires good public oversight of all law enforcement activities and guarantees that refugees are assured a fair legal process, which speaks in favour of keeping guard duties over those held in custody within the agency's own personnel rather than contracting with private security companies.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan requires good public oversight of all law enforcement activities and guarantees that refugees are assured a fair legal process, which speaks in favour of keeping guard duties over those held in custody within the agency's own personnel rather than contracting with private security companies. The plan generally wants to remove commercial actors from publicly funded activities and apply the principle of public access where this applies. However, the question of guard assignments is not addressed.

Original (Swedish)

Planen kräver god medborgerlig insyn i all rättsvårdande verksamhet och att flyktingar garanteras en rättssäker process, vilket talar för att bevakning av förvarstagna hålls inom myndighetens egen personal snarare än läggs på privata bevakningsföretag. Planen vill generellt få bort kommersiella aktörer ur offentligt finansierad verksamhet och låta offentlighetsprincipen gälla där. Frågan om just väktarförordnanden behandlas dock inte.

  • oversight of law enforcement activitiesdecisive»Det ska finnas god medborgerlig insyn i all rättskipande och rättsvårdande verksamhet« (party programme ↗)“There shall be good public oversight of all judicial and law enforcement activities”
  • legal certainty in asylum processing»flyktingar ska garanteras en rättssäker asylprocess i Sverige.« (party programme ↗)“refugees shall be guaranteed a fair asylum process in Sweden.”
  • scepticism toward commercial providers»Vi vill därför få bort de kommersiellt inriktade aktörerna och i stället främja idéburna verksamheter inom välfärdssektorn.« (party programme ↗)“We therefore want to remove commercially oriented actors and instead promote idea-driven activities within the welfare sector.”
  • public access with public funding»Meddelarfrihet och offentlighetsprincipen ska gälla alla offentligt finansierade välfärdstjänster.« (party programme ↗)“Freedom of information and the principle of public access shall apply all publicly funded welfare services.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

CCenterpartietNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The party programme establishes that the state is the only entity in society that may exercise coercion and violence and that this power must be subject to control.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The party programme establishes that the state is the only entity in society that may exercise coercion and violence and that this power must be subject to control. Supervision of detainees is such coercion, which supports the counter-proposal's requirement that the task is primarily performed by the authority's own personnel. The plan's requirement that the state performs its mission efficiently and securely points in the same direction.

Original (Swedish)

Partiprogrammet slår fast att staten är den enda enheten i samhället som får utöva tvång och våld och att den makten måste vara föremål för kontroll. Bevakning av förvarstagna är sådan tvångsutövning, vilket talar för motförslagets krav att uppgiften i första hand utförs av myndighetens egen personal. Planens krav på att staten gör sitt uppdrag effektivt och rättssäkert pekar åt samma håll.

  • the state's monopoly on forcedecisive»Staten är den enda enheten i samhället som får utöva tvång och våld. Därför måste den makt som staten utövar vara föremål för kontroll.« (party programme ↗)“The state is the only entity in society that may exercise coercion and violence. Therefore, the power the state exercises must be subject to control.”
  • efficient and secure state»Centerpartiets uppgift är att se till att staten gör det den är till för, så effektivt och rättssäkert som möjligt« (party programme ↗)“The Centre Party's task is to ensure that the state does what it is meant to do, as efficiently and securely as possible”
  • requirements of the rule of law»Rättsstaten och individens rättigheter gentemot staten måste försvaras.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The rule of law and the individual's rights against the state must be defended.”
  • cost-effectiveness»Politiken ska hushålla med skattebetalarnas pengar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Policy must be a good steward of taxpayers' money.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

LLiberalernaNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The plan establishes that it is only the state that shall combat crime and be responsible for a functioning legal order, which speaks for guarding of detained persons being carried out by the authority's own personnel.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan establishes that it is only the state that shall combat crime and be responsible for a functioning legal order, which speaks for guarding of detained persons being carried out by the authority's own personnel. It moreover wants to strengthen supervision of authorities' exercise of power against individuals and strengthen the rule of law. The counter-proposal's demand that exercise of authority be retained within the authority therefore follows from the plan's principles.

Original (Swedish)

Planen slår fast att det endast är staten som ska bekämpa brott och ansvara för en fungerande rättsordning, vilket talar för att bevakning av frihetsberövade utförs av myndighetens egen personal. Den vill dessutom stärka tillsynen över myndigheternas maktutövning mot enskilda och förstärka rättssäkerheten. Motförslagets krav på att myndighetsutövningen behålls inom myndigheten följer därmed av planens principer.

  • state's responsibility for legal orderdecisive»men det är endast staten som ska bekämpa brott och ansvara för en fungerande« (party programme ↗)“but it is only the state that shall combat crime and be responsible for a functioning”
  • supervision of exercise of power»Tillsynen över myndigheternas maktutövning mot enskilda behöver utvecklas genom starka« (party programme ↗)“Supervision of authorities' exercise of power against individuals needs to be developed through strong”
  • strengthened rule of law»Rättssäkerheten och skyddet för de medborgerliga fri- och rättigheterna behöver förstärkas.« (party programme ↗)“The rule of law and protection of civil liberties and rights needs to be strengthened.”
  • efficient legal system»Rättsväsendets förmåga och effektivitet behöver förbättras så att« (party programme ↗)“The legal system's capacity and efficiency need to be improved so that”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

KDKristdemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The plan draws a clear line: it is the public activities that are not authority exercise that should be competitively procured.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan draws a clear line: it is the public activities that are not authority exercise that should be competitively procured. Guarding of detained persons outside the police custody unit is authority exercise, which according to that principle shall be carried out by the authority's own personnel. The plan furthermore emphasizes legal certainty in the asylum process and cost monitoring, which further speaks for the counter-proposal's demands.

Original (Swedish)

Planen drar en tydlig gräns: det är den offentliga verksamhet som inte är myndighetsutövning som bör upphandlas i konkurrens. Bevakning av frihetsberövade utanför förvarslokalen är myndighetsutövning, vilket enligt den principen ska utföras av myndighetens egen personal. Planen betonar också rättssäkerhet i asylprocessen och kostnadsuppföljning, vilket ytterligare talar för motförslagets krav.

  • authority exercise not competitively procureddecisive»Övrig offentlig verksamhet, som inte är myndighetsutövning, bör« (party programme ↗)“Other public activities, that are not authority exercise, should”
  • competitive procurement of other activities»upphandlas i konkurrens.« (party programme ↗)“be competitively procured.”
  • legal certainty in migration matters»För den som söker asyl i Sverige måste hela processen vara utformad så att rättssäkerhet garanteras den« (party programme ↗)“For those who seek asylum in Sweden the entire process must be designed so that legal certainty is guaranteed to the”
  • cost monitoring»Utvärdering, kostnadsuppföljning och kvalitetskontroll är därför viktiga politiska« (party programme ↗)“Evaluation, cost monitoring and quality control are therefore important political”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MModeraternaYesYesfollows the planderived

The counter-proposal wants monitoring of detainees outside the facility to be performed by the agency's own personnel instead of security guards.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The counter-proposal wants monitoring of detainees outside the facility to be performed by the agency's own personnel instead of security guards. The plan's principle is the opposite: tasks should be streamlined and work that others can do as well should not be performed by the state, which the plan concretises by moving secondary tasks away from the police. The plan prioritises that the agency's core tasks are accomplished, not that it performs all monitoring itself.

Original (Swedish)

Motförslaget vill att bevakning av förvarstagna utanför förvaret utförs av myndighetens egen personal i stället för av väktare. Planens princip är den motsatta: uppdrag ska renodlas och uppgifter som andra kan utföra lika bra ska inte utföras av det offentliga, vilket planen konkretiserar genom att flytta bort sidouppgifter från polisen. Planen prioriterar att myndighetens kärnuppdrag klaras, inte att den själv utför all bevakning.

  • others than the state can performdecisive»Om något kan göras lika bra eller bättre av« (party programme ↗)“If something can be done as well or better by”
  • streamlined agency roles(2022 manifesto)
  • focus on core task»Renodla Polisens uppdrag med fokus på att upptäcka, utreda och klara upp brott« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Streamline the Police's role with focus on detecting, investigating and solving crimes”
  • capacity in return work»Kraftigt öka antalet utvisningar genom fler EU-gemensamma återtagandeavtal« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Significantly increase the number of removals through more EU-wide return agreements”

flags: citat_ej_verifierat

SDSverigedemokraternaYesYesfollows the planderived

The party programme states that what matters most is not who performs a task but that it is performed for the greatest benefit at the lowest cost.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The party programme states that what matters most is not who performs a task but that it is performed for the greatest benefit at the lowest cost. The plan is moreover explicitly open to complementing the police organization with security guards with expanded authority. Requiring that the guarding of detained persons be performed by the authority's own personnel would tie up resources that the plan would rather use for more executed deportations.

Original (Swedish)

Partiprogrammet slår fast att det viktigaste inte är vem som utför en uppgift utan att den utförs med största nytta till lägsta kostnad. Planen är dessutom uttryckligen öppen för att komplettera polisorganisationen med ordningsvakter med utvidgade befogenheter. Att kräva att bevakningen av förvarstagna utförs av myndighetens egen personal skulle binda resurser som planen hellre vill använda för fler verkställda utvisningar.

  • pragmatic view of providersdecisive»Det viktigaste för oss är i de flesta fall inte vem som utför en specifik uppgift utan att uppgiften utförs på ett sätt som renderar medborgarna största möjliga nytta till lägsta möjliga kostnad.« (party programme ↗)“What matters most for us is in most cases not who performs a specific task but that the task is performed in a way that provides citizens the greatest possible benefit at the lowest possible cost.”
  • security guards as complement»Fler vägar in i polisyrket behöver också utredas liksom om det är möjligt att komplettera den befintliga polisorganisationen med att anställa ordningsvakter med utvidgade befogenheter och ändamålsenlig utrustning.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“More pathways into police work should also be explored, as well as whether it is possible to complement the existing police organization by employing security guards with expanded authority and appropriate equipment.”
  • more efficient enforcement»Trösklarna för att ta i förvar och utvisa personer samt verkställa utvisningar behöver också sänkas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The thresholds for taking into custody and deporting people and enforcing deportations also need to be lowered.”
  • more controls and deportations»Bekämpa skuggsamhället och illegal migration med fler kontroller och fler utvisningar« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Combat the shadow economy and illegal migration with more controls and more deportations”

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament